Lycoming County Women's History Curriculum Guide Chronology Of
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Central New York State Women's Suffrage Timeline
Central New York State WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE TIMELINE Photo – courtesy of http://humanitiesny.org TIMELINE OF EVENTS IN SECURING WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE IN CENTRAL NEW YORK STATE A. Some New York State developments prior to the July 1848 Seneca Falls Convention B. The Seneca Falls Convention C. Events 1850 – 1875 and 1860s New York State Map D. Events 1875 – 1893 Symbols E 1-2. Women’s Suffrage and the Erie Canal. Events around F-1. 1894 Ithaca Convention Ithaca, New York F-2. 1894 Ithaca Convention (continued) Curiosities G. Events 1895 – 1900 H. Events 1900 – 1915 I. Events 1915 – 1917 – Final Steps to Full Women’s Suffrage in New York J. Events Following Women’s Suffrage in New York 1918 – 1925 K. Resources New York State Pioneer Feminists: Elizabeth Cady Stanton & Susan Brownell Anthony. Photo – courtesy of http://www.assembly.state.ny.us A. SOME NEW YORK STATE DEVELOPMENTS PRIOR TO THE JULY 1848 SENECA FALLS CONVENTION • 1846 – New York State constitutional convention received petitions from at least three different counties Abigail Bush did NOT calling for women’s right to vote. attend the Seneca Falls convention. Lucretia Mott 1846 – Samuel J. May, Louisa May Alcott’s uncle, and a Unitarian minister and radical abolitionist from • was the featured speaker Syracuse, New York, vigorously supported Women’s Suffrage in a sermon that was later widely at the Seneca Falls circulated. convention. • April, 1848 – Married Women’s Property Act Passed. • May, 1848 – Liberty Party convention in Rochester, New York approved a resolution calling for “universal suffrage in its broadest sense, including women as well as men.” • Summer 1848 – Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Staton, and Matilda Joslyn Gage were all inspired in their suffrage efforts by the clan mothers of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Nation of New York State. -
View of the Many Ways in Which the Ohio Move Ment Paralled the National Movement in Each of the Phases
INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While tf.; most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in "sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. -
The 19Th Amendment
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Women Making History: The 19th Amendment Women The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. —19th Amendment to the United States Constitution In 1920, after decades of tireless activism by countless determined suffragists, American women were finally guaranteed the right to vote. The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment. It was ratified by the states on August 18, 1920 and certified as an amendment to the US Constitution on August 26, 1920. Developed in partnership with the National Park Service, this publication weaves together multiple stories about the quest for women’s suffrage across the country, including those who opposed it, the role of allies and other civil rights movements, who was left behind, and how the battle differed in communities across the United States. Explore the complex history and pivotal moments that led to ratification of the 19th Amendment as well as the places where that history happened and its continued impact today. 0-31857-0 Cover Barcode-Arial.pdf 1 2/17/20 1:58 PM $14.95 ISBN 978-1-68184-267-7 51495 9 781681 842677 The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department Front cover: League of Women Voters poster, 1920. of the Interior. It preserves unimpaired the natural and Back cover: Mary B. Talbert, ca. 1901. cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work future generations. -
Woodrow Wilson's Conversion Experience: the President and the Federal Woman Suffrage Amendment Beth Behn University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected]
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 2-2012 Woodrow Wilson's Conversion Experience: The President and the Federal Woman Suffrage Amendment Beth Behn University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Behn, Beth, "Woodrow Wilson's Conversion Experience: The rP esident and the Federal Woman Suffrage Amendment" (2012). Open Access Dissertations. 511. https://doi.org/10.7275/e43w-h021 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/511 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WOODROW WILSON’S CONVERSION EXPERIENCE: THE PRESIDENT AND THE FEDERAL WOMAN SUFFRAGE AMENDMENT A Dissertation Presented by BETH A. BEHN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2012 Department of History © Copyright by Beth A. Behn 2012 All Rights Reserved WOODROW WILSON’S CONVERSION EXPERIENCE: THE PRESIDENT AND THE FEDERAL WOMAN SUFFRAGE AMENDMENT A Dissertation Presented by BETH A. BEHN Approved as to style and content by: _________________________________ Joyce Avrech Berkman, Chair _________________________________ Gerald Friedman, Member _________________________________ David Glassberg, Member _________________________________ Gerald McFarland, Member ________________________________________ Joye Bowman, Department Head Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would never have completed this dissertation without the generous support of a number of people. It is a privilege to finally be able to express my gratitude to many of them. -
