DOCSLIB.ORG

Regulation of Dioxin Releases from the Runcorn Operations of ICI and EVC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regulation of Dioxin Releases from the Runcorn Operations of ICI and EVC Information Report January 1997 Regulation of Dioxin releases from the Runcorn operations of ICI and EVC En viro n m en t Ag e n c y REGULATION OF DIOXIN RELEASES FROM THE RUNCORN OPERATIONS OF ICI AND EVC Executive Summary ICI and EVC at Runcorn operate processes for the production of the chemicals Vinyl Chloride, Perchloroethylene, Trichloroethylene, CTF and chlorine. All these processes form very small quantities of dioxins as unwanted by-products. At present, the site’s largest dioxin arising (some 500 grams Toxic Equivalent (TEQ)/year) is in heavy organic residues which are sent to the Holford brine cavities for secure containment. There are relatively minor releases to the air and water environments. Dioxins may also have been released to the local environment from historical operations. Major environmental improvements are being made on the site through the installation of three incinerators. Local air quality, the ozone layer and global warming will all benefit from a 90% reduction in the emission of chlorinated hydrocarbons to air. Discharges to water will be cut by 80% and this will enable the Weston Canal to comply with water quality standards. The incinerators will also provide for the discontinuation of waste disposal at Weston Marsh Lagoons and Holford brine cavities. These significant environmental improvements are balanced against a small release of dioxins to atmosphere (an estimated maximum of 0.244 grams TEQ/year). However, future dioxin releases are not considered to have any major environmental impact. The Environment Agency considers that there will be a net environmental benefit from the incinerators and supports their installation. The levels of dioxin in local air and soil are typical of an urban environment and do not give cause for concern. Sediments in the Weston Canal show elevated dioxin levels due to site releases, but these sediments are periodically dredged for disposal in Frodsham Marsh Lagoon where they are effectively isolated from the environment. Dioxins found in River Weaver sediments and local soils do not appear to have a significant contribution from process releases. The Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food have been made aware of dioxin releases from the Runcorn site and have concluded that there are unlikely to be any unacceptable effects on the human food chain. This has been supported by a recent survey of local farms which found dioxin levels in cow's milk to be well within acceptable limits. The Environment Agency is satisfied that there is sufficient regulatory control on dioxin releases to protect the local environment Cover photograph reproduced courtesy of ICI Chemicals & Polymers Limited Map extracts are reproduced from Odnance Survey Maps with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Environment Agency Licence CD031 77C0003 Environment Agency Information Centre ENVIRONMENT AGENCY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 2. WHAT ARE DIOXINS ?........................................................................................................................2 2.1 Chemistry of Dioxins................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Reporting Units........................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Sampling and Analysis..............................................................................................................3 2.4 The Relative Toxicity of Dioxins................................................................................................3 2.5 Properties of Dioxins.................................................................................................................4 2.6 Sources of Dioxins.................................................................................................................... 4 2.7 Health Effects............................................................................................................................5 3. WHY ARE DIOXINS PRODUCED ON THE RUNCORN SITE ?........................................................... 6 3.1 Vinyl Chloride (VC) Process...................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Perchloroethylene-Trichloroethylene (Per-Tri) Process..............................................................8 3.3 CTF Process............................................................................................................................ 10 3.4 Chlorine Process.....................................................................................................................10 3.5 Environmental Improvement Project (EIP).............................................................................10 3.6 Fluorochemicals Vents Treatment Unit (VTU).........................................................................12 3.7 Historical Sources................................................................................................................... 