Aerosol generation in public restrooms Jesse H. Schreck,1, a) Masoud Jahandar Lashaki,2, b) Javad Hashemi,1, c) Manhar Dhanak,1, d) and Siddhartha Verma1, e) 1)Department of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA 2)Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA (Dated: 29 January 2021) Aerosolized droplets play a central role in the transmission of various infectious diseases, including Legionnaire’s disease, gastroenteritis-causing norovirus, and most recently COVID-19. Respiratory droplets are known to be the most prominent source of transmission for COVID-19, however, alternative routes may exist given the discovery of small numbers of viable viruses in urine and stool samples. Flushing biomatter can lead to the aerosolization of microorganisms, thus, there is a likelihood that bioaerosols generated in public restrooms may pose a concern for the transmission of COVID-19, especially since these areas are relatively confined, experience heavy foot traffic, and may suffer from inadequate ventilation. To quantify the extent of aerosolization, we measure the size and number of droplets generated by flushing toilets and urinals in a public restroom. The results indicate that the particular designs tested in the study generate a large number of droplets in the size range 0:3mm to 3mm, which can reach heights of at least 1:52m. Covering the toilet reduced aerosol levels but did not eliminate them completely, suggesting that aerosolized droplets escaped through small gaps between the cover and the seat. In addition to consistent increases in aerosol levels immediately after flushing, there was a notable rise in ambient aerosol levels due to the accumulation of droplets from multiple flushes conducted during the tests. This highlights the need for incorporating adequate ventilation in the design and operation of public spaces, which can help prevent aerosol accumulation in high occupancy areas and mitigate the risk of airborne disease transmission. I. INTRODUCTION to be clean, which indicates that infection is likely to have oc- curred via bioaerosols suspended within the restroom. The aerosolization of biomatter caused by flushing toi- In more controlled studies investigating toilet-generated lets has long been known to be a potential source of trans- aerosols, Barker & Bloomfield15 isolated salmonella bacte- mission of infectious microorganisms1,2. Toilet flushing can ria from air samples collected after flushing. Bacteria and generate large quantities of microbe-containing aerosols3 de- viruses could be isolated from settle plates for up to an hour to pending on the design and water pressure or flushing energy 90 minutes after flushing16,17, suggesting that the microorgan- of the toilet4–6. A variety of different pathogens which are isms were present in aerosolized droplets and droplet nuclei. found in stagnant water or in waste products (e.g., urine, fe- An experimental study in a hospital-based setting measured ces, and vomit) can get dispersed widely via such aerosoliza- bioaerosol generation when fecal matter was flushed by pa- tion, including the legionella bacterium responsible for caus- tients18. A significant increase in bioaerosols was observed ing Legionnaire’s disease7,8, the Ebola virus9, the norovirus right after flushing, and the droplets remained detectable for which causes severe gastroenteritis (food poisoning)10,11, and up to 30 minutes afterwards. Notably, flushing does not re- the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS- move all of the microorganisms which may be present in the CoV)12. Such airborne dispersion is suspected to have played bowl. In various studies where the toilet bowl was seeded with a key role in the outbreak of viral gastroenteritis aboard a microorganisms, sequential flushes led to a drop in microbe cruise ship, where infection was twice as prevalent among count, however, some residual microbes remained in the bowl passengers who used shared toilets compared to those who even after up to 24 flushes2,15,16,19,20. In some cases, resid- had private bathrooms13. Similarly, transmission of norovirus ual microbial contamination was shown to persist in biofilm via aerosolized droplets was linked to the occurrence of vom- formed within the toilet bowl for several days to weeks15. iting or diarrhea within an aircraft restroom14, as passengers In an effort to reduce aerosol dispersal, certain studies con- and crew who got infected were more likely to have visited ducted measurements with the toilet seat lid closed16,17. Clos- restrooms than those that were not infected. The participants ing the lid led to a decrease, but not a complete absence of bac- arXiv:2101.11990v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 28 Jan 2021 in the study reported that all of the restroom surfaces appeared teria recovered from air samples. This suggests that smaller aerosolized droplets were able to escape through the gap be- tween the seat and the lid. In addition to the experiment-based studies mentioned