DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of FARA 1.0 Outcomes on the Capacity of MOH and Chts, and the Quality of Service Provision at Health Facilities in Liberia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of FARA 1.0 Outcomes on the Capacity of MOH and Chts, and the Quality of Service Provision at Health Facilities in Liberia Assessment of FARA 1.0 Outcomes on the Capacity of MOH and CHTs, and the Quality of Service Provision at Health Facilities in Liberia April 25, 2017 This document was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by InterMedia under the Liberia Strategic Analysis activity under contract AID-669-C-16-00002. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 3 List of Figures and Tables.............................................................................................................................. 3 Map of Liberia and Evaluated Facilities ......................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Key Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................... 6 Theme 1 – FARA 1.0 Impact ................................................................................................................ 6 Theme 2 – General Capacity / Level of Service Provision ................................................................... 8 Theme 3 –Infrastructure Gap Analysis ................................................................................................. 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Objective ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................ 11 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 13 Design...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Respondent Selection and Site Evaluation Sampling ............................................................................... 14 Limitations ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Findings ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 Theme 1 – FARA 1.0 Impact (RQs 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8)............................................................................... 16 Research Question 3 .......................................................................................................................... 16 Research Question 4 .......................................................................................................................... 17 Research Question 5 .......................................................................................................................... 18 Research Question 7 .......................................................................................................................... 20 Research Question 8 .......................................................................................................................... 20 Theme 2 – General Capacity/Level of Service Provision (RQs 1, 2 and 6) ........................................... 23 Research Question 1 .......................................................................................................................... 23 Research Question 2 .......................................................................................................................... 26 Research Question 6 .......................................................................................................................... 27 Theme 3 – Infrastructure Gap Analysis (RQs 9 and 10) ........................................................................ 29 Research Question 9 .......................................................................................................................... 29 Research Question 10 ........................................................................................................................ 31 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................................. 33 Theme 1 – FARA 1.0 Impact (RQs 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8)............................................................................... 33 Theme 2 – General Capacity / Level of Service Provision (RQs 1, 2 and 6) ......................................... 33 Theme 3 – Infrastructure Gap Analysis (RQs 9 and 10) ........................................................................ 35 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................... 36 Annex I: Desk Review Material............................................................................................................... 36 Annex II: Qualitative Fieldwork Participants .......................................................................................... 37 Annex III: Evaluated Facilities .................................................................................................................. 39 1 Annex IV: Qualitative Interview Guide ................................................................................................... 44 Annex V: Self-Assessment Questionnaires ............................................................................................. 45 Annex V.A – Central MOH Self-Assessment Questionnaire – USAID/Liberia FARA ...................... 45 Annex V.B – CHT Self-Assessment Questionnaire – USAID/Liberia FARA ..................................... 58 Annex VI: Facility Evaluation Form ......................................................................................................... 69 Annex VII: Analysis Outputs ................................................................................................................... 76 Annex VII.A – Output from Self-Assessment (MOH), Mean Score by Instrument Item .................. 