DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent Wildlife Trust Trustee Report and Consolidated Financial Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kent Wildlife Trust Trustee Report and Consolidated Financial Statements Registered number: 00633098 Charity number: 239992 Kent Wildlife Trust (A company limited by guarantee) Trustees' report and consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017 Kent Wildlife Trust (A company limited by guarantee) Contents Page Reference and administrative details of the charity, its honorary officers and 1 advisers Chairman's statement 2 Trustees' report 3 - 12 Independent auditor's report 13 - 15 Consolidated statement of financial activities 16 Consolidated income and expenditure account 17 Consolidated balance sheet 18 Charity balance sheet 19 Consolidated statement of cash flows 20 Notes to the financial statements 21 - 46 Kent Wildlife Trust (A company limited by guarantee) Reference and administrative details of the charity, its honorary officers and advisers for the year ended 31 December 2017 Honorary officers Michael Bax, Chairman Charles Tassell, Vice Chairman Graham Hill, Honorary Secretary Nigel Steele, Honorary Treasurer Company registered number 00633098 Charity registered number 239992 Registered office Tyland Barn, Sandling, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 3BD Chief executive officer John Bennett Independent auditor Kreston Reeves LLP, Montague Place, Quayside, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4QU Bankers Barclays Bank Plc, 80 High Street, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN13 1LR Solicitors Gullands, 16 Mill Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 6XT Investment Managers Sarasin & Partners LLP, Juxon House, 100 St Paul's Churchyard, London, EC4M 8BU Page 1 Kent Wildlife Trust (A company limited by guarantee) Chairman's statement for the year ended 31 December 2017 Chairman’s Introduction 2017 was a dramatic year for Kent Wildlife Trust with important additions to our reserves and important developments in our plans for meeting and working with people. Developments identified in 2015 in our five year strategy began to consolidate, promising new systems to save money and much of this underlined by key staff changes which promises a yet more exciting 2018. Kent Wildlife Trust is a complex community and every part of which contributes to and is key to our sustained achievement. Members, long term and newly enrolled, give us strength, a voice and confidence in the future. Benefactors, Charitable Trusts and Lottery funds help drive new initiatives. Volunteers on nature reserves, in wildlife gardens, lookering, monitoring, on Sea Search and greeting visitors give us a public face and the capacity to reach out yet further to new audiences. Our partners, businesses, farmers, public agencies, by their recognition of the contribution Kent Wildlife Trust can make to their work and the County give our work a wider, economic validation. The staff and Trustees sit at the heart of this huge community providing direction and a common face. During the year Kent Wildlife Trust and I were actively challenged in a social media campaign. The Campaign has caused us to examine carefully our policies drawing on the diverse views from members and other parts of our audience and the nature of the national conversation and as a result recommitted ourselves to the policy of neutrality. As 2017 leads to 2018 it is clear that we are moving into an exciting and positive time. The Government is paying more attention to its environmental responsibilities than it has for many years The Chief Executive for 20 years, John Bennett, is leaving and there are other important staff changes that will prepare Kent Wildlife Trust for the future. Thank you all for joining me as part of the rich community which is Kent Wildlife Trust. Name Michael Bax Chairman Date Page 2 Kent Wildlife Trust (A company limited by guarantee) Trustees' report for the year ended 31 December 2017 The Council of Management (Board of Trustees) presents its report and the audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017. The Message from the chairman set out in the previous pages forms part of this report. The financial statements comply with the current statutory requirements, the Memorandum and Articles of Association and the Statement of Recommended Practice – Accounting and Reporting by Charities. Status The organisation is a charitable company limited by guarantee, incorporated on 21 July 1959 and registered as a charity on 1 January 1961. Governing document The organisation was established under a Memorandum of Association which establishes the objects and powers of the organisation and is governed under its Articles of Association. AIMS, ACTIVITIES AND ACHIEVEMENTS In 2017 we progressed our BIG vision towards ensuring that by 2035, 30% of Kent and Medway – land and sea – is managed to create a healthy place for wildlife to flourish. As we enter the latter stages of our current strategy, this review outlines some of our achievements during 2017 towards our ambitions. Six key Strategic Objectives have been guiding our work: 1. Protecting and