DOCSLIB.ORG

Elemental Sulfur Aerosol-Forming Mechanism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elemental Sulfur Aerosol-Forming Mechanism Elemental sulfur aerosol-forming mechanism Manoj Kumara and Joseph S. Franciscoa,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588 Contributed by Joseph S. Francisco, December 21, 2016 (sent for review November 13, 2016; reviewed by James Lyons and Hua-Gen Yu) Elemental sulfur aerosols are ubiquitous in the atmospheres of Venus, reaction mechanism that may possibly convert the SOn + nH2S ancient Earth, and Mars. There is now an evolving body of evidence (n = 1, 2, 3) chemistries into the S8 aerosol in the gas phase suggesting that these aerosols have also played a role in the evolution (Scheme S1). It is the thermodynamics of these processes, and of early life on Earth. However, the exact details of their formation their catalysis by water and sulfuric acid, that we investigate here. mechanism remain an open question. The present theoretical calcula- This mechanism may not only help in better understanding the tions suggest a chemical mechanism that takes advantage of the in- role of sulfur cycle involving SOn,S8, and H2S as the potential S n = teraction between sulfur oxides, SOn ( 1, 2, 3) and hydrogen sulfide MIF carrier from the atmosphere to the ocean surface, but may 0 (nH2S), resulting in the efficient formation of a Sn+1 particle. Interest- also provide deeper insight into the formation mechanism of S + → + ingly, the SOn nH2S Sn+1 nH2O reactions occur via low-energy aerosols in various other environments. pathways under water or sulfuric acid catalysis. Once the S + particles n 1 We first explored the uncatalyzed gas-phase reactions of SOn with are formed, they may further nucleate to form larger polysulfur aero- nH2S using quantum-chemical calculations at the coupled cluster sols, thus providing a chemical framework for understanding the for- single and double substitution method with a perturbative treatment 0 mation mechanism of S aerosols in different environments. of triple excitations [CCSD(T)]/aug-cc-pVTZ//M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory. We considered both singlet and triplet states for SO. sulfur aerosols | catalysis | planetary environment | nonphotochemical | Although the triplet ground state of SO is more stable than its singlet hydrogen sulfide 3 state, the calculations suggest that the SO + H2Sreactionleadsto the formation of HS and HOS radicals, and is endothermic by 1 ulfur chemistry is a ubiquitous component in the atmo- 33.5 kcal/mol (Fig. S1). By contrast, the SO + H2Sreactionishighly Sspheres of Venus, early Earth, and Mars (1). The different exothermic (Fig. S2). The relative energies of the computed transi- − − 0 2− 2− 2− 1 forms of sulfur (e.g., S2 ,S ,S,S2O3 ,SO3 ,SO4 ) provide tion-state structures and minima for the uncatalyzed SO + H2Sre- energy for different types of sulfur metabolisms in different en- action are shown in Fig. S2. The possible source of 1SO is either the vironments. The sulfur cycle in the Archean atmosphere is also photolysis of SO2 at λ < 220 nm or the partial oxidation of H2S. believed to have played a role in the early evolution of life on There have also been reports that 1SO could be ejected directly from – 1 Earth (2 7). The emerging photochemical picture suggests that the volcanic vent (20). However, the SO + H2Sreactionwouldface 0 1 reduced elemental sulfur (S ) and sulfate (SO4) are the dominant competition from the SO + O2 → SO2 + Oinatmosphere,sug- – 1 sulfur species in the Archean (2 9). However, the latest isotope gesting that the SO + H2Sismorelikelytohappenlocallywherethe signatures of microscopic sulfides in marine sulfate deposits indicate concentration of sulfur gases is expected to be high. 1 that the ultimate source for this metabolic sulfur cycling was at- The SO + H2S reaction results in the stepwise formation of 0 mospherically derived S (10). One of the most important sources of H2S2O, which involves a barrier of 23.2 kcal/mol and has an sulfur into the atmosphere is from volcanoes, and the most abun- exothermicity of 30.1 kcal/mol. The comparative analysis of the 1 dant sulfur gases are SO2 and H2S. The photochemistry of these potential energy surfaces for the SO and SO2 (Fig. S3)reactions gases in the atmosphere yields elemental sulfur, sulfur particles, reveals that the 1SO reaction is relatively more favorable. Al- sulfuric acid, and oceanic sulfate. Scheme 1 illustrates the chemical though the uncatalyzed SO2 + H2S reaction has been previously processes suggested to be important in the photochemical oxidation calculated (13), we reexamined the reaction here in greater detail of volcanic sulfur species in the early atmosphere of Earth. at the same level of theory to facilitate the comparison between The S0 aerosols are not only involved in the Archean life, but – are also implicated in other environments (1, 11 19). For example, Significance polysulfur (Sx = S2→8) aerosols are thought to exist in clouds of Venus and their role as the unknown UV absorber in its lower The elemental sulfur aerosols are an important constituent in the atmosphere has been discussed in the literature (14). The S8 atmospheres of Earth, Mars, and Venus. There is now evidence particles are also observed in the marine troposphere (15). Finally, suggesting that these aerosols have also played a role in the the role of S8 aerosols in explaining the early climate of Mars evolution of early life on Earth. Traditionally, the photolysis of atmosphere has also been debated (16). 