DOCSLIB.ORG

Religion-And-The-Challenges.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Religion-And-The-Challenges.Pdf RELIGION AND THE CHALLENGES OF SCIENCE Does science pose a challenge to religion and religious belief? This question has been a matter of long•standing debate • and it continues to concern not only scholars in philosophy, theology, and the sciences, but also those involved in public educational policy. This volume provides background to the current ‘science and religion’ debate, yet focuses as well on themes where recent discussion of the relation between science and religion has been particularly concentrated. The first theme deals with the history of the interrelation of science and religion. The second and third themes deal with the implications of recent work in cosmology, biology and so•called intelligent design for religion and religious belief. The fourth theme is concerned with ‘conceptual issues’ underlying, or implied, in the current debates, such as: Are scientific naturalism and religion compatible? Are science and religion bodies of knowledge or practices or both? Do religion and science offer conflicting truth claims? By illuminating contemporary discussion in the science•religion debate and by outlining the options available in describing the relation between the two, this volume will be of interest to scholars and to members of the educated public alike. This page intentionally left blank Religion and the Challenges of Science Edited by WILLIAM SWEET St Francis Xavier University, Canada and RICHARD FEIST Saint Paul University, Canada © William Sweet and Richard Feist 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. William Sweet and Richard Feist have asserted their moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the editors of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Gower House Suite 420 Croft Road 101 Cherry Street Aldershot Burlington, VT 05401•4405 Hampshire GU11 3HR USA England Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Religion and the challenges of science 1. Religion and science 2. Religion and science – History I. Sweet, William II. Feist, Richard, 1964– 261.5’5 Library of Congress Cataloging•in•Publication Data Religion and the challenges of science / edited by William Sweet and Richard Feist. p. cm. Includes index. 1. Religion and science. I. Sweet, William. II. Feist, Richard. BL241.R363 2007 201’.65–dc22 2006030598 ISBN 978•0•7546•5715•6 Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall. Contents Acknowledgments vii List of Contributors ix Introduction 1 Rethinking Relations between Science and Religion William Sweet Part I History and Contexts in Biology and Evolutionary Theory 1 ‘The Declaration of Students of the Natural and Physical 19 Sciences’, revisited: Youth, Science, and Religion in mid•Victorian Britain Hannah Gay 2 Theological Insights from Charles Darwin 39 Denis O. Lamoureux 3 A Model of Interaction Between Science and Theology 55 Based on the Scientific Papers of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Lodovico Galleni and Marie•Claire Groessens•Van Dyck 4 Biology and a Theology of Evolution 73 Arthur Peacocke Part II Physics, Philosophy, and Fine•Tuning 5 Creation, Metaphysics, and Cosmology 91 Lawrence Dewan, O.P. 6 Cosmological Theories and the Question of the Existence of 109 a Creator John L. Bell 7 Whitehead, God, and Relativity 121 Richard Feist 8 Design Inferences, Fine•Tuning, and the Prior Probability of 131 Divine Intelligent Agency: What the Fine•Tuning Argument Shows Kenneth Einar Himma vi Religion and the Challenges of Science Part III Naturalism and the Non•Natural 9 On Scientific Explanations of God•Experiences 145 Jerome Gellman 10 The Human Genome Revolution, Society, and Religion 153 Job Kozhamthadam 11 Partner of the Sciences or Object of Study? 169 Theology and Religion in Relation to the Sciences Willem B. Drees 12 Beyond Naturalism: Scientific Creativity and 185 Theological Knowledge Paul Allen Part IV Conceptual Issues 13 Can Science Provide Evidence for Metaphysics? 199 Leslie Armour 14 Science and Religious Belief: Some Conceptual Issues 217 William Sweet Index 233 Acknowledgements The relation between science and religion has been a major topic of discussion in the last decades of the twentieth century, and this issue promises to remain so in years to come. Unfortunately the intensity of this discussion often seems to be inversely proportionate to the quality of the discourse. This volume aims at clarifying some of the underlying conceptual issues involved, providing an opportunity to discuss the particular contributions of philosophy, the physical and biological sciences, theology and religious studies, and history to this issue, and considering directions in which philosophical reflection on this issue might be fruitfully pursued. We wish to express our appreciation to our fellow authors in this