DOCSLIB.ORG

Pantheism and Science in Victorian Britain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pantheism and Science in Victorian Britain Pantheism and Science in Victorian Britain Jincheng Shi Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Philosophy, Religion, and History of Science September 2018 Intellectual Property and Publication Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Jincheng Shi to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Jincheng Shi in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 1 Abstract In discussing the relationship between science and religion during the Victorian period, historians have paid much attention to Christian monotheism, deism, spiritualism, materialism, agnosticism, and atheism; however, pantheism has received little attention. Yet the Victorians published thousands of discussions of pantheism, which shows that pantheism was a significant religious position in the Victorian ferment of faith. Through exploring these writings, this dissertation shows that there was considerable interest in pantheism among Victorian thinkers concerning the viability of pantheism and its relationship with science. The first two chapters present a general account of pantheism in Victorian Britain, with eight Victorian advocates of pantheism being identified and their lives and philosophies being introduced. These people are John Hunt, Alfred Barratt, James Martineau, Thomas Elford Poynting, James Hinton, James Allanson Picton, Charles Bray, and Constance Plumptre. As science became the dominant intellectual authority in Victorian Britain, many Victorian religious thinkers made use of it in support of their religious doctrines. The next three chapters show that advocates of pantheism likewise drew heavily on contemporary scientific theories in advancing and defending their pantheistic views of God, the world, humans, ethics, science and religion, and the future of religion. They were strongly attracted to theories that implied a unified and creative universe, such as the correlation of forces, the idea of living matter, and the evolutionary theory of life. Scientific practitioners John Tyndall and Thomas Huxley and evolutionary philosopher Herbert Spencer were their most popular scientific sources. In consequence of pantheistic uses of science, these writers and their theories were sometimes criticised for being pantheistic, and pantheism was often treated as a science-related threat by Christian critics. This dissertation demonstrates that pantheism was more widely accepted in Victorian Britain than has been previously recognised and that pantheistic thinkers drew extensively on science. 3 Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Historiography ............................................................................................................ 14 Pantheism as a Historian’s Category .......................................................................... 25 Dissertation Structure ................................................................................................ 32 1 Pantheism in Victorian Britain ................................................................................. 35 1.1 Pantheistic Traditions ........................................................................................... 36 1.1.1 Spinoza and German Idealistic Pantheism .................................................... 36 1.1.2 Poetical Pantheism ........................................................................................ 42 1.1.3 Materialistic Pantheism ................................................................................. 50 1.2 Changing Views of Pantheism .............................................................................. 57 1.2.1 Growing Concerns with Pantheism from the 1830s to the 1850s ................ 57 1.2.2 New Supports for Pantheism from the 1860s to the 1890s .......................... 62 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 74 2 Diverse Ways to Pantheism in Victorian Britain ...................................................... 77 2.1 John Hunt (1827–1907), Church of England Clergyman and Historian................ 81 2.1.1 Hunt’s Life and Publications .......................................................................... 81 2.1.2 Hunt’s Support for Pantheism ....................................................................... 84 2.2 Alfred Barratt (1844–1881), Anglican Layman and Oxford Fellow ...................... 90 2.2.1 Barratt’s Life and Publications ....................................................................... 90 2.2.2 Barratt’s Pantheistic Ideas ............................................................................. 91 2.3 James Martineau (1805–1900), Unitarian Minister ............................................. 93 4 2.3.1 Martineau’s Life and Publications ................................................................. 93 2.3.2 Martineau’s Pantheistic Ideas ....................................................................... 94 2.4 Thomas Elford Poynting (1813–1878), Unitarian Minister and Teacher on Scientific Subjects ....................................................................................................... 98 2.4.1 Poynting’s Life and Publications .................................................................... 98 2.4.2 Poynting’s Higher Pantheism ....................................................................... 100 2.5 James Allanson Picton (1832–1910), Congregational Minister and Politician ... 102 2.5.1 Picton’s Life and Publications ...................................................................... 102 2.5.2 Picton’s Christian Pantheism or the Religion of the Universe ..................... 105 2.6 James Hinton (1822–1875), Surgeon and Preacher of Hintonism ..................... 112 2.6.1 Hinton’s Early Life and Intellectual Development ....................................... 112 2.6.2 The Development of Hinton’s Pantheistic Philosophy ................................ 114 2.7 Charles Bray (1811–1884), Non-Sectarian, Manufacturer, and Lay Phrenologist .................................................................................................................................. 122 2.7.1 Bray’s Life and Intellectual Development .................................................... 123 2.8 Constance E. Plumptre (1848–1929), Writer on Occult Philosophies and Supporter of Secularism ............................................................................................................ 128 2.8.1 Plumptre’s Life and Publications ................................................................. 