DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Management Plan Environmental and Social Assessment of Kakarbhitta-Pathalaiya Road Section, including Kamala-Dhalkebar-Pathalaiya of EWH Public Disclosure Authorized Government of Nepal Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport Department of Roads Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) Report Of Kakarbhitta – Pathalaiya Road Corridor, including Kamala -Dhalkebar Public Disclosure Authorized – Pathalaiya Road Segment, of Mahendra Highway (MRM) CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: NIRTTP-DOR-S-QCBS-2 Submitted to: Department of Roads, Foreign Cooperation Branch, NIRTTP And Public Disclosure Authorized Geo-Environment and Social Unit (GESU), Chakupat, Lalitpur Kathmandu, Nepal Prepared by: JV of Environment & Resource Management Consultant (P) Ltd.; Group of Engineer’s Consortium (P) Ltd. And Udaya Consultancy (P.) Ltd. Public Disclosure Authorized January 2020 i Environmental and Social Assessment of Kakarbhitta-Pathalaiya Road Section, including Kamala-Dhalkebar-Pathalaiya of EWH Table of Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ vii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ viii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this Document ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Structure of the Report ................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Methods adopted to prepare the ESA Report ............................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2: Regulatory and policy network for ESA process in Nepal ................................................ 4 2.1 Legal requirements in Nepal ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Legal and institutional framework for EIA and IEE process in Nepal ....................................... 5 2.3 International agreements and treaties .......................................................................................... 7 2.4 World Bank Environment and Social Framework ...................................................................... 8 World Bank ESF Policy, Directives and Standards – Extent of Relevance ......................................................... 8 2.5 Analysis of legal and institutional issues and gaps in implementation of social and environmental plans ........................................................................................................................ 14 CHAPTER 3: Project Description .......................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Motivation of the Project .......................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Site Description ......................................................................................................................... 18 3.3 Project Area of Influence .......................................................................................................... 18 3.5 Description of the Project Area................................................................................................. 18 CHAPTER 4: Baseline Conditions ......................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Physical Environment and Selected Valued Environmental Components (VECs) .................. 21 4.1.1. Topography and Geomorphology ..................................................................................... 22 4.1.2. Natural Drainage and Watershed Management ................................................................ 23 4.1.3. Soils ............................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.4 Land Use ................................................................................................................................ 27 4.1.5. Atmosphere (Air and Noise, Solid Waste Management etc.) ........................................... 27 4.2 Biological Environment and Selected Valued Environmental Components ............................ 30 4.2.1. Environmentally Sensitive Areas ...................................................................................... 30 ii Environmental and Social Assessment of Kakarbhitta-Pathalaiya Road Section, including Kamala-Dhalkebar-Pathalaiya of EWH 4.2.2. Terrestrial Habitat ......................................................................................................... 41 4.2.3. Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................. 46 4.2.4. Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................ 48 4.3 Socio-economic and Cultural Environment and Selected Valued Social Components (VSCs) ......................................................................................................................................................... 53 4.3.1. Land and Resource Use .................................................................................................... 53 4.3.2. Population, Infrastructure and Services ............................................................................ 55 4.3.3. Economy and Well-being ................................................................................................. 57 4.3.4. Community Life ................................................................................................................ 58 CHAPTER 5: Analysis of Alternatives .................................................................................................. 61 5.1 Existing Issues and Predicted Impacts in the Project Area on Valued Components ................ 61 5.2 Alternative 1: “Do Nothing” ..................................................................................................... 62 5.3 Alternative 2: Upgrades of Existing Road to 4-lane Highway ................................................. 64 5.4 Site-specific Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 69 5.4.1. New Bridge Construction ................................................................................................. 69 5.4.2. By-pass Area in the Populated Urban Centers .................................................................. 70 5.4.3. Alternative Roads in Environmentally Sensitive Areas.................................................... 70 5.4.4. Coordinated Linear Structure Plans and Mitigation Measures ............................................. 70 5.4.5. Summary of Additional Adjustments to Design ................................................................... 71 CHAPTER 6: Significant Environmental Impacts ................................................................................. 78 6.1 Beneficial Issues ....................................................................................................................... 78 6.1.1. Construction Stage ................................................................................................................ 