volume for their participation in this project as well as their patience. We also wish to acknowledge Iain McKenna, Douglas McDermid, and Jason West, who helped to engage some of the issues with the authors. We would like to thank Anne Keirby, of Ashgate Publishers, for her support of this project. Two of the essays here were published prior to the appearance of this volume. We would like to thank Philip Hefner, Editor•in•Chief of Zygon, for permission to reprint Arthur Peacocke’s essay, ‘Biology and a Theology of Evolution’ (which appeared in Zygon, 34/4 [1999]: 695–712), and the Editors of Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, in which ‘Theological Insights from Charles Darwin’ by Denis O. Lamoureux appeared (in Vol. 56 [2004]: 2–12). We would particularly like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for a grant that assisted in the publication of this volume. William Sweet and Richard Feist This page intentionally left blank Contributors William Sweet (Editor) is Vice•President (academic) and Professor of Philosophy at St Thomas University, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. He is the author of Idealism and Rights (1997, 2005), Religious Belief: The Contemporary Debate (2003) and, with Hendrik Hart, Responses to the Enlightenment: An Exchange on Foundations, Faith, and Community (2007). He has edited several collections of scholarly essays, including La philosophie de la religion à la fin du vingtième siècle (1993), God and Argument (1999), Idealism, Metaphysics and Community (2001), Philosophical Theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (2003), Approaches to Metaphysics (2004), The Philosophy of History: a re•examination (2004), and, most recently, Bernard Bosanquet and the Legacy of British Idealism (2007). He is a member of the Steering Committee of the Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie, Vice President of the Istituto Internazionale Jacques Maritain (Rome), and President of the Canadian Philosophical Association. Richard Feist (Editor) is Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy at Saint Paul University in Ottawa, Canada. He is the author of Inference and Persuasion (2005, with Leslie Armour), and has edited Husserl and the Sciences: Selected Perspectives (2004) and Husserl and Stein (2004, with William Sweet), and has published in Études maritainiennes, Science et Esprit , Synthese , De Philosophia, and other journals. Paul Allen teaches in the Department of Theological Studies, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; for several years he was also the Canadian Director of the Science and Religion Course Programme, sponsored by the Centre for Theology and the Natural Sciences (Berkeley). He is the author of Via Media: Ernan McMullin and Critical Realism in the Science•Theology Dialogue (2006) and has published in the Heythrop Journal, Théologiques, and the Encyclopedia of Science and Religion . Leslie Armour is Research Professor at the Dominican College, Ottawa, and Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Ottawa. He is the author of ‘ Infini Rien’: Pascal’s Wager and the Human Paradox (1993), Being and Idea: Developments of Some Themes in Spinoza and Hegel (1992), The Idea of Canada and the Crisis of Community (1981), The Faces of Reason: an essay on philosophy and culture in English Canada, 1850–1950 (1981, with Elizabeth Trott), The Conceptualization of the Inner Life (1980, with Edward T. Bartlett), Logic and Reality: an Investigation into the Idea of a Dialectical System (1972), The Concept of Truth (1969), and The Rational and the Real: an Essay in Metaphysics (1962). He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. John L. Bell is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Western Ontario. He is the author (with D. DeVidi and G. Solomon†) of Logical Options: An Introduction to x Religion and the Challenges of Science Classical and Alternative Logics (2001), The Art of the Intelligible: An Elementary Survey of Mathematics in its Conceptual Development (1999), A Primer of Infinitesimal Analysis (1998), Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction (1988), Boolean•Valued Models and Independence Proofs in Set Theory (1977; 2nd ed., 1985), and (with M. Machover) A Course in Mathematical Logic (1977; 2nd printing, 1986). He has also published articles in Transcendent Philosophy , Archive for Mathematical Logic, Husserl and the Sciences, History of Mathematical Logic , Axiomathes, Philosophia Mathematica , Journal of Philosophical Logic, Stanford Encylopedia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Philosophic Study of Religion (With Editorial