Florence Brooks Whitehouse and Maine's Vote to Ratify Women's
Maine History Volume 46 Number 1 Representing Maine Article 4 10-1-2011 Florence Brooks Whitehouse and Maine’s Vote to Ratify Women’s Suffrage in 1919 Anne Gass Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal Part of the Social History Commons, United States History Commons, Women's History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Gass, Anne. "Florence Brooks Whitehouse and Maine’s Vote to Ratify Women’s Suffrage in 1919." Maine History 46, 1 (2011): 38-66. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/vol46/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Florence Brooks Whitehouse was a prominent suffrage leader in Maine in the 1910s. Originally a member of the Maine Woman Suffrage Association, White- house became the leader of the Maine branch of the National Woman’s Party, which used more radical tactics and espoused immediate and full suffrage for women. Courtesy of the Sewall-Belmont House & Museum, Washington DC. FLORENCE BROOKS WHITEHOUSE AND MAINE’S VOTE TO RATIFY WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE IN 1919 BY ANNE GASS In 1919, Maine faced an unusual conflict between ratifying the nine- teenth amendment to the United States Constitution that would grant full voting rights to women, and approving a statewide suffrage referen- dum that would permit women to vote in presidential campaigns only. Maine’s pro-suffrage forces had to head off last-minute efforts by anti- suffragists to sabotage the Maine legislature’s ratification vote. -
Nomination Form
2014 Hall of Fame of Delaware Women PURPOSE: The Delaware Commission for Women is seeking remarkable women to induct into the Hall of Fame of Delaware Women. This prestigious annual event proclaims, acknowledges and celebrates the contributions and achievements of women. Nominees are women who worked to improve the quality of life in their neighborhoods, community, city, state, nation or internationally. rd 33 ELIGIBILITY: Hall of Fame Nominees must have made an important impact upon the lives of others. of Delaware Their contributions must have lasting, significant value and meaning. Women Distinguished, selfless achievements may also be the basis for selection. Nominees must be native-born Delawareans or have resided in the state for at least ten years. If is deceased, the same requirements apply. (Add date of death below for posthumous nominations only) THE PROCESS: 1. Nominators complete this form and are responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information submitted on this form. (Please do not write by hand.) 2. A selection committee reviews and rates the forms, then selects the inductee(s). NOMINATION 3. All nominators and nominees are notified in writing. FORM 4. A public award ceremony and reception is planned, inductees become permanent members of the Hall of Fame of Delaware Women. NOMINEE INFORMATION: Full Name: Volunteers Home Address: ________________________________________________________________ Humanitarians Professionals City: State:_ Zip: Homemakers Work Phone: _________________ Home Phone: Advocates Role models E-mail:______________________ Cell Phone: _ Heroines Birth Place:________________ _ Name of Nearest Living Relative: Relative’s Relationship to Nominee: Relative’s Address: Phone / Cell: E-mail/ Web: Only nominations received on or before NOMINATOR INFORMATION: Friday, Nov. -
Parades, Pickets, and Prison: Alice Paul and the Virtues of Unruly Constitutional Citizenship
