Come and Join the Original KWT Green Team Group, We Have Been Going for Almost 20 Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Come and join the original KWT Green Team group, we have been going for almost 20 years. We work on a variety of sites from Sittingbourne to Sevenoaks to Staplehurst, going somewhere different every week in the KWT landrover. Does this sound like your kind of adventure? We’re lead by Steve Weeks, Medway Valley Warden, who has been working with Kent Wildlife Trust for many years, alongside some experienced and knowledgeable volunteer team leaders. We love sharing our enthusiasm and skills and welcome all levels of ability. Working on almost every habitat type in Kent, there is a huge variety to do. With this team if you hang around long enough there isn't a job you wont get the chance to be involved with! Why is it important? The Green Team are responsible for main- taining the reserves when there is no project funding to do the work. They are the glue that holds the reserves together year in, year out regardless. Without their help many of our smaller, wilder, quiet or hidden sites would Spring & Summer really struggle to hang on to their wildlife val- Construction such as fencing, boardwalks or ue. gates. Summer is weeding and surveying. Commitment: every Wednesday at various Autumn & Winter locations. Come weekly, monthly or on an ad- Winter is all about cutting stuff down and hoc basis. having a big bonfire, sometimes small Training: Full training is given and you’ll only woody regrowth of a chalk grassland, some- be asked to do work you are comfortable with. times huge coppice stools that need re- There is also the option to do further training invigorating with the full short back and in machinery or team leading too. sides. 01622 662012 | [email protected] | www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/get-involved Task locations can change at short notice so 03rd – Rob it is important to check in with the warden in 10th – Ruxley Gravel pits, path cutting advance. 17th – Holborough Marsh, ragwort 24th – Nashenden, surveys and weeding Wear old clothes, waterproofs and strong 31st – Cromers wood, paths and shoes (wellies may be needed). Bring a drink infrastructure improvements and a packed lunch if you plan to stay all day. 07th – Peter’s Pit, Fencing At Tyland barn at 9.15 for a 9.30 departure to 14th – Fackenden Down, Invasive weed site control 21st – Summer outing 28th – Kiln Wood, Wayleave clearance Keeley for further details on (01622) 357 849. 01st – Holborough Marsh, Water vole survey 08th – Kemsing Down, Injurious plant control 15th – Nashenden Down, Tree care 22nd – Workshop tidy and repair day 29th – Marden Meadows, Weed control 05th – Polhill Bank, Invasive weed control 12th – Blue Bell Hill, surveys and repairs 19th – Peters Pit, ragwort 26th – Turners Field, Path cutting .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

TIMETABLE 142 & 185.Cdr
TIMETABLE OF ALL BUSES AT DAVIS ESTATE BUS 185 Mondays to Fridays - not Bank, National or Public Holdays Nu-Venture service number 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STN STOP A7 - - 1018 1108 1158 a 1248 e 1350 1550 1705 1815 Chatham Station - - 1021 1111 1201 a 1251 e 1353 1553 1708 1818 Grosvenor Avenue - - 1024 1114 1204 a 1254 e 1356 1556 1711 1821 Wilson Avenue/Wallace Road - - 1027 1117 1207 a 1257 e 1359 1559 p - - Huntsmans Corner - - - - - - - 1559 z 1714 1824 Blue Bell Hill Village 0747 - - - - - - - - - Bridgewood Roundabout northbound 0751 - - - - - - - - - Davis Estate Vale Road 0758 0915 1030 1120 1210 a 1300 e R R R R Davis Estate opp Holland Rd Shops 0802 0920 1035 1125 1215 a 1305 e R R R R Davis Estate Shirley Ave Shops, Post Office 0806 0926 1041 1131 1221 a 1311 e R R R R Bridgewood Roundabout southbound - - - - - - - R R - Blue Bell Hill Village - - - - - - - R R - Wilson Avenue/Wallace Road - 0930 1045 1135 1225 a 1315 e - - - - Huntsmans Corner 0810 - - - - - - - - - Grosvenor Avenue 0813 0933 1048 1138 1228 a 1318 e - - - - CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STATION 0820 0939 1054 1144 1234 a 1324 e - - - - Saturdays - also work-days between Christmas and New Year Nu-Venture service number 185 185 185 185 185 185 CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STN STOP A7 - 0956 1156 1356 1550 1730 Chatham Station - 0959 1159 1359 1553 1733 Grosvenor Avenue - 1002 1202 1402 1556 1736 Huntsmans Corner - 1005 1205 1405 1559 1739 Blue Bell Hill Village 0752 - - - - - Bridgewood Roundabout northbound 0756 - - - - - Davis Estate Vale Road 0803 1008 1208 1408 R R Davis Estate opp Holland Rd Shops 0807 1013 1213 1413 R R Davis Estate Shirley Ave Shops, Post Office 0811 1019 1219 1419 R R Bridgewood Roundabout southbound - - - - R R Blue Bell Hill Village - - - - R R Huntsmans Corner 0815 1023 1223 1423 - - Grosvenor Avenue 0818 1026 1226 1426 - - CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STATION 0825 1032 1232 1432 - - NO SERVICE ON SUNDAYS, BANK, NATIONAL OR PUBLIC HOLIDAYS, OR ON 1 JANUARY, 25/26 DECEMBER.