12 4. HOW MUCH DIOXIN IS RELEASED INTO THE ENVIRONMENT ?................................................. 1 3 4.1 Holford Brine Cavities.............................................................................................................1 3 4.2 Weston Marsh Lagoons..........................................................................................................14 4.3 Randle Island Landfill..............................................................................................................15 4.4 Dredging Lagoons..................................................................................................................15 4.5 Gaseous Emissions..................................................................................................................1 5 4.6 Use of Site Products................................................................................................................16 4.7 Site Releases in the UK Context..............................................................................................16 5. HOW ARE DIOXIN RELEASES REGULATED ?.................................................................................19 5.1 Integrated Pollution Control (IPC)......................................................................................... 19 5.2 Water Resources Act 1991 .(WRA 1991)................................................................................. 21 5.3 Environmental Protection Act 1990, Part II............................................................................21 5.4 Self Regulation........................................................................................................................22 6. ARE THE RELEASES HARMFUL ?......................................................................................................23 6.1 Air Quality...............................................................................................................................23 6.2 Water Quality......................................................................................................................... 23 6.3 Soil Quality............................................................................................................................. 25 6.4 Dioxin Origin..........................................................................................................................26 6.5 Food Chain Effects..................................................................................................................26 7. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................................... 29 8. FUTURE ACTIONS..............................................................................................................................31 Glossary of Terms....................................................................................................................................... 32 References...................................................................................................................................................33 APPENDICES.............................................................................................................................................34 Appendix A : Dioxin monitoring under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 - Part I (Integrated Pollution Control) Appendix B : Dioxin in soils around Runcorn 1. INTRODUCTION ICI Chemicals & Polymers Limited (ICI) and, provide a clear overview of dioxin releases to a lesser extent, European Vinyls from the Runcorn site. This document Corporation (UK) Limited (EVC) operate a represents the Information Report. The large manufacturing site in Runcorn, Report strikes a balance between technical Cheshire which produces chlorine, detail and readability by a wide audience. chlorinated Organics and a number of other Diagrams and tables have been used to aid chemicals. explanation, and scientific details have been simplified wherever possible. The Glossary In March 1994, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate near the end of this report gives simple of Pollution (HMIP) issued an Integrated descriptions of some of the key terms used Pollution Control (IPC) Authorisation to ICI in the text. for operation of the vinyl chloride process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cheshire. Rcncorn
    DIRECTORY.] CHESHIRE. RCNCORN. north-east from Chester and 18o! from London, on the The port charges are very favourable to the owner;; of south side of the river Mersey and at the western terminus vessels. of the Bridgewater and Trent and Mersey canals. The The depth of water in the Mersey at Runcorn is about bridge of the London and North Western railway, which 3 feet 6 inches less than that given in Holden's Tide Table here crosses the Mersey, ()pened 10 October, 1868, and for Liverpool, and vessels lie afloat whilst discharging and known as "Tueller's Girder," i!P a structure of wrought reloading. iron r,soo feet long, and 75 feet in height above high Runcorn Lay Bye.