PARADES, PICKETS, AND PRISON: ALICE PAUL AND THE VIRTUES OF UNRULY CONSTITUTIONAL CITIZENSHIP Lynda G. Dodd* INTRODUCTION: MODELS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CITIZENSHIP For all the recent interest in “popular constitutionalism,” constitutional theorists have devoted surprisingly little attention to the habits and virtues of citizenship that constitutional democracies must cultivate, if they are to flourish.1 In my previous work, I have urged scholars of constitutional politics to look beyond judicial review and other more traditional checks and balances intended to prevent governmental misconduct, in order to examine the role of “citizen plaintiffs”2 – individuals who, typically at great personal cost in a legal culture where the odds are stacked against them, attempt to enforce their rights in * 1 For some exceptions, see Walter F. Murphy, CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY: CREATING AND MAINTAINING A JUST POLITICAL ORDER (2007); JAMES E. FLEMING, SECURING CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY: THE CASE FOR AUTONOMY (2006); Wayne D. Moore, Constitutional Citizenship in CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS: ESSAYS ON CONSTITUTIONAL MAKING, MAINTENANCE, AND CHANGE (Sotirios A. Barber and Robert P. George, eds. 2001); Paul Brest, Constitutional Citizenship, 34 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 175 (1986). 2 Under this model of citizenship, the citizen plaintiff is participating in the process of constitutional checks and balances. That participation can be described in terms of “enforcing” constitutional norms or “protesting” the government’s departure from them. The phrase “private attorneys general” is the traditional term used to describe citizen plaintiffs. See, e.g., David Luban, Taking Out the Adversary: The Assault on Progressive Public Interest Lawyers, 91 CAL. L. REV. 209 (2003); Pamela Karlan, Disarming the Private Attorney General, 2003 U. -
Helping Women to Recover: Creating Gender-Specific Treatment for Substance-Abusing Women and Girls in Community Correctional Settings
Helping Women to Recover: Creating Gender-Specific Treatment for Substance-Abusing Women and Girls in Community Correctional Settings Stephanie S. Covington, Ph.D., LCSW Co-Director, Center for Gender and Justice La Jolla, California Presented at: International Community Corrections Association Arlington, Virginia 1998 Published in: In M. McMahon, ed., Assessment to Assistance: Programs for Women in Community Corrections. Latham, Md.: American Correctional Association, 2000, 171-233. Some of the most neglected and misunderstood women and girls in North America are those in the criminal justice system. Largely because of the “War on Drugs,” the rate of incarceration for women in the United States has tripled since 1980 (Bloom , Chesney- Lind, & Owen., 1994; Collins & Collins, 1996). Between 1986 and 1991, the number of women in state prisons for drug-related offenses increased by 432 percent (Phillips & Harm, 1998). Like their juvenile counterparts, most of these women are non-violent offenders who could be treated much more effectively and economically in community- based gender-specific programs. When females are not a security risk, community-based sanctions offer benefits to society, to female offenders1 themselves, and to their children. One survey compares an $869 average annual cost for probation to $14,363 for jail and $17,794 for prison (Phillips & Harm, 1998). Community corrections disrupt females’ lives less than does incarceration and subject them to less isolation. Further, community corrections potentially disrupt the lives of children far less. Unfortunately, few drug treatment programs exist that address the needs of females, especially those with minor children. This is unfortunate because, when allied with probation, electronic monitoring, community service, and/or work release, community-based substance abuse treatment could be an effective alternative to the spiraling rates of recidivism and re-incarceration. -
Woman Suffrage
Rare Book Miscellany: WOMAN SUFFRAGE On-Line Only: Catalog # 223 Second Life Books Inc. ABAA- ILAB P.O. Box 242, 55 Quarry Road Lanesborough, MA 01237 413-447-8010 fax: 413-499-1540 Email: [email protected] Rare Book Miscellany: WOMAN SUFFRAGE On-Line Only Catalog # 223 Terms : All books are fully guaranteed and returnable within 7 days of receipt. Massachusetts residents please add 5% sales tax. Postage is additional. Libraries will be billed to their requirements. Deferred billing available upon request. We accept MasterCard, Visa and American Express. ALL ITEMS ARE IN VERY GOOD OR BETTER CONDITION , EXCEPT AS NOTED . Orders may be made by mail, email, phone or fax to: Second Life Books, Inc. P. O. Box 242, 55 Quarry Road Lanesborough, MA. 01237 Phone (413) 447-8010 Fax (413) 499-1540 Email:[email protected] Search all our books at our web site: www.secondlifebooks.com Item 140 1. ALGEO, Sara M. THE STORY OF A SUB PIONEER. Providence: Snow & Farnham, (1925). First Edition. 8vo, 318 pp. Illustrated throughout with 91 half-tones. 1/1000 numbered copies. This is #90, one of the 200 reserved for the author's fellow suffragists. This is an ex-library copy with the bookplate of a MA library. Corners of front and rear blanks cropped. Krichmar 1412. [24699] $125.00 Covers the period 1908-1920: the RI suffrage bill, etc. Algeo was in the RI Woman Suffrage Party and active in the national organizing campaign. This is a first hand account of the suffrage fight by an activist. 2. ALGEO, Sara M. -
Suffrage Organizations Chart.Indd
