Aggie 20101014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ryken Grattet August 2020
Ryken Grattet August 2020 Professor & Chair Department of Sociology University of California One Shields Avenue Davis, California 95616 e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1994. M.A. Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1989. B.S. Sociology, Western Washington University, 1986. EMPLOYMENT 2009-Present Professor of Sociology, University of California, Davis. 2017-Present Chair, Department of Sociology, University of California, Davis. 2020 Visiting Professor, King School of Law, University of California, Davis 2017-2020 Adjunct Fellow, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco and Sacramento. 2012-2017 Research Fellow, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco and Sacramento. 2009 (summer) Visiting Professor. Underwood International College, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. 2001-2009 Associate Professor of Sociology, University of California, Davis. 2005-2006 Assistant Secretary (A), Office of Research, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. 2000 Faculty Fellow, University of California Washington Center. 1996-2001 Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of California, Davis. 1996 Appointed Faculty, Women’s and Gender Studies Center, Louisiana State University. 1994-1996 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Louisiana State University. AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Law Organizations Criminology Deviance Methods Public Policy AWARDS • Distinguished Scholar Award. 2018. Division on Terrorism and Bias Crime. American Society of Criminology. Ryken Grattet--2 • Chair-elect, Chair, and Past-Chair. 2012-15. American Sociological Association, Sociology of Law Section. • Social Sciences Dean’s Innovation Award. 2012. College of Letters and Sciences, Division of Social Sciences. University of California, Davis. • Distinguished Scholarly Public Service Award. 2010. University of California, Davis. • Distinguished Article Award. 2007. American Sociological Association, Sociology of Law Section. -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Energy Facility Siting Council of the Stat
1 BEFORE THE ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL OF THE STATE OF OREGON 2 3 In the Matter of the Request for FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, 4 Amendment 4 of the Site Certificate for ET AL.’S REQUEST FOR A the SUMMIT RIDGE WIND FARM CONTESTED CASE PROCEEDING 5 6 7 I. INTRODUCTION 8 Pursuant to OAR 345-027-0071, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Oregon Wild, the 9 Oregon Natural Desert Association, Central Oregon LandWatch, and the East Cascades 10 11 Audubon Society (collectively, “Requesters”) request that the Energy Facility Siting Council 12 (“EFSC” or “Council”) conduct a contested case proceeding on the Request for Amendment 4 of 13 the Site Certificate for the Summit Ridge Wind Farm (“Project”), and allow Requesters to 14 participate as parties in the proceeding.1 15 16 It has been nearly ten years since the preliminary application for this Project was filed, 17 and nearly eight years since the Project was first approved. As a point of reference, in 2009, 18 when the Project was first applied for, Ted Kulongoski was Governor of Oregon, and Barack 19 Obama was in his first year as President of the United States. Since then, much has changed. The 20 Project has been abandoned by the initial developer, sold and transferred to a new owner 21 22 (“Pattern Energy,” “Pattern,” or “Applicant”),2 and the Project’s deadlines for beginning and 23 1 24 Requesters incorporate into this Request for Contested Case their February 21, 2019 comment letter to the Council (attached hereto as Exhibit A), the February 21, 2019 comment letter of Shawn 25 Smallwood, PhD to the Council (attached hereto as Exhibit B), and the oral comments of Friends’ Senior Staff Attorney Nathan Baker at the February 22, 2019 public hearing. -
Unitrans Records AR-071
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8gt5tm1 No online items Inventory of the Unitrans Records AR-071 Finding aid created by Archives and Special Collections staff University of California, Davis Library, University Archives 2018 1st Floor, Shields Library, University of California 100 North West Quad Davis, CA [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/archives-and-special-collections Inventory of the Unitrans Records AR-071 1 AR-071 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: University of California, Davis Library, University Archives Title: Unitrans Records Creator: Unitrans (University transport system) Identifier/Call Number: AR-071 Physical Description: 4.4 linear feet Date (inclusive): 1966-2008 Abstract: Annual reports, schedules, newspaper clippings, photographs, and memorabilia documenting the history of Unitrans, the University and City of Davis bus service. Researchers should contact Special Collections to request collections, as many are stored offsite. History In the late 1960's, the Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) explored possibilities for providing bus transportation to students traveling between the City of Davis and the campus. The University Transport System, or Unitrans, was founded by ASUCD and service officially began on February 28, 1968 with two London double decker buses operating on two routes. In 2008, Unitrans provided transportation with buses on 15 routes, carrying over 3 million passengers a year. Scope and Content of Collection Annual reports, schedules, newspaper clippings, photographs, and memorabilia documenting the history of Unitrans, the University and City of Davis bus service. Access Collection is open for research. Processing Information Liz Phillips encoded this finding aid with help from student assistant Aditi Sinha. -
