DOCSLIB.ORG

Recording Wildlife: Getting Started

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recording Wildlife: Getting Started 11 Kent Wildlife Trust Land Management Advice Series Recording wildlife: getting started This advice sheet contains information about the following topics: ● why record wildlife sightings? ● where you should send your records ● what information do you need to record ● recording on a particular site Identifying wildflowers, Cherishing Churchyards Day, St Peter ● running your own BioBlitz and St Paul’s Church, Tonbridge © Kent wildlife Trust ● WildWalks Observing nature can be a wonderful ● the presence or absence of certain ● improving your identification skills pastime and can also help us to species (known as ‘indicator species’) can understand how best to manage our tell us a lot about the health of the local ● further advice and requests for local wildlife areas. However, many habitat surveys people feel a bit daunted about trying ● ● further reading and references to record wildlife and getting to grips many species have declined in the with species identification. This leaflet past few decades, mainly as a result has been designed to give some initial of agricultural intensification and urban suggestions on how to get started. development. The reason we know this Unless otherwise stated, the contact is because there are records to show that details for all the organisations these species used to be more numerous mentioned in this leaflet are listed in in the past. The absence of records for a the Kent Wildlife Trust List of Contact species can tell us almost as much about Details for Conservation Organisations. the current status of a species as the presence of records. ● there simply are not enough experts in Why record wildlife Kent to get out there and record across sightings? the county regularly – we need more people to become involved There are many reasons why it is important to record wildlife sightings: ● recording wildlife can be a wonderful experience for people of all ages! It is ● it is difficult to know how best to manage never too late to start, it doesn’t cost a site unless one has some idea as to anything, and you can do it on your own what wildlife is already present or choose to make it into a social occasion. ● robust scientific data is needed in order You can even let the whole world know Trust volunteers doing a water vole survey at Holborough Marsh © D. Watson to inform legislation regarding wildlife about it through Facebook! Large print version available by calling 01622 662012 Your living landscape. Your living seas. The Trust’s Conservation team outing – practising identification skills © Kent Wildlife Trust Ragged robin © R.I.Moyse Where you should send it is male or female or a juvenile, what your records stage of the lifecycle (caterpillar?), what condition the animal or plant was in Biggle community If you would like to share your records more (singing on a perch to indicate its territory, widely, then please send them to the Kent nature reserve, dead by the side of the road) and Medway Biological Record Centre. In Biggle, Kent ● how many: ideally, this needs to be as order for the staff and volunteers to input data Central Grid Ref: TQ636545 more easily, some simple guidelines need to precise as possible. If you are recording be followed, including using a spreadsheet something like spawn, then numbers of Janet Ginger, 6 Mayfield and giving a grid reference. Please go to the clumps of spawn will do! Crescent, Rochester. ‘Recording’ tab on their website to find out ● where: the name of the site or street more. name, and some notes about the site e.g. 21st April 2012 garden, industrial site. You will also need Front field (GR: TQ 635555) Kent & Medway Biological Records Centre to give a postcode (if in your garden) or (KMBRC) a grid reference if the record was taken 2 song thrushes Brogdale Farm Office, Brogdale Farm, out in the wider countryside (the KMBRC (one singing on top of birch tree) Brogdale Road, Faversham, Kent ME13 8XZ. website tells you how to find a grid Email: [email protected] reference – see left for details). 5 goldfinches Tel: 01795 532385 Fax: 01795 532386 ● when: date, month and year 1 blackbird carrying nesting http://www.kmbrc.org.uk/ If you are not sure of your identification, material What information do you why not sketch the plant or animal or take Woodland/stream area need to record? a photo and then check later, when you get back home. You can always send the photo (GR: TQ636550) ● who: you, the recorder, and preferably to the KMBRC or to the Trust and we will a contact number or address in case 1 adult common toad do our best to identify it. of any queries 1 speckled wood butterfly ● what: the species and, if possible, whether 3rd June 2012 Soft shield fern © Kent Wildlife Trust Woodland/stream area Blackcap singing Checked all mats - no slow worms or anything! Some fly-tipping - need to ask Jack to organise task here. Children carrying