Download from FORRU-CMU's Archive English

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download from FORRU-CMU's Archive English Direct Seeding for Restoring Tropical Lowland Forest Ecosystems in Southern Thailand Panitnard Tunjai A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Program in Ecology and Biodiversity Walailak University 2011 Thesis Title Direct Seeding for Restoring Tropical Lowland Forest Ecosystems in Southern Thailand Author Panitnard Tunjai Major Program Ecology and Biodiversity Advisory Committee Examining Committee ....…………………………...Chairman .………….….………………Chairman (Asst. Prof. Dr. Pitiwong Tantichodok) (Asst. Prof. Dr. Chatchai Ngamraibsakul) ....…………………………Committee ....…………………………Committee (Dr. Stephen Elliot) (Asst. Prof. Dr. Pitiwong Tantichodok) ....…………………………Committee ....…………………………Committee (Asst. Prof. Dr. Shawn K. Y. Lum) (Dr. Stephen Elliot) ..…..….……………………Committee (Asst. Prof. Dr. Shawn K. Y. Lum) ...…..….……………………Committee (Asst. Prof. Dr. Sara Bumrungsri) The Graduate Committee, Doctor of Philosophy Program in Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Science, Walailak University, has approved this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Program in Ecology and Biodiversity ....………………………………………. (Asst. Prof. Dr. Pitiwong Tantichodok) Chairman of the Graduate Committee, Doctor of Philosophy Program in Ecology and Biodiversity Table of Contents Page Abstract (Thai)…………………………………………………………………….. i Abstract (English)…………………………………………………………………. iii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………... v Table of Contents………………………………………………………………….. vii List of Tables………………………………………………………………………. ix List of Figures……………………………………………………………………... xii List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………..... xvi Chapter 1. Introduction………………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 Tropical deforestation………………………………………..... 1 1.2 Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forest……………... 2 1.3 Restoration techniques……………………………………….... 4 1.4 Direct seeding as a tool for forest restoration…………………. 6 1.5 Case studies of success and failure with direct seeding……….. 11 1.6 Reforestation in southern Thailand……………………………. 14 1.7 Research objectives of this study…………………………….... 17 2. Site description………………………………………………………... 20 2.1 Southern Thailand……………………………………………... 20 2.2 Study sites……………………………………………………... 22 3. Phenology of lowland tropical tree species in southern Thailand…..... 28 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………. 28 3.2 Materials and methods……………………………………….... 30 3.3 Results…………………………………………………………. 36 3.4 Discussion……………………………………………………... 64 4. Seed characteristics and the early establishment of direct seeding….... 70 4.1 Introduction……………………………………………………. 70 4.2 Materials and methods……………………………………….... 72 4.3 Results…………………………………………………………. 77 viii Table of Contents (Continued) Page 4.4 Discussion……………………………………………………... 92 5. Factors affecting the establishment of direct-seeded seedlings……..... 96 5.1 Introduction……………………………………………………. 96 5.2 Materials and methods……………………………………….... 100 5.3 Results…………………………………………………………. 105 5.4 Discussion……………………………………………………... 125 6. Comparing field performance direct seeded and nursery-grown trees.. 132 6.1 Introduction……………………………………………………. 132 6.2 Materials and methods……………………………………….... 135 6.3 Results………………………………………………………..... 138 6.4 Discussion……………………………………………………... 155 7. Species relevance and the achievement of direct seeding…………...... 158 7.1 Introduction…………………………………………………..... 158 7.2 Materials and methods……………………………………….... 160 7.3 Results………………………………………………………..... 164 7.4 Discussion……………………………………………………... 174 8. Overall discussion…………………………………………………...... 179 8.1 Factors affecting direct seeding success……………………..... 179 8.2 Implications for efficient direct seeding technique in southern Thailand……………………………………………………….. 180 8.3 Patch dynamic after interventions on abandoned areas ……..... 185 8.4 Limitations of this study and gaps in knowledge…………….... 186 References………………………………………………………………………..... 188 Curriculum Vitae….……………………………………………………………...... 215 ix List of Tables Table Page 2.1 Soil properties in both study sites …………………………………………… 27 3.1 List of 55 species observed……………………………………………........... 32 3.2 Flowering phenology in Krabi………………………………………….......... 41 3.3 Flowering phenology in Nakhon Si Thammarat…………………………...... 43 3.4 Fruiting phenology in Krabi………………………………………………..... 45 3.5 Fruiting phenology in Nakhon Si Thammarat……………………………...... 