FEE REFERENDUM PROPOSED Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) BASIC NEEDS and SERVICES UNDERGRADUATE REFERENDUM ISSUE Do You A
FEE REFERENDUM PROPOSED Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) BASIC NEEDS AND SERVICES UNDERGRADUATE REFERENDUM ISSUE Do you approve a $26 increase (25 percent of which will be used for Return to Aid) to the ASUCD Base Fee portion of the ASUCD Fee, increasing the overall ASUCD Fee from $35 to $61 per undergraduate student per quarter effective fall 2020, followed by an additional $8.00 increase to the quarterly ASUCD Base Fee to be implemented annually in Academic Year (AY) 2021- 22 to AY 2029-30, with automatic CPI adjustments annually thereafter (See Table 1 below)? □ YES A yes vote provides funding for the following: ñ Maintain current ASUCD operations, services, and events that serve UC Davis students including but not limited to: o The ASUCD Pantry o Mental Health Initiative o Housing Advising for Undergraduate Students (HAUS) o The Coffee House o The Bike Barn o Picnic Day o Whole Earth Festival o Entertainment Council o Free Consultations with an Attorney Based on Availability ñ Expand Cultural Days funding ñ Expand Finance Council funding ñ Mitigate potential price increases at ASUCD’s commercial units (e.g. Coffee House, Bike Barn, etc.) ñ Allow ASUCD to support student employee wage increases in accordance to the State of California mandatory minimum wage increase law (Senate Bill 3; Leno, Chapter 4, Statutes of 2016) that took effect on January 1, 2017. ñ Transition 20 percent of ASUCD student employees from stipend to hourly pay. ñ Support The California Aggie once the Aggie Initiative expires in June 2021 □ NO A no vote -
DOCKETED Docket Number: 09-AFC-07C Project Title: Palen Solar Power Project - Compliance TN #: 202499 Document Title: Exh
DOCKETED Docket Number: 09-AFC-07C Project Title: Palen Solar Power Project - Compliance TN #: 202499 Document Title: Exh. 3128 Testimony of Smallwood and CV Description: N/A Filer: Lisa Belenky Organization: Center for Biological Diversity Submitter Role: Intervenor Submission Date: 6/23/2014 3:35:56 PM Docketed Date: 6/23/2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission In the Matter of: APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 09-AFC-7C FOR THE PALEN SOLAR ENERGY GENERATING SYSTEM INTERVENOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Exhibit 3128 Testimony of K. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. Summary of Testimony The Palen Solar Electric Generating System (“Palen”) would destroy 4,024 acres of wildlife habitat and would put in its place thousands of heliostat mirrors and two power towers that will kill flying birds. I reviewed the Revised Staff Assessment (RSA), Final Staff Assessment (FSA), and related documents to assess project impacts, mostly as they are caused by collisions and thermal injuries to birds. I determined that, given the fatality rates reported for Solar One and given the numbers of fatalities being found at Ivanpah, the fatality rates that would be caused at Palen could far exceed the fatality rates in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, even though the 500 MW of installed capacity at Palen would be smaller than the 580 MW capacity of wind turbines in the Altamont Pass. The numbers of fatalities coming from Ivanpah reports suggest that avian fatality rates could exceed 20,000 per year. Curtailment and avian deterrent strategies have been proposed as mitigation measures as part of adaptive management at Palen, but these strategies have no record of success and probably would not yield measureable reductions in fatalities. -
2020 Hindsight: ASUCD Financial Report
Associated Students, University of California, Davis 2020 Hindsight: ASUCD Financial Report January 2020 Associated Students University of California, Davis Prepared By: Kevin Rotenkolber – ASUCD Controller Questions? : [email protected] Financial Report 2020 1 Associated Students, University of California, Davis Table of Contents 3 Introduction 4 Report Summary 5 ASUCD’s Base Fee 6 ASUCD vs other ASUC’s 8 What can be done? 10 First Amendment Context ASUCD Financial Report 2020 2 Associated Students, University of California, Davis Introduction When I first joined ASUCD, it was in a state of financial Back to the Beginning freefall. This was as a result of multiple years of poor The Associated Students, University Farm (ASUF) was management at the very top of the Association from founded in 1915 to represent the students at the University previous executive teams, forces beyond the control Farm, the UC Berkeley extension that became UC Davis in anyone within the Association that were difficult to foresee 1955. This same year ASUF was renamed and remains to without an extensive knowledge of sound fiscal and this day the Associated Students, University of California, business practices. And while I was able to stabilize the Davis operating with a largely unchanged governance budget for this year, the underlying problems will continue structure and primary mission: to serve the students of this to impact this association until drastic action is taken. This campus and improve their quality of life during their time report is intended to layout the major milestones in the here. This makes ASUCD the oldest governing body on the history of the Associated Students, University of California, campus, and expanding services to the student body, Davis that led to our current situation and how we move on providing basic needs, opportunities in advocacy, education, from here towards a more stable future. -