out a survey © London Wildlife Trust Southern hawker © J.Shorter Holly blue © T.Connor Recording on a expertise in some species groups, then ask Trusts in partnership with the British Trust for particular site them to help you. Ornithology, as an online wildlife recording tool. We want to encourage the public, If you are trying to build up a set of ● if you have a large site and/or more time whether expert recorders or those with less records for a particular site such as a to record, then have a look at the Field expertise, to get out and explore our nature churchyard, garden or school grounds, Surveying Techniques on the KMBRC reserves and Living Landscapes areas such maybe just out of interest or because website to look at alternative methods of as the Medway Smile, the Darent Triangle it will help to inform management recording such as transects or Sevenoaks Living Landscape (SOLL) in an plans for the site, then we suggest the effort to help us map nature as it changes. following: Running your own BioBlitz One way of rapidly finding out about the Through WildWalks, users will be able to ● collate all the current records for the wildlife present on your site is to organise a record wildlife sightings against designated site (you may need to spend some BioBlitz, which is a quick one day/24 hour bout walks which can be created by users or time deciphering old paper records), of intense recording, of any species found, selected from recommended walks produced preferably onto a spreadsheet on a with as many people recording as possible by Kent Wildlife Trust. The areas we are computer (all abilities welcome, experts and beginners asking people to walk in and record wildlife ● think about what time you have to alike). The Bristol Natural History Consortium are places where the Trust is targeting spend on recording: one visit a week? provides good information on how to organise landscape conservation efforts working with once a month? systematic recording successful events, with hints and tips, partners to try and secure nature’s recovery. or ad hoc? are other people recording resources and examples of past BioBlitzes. If you are interested in using these recording on the site too? For further details about the National BioBlitz tools to help us map the impact of our Network, please go to http://www.bnhc.org. ● if you have little time, then a simple conservation work more information can be uk/home/bioblitz/ list of species seen, with a date and found at www.livingmap.org.uk or via links a note on specific location within the WildWalks - help us map on living landscape pages of the Kent Wildlife site, should be enough. This can help the impact of our landscape Trust website. to inform any management as well, conservation work such as where to cut the grass and The Wildlife Trusts have recently launched what time of year. As the records WildWalks, an online recording system build up, think about what species allowing members of the public to map groups are not being recorded records of plants and animals across their local (lichens, invertebrates other than Living Landscape projects. The objective is to butterflies, small mammals and bats develop a better understanding of the impact are often problematic) and how you of our landscape conservation work and to will try to find out more about those give people the opportunity to help with this. groups (see KMBRC webpage on Field Survey Techniques). If there WildWalks has been developed through the BioBlitz with Canterbury University at Darland Banks © Canterbury Christchurch University are any local people who might have LivingMap project, established by The Wildlife Improving your ● other conservation organisations in Kent Requests for surveys also tend to organise courses every year, so identification skills If you would like more information about it is worth checking their websites regularly. Useful websites: our professional services, such as habitat ● the Field Studies Council (FSC) has a or species surveys, ecological scoping ● Buglife national programme of courses for families surveys or Ecological Impact Assessments, ● Bumblebee Conservation Trust and individuals. Courses are run at different then please do get in touch with Kent ● Butterfly Conservation levels and at many centres throughout the Wildlife Trust. There is usually a charge for ● Kent Bat Group country. For further details, please contact these services, although we can sometimes ● Kent Mammal Group the Field Studies Council by calling 01743 access funding to help cover the costs. 852100 or emailing enquiries@field-studies- If we cannot help, we will do our best to ● KMBRC (McClintock library) council.org or visiting their website www.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Direct and Indirect Contribution Made by the Wildlife Trusts to the Health and Wellbeing of Local People
