Sulfur Dioxide Reactions with Aqueous Solutions Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sulfur Dioxide Reactions with Aqueous Solutions Of SULFUR DIOXIDE REACTIONS WITH AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF MANGANESE AT HIGH TEMPERATURE AND WITH AMMONIA IN THE GAS PHASE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies and Research by Edwin M. Hartley, Jr. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Chemical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology September, 1973 SULFUR DIOXIDE REACTIONS ftlTH AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF MANGANESE AT HIGH TEMPERATURE AND WITH AMMONIA IN THE GAS PHASE Approved: > J * / Chairman 7 T z. Jk t /) . J *~ *' ' --? Date approved by Chairman; '*/''//£ ii Dedication To Barbara iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply indebted to my thesis advisor, Dr. Michael J. Matteson for his assistance with this endeavor. His expertise in the field, his constant activity in staying abreast of new developments and enquiring into innovative ideas and techniques have been a contin­ ual source of motivation. To Dr. G. L. Bridger, Director of the School of Chemical Engi­ neering, I am very grateful for his advice and assistance throughout my stay at Georgia Tech. His making available to me a part time instructorship is most appreciated as well as the other essential sources of assistance such as the Work Study Program, NSF Traineeship, Dow and DuPont Fellowships. The helpful and constructive critique of Reading Committee Member Dr. C. W. Gorton Is appreciated as well as his friendship during the past few years. The assistance received from Dr. Henry Neumann and Dr. W. T. Ziegler was essential to the completion of this work. Their liberal sharing of their time is acknowledged with gratitude as is the helpful comments of Dr. Joseph Smrekor. The Staff of the Price Gilbert Library were never too busy to provide help regardless of the time and effort required. To Jim Nabors many thanks for his technical competence and cooperation in maintaining the laboratory instrumentation and equipment and thanks also to Bob Shucker for his expert help with the Univac Computer, iv TABLE OF OONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vii SUMMARY ix Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 General Introduction Introduction to SO2 Reactions with Aqueous Solutions of Manganese Scope of this Work II. LITERATURE SURVEY 7 III. EXPERIMENTAL 14 Solubility of S02 in Dilute Sulfuric Acid IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 28 Rate Constant Determinations Calculated vs. Experimental Results Humidity Effects V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65 Conclusions Recommendations VI. INTRODUCTION TO SO REACTIONS WITH NH IN TOE GAS PHASE . 7 67 Scope of this Work VII. LITERATURE SURVEY 67 VIII. EXPERIMENTAL 77 V TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Chapter Page IX. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 88 X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 122 Conclusions Recommendations APPENDICES A. TEST DATA - SO REACTIONS WITH AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF MANGANESE 125 B. EQUILIBRIUM H S04 CONCENTRATION CALCULATION 131 C. SPECIFICATIONS OF GASES AND REAGENTS 135 D. EXPERIMENTAL EQUIPMENT DETAILS 136 E. PROCEDURE FOR NH - SO TEST AND SAMPLE CALCULATION . .. 138 F. SO -NH REACTION DETAILS 142 G. A MODEL CONSIDERED FOR THE REACTIONS OF SO + NH TO FORM AMMONIUM SULFATE . 153 H. ACCURACY OF RESULTS 159 BIBLIOGRAPHY 161 VITA 166 LIST OF TABLES e Page Slope-Intercept Data for k ' and K ' 35 Estimated Rate Constant k_ at Various Temperatures ... 37 Estimated Rate Constants k. and k ' at Various Temperatures 47 Calculated and Experimental Acid Concentration vs. Time for 1CC, 25°C and 38°C 49 Rate Constant Variations in Figure 15 54 Experimental Values of J and t Used in Figures 16, 17, and 18 56 Effect of Humidity on SO Absorption at 25°C 58 Initial Reactant Concentrations, NH -SO Reactions ... 88 Summary of X-Ray Diffraction Analysis 94 Series G-K Reactants and Products 100 Sulfur Dioxide - Ammonia Reaction Parameters 105 SO -NH Reaction Details 142 Slope Intercept Data for k ' and K 156 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Experimental Apparatus for Kinetic Studies of SO Oxidation by Mn** Catalysis 16 2. SO Concentration in Reactor Off-gas, PPM 21 3. Solubility of SO Gas in Sulfuric Acid Solution at Various Temperatures . 26 4. Sulfuric Acid Concentration vs. Time For Various Temperatures 29 5. Sulfuric Acid Formation Rate vs. Time for Various Temperatures 30 6. HjSC^ Concentration vs. Time at 1°C, 25°C, and 38°C for Extended Periods of Time . 