-This lay bye, within the Port of water mark, and is supported in mid-stream by two stone Manchester, abuts on the Manchester Ship Canal at piers, 8o feet in depth by 30 feet wide and 300 feet Runcorn immediately below Runcorn docks ; it is r,5oo apart, thus forming three openings of 300 feet each, ex· feet in lengt-h, with an averag-e depth of 26 feet of water elusive of the piers and abutments: the bridge has two alongside, and is equipped with coal tip, movable lines of railway and one footway for passengers, and cranes and other appliances for loading and discharging affords direct communication with Liverpool, Manchester, cargo. Sailing vessels ""hose lower masts, after strildng the manufacturi~g districts and London. The origin top masts, are too high to enable them to pass under of this place is unknown ; it has been called "Run­ the fixed ·bridges, are berthed at this lay bye, and their cofan" (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Document [Transplant and Rehabilitation]
    Briefing Document [Transplant and Rehabilitation] Laura Brett Unit 5b Hybrid Territories Transplant and Rehabilitation Atherosclerosis Discourse “ ... all the money goes up top, while the infrastructure wastes away from neglect. The famous skyline is a cheap trick now, a sleight-of-hand to draw your eye from the truth, as illusory as a bodybuilder with osteoporosis... ” [Andrew Vachss, Mask Market] [Introduction] Page 1 [Introduction] Page 2 The Cheshire Ring chesh-ire A collection of post-industrial places stitched together by a canal circuit that knows no boundaries. The circulatory canal system connects to microcirculatory waterways from in and around Cheshire and venturing further, terri- tories of North West England. At the edge of the ring remains a place [Runcorn], once the backbone of industrial trade, fundamental for its prosperity that so heavily depended on its waterways. Now, stands a fragile town lingering on distantly dissipating memories. The prognosis would advocate [Runcorn], a case of abandonment. [The Site] Page 3 Cheshire Ring Atherosclerosis Discourse The Site_Runcorn [The Site] Page 4 Project 1 Project 2 Dissection Stent An investigation of the compo- A device of plastic or sprung nent parts of a whole and their metal mesh inserted into a relations in making up the tubular structure, such as a whole. blood vessel, to provide support Project 1 provided an opportu- Project 2 advanced the knowl- nity to explore a place [site] edge and experience acquired more in depth than before, by dissecting and furthered this basing its ideals on the concept by intending a design to form of peeling back information and that would alter the site itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Riverside College Percival Lane Runcorn PROPOSAL: 18/00174/FUL - Proposed Residential Development Comprising 24 No
    APPLICATION NO: 18/00174/FUL and 18/00176/REM LOCATION: Former Riverside College Percival Lane Runcorn PROPOSAL: 18/00174/FUL - Proposed residential development comprising 24 no. dwellings with full details for access, landscaping, scale, layout and appearance 18/00176/REM - Reserved matters application relating to outline application 16/00131/OUT for details relating to appearance, scale, landscaping and layout. WARD: Mersey PARISH: None AGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): Countryside Properties DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: UDP Action Area 4: Runcorn & Weston National Planning Policy Framework Docklands (2012) Canal Safeguarding Area Halton Unitary Development Plan (2005) Key Area of Change: West Runcorn Halton Core Strategy Local Plan (2013) DEPARTURE No REPRESENTATIONS: 2 letters of objection/ representation from residents 1 letter of objection on behalf of the Runcorn Locks and Restoration Society 1 letter of Objection/ Representation with respect to each application received from Manchester Ship Canal Co. KEY ISSUES: Regeneration; canal safeguarding; ecology impacts; drainage; design quality; heritage/ listed building impacts; residential amenity and highway impacts, Access Rights RECOMMENDATION: 18/00174/FUL - Approve Subject to Conditions 18/00176/REM - Approve Subject to Conditions SITE MAP APPLICATION SITE The Site Both sites combine to provide approximately 10.2 acres adjoining the Bridgewater Canal approximately 1km from Runcorn town Centre. Site of the former Riverside College which is now vacant. Bridgewater House, a Grade 2 listed building, lies immediately to the north east. Land to the north east and south is predominantly residential in character. Land to the south west is in predominantly employment use with the nearest use being Runcorn Docks. The Manchester Ship Canal lies to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. B4027C/STS/01 July 2008