Responses to Comments on The
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JULY 2021 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This document contains all of the written comments received by the City of Santa Clara on the Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and presents the City’s responses to each of the substantive comments submitted by public agencies and members of the public. Written comments were received during the 30-day public review period, which extended from March 26, 2021 to April 26, 2021. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency must consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all comments received during the public review process. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.) Although written responses to comments on an MND are not required by CEQA, the City has determined to exceed the minimum requirements and prepare a response to the comments received that pertain to the adequacy of the IS/MND. According to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the State agencies that were invited to review the IS/MND included the following:1 • California Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Conservation (DOC) • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regions 2 and 3 • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) • California Department -
Jones-11-OCR-Page-0025.Pdf
Bakersfield Livermore Pacific Grove San Francisco (Cont) KGFM 101.5 I KKIQ 101.7 I KOCN 104.9 KSFX 103.7 F I KIFM 96.5 Lodi Palm Springs * KUSF 90.3 I KLYD-FM 94. 1 E I KWIN 97.7 I KOES-FM 104.7 I KYA-FM 93.3 I KUZZ-FM 107.9 Loma Linda Pasadena San Jose Berkeley * KEMR 88.3 '* KPCS 89.3 R I KBAY 100.3 * KALX 90.7 Lompoc I KROQ-FM 106.7 KEZR 106.5 '* KPFA 94. 1 R KLOM-FM 92.7 Paso Robles I KOME 98.5 * KPFB 89.3 Long Beach I KPRA 94.3 I KSJO 92.3 F I KRE-FM 102.9 E Patterson * KLON 88.l R * KSJS 90.7 Big Bear Lake I KNAC I KOSO 93.1 G 105.5 San Luis Obispo I KTOT-FM 101.7 I KNOB 97.9 Pismo Beach * KCBX 90.l Bishop * KSUL KPGA 95.3 90.1 * KCPR 91.3 E t KIOQ-FM 100.7 Porterville Los Altos I KUNA 96. l Blythe KIOO 99.7 * KFJC 89.7 I KZOZ 93.3 KYOR-FM 100.3 Quincy I KPEN 97.7 San Mateo Buena Park KFRW 95.9 Los Angeles * KCSM 91.1 R * KBPK 90.1 Redding I KBCA 105.1 I KSOL 107.7 Camarillo KVIP-FM 98.1 KBIG 104.3 San Rafael I KEWE 95.9 F - Redlands I KFAC FM 92.3 I KTIM-FM 100.9 M Cerlsbad KCAL-FM 96.7 I KFSG 96.3 Santa Ana I KARL-FM 95.9 * KUOR-FM 89.1 I KGBS-FM 97.1 D I KWIZ-FM 96.7 Carmel Redondo Beach KHOF 99.5 I KYMS 106.3 D I KLRB 101.7 I KKOP 93.5 I KIQQ 100.3 E Santa Barbara cathedral City Rio Vista I KJOI 98.7 '* KCSB-FM 91.5 I KWXY-FM 103.l * KRVH 90.9 I KKDJ 102.7 G I KDB-FM 93.7 Chico Riverside I KLOS 95.5 I KRUZ 103.3 E * KCHO 91.1 KBBL 99. -
PDC14-051 Dove Hill
PDC14-051/PD16-019 PUBLIC COMMENT A Le, Thai-Chau From: Aerieways <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 11:16 PM To: Le, Thai-Chau Subject: Re: Public Review Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration: Dove Hill Medical Care Facility Project (PDC14-051) Subject: Dove Hill Medical Care Project Thai-Chau, Per agreement lands once resided by the Tamien speakers will be represented by the Muwekma Tribal Band. Please consult with the Muwekma Tribal Band. Ed Ketchum Amah Mutsun Tribal Band' Historian -----Original Message----- From: Le, Thai-Chau <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Apr 9, 2018 11:05 am Subject: Public Review Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration: Dove Hill Medical Care Facility Project (PDC14-051) PUBLIC NOTICE INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA Project Name: Dove Hill Medical Care Project File No.: PDC14‐051 and PD16‐019 Description: The project proposed to rezone three acres (“development footprint”) of the 21‐acre site from Agriculture to A(PD) Planned Development for the demolition of all existing buildings, structures, trees and landscaping, and associated improvements, and to develop a convalescent hospital facility with two buildings containing a total of 155 patient rooms and up to 248 beds, all within the development footprint of the three acres. The remaining 18 acres would stay zoned Agriculture and would be maintained as undeveloped, permanent private open space. Location: A three‐acre portion of a larger 21‐acre site will be rezoned to a Planned Development (PD) zoning. The three acres include all of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 679‐08‐003 and 679‐09‐001, as well as portions of APNs 679‐08‐ 002 and 679‐09‐002. -
Program Performance Review (PPR) Self-Study for the Period of AY 07/08-AY13/14 Department of Child and Adolescent Studies Colle