76 Annex VII.B – Output from Self-Assessment (CHT), Mean Score by Instrument Item and Respondent Location .......................................................................................................................... 77 Annex VII.C – Output from Coding of Qualitative Interviews, Mean Score by Instrument Item and Respondent Location .......................................................................................................................... 78 Annex VII.D – Output from Coding of Qualitative Interviews, Inter-Rater Reliability Testing ........ 80 Annex VII.E – Output from Facility Evaluation Form, Mean Score by Instrument Item and Facility Type (i.e., FARA vs. Non-FARA) ........................................................................................................ 81 Annex VII.F – Output from Facility Evaluation Form, Mean Score by Instrument Item and Facility Type within FARA Counties ............................................................................................................... 86 Annex VII.G – Output from Facility Evaluation Form, Mean Score by Instrument Item and Facility Location .............................................................................................................................................. 91 Annex VII.H – Analysis of Differences in Performance on Facility Evaluation by Sets of Facility Type and Location........................................................................................................................................ 97 Annex VIII – Scope of Work .................................................................................................................. 99 2 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations CHT County Health Team EPHS Essential Package of Health Services EVD Ebola Virus Disease FARA Fixed Amount Reimbursement Agreement FGD Focus Group Discussion HFAS Health Facility Assessment Specialist HSCBE Health Sector Capacity Building Expert GoL Government of Liberia HMIS Health Management Information System KII Key Informant Interview LSA Liberia Strategic Analysis MOH Ministry of Health PBC Performance-based Contract PFMRAF Public Financial Management Risk Assessment Framework RBHS Rebuilding Basic Health Services SARA Service Availability and Readiness Assessment USAID United States Agency for International Development WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene List of Figures and Tables FIGURES Figure 1 – Rank Ordered Facility Evaluation Scores, By Facility Type 7 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberia BULLETIN Bimonthly Published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia
    LibeRIA BULLETIN Bimonthly published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia 1 October 2004 Vol. 1, Issue No. 4 Voluntary Repatriation Started October 1, 2004 The inaugural convoys of 77 Liberian refugees from Sierra Leone and 97 from Ghana arrived to Liberia on October 1, 2004, which marked the commencement of the UNHCR voluntary repatriation. Only two weeks prior to the beginning of the repatriation, the County Resettlement Assessment Committee (CRAC) pro- claimed four counties safe for return – Grand Cape Mount, Bomi, Gbarpolu and Margibi. The first group of refugees from Sierra Leone is returning to their homes in Grand Cape Mount. UNHCR is only facilitating re- turns to safe areas. Upon arrival, returnees have the option to spend a couple of nights in transit centers (TC) before returning to their areas of origin. At the TC, they received water, cooked meals, health care, as well as a two-months resettlement ration and a Non- Signing of Tripartite Agreement with Guinea Food Items (NFI) package. With the signing of the Tripartite Agreements, which took place in Accra, Ghana, on September 22, 2004 with the Ghanian government and in Monrovia, Liberia, on September 27, 2004 with the governments of Si- erra Leone, Guinea and Cote d’Ivorie, binding agree- ment has been established between UNHCR, asylum countries and Liberia. WFP and UNHCR held a regional meeting on Septem- ber 27, 2004 in Monrovia and discussed repatriation plans for Liberian refugees and IDPs. WFP explained that despite the current food pipeline constraints, the repatriation of refugees remains a priority for the Country Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Environmental Profile
    Liberia environmental profile This report is financed by the European commission and is presented by Agreco G.E.I.E for the Government of Liberia and the European Commission. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Government or the European Commission. Authors: Dr Giorgio V. Brandolini, agronomist, biodiversity expert Dr Mohammed Tigani, environmental policy and management expert (industry, water, and waste management) Monrovia, December 2006 1 List of abbreviations and acronims Acronims GoL Government of Liberia iPRS interim Poverty Reduction Strategy PRSP Poverty reduction strategy paper DDRR Disarmament, Demobilisation, Reinsertion and Reintegration NIP EDF 9 National Indicative Programme 9th EDF 9th European development fund CSP Country Strategy Paper NIP National Indicative Programme 10th EDF 10th European development fund EPA Environmental Protection Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment MEAs Multilateral Environmental Agreements CEP Country Environmental Profile MDG 7 Millenium development goals 7 FLEGT Eu action plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade 2 Table of contents 1. Summary..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 10 3. State of the environment ........................................................................................................... 11 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Subproject Briefs