    Draft For Consultation Report No. B4027C/STS/01 July 2008 MERSEY GATEWAY DRAFT SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STRATEGY “GATEWAY TO SUSTAINABILITY” Halton Borough Council Environment and Development Directorate Rutland House Halton Lea Runcorn WA7 2GW The Mersey Gateway Project Mersey Gateway Sustainable Transport Strategy Page 1 Draft For Consultation INTRODUCTION C O N T E N T S 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 3 2 HALTON’S STORY OF PLACE ......................................................................................... 6 3 THE NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND LOCAL POLICY CONTEXT ................................... 36 4 MERSEY GATEWAY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STRATEGY (MG STS) ............... 48 5 MEASURING PROGRESS FOR THE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STRATEGY....................................................................................................................... 72 74 The Mersey Gateway Project Mersey Gateway Sustainable Transport Strategy Page 2 Draft For Consultation 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Halton’s Transport Policies, strategies and implementation programmes are contained within its second Local Transport Plan, (LTP2), which covers the period 2006/7- 2010/11. This Plan has been assessed by the DfT and graded as being ‘Excellent’. 1.1.2 Amongst the key issues identified within the LTP2 are the problems resulting from congestion on the Silver Jubilee Bridge (SJB), which, due to the high levels of demand, is unable to satisfy its dual role of providing for both strategic inter-urban movement and local trips between Runcorn and Widnes. 1.1.3 The impact of this congestion on the SJB is felt locally and sub-regionally through the constraints it places on economic development and regeneration, due to it’s adverse impacts on local and sub-regional highway networks when incidents occur, and in the inability to adequately provide sustainable transport to address accessibility and connectivity issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The 8D Association
    THE 8D ASSOCIATION ON SHED The Journal of the 8D Association Volume 3 Number 2 June 2013 Frodsham Junction Frodsham Junction looking west from the Halton Curve on 25 July 1975. The train was 1Z54 a Rhymney to Southport service hauled by locomotive number 46 028. Photo by David Lennon. £1.00 if Sold The Journal of the 8D Association Volume 3 Number 1 June 2013 Contents 2. Editorial 3. News 4. Folly Lane Branch and Weston Point Railway 12. Working Target 92 – Widnes to Folly Lane 15. Site visit to Clock Face No.1 and SH&RGR Locomotive Works 18. Royal Train over the St Helens and Runcorn Gap Railway 20. Events Editor A War Department Austerity Class locomotive heads south past Norman Road Runcorn with a mixed goods train in the late 1950s. Photo by Roy Gough The 2013 site visits programme has got off to a very good start. Our first visit on 6 April 2013 was to the Cheshire Lines Committee (CLC) North Liverpool Extension Line. The visit took place on Grand National day which was very appropriate for a route that carried specials to Aintree from the time of opening right up until 1963. 8D Members walked from Knotty Ash station to West Derby station. It was fascinating to hear the recollections of members who had last visited Knotty Ash on a Rugby League special over 50 years ago. At West Derby members were able to go inside the station building which is now a gas fire showroom. The second visit on 4 May 2013 was to the St Helens & Runcorn Gap Railway at Reginald Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item No. 4 Report To
    AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 REPORT TO: Development Control and Licensing Committee DATE: 26 th June 2002 REPORTING OFFICER: Executive Director, Environment and Development SUBJECT: Planning applications to be determined by the Committee WARDS: Boroughwide The following applications for planning permission are submitted to the Committee for consideration with a recommendation in each case. Those applications marked * are considered to have significant employment implications. Those applications now before the Committee in which the planning issues are clear will be included in a List (No. 1) to be circulated at the meeting. Unless a Member objects to a particular application on that list it is RECOMMENDED that each of the applications on List No. 1 be approved subject, where appropriate, to the conditions printed on the Agenda. Those applications now before the Committee in which the planning issues are clear but in respect of which objections have been received and/or which are recommended for refusal will be reported to the Committee and if no Member wishes to discuss an application further, it is RECOMMENDED that each of the applications on List No. 2 be either approved, subject, where appropriate, to the conditions printed on the Agenda, or refused for the reasons given on the Agenda. The remaining applications not included in Lists 1 and 2 and those about which further information is required by Members will be considered following consideration of those lists In addition, any planning application on which proper notification has been received from a member of the public to speak will normally be excluded from lists 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Manchester Ship Canal