U.S. WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE ORGANIZATIONS 1 National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA), American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA), 1869 - 1890 1869 - 1890 “The National” “The American” Key Leaders Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Lucy Stone, Henry Browne Blackwell, Julia Ward Howe, Mott, Matilda Joslyn Gage, Anna Howard Shaw Mary Livermore, Henry Ward Beecher Key Facts • Headquartered in New York City • Headquartered in Boston • Started The Revolution, a newspaper that focused • Established the Woman’s Journal, a successful on a range of women’s issues, including suffrage suffrage newspaper o Funded by a pro-slavery man, George o Funded by subscriptions Francis Train • Permitted both men and women to be a part of • Men were able to join the organization as organization and leadership members but women controlled the leadership • Considered more moderate • Considered radical and controversial Key Stances & • Against the 15th Amendment • Supported the 15th Amendment and the Republican Strategies • Sought a national amendment guaranteeing Party women’s suffrage • Adopted a state-by-state strategy to win suffrage • Held their conventions in Washington, D.C • Held their conventions in various cities across the • Advocated for women’s right to education and country divorce and for equal pay • Supported traditional social institutions, such as • Argued for the vote to be given to the “educated” marriage and religion • Willing to work with anyone as long as they • Unwilling to work with polygamous women and championed women’s rights and suffrage others considered radical, for fear of alienating the o Leadership allowed Mormon polygamist public women to join the organization • Employed less militant lobbying tactics, such as • Made attempts to vote in various places across the petition drives, testifying before legislatures, and country even though it was considered illegal giving public speeches © Better Days 2020 U.S. -
Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875
Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875 By Ashley Theresa Rubin A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Malcolm Feeley, Chair Professor Cybelle Fox Professor Calvin Morrill Professor Jonathan Simon Spring 2013 Copyright c 2013 Ashley Theresa Rubin All rights reserved Abstract Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875 by Ashley Theresa Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Malcolm Feeley, Chair I examine the puzzling case of Eastern State Penitentiary and its long-term retention of a unique mode of confinement between 1829 and 1875. Most prisons built in the nineteenth cen- tury followed the “Auburn System” of congregate confinement in which inmates worked daily in factory-like settings and retreated at night to solitary confinement. By contrast, Eastern State Penitentiary (f. 1829, Philadelphia) followed the “Pennsylvania System” of separate confinement in which each inmate was confined to his own cell for the duration of his sentence, engaging in workshop-style labor and receiving religious ministries, education, and visits from selected person- nel. Between 1829 and the 1860s, Eastern faced strong pressures to conform to field-wide norms and adopt the Auburn System. As the progenitor of the Pennsylvania System, Eastern became the target of a debate raging over the appropriate model of “prison discipline.” Supporters of the Auburn System (penal reformers and other prisons’ administrators) propagated calumnious myths, arguing that the Pennsylvania System was cruel and inhumane, dangerous to inmates’ physical and mental health, too expensive, and simply impractical and ineffective. -
Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women's Rights Movement
Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women’s Rights Movement PIVOTAL MOMENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY Series Editors David Hackett Fischer James M. McPherson James T. Patterson Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy Maury Klein Rainbow’s End: The Crash of 1929 James M. McPherson Crossroads of Freedom: The Battle of Antietam Glenn C. Altschuler All Shook Up: How Rock ’n’ Roll Changed America David Hackett Fischer Washington’s Crossing John Ferling Adams vs. Jefferson: The Tumultuous Election of 1800 Colin G. Calloway The Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America Joel H. Silbey Storm over Texas: The Annexation Controversy and the Road to Civil War Raymond Arsenault Freedom Riders: 1961 and the Struggle for Racial Justice Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women’s Rights Movement 32 Sally G. McMillen 1 2008 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright # 2008 by Sally G. McMillen Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.