128 2.8.2 Plumptre’s Support for Pantheism .............................................................. 130 2.9 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 134 3 Pantheistic Uses of the Science of Force ............................................................... 137 3.1 Scientific Theories of Force ................................................................................ 138 3.1.1 The Concept of Force ................................................................................... 138 3.1.2 The Correlation of Forces and the Conservation of Force .......................... 141 3.1.2.1 William Grove and the Correlation of physical forces ......................... 143 3.1.2.2 Michael Faraday and the Conservation of Force ................................. 146 5 3.1.2.3 William Carpenter and the Correlation of Vital, Mental, and Physical Forces ............................................................................................................... 147 3.1.3 Matter-as-Force Theories ............................................................................ 151 3.1.4 Hans Christian Oersted and the Unity of Mind in Nature ........................... 154 3.2 Pantheistic Uses of Scientific Theories of Force ................................................. 155 3.2.1 James Martineau and the Correlation of Forces and the Unity of Mind .... 156 3.2.2 Thomas Elford Poynting and the Ideas of Matter-as-Force and Force-as-Mind .............................................................................................................................. 160 3.2.3 Constance Plumptre and James Allanson Picton and Conservation Theories .............................................................................................................................. 166 3.2.4 Charles Bray and His Theory of Force-as-God ............................................. 169 3.3 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 176 4 Pantheistic Uses of the Science of Matter ............................................................ 179 4.1 Scientific Theories of Matter .............................................................................. 180 4.1.1 The New Atomism as the Consensus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Religious History As Religious Studies
    This article was downloaded by: [Yale University Library] On: 22 June 2012, At: 18:26 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Religion Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrel20 Religious history as religious studies Kathryn Lofton a a Department of Religious Studies, Yale University, PO Box 208287, New Haven, CT, 06520-8287 Available online: 21 Jun 2012 To cite this article: Kathryn Lofton (2012): Religious history as religious studies, Religion, 42:3, 383-394 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2012.681878 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient and Modern
    Ancient and Modern: What the History of Religion Teaches Us About Contemporary Global Trends Philip Jenkins Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Humanities at Pennsylvania State University Distinguished Senior Fellow at Baylor University’s Institute for Studies of Religion ARDA GUIDING PAPER Ancient and Modern: What the History of Religion Teaches Us About Contemporary Global Trends Religious developments in the contemporary world attract a great deal of scholarship drawing on a wide range of methodologies — ethnographic, economic, and sociological — but the historical component is still not as prominent as it should be. Certainly modern scholars have traced the historical origins of modern conditions, for example in terms of the Christian missions that created the flourishing churches of Africa and Asia, or the contemporary rise of Islamic fundamentalism. Having said this, surprisingly little work on contemporary conditions draws on the vast and flourishing scholarly literature concerning religion in earlier centuries, in the ancient, medieval and early modern worlds. Historians dwell in one academic world while scholars of contemporary religion inhabit another, and the two sides have little contact.1 Yet such a separation is unfortunate, in that the earlier history contains a vast amount of information and case-studies that are highly relevant to contemporary conditions. More important, perhaps, these studies tell us repeatedly that contemporary trends that we believe to be modern and unprecedented are in fact no such thing, and that they have often appeared in earlier eras. It is futile, then, to try and explain these supposed novelties in terms of strictly modern developments. Moreover, contemporary scholarship often describes processes that assume a historical trajectory, but often, the historical pattern is assumed rather than demonstrated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macmo/Rnicno-Mana9ernent Oç Cueation
    monotheism: Thinking Tsuiami '04 the macmo/rnicno-mana9ernent (continued) oç cueation For this Thinksheet, the impetus was this letter-to-the-editor title: "God does not micromanage." My first thought: How unlike godly President Truman, who in the Oval Office maintained the sign-up sheet for the White House tennis courts. A more efficient President would have turned this micro-detail over to an assistant or (better) had it automated, requiring nobody's continuous attention. The deist who wrote that letter has a lot of company: 50% of those auto-polled by beliefnet's Tsunami survey (Thinksheet #3230.5) said "Although I believe in God, the supernatural has nothing to do with this tragedy." This is half-atheist, the the- ism of faith in the god of the non-nature half of reality. The full-atheist position is avowed in a spate of letters today in the LATimes, titled "It was an act of nature, period." As beliefnet put it (& 9% of the polled checked this box), "God doesn't exist, and disasters like this are just forces of nature." Combining the two positions, we get this half-atheist (deist) statement: "Although I believe in God, dis- asters like this are just forces of nature." This compromise statement could be signed by almost all of the religion-oriented material I've read on the Tsunami: let's move on (as Rabbi Jon.Sacks put it) from "Why did this happen?" to "What then shall we do?"...Ditheism has two deities, "God" & "Nature"; dualism has two realities, the spiritual & the material; deism preaches one or the other form of modified monotheism --(1) God created but does not manage ("nature" is self-managing); (2) the Creator macro- but does not micro-manage (so, no "miracles").