78 6.1.2. Operation Stage ..................................................................................................................... 79 6.2 Adverse Issues .......................................................................................................................... 82 6.2.1. Physical and Chemical Environment .................................................................................... 82 6.2.2. Biological Environment ........................................................................................................ 90 CHAPTER 7: Social Impacts................................................................................................................ 105 7.1 Socio-economic and Cultural Environment ............................................................................ 105 7.2 Adverse Impacts on Socio-economic Environment ........................................................... 106 7.3 Management Issues............................................................................................................. 109 7.5 Enhancement and Other Issues ............................................................................................... 110 CHAPTER 8: Assessment OF CUMULATIVE Impacts ............................................................... 111 8.1 Specific assessment of the Road Segments along the KP Corridor ....................................... 111 iii Environmental and Social Assessment of Kakarbhitta-Pathalaiya Road Section, including Kamala-Dhalkebar-Pathalaiya
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Development Constraints Nepal’S Pace of Growth and Poverty Reduction Has Lagged Behind That of Other South Asian Countries
    Nepal: Critical Development Constraints Nepal’s pace of growth and poverty reduction has lagged behind that of other South Asian countries. The country diagnostic study—Nepal: Critical Development Constraints—inquires into the causes for Nepal ’s slow growth vis-à-vis that of other South Asian economies by posing three questions: • What are the critical factors constraining investments, both domestic and foreign? • What should policy makers do to revive investment, particularly by the private sector? • How can the growth be made more inclusive? The inquiry and the results thereof aim to assist the work of government, development agencies, and the private sector to achieve a higher, more equitable growth path to benefit the people of Nepal. About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries substantially reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two thirds of the world’s poor: 1.8 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 903 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main instruments Nepal for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. About the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development Critical One in six people in the world today, almost 1 billion people, live in poverty on less than $1 a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Right Honorable Speaker, 1. I Feel Honored to Present the Budget For
    Right Honorable Speaker, 1. I feel honored to present the budget for the year 2009/10 as a Finance Minister of the coalition Government of Nepal formed under the support of the twenty-two among the twenty-four political parties of the Legislative- Parliament to build socialism oriented, just, nondiscriminatory, competent and prosperous Nepal by formulating the new Constitution as per the ideologies of the historic People’s Movement, Comprehensive Peace Accord and directive of the Constitution Assembly. On this occasion, I would like to express my deep-down tribute to the entire known and unknown Martyrs’ demised during the struggle to attain federal democratic republic in the country. Further, I would like to honor the wounded and warriors of the Peoples Movement. 2. The major priorities of the coalition government are building consensus among all the political parties; constitutional supremacy; rule of law; guaranteeing the good-governance; bring the peace process to a logical end by implementing all the agreements signed and consensus reached in the past to end the anarchy, lawlessness and insecurity; promulgating the new constitution with national consensus within stipulated time-frame; and accelerating economic growth by state restructuring and socio-economic transformation. The proposed budget is based on the background of these major priorities and Three-Year Interim Plan. 3. For a long time, in spite of our country's immense diversity, all the linguistic, religious, cultural and ethnic groups as well as the people of different genders and geographical areas couldn't get equal treatment from the country because of the existence of monarchial feudal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal
    FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY OCTOBER(JICA) 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONALNIPPON KOEI COOPERATION CO., LTD. AGENCY VISION AND SPIRIT(JICA) FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION VISION AND SPIRIT FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. 4R C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION JR 13 - 031 FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Club Health Assessment MBR0087
    Club Health Assessment for District 325A1 through April 2021 Status Membership Reports Finance LCIF Current YTD YTD YTD YTD Member Avg. length Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Member Members Members Net Net Count 12 of service Since Last President Vice Since Last for current Club Club Charter Count Added Dropped Growth Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer Rotation President Activity Account Fiscal Number Name Date Ago members MMR *** Report Reported Report *** Balance Year **** Number of times If below If net loss If no When Number Notes the If no report on status quo 15 is greater report in 3 more than of officers thatin 12 months within last members than 20% months one year repeat do not haveappears in two years appears appears appears in appears in terms an active red Clubs less than two years old SC 138770 Bansbari 07/12/2019 Active 41 15 0 15 57.69% 26 0 N 1 $600.02 P,MC 138952 Bargachhi Green City 07/12/2019 Active 25 1 0 1 4.17% 24 4 N 5 142398 Biratnagar A One 08/09/2020 Active 32 32 0 32 100.00% 0 2 N 1 M,MC,SC 138747 Biratnagar Birat Medical 07/12/2019 Active 21 1 0 1 5.00% 20 3 N 3 90+ Days P,S,T,M,VP 138954 Biratnagar Capital City 07/12/2019 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 20 21 1 None N/R 90+ Days MC,SC M,MC,SC 140415 Biratnagar Entrepreneur 01/06/2020 Active 18 0 0 0 0.00% 20 10 2 R 10 90+ Days M 139007 Biratnagar Greater 07/12/2019 Active 31 8 3 5 19.23% 26 1 4 3 N 3 Exc Award (06/30/2020) VP 139016 Biratnagar Health Professional 07/12/2019 Active 26 4 1 3 13.04% 23 1 0 N 3 Exc Award (06/30/2020) 138394 Biratnagar Mahanagar
