Unitrans Records AR-071
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California
A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California A Research Report from the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Jean-Daniel Saphores, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Urban Planning and Public Policy, University of California, Irvine Deep Shah, Master’s Student, University of California, Irvine Farzana Khatun, Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, Irvine January 2020 Report No: UC-ITS-2019-55 | DOI: 10.7922/G2XP735Q Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-55 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California January 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Irvine 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jean-Daniel Saphores, Ph.D., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-0994; Deep Shah; N/A and Farzana Khatun 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Irvine N/A 4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Building 11. Contract or Grant No. Irvine, CA 92697 UC-ITS-2019-55 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Final Report (January 2019 - January www.ucits.org 2020) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI:10.7922/G2XP735Q 16. Abstract To gain a better understanding of the current use and performance of free and reduced-fare transit pass programs, researchers at UC Irvine surveyed California transit agencies with a focus on members of the California Transit Association (CTA) during November and December 2019. -
Routes Between Davis & Downtown Sacramento Routes
Updated 6/26/08 - Cancellation of “I-5 Shuttle” between Woodland, Airport, & Sacramento - Extension of Express Routes 43 & 45 until July 23 YOLOBUS Service During I-5 Construction A portion of I-5 in downtown Sacramento will be undergoing major Caltrans reconstruction, starting at 8 p.m., on Friday, May 30th and ending at 5 a.m. on Thursday, July 24th. The web site explaining the I-5 construction schedule is at http://fixi5.com/news.html . Routes Between Davis & Downtown Sacramento Express routes 44, 230, 231, and 232 will retain their existing schedule; however, we strongly suggest that route 44 and 230 riders take the earlier morning buses. Express routes do not run on weekends or July 4th. Route 43 Express between Davis and Sacramento (Effective 6/2/08-7/23/08) ADDITIONAL ROUTE 43 TRIPS WILL BE EXTENDED UNTIL WEDNESDAY, JULY 23rd. This route serves UCD, central, and northeast Davis. We will be adding two morning and two afternoon extra route 43 express trips during the I-5 project. Capitol Corridor “Fix I-5” Train Tickets For Travel between Davis and Sacramento Currently, the Discounted Capitol Corridor train tickets will expire on July 14th. However, we will keep you updated if Caltrans/Amtrak will allow us to extend the tickets until July 23rd. The tickets will be valid on weekdays only between Monday, June 2nd and Monday, July 14th (excluding July 4th). “Fix I-5” subsidized train tickets will be sold only to riders who indicate they are not current train or bus riders. The one-way train tickets are $2 a piece, with a limit of no more than 60 tickets sold per person. -
Aggie 20101014
serving the uc davis campus and community since 1915 volume 129, number 97 www.theaggie.org thursday, october 14, 2010 Police departments increase patrol Fall enforcement expanded to monitor partying By SARAHNI PECSON The Safe Party Initiative is a program on Aggie News Writer many college campuses to address high- risk drinking. In addition to the police de- With about 4,400 freshmen on campus for partments, Student Health Services (SHS), their first college quarter, Davis police offi- Campus Violence Prevention Program, cers are working extra hours to keep alco- Student Housing and Student Judicial Affairs hol-related incidents down. (SJA) are among the campus and com- The UC Davis Police Department and the munity groups involved in this initiative. city of Davis Police Department are plac- “The beginning of the academic year ing extra patrols on campus and downtown. brings a rise in excessive drinking, un- Categorized as “fall enforcement”, extra of- derage drinking, large parties, vandalism ficers are assigned to these locations for the and the number of people who visit bars,” first six weeks of the quarter. said Mandy Li, alcohol, tobacco and oth- Davis PD issued two extra foot patrols and er drug risk reduction coordinator at SHS. one officer in a vehicle in downtown drinking In the first four weeks of the quarter, there areas. There are also one to three bike offi- have been 64 noise complaints, six arrests, cers that patrol downtown during bar hours. three minors in possession citations, two “Freshmen students don’t have ex- SJA referrals and one DUI arrest. -
FEE REFERENDUM PROPOSED Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) BASIC NEEDS and SERVICES UNDERGRADUATE REFERENDUM ISSUE Do You A
FEE REFERENDUM PROPOSED Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) BASIC NEEDS AND SERVICES UNDERGRADUATE REFERENDUM ISSUE Do you approve a $26 increase (25 percent of which will be used for Return to Aid) to the ASUCD Base Fee portion of the ASUCD Fee, increasing the overall ASUCD Fee from $35 to $61 per undergraduate student per quarter effective fall 2020, followed by an additional $8.00 increase to the quarterly ASUCD Base Fee to be implemented annually in Academic Year (AY) 2021- 22 to AY 2029-30, with automatic CPI adjustments annually thereafter (See Table 1 below)? □ YES A yes vote provides funding for the following: ñ Maintain current ASUCD operations, services, and events that serve UC Davis students including but not limited to: o The ASUCD Pantry o Mental Health Initiative o Housing Advising for Undergraduate Students (HAUS) o The Coffee House o The Bike Barn o Picnic Day o Whole Earth Festival o Entertainment Council o Free Consultations with an Attorney Based on Availability ñ Expand Cultural Days funding ñ Expand Finance Council funding ñ Mitigate potential price increases at ASUCD’s commercial units (e.g. Coffee House, Bike Barn, etc.) ñ Allow ASUCD to support student employee wage increases in accordance to the State of California mandatory minimum wage increase law (Senate Bill 3; Leno, Chapter 4, Statutes of 2016) that took effect on January 1, 2017. ñ Transition 20 percent of ASUCD student employees from stipend to hourly pay. ñ Support The California Aggie once the Aggie Initiative expires in June 2021 □ NO A no vote -