[Show full text]
The Warren Farm Chamber: a Reconsideration
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE WARREN FARM CHAMBER: A RECONSIDERATION PAUL ASHBEE At least seven ruined but recognisable stone-chambered long barrows, Kit's Coty House being the best known, still remain in the Medway valley where that river cuts through the chalk of the North Downs. They had exceptionally high rectangular chambers, proportional facades, and stone kerbs. In plan they recall the southern English earthen long barrows, originally of timber, such as Fussell's Lodge in Wiltshire (Ashbee 1966). They are distinct from other groups and are likely to have been versions of the stone-built long barrows of Holland and Northern Germany (Ashbee 1999). The Medway's megalithic long barrows (Fig. 1), like others of their kind, were surrogate long houses (Ashbee 1999, 270) and also repositories for human remains rather than mere tombs. There may have been centuries of recourse to them, before they were finally sealed with occupation debris (Piggott 1962, 26; Woodward 1993). Their construction with sarsen stones, some of almost Stonehenge calibre, required considerable labour, while they cannot but have fulfilled a central role for the Neolithic communities of the terrain that was to become Kent. Early in 1822 the great stones of a long barrow chamber's remnant part were encountered, just within the 300ft contour, and close by Warren Farm, on Blue Bell Hill (NGR TQ 753 606). An obstruction to ploughing had led to digging which disclosed large sarsen stones just below the surface. George Fowle, of Cobtree Manor, the landowner, ordered their removal, but when three uprights emerged he determined that they should be uncovered.
[Show full text]
Well Autumn 2012 Final Copy
THE WELL Kemsing Village Magazine with news from Woodlands Autumn 2012 No 187 CONTENTS - The Well Autumn 2012 No 187 Olympics 2012 3 Life on the Hill 19 Vicar s letter 4 PCSO Adrian Fromm 21 Church Services 5 Kemsing School Report 23 Memorial to Don Eley 7 News from Cotmans Ash 25 Emergency phone numbers 9 Rainbows & Church Carpet 26 Parish Council News 11 Family Milestones 28 News & Notes and PTA News 13 Kemsing Festival Plaque 30 Chancel Repair Liability 15 St. Mary s Church Choir 30 Monty Parkin 16/17 Village Diary 31 Editorial Team:- Doreen Farrow, Janet Eaton & Rosemary Banister. We reserve the right to edit [i.e. cut, précis, alter, correct grammar or spelling] any item published, and our decision is final. Cover picture shows the Well area in Summer. Our thanks are due to the Kemsing Gardener s Society for their care and attention to this colourful area. Cover Picture by Janet Eaton COPY FOR NEXT ISSUE Please submit any items or articles for the next issue of The Well before 1st November 2012 to [email protected] THE WELL - is published and distributed free, four times a year by the Parochial Church Councils of St Mary s Church, Kemsing and St Mary s Church, Woodlands, to encourage and stimulate the life of the community. The views expressed in the magazine do not nec- essarily represent official church opinion or policy. If you use a computer to type your article, it would be extremely helpful if you could Email it to: [email protected] or send to the Editors c/o Poppies Cottage, 3, St.