    ; THE PHILOSOPHIC STUDY OF RELIGION. BY GEORGE A. BARROW. THE age of the opposition of religion to philosophy has gone by not, however, as has been sometimes said, to give place to an era of good feeling, which is virtually a triumph for the philos- opher, but to be succeeded by a period of indifference to pJiilosophy. The religious leader of to-day does not oppose, he disregards, phi- losophy. Academic circles have not recognized this to any extent, but to an outsider nothing is more marked than the weariness of even educated laymen with any form of philosophical discussion. They care less for it than they do for the old dogmatic sermons of our fathers. The movement of our religious and church life to-day is more practical, we say, and rightly. I do not, however, believe that this is due to any depreciation of philosophy on the part of the religious man, but only to the feeling that the philosopher has not con- sidered him. The study I have undertaken in this paper is to find and set forth the explanation of this disregard. In the modern philosophical study of religion there are three directions of advance. The interest that undoubtedly does exist on the part of the student of philosophy towards religion takes the form either of a study of theism, of the science of religion, or of the philosophy of religion. Theism exists either as the philosophic form of orthodox theology, or as the philosophic construction of monism or absolutism. In the first case we have the same attitude to religion whether we are dealing with an advocate of the idea of a divine revelation above reason, or with a man who draws his arguments for that revelation from current philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophical Investigation of the Nature of God in Igbo Ontology
    Open Journal of Philosophy, 2015, 5, 137-151 Published Online March 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2015.52016 A Philosophical Investigation of the Nature of God in Igbo Ontology Celestine Chukwuemeka Mbaegbu Department of Philosophy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria Email: [email protected] Received 25 February 2015; accepted 3 March 2015; published 4 March 2015 Copyright © 2015 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract In its general task, philosophy as an academic or professional exercise is a conscious, critical, per- sonal reflection on human experience, on man, and how he perceives and interprets his world. This article specifically examines the nature of God in Igbo ontology. It is widely accepted by all philosophers that man in all cultures has the ability to philosophize. This was what Plato and Aris- totle would want us to believe, but it is not the same as saying that man has always philosophized in the academic meaning of the word in the sense of a coherent, systematic inquiry, since power and its use are different things altogether. Using the method of analysis and hermeneutics this ar- ticle sets out to discover, find out the inherent difficulties in the common sense views, ideas and insights of the pre-modern Igbo of Nigeria to redefine, refine and remodel them. The reason is sim- ple: Their concepts and nature of realities especially that of the nature of God were very hazy, in- articulate and confusing.
    [Show full text]
  • God Is Not a Person (An Argument Via Pantheism)
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2019) 85:281–296 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9678-x ARTICLE God is not a person (an argument via pantheism) Simon Hewitt1 Received: 22 November 2017 / Accepted: 3 July 2018 / Published online: 6 July 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract This paper transforms a development of an argument against pantheism into an objection to the usual account of God within contemporary analytic philosophy (’Swinburnian theism’). A standard criticism of pantheism has it that pantheists cannot ofer a satisfactory account of God as personal. My paper will develop this criticism along two lines: frst, that personhood requires contentful mental states, which in turn necessitate the membership of a linguistic community, and second that personhood requires limitation within a wider context constitutive of the ’setting’ of the agent’s life. Pantheism can, I argue, satisfy neither criterion of personhood. At this point the tables are turned on the Swinburnian theist. If the pantheist cannot defend herself against the personhood-based attacks, neither can the Swinburnian, and for instructively parallel reasons: for neither doctrine is God in the material world; in the pantheist case God is identical with the world, in the Swinburnian case God transcends it. Either way both the pantheist and the Swinburnian are left with a dilemma: abandon divine personhood or modify the doctrine of God so as to block the move to personhood. Keywords Pantheism · Divine personhood · Apophaticism · Divine language Is God a person? Since the advent of philosophy of religion in the analytic tradi- tion the consensus of opinion has favoured answering this question in the afrma- tive (as we will see in due course).