Tcrp Report 94
TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 94 Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Fare Policies, Structures and Technologies: Update TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2003 (Membership as of March 2003) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of October 2002) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Genevieve Giuliano, Director and Prof., School of Policy, Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Michael S. Townes, Exec. Dir., Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads, Hampton, VA Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS DANNY ALVAREZ MEMBERS Miami-Dade Transit Agency KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN, Commissioner, New York State DOT GORDON AOYAGI SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary of Transportation, Kansas DOT JEAN PAUL BAILLY JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America Union Internationale des Transports Publics JAMES C. CODELL III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority LINDA J. BOHLINGER SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University HNTB Corp. LESTER A. HOEL, L. A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Depart. of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia ANDREW BONDS, JR. HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. JENNIFER L. DORN ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Prof. and Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of FTA California at Berkeley NATHANIEL P. -
Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S. -
2020 Hindsight: ASUCD Financial Report
Associated Students, University of California, Davis 2020 Hindsight: ASUCD Financial Report January 2020 Associated Students University of California, Davis Prepared By: Kevin Rotenkolber – ASUCD Controller Questions? : [email protected] Financial Report 2020 1 Associated Students, University of California, Davis Table of Contents 3 Introduction 4 Report Summary 5 ASUCD’s Base Fee 6 ASUCD vs other ASUC’s 8 What can be done? 10 First Amendment Context ASUCD Financial Report 2020 2 Associated Students, University of California, Davis Introduction When I first joined ASUCD, it was in a state of financial Back to the Beginning freefall. This was as a result of multiple years of poor The Associated Students, University Farm (ASUF) was management at the very top of the Association from founded in 1915 to represent the students at the University previous executive teams, forces beyond the control Farm, the UC Berkeley extension that became UC Davis in anyone within the Association that were difficult to foresee 1955. This same year ASUF was renamed and remains to without an extensive knowledge of sound fiscal and this day the Associated Students, University of California, business practices. And while I was able to stabilize the Davis operating with a largely unchanged governance budget for this year, the underlying problems will continue structure and primary mission: to serve the students of this to impact this association until drastic action is taken. This campus and improve their quality of life during their time report is intended to layout the major milestones in the here. This makes ASUCD the oldest governing body on the history of the Associated Students, University of California, campus, and expanding services to the student body, Davis that led to our current situation and how we move on providing basic needs, opportunities in advocacy, education, from here towards a more stable future. -
Urban Guidance: Detailed Coverage for Supported Transit Systems
Urban Guidance: Detailed coverage for supported transit systems Andorra .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Argentina ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Austria .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Brazil ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Chile ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Colombia .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Croatia ................................................................................................................................................. -
Copy of LCTOP 14-15 Cycle 2 Final Projects.Xlsx
LCTOP ITEM I J Fiscal Year 2014-15 Cycle 2 Project List Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Ref. Project title Project Description Project Lead Total benefit? Reduce Fare Project for Mendocino College This funding will be used to subsidize the bus fares for 1 Students Mendocino College students. No DAC Mendocino Transit Authority $ 31,142 No Expansion of express Expand express route transit services provided by Redding 2 services Area Bus Authority. No DAC Shasta Regional Transportation Agency $ 62,657 No To install 27 shelters throughout the regional transit Tehama County Transportation 3 Bus Shelter Install service area. Commission $ 20,762 Yes Provide means of information (signage, info boxes, Increase Awareness of displays) at bus stops, social services, senior agencies, 4 Transit System connection locations. No DAC Trinity County - Transit $ 4,618 No To upgrade an existing transit stop to include a bus shelter Auburn Transit- Municipal within the newly expanded airport route in order to Airport Route - Earhart & increase active transportation and encourage ridership. 5 Rickenbacker Bus Shelter No DAC City of Auburn $ 3,782 No City of Davis/Unitrans Weekend Service To increase service (extend transit routes, increase 6 Expansion frequency of service, extend service hours). No DAC City of Davis/Unitrans $ 30,977 No E-tran Local Route 156 Improve headways from 30 minutes to 15 minutes to Transit Service Frequency complement Sacramento RT's New Blue Line Light Rail 7 Improvements Service. City of Elk Grove $ 59,300 Yes Louis Orlando Transfer Reconstruction of the Louis Orlando Transfer Point will Point Improvements and allow for transit service expansion, enhancement and Fixed Route Service upgrades to encourage ridership, mode sharing and to 8 Enhancements support and encourage active transportation. -