32 7. Inverse Initial Reaction Rate vs. Inverse Initial SO Concentration for Determination of Rate Constants k ' and K ' at 25°C 38 6 s 8. Log k/ vs. (r'K)"1 39 o 1 9. Log k? vs. (T^K)" 40 1 10. Log kx vs. (T^K)" 45 1 11. Log k2' vs. (T^K)" 46 12. Sulfuric Acid Concentration vs. Time, 38°C 51 13. Sulfuric Acid Concentration vs. Time, 25°C 52 14. Sulfuric Acid Concentration vs. Time, 1°C 53 15. Sulfuric Acid Concentration vs. Time at 25°C with Rate Constant Variations 55 16. (Sulfuric Acid Cone.)2 vs. Time for 1°C 60 17. (Sulfuric Acid Cone.)2 vs. Time, 25°C 61 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued) Figure Pige 18. (Sulfuric Acid Cone.)2 vs. Time for 38°C 62 19. Log K' vs. (T^K)"1 63 20. Effect of Gas Stream Humidity on SO Absorption at 25°C . 64 21. Flow Reactor for NH -SO Reactions 81 22. Experimental Apparatus for SO -NH Reactions .... 85 23. Integral Analysis of NH3-S02 Reaction 96 24. Series A Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time Ill 25. Series B Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 112 26. Series C Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 113 27. Series D Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 114 2b. Series E Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 115 29. Series F. Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 116 30. Series G Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 117 31. Series H Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 118 32. Series I Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 119 33. Series J Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 120 34. Series K Reactions - Prod. Cone. vs. Time 121 35. Slope Intercept Data for k' and K 157 IX SUMMARY The kinetics of the reaction of SO in the aqueous phase forming sulfuric acid by manganous ion catalysis was investigated experimentally by dispersing a constant flow of air - SO gas mixture into a continu­ ous phase of water and dissolved manganese sulfate. Experimental tests were made with an SO gas concentration in the range of 3000 - 5000 PPM, .001 and .003 molar MnSO , and a temperature range from 1° to 65°C. A semi-empirical rate equation describing the reaction is given which rep­ resents the experimental results within the estimated 10% accuracy of the experimental data. The rate decrease observed with increasing sul­ furic acid concentration was found not to be caused primarily by the decrease in SO solubility as had been reported by others. A minor but observable decrease in initial absorption rate was found when the humidity of the gas stream was reduced from saturated air to dry air. The heterogeneous reaction of SO and NH gases in humid air at 23°C to form solid reaction products was studied experimentally. Results were similar to those reported by others on the reaction of anhydrous SO and NH gases to form solids in that a variety of products are formed depending on the concentrations of the reactants. With a large excess of HO vapor and 0 , e.g., air at 50% R.H., SO and NH gases in the ini­ tial concentration range of 4 to 60 millimoles per cu. meter and in th§ mole ratio of ^ |:|::[NH ]i[SO ] react to form crystalline ammonium sul­ fate. At equimolar concentration, a few percent of ammonium sulfamate is also formed. The reaction appears to be first order with respect to X both SO and NH and being irreversible, goes to completion. A differ­ ential rate equation and its integrated form are given which describes the experimental data within the estimated 1% accuracy of the experi- mental data. At lower concentrations of HO (trace to 31 mM-m ) the principle products are assumed to be NH *S0 and (NH ) «S0 with minor amounts of NH SO , (NH4) S 0?, NH4N , and N H?S04, Product identification of solid reaction products was by X-ray diffraction. At a lower con- _o centratio n of 0„ (16 mM-m ) the reaction product was primarily (NH ) 'SO^ wit h secondary products of N H SO and NH SO . The aerodynamic diameter of-particles produced from NH and SO gases in air containing a trace, 3-5 PPM water vapor, ranges from 1.2 ym to 2\im with a mean of 1.5 ^m. 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION General Introduction This research consisted of a study of the kinetics of two types of reactions of sulfur dioxide. The first reaction, which is covered in the first part of this thesis, is the oxidation of SO to sulfuric acid in an aqueous solution of manganese sulfate. The second reaction type, which is covered in the second part, is the formation of solid reaction products from NH gas combining with SO gas in the presence of 0- gas and HO vapor in air. Both reactions are applicable to the general areas of the consequences of SO gas emissions to the atmosphere, control of those emissions, and recovery of sulfur as its compounds. These reactions can and do occur both in concentrated stack gases and in the atmosphere removed from the SO emitting sources where concentra­ tions are lower. The products of SO reactions (sulfates, sulfuric acid) compared to SO gas are usually many fold more toxic to plant, animal 45 and human life and more corrosive. In addition to the interest in the reactions which occur spontaneously, there is application to planned reactions in order to convert SO gas to its more easily handled compounds for recovery and control.