Program Performance Review (PPR) Self-Study for the Period of AY 07/08-AY13/14 Department of Child and Adolescent Studies College of Health and Human Development Submitted March 6, 2014 I. Department/Program Mission, Goals and Environment A. Briefly describe the mission and goals of the unit and identify any changes since the last program review. Review the goals in relation to the university mission, goals and strategies. The Department of Child and Adolescent Studies (CAS) is dedicated to promoting the well-being of children, adolescents, and families through teaching, research, and reflective practice. The Department’s mission is threefold: (1) to prepare students with the knowledge and skills necessary to be effective working with diverse populations in school, service, and community settings; (2) to conduct developmentally informed research with implications for practice; and (3) to make significant contributions to the community through fieldwork and service. As outlined below, the core goals of the Department are closely aligned with the goals of the University’s Strategic Plan. CAS Department Goals Aligned University Goals and Objectives Enhance student learning through Goal 1: Develop and maintain a curricular and co- ongoing program assessment and curricular environment that prepares students for implementation of program participation in a global society and is responsive to improvement strategies. workforce needs. Objective: Implement a sustainable University-wide assessment process that includes curricular and co- curricular components. Promote student success through Goal 1: Develop and maintain a curricular and co- effective advisement and support. curricular environment that prepares students for participation in a global society and is responsive to workforce needs. -
Muslim & Arab Student Campus Climate at the University of California Fact-Finding Team Report & Recommendations
Muslim & Arab Student Campus Climate at the University of California Fact-Finding Team Report & Recommendations President’s Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture, & Inclusion Issued by Jihad Turk, Nan Senzaki, Tyrone Howard, and Armaan Rowther Charge & Scope The President’s Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture, and Inclusion was established by UC President Mark Yudof in June 2010 to identify, evaluate and share “promising practices.” It also monitors and evaluates the progress of each campus toward ensuring conditions and practices that support the University’s mission to provide equal opportunities for its community of students, faculty and staff consistent with campus Principles of Community. The Advisory Council is led by President Yudof and UC Berkeley School of Law Dean Christopher Edley and includes affiliated members from each campus and leaders from various constituent and community groups. In October 2011, the Council commissioned a team to be sent to several campuses to meet with members of the Muslim, Palestinian, and Arab communities. In April and May 2012, the Team visited six campuses – Santa Cruz, Davis, Irvine, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and San Diego. The team included: Imam Jihad Turk, Director of Religious Affairs as the Islamic Center of Southern California Professor Tyrone Howard, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, UC Los Angeles Nan Senzaki, LCSW, Staff, Counseling and Psychological Services, UC Davis Armaan Rowther, Undergraduate & XIV Dalai Lama Scholar, UC Irvine The Team was charged with the evaluation of the educational and co-curricular experiences of Muslim and Arab students which would culminate in recommendations for improving the education opportunities and campus climate for students. -
Ten-Year Capital Financial Plan 2008/2009 to 2017/2018
TEN-YEAR CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 2008/2009 - 2017/2018 UC DAVIS TEN-YEAR CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 2008/2009 TO 2017/2018 University of California, Davis Ten-Year Capital Financial Plan – 2008/2009 to 2017/2018 I. Executive Summary ........................................................................ 3 Program Summary ........................................................................................ 4 II. UC Davis Overview ........................................................................ 5 A Brief History of UC Davis ........................................................................... 5 UC Davis Today ........................................................................................... 5 III. Capital Planning Context ................................................................ 6 Long Range Development Plan ....................................................................... 6 Physical Design Framework ........................................................................... 6 Academic Planning ...................................................................................... 6 Administrative Needs Assessment ................................................................... 7 Budget Advisory Committee ........................................................................... 7 IV. Capital Program ............................................................................. 8 Recent History .............................................................................................. 8 Challenges