restoring biodiversity 2. Maintaining the land and sea that we already manage and influence 3. Increasing the area on land and at sea we manage and/or successfully influence 4. Positioning Kent Wildlife Trust as a key driver playing a critical role in responding to economic, societal and environmental challenges facing Kent 5. Maintain, develop and invest in existing and additional sources of income 6. Develop a compelling lifelong engagement with the Trust amongst families, communities, organisations and decision makers with a clear cut progression route from passive engagement to ambassadorial roles Our Big Vision of 30% of land and sea under good conservation management is both grand and necessary. It will ensure we meet the guiding principles of our vision for living landscapes and living seas of bigger, better and more joined up habitats for wildlife. It will reconnect people with their natural environment providing places for both people and wildlife to flourish. With the active support of a range of organisations, partners and stakeholders this becomes a realistic and achievable target. Currently designated areas (Ramsar sites, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protected Areas, National Nature Reserves, Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Local Nature Reserves) and nature reserves and woodland occupy 16% of the land area of Kent and Medway. The Trust’s engagement with partners in the wider countryside brings this to approximately 17% and provides the robust starting point from which we will work with partners to secure the rest of the vision. 1 Protect and restore biodiversity, translating strategy and policy to action Our work to monitor and understand the impact of our conservation work across the wider landscape continues to grow in strength. This is led by a new monitoring strategy implemented in 2016/17 which has now completed ecological monitoring work in nine landscape areas and 28 reserves. Page 3 Kent Wildlife Trust (A company limited by guarantee) Trustees' report (continued) for the year ended 31 December 2017 The Fifth Continent Landscape Partnership project is leading a Monitoring on the Marsh project, delivering species and habitat monitoring across Romney Marsh, training new volunteers in identification and surveying skills. The Riversearch citizen science monitoring project continues to grow along the River Eden, with 30 trained volunteers, and will soon be rolled out onto other rivers in Kent. Kent Wildlife Trust continues to monitor the condition of Kent’s 467 Local Wildlife Sites. Only 43% of these were classified as being in conservation management, highlighting the threat to wildlife sites from lack of management. Together with the continuing pressure on housing allocation in national planning policy, the majority of Kent’s Local Plans still do not include protection for Local Wildlife Sites in policy wording. In addition to training sessions, Kent Wildlife Trust has worked closely with Kent Nature Partnership to provide support specific to planning staff at each of the local authorities to demonstrate how wildlife sites and networks can be incorporated into planning policy. The emphasis placed on development in planning grows ever stronger. Kent Wildlife Trust is successfully getting a mention of wildlife in planning decisions as grounds for a refusal or conditions set for wildlife protection. The planning team has reviewed 422 planning applications in 2017, commenting on 108 and submitting objections to 52. Kent Wildlife Trust continues to gather survey data to support designation and appropriate management of Marine Conservation Zones and their protected features. There were 13 Shoresearch and 14 Seasearch (dive) activities in 2017. We have had input to discussions and consultations on management of fisheries in Margate and Long Sands Special Area for Conservation (SAC). We also responded to consultations on extensions to existing Special Protected Areas (SPAs). We have worked with developers and regulators on proposals which could damage existing or recommended Marine Protected Areas. The Living Landscapes team continue to deliver highly successful landscape scale projects. This includes our participation in the Making a Buzz project led by Bumblebee Conservation Trust where we are leading projects to deliver 15 new road verges in management for rare bees in North Kent. 2 Maintain the land and sea that we already manage and influence In 2017 we influenced the management and protection of 1,924ha of new land and 97,128ha of sea, once again significantly exceeding our annual target. Kent Wildlife Trust owned and managed 69 nature reserves, a combined land area of 3,327 ha
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catchment Partnerships in Operation