    An independent assessment for The Wildlife Trusts: by the University of Essex The direct and indirect contribution made by The Wildlife Trusts to the health and wellbeing of local people Protecting Wildlife for the Future Dr Carly Wood, Dr Mike Rogerson*, Dr Rachel Bragg, Dr Jo Barton and Professor Jules Pretty School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex Acknowledgments The authors are very grateful for the help and support given by The Wildlife Trusts staff, notably Nigel Doar, Cally Keetley and William George. All photos are courtesy of various Wildlife Trusts and are credited accordingly. Front Cover Photo credits: © Matthew Roberts Back Cover Photo credits: Small Copper Butterfly © Bob Coyle. * Correspondence contact: Mike Rogerson, Research Officer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ. [email protected] The direct and indirect contribution made by individual Wildlife Trusts on the health and wellbeing of local people Report for The Wildlife Trusts Carly Wood, Mike Rogerson*, Rachel Bragg, Jo Barton, Jules Pretty Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Background to research 8 1.2 The role of the Wildlife Trusts in promoting health and wellbeing 8 1.3 The role of the Green Exercise Research Team 9 1.4 The impact of nature on health and wellbeing 10 1.5 Nature-based activities for the general public and Green Care interventions for vulnerable people 11 1.6 Aim and objectives of this research 14 1.7 Content and structure of this report 15 2. Methodology 16 2.1 Survey of current nature-based activities run by individual Wildlife Trusts and Wildlife Trusts’ perceptions of evaluating health and wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaces Wild, London Wildlife Trust
    SPACES WILD championing the values of London’s wildlife sites Protecting London’s wildlife for the future Foreword London is a remarkably green city supporting a wide diversity of habitats and species. Almost half of its area is blue and green space, and almost a fifth – covering over 1,500 different sites - is of sufficient value to biodiversity to be identified worthy of protection. These wildlife sites consist of much more than nature reserves, ranging from wetlands to chalk downs that are often valued by the local community for uses other than habitat. They have been established for almost 30 years, and as a network they provide the foundations for the conservation and enhancement of London’s wildlife, and the opportunity for people to experience the diversity of the city’s nature close to hand. They are a fantastic asset, but awareness of wildlife sites – the Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) – is low amongst the public (compared to, say, the Green Belt). There is understandable confusion between statutory wildlife sites and those identified through London’s planning process. In addition the reasons why SINCs have been identified SINCs cover 19.3% of the are often difficult to find out. With London set to grow to 10 million people by 2030 the pressures on our wildlife Greater London area sites will become profound. I have heard of local authorities being forced to choose between saving a local park and building a school. Accommodating our growth without causing a decline in the quality of our natural assets will be challenging; we have a target to build an estimated 42,000 homes a year in the capital merely to keep up with demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31St March 2020
    Company no 1600379 Charity no 283895 LONDON WILDLIFE TRUST (A Company Limited by Guarantee) Report and Financial Statements For the year ended 31st March 2020 CONTENTS Pages Trustees’ Report 2-9 Reference and Administrative Details 10 Independent Auditor's Report 11-13 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 14 Consolidated and Charity Balance sheets 15 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 16 Notes to the accounts 17-32 1 London Wildlife Trust Trustees’ report For the year ended 31st March 2020 The Board of Trustees of London Wildlife Trust present their report together with the audited accounts for the year ended 31 March 2020. The Board have adopted the provisions of the Charities SORP (FRS 102) – Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended practice applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (effective 1 January 2015) in preparing the annual report and financial statements of the charity. The accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Our objectives London Wildlife Trust Limited is required by charity and company law to act within the objects of its Articles of Association, which are as follows: 1. To promote the conservation, creation, maintenance and study for the benefit of the public of places and objects of biological, geological, archaeological or other scientific interest or of natural beauty in Greater London and elsewhere and to promote biodiversity throughout Greater London. 2. To promote the education of the public and in particular young people in the principles and practice of conservation of flora and fauna, the principles of sustainability and the appreciation of natural beauty particularly in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woodlander