47 4.1 List of study species, collection and storage methods in both sites………...... 75 4.2 Seed traits of species used in the study……………………………………..... 79 4.3 Means of germination and survival percentage affected by seed traits…….... 83 4.4 Mean MLD (days) influenced by seed traits………………………................ 86 4.5 Summary of seed traits and their potential to be the candidates for direct seeding……………………………………………………….......................... 88 4.6 Seed traits score of studied species………...………………………................ 89 4.7 Suitability score of studied species at one year after sowing...……................ 90 5.1 List of study species, sowing time and storage methods at both sites……...... 102 5.2 Mean percentage germination of all studied species in both field and nursery condition at Krabi…………………………………………………… 105 5.3 Mean germination percentage of all studied species in both field and nursery condition at Nakhon Si Thammarat………………………………..... 106 5.4 Overview germination and MLD of all germinated species in both field and nursery………………………………………………………………….... 107 5.5 Mean germination, MLD and establishment performance affected by different sowing time for two species that bore fruits available for both sowings………………………………………………………………………. 110 5.6 Mean germination, MLD and establishment affected by different sowing time for groups of random species that bore fruits available for each sowing………………………………………………………………………... 113 x List of Tables (Continued) Table Page 5.7 In early sowing, mean germination, MLD, establishment and growth performance affected by different management regimes for groups of random species that bore fruits available…………………………………….. 118 5.8 In late sowing, mean germination, MLD, establishment and growth performance affected by different management regimes for groups of random species that bore fruits available …………………………………... 119 5.9 Mean germination percentage and MLD of three species for seeds stored before late sowing…………………………………………………………….. 120 5.10 Mean germination percentage, MLD, establishment and growth performance in different management regimes of D. oblonga for both sowing times……………………………………………………………….... 122 5.11 Mean germination percentage, MLD, establishment and growth performance in different management regimes of D. pilosanthera of both sowing times……………………………………………………………….... 123 5.12 Mean germination percentage, MLD, establishment and growth performance in different management regimes of P. pterocarpum for both sowing times……………………………………………………………….... 124 6.1 Mean percentage of survival at the end of 1st rainy season after transplanting……………………………………………………………….... 139 6.2 Mean of growth performance between direct-seeded and nursery-grown plants at 1 year after sowing (T1) and the end of 2nd rainy season after sowing (T2)………………………………………………………………...... 141 6.3 Mean relative growth rate (MRGR) of direct-seeded and nursery-grown plants at the end of 2nd rainy season after sowing………………………...... 144 6.4 Mean of growth data, relative growth rate (MRGR) and root/shoot ratio between different nutrient supply regimes at the end of 1st rainy season after transplanting…………………………………………………………… 146 6.5 Mean dry weight and root/shoot ratio between direct-seeded and nursery- raised plants at the end of 1st rainy season after transplanting………………. 147 xi List of Tables (Continued) Table Page 6.6 Establishment and maintenance costs of direct seeding and planting through 2 years of study………………………………………………………………. 149 7.1 List of study species………………………………………………………….. 161 7.2 Mean percentage germination and establishment of early-sown species across sucessional stage, dispersal mode and fruit type…………………....... 166 7.3 Mean percentage germination and establishment of late-sown species across sucessional stage, dispersal mode and fruit type…………………………...... 167 7.4 Growth performances of early-sown species across sucessional stages, dispersal modes and fruit types………………………………………………. 169 7.5 Growth performances of late-sown species across sucessional stages, dispersal modes and fruit types…………………………………………….... 170 7.6 Mean relative growth rate (MRGR) of early-sown species………………..... 171 7.7 Mean relative growth rate (MRGR) of late-sown species…………………... 172 7.8 Suitability score of studied species in both sowing times…………............... 173 xii List of Figures Table Page 2.1 Total monthly rainfall, and mean maximum and minimum temperature at Krabi; (a) 1989-2008 and (b) 2009-2010………………………………......... 24 2.2 Total monthly rainfall, and mean maximum and minimum temperature at Nakhon Si Thammarat; (a) 1989-2008 and (b) 2009-2010………………..... 25 3.1 The proportion of subannual, annual, supraannual, and continual flowering types of observed tree species……………………………….......................... 36 3.2 Observed patterns of community flowering; (a) no. of species with flowers, and sum average of species score at (b) KB = Krabi and (c) NST = Nakhon Si Thammarat………………………………………….... 38 3.3 Observed patterns of community fruit ripening; (a) no. of species with ripe fruits, and sum average of species score at (b) KB = Krabi and (c) NST = Nakhon Si Thammarat………………………………………….... 39 3.4 List of species with