    Liberia Energy Sector Support Program (LESSP) Subproject Briefs 8 July 2013 LESSP Subprojects Introduction • Seven Infrastructure Subprojects – OBJECTIVE 2 – Pilot RE Subprojects • Two hydro (one Micro [15 kW] and one Mini [1,000 kW]) • Two biomass power generation – OBJECTIVE 3 – Support to Liberia Energy Corporation (LEC) • 1000 kW Photovoltaic Power Station interconnected to LEC’s grid • 15 km Electric Distribution Line Extension to University of Liberia (UL) Fendell Campus – OBJECTIVE 3 - Grants – Public Private Partnership • One Biomass Power Generation Research and Demonstration (70 kW) • Total Cost: $ 13.97 Million USD (Engineer’s Estimate) • Service to: More than an estimated 72,000 Liberians (3,600 households and over 160 businesses and institutions) Subprojects Summary Data Project Cost, Service No LESSP Subprojects County kW Beneficiaries USD Population Million Mein River Mini Hydropower Subproject Bong 7.25 Over 3000 households, 150 1 1,000 Over 25,000 businesses and institutions Wayavah Falls Micro Hydropower Subproject Lofa 0.45 150 households and 4-5 2 15 Over 1,000 businesses/institutions Kwendin Biomass Electricity Subproject Nimba 0.487 248 households, a clinic, and a 3 60 Over 2,000 school Sorlumba Biomass Electricity Subproject Lofa 0.24 206 households, 8 institutions 4 35 Over 1,500 and businesses Grid connected 1 MW Solar PV Subproject Montserrado 3.95 5 1,000 LEC grid Over 15,000 MV Distribution Line Extension to Fendell Montserrado 1.12 6 Fendell Campus Over 25,000 Campus Establishment of the Liberia Center for Biomass Margibi 0.467 7 70 BWI Campus, RREA Over 2,200 Energy at BWI TOTAL - 5 counties 13.97 2,161 3,600 households and over 160 Over 72,000 businesses and institutions Liberia Energy Sector Support Program Subproject Brief: Mein River 1 MW Mini-Hydropower Subproject Location Suakoko District, Bong County (7o 8’ 11”N 9o 38’ 27” W) General Site The power house is 3 km uphill from the nearest road, outside the eco- Description tourism area of the Lower Kpatawee Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacebuilding Fund in Liberia
    PEACEBUILDING FUND IN LIBERIA TERMINAL EVALAUTION OF THE SMALL GRANTS PROJECT AWARDED TO LIBERIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS May 2011 Oscar Bloh and Julius Tokpa 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Acronyms 4 Executive Summary/Findings 5-6 Recommendations 6-7 Introduction 8 Methodology 9 Critical Issues 10-12 Conclusion 13 Appendices 14-33 2 Acknowledgements The evaluation would not have been completed without the support and cooperation of many individuals. The PBO team was very supportive of the exercise. The evaluators want to acknowledge their cooperation and support. The partners to the project were readily available for interviews despite short notice. The evaluators extend appreciation to beneficiaries who took time from their daily activities to grant interviews. Finally, the evaluator appreciates the input and comments on the draft report made by staff of PBO. At the same time, the evaluators take full responsibility for any errors, omissions, or misrepresentations in the report. 3 ACRONYMNS CEDE: Center for Democratic Empowerment CUPPDL: Citizens United to Promote Peace and Democracy in Liberia FIND: Foundation of International Dignity IMEDD: Institute for Media Development and Dignity LINNK: Liberia Non-Government Organization Network PBF: Peace Building Fund PBRC: Peace Building Resource Center PRS: Poverty Reduction Strategy RICCE: Rural Integrated Center for Community Empowerment and Concerned Women Group in Doumpa and Zuaplay UNHCR: United Nations High Commission for Refugees UNDP: United Nations Development Programme WANEP: West Africa Network for Peace Building WONGOSOL: Women NGO Secretariat of Liberia 4 Executive Summary: The small grants provided by the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) to civil society organizations (CSOs) were intended to support the consolidation of peace in Liberia at the same time creating opportunities for strengthening the institutional and programmatic capacities of CSOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Education Update June 2019
    Liberia Education Update June 2019 Liberia Career Pathways Training Liberia Career Pathways (LCP) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is “to empower and support Liberian Learners to progress through and transition from high quality education and training experiences into rewarding careers for Liberia’s economic growth.” The LCP office is in the compound of the Liberia Annual Conference Central Office where I work. During the 2018/2019 school year, LCP’s Career Clubs met weekly at Tubman High School (the government high school in Sinkor, Monrovia), St. Peters Lutheran High School in Sinkor, and Booker Washington Institute in Kakata. During one-hour club meetings, the Career Club Coordinators guide high school students as they work through the 9 modules of their career journals to identify their strengths and interests, match them to careers, begin to set goals, and chart courses to meet those goals. The government high school in Gbarnga, Bong County, and Ganta United Methodist School (UMS) in Nimba County will have Career Clubs in the new school year. To refresh the current Club Coordinators and provide orientation for the incoming Coordinators, I facilitated a 3-day workshop (May 27-29) using Michigan State University’s 4-H career planning guide and student journal, Build Your Future: Choices… Connections…Careers. On the second day of the workshop, Roger Domah, the former principal of Ganta UMS and current Nimba County representative, stopped by unexpectedly to greet his former colleagues, Rev. Joseph Dolo (Guidance Counselor) and Mr. Lawrence Gorblay (Dean of Students), who will be the Ganta UMS Career Club Coordinators.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Fertility Differentials in Liberia and Ghana Using Multilevel