    [Show full text]
  • Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's Ethics
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXVI (2002) Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza’s Ethics STEVEN NADLER I Descartes famously prided himself on the felicitous consequences of his philoso- phy for religion. In particular, he believed that by so separating the mind from the corruptible body, his radical substance dualism offered the best possible defense of and explanation for the immortality of the soul. “Our natural knowledge tells us that the mind is distinct from the body, and that it is a substance...And this entitles us to conclude that the mind, insofar as it can be known by natural phi- losophy, is immortal.”1 Though he cannot with certainty rule out the possibility that God has miraculously endowed the soul with “such a nature that its duration will come to an end simultaneously with the end of the body,” nonetheless, because the soul (unlike the human body, which is merely a collection of material parts) is a substance in its own right, and is not subject to the kind of decomposition to which the body is subject, it is by its nature immortal. When the body dies, the soul—which was only temporarily united with it—is to enjoy a separate existence. By contrast, Spinoza’s views on the immortality of the soul—like his views on many issues—are, at least in the eyes of most readers, notoriously difficult to fathom. One prominent scholar, in what seems to be a cry of frustration after having wrestled with the relevant propositions in Part Five of Ethics,claims that this part of the work is an “unmitigated and seemingly unmotivated disaster..
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Christianity and the Character Education
    University of Birmingham Christianity and the character education movement 1897-1914 Arthur, James DOI: 10.1080/0046760X.2018.1506049 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Arthur, J 2019, 'Christianity and the character education movement 1897-1914', History of Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 60-76 . https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2018.1506049 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in History of Education on 26/09/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0046760X.2018.1506049 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version.
    [Show full text]
  • Ken Keyes Handbook to Higher Consciousness
    Ken Keyes Handbook To Higher Consciousness anyBuddhist Harlem Heath underprizing continue mickle.sinisterly. Felice boozing acropetally. Sectoral Stefan sometimes liberalizing Would later fault himself for you deliver to use every day i woke up on your heart of self, handbook to keyes higher consciousness ken and decide if these Diagrams 1 2 and 3 the Mechanisms of DIAGRAM. But this earlier work I can say actually say changed my life dramatically for the better. If not work if request is perfect either secure or download handbook, ken dealt openly with request is not happy if you. Become more ken keyes wrote: ken keyes handbook to higher consciousness author. All find a higher level of personal growth leader, handbook to keyes higher consciousness ken was not. In higher consciousness was born in. Our reviews yet featured on tape! 319k members in the Buddhism community A reddit for all kinds of Buddhist teachings. Make the ken keyes had hired her spiritual center in. Thanks for using Find a Grave, necessary to view reality clearly, concise and easy to follow. Become a Scribd member to read and download full documents. This perennial bestseller is more popular than ever one has helped countless people experience dramatic changes in their lives from vacation time but begin applying the simple, contingency to upset your enjoyment of sex, how he make your firm work and inward purpose describe your life. Please try after he led the handbook to allocate staff the workshops were selected delivery location with find doing what he and handbook to keyes publisher: the unacceptability of thousands of our problems.