Recommended publications
  • Flora and Fauna of Phong Nha-Ke Bang and Hin Namno, a Compilation Page 2 of 151
    Flora and fauna of Phong Nha-Ke Bang and Hin Namno A compilation ii Marianne Meijboom and Ho Thi Ngoc Lanh November 2002 WWF LINC Project: Linking Hin Namno and Phong Nha-Ke Bang through parallel conservation Flora and fauna of Phong Nha-Ke Bang and Hin Namno, a compilation Page 2 of 151 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the WWF ‘Linking Hin Namno and Phong Nha through parallel conservation’ (LINC) project with financial support from WWF UK and the Department for International Development UK (DfID). The report is a compilation of the available data on the flora and fauna of Phong Nha-Ke Bang and Hin Namno areas, both inside and outside the protected area boundaries. We would like to thank the Management Board of Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, especially Mr. Nguyen Tan Hiep, Mr. Luu Minh Thanh, Mr. Cao Xuan Chinh and Mr. Dinh Huy Tri, for sharing information about research carried out in the Phong Nha-Ke Bang area. This compilation also includes data from surveys carried out on the Lao side of the border, in the Hin Namno area. We would also like to thank Barney Long and Pham Nhat for their inputs on the mammal list, Ben Hayes for his comments on bats, Roland Eve for his comments on the bird list, and Brian Stuart and Doug Hendrie for their thorough review of the reptile list. We would like to thank Thomas Ziegler for sharing the latest scientific insights on Vietnamese reptiles. And we are grateful to Andrei Kouznetsov for reviewing the recorded plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Tree Communities in Mount Patuha Region, West Java
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X (printed edition) Volume 11, Number 2, April 2010 ISSN: 2085-4722 (electronic) Pages: 75-81 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d110205 Diversity of tree communities in Mount Patuha region, West Java DECKY INDRAWAN JUNAEDI♥, ZAENAL MUTAQIEN♥♥ Bureau for Plant Conservation, Cibodas Botanic Gardens, Indonesian Institutes of Sciences (LIPI), Sindanglaya, Cianjur 43253, West Java, Indonesia, Tel./Fax.: +62-263-51223, email: [email protected]; [email protected] Manuscript received: 21 March 2009. Revision accepted: 30 June 2009. ABSTRACT Junaedi DI, Mutaqien Z (2010) Diversity of tree communities in Mount Patuha region, West Java. Biodiversitas 11: 75-81. Tree vegetation analysis was conducted in three locations of Mount Patuha region, i.e. Cimanggu Recreational Park, Mount Masigit Protected Forest, and Patengan Natural Reserve. Similarity of tree communities in those three areas was analyzed. Quadrant method was used to collect vegetation data. Morisita Similarity index was applied to measure the similarity of tree communities within three areas. The three areas were dominated by Castanopsis javanica A. DC., Lithocarpus pallidus (Blume) Rehder and Schima wallichii Choisy. The similarity tree communities were concluded from relatively high value of Similarity Index between three areas. Cimanggu RP, Mount Masigit and Patengan NR had high diversity of tree species. The existence of the forest in those three areas was needed to be sustained. The tree communities data was useful for further considerations of conservation area management around Mount Patuha. Key words: Mount Patuha, tree communities, plant ecology, remnant forest. INTRODUCTION stated that the conservation status of tropical mountain rainforests of West Java has reached threatened conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae) from Kaeng Krung National Park, Southern Thailand with the Distribution Map of the Genus in Thailand