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON An Analysis of Fertility Differentials in Liberia and Ghana Using Multilevel Models. By Nicholas John Parr Doctor of Philosophy Department of Social Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences April 1992 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL STATISTICS Doctor of Philosophy AN ANALYSIS OF FERTILITY DIFFERENTIALS IN LIBERIA AND GHANA USING MULTILEVEL MODELS by Nicholas John Parr This thesis investigates differentials in the levels of fertility, nuptiality and contraceptive use in Liberia and Ghana, using data from the recent Demographic and Health Surveys in these countries. Of particular interest is the effect of the community in which a woman lives on her current and past fertility, her marital status and her use of contraception. This interest stems from the fact that, although the community in which a woman lives is integral to anthropological explanations of fertility, statistical models of fertility have rarely included an assessment of community effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Food Needs Project
    ◙DAN .:: emergency needs assessment branch INDEPENDENT FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT IN LIBERIA Food security and nutrition survey in Lofa, Nimba, and Montserrado Counties June 2005 United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) Rome Independent Food Security Assessment in Liberia © 2005 United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) Via Cesare Giulio Viola 68/70, Parco de Medici, 00148, Rome, Italy Emergency Needs Assessment Branch (ODAN), Operation Department Chief: Wolfgang Herbinger Project Manager: Hirotsugu Aiga Tel: +39-06-6513-3276 Fax: +39-06-6513-3080 Email: [email protected] This study was funded by UK Department for International Development (DfID) ii Forewords There has been a growing demand for more accurate and evidence-based emergency needs assessments in recent years. World Food Programme (WFP), as one of the main channels for humanitarian assistance, responded to these calls by organizing several consultations with experts, partner agencies and donors to identify the areas for improvement and develop a strategy for strengthening its capacities in emergency needs assessments. WFP's Executive Board endorsed this strategy which involves the preparation of a Emergency Food Security Assessment (EFSA) handbook, research work on assessment methodologies, investment in improved food security information in selected disaster-prone countries and a stand-by capacity for "independent assessments". Establishing a capacity for "independent assessments" seeks to address existing shortcomings in three areas: (a) meeting assessment needs in countries without a WFP Country Office; (b) augmentation of assessment capacities in countries with limited WFP Country Office capacities; and (c) provision of an external perspective in countries where earlier assessments have been contested. The report presented here falls into the second category.
    [Show full text]
  • Foya District P.2 Kolahun District P.3 Salayea District P.4 Vahun District P.5 Voinjama & Quardu Boundi District P.6 Zorzor District P.7
    LIBERIA LOFA COUNTY ATLAS Foya district p.2 Kolahun district p.3 Salayea district p.4 Vahun district p.5 Voinjama & Quardu Boundi district p.6 Zorzor district p.7 Foya District - Lofa Wobu Kenor! ! Information Maa Woda Customs ! ! ¯ Maah Telabengo Area: 45.5 hectares Wodu ! Paboda Balladu ! !Gbazzie ! Number of buildings: 1850 ! ! Gbongbodu Guinea Bakia Blaza Bomlado ! Percentage of Residential building: 97.5% Codo ! Bandenin Solumba Melimu Bandaloe Lorloe! ! ! Bandune ! ! Slomba Kpaloloe Peokorko! ! Sorlumba Bandola ! Pondo Lapaloe GF Melimala Lepaloe-Melimu ! ! ! Tembio Tailikorlor ! ! Koindu !Yeolo ! ! Konjoe Ndenhuma Maimah Baah ! Tuladu ! ! ! ! Kpandu Kenema ! Forbayma Bandella ! Termessadu Ndagadu! Fanda Kodu ! ! Kondobengu-Waum Bengu ! ! ! Koingor Candodo ! ! Kpogoma ! Lepalloe Bedu ! ! ! Calasu Woldu Wokoima Yealloe ! Tengia Koimei Phallo Tarma ! Kpelloe ! Kpandu ! Pundandu ! ! ! Fembandu Wuam ! Kparmbu Mendicorma Korlorsu ! Jimmitta ! ! Kpandikamadu Limbalo ! Kilima Kenema ! ! Wonjoe ! GF ! Senesu! Bendu ! ! ! Borliloe Kornorsue II Magoganga Solapie ! ! Tolmadu Dopa ! Sakpawai Waum Saama ! Jimmita ! Kornorsue I Massabangah I ! Junction Tormandu Yalladu ! ! Pailuan ! ! ! ! Koisua Lolionin ! Koindu Bongai ! Morgor Nwor ! ! ! Warkongor Kumasadu ! Massabangah II ! ! Bolemba Kwemei Bandenin ! ! Faifaidu Farcee ! Kporlornin Lapalo ! Dawusu ! ! Lor Kpamai ! Nwou ! ! ! Kolochoe Koisua GF !Yengbemai Kunandu ! ! Kpalawu ! ! ! Bolobengu Ndendu Lorloe ! Kissiko ! Youlo ! ! Salalloe ! Yendema ! Bambuloe ! Porluma Fassa Tongolahun ! Farmah
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Two Systems of Surveillance Operating in Burundi at Present
    LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2017 1 LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) April 2017 This publication was prepared by Stephen Browne and Amadou Diop for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), in collaboration with the Liberian Ministry of Agriculture, USAID Liberia, WFP, and FAO. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Page 2 of 60 Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 Background and Introduction......................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 8 National Livelihood Zone Map .......................................................................................................12 National Seasonal Calendar ..........................................................................................................13 Timeline of Shocks and Hazards ....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 188Th Annual Session Liberia Annual Conference the United Methodist Church