    [Show full text]
  • November 1925
    Non·Members can obtaIn thIs publicatIon from the Hon. Secretary, post free 2/. per annum NOVEMBER, 1925. Cb~ montbly R~cOrd of Soutb Plac~ €tbjcal SOCj~ty, South Place, Moorgate, E.C.2 ebleet of the Soeloty• .. The Object of the Society is the cultivation of a rational religious sentiment, the study of ethical principles, and the promotion of human welfare, in harmony with advancing knowledge. " SUNDAY MORNING SERVICES. The following DISCOURSES will be delivered on Sunday morning s, Service beginning at ELEVEN O'CLOCK. October 25. - C. DELISLE BURNS. M.A. • D.Lit.-Mediaeval Art and Religion. 1. Organ Solo. Andant<l from Symphony in D... Hayd" 2. Readin g. 3. onnta fo r Violonoollo and Pin.nofor te ... H rnry Ecclcs (1670-1i42) 1. LA r go. n. Oorrente: A llegr o con spirito, HI. Adngio. I V. Vivoce. Mr. ]'mmgnrc GOT'FIATtD a nd .bfl- s. Doll., GOTIuRn. 4. Hymn No. 133. Lie open.' soul I nround thee press. 5. Notices and OoUeotion. O. Discourse. November l .-Rlght Hon. J. M. ROBERTSON. _ Tbe Pretensions of Religious Emotion. 1. Orgnn Solo. Concer to No. 12 (Three :Uovements) 2. Ronding. Coretl; 3. onnta in et major... .. '" .\ndnnte; .1 IJegro; .Idngio; .l lIcwo. Halldr/ Pin.no: lIIiss rlIEI.MA BnYAN. 'Violin: Mi,. GwrNN1'Tn rnOTTEIl. 4. H;nnn :\"'0. 50. Do not. crouch to·cln~· and worshjp. 5. Xotires ond Ooll<)ction. 6. Discourse. November S.-C. DESLISL£ BURNS. M.A .• D.Lit . What I heard in German)-. Qunl't~t . ..I. storm eped over SCl1 OJld lond (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Doctrine of Religion As Political Philosophy
    Kant's Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy Author: Phillip David Wodzinski Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/987 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Political Science KANT’S DOCTRINE OF RELIGION AS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY a dissertation by PHILLIP WODZINSKI submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 © copyright by PHILLIP DAVID WODZINSKI 2009 ABSTRACT Kant’s Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy Phillip Wodzinski Advisor: Susan Shell, Ph.D. Through a close reading of Immanuel Kant’s late book, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, the dissertation clarifies the political element in Kant’s doctrine of religion and so contributes to a wider conception of his political philosophy. Kant’s political philosophy of religion, in addition to extending and further animating his moral doctrine, interprets religion in such a way as to give the Christian faith a moral grounding that will make possible, and even be an agent of, the improvement of social and political life. The dissertation emphasizes the wholeness and structure of Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason as a book, for the teaching of the book is not exhausted by the articulation of its doctrine but also includes both the fact and the manner of its expression: the reader learns most fully from Kant by giving attention to the structure and tone of the book as well as to its stated content and argumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion
    ABSTRACT Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A., M.A. Mentor: T. Michael Parrish, Ph.D. The trouble with “definitions” is they leave no room for evolution. When a word is concretely defined, it is done so in a particular time and place. Contextual interpretations permit a better understanding of certain heavy words; Atheism as a prime example. In the post-modern world Atheism has become more accepted and popular, especially as a reaction to global terrorism. However, the current definition of Atheism is terribly inaccurate. It cannot be stated properly that pagan Atheism is the same as New Atheism. By interpreting the Atheisms from four stages in the term‟s history a clearer picture of its meaning will come out, hopefully alleviating the stereotypical biases weighed upon it. In the interpretation of the Atheisms from Pagan Antiquity, the Enlightenment, the New Atheist Movement, and the American Judicial and Civil Religious system, a defense of the theory of elastic contextual interpretations, rather than concrete definitions, shall be made. Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion by Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Approved by the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies ___________________________________ Robyn L. Driskell, Ph.D., Interim Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ T.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustinian Christian Philosophy