    Zootaxa 4965 (2): 396–400 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4965.2.12 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:828F1BE6-282F-4CAA-A063-6C9294B90EC5 A new species, Agapetus kaengkrungensis (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae) from Kaeng Krung National Park, southern Thailand with the distribution map of the genus in Thailand SOLOMON BOGA VADON1,3, PATTIRA PONGTIPATI2,4 & PONGSAK LAUDEE2,5,* 1Faculty of Science and Industrial Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Muang District, Surat Thani Prov- ince, Thailand 84100. 2Faculty of Innovative Agriculture and Fishery Establishment Project, Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Muang District, Surat Thani Province, Thailand 84100. 3 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-4831-8854 4 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1370-9313 * Correspondence: 5 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-7980 Abstract The male of a new species of caddisfly, Agapetus kaengkrungensis n. sp. (Glossosomatidae) is described and illustrated from Kaeng Krung National Park, Surat Thani Province, southern Thailand. Agapetus kaengkrungensis n. sp. is distinguished from other species by the characters of segment IX and inferior appendages. The distributions of the Agapetus spp. of Thailand are mapped and discussed. Key words: diversity, Oriental Region, caddisfly Introduction Three genera of Glossosomatidae are known from Thailand including Glossosoma Curtis 1834, Agapetus Curtis 1834, and Padunia Martynov 1910. A fourth genus Cariboptila Flint 1964 has also been reported in Thailand, but its occurrence outside of the Caribbean region is disputed (Robertson & Holzenthal 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • 46443-003: Second Greater Mekong Subregion Corridor Towns Development Project
    Initial Environmental Examination May 2019 Lao PDR: Second Greater Mekong Sub-Region Corridor Towns Development Project Prepared by the Ministry of Public Works and Transport for the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in August 2015 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/46443-003/main#project-documents. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Ministry of Public Works and Transport Department of Housing and Urban Department of Public Works and Transport, Bokeo Province Second Greater Mekong Sub-Region Corridor Towns Development Project ADB Loan Nos. 3315/8296-LAO INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION LUANG NAMTHA MARCH 2019 0 ADB Loan no. 3315/8296 – LAO: Second Greater Mekong Subregion Corridor Towns Development Project (CTDP) / IEE Report CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of Feb 2019) Currency Unit – Kip K K1.00 = $ 0.00012 USD $1.00 = K8,000 ABBREVIATIONS DAF Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • From Singapore, with a Description of a New Cladiella Species
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2010 THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2010 58(1): 1–13 Date of Publication: 28 Feb.2010 © National University of Singapore ON SOME OCTOCORALLIA (CNIDARIA: ANTHOZOA: ALCYONACEA) FROM SINGAPORE, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF A NEW CLADIELLA SPECIES Y. Benayahu Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Email: [email protected] (Corresponding author) L. M. Chou Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – Octocorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) from Singapore were collected and identifi ed in a survey conducted in 1999. Colonies collected previously, between 1993 and 1997, were also studied. The entire collection of ~170 specimens yielded 25 species of the families Helioporidae, Alcyoniidae, Paraclcyoniidae, Xeniidae and Briareidae. Their distribution is limited to six m depth, due to high sediment levels and limited light penetration. The collection also yielded Cladiella hartogi, a new species (family Alcyonacea), which is described. All the other species are new zoogeographical records for Singapore. A comparison of species composition of octocorals collected in Singapore between 1993 and 1977 and those collected in 1999 revealed that out of the total number of species, 12 were found in both periods, whereas seven species, which had been collected during the earlier years, were no longer recorded in 1999. Notably, however, six species that are rare on Singapore reefs were recorded only in the 1999 survey and not in the earlier ones. It is not yet clear whether these differences in species composition indeed imply changes over time in the octocoral fauna, or may refl ect a sampling bias.