    Catchment Partnerships in Operation 100 80 53 81 89 25 90 17 74 26 67 33 71 39 16 99 28 99 56 95 2 3 20 30 37 18 42 42 85 29 79 79 15 43 91 96 21 83 38 50 61 69 51 51 59 92 62 6 73 97 45 55 75 7 88 24 98 8 82 60 10 84 12 9 57 87 77 35 66 66 78 40 5 32 78 49 35 14 34 49 41 70 94 44 27 76 58 63 1 48 23 4 13 22 19 46 72 31 47 64 93 Legend Category No group yet established 0 20 40 80 Kilometres GSurobu cpa/gtcrhomupesn wt orking at sub catchment scale WGrhooulpe wcaotrckhinmge antt whole catchment scale © Crown Copyright and database right 2013. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Map produced October 2013 © Copyright Environment Agency and database right 2013. Key to Management Catchment ID Catchment Sub/whole Joint ID Management Catchment partnership catchment Sub catchment name RBD Category Host Organisation (s) 1 Adur & Ouse Yes Whole South East England Yes Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust, Environment Agency 2 Aire and Calder Yes Whole Humber England No The Aire Rivers Trust 3 Alt/Crossens Yes Whole North West England No Healthy Waterways Trust 4 Arun & Western Streams Yes Whole South East England No Arun and Rother Rivers Trust 5 Bristol Avon & North Somerset Streams Yes Whole Severn England Yes Avon Wildlife Trust, Avon Frome Partnership 6 Broadland Rivers Yes Whole Anglian England No Norfolk Rivers Trust 7 Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level) Yes Whole Anglian England Yes The Rivers Trust, Anglian Water Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife 8 Cherwell Yes Whole Thames England No Trust 9 Colne Yes Whole Thames England
    [Show full text]
  • Swale’S Coast
    The Kent Coast Coastal Access Report This document is part of a larger document produced by Kent Area of the Ramblers’ Association and should not be read or interpreted except as part of that larger document. In particular every part of the document should be read in conjunction with the notes in the Introduction. In no circumstances may any part of this document be downloaded or distributed without all the other parts. Swale’s Coast 4.4 Swale’s Coast 4.4.1 Description 4.4.1.1 Sw ale’s coast starts at TQ828671 at Otterham Quay. It extends for 115 km to TR056650 on Graveney Marshes to the w est of The Sportsman pub. It takes in the Isle of Sheppey w hich is connected to the mainland by tw o bridges at Sw ale. It is the longest coastline in Kent. 4.4.1.2 Approximately 55 km is on PRoWs, 27 km is de facto access (though some is difficult walking) and 33 km is inaccessible to w alkers. The majority of the 27 km of inaccessible coast does not appear to be excepted land. From the Coastal Access aspect it is the most complicated coastline in Kent. Part of the mainland route is along the Saxon Shore Way. 4.4.1.3 The view to seaw ard at the start is over the Medw ay estuary. There are extensive saltings and several uninhabited islands. The route then follows the River Sw ale to Sheppey and back to the Medw ay Estuary. The north and east coasts of Sheppey look out to the Thames Estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Highsted Park, Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne, Kent
    Quinn Estates Highsted Park, Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne, Kent Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report January 2021 Highsted Park, Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne, Kent Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Revision Date Notes Author Checked Approved 2.0 20-01-21 E2165 Various Alison Banks Dr Nick Davey 2.1 07-02-21 E2165 Various Alison Banks Dr Nick Davey Entran Limited 7 Greenway Farm Bath Road Wick Bristol BS30 5RL T: 0117 937 4077 www.entranltd.co.uk ii CONTENTS PAGE 1 Introduction 1 2 Site Description 4 3 Proposed Development 6 4 ES Methodology 6 5 Key Issues to be Addressed by the EIA 10 6 Air Quality 11 7 Noise and Vibration 13 8 Landscape and Visual Impacts 16 9 Water Quality, Hydrology and Flood Risk 34 10 Archaeology and Heritage assets 36 12 Built Heritage 39 13 Ecology and Nature Conservation 45 14 Soils, Geology, Contaminated Land and Waste 50 15 Transportation 53 16 Socio-Economics, PopuLation and Human Health 55 17 Climate Change 57 18 Environmental Topics Scoped Out of the EIA 59 19 Conclusions 60 Appendix A - Proposed Visual Assessment Photograph Locations Appendix B - Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology i 1 INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 Quinn Estates Kent Limited (hereafter known as ‘the Applicant’) is seeking to obtain planning permission for a mixed-use development, including new infrastructure to create new junctions onto the M2 and A2 joined by a new relief road, at land to the south and east of Sittingbourne. This forms the southern part of the wider Highsted Park Proposed Development for which a separate Environmental Statement Scoping request has been submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the Kent Wildlife Trust Lottery and Win for Wildlife