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Naturalism: the Current Debate
    Religious Naturalism: The Current Debate Leidenhag, M. (2018). Religious Naturalism: The Current Debate. Philosophy Compass, 13(8), [e12510]. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12510 Published in: Philosophy Compass Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2018 The Author(s) Philosophy Compass © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:02. Oct. 2021 Religious Naturalism: The Current Debate A religious naturalist seeks to combine two beliefs. The first belief is that nature is all there is. There is no “ontologically distinct and superior realm (such as God, soul, or heaven) to ground, explain, or give meaning to this world” (Stone, 2008, 1). Moreover, the natural sciences are the only or at least most reliable source of knowledge about the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Read This Article (PDF)
    Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism Published on behalf of the American Humanist Association and The Institute for Humanist Studies Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism Editor John R. Shook, American Humanist Association Consulting Editor Anthony Pinn, Rice University, USA Editorial Board Louise Antony, University of Massachusetts, USA; Arthur Caplan, New York University, USA; Patricia Churchland, University of California, USA; Franz de Waal, Emory University, USA; Peter Derkx, University of Humanistics, Netherlands; Greg Epstein, Harvard University, USA; Owen Flanagan, Duke University, USA; James Giordano, Georgetown University, USA; Rebecca Goldstein, USA; Anthony Clifford Grayling, New College of the Humanities, United Kingdom; Susan Hansen, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Jennifer Michael Hecht, USA; Marian Hillar, Houston Humanists, USA; Sikivu Hutchinson, Los Angeles County Commission on Human Relations, USA; Philip Kitcher, Columbia University, USA; Stephen Law, University of London, United Kingdom; Cathy Legg, University of Waikato, New Zealand; Jonathan Moreno, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Stephen Pinker, Harvard University, USA; Charlene Haddock Seigfried, Purdue University, USA; Michael Shermer, The Skeptics Society, USA; Alistair J. Sinclair, Centre for Dualist Studies, United Kingdom; Stan van Hooft, Deakin University, Australia; Judy Walker, USA; Sharon Welch, Meadville Theological Seminary, USA Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism publishes scholarly papers concerning philosophical, historical, or interdisciplinary aspects of humanism, or that deal with the application of humanist principles to problems of everyday life. EPH encourages the exploration of aspects and applications of humanism, in the broadest sense of “philosophical” as a search for self-understanding, life wisdom, and improvement to the human condition. The topic of humanism is also understood to embrace its thoughtful manifestations across the widest breadth of cultures and historical periods, and non-western perspectives are encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2005 Faculty News
    Spring 2005 Faculty news Guest speakers New courses for 2005-06 New faculty in the Department Philosophy medals and awards Philosophy Theses for 2005 WHAT’S NEW IN THE DEPARTMENT @X It has been an interesting and busy year in Philosophy @ StFX, and 2005-06 promises to be the same. In the fall, the Department will be offering a number of courses for the first time – Philosophy of Law (Phil 372), Social and Political Philosophy (Phil 371) and Ethics in Health and Medicine (Phil 366). We will also be offering a senior seminar on the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant (Phil 460). A new professor, Dr. John Cook, will be joining the Department of Philosophy in the fall – he is our second new faculty member in as many years. (Read more about Dr. Cook on page 3.) In the past year, several books have been published by professors in the Department, and Department members continue to be invited to give lectures across Canada and around the world. The StFX Philosophy Club has been active as well – and their new T-shirts are one of the “must have” items of 2005. The breadth and range of study and research – by students and by faculty – in Philosophy at StFX is FACULTY OF THE remarkable. The quality of our teaching and research DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY has been long recognised. Dr. Steven Baldner received Back row (left to right): Louis Groarke, William Sweet the University’s Distinguished Teaching Award in (Chair), James Mensch. 2004, and Dr. William Sweet received its Research Front row (left to right): Stephen Baldner, Award in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Theistic Critiques of Atheism William Lane Craig Used by Permission of in the Cambridge Companion to Atheism, Pp