    [Show full text]
  • Phuket Province
    1 Phuket Province Provincial Emblem Flag Province . Governor: Narong Phonla-iat (since Government October 2016) Capital: Phuket City Royal capital: - Population: 386,605 (2014) Area: 576 km2 Administrative divisions Phuket is divided into three districts (amphoe), which are further subdivided into 17 sub-districts (tambon), and 103 villages (muban).Mueang Surat Thani 1. Mueang Phuket 2. Kathu 3. Thalang There are nine municipal (thesaban) areas within the province. The capital Phuket has city (thesaban nakhon) status. Patong and Kathu have town (thesaban mueang) status. There are further six sub-district municipalities (thesaban tambon): Karon, Thep Krasattri, Choeng 2 Thale, Ratsada, Rawai, and Wichit. The non-municipal areas are administered by nine tambon administrative organizations (TAO). Geography Phuket is the largest island in Thailand. It is in the Andaman Sea in southern Thailand. The island is mostly mountainous with a mountain range in the west of the island from the north to the south. The mountains of Phuket form the southern end of the Phuket mountain range, which ranges for 440 kilometres (270 mi) from the Kra Isthmus. Although some recent geographical works refer to the sections of the Tenasserim Hills in the isthmus as the "Phuket Range", these names are not found in classical geographic sources. In addition, the name Phuket is relatively recent having previously been named Jung Ceylon and Thalang. The highest elevation of the island is usually regarded as Khao Mai Thao Sip Song (Twelve Canes), at 529 metres (1,736 ft) above sea level. However it has been reported by barometric pressure readings that there is an even higher elevation (with no apparent name), of 542 meters above sea level, in the Kamala hills behind Kathu waterfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Knowledge of Wild Edible Plants with Special Emphasis On
    Shin et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:48 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0248-1 RESEARCH Open Access Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants with special emphasis on medicinal uses in Southern Shan State, Myanmar Thant Shin1,2, Kazumi Fujikawa3, Aung Zaw Moe4 and Hiroshi Uchiyama1* Abstract Background: Myanmar is one of the hotspots of biodiversity and is a rapidly developing country. Performing floristic research in Myanmar is an urgent issue, and ethnobotanical studies of wild edible plants (WEPs) will provide new information on natural plant resources. Method: Ethnobotanical data were collected in three villages with different historical backgrounds in Southern Shan State, Myanmar. A total of 19 key informants were interviewed, and specimens were collected in the fields with the participation of key informants in June–July 2015. Group discussions were organized during 2016 and 2017 to reinforce the information on use of WEPs. DNA barcoding was used to facilitate species identification. Results: A total of 83 species from 44 families of angiosperms were recorded as WEPs. Most of the species were used as wild vegetables (47 species), followed by fruits and nuts (31 species). Eighteen WEPs were consumed as medicinal foods. Differences in use of WEPs between the communities of the villages were observed. The age class of 30–39 years was more familiar with the environments where they could collect WEPs and had more knowledge of WEPs than did the older groups. The use of Elaeocarpus floribundus as an edible oil is a very interesting tradition. Conclusion: WEPs play an important role in the livelihood of local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Studies of Rudraksha; Elaeocarpus Spp. Sagar Banerjee, Priyank Bharati, Sonali Gangwar and D