    Join the Kent Wildlife Trust Lottery and Win for Wildlife Please return your completed form to: Membership, Kent Wildlife Trust, Tyland Barn, Sandling, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 3BD. We’ll write to you within 14 days to confirm your entry. Title Forenames Surname D.O.B. Address Postcode Telephone Email I am also happy to be contacted by Kent Wildlife Trust about their conservation, events, membership, fundraising and other activities by (please tick all that apply): Post Telephone Email Your details will be used for Kent Wildlife Trust’s purposes only and will not be sold or passed onto any other organisations. How many entries would you like each month? (please tick one box) 1 Entry per month (£2) 2 Entries per month (£4) 3 Entries per month (£6) 4 Entries per month (£8) 5 Entries per month (£10) 10 Entries per month (£20) Other amount of entries: Entries per month total £ Instruction to your Bank or Building Society to pay by Direct Debit Name and full postal address of your Bank or Building Society To: The Manager Bank/ Building Society Address Service user number 6 2 4 1 8 7 Postcode Reference L O T Name(s) of Account Holder(s) Instruction to Bank or Building Society Please pay Kent Wildlife Trust Direct Debits from the account detailed in this instruction subject to the safeguards assured by Account Number the Direct Debit Guarantee. I understand that this instruction may remain with Kent Wildlife Trust and, if so, details will be passed electronically to my Bank/Buildling Society. Sort Code Signature(s) Date Banks and Building Societies may not accept Direct Debit Instructions for some types of account.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Management of Small Pastures (Pdf)
    01 Kent Wildlife Trust Land Management Advice Series Management of Small Pastures This sheet includes information about the following topics: ● importance of pastures for wildlife ● types of grassland ● why graze? ● livestock and finding a grazier ● increasing the botanical diversity Cowden Pound Pastures: the large anthills indicate that the field has not been of your pasture ploughed or harrowed for several decades © Kent Wildlife Trust ● what time of year is best for This leaflet is designed to give owners ● semi-improved grassland contains a grazing? of small pastures some general wider array of species, typically between ● scrub recommendations on how to manage 8 to 15 per square metre ● other habitats in your pasture their land and assumes that the primary ● species-rich grassland contains over objective is to manage the land for 15 species per square metre. In Kent, ● dealing with ragwort and other nature conservation purposes. there are several different types of problem plants species-rich grassland: acid grassland, As part of the wider farmed landscape, ● references and further reading pastures have their part to play in neutral grassland and chalk grassland providing habitat for a range of species. (see Further reading). These types of ● further advice They can provide nesting sites for grassland can include over 40 species birds such as skylarks, a source of per square metre. invertebrates on which birds can feed Traditionally managed, wildflower-rich their chicks, cover for brown hares and grasslands have declined by 97% in habitat for over-wintering invertebrates. the last few decades, mainly as a result Pastures which are botanically diverse of agricultural intensification through (‘species-rich grassland’) can provide a more efficient farming techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRYSIDE Page 1 of 16
    Page 1 of 16 COUNTRYSIDE Introduction 12.1 Shepway has a rich and diverse landscape ranging from the rolling chalk downland and dry valleys of the North Downs, through the scarp and dip slope of the Old Romney Shoreline, to Romney Marsh and the unique shingle feature of the Dungeness peninsula. This diversity is reflected in the range of Natural Areas and Countryside Character Areas, identified by English Nature and the Countryside Agency respectively, which cover the District. The particular landscape and wildlife value of large parts of the District is also recognised through protective countryside designations, including Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Heritage Coastline, as well as the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The countryside also plays host to a wide range of activities and it is recognised that the health of the rural economy and the health of the countryside are inter-linked. A function of the Local Plan is to achieve a sustainable pattern of development in the countryside. This involves a balance between the needs of rural land users and maintaining and enhancing countryside character and quality. 12.2 This balance is achieved in two main ways:- a. By focussing most development in urban areas, particularly on previously developed sites and ensuring that sufficient land is allocated to meet identified development requirements, thus reducing uncertainty and speculation on ‘greenfield’ sites in the countryside. b. By making firm policy statements relating to: the general principles to be applied to all proposals in the countryside; specific types of development in the countryside; and the protection of particularly important areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report