here, numerical simulations have been used a)Electronic mail: [email protected] recently to investigate the ejection of aerosolized particles b)Electronic mail: [email protected] c) from toilets and urinals, specifically in the context of COVID- Electronic mail: [email protected] 21,22 d)Electronic mail: [email protected] 19 transmission . e)Electronic mail: [email protected]; http://www.computation.fau.edu; Also The issue of aerosolization is particularly acute for viruses at Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort compared to bacteria, given their different response to lev- Pierce, FL 34946, USA els of relative-humidity (RH). High RH levels result in slower 2 evaporation of aerosolized droplets, whereas lower levels ac- RNA has been found in urine even after the virus is no longer celerate the phenomenon, leading to the formation of ex- detectable in respiratory swabs40. tremely small droplet nuclei which can remain airborne for These findings suggest that the aerosolization of biomat- long periods of time and can deposit deep into the lungs23,24. ter could play a potential role in the transmission of SARS- Various studies have indicated that the viability of bacteria de- CoV-2, which is known to remain viable in aerosol form48,49. creases at low RH levels25,26, which makes them less likely to Environmental samples taken by Ding et al.50 in a hospital retain their infectivity in droplet nuclei form. On the other designated specifically for COVID-19 patients indicated high hand, viruses exhibit lowest viability at intermediate RH lev- prevalence of the virus within bathrooms used by the patients, els, and retain their viability at either low or high RH val- both on surfaces and in air samples. The authors hypothe- ues26–30, making them more likely to remain intact in droplet sized that aerosolized fecal matter may have dispersed the nuclei which can stay suspended from hours to days. Viruses virus within the bathroom, since viral samples were not de- are also more likely to aerosolize easily, as indicated by Lee at tected on surfaces in the patients’ rooms. al.31 who used wastewater sludge (both synthetic and real) to Given the potential role of aerosolized biomatter in spread- demonstrate that when viruses were seeded into the sludge, ing a wide variety of gastrointestinal and respiratory illnesses, 94% stayed mobile in the liquid phase while only a small we investigate droplet generation from toilets and urinals in a fraction adhered to the solid biomatter or to the surfaces of public restroom operating under normal ventilation condition. the toilet. This suggests that the presence of solid biomatter, We examine the size, number, and various heights to which which is more difficult to aerosolize, might not reduce the po- the droplets rise when generated by the flushing water. The tential for virus transmission since they are more likely to get main aim is to better understand the risk of infection trans- aerosolized with the liquid phase. mission that the droplets pose in public restrooms, since these Apart from gastrointestinal diseases, viruses associated relatively confined locations often experience heavy foot traf- with respiratory illnesses have also been detected in patients’ fic. The experimental methodology is described in Section II stool and urine samples. For instance, the SARS-CoV (Se- followed by results and discussion in Section III and conclu- vere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus) responsible sion in Section IV. for the SARS outbreak of 2003 was found in patients’ urine and stool specimens for longer than 4 weeks32. Similarly, recent studies have confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 II. METHODS (the virus associated with COVID-19) viral RNA in patients’ 33–38 stool samples , even if they did not experience gastroin- The flush-generated aerosol measurements were recorded testinal symptoms and regardless of the severity of their res- in a medium sized restroom on the university campus, con- 34,35,39,40 piratory symptoms . Surprisingly, viral RNA could sisting of 3 bathroom cubicles, 6 urinals, and 3 sinks. The be detected in feces for several days to weeks after it was no restroom was deep cleaned and closed twenty four hours prior longer detectable in respiratory samples from nasal and oral to conducting the experiments, with the ventilation system 33–35,38 41 swabs . Moreover, Wu et al. recovered large quan- operating normally to remove any aerosols generated during tities of viral RNA from urban wastewater treatment facili- cleaning. The temperature and relative humidity within the ties. The levels detected were several orders of magnitude restroom were measured to be 21◦C and 52%, respectively. higher than would be expected for the number of clinically For the measurements reported here, one particular toilet and confirmed cases in the region, which suggests that there was a one urinal were selected, both equipped with flushometer type high prevalence of asymptomatic and undetected cases.