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3 Nepal Road Network
    2.3 Nepal Road Network Overview Primary Roads in Nepal Major Road Construction Projects Distance Matrix Road Security Weighbridges and Axle Load Limits Road Class and Surface Conditions Province 1 Province 2 Bagmati Province Gandaki Province Province 5 Karnali Province Sudurpashchim Province Overview Roads are the predominant mode of transport in Nepal. Road network of Nepal is categorized into the strategic road network (SRN), which comprises of highways and feeder roads, and the local road network (LRN), comprising of district roads and Urban roads. Nepal’s road network consists of about 64,500 km of roads. Of these, about 13,500 km belong to the SRN, the core network of national highways and feeder roads connecting district headquarters. (Picture : Nepal Road Standard 2070) The network density is low, at 14 kms per 100 km2 and 0.9 km per 1,000 people. 60% of the road network is concentrated in the lowland (Terai) areas. A Department of Roads (DoR’s) survey shows that 50% of the population of the hill areas still must walk two hours to reach an SRN road. Two of the 77 district headquarters, namely Humla, and Dolpa are yet to be connected to the SRN. Page 1 (Source: Sector Assessment [Summary]: Road Transport) Primary Roads in Nepal S. Rd. Name of Highway Length Node Feature Remarks N. Ref. (km) No. Start Point End Point 1 H01 Mahendra Highway 1027.67 Mechi Bridge, Jhapa Gadda chowki Border, East to West of Country Border Kanchanpur 2 H02 Tribhuvan Highway 159.66 Tribhuvan Statue, Sirsiya Bridge, Birgunj Connects biggest Customs to Capital Tripureshwor Border 3 H03 Arniko Highway 112.83 Maitighar Junction, KTM Friendship Bridge, Connects Chinese border to Capital Kodari Border 4 H04 Prithvi Highway 173.43 Naubise (TRP) Prithvi Chowk, Pokhara Connects Province 3 to Province 4 5 H05 Narayanghat - Mugling 36.16 Pulchowk, Naryanghat Mugling Naryanghat to Mugling Highway (PRM) 6 H06 Dhulikhel Sindhuli 198 Bhittamod border, Dhulikhel (ARM) 135.94 Km.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • On in Final Report
    No. Nepal Electricity Authority Nepal UPGRADING FEASIBILITY STUDY ON UPPER SETI (DAMAULI) STORAGE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT IN NEPAL FINAL REPORT June 2007 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ELECTRIC POWER DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. E D J R 07-074 PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of Nepal, the Government of Japan decided to conduct the Upgrading Feasibility Study on Upper Seti (Damauli) Storage Hydroelectric Project, and the study was implemented by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team headed by Mr. Yoshimasa Ishii of Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. (J-Power), and consist of J-Power and Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. to Nepal five times from February 2005 to June 2007. The study team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of Nepal and Nepal Electricity Authority, and conducted related field surveys. After returning to Japan, the study team compiled the final results in this report. I hope this report will contribute to stabilization of power supply in Nepal and to enhancement of friendly relations between our two countries. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of Nepal for their close cooperation throughout the study. June 2007 Tadashi IZAWA Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency June 2007 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Mr. Tadashi Izawa Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency Tokyo, Japan We are pleased to submit to you the report on the Upgrading Feasibility Study on Upper Seti (Damauli) Storage Hydroelectric Project in Nepal. This study has been conducted by Electric Power Development Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Nepal
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Nepal Forests for Prosperity Project Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) March 8, 2020 Executive Summary 1. This Environment and Social Management Framework (ESMF) has been prepared for the Forests for Prosperity (FFP) Project. The Project is implemented by the Ministry of Forest and Environment and funded by the World Bank as part of the Nepal’s Forest Investment Plan under the Forest Investment Program. The purpose of the Environmental and Social Management Framework is to provide guidance and procedures for screening and identification of expected environmental and social risks and impacts, developing management and monitoring plans to address the risks and to formulate institutional arrangements for managing these environmental and social risks under the project. 2. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve sustainable forest management1; increase benefits from forests and contribute to net Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) reductions in selected municipalities in provinces 2 and 5 in Nepal. The short-to medium-term outcomes are expected to increase overall forest productivity and the forest sector’s contribution to Nepal’s economic growth and sustainable development including improved incomes and job creation in rural areas and lead to reduced Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and increased climate resilience. This will directly benefit the communities, including women and disadvantaged groups participating in Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) as well and small and medium sized entrepreneurs (and their employees) involved in forest product harvesting, sale, transport and processing. Indirect benefits are improved forest cover, environmental services and carbon capture and storage 3. The FFP Project will increase the forest area under sustainable, community-based and productive forest management and under private smallholder plantations (mainly in the Terai), resulting in increased production of wood and non-wood forest products.
    [Show full text]
  • Final SMART Saptari BGU
    Final Report Anthropometric Nutrition And Retrospective Mortality Survey Saptari District, Nepal 12-24 June 2013 Jorunn Smith 1 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of figures ............................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 9 Objective of survey ....................................................................................................................... 9 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 9 Main results .................................................................................................................................. 9 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.
    [Show full text]