    Theistic Critiques Of Atheism William Lane Craig Used by permission of In The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, pp. 69-85. Ed. M. Martin. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2007. SUMMARY An account of the resurgence of philosophical theism in our time, including a brief survey of prominent anti-theistic arguments such as the presumption of atheism, the incoherence of theism, and the problem of evil, along with a defense of theistic arguments like the contingency argument, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. THEISTIC CRITIQUES OF ATHEISM Introduction The last half-century has witnessed a veritable revolution in Anglo-American philosophy. In a recent retrospective, the eminent Princeton philosopher Paul Benacerraf recalls what it was like doing philosophy at Princeton during the 1950s and '60s. The overwhelmingly dominant mode of thinking was scientific naturalism. Metaphysics had been vanquished, expelled from philosophy like an unclean leper. Any problem that could not be addressed by science was simply dismissed as a pseudo-problem. Verificationism reigned triumphantly over the emerging science of philosophy. "This new enlightenment would put the old metaphysical views and attitudes to rest and replace them with the new mode of doing philosophy." [1] The collapse of the Verificationism was undoubtedly the most important philosophical event of the twentieth century. Its demise meant a resurgence of metaphysics, along with other traditional problems of philosophy which Verificationism had suppressed. Accompanying this resurgence has come something new and altogether unanticipated: a renaissance in Christian philosophy. The face of Anglo-American philosophy has been transformed as a result.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Naturalism
    Religious Naturalism Michael BarreƩ wonders whether religious naturalism might be ‘a beƩer mouse- trap’. What does ‘religious naturalism’ Rather than trace the burgeoning of modern religious naturalism all through the enlightenment mean? era, it is more useful to focus on the development of this way of thinking in late 19th and early 20th The nineteenth century American thinker Emerson, century USA and Britain. Around that time seen by some as a precursor of modern religious religious naturalism diverged down two parallel naturalism, wrote: ‘If a man builds a better mouse- paths: a non-theistic mainstream approach, trap, the world will beat a path to his door.’ expressed for example by agnostic pragmatist However, if religious naturalism is an example, as I George Santayana, and a theistic approach in which, suggest, of his ‘better mousetrap’, why aren’t more as suggested earlier, Emerson is often cited as an people beating a path to that door? Why isn’t important influence. Some of Emerson’s religious naturalism more widely known? transcendentalist ideas, such as his notion of a ‘universal soul’ within or behind life, would today The term ‘religious’ is used here not to refer to a rule him out as a mainstream religious naturalist. cultural system or to any particular faith or philosophy, but to suggest the kind of affective In the mid-20th century modern religious experience – emotional or ‘spiritual’ feeling – of naturalism flourished among thinkers in the United awe, wonder, at-one-ness, respect, and reverence, States. Henry Nelson Wieman, professor of which can be evoked by nature. philosophy of religion at Chicago University in the 1930s-40s, adopted what he called ‘a theistic stance, ‘Naturalism’ is a view of the world and man’s but without a supernatural God’.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicarious Lulu5 FINALEST VAN NIEUWE DEFINITIVE2 Allerbest …
    Envoy When in the Spring of 2015 I started on the editing of this book, it was out of dissatisfaction. The definitive book on my life-long Nkoya research (‘Our Drums Are Always On My Mind’, in press (a)) only required some tedious up- dating for which I lacked the inspiration, and my ongoing ‘Sunda’ empirical research on ‘Rethinking Africa’s transcontinental continuities in pre- and pro- tohistory’, recently enriched by a spell of field-work on the Bamileke Plateau, Cameroon, had reached a break-through. The models of transcontinental inter- action which I had hitherto applied, had turned out to need more rethinking than I had bargained for, and the prospects of bringing out the Nkoya or the Sunda book by the end of the year were thwarted. I thought to remedy this unpleasant situation by quickly compiling a book of my many articles on inter- cultural philosophy. Most of these had already been published and therefore could be expected to be in an accomplished state of textual editing. But I had totally misjudged, both the amount of work involved (given my current stan- dards of perfection), and the centrality this new project was to occupy within the entire scope of my intellectual production. Only gradually did I come to realise what I was really doing: writing my philosophical and Africanist testa- ment, by bringing to bear, upon the original arguments conceived for a phi- losophical audience, the full extent of my comparative empirical research over the last two decades. In this way, what emerged was increasingly a coherent statement on empirically-grounded intercultural philosophy, greatly inspired and intellectually equipped by my philosophical adventure around the Rotter- dam chair of Foundations of Intercultural Philosophy, yet revisiting and reviv- ing the methods and theories of my original training, research and teaching as an anthropologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Robert Alistair Larmer (Short Version)