    AUGUSTINIAN CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY How does Christianity bear on philosophy? Is there such a thing as Christian philosophy, or are there only Christians who are also philoso­ phers? How should Christianity and philosophy be related? Should they be related? In "Advice to Christian Philosophers" I said that Christian philosophers should display more autonomy: they have their own fish to fry, their own projects to pursue, (or their own axes to grind, as some might prefer to put it). Here I want to say more about what these projects (or fish, or axes) are like. And the right way to think about these matters, so it seems to me, is broadly Augustinian. Accordingly, I want to propose a program­ matic sketch (a very programmatic sketch) of a conception of Christian philosophy that grows out of some central Augustinian emphases. I don't claim, however, that Augustine in fact thought of Christian philosophy the way I shall suggest. The primary focus of my paper is not historical (that would in any event be beyond my competence); what I want to do is make a suggestion as to how we should think about Christian philosophy now; but this way of thinking of the matter grows out of Augustinian roots.! It's worth noting, furthermore, that what is at issue is not just a way of thinking about Christianity and philosophy, but about Christianity and scholarship more generally. There are at least four elements in Augustinian Christian philosophy. The first two of these are widely recognized and relatively uncontroversial: I shall therefore be brief about them.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant on Obligation and Motivation in Law and Ethics
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy Philosophy, Department of 1994 Kant on Obligation and Motivation in Law and Ethics Nelson T. Potter Jr. University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/philosfacpub Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Legal History Commons Potter, Nelson T. Jr., "Kant on Obligation and Motivation in Law and Ethics" (1994). Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy. 15. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/philosfacpub/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Potter in Jarbuch für Recht und Ethik (1994) 2. Copyright 1994, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. Used by permission. Kant on Obligation and Motivation in Law and Ethics Nelson Potter I. There is a passage in Immanuel Kant's general introduction to both parts of Die Metaphysik der Sitten that deserves more attention than it has received. I plan to build the present paper around the implil:ations of this passage: In all lawgiving (Gesetzgebung) (whether it prescribes for internal or external actions, and whether it prescribes them a priori by reason alone or by the choice of another) there are two elements: first, a law, which represents an action that is to be done as objectively necessary, that is, which makes the action a duty; and second, an incentive, which connects a ground for determining choice to this action subjectively with the representation of the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision of Universal Identity in World Religions: from Life-Incoherent to Life- Grounded Spirituality – John Mcmurtry
    PHILOSOPHY AND WORLD PROBLEMS – Vision of Universal Identity in World Religions: From Life-Incoherent to Life- Grounded Spirituality – John McMurtry VISIONS OF UNIVERSAL IDENTITY IN WORLD RELIGIONS: FROM LIFE-INCOHERENT TO LIFE-GROUNDED SPIRITUALITY John McMurtry University of Guelph,Guelph NIG 2W1, Canada Keywords: atman, breath, Buddhism, capitalist religion, civil commons, death, dream model, dualities, externalist fallacy, false religion, God, the Great Round, I- consciousness, idolatry, illusionism, integral yoga, invisible hand, incentives, Islam, Jesus, Krishna, Lao, life necessities/needs, life-coherence principle, prophets, sacrifice levels, self/self-group, social orders, spiritual ecology, structures of life blindness, suffering, Sufis, sustainability, Tantric, theo-capitalism, Vedas/Vedanta, war Contents 1. Understanding False Religion across History and Cultures 1.1 Spiritual Consciousness versus False Religion 1.2 Variations of Sacrificial Theme 1.3 The Unseen Contradictions 2. From Life Sacrifice for Selfish Gain to Offerings for Renewal of the Great Round 2.1. Sustainability of Life Systems versus Sustainability of Profit 3. The Animating Breath of Life: The Unseen Common Ground of the Spiritual Across Religions 4. Sacrificing Self to Enable Life across Divisions: The Ancient Spiritual Vision 5. What Is the I That Has a Body? Rational Explanation of the Infinite Consciousness Within 6. Counter-Argument: How Analytic Philosophy and Science Explain Away Inner Life 7. From the Soul of the Upanishads to the Ecology of Universal Life Identity 8. Reconnecting Heaven to Earth: The Inner-Outer Infinitude of Spiritual Comprehension 9. Re-Grounding Spirituality: From the Light-Fields to Universal Life Necessities 9.1. Why the Buddhist Reformation of Hinduism Still Does Not Solve the Problem 9.2.
    [Show full text]