[Show full text]
Catchment Partnerships in Operation
Catchment Partnerships in Operation 100 80 53 81 89 25 90 17 74 26 67 33 71 39 16 99 28 99 56 95 2 3 20 30 37 18 42 42 85 29 79 79 15 43 91 96 21 83 38 50 61 69 51 51 59 92 62 6 73 97 45 55 75 7 88 24 98 8 82 60 10 84 12 9 57 87 77 35 66 66 78 40 5 32 78 49 35 14 34 49 41 70 94 44 27 76 58 63 1 48 23 4 13 22 19 46 72 31 47 64 93 Legend Category No group yet established 0 20 40 80 Kilometres GSurobu cpa/gtcrhomupesn wt orking at sub catchment scale WGrhooulpe wcaotrckhinmge antt whole catchment scale © Crown Copyright and database right 2013. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Map produced October 2013 © Copyright Environment Agency and database right 2013. Key to Management Catchment ID Catchment Sub/whole Joint ID Management Catchment partnership catchment Sub catchment name RBD Category Host Organisation (s) 1 Adur & Ouse Yes Whole South East England Yes Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust, Environment Agency 2 Aire and Calder Yes Whole Humber England No The Aire Rivers Trust 3 Alt/Crossens Yes Whole North West England No Healthy Waterways Trust 4 Arun & Western Streams Yes Whole South East England No Arun and Rother Rivers Trust 5 Bristol Avon & North Somerset Streams Yes Whole Severn England Yes Avon Wildlife Trust, Avon Frome Partnership 6 Broadland Rivers Yes Whole Anglian England No Norfolk Rivers Trust 7 Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level) Yes Whole Anglian England Yes The Rivers Trust, Anglian Water Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife 8 Cherwell Yes Whole Thames England No Trust 9 Colne Yes Whole Thames England
[Show full text]
The Medway Megaliths and Neolithic Kent
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE MEDWAY MEGALITHS AND NEOLITHIC KENT* ROBIN HOLGATE, B.Sc. INTRODUCTION The Medway megaliths constitute a geographically well-defined group of this Neolithic site-type1 and are the only megalithic group in eastern England. Previous accounts of these monuments2 have largely been devoted to their morphology and origins; a study in- corporating current trends in British megalithic studies is therefore long overdue. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN BRITISH MEGALITHIC STUDIES Until the late 1960s, megalithic chambered barrows and cairns were considered to have functioned purely as tombs: they were the burial vaults and funerary monuments for people living in the fourth and third millennia B.C. The first academic studies of these monuments therefore concentrated on the typological analysis of their plans. This method of analysis, though, has often produced incorrect in- terpretations: without excavation it is often impossible to reconstruct the sequence of development and original appearance for a large number of megaliths. In addition, plan-typology disregards other aspects related to them, for example constructional * I am indebted to Peter Drewett for reading and commenting on a first draft of this article; naturally I take responsibility for all the views expressed. 1 G.E. Daniel, The Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of England and Wales, Cambridge, 1950, 12. 2 Daniel, op. cit; J.H. Evans, 'Kentish Megalith Types', Arch. Cant, Ixiii (1950), 63-81; R.F. Jessup, South-East England, London, 1970. 221 THE MEDWAY MEGALITHS GRAVESEND. ROCHESTER CHATHAM r>v.-5rt AYLESFORD MAIDSTONE Fig.
[Show full text]
Dave Brown by Dave Brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT
Dave Brown by dave brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT Saturday 8th May 2010. One look out of the window told me today was not the day for butterflies or dragonflies. A phone call from a friend then had us heading to my favourite place. Good old Dungeness. Scenery not the best in the world but the wildlife exceeedingly good. Thirty minutes later we were watching a Whiskered Tern hawking insects over the New Diggings, showing from the road to Lydd. Also present were a few hundred Swifts, Swallows, House and Sand Martins, together with a few Common Terns. A quick chat with Dave Walker (very friendly Observatory Warden) and his equally friendly assistant confirmed that the recent weather there meant little or no Butterfly or moth activity. With the rain falling harder it was time to leave Dunge and head inland. The Iberian Chifchaf at Waderslade had already been present over a week so it was time to catch up with it. On arrival at the small wood of Chesnut Avenue the bird showed and sang within a few minutes of our arrival. This is still a scarce bird in Britain so where was the crowd. In 30 minutes the maximum crowd was five, and that included 3 from our family. It sang for long periods of time and only once did it mutter the usual Chifchaf call, otherwise it was Iberian Chifchaf all the way. It also look slighlty diferent in structure and colour. To my eyes the upper parts were greener, the legs were a brown colour and the tail appeared longer.
[Show full text]
Biodiversity Action Plan
Biodiversity Action Plan 2015-2018 Public March 2015 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3 About Us .......................................................................................................... 3 What is biodiversity? ........................................................................................... 3 Drivers for the Biodiversity Action Plan ................................................................... 3 Focus on Special Sites of Scientific Interest (SSSIs) .................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 6 Biodiversity Achievements and Measures to Date .................................................. 7 Environmental Management System (EMS) ............................................................. 7 Partnership ....................................................................................................... 7 Operational Response at Designated Sites............................................................... 7 Waste and Recycling Sites.................................................................................... 8 Procurement ..................................................................................................... 9 Estate Management ............................................................................................ 9 New Builds and Major Refurbishments ................................................................