    Autumn at Sydenham Hill Wood (DG) In this issue: Open Day blockbuster Volunteers clean up mess Wildlife sightings The Crystal Palace High Level railway And winter bird walk Contact: [email protected] 0207 252 9186 Twitter Facebook Protecting London’s wildlife for the future Registered Charity Number: 283895 Follow London Wildlife Trust on Twitter and Facebook Sydenham Hill Wood News Volunteers clean up after double arson attack After suffering a double arson attack on our fencing storage at Sydenham Hill Wood in August, it was left to volunteers from the local community to clean up the debris and piles of charcoal. It is not unusual to have to deal with minor incidents of vandalism and attempts to damage fencing, sometimes with fire, but this was nd different. The first arson attack took place on Saturday 2 August and the second on the following Monday. The fire brigade was called in to put out both fires. Thank you to the London Fire Service for all their work in doing so. One of the main concerns, apart from damage to property and equipment was the protection of bats which use the tunnel to roost and hibernate. We know that bats swarm in the tunnel in summer but they are unlikely to have been harmed as the tunnel has another point of exit for bats on the southern, Lewisham end. In September Southwark Council covered the damaged façade with steel sheeting to stop anyone gaining unlawful access to the tunnel in future. The tunnel was built in the 1860s as part of the Crystal Palace High Level railway but closed in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Partnerships in Operation
    Catchment Partnerships in Operation 100 80 53 81 89 25 90 17 74 26 67 33 71 39 16 99 28 99 56 95 2 3 20 30 37 18 42 42 85 29 79 79 15 43 91 96 21 83 38 50 61 69 51 51 59 92 62 6 73 97 45 55 75 7 88 24 98 8 82 60 10 84 12 9 57 87 77 35 66 66 78 40 5 32 78 49 35 14 34 49 41 70 94 44 27 76 58 63 1 48 23 4 13 22 19 46 72 31 47 64 93 Legend Category No group yet established 0 20 40 80 Kilometres GSurobu cpa/gtcrhomupesn wt orking at sub catchment scale WGrhooulpe wcaotrckhinmge antt whole catchment scale © Crown Copyright and database right 2013. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Map produced October 2013 © Copyright Environment Agency and database right 2013. Key to Management Catchment ID Catchment Sub/whole Joint ID Management Catchment partnership catchment Sub catchment name RBD Category Host Organisation (s) 1 Adur & Ouse Yes Whole South East England Yes Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust, Environment Agency 2 Aire and Calder Yes Whole Humber England No The Aire Rivers Trust 3 Alt/Crossens Yes Whole North West England No Healthy Waterways Trust 4 Arun & Western Streams Yes Whole South East England No Arun and Rother Rivers Trust 5 Bristol Avon & North Somerset Streams Yes Whole Severn England Yes Avon Wildlife Trust, Avon Frome Partnership 6 Broadland Rivers Yes Whole Anglian England No Norfolk Rivers Trust 7 Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level) Yes Whole Anglian England Yes The Rivers Trust, Anglian Water Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife 8 Cherwell Yes Whole Thames England No Trust 9 Colne Yes Whole Thames England
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Nature Recovery Network to Bring Back Wildlife to Every Neighbourhood
    Towards A Wilder Britain Creating a Nature Recovery Network to bring back wildlife to every neighbourhood A report for the Westminster Government by The Wildlife Trusts Nature Recovery Network We all The common lizard used to live up to its name. It could need nature do again It’s time to give it the space it needs to be part of all our lives Contents t a time when Britain stands 4 Britain in 2040 on the brink of its biggest It could be healthier, happier and greener – if we take A ever shake-up of the right decisions now environmental rules, The Wildlife Trusts are calling for a wilder, better 6 Britain in 2018 Britain. A lack of joined-up thinking has produced a raft of Most people agree that wildlife social and environmental problems and wild places are valuable for their own sake. We now know from 8 The solution: a Nature Recovery Network research across the globe that a Local networks of places that are good for wildlife, joined healthy, wildlife-rich natural world is together into a national Nature Recovery Network essential for our wellbeing and prosperity. 12 How the network can become reality But wildlife has been getting less A combination of strong new laws, nature maps and a and less common, on land and at change in our national culture to value nature once more sea, for decades. Wild places are The Wildlife Trusts more scarce, smaller and more 14 Pioneer project: the Aire Valley, Yorkshire Tel: 01636 670000 isolated. There is less nature and How a Nature Recovery Network would strengthen the local economy Email: [email protected] Website: wildlifetrusts.org greenery in the places where we @WildlifeTrusts live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the Kent Wildlife Trust Lottery and Win for Wildlife
