Northolt Town Centre's Historic Walk
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Greenford Square, London Ub6
TWO GREENFORD SQUARE A self-contained office and education facility GREENFORD SQUARE, LONDON UB6 0HE (dual D1 & B1 use), set in a six acre landscaped From 9,418 sq ft - 97,028 sq ft campus, offering secure on-site car parking, with excellent transport links into central London. BUILDING OVERVIEW Two Greenford Square is set in a six Only a 9 minute walk to Sudbury Hill • Dual D1 & B1 use. acre, multi-use, campus providing an tube (Piccadilly Line) and overground • HQ Campus of 97,028 sq ft. attractive working environment within station, with direct connections to a landscaped setting. London Marylebone in just 16 minutes. TO LET • Self-contained options for 28,269 sq ft and 68,759 sq ft. The building is adjacent to the Ferrero Within an 8 minute walk from Greenford UK HQ and the mixed-use Greystar tube (Central Line) and overground • 275 car parking spaces at a regeneration, Greenford Quay. station, with direct links to West Ealing ratio of 1:353 sq ft. in only 11 minutes, one of five Crossrail stations that the London Borough of Ealing has to offer. 01 VEHICLE ACCESS OLDFIELD LANE NORTH FERRERO UK & IRELAND HQ 275 SPACE CAR PARK VEHICLE ACCESS B E PEDESTRIAN R K E ACCESS L E Y A V E N U E A4127 D A O R D R O F N E E R G GREENFORD QUAY REDEVELOPMENT 1,965 NEW HOMES AND 200,000 SQ FT OF COMMERCIAL ACCOMMODATION 02 Greystar is creating a new canal-side neighbourhood, • 1,965 residential units and 200,000 sq ft of • High-quality and well-managed public which is inclusive of the surrounding community and retail and commercial space. -
GUNNERSBURY PARK Options Appraisal
GUNNERSBURY PARK Options Appraisal Report By Jura Consultants and LDN Architects June 2009 LDN Architects 16 Dublin Street Edinburgh EH1 3RE 0131 556 8631 JURA CONSULTANTS www.ldn.co.uk 7 Straiton View Straiton Business Park Loanhead Midlothian Edinburgh Montagu Evans LLP EH20 9QZ Clarges House 6-12 Clarges Street TEL. 0131 440 6750 London, W1J 8HB FAX. 0131 440 6751 [email protected] 020 7493 4002 www.jura-consultants.co.uk www.montagu-evans.co.uk CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary i. 1. Introduction 1. 2. Background 5. 3. Strategic Context 17. 4. Development of Options and Scenarios 31. 5. Appraisal of Development Scenarios 43. 6. Options Development 73. 7. Enabling Development 87. 8. Preferred Option 99. 9. Conclusions and Recommendations 103. Appendix A Stakeholder Consultations Appendix B Training Opportunities Appendix C Gunnersbury Park Covenant Appendix D Other Stakeholder Organisations Appendix E Market Appraisal Appendix F Conservation Management Plan The Future of Gunnersbury Park Consultation to be conducted in the Summer of 2009 refers to Options 1, 2, 3 and 4. These options relate to the options presented in this report as follows: Report Section 6 Description Consultation Option A Minimum Intervention Option 1 Option B Mixed Use Development Option 2 Option C Restoration and Upgrading Option 4 Option D Destination Development Option 3 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction A study team led by Jura Consultants with LDN Architects and Montagu Evans was commissioned by Ealing and Hounslow Borough Councils to carry out an options appraisal for Gunnersbury Park. Gunnersbury Park is situated within the London Borough of Hounslow and is unique in being jointly owned by Ealing and Hounslow. -
The Canal & River Trust
2020 Statement of Common Ground: The Canal & River Trust LOCAL PLAN 2019 - 2041 PLANNING POLICY TEAM LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT | Brent Civic Centre, Engineers Way, HA9 0FJ Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 Sign Off .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Strategic Geography................................................................................................................................ 3 Strategic Matters .................................................................................................................................... 3 Active Transport Route ....................................................................................................................... 3 Open Space and Biodiversity .............................................................................................................. 3 Heritage ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Freight ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Flooding............................................................................................................................................... 4 Heating and Cooling -
A31 Note: Gunnersbury Station Does Not Have OWER H91 E D