    EB 08.20 Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report Elham Park Wood Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 1 Contents 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 2. Components of GI 3. Functions and benefits of GI 4. GI policy context 5. The GI resource in Shepway 6. Biodiversity GI in Shepway 7. Linear Feature GI 8. Civic Amenity GI 9. Key issues and opportunities in relation to strategic development sites Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 2 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 1.1 A number of definitions of Green Infrastructure (GI) are in use including:- PPS12 – “…a network of multi-functional green space, both new and existing, both rural and urban, which supports the natural and ecological processes and is integral to the health and quality of life of sustainable communities.” 1.2 South East Plan/South East GI Partnership – “For the purposes of spatial planning the term green infrastructure (GI) relates to the active planning and management of sub-regional networks of multi-functional open space. These networks should be managed and designed to support biodiversity and wider quality of life, particularly in areas undergoing large scale change.“ 1.3 Natural England – “Green Infrastructure (GI) is a strategically planned and delivered network of high quality green spaces and other environmental features. It should be designed and managed as a multifunctional resource capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities. Green Infrastructure includes parks, open spaces, playing fields, woodlands, allotments and private gardens.” 1.4 The common features of these definitions are that GI:- • involves natural and managed green areas in urban and rural settings • is about the strategic connection of open green areas • should provide multiple benefits for people 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation to Climate Change Sustainable Local Economies Abundant Wildlife Healthy Cities and Green Space for All
    A living landscape A call to restore the UK’s battered ecosystems, for wildlife and people Adaptation to climate change Sustainable local economies Abundant wildlife Healthy cities and green space for all Updated with 100+ Living Landscape schemes So much of the UK now is packed with development Fenton/BBC Beatrice and wildlife is in retreat. There are many fine nature A LIVING LANDSCAPE reserves but our future must be to integrate human and natural communities and restore a better balance. This document lays out exciting and important new plans. Professor Aubrey Manning OBE President of The Wildlife Trusts Matthew Roberts. Cover picture: St Ives and the river Great Ouse, Cambridgshire, Dae Sasitorn/lastrefuge.co.uk Dae Cambridgshire, Ouse, Great river the and Ives St picture: Cover Roberts. Matthew Where will our water come from? When will our land use become truly sustainable? How can our environment adapt to climate change? What would it take to rebuild a wildlife-rich countryside? Why are so many people disconnected from nature? Priestcliffe Lees nature reserve, owned by Derbyshire Wildlife Trust: a treasure chest of local biodiversity. The Wildlife Trusts see such places as nodes from It’s time to think big which plants and animals can recolonise a recovering landscape To adapt to climate change, the UK’s wildlife will need to move Driven by local people and aspirations, The Wildlife Trusts play along ‘climate corridors’ up and down the country, or to shadier a leading role not just in developing the vision but in mustering slopes or cooler valleys. Wildlife has done it all before, after the the support that can allow communities to drive their own last ice age, but this time the change is faster and there are change.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Ragwort, Thistles and Other Problem Plants
    06 Kent Wildlife Trust Land Management Advice Series Control of ragwort, thistles and other problem plants Generally speaking, the more reptiles and nesting habitat for birds. By biodiversity there is on a site, the better. using chemical control methods, you run the This advice sheet contains However, there are undoubtedly some risk of destroying other non-invasive species information about the following species which can become invasive which are from the same family. Ragwort topics: if left unchecked. This advice sheet and thistles are both part of the Asteraceae ● conservation benefits of ‘weeds’ explains the conservation benefits (Daisy) family and no selective herbicide of injurious weed species and other will exclusively target these few species ● weeds and the law species such as bramble and nettles; and leave all the other species of thistle, ● how to prevent weeds from taking the legislation surrounding injurious mayweed, fleabane, knapweed, hawkweed hold in the first place weed species; some steps you can and daisy unharmed. ● control of ragwort, docks and take to prevent them from becoming nettles, thistles, sycamore, bramble a problem in the first place; and some Weeds and the law and dogwood, snowberry, rushes, methods of control. There is no such thing as a ‘notifiable’ weed and it is not illegal to have plants bracken Conservation benefits of such as creeping thistle growing on your ● a note on the benefits of ivy land. However, five species are classified these species ● as injurious weeds under the Weeds Act using herbicides on your site It is important to remember that these 1959: common ragwort (Senecio jacobaea), ● ‘weed’ species have evolved over millions of references and further reading creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense), spear years and play a part in the lifecycle of many ● further advice thistle (Cirsium vulgare), curled dock (Rumex animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Sites Booklet