    Join the Kent Wildlife Trust Lottery and Win for Wildlife Please return your completed form to: Membership, Kent Wildlife Trust, Tyland Barn, Sandling, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 3BD. We’ll write to you within 14 days to confirm your entry. Title Forenames Surname D.O.B. Address Postcode Telephone Email I am also happy to be contacted by Kent Wildlife Trust about their conservation, events, membership, fundraising and other activities by (please tick all that apply): Post Telephone Email Your details will be used for Kent Wildlife Trust’s purposes only and will not be sold or passed onto any other organisations. How many entries would you like each month? (please tick one box) 1 Entry per month (£2) 2 Entries per month (£4) 3 Entries per month (£6) 4 Entries per month (£8) 5 Entries per month (£10) 10 Entries per month (£20) Other amount of entries: Entries per month total £ Instruction to your Bank or Building Society to pay by Direct Debit Name and full postal address of your Bank or Building Society To: The Manager Bank/ Building Society Address Service user number 6 2 4 1 8 7 Postcode Reference L O T Name(s) of Account Holder(s) Instruction to Bank or Building Society Please pay Kent Wildlife Trust Direct Debits from the account detailed in this instruction subject to the safeguards assured by Account Number the Direct Debit Guarantee. I understand that this instruction may remain with Kent Wildlife Trust and, if so, details will be passed electronically to my Bank/Buildling Society. Sort Code Signature(s) Date Banks and Building Societies may not accept Direct Debit Instructions for some types of account.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Mathew Frith London Wildlife Trust Thank
    Planning Committee THE GREEN BELT OF THE FUTURE SEMINAR Mathew Frith London Wildlife Trust Thank you, Barbara [Young]. I am not either a landscape architect or a planner. I want you to imagine the song of a skylark in this room. It would be interesting to know how many have actually heard a skylark in the last six months or so, but therein lies an issue. I would say they are an iconic species of our green belt. This is Hutchinson’s Bank [local nature reserve and Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation] in south Croydon, in New Addington, it is a site that we have been managing for 30 years. I am going to upset our chair by now saying that we have actually spent a huge amount of time over those 30 years removing a lot of trees, damaging the critically-important chalk grassland, one of the most globally-threatened habitats that we have in this country. However, the issue here is that the community that live in New Addington, on the left there, are surrounded by green belt but I reckon that very few actually can access it because most of it is closed to them. It is agricultural land, it is horsiculture, it is a landfill and we are the one site that is closest to them that we maintain as open land. It is one of a number of sites that contain a huge range of biodiversity that is characteristic of the green belt, but, as we have heard already today, the architects of the green belt did not foresee the impacts of industrial agriculture, they did not see the future impacts of social change and this biodiversity, as we now know, in many ways is under threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report
    EB 08.20 Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report Elham Park Wood Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 1 Contents 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 2. Components of GI 3. Functions and benefits of GI 4. GI policy context 5. The GI resource in Shepway 6. Biodiversity GI in Shepway 7. Linear Feature GI 8. Civic Amenity GI 9. Key issues and opportunities in relation to strategic development sites Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 2 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 1.1 A number of definitions of Green Infrastructure (GI) are in use including:- PPS12 – “…a network of multi-functional green space, both new and existing, both rural and urban, which supports the natural and ecological processes and is integral to the health and quality of life of sustainable communities.” 1.2 South East Plan/South East GI Partnership – “For the purposes of spatial planning the term green infrastructure (GI) relates to the active planning and management of sub-regional networks of multi-functional open space. These networks should be managed and designed to support biodiversity and wider quality of life, particularly in areas undergoing large scale change.“ 1.3 Natural England – “Green Infrastructure (GI) is a strategically planned and delivered network of high quality green spaces and other environmental features. It should be designed and managed as a multifunctional resource capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities. Green Infrastructure includes parks, open spaces, playing fields, woodlands, allotments and private gardens.” 1.4 The common features of these definitions are that GI:- • involves natural and managed green areas in urban and rural settings • is about the strategic connection of open green areas • should provide multiple benefits for people 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Plan Habitat Targets a Review of Progress and Forward Recommendations March 2017