C R S D E A U T S A VE N E R A N B B D L W Based on Bartholomews mapping. Reproduced by permission of S R E i N U st A R O HarperCollins Publishers Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow. 2013Y ri E E A Y c W R A t D A AD www.bartholomewmaps.com N C R 272 O Y V L D R i TO T AM 272 OL E H D BB N n A O CAN CO By Train e N Digital Cartography by Pindar Creative N U L E n w i a L Getting to BSI m lk 5 i AVE 1 ng N A Acton0- t V 1 im • The London Overground runs between E t e e LD ROAD B491 D N a SOUTHFIE E Y Town fr R Address: Chiswick Tower, U imR B o B E U O 440 m Richmond and Stratford stopping at Travel to E x L D B A R o S L AD R r O E RO O s 389 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 4AL Y R G R E p EY L i SPELDHUR Gunnersbury. ID ST R A R R t RO M p NR B E A O N e D NU O H L A A UB E LL C D GS BO T Y British Standards 1 R E RSET E E 9 N L SOM T N All visitors must enter the building through F 44 U N H • The ‘Hounslow Loop’ has stations at G SOUTH ROAD BEDFORD B E3 E B E R the main entrance on Chiswick High Road O Kew Bridge, Richmond, Weybridge, N O L PARK D Institution S ACTON L A A A D N E O R E O D and report to Reception on arrival. -
LICENSING SUB COMMITTEE Fairway Pavilion, West Middlesex Golf Club, Greenford Road, Southall (Dormers Wells Ward)
Ealing Council Democratic Services Officer: Town Hall Lee Teasdale New Broadway tel: 020 8825 7919 London W5 2BY fax: 020 8825 6909 e-mail: [email protected] LICENSING SUB COMMITTEE Fairway Pavilion, West Middlesex Golf Club, Greenford Road, Southall (Dormers Wells Ward) nd Date: Wednesday, 2P P March 2016 Time: 4pm or upon conclusion of the previous hearing Venue: Liz Cantell Room , Ealing Town Hall MEMBERSHIP: Councillors Kate Crawford, Munir Ahmed and Roz Reece. AGENDA 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Urgent Matters Any urgent matters that the Chair has agreed should be considered. 3. Matters to be Considered in Private 4. Declarations of Interest 5. Opposed Variation to a Premises Licence Fairway Pavilion, West Middlesex Golf Club, Greenford Road, Southall MARTIN SMITH CHIEF EXECUTIVE rd 23P PPP February 2016 SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE FOR LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE HEARINGS 1. The procedure to be followed at Licensing Sub Committee Hearings will be outlined by the Chairman at the beginning of each hearing. 2. Parties to the hearing can be represented by a friend or legal adviser who acts as their spokesperson. 3. The procedure to be followed is summarised* below and will generally be followed although the procedure may be varied at the Chair’s discretion • The Licensing Officer will introduce the Report and provide clarification on any factual issues. • The applicant will present the application and call any witnesses in respect of whom permission to appear has been given and answer any questions put to them. • Those who have made relevant representations will make their representations and call any witnesses in respect of whom permission to appear has been given and answer any questions put to them. -
Park Royal Opportunity Area Planning Framework Part B
PAGE106 Mayor of London Chapter 10 Park Royal proposals 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Central Park Royal 10.3 The Northern Gateway and Alperton 10.4 The Western Gateway 10.5 The Southern Gateway 10.6 The Eastern Gateway 10.7 Neighbourhood Centre the Heart of Park Royal PAGE107 10.1 Introduction OBJECTIVE 1 Protect and maintain Park Royal as the largest industrial employment location in London, Park Royal, together with Willesden The OAPF proposes to intensify commercial supporting the clusters of food/drink, Junction, extends to 700 hectares. It development on under utilised sites across Park distribution/logistics and TV/film through accommodates a range of employment Royal. Regeneration must continue to ensure the facilities and services to support growth. estate functions as a prime location for business uses from manufacturing to in London. Some sites have planning guidance; distribution/logistics and TV/film, with others have site-specific allocations in LDFs. OBJECTIVE 6 approximately 2,000 businesses and The OAPF identifies four gateways, and a Improve access to Park Royal at the four Gateways, employing around 40,000 people. Neighbourhood Centre at the heart of Park Royal. Alperton, Old Oak and Kensal Canalside and secure London Plan policy 5F.2 identifies Park These areas have the capacity to accommodate successful redevelopment of major sites to deliver a more intense form of mixed-use development employment-led growth, high quality amenities and Royal as an Opportunity Area with a of approximately 294,849 sq.m. of mix commercial a better environment. target to accommodate 11,000 new jobs and 500 new homes over the next uses and all of the proposed 3,500 residential units. -
Air Quality in Ealing: a Guide for Public Health