    International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 10(1): 15-20(2018) ISSN No. (Print): 0975-1718 ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3247 Phylogenetic Studies of Rudraksha; Elaeocarpus spp. Sagar Banerjee, Priyank Bharati, Sonali Gangwar and D. V. Rai Centre for Biological Engineering, Shobhit University, Gangoh (Uttar Pradesh), India (Corresponding author: Sagar Banerjee) (Received 12 December, 2017, accepted 10 January, 2018) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: Elaeocarpus is a diverse genus within the family Elaeocarpaceae. There is wide distribution of Elaeocarpus in the world among the tropical and subtropical climatic zones. In India, rudraksha ( Elaeocarpus sphaericus ) has important medicinal and religious values and its history dates back to ancient times. However, the evolutionary relationship of rudraksha with other species of Elaeocarpus is not much explored specially at the molecular and phylogenetic level. The present study establishes evolutionary relationship between rudraksha and other species of Elaeocarpus through phylogenetic algorithms like neighbor joining and maximum likelihood. Thirty species of Elaeocarpus found in the Indo-Australian region were grouped into clusters based on the rDNA and ITS sequence based phylogenetic analysis. This studies paves a way for further studies on evolutionary history of rudraksha with respect to other species of Elaeocarpus and their geographical distribution. Keywords: Rudraksha, Elaeocarpus , Phylogenetics, Neighbor Joining, Maximum Likelihood. I. INTRODUCTION Apart from India, the rudraksha tree is mainly found in Philippines, Manila, Australia, Myanmar, Bangladesh, The family Elaeocarpaceae is found in the subtropical Bhutan and Nepal. The rudraksha tree has medicinal regions with exception of some genera which are found and religious values especially in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Pub TR4 30.Pdf
    THE lNTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BAN DON BAY AND PHANGNGA BAY, THAILAND vd T~~H~TEGRATEDMANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BAN DON BAY AND PHANGNGA BAY, THAILAND Office of the National Environment Board. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment Bangkok, Thailand Association of Southeast Asian NationsIUnited States Coastal Resources Management Project Technical Publications Series 8 JAN 3 1 1994 The Integrated Management Plan for Ban Don Bay and Phangnga Bay, Thailand OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL ENV~RONMENTBOARD MINISTRY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOU~AND ENVIRONMENT BANGKOK, THAILAND Published by the International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management on behalf of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations/ United States Coastal Resources Management Project. Printed in Manila, Philippines. ONEB-MSTE (Office of the National Environment Board-Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment). 1992. The integrated management plan for Ban Don Bay and Phangnga Bay, Thailand. ICLARM Tech. Rep. 30,161 p. Cover design by Aque. ISSN 0115-5517 ISBN 971-8709-16-9 ICLARM Contribution No. 779 CONTENTS List of Tables ix List of Figures X List of Acronyms and Abbreviations xii Conversion Rates, 1972-1992 xiv Editorial Board XV Acknowledgments xvi xvii Executive Summary Chapter 1. Introduction Significance of the Coast Need for an Integrated Management Plan Context and Background of the Plan Subregional Development Study Sixth National Economic and Social Development Plan Upper South Development Program ASEAN/US Coastal Resources Management Project Planning Area Objectives of the Plan Chapter 2 Biophysical and Sodwconomic Setting Physical Setting Topography and geology Climate Soils Surface water resources Biological Setting Mangrove forests Wildlife habitats Marine fisheries Coral reefs Socioeconomic Setting Population Culture Standard of living Employment and productivity Infrastructure Energy Contents Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research is funded by UNESCO/MAB Young Scientist Award grant number SC/EES/AP/565.19, particularly from the Austrian MAB Committee as part of the International Year of Biodiversity. I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to the Man and Biosphere-LIPI (Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia) which was led by Prof. Endang Sukara (President of the MAB National Committee) and at present is substituted by Prof. Dr. Bambang Prasetya, Dr. Yohanes Purwanto (MAB National Committee) for endorsing this research, and Sri Handayani, S.Si. (MAB National Staff), also especially to the Mount Gede Pangrango National Park