[Show full text]
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) Within the Borough
LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION REPORT DECEMBER 2016 Table of contents Bexley sites of importance for nature conservation PART I. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 Purpose and format of this document ................................................................................ 5 Bexley context ................................................................................................................... 5 What is biodiversity? ......................................................................................................... 6 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) ....................................................... 6 Strategic green wildlife corridors ....................................................................................... 8 Why has London Borough of Bexley adopted a new SINC assessment? ........................ 10 PART II. Site-by-site review ......................................................................................... 12 Sites of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation ....................................... 13 M015 Lesnes Abbey Woods and Bostall Woods ........................................................... 13 M031 the River Thames and tidal tributaries ................................................................. 15 M041 Erith Marshes ...................................................................................................... 19 M105
[Show full text]
Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
[Show full text]
Highsted Park, Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne, Kent
Quinn Estates Highsted Park, Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne, Kent Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report January 2021 Highsted Park, Land to the South and East of Sittingbourne, Kent Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Revision Date Notes Author Checked Approved 2.0 20-01-21 E2165 Various Alison Banks Dr Nick Davey 2.1 07-02-21 E2165 Various Alison Banks Dr Nick Davey Entran Limited 7 Greenway Farm Bath Road Wick Bristol BS30 5RL T: 0117 937 4077 www.entranltd.co.uk ii CONTENTS PAGE 1 Introduction 1 2 Site Description 4 3 Proposed Development 6 4 ES Methodology 6 5 Key Issues to be Addressed by the EIA 10 6 Air Quality 11 7 Noise and Vibration 13 8 Landscape and Visual Impacts 16 9 Water Quality, Hydrology and Flood Risk 34 10 Archaeology and Heritage assets 36 12 Built Heritage 39 13 Ecology and Nature Conservation 45 14 Soils, Geology, Contaminated Land and Waste 50 15 Transportation 53 16 Socio-Economics, PopuLation and Human Health 55 17 Climate Change 57 18 Environmental Topics Scoped Out of the EIA 59 19 Conclusions 60 Appendix A - Proposed Visual Assessment Photograph Locations Appendix B - Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology i 1 INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 Quinn Estates Kent Limited (hereafter known as ‘the Applicant’) is seeking to obtain planning permission for a mixed-use development, including new infrastructure to create new junctions onto the M2 and A2 joined by a new relief road, at land to the south and east of Sittingbourne. This forms the southern part of the wider Highsted Park Proposed Development for which a separate Environmental Statement Scoping request has been submitted.
[Show full text]
Join the Kent Wildlife Trust Lottery and Win for Wildlife
Join the Kent Wildlife Trust Lottery and Win for Wildlife Please return your completed form to: Membership, Kent Wildlife Trust, Tyland Barn, Sandling, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 3BD. We’ll write to you within 14 days to confirm your entry. Title Forenames Surname D.O.B. Address Postcode Telephone Email I am also happy to be contacted by Kent Wildlife Trust about their conservation, events, membership, fundraising and other activities by (please tick all that apply): Post Telephone Email Your details will be used for Kent Wildlife Trust’s purposes only and will not be sold or passed onto any other organisations. How many entries would you like each month? (please tick one box) 1 Entry per month (£2) 2 Entries per month (£4) 3 Entries per month (£6) 4 Entries per month (£8) 5 Entries per month (£10) 10 Entries per month (£20) Other amount of entries: Entries per month total £ Instruction to your Bank or Building Society to pay by Direct Debit Name and full postal address of your Bank or Building Society To: The Manager Bank/ Building Society Address Service user number 6 2 4 1 8 7 Postcode Reference L O T Name(s) of Account Holder(s) Instruction to Bank or Building Society Please pay Kent Wildlife Trust Direct Debits from the account detailed in this instruction subject to the safeguards assured by Account Number the Direct Debit Guarantee. I understand that this instruction may remain with Kent Wildlife Trust and, if so, details will be passed electronically to my Bank/Buildling Society. Sort Code Signature(s) Date Banks and Building Societies may not accept Direct Debit Instructions for some types of account.
[Show full text]
Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report
EB 08.20 Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report Elham Park Wood Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 1 Contents 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 2. Components of GI 3. Functions and benefits of GI 4. GI policy context 5. The GI resource in Shepway 6. Biodiversity GI in Shepway 7. Linear Feature GI 8. Civic Amenity GI 9. Key issues and opportunities in relation to strategic development sites Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 2 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 1.1 A number of definitions of Green Infrastructure (GI) are in use including:- PPS12 – “…a network of multi-functional green space, both new and existing, both rural and urban, which supports the natural and ecological processes and is integral to the health and quality of life of sustainable communities.” 1.2 South East Plan/South East GI Partnership – “For the purposes of spatial planning the term green infrastructure (GI) relates to the active planning and management of sub-regional networks of multi-functional open space. These networks should be managed and designed to support biodiversity and wider quality of life, particularly in areas undergoing large scale change.“ 1.3 Natural England – “Green Infrastructure (GI) is a strategically planned and delivered network of high quality green spaces and other environmental features. It should be designed and managed as a multifunctional resource capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities. Green Infrastructure includes parks, open spaces, playing fields, woodlands, allotments and private gardens.” 1.4 The common features of these definitions are that GI:- • involves natural and managed green areas in urban and rural settings • is about the strategic connection of open green areas • should provide multiple benefits for people 2.
[Show full text]