AIR QUALITY IN EALING: A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Ealing COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4531 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Ealing CONTENTS Description Page How to use this document 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Air Pollution 3 2.1 External air pollution 3 2.2 Internal air pollution 6 3 Air Quality in LB Ealing 8 4 Air quality impacts on health 12 4.1 Premature deaths 12 4.2 Vulnerable groups 13 4.3 Air pollution and deprivation 14 4.4 The Public Health Outcomes Framework 15 5 Health impacts in LB Ealing 17 6 Co-benefits of improving air quality in London 20 6.1 Maximising the health benefits from improving air quality 20 6.2 Cost of the impact of Air Pollution 21 7 Policy and legal framework for improving air quality 23 7.1 EU Directive 23 7.2 UK air quality policy 23 7.3 Regional strategies 24 7.4 Local Authority responsibilities 26 8 Taking action 27 8.1 Actions taken by the Mayor 27 8.2 Borough level action 28 8.3 Individual action 30 9 Next steps 32 10 References 33 11 Glossary 35 12 Appendices 40 Appendix 1 – Annual mean concentration of pollutants 40 Appendix 2 – National air quality objectives 41 Appendix 3 – Actions for Londoners to mitigate and adapt to air pollution 43 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Ealing HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Air quality is an important Public Health issue in London, it contributes to shortening the life expectancy of all Londoners, disproportionately impacting on the most vulnerable. -
30Hr Childcare: Analysis of Potential Demand and Sufficiency in Ealing
30hr Childcare: Analysis of potential demand and sufficiency in Ealing. Summer 2016 Introduction: Calculating the number of eligible children in each Ward of the borough The methodology utilised by the DfE to predict the number of eligible children in the borough cannot be replicated at Ward level (refer to page 14: Appendix 1 for DfE methodology) Therefore the calculations for the borough have been calculated utilising the most recent data at Ward level concerning the proportions of parents working, the estimates of 3& 4 year population and the number of those 4yr old ineligible as they are attending school. The graph below illustrates the predicted lower and upper estimates for eligible 3&4 year olds for each Ward Page 1 of 15 Executive Summary The 30hr eligibility criteria related to employment, income and the number of children aged 4 years attending reception class (who are ineligible for the funding) makes it much more likely that eligible children will be located in Wards with higher levels of employment and income (potentially up to a joint household income of £199,998) and lower numbers of children aged 4years in reception class. Although the 30hr. childcare programme may become an incentive to work in the future, in terms of the immediate capital bid, the data points to investment in areas which are quite different than the original proposal, which targeted the 5 wards within the Southall area. The 5 Southall Wards are estimated to have the fewest number of eligible children for the 30hr programme. The top 5 Wards estimated to have the highest number of eligible children are amongst the least employment and income deprived Wards in Ealing with the lowest numbers of children affected by income deprivation. -
CPZ OH Old Hanwell
LONDON BOROUGH OF EALING REVISED PROPOSALS FOR CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE OH IN THE OLD HANWELL AREA The Ealing (Old Hanwell - Zone OH) (Residents Parking Places) Order 202* The Ealing (Parking Places) (Telephone Parking) (Old Hanwell - Zone OH) Order 202* The Ealing (Waiting and Loading Restriction) (Special Parking Area) (Amendment No. **) Order 202* 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the London Borough of Ealing Council, in connection with the provision of a controlled parking zone in the Old Hanwell area, propose to make the above-mentioned Orders under sections 6, 45, 46, 49 and 124 of and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as amended by the Local Government Act 1985. The orders revise the hours of the proposed controlled zone in Old Hanwell to 8am-10am, 1pm-3pm and 6pm-8pm on Mondays to Fridays inclusive 2. The general effect of the Residents Parking Places Order would be to: (a) revise the operational times of the proposed parking places for the use of residents, their visitors and business users in lengths of Belvedere Road, Billets Hart Close, Bishops Road, Bostonthorpe Road, Churchfield Road W7, Du Burstow Terrace, Green Lane, Humes Avenue, Lambourn Close, Lower Boston Road, Osterley Park View Road, Rosebank Road, Rosedale Close, St Dunstans Road, St Margarets Road, St Mark’s Road, Studley Grange Road, The Heath, Townholm Crescent and Trumpers Way. (b) place the bays in Bostonthorpe Road between Bishops Road and st Marks Road on the west side of the road; (c) provide additional permit holder parking in St Margaret -
Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd
T H A M E S V A L L E Y ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S The Rectory, Tentelow Lane, Norwood Green, Southall, London Borough of Ealing Archaeological Evaluation by Daniel Bray Site Code: NGS15/222 (TQ 1344 7850) The Rectory, Tentelow Lane, Norwood Green, Southall, London Borough of Ealing An Archaeological Evaluation for CgMs Consulting by Daniel Bray Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code NGS15/222 October 2015 Summary Site name: The Rectory, Tentelow Lane, Norwood Green, Southall, London Borough of Ealing Grid reference: TQ 1344 7850 Site activity: Archaeological Evaluation Date and duration of project: 28th September 2015 Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Daniel Bray Site code: NGS 15/222 Area of site: 0.98ha Summary of results: The evaluation revealed a small quantity of archaeological features. A medieval ditch and possible pit were revealed along with an undated posthole, possible post- medieval ditch and possible remains of a 19th century building along with a modern truncation and services. Location and reference of archive: The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited at The Museum of London in due course. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. All TVAS unpublished fieldwork reports are available on our website: www.tvas.co.uk/reports/reports.asp. Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford 01.10.15 Steve Preston 01.10.15 i Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR Tel. -
Marine Mammal Noise Exposure Criteria: Updated Scientific Recommendations for Residual Hearing Effects Brandon L
Aquatic Mammals 2019, 45(2), 125-232, DOI 10.1578/AM.45.2.2019.125 Marine Mammal Noise Exposure Criteria: Updated Scientific Recommendations for Residual Hearing Effects Brandon L. Southall,1, 2 James J. Finneran,3 Colleen Reichmuth,2 Paul E. Nachtigall,4 Darlene R. Ketten,5, 6 Ann E. Bowles,7 William T. Ellison,8 Douglas P. Nowacek,9, 10 and Peter L. Tyack5, 11 1Southall Environmental Associates, Inc., 9099 Soquel Drive #8, Aptos, CA 95003, USA E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Marine Sciences, Long Marine Laboratory, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 3U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific, Code 71510, 53560 Hull Street, San Diego, CA 92152, USA 4Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, 46-007 Lilipuna Road, Kaneohe, HI 96744, USA 5Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 6Harvard Medical School, Department of Otology and Laryngology, Boston, MA 02114, USA 7Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute, 2595 Ingraham Street, San Diego, CA 92109, USA 8Marine Acoustics, Inc., 2 Corporate Place, Middletown, RI 02840, USA 9 Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA 10Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA 11Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, Scotland This publication is dedicated with great respect and admiration to Dr. Jeanette Thomas who was an original panel member, valued colleague, and dear friend. Jeanette was a champion of marine mammal science who set higher standards for all in terms of scholarship, integrity, and professionalism. -
2021 First Teams - Premier Division Fixtures
2021 First Teams - Premier Division Fixtures Brondesbury vs. North Middlesex North Middlesex vs. Brondesbury Sat. 8 May Richmond vs. Twickenham Sat. 10 July Twickenham vs. Richmond Overs games Teddington vs. Ealing Time games Ealing vs. Teddington 12.00 starts Crouch End vs. Shepherds Bush 11.00 starts Shepherds Bush vs. Crouch End Finchley vs. Hampstead Hampstead vs. Finchley Shepherds Bush vs. Richmond Richmond vs. Shepherds Bush Sat. 15 May Ealing vs. Brondesbury Sat. 17 July Brondesbury vs. Ealing Overs games North Middlesex vs. Finchley Time games Finchley vs. North Middlesex 12.00 starts Twickenham vs. Teddington 11.00 starts Teddington vs. Twickenham Hampstead vs. Crouch End Crouch End vs. Hampstead Brondesbury vs. Teddington Teddington vs. Brondesbury Sat. 22 May Richmond vs. Hampstead Sat. 24 July Hampstead vs. Richmond Overs games Crouch End vs. North Middlesex Time games North Middlesex vs. Crouch End 12.00 starts Finchley vs. Ealing 11.00 starts Ealing vs. Finchley Twickenham vs. Shepherds Bush Shepherds Bush vs. Twickenham Brondesbury vs. Finchley Finchley vs. Brondesbury Sat. 29 May Teddington vs. Shepherds Bush Sat. 31 July Shepherds Bush vs. Teddington Overs games Ealing vs. Crouch End Time games Crouch End vs. Ealing 12.00 starts North Middlesex vs. Richmond 11.00 starts Richmond vs. North Middlesex Hampstead vs. Twickenham Twickenham vs. Hampstead Richmond vs. Ealing Ealing vs. Richmond Sat. 5 June Shepherds Bush vs. Hampstead Sat. 7 August Hampstead vs. Shepherds Bush Overs games Crouch End vs. Brondesbury Time games Brondesbury vs. Crouch End 12.00 starts Finchley vs. Teddington 11.00 starts Teddington vs. Finchley Twickenham vs.