Recommended publications
  • Enhanced Heterogeneous Uptake of Sulfur Dioxide on Mineral Particles Through Modification of Iron Speciation During Simulated Cloud Processing
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12569–12585, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12569-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Enhanced heterogeneous uptake of sulfur dioxide on mineral particles through modification of iron speciation during simulated cloud processing Zhenzhen Wang1, Tao Wang1, Hongbo Fu1,2,3, Liwu Zhang1, Mingjin Tang4, Christian George5, Vicki H. Grassian6, and Jianmin Chen1 1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China 2Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China 4State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China 5University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, IRCELYON, 69626, Villeurbanne, France 6Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA Correspondence: Hongbo Fu ([email protected]) and Jianmin Chen ([email protected]) Received: 7 May 2019 – Discussion started: 5 June 2019 Revised: 7 August 2019 – Accepted: 5 September 2019 – Published: 9 October
    [Show full text]
  • SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content
    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994,33, 1231-1236 1231 SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content Hsunling Bai' Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Chiao- Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, R.O.C. Pratim Biswas and Tim C. Keener Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 -0071 The removal of SO2 by NH3 gas injection at various temperatures and moisture contents has been studied experimentally. The product compositions of the NH3-SO2-HzO vapor reactions were also reported. A thermodynamic analysis was carried out to predict the SO2 removal as well as the product compositions. Both the experimental results and thermodynamic analysis indicated that SO2 removal and the product compositions are sensitive to the reaction temperature. Moisture content, once in large excess of the stoichiometric requirement, does not have a strong effect on the product compositions but plays an important role in the SO2 removal. Introduction conditions. Stromberger (1984) used X-ray diffraction and identified the product particles to be (NH&S04 Sulfur dioxide removal from flue gases is a goal of many crystals. air pollution engineers. Significant efforts in the develop- ment of new flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies Although a number of studies on the removal of SO2 are being made. Major processes related to FGD tech- from flue gases by NH3 injection have been conducted, nologies include water scrubbing, metal ion solutions, there is disagreement on the operating condition (such as catalytic oxidation, dry or semidry adsorption, wet lime temperature) that a high removal efficiency can be or limestone scrubbing, double alkali process, and ammonia obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
    The information presented here reflects EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2002. The Agency is in the process of updating this information to reflect modifications included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003. The revised information will be posted on the Agency's Clear Skies Web site (www.epa.gov/clearskies) as soon as possible. Overview of the Human Health and Environmental Effects of Power Generation: Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Mercury (Hg) June 2002 Contents The Clear Skies Initiative is intended to reduce the health and environmental impacts of power generation. This document briefly summarizes the health and environmental effects of power generation, specifically those associated with sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), and mercury (Hg). This document does not address the specific impacts of the Clear Skies Initiative. • Overview -- Emissions and transport • Fine Particles • Ozone (Smog) • Visibility • Acid Rain • Nitrogen Deposition • Mercury Photo Credits: 1: USDA; EPA; EPA; VTWeb.com 2: NADP 6: EPA 7: ?? 10: EPA 2 Electric Power Generation: Major Source of Emissions 2000 Sulfur Dioxide 2000 Nitrogen Oxides 1999 Mercury Fuel Combustion- Industrial Processing electric utilities Transportation Other stationary combustion * Miscellaneous * Other stationary combustion includes residential and commercial sources. • Power generation continues to be an important source of these major pollutants. • Power generation contributes 63% of SO2, 22% of NOX, and 37% of man-made mercury to the environment. 3 Overview of SO2, NOX, and Mercury Emissions, Transport, and Transformation • When emitted into the atmosphere, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury undergo chemical reactions to form compounds that can travel long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Gas. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 012833 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture EYE IRRITATION - Category 2A TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION - Category 1 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. Causes serious eye irritation. May damage fertility or the unborn child. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Obtain special instructions before use. Wear protective gloves. Wear protective clothing. Wear eye or face protection. Wash thoroughly after handling. Response : IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice or attention.