    The national society for THE the study and protection of Victorian and Edwardian VICTORIAN architecture and allied arts SOCIETY LIVERPOOL GROUP NEWSLETTER December 2010 St Andrew, West Kirby, is an exceptional late work by John Douglas which (though begun in 1889) was only completed in its present form in 1909, two years before the architect’s death (see our 19 March talk). A memorial service was held here in October for former Newsletter editor, John Hawke- Genn (see p.9). PROGRAMME (The charge for each lecture event is held at £3.) Saturday 22 January 2011 - 2.15pm ULLET ROAD UNITARIAN CHURCH The ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING will be held beneath Gerald Moira's fine painted decoration on the vaulted ceiling of the Unitarian Church's library. An informal talk by Edmund Harris, the Society's recently appointed Churches Conservation Adviser, will follow. Edmund will reflect on his work for the Moscow Architecture Preservation Society as well as on current church cases. Saturday 19 February - 2.15pm QUAKER MEETING HOUSE, School Lane BUILDING THE BIG DITCH Glen Atkinson will present his unique Victorian 'magic lantern' slides of the construction of the Manchester Ship Canal, warts and all. Carol Hardie sets the scene in her account below. The ‘Industrial Archaeology’ theme will be continued later in the year with proposed talks on the Liverpool Overhead Railway and the Isle of Man’s Laxey Wheel. Saturday 5 March 2011 - 2.15pm QUAKER MEETING HOUSE, School Lane DOUBLE BILL "Frank Dickinson and Me" Andrew Richardson takes us on a tour of the remarkable Little Holland House, an Arts & Crafts gem in Carshalton Beeches near Croydon.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersey Ports Master Plan Executive Summary Executive Summary
    Mersey Ports Master Plan A 20 year Strategy for Growth Your Po rt... Your Views Executive Summary June 2011 Executive Summary Executive Summary Welcome to the Executive Summary of the Mersey Ports Master Plan – a 20 Year strategy for growth for the Port of Liverpool and The Manchester Ship Canal. It is important that you have your say upon the Consultation Draft by submitting your comments either electronically or in writing to our address or by completing and returning the enclosed questionnaire. A number of local events are also being held to inform interested parties of our growth aspirations. All views will be carefully considered and will help to shape the final version of the Master Plan. Gary Hodgson - Managing Director, Mersey Ports About Peel Ports Mersey Ports represents almost two-thirds of Peel Ports’ trade. The other ports in the Group are Clydeport in Scotland, the Lancashire Port of For more than a century, the Port of Liverpool and The Heysham and Medway Ports in the South East of Manchester Ship Canal were arch rivals competing England. with each other for cargo going to, and arriving from, every corner of the globe. The Port of Liverpool celebrated its 800th Anniversary in 2007, with The About Port Master Planning Manchester Ship Canal a relative newcomer which celebrated its 100th Anniversary in 1994. As part of the Government’s Interim Ports Policy In September 2005 these two great undertakings were Report of July 2007, it was recommended that all brought together “as one” under the banner of Peel major ports produce Port Master Plans, and consult Ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Society Archives the Society Has Devised a Very Detailed Classification System for Recording Information About Runcorn and District
    Society Archives The Society has devised a very detailed classification system for recording information about Runcorn and district. The information relating to the archive material in the care of the Society has been broadly classified within the detailed system. The Society maintains a very comprehensive bibliography, by subject, and will willingly supply this information for those wishing to research a particular topic of Runcorn history. The postcards and photographs in the collection have been moved from their original listing place and appear as separate lists at the end of the Archive listing. The resultant gaps in the numbering sequence will be filled by later acquisitions. Updated to 08.08.2007. 1. General information or descriptions – 1.00.01 “William Handley – An Anthology of his writings around 1900” – pub. by Society Box 1 1.00.02A/B “Runcorn History Trail” - Halton Borough Council (2 copies) Box 1 1.00.03 “A History of Cheshire”. Dorothy Sylvester Box 1 1.00.04 Nickson’s “Town History of Runcorn” – Runcorn Guardian Box 1 1.00.05A “Cheshire History” – vol. 41Box 1 1.00.05B “Cheshire History” – vol. 42Box 1 1.00.05C “Cheshire History” – vol. 43Box 1 1.00.05D “Cheshire History” – vol. 44Box 1 1.00.05E “Cheshire History” – index to vols. 1-43Box 1 1.00.05F “Cheshire History” – vol. 45Box 1 1.00.05G “Cheshire History” – vol. 46Box 1 15.00.08“Printed maps in Cheshire Record Office” 2nd ed. – Cheshire Record Office Box 1 1.00.07 “The Halton Legacy” – Halton Borough Council Box 1 1.00.08 “Cheshire Past” issue 3 Box 1 1.00.09 “Thirty Eight Years Work at Runcorn” – James Wilding Runcorn UDC Surveyor Box 1 1.00.10 Merseyside Plan 1944 – Supplementary Illustrations Box 1 1.00.11 Bibliography and Chronology of Runcorn to 1974 Box 1 1.00.12 “Along the Waterfront” – a riverside history of Runcorn Box 1 1.00.13 “A New Historical Atlas of Cheshire” Box 1 1.00.14 “History of Cheshire” Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Pdf 85 Kb