    Discover Discover WILD SITESon your doorstep A visitor’s guide to wildlife sites in the Stour Valley WILD SITES on your doorstep on your About WILD SITES The Kentish Stour Explore the on your doorstep Countryside Partnership WILD SITES This booklet is designed to help you The Kentish Stour Countryside Partnership Get out there! explore and enjoy the fantastic (KSCP) organised the Wild Sites project. There are so many landscapes and special wildlife of the amazing places to The KSCP works to conserve, enhance and promote the enjoy nature and the outdoors in Stour Valley. countryside and urban green space of the Stour Valley. the Stour Valley! The Wild Sites are We work closely with landowners and communities to spread all over the KSCP Partnership To get the best out of your visit, go to our conserve and protect the landscapes, habitats and area (see map). They are very varied, website: www.wildsites.org and click wildlife of our Partnership area. We conserve and ranging in size from a few acres to ‘Explore Sites’ for full details of the sites. enhance all sorts of habitats, including the River Stour hundreds of hectares, from local and other watercourses, woodlands and wildlife rich parks to internationally important Much of the content in this guide book has been grasslands; we also create habitats for wildlife in urban nature reserves, owned and managed produced by participants in the Wild Sites on Your areas. Where we can, we develop opportunities for good by a range of bodies (see back cover). Doorstep project. Hundreds of people took part in access to the countryside and informal recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitstable to Nagden England Coast Path: Whitstable to Iwade - Natural England’S Proposals
    www.gov.uk/natural-england Chapter 1: Whitstable to Nagden England Coast Path: Whitstable to Iwade - Natural England’s Proposals Part 1.1: Introduction Start Point: Whitstable Harbour (grid reference: TR1086 6700) End Point: Nagden (grid reference: TR 0305 6328) Relevant Maps: 1a to 1g Understanding the proposals and accompanying maps: The Trail: 1.1.1 Generally follows existing walked routes, including public rights of way, along most of this length. 1.1.2 Mainly follows the coastline quite closely and maintains good views of the sea. 1.1.3 Follows a route similar to the Saxon Shore Way, a regionally promoted walking route, in the rural areas to the west. In the more urban areas of Whitstable and Seasalter, it departs from the Saxon Shore Way in order to follow the coast more closely (see Overview Map B – Existing Access: Whitstable to Iwade). 1.1.4 Is aligned on the beach between The Lower Island Golf Course, Whitstable and The Battery at Seasalter. See route sections WSI-1-S026, WSI-2-S027 and WSI-2-S029 to WSI-1-S034 on maps 1a and 1b, and table 1.2.1 below for details. 1.1.5 Includes one stretch of new path near Seasalter Levels. The route follows an inland diversion here to take the trail along the base of an inland flood defence bund south of Faversham Road, as the beach and Faversham Road are considered unsuitable for a National Trail at this location. See sections WSI-1-S039 to WSI-1-S044 on maps 1b and 1c, and table 1.2.1 below for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan
    FAVERSHAM 2020: Town Action Plan December 2012 TAP MAIN 21 FEB.indd 1 22/02/2013 15:19:59 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Contents Page Foreword by Cllr David Simmons, Mayor of Faversham 3 Executive summary and key recommendations 4 Introduction to Faversham 2020 6 About Faversham 8 A vision for Faversham 12 Interpreting the feedback 13 Topic areas 15 Recommendations matrix 33 Annex A: Methodology 49 Annex B: Bibliography 52 Annex C: 2001 vision statement 54 2 3 TAP MAIN 21 FEB.indd 2 22/02/2013 15:20:00 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Foreword by the mayor On behalf of Faversham Town Council, I am delighted to welcome the publication of Faversham 2020: the Town Action Plan. The plan builds on the Faversham 2006 Health Check and explores in detail the opportunities the localism agenda can deliver for Faversham. It has provided a voice to residents, many of whom have articulated, perhaps for the first time, their views of, and vision for, the future of Faversham for which we are extremely grateful. We also extend our thanks to Alison Eardley of Action for Market Towns and Laurence Young of the Faversham Enterprise Partnership who delivered the project supported by the Town Action Plan Steering Group. When the town council commissioned the Town Action Plan, our aim was to learn, in a more structured way, what residents wanted the town council to do and deliver on their behalf. The engagement process (details of which can be found at Annex A) has given people the opportunity to think carefully about their home town – what they like, what they don’t like, and what changes they want to see – and to make a set of recommendations for change.
    [Show full text]