    [Show full text]
  • SDS # : 014869 Supplier's Details : Airgas USA, LLC and Its Affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Gas. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 014869 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Not applicable. Response : Not applicable. Storage : Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. Disposal : Not applicable. Hazards not otherwise : In addition to any other important health or physical hazards, this product may displace classified oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Section 3. Composition/information on ingredients Substance/mixture : Mixture Other means of : Not available.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Chalcogen Chemistry
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHALCOGEN CHEMISTRY Tristram Chivers Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada WHERE IS CALGARY? Lecture 1: Background / Introduction Outline • Chalcogens (O, S, Se, Te, Po) • Elemental Forms: Allotropes • Uses • Trends in Atomic Properties • Spin-active Nuclei; NMR Spectra • Halides as Reagents • Cation Formation and Stabilisation • Anions: Structures • Solutions of Chalcogens in Ionic Liquids • Oxides and Imides: Multiple Bonding 3 Elemental Forms: Sulfur Allotropes Sulfur S6 S7 S8 S10 S12 S20 4 Elemental Forms: Selenium and Tellurium Allotropes Selenium • Grey form - thermodynamically stable: helical structure cf. plastic sulfur. R. Keller, et al., Phys. Rev. B. 1977, 4404. • Red form - cyclic Cyclo-Se8 (cyclo-Se7 and -Se6 also known). Tellurium • Silvery-white, metallic lustre; helical structure, cf. grey Se. • Cyclic allotropes only known entrapped in solid-state structures e.g. Ru(Ten)Cl3 (n = 6, 8, 9) M. Ruck, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6382 5 Uses – Sulfur Sulfur : Occurs naturally in underground deposits. • Recovered by Frasch process (superheated water). • H2S in sour gas (> 70%): Recovered by Klaus process: Klaus Process: 2 H S + SO 3/8 S + 2 H O 2 2 8 2 • Primary industrial use (70 %): H2SO4 in phosphate fertilizers 6 Uses – Selenium and Tellurium Selenium and Tellurium : Recovered during the refining of copper sulfide ores Selenium: • Photoreceptive properties – used in photocopiers (As2Se3) • Imparts red color in glasses Tellurium: • As an alloy with Cu, Fe, Pb and to harden
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Sulfur Aerosol-Forming Mechanism
    Elemental sulfur aerosol-forming mechanism Manoj Kumara and Joseph S. Franciscoa,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588 Contributed by Joseph S. Francisco, December 21, 2016 (sent for review November 13, 2016; reviewed by James Lyons and Hua-Gen Yu) Elemental sulfur aerosols are ubiquitous in the atmospheres of Venus, reaction mechanism that may possibly convert the SOn + nH2S ancient Earth, and Mars. There is now an evolving body of evidence (n = 1, 2, 3) chemistries into the S8 aerosol in the gas phase suggesting that these aerosols have also played a role in the evolution (Scheme S1). It is the thermodynamics of these processes, and of early life on Earth. However, the exact details of their formation their catalysis by water and sulfuric acid, that we investigate here. mechanism remain an open question. The present theoretical calcula- This mechanism may not only help in better understanding the tions suggest a chemical mechanism that takes advantage of the in- role of sulfur cycle involving SOn,S8, and H2S as the potential S n = teraction between sulfur oxides, SOn ( 1, 2, 3) and hydrogen sulfide MIF carrier from the atmosphere to the ocean surface, but may 0 (nH2S), resulting in the efficient formation of a Sn+1 particle. Interest- also provide deeper insight into the formation mechanism of S + → + ingly, the SOn nH2S Sn+1 nH2O reactions occur via low-energy aerosols in various other environments. pathways under water or sulfuric acid catalysis. Once the S + particles n 1 We first explored the uncatalyzed gas-phase reactions of SOn with are formed, they may further nucleate to form larger polysulfur aero- nH2S using quantum-chemical calculations at the coupled cluster sols, thus providing a chemical framework for understanding the for- single and double substitution method with a perturbative treatment 0 mation mechanism of S aerosols in different environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical and Preservative Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solution for Brining Fruit