    SAFER POLICY AND PERFORMANCE BOARD At a meeting of the Safer Policy and Performance Board on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 at the Council Chamber - Town Hall, Runcorn Present: Councillors Thompson (Chair), Baker, E. Cargill, V. Hill, P. Lloyd Jones, K. Loftus, Logan, G. Stockton and Zygadllo Apologies for Absence: Councillor N. Plumpton Walsh Absence declared on Council business: None Officers present: M. Andrews, C. Patino and G. Ferguson Also in attendance: Councillors D. Cargill and Morley and J. Mckibbin (Home Office), S. Seddon and A. Smith (Manchester Port Health Authority) ITEM DEALT WITH UNDER DUTIES EXERCISABLE BY THE BOARD Action SAF9 CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS The Chair announced that a working party meeting was needed to finalise the Council’s White Ribbon submission. It was agreed that this would be held on 10th October 2018. Members received an update on a recent fatal stabbing in Runcorn. It was noted that two persons had been charged with murder and remanded into custody. Councillor D. Cargill, David Parr and other Council Officers would be attending a joint agency meeting tomorrow. SAF10 MINUTES The Minutes of the meeting held on 12th June 2018 were taken as read and signed as a correct record. SAF11 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME It was reported that no questions had been received. SAF12 SSP MINUTES The minutes from the previous Safer Halton Partnership (SHP) meeting held on 2nd May 2018 were presented to the Board for information. SAF13 NORTH WEST AMBULANCE SERVICE ANNUAL REPORT The report was deferred until a future meeting date. SAF14 HOME OFFICE BORDER AGENCY The Board received a presentation from Mr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan
    local environment agency plan WEAVER/DANE CONSULTATION REPORT OCTOBER 1997 nutsford Biddul, E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR En v ir o n m e n t Ag ency Weaver/Dane Key Details • Total Area 1423 km2 • Population c.500,000 • Administrative Details District Councils Vale Royal Chester Newcastle-under-Lyme Congleton High Peak Warrington North Shropshire Crewe & Nantwich Staffordshire Moorlands Halton Macclesfield • Water Resources Largest Abstraction (at Brunner Mond, Northwich) 165,478 m3/day Average Annual Rainfall 716 mm Number of River Level only Measuring Stations 3 Number of River Level & Flow Measuring Stations 7 Number of Raingauges 25 • Flood Protection Length of Designated "Main River" Watercourses 619.4 km (Maintained by the Environment Agency) • Water Quality Length of classified river and canal 623.8 km • Fisheries Length of trout fishery 93 km Length of coarse fishery 187 km • Conservation Number of Sites of Special Scientific Importance (SSSI) 81 Number of Sites of Biological Importance (SBI) 412 • Heritage Sites Number of Scheduled Ancient Monuments (SAMs) 30 Number of Conservation Areas 12 NB These figures are for designated sites located near to "main river" & therefore, do not include all sites within the area boundary. • Integrated Pollution Control/Radioactive Substances I PC sites 21 Authorised Processes 49 RAS Authorisations 7 Registrations 33 • Waste Regulation Number of licensed sites 63 Number of registered exempt sites 114 Number of registered carriers of waste 375 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Weaver/Dane LEAP The Environment Agency Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay, i ^ ENVIRONMENT Peterborough PE2 5ZR.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANCIENT PARISH CHURCH of RUNCORN Bert Starkey
    THE ANCIENT PARISH CHURCH OF RUNCORN Bert Starkey This Article is based on a talk given to the Runcorn & District Historical Society on Friday April 7th 2006. Bert Starkey was a Vice-President of the Society. He died in May 2011, aged 84. Runcorn is an ancient town. Its foundation dates back to 914 when Princess Ethelfleda built a fort at the narrows of the River Mersey in order to prevent Norse long ships from passing up the river. A settlement was established to support the garrison and the hamlet would require a church which was almost certainly built of wood. This would be replaced by stone during the Norman period. Over the following centuries the parish of Runcorn came into being. Its boundaries stretched to include Thelwall, Daresbury, Aston and Halton, making it a remarkably large parish. In these places chapels of ease were built to accommodate those parishioners who lived at a distance from the mother church in Runcorn. Each chapelry had a curate or priest in charge. A curate today is a young man starting out in his ministry, but a curate in times past could be up to 70 years of age. The congregations of the chapels were required to contribute to the upkeep of the Runcorn church. They had to pay towards its repair. They had to contribute towards the cost of the fencing, the gates, the stiles, and the bell ropes at Runcorn. The chapelries even had to pay a share of the costs of the candles, the communion bread and the wine used at the Runcorn church, and there were constant disputes between the Runcorn church wardens and the chapel wardens over money all the time right through the centuries.
    [Show full text]