for allowing to work at Selabintana and Cisarua Resort, and the Carbon team members: Ahmad Jaeni, Dimas Ardiyanto, Eko Susanto, Mukhlis Soleh, Pak Rustandi and Pak Upah. Dr. Didik Widyatmoko, M.Sc., the director of Cibodas Botanic Garden for his encouragement and constructive remarks, Wiguna Rahman, S.P., Zaenal Mutaqien, S.Si. and Indriani Ekasari, M.P. my best colleagues for their discussions. Prof. Kurniatun Hairiah and Subekti Rahayu, M.Si. of World Agroforestry Center, M. Imam Surya, M.Si. of Scoula Superiore Sant’ Anna Italy also Utami Dyah Syafitri, M.Si. of Universiteit Antwerpen Belgium for intensive discussion, Mahendra Primajati, S.Si. of the Burung Indonesia for assisting with the map and Dr. Endah Sulistyawati of School of Life Sciences and Technology - Institut Teknologi Bandung for the great passion and inspiration. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vi
    [Show full text]
  • Pub TR4 20.Pdf
    i ,,,,, Thcoastal Environmental Profile of Ban Don Bay and Phangnga Bay, Thailand Edited by James N.8 P v,<Sirikul Bunpapong, Alan T. Whi "andMarie Sol M. Sadorra Association of Southeast Asian Nations1 United States Coastal Resources Management Project Technical Publications Series 2 The Coastal Environmental Profile of Ban Don Bay and Phangnga Bay, Thailand Edited by Published by the International Cenrer for Living Aquatic Resources Management on behalf of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations/Unired States Coastal Resout-ces Management Project PI-inted in Manila, Philippines Paw, J.N., S. Bunpapong, A.T. Wh~teand M.S.M. Sadorra, editors. 1988. The coastal environmental PI-ofile of Ban Don Bay and Phangnga Bay,Thailand. ICLARM Techn~calRepot-ts 20. 78 p. International Center for Living Aquatic Hesources Management, Manila, Philippines. Cover: False color composite landsat images of Ban Don Bay and Phangnga Bay linked together to show the whole Upper South, Thailand. ISSN 01 15 -5547 ISBN 971-1022-40-0 ICLARM Contribution No. 424 Contents List of Figures ................................................................ vii ... List of Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................. VIII Acknowledgements ............................................................. ix Forewords ................................................................... xi Introduction. Teerayut Poopetch and James W. Evans ...................................... xiv Chapter 1. The Upper South: Physical Setting and Land Use. Sirikul
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Swamp Forest Supports High Primate Densities on Siberut Island, Sumatra, Indonesia
    Oryx, The International Journal of Conservation Peat swamp forest supports high primate densities on Siberut Island, Sumatra, Indonesia Marcel C. Quinten, Matthias Waltert, Fauzan Syamsuri and J. Keith Hodges Appendix Tree species identifi ed in the peat swamp forest. Family Scientifi c name Mentawai name (where known) Annonaceae Polyalthia laterifl ora (Blume) King Attui Annonaceae Xylopia spp. Apocynaceae Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. Gite Burseraceae Triomma malaccensis Hook.f. Clusiaceae Calophyllum soulattri Burm.f. Bicaubi Dipterocarpaceae Vatica spp. Teppek Dipterocarpaceae Shorea spp. Pucaiguat Elaeocarpaceae Elaeocarpus spp. Elaeocarpaceae Elaeocarpus stipularis Blume Elaeocarpaceae Elaeocarpus glaber Blume Euphorbiaceae Macaranga tanarius (L.) Muell. Arg. Panaba Euphorbiaceae Aporosa grandistipula Merr. Taibelek Silala Euphorbiaceae Baccaurea defl exa Muell. Arg. Posa Fagaceae Lithocarpus spp. Gonystylaceae Gonystylus bancanus Baill. Icacinaceae Stemonurus scorpioides Becc. Icacinaceae Gonocaryum spp. Lauraceae Litsea robusta Blume Mangarajo Lauraceae Litsea noronhae Blume Lauraceae Litsea elliptica Blume Polaga Lauraceae Cryptocarya tomentosa Blume Lauraceae Actinodaphne macrophylla (Blume) Nees var. angustifolia Koord. & Valeton Malvaceae Hibiscus tiliaceus L. Melastomataceae Memecylon ovatum Sm. Pakatulu Meliaceae Sandoricum koetjape (Burm.f.) Merr. Moraceae Artocarpus dadah Miq. Peiki Moraceae Ficus spp. Lambo Myristicaceae Knema curtisii (King) Warb. Roat Myristicaceae Knema sumatrana (Blume) W.J.de Wilde Logauna Myristicaceae
    [Show full text]