Program Performance Review (PPR) Self-Study for the Period of AY 07/08-AY13/14 Department of Child and Adolescent Studies Colle
Program Performance Review (PPR) Self-Study for the Period of AY 07/08-AY13/14 Department of Child and Adolescent Studies College of Health and Human Development Submitted March 6, 2014 I. Department/Program Mission, Goals and Environment A. Briefly describe the mission and goals of the unit and identify any changes since the last program review. Review the goals in relation to the university mission, goals and strategies. The Department of Child and Adolescent Studies (CAS) is dedicated to promoting the well-being of children, adolescents, and families through teaching, research, and reflective practice. The Department’s mission is threefold: (1) to prepare students with the knowledge and skills necessary to be effective working with diverse populations in school, service, and community settings; (2) to conduct developmentally informed research with implications for practice; and (3) to make significant contributions to the community through fieldwork and service. As outlined below, the core goals of the Department are closely aligned with the goals of the University’s Strategic Plan. CAS Department Goals Aligned University Goals and Objectives Enhance student learning through Goal 1: Develop and maintain a curricular and co- ongoing program assessment and curricular environment that prepares students for implementation of program participation in a global society and is responsive to improvement strategies. workforce needs. Objective: Implement a sustainable University-wide assessment process that includes curricular and co- curricular components. Promote student success through Goal 1: Develop and maintain a curricular and co- effective advisement and support. curricular environment that prepares students for participation in a global society and is responsive to workforce needs. -
STAFF RE PO RT TO: AC Transit Board of Directors FROM: Michael A
Report No: 15-251b Meeting Date December 14, 2016 Alameda-ContraCosta Transit District STAFF RE PO RT TO: AC Transit Board of Directors FROM: Michael A. Hursh, General Manager SUBJECT: Procurement of Five(5) Additional Double Deck Buses ACTIONITEM RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) Consider authorizing the General Manager to exercise a contract option with Alexander Dennis for the purchaseof five(5) additionaldouble deck buses. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE In September 20].6, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC) programmed $40 million in funding for the Bay Bridge Forward package of improvements to help ease congestion on the Bay Bridge corridor. As part of this package the District received $5 million in federal CongestionMitigation and Air Quality(CMAQ)funds to purchasefive(5) additionaldouble deck buses. The buses willexpand service by providing additionalcapacity to overcrowded Transbay routes. Through the Bay Bridge Forward funding, the District was also awarded two years of operating funds for these buses. The Board authorized the General Manager to execute agreements with the MTC for implementation of the Bay Bridge Forward improvements during the September 28, 2016 Board meeting. The District issued a Request for Proposal(RFP) for the procurement of ten double deck buses, with options for up to nineteen additional buses. The District received one proposal from Alexander Dennis, Inc. Upon receipt of the proposal, the AC Transit technical evaluation team reviewed and scored the proposal based on a pre-defined evaluation matrix. Two external advisors also reviewed and scored the proposal based on the same evaluation matrix. The external advisors were from the UniTrans-University of California, Davis and WestCAT-Western Contra Costa Transit Authority as these agencies willhold options under the contract to acquire three and six double deck buses, respectively. -
Muslim & Arab Student Campus Climate at the University of California Fact-Finding Team Report & Recommendations
Muslim & Arab Student Campus Climate at the University of California Fact-Finding Team Report & Recommendations President’s Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture, & Inclusion Issued by Jihad Turk, Nan Senzaki, Tyrone Howard, and Armaan Rowther Charge & Scope The President’s Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture, and Inclusion was established by UC President Mark Yudof in June 2010 to identify, evaluate and share “promising practices.” It also monitors and evaluates the progress of each campus toward ensuring conditions and practices that support the University’s mission to provide equal opportunities for its community of students, faculty and staff consistent with campus Principles of Community. The Advisory Council is led by President Yudof and UC Berkeley School of Law Dean Christopher Edley and includes affiliated members from each campus and leaders from various constituent and community groups. In October 2011, the Council commissioned a team to be sent to several campuses to meet with members of the Muslim, Palestinian, and Arab communities. In April and May 2012, the Team visited six campuses – Santa Cruz, Davis, Irvine, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and San Diego. The team included: Imam Jihad Turk, Director of Religious Affairs as the Islamic Center of Southern California Professor Tyrone Howard, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, UC Los Angeles Nan Senzaki, LCSW, Staff, Counseling and Psychological Services, UC Davis Armaan Rowther, Undergraduate & XIV Dalai Lama Scholar, UC Irvine The Team was charged with the evaluation of the educational and co-curricular experiences of Muslim and Arab students which would culminate in recommendations for improving the education opportunities and campus climate for students.