    Office of Connectional Ministries Liberia Annual Conference The United Methodist Church Connectional Ministries 2020 Annual Program Performance R E P O R T Presented to 188th Annual Session Liberia Annual Conference The United Methodist Church Performance Review Contents 1.0 Introduction & Overview 01 a) Program Management & Implementation 01 b) Strategic Direction Engagements 04 2.0 Program Performance & Ministry Actions 06 a) Pillar One - Evangelism, Spiritual Formation and Mission 06 b) Pillar Two - Financial and Infrastructure Management, Accountability & Stewardship 12 c) Pillar Three - Agriculture & Rural Development 18 d) Pillar Four - Education, Human Capacity Development & Outreach 23 e) Pillar Five - Health & Social Welfare 46 f) Pillar Six - Peace, Reconciliation and Unity 80 g) Pillar Seven - Age–Level Ministries 85 h) Pillar Eight - Ecumenical Relations and Connectional Partnerships 102 3.0 Next Steps & Conclusion 103 a) Program Mid-Term Performance Appraisal b) Ministry Review and Conclusion Submitted by: Rev. George D. Wilson, Jr., Director Office of Connectional Ministries, LAC-UMC Approved: Rev. Dr. J. Sarwolo Nelson, Jr., Acting Chairperson Council on Connectional Ministries & Strategic Connectional Ministries - 2020 Annual Report Commission, LAC-UMC 0 | P a g e Office of Connectional Ministries Liberia Annual Conference United Methodist Church Corner of Tubman Boulevard & 12th Street, Sinkor Monrovia - Liberia 1.0 Introduction & Overview The Office of Connectional Ministries of the Liberia Annual Conference is honored to present its program performance report for activities undertaken over the last conference year, March 2020 – February 2021. Thou challenged by the global health pandemic, and occasioned by the shot-down of routine activities, the Liberia Episcopal Area undertook a number activities that provided basic health services as well as humanitarian support.
    [Show full text]
  • UNMEER) External Situation Report 4 March 2015
    UN Mission for Ebola Emergency Response (UNMEER) External Situation Report 4 March 2015 KEY POINTS Presidents of the affected countries call for a ‘Marshall Plan’ UNMEER Sierra Leone sustains support to District Ebola Response Centers National Assembly President continues EVD advocacy field visits Key Political and Economic Developments 1. On 3 March, the European Union hosted the “Ebola: from emergency to recovery” conference in Brussel. The aim of the conference was to sustain the international mobilization, ensure pledged resources are made available to support response efforts, promote regional cooperation, assist West Africa to plan the next steps in the fight against EVD and assist the countries build resilient health systems to help secure that no other epidemic will have such devastating impact in the future as well as improve governance and accountability in the affected countries. President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia, President Ernest Bai Koroma of Sierra Leone and President Alpha Condé of Guinea thanked the EU and international community for their continued support in the fight to zero EVD transmission and reiterated their call for a "Marshall Plan" to rebuild their shattered economies. President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, noted among others that”to end Ebola and ensure sustainable development in the affected region is the best way to honour the memory of the victims”. The conference was co-chaired by the EU, the Presidents of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, the UN, the AU and ECOWAS. SRSG Ould Cheikh Ahmed and Special Envoy Nabarro attended the conference. 2. On 3 March, the President of the National Assembly of Guinea continued his advocacy tour by visiting N’zérékoré to support local authorities in the fight against Ebola.
    [Show full text]
  • First State of the Environment Report for Liberia - 2006 First State of the Environment Report for Liberia - 2006
    FIRST STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT FOR LIBERIA - 2006 FIRST STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT FOR LIBERIA - 2006 Copyright © 2006 United Nations Development Programme This report has been prepared by the United Nations Development Programme for the Government of Liberia. Reproduction of this publication for educational or any other non- commercial purpose is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other purposes is prohibited without the prior permission in writing from the Government. Produced by UNDP P.O. Box 274 Monrovia, Liberia Vsat: 0031205407121 or 122 Fax: +31205407127 E-M: [email protected] In Collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Liberia P.O. Box 4024 4th Street, Tubman Blvd., Sinkor 1000 Monrovia 10, Liberia ii Table of contents FOREWORD...........................................................................................................................................................vi Acknowledgement..............................................................................................................................................viii Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................ix 1 OVERVIEW OF LIBERIA’S ENVIRONMENT ...........................................................................................11 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]