    The Chemical and Preservative Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solution for Brining Fruit Circular of Information 629 June 1969 Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis The Chemical and Preservative Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solution for Brining Fruit C. H. PAYNE, D. V. BEAVERS, and R. F. CAIN Department of Food Science and Technology Sweet cherries and other fruits are preserved in sul- control are given in papers by Waiters et al. (1963) and fur dioxide solutions for manufacture into maraschino, Yang et al. (1966). cocktail, and glace fruit. The sulfur dioxide solution, Sulfur dioxide and calcium are directly related to commonly called brine, may be prepared from liquid brined cherry quality. Improper use of these chemicals sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite, or sodium metabisulfite may result in cherries that are soft, poorly bleached, or using alkali or acid to control pH. Calcium salts such as spoiled due to fermentation. It is the purpose of this calcium hydroxide, calcium carbonate, and calcium chlo- circular to show how the basic chemical and preservative ride are added to the brine to prevent cracking and pro- components of brine solutions are afifected during prep- mote firming of the fruit tissue through interaction with aration, storage, and use. pectic materials. Directions for brine preparation and Chemical Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solutions When sulfur dioxide or materials containing sulfur range of sulfur dioxide concentrations, the relative dis- dioxide (bisulfite or metabisulfite) are dissolved in tribution of the sulfur dioxide ionic forms is constant. water, three types of chemical substances are formed: Within the initial pH range used for brining cher- sulfurous acid (H2SO3),1 bisulfite (HSO3"), and sulfite ries, there is a predominance of calcium bisulfite (SO~).
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Dioxide / Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Propane / Sulfur Dioxide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Dioxide / Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Propane / Sulfur Dioxide Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Gas. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 019536 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. May increase respiration and heart rate. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Not applicable. Response : Not applicable. Storage : Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. Disposal : Not applicable. Hazards not otherwise : In addition to any other important health or physical hazards, this product may displace classified oxygen and cause rapid suffocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Structure, Stability, and Cooperativity of Chalcogen Bonding in Sulfur Dioxide and Hydrated Sulfur Dioxide Clusters
    Electronic structure, stability, and cooperativity of chalcogen bonding in sulfur dioxide and hydrated sulfur dioxide clusters: a DFT study and wave functional analysis Venkataramanan Natarajan Sathiyamoorthy ( [email protected] ) SHARP Substratum https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-0894 Research Article Keywords: Chalcogen bond, Hydrogen bond, Non-covalent interactions, QTAIM, Cooperativity Posted Date: July 7th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665149/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/28 Abstract Density functional theory calculations and wave functional analysis are used to examine the (SO2)n and (SO2)n–H2O clusters with n = 1–7. The nature of interactions is explored by molecular electrostatic potentials, electron density distribution, atoms in molecules, noncovalent interaction, and energy decomposition analysis. The putative global minimum of SO2 molecules has a 3D growth pattern with tetrahedral. In the hydrated