    The London Plan Habitat Targets a review of progress and forward recommendations March 2017 New reedbeds at Woodberry Wetlands, Manor House © Don Lewis Report authors Michael Waller Grad CIEEM (LWT) Mathew Frith MCIEEM (LWT) Chloe Smith (GiGL) Andy Foy (GiGL) This page is deliberately left blank London Plan habitat targets review March 2017 Contents 1. Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7 3. Biodiversity action planning context ......................................................................................... 8 3.1 London Plan target origins ................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Policy context ................................................................................................................... 8 4. Review methodology .............................................................................................................. 12 4.1 Overview of data sources ............................................................................................... 12 4.1.1 Data source strengths and weaknesses .................................................................. 12 4.2 Collating available datasets to estimate the current habitat extents ................................ 13 5. Review of habitat targets.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date
    planning report PDU/2857/02 2 October 2012 Land at Colonial Drive, Bollo Lane, Chiswick Park in the London Borough of Ealing planning application no. P/2012/0338 Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Demolition of the existing warehouses and the erection of a mixed-use development of up to eight storeys comprising 124 residential units (33 x affordable and 91 market units), 589sq.m of office space (Use Class B1) and a 478 sq.m. childcare facility (Use Class D1). The provision of 12 disabled car parking spaces and four integral cycle stores. Provision of footpath on North boundary to link Bollo Lane to Chiswick Business Park, associated public realm, landscaping and toddler play space. The applicant The applicant is Blackstone Ltd. and the architect is BFLS. Strategic issues The Mayor previously raised issues relating to housing, children’s playspace, design, inclusive design, climate change, biodiversity, noise air quality and transport. These matters have now been satisfactorily resolved and the proposed application is acceptable in strategic planning policy terms. The Council’s decision In this instance Ealing Council has resolved to grant permission, subject to the satisfactory completion of a legal agreement under Section 106. Recommendation That Ealing Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Hutchinson's Bank and Chapel Bank Nature Reserves Management Brief
    Hutchinson’s Bank and Chapel Bank Nature Reserves Management Brief 2012-17 Protecting London’s wildlife for the future 1 Hutchinson’s Bank and Chapel Bank Nature Reserves Management Brief Hutchinson’s Bank and Chapel Bank Nature Reserves Hutchinson’s Bank Nature Reserve is one of the largest areas of chalk grassland remaining in the Greater London area. Managed as a nature reserve since London Wildlife Trust acquired a licence to manage the site in 1986, it has been subject to a more significant spate of restoration work over the last decade. Situated on the eastern flank of a dry valley in the southern part of the London Borough of Croydon, the site is gradually restored under the management of London Wildlife Trust in partnership with the Downlands Countryside Small blue Management project. It supports important populations © Cathy Page of rare plant and invertebrate species, most notably the nationally rare greater yellow rattle, the scarce man orchid and the small blue butterfly. Similar habitats occur at the nearby Chapel Bank Nature Reserve, which is managed as part of the same unit by the Trust (since 1987). The area of chalk grassland here is smaller and restricted to glades within a predominantly woodland cover. Chapel Bank is especially noted for the presence of mat- grass fescue, a nationally scarce species, as well as impressive displays of common spotted and other orchids. Woodland cover at Chapel Bank consists of recent secondary woodland developed on former open downland, as well as areas of ancient woodland. Two adjacent areas are also managed by the Trust within the reserve complex.
    [Show full text]