    Curriculum Vitae of Robert Alistair Larmer (Short Version) Institutional Address: Department of Philosophy University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 4400 Fredericton, New Brunswick Canada E3B 5A3 (Email: [email protected]) (Fax: 1-506-447-3072) (Phone: 1-506-453-4762) Research: (Refereed work is indicated by an >R=) Books (R) Dialogues on Miracle (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock, 2015) (R) The Legitimacy of Miracle (Lanham:MD: Lexington Books, 2014) (R) Ethics in the Workplace: Selected Readings in Business Ethics, 2nd edition, (Los Angeles: Wadsworth Publishing, 2001) (R) Water Into Wine? An Investigation of the Concept of Miracle (Montreal: McGill- Queen's Press, 1988; rpt. 1996). (R) Ethics in the Workplace: Selected Readings in Business Ethics (New York: West Educational Publishing, 1996) (R) Questions of Miracle (Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press, 1996) Chapters in Books (R) The Meaning of Miracle in The Cambridge Companion to Miracle, ed. Graham Twelftree, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) (R) Miracles as Evidence for the Existence of God in God and Argument, ed. William Sweet (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1999) (R) Improper Payments and Gifts@ in Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 2, (Academic Press, 1998) (R) Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty in Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Business Ethics and Society, edited Lisa H. Newton/Maureen M. Ford, 3rd-9th editions (Guilford, Connecticut: Dushkin, 1994-2007) Articles in Academic Journals (R) “Theistic Evolution, Intelligent Design, and the Charge of Deism” Philosophia Christi. Vol. 20, No. 2, 2018. 415-428. (R) “Decretalism and the Laws of Nature” Philosophia Christi. Vol. 19, No. 2, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • On Kalam Argument
    An Argument for God Software Engineering Last updated Wednesday, December 02, 1998 THE KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (Written not by Curtis Hrischuk but by some other fellow) What follows is a short presentation of the Kalam Cosmological Argument for the existence of God. The sources used in this presentation are documented according to current Modern Language Association standards. Consult the cited works of Craig for a more thorough statement and defense of the argument. The KCA has its roots in medieval Arabic philosophy and theology. The Arabic word "kalam" means "speech," but more broadly it means "natural theology" or "philosophical theism" (Craig, KALAM, 4). The distinctive feature of kalam-style cosmology is its stress on the impossibility of the actual infinite. Put simply, kalam arguments try to demonstrate (1) that the existence of an actual infinite (a concept from modern set theory to be discussed shortly) is impossible and (2) that even if it were possible, the universe itself is not actually infinite and hence must have had a beginning. The KCA has also been defended by Christian and Jewish philosophers. It is currently being defended by professional philosophers William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland. The majority of what follows comes from Craig's defense of the argument, though I will use my own words and sometimes my own examples and comments. Here is an outline of the argument-- [1] The universe either had: [A] a beginning [B] or no beginning [2] If it had a beginning, the beginning was either: [A] caused [B] or uncaused [3] If it had a cause, the cause was either: [A] personal [B] or not personal The KCA works by supporting the [A] option of each premise and then using it in the following premise.
    [Show full text]
  • İçindekiler Tanımlar
    Din Vikipedi, özgür ansiklopedi Dîn ile karıştırılmamalıdır. Din, genellikle doğaüstü, kutsal ve ahlakî öğeler taşıyan, çeşitli ayin, uygulama, değer ve kurumlara sahipinançlar ve ibâdetler bütünü. Zaman zaman inanç sözcüğünün yerine kullanıldığı gibi, bazen de inanç sözcüğü din sözcüğünün yerinde kullanılır. Dinler tarihine bakıldığında, farklı kültür, topluluk ve bireylerde din kavramının farklı biçimlere sahip olduğu, dinlerin müntesipleri tarafından her çağda, coğrafya ve kültür değerlerine göre yeniden tasarlandığı görülür. Arapça kökenli bir sözcük olan din sözcüğü, köken itibarıyla "yol, hüküm, mükafat" gibi anlamlara sahiptir. İçindekiler Tanımlar Çeşitli dini semboller, soldan sağa: Dinle İlgili Bazı Konu ve Anlayışlar 1. sıra: Hristiyanlık, Musevilik, Hinduizm Din ve Bilim 2. sıra: İslam, Budizm, Şintoizm Din, Felsefe ve Metafizik 3. sıra: Sihizm, Bahailik, Jainizm Ezoterizm ve Mistisizm Çeşitli Dünya Dinleri Nüfus Oranları Ayrıca bakınız Dipnotlar Kaynakça Notlar Dış bağlantılar Tanımlar Din kavramı Encyclopedia.com'da şöyle tanımlanır: Çeşitli çağdaş Pagan inanışlarının "Din üyelerine bir bağlılık amacı, bireylerin simgeleri: eylemlerinin kişisel ve sosyal sonuçlarını Slav • Keltik • Cermenik • Letonya yargılayabilecekleri bir davranış kuralları bütünü ve Helenizm • Ermeni • Romen • Kemetizm bireylerin gruplarını ve evreni bağlayabilecekleri Vika • Macar • Litvanya (açıklayabilecekleri) bir düşünce çerçevesi veren bir [1] Estonya • Çerkez • Semitik • Tanrıça düşünce, his ve eylem sistemidir." tapınması Türk Dil Kurumu sözlüğünde:
    [Show full text]