SO2 clusters, the pure hydrogen bond isomers are less stable than the O···S chalcogen bond isomers. The cluster absorption energy of SO2 on water increases with the size of sulfur dioxide, implying reactivity of sulfur dioxide with water increases with size. The presence of cooperativity was evident from the excellent linearity plot of binding energy/polarizability vs the number of SO2 molecules. Molecular electrostatic potential analysis elucidates the reason for the facile formation of S···O chalcogen than hydrogen bonding in hydrated sulfur dioxide. Atoms in molecule analysis characterize the bonds chalcogen and H bonds to be weak and electrostatic dominant. EDA analysis shows electrostatic interaction is dominated in complexes with more intermolecular chalcogen bonding and orbital interaction for systems with intermolecular H-bonding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxidation of Sulfur(IV) by Reaction with Iron(III): a Critical Review and Data Analysis Cite This: Phys
    PCCP View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue The oxidation of sulfur(IV) by reaction with iron(III): a critical review and data analysis Cite this: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20,4020 Peter Warneck The dependences on ionic strength of the hydrolysis constants of Fe3+ and of the first dissociation constant of sulfurous acid are briefly reviewed. The data are needed to derive from apparent stability constants reported in the literature the stability constants for the three iron–sulfito complexes defined 2+ À + + À À + by the equilibria (c1) FeOH + HSO3 = FeSO3 +H2O, (c2) FeSO3 + HSO3 = Fe(SO3)2 +H , (c3a) À À 2À 3 À1 Fe(SO3)2 + HSO3 = Fe(SO3)3H , where Kc1 = 1982 Æ 518 dm mol , Kc2 = 0.72 Æ 0.08, Kc3a = 189 Æ 9dm3 molÀ1 (ionic strength m = 0.1 mol dmÀ3). The rapid formation of these complexes is followed by À a slower decomposition leading to the formation of SO3 radicals; the associated rate coefficients are À1 À1 À1 k1 =0.19s , k1a E 0.04 s ,andk1b E 0.08 s , respectively. The subsequent reaction leads to dithionate and sulfate as products. Overall rates and product yields from a variety of studies of the slow reaction Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. are found to be consistent with a mechanism, in which the production of dithionate occurs mainly by the À + À 2+ 3+ reaction of SO3 with FeSO3 and that of sulfate by the reaction of SO3 with FeOH and/or Fe .Therole Received 9th November 2017, of copper as a catalyst is also analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMISTRY 1A NOMENCLATURE WORKSHEET Chemical Formula
    CHEMISTRY 1A NOMENCLATURE WORKSHEET Chemical Formula Nomenclature Practice: Complete these in lab and on your own time for practice. You should complete this by Sunday. Use the stock form for the transition metals. Give the formula for the following: 1. sulfur dioxide ____SO2______________ 26. methane ____CH4_____________ 2. sodium thiosulfate ____Na2S2O3__________ 27. copper (II) sulfate ____CuSO4___________ 3. ammonium phosphate ____(NH4)3PO4_________ 28. nitrogen dioxide ____NO2_____________ 4. potassium chlorate ____KClO3____________ 29. mercury (II) chloride ____HgCl2____________ 5. lithium hydroxide ____LiOH_____________ 30. tin (II) bromide ____SnBr2____________ 6. zinc nitrite ____Zn(NO2)2__________ 31. silver iodide ____AgI______________ 7. sodium sulfate ____Na2SO4____________ 32. magnesium bisulfite ____Mg(HSO3)2________ 8. cobalt (IV) bisulfite ____Co(HSO3)4_________ 33. carbon disulfide ____CS2______________ 9. cadmium nitrate ____Cd(NO3)2__________ 34. beryllium periodate ____Be(IO4)2__________ 10. nitric oxide ____NO_______________ 35. platinum (IV) cyanide ____Pt(CN)4___________ 11. hydrogen peroxide ____H2O2______________ 36. ammonia ____NH3______________ 12. carbon monoxide ____CO_______________ 37. dinitrogen oxide ____N2O______________ 13. silicon dioxide ____SiO2______________ 38. ferric oxide ____Fe2O3____________ 14. copper (I) bromide ____CuBr______________ 39. gold (III) chloride ____AuCl3____________ 15. iron (II) chromate ____FeCrO4____________ 40. strontium sulfide ____SrS______________ 16. mercury (I) fluoride
    [Show full text]