0 sulfur gases by UV light is thought to be the main mechanism for Despite being of broad appeal, the formation mechanism of S the formation of sulfur particles in these atmospheres. But, in aerosols remains an open question. The photolysis of SO2 and SO the theoretical calculations reported here, we propose a non- λ < by UV light with 220 nm has generally been invoked to explain photochemical mechanism for the formation of elemental sulfur the mass-independent fractionation (MIF) of isotope effects in the aerosols that takes advantage of the interaction between sulfur – sulfur cycle during the Archean (2 9). However, the contribution of oxides and hydrogen sulfide under water or sulfuric acid other mass-independent chemical reactions to this geologic record catalysis. These results provide a chemical framework for remains unclear. To fully understand the sulfur cycle, it is necessary understanding the formation mechanism of S0 aerosols in to identify all sources of sulfur compounds and account for all planetary atmospheres. species which can occur in the atmosphere. Author contributions: M.K. and J.S.F. designed research; M.K. performed research; M.K. Results and Discussion analyzed data; and M.K. wrote the paper. SOn (n = 1, 2, 3) + nH2S Potential Energy Surface. As can be seen Reviewers: J.L., Arizona State University; and H.-G.Y., Brookhaven National Laboratory. from Scheme 1, which summarizes the current state of sulfur The authors declare no conflict of interest. chemistry in the atmosphere, there is a gap in our understanding 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. of the connection between sulfur oxide chemistry and sulfur This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. aerosol formation. Herein, we describe a nonphotochemical 1073/pnas.1620870114/-/DCSupplemental. 864–869 | PNAS | January 31, 2017 | vol. 114 | no. 5 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1620870114 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 shown to catalyze hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)-based addition reactions (21). Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is an important constituent in the Venus atmosphere (25) and has been predicted to be one of the most efficient catalysts available for the HAT-based reactions (22–24). Building upon these recent developments, we next ex- amined the SOn + nH2S reaction, which also involves an HAT reaction, in the presence of H2OandH2SO4. 1 The formation of H2S2Ofromthe SO + H2Sreactionandits subsequent dehydration to S2 becomes facile under H2OorH2SO4 catalysis (Fig. 1). H2SO4 turns out to be a better catalyst than water because of its ability to stabilize reactants and products by forming sterically more favorable double hydrogen-bonding interactions. The alternate decomposition pathway for H2S2O, which leads to S2O, is also significantly impacted under catalysis. However, the barriers for the S2O-forming decomposition under catalysis are relatively higher than the dehydration one, suggesting that the probability of this de- composition pathway in water-rich surfaces or acidic environments 1 may be quite low. H2S2Ointhe SO + H2Sreactionisformedwith an excess energy of 30.1 kcal/mol, which may play a role in making a S2O-based S3 channel accessible under catalytic conditions. On the other hand, we only examined the SO2 + 2H2S → S3 + 2H2O-forming pathway in the presence of a single H2OandH2SO4 molecule (Fig. 1). This is because the S4-particle-forming pathways are mediated by very high-lying transition states (Fig. S3)andarenot expected to become accessible even under H2OorH2SO4 catalysis. The overall SO2 + 2H2S → S3 + 2H2O reaction is calculated to be 5.7 kcal/mol exothermic. The uncatalyzed H2S2O2 formation involves an effective barrier of 30.5 kcal/mol. Under H2OandH2SO4 catalysis, the reaction barrier is appreciably lowered to 14.6 and 14.7 kcal/mol, respectively. The subsequent dehydration of H2S2O2, which produces S2O, has a barrier of 28.4 kcal/mol and an exothermicity of 2.5 kcal/mol Scheme 1. Sulfur photochemistry in an anoxic early atmosphere. Sulfur is that are significantly impacted under catalysis. H2SO4 produces emitted to the atmosphere from volcanoes as sulfur dioxide and hydrogen more catalytic effect than water in this case; the dehydration barriers sulfide, and is removed by rainout of soluble gases and by formation and for the H2SO4-andH2O-catalyzed reactions are lowered to 12.1 and deposition of sulfate and elemental sulfur particles. 15.8 kcal/mol, respectively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EPA Method 8: Determination of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfur Dioxide
    733 METHOD 8 - DETERMINATION OF SULFURIC ACID AND SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES NOTE: This method does not include all of the specifications (e.g., equipment and supplies) and procedures (e.g., sampling and analytical) essential to its performance. Some material is incorporated by reference from other methods in this part. Therefore, to obtain reliable results, persons using this method should have a thorough knowledge of at least the following additional test methods: Method 1, Method 2, Method 3, Method 5, and Method 6. 1.0 Scope and Application. 1.1 Analytes. Analyte CAS No. Sensitivity Sulfuric acid, including: 0.05 mg/m3 Sulfuric acid 7664-93-9 (0.03 × 10-7 3 (H2SO4) mist 7449-11-9 lb/ft ) Sulfur trioxide (SO3) 3 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 7449-09-5 1.2 mg/m (3 x 10-9 lb/ft3) 1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of H2SO4 (including H2SO4 mist and SO3) and gaseous SO2 emissions from stationary sources. NOTE: Filterable particulate matter may be determined along with H2SO4 and SO2 (subject to the approval of the Administrator) by inserting a heated glass fiber filter 734 between the probe and isopropanol impinger (see Section 6.1.1 of Method 6). If this option is chosen, particulate analysis is gravimetric only; sulfuric acid is not determined separately. 1.3 Data Quality Objectives. Adherence to the requirements of this method will enhance the quality of the data obtained from air pollutant sampling methods. 2.0 Summary of Method. A gas sample is extracted isokinetically from the stack.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Heterogeneous Uptake of Sulfur Dioxide on Mineral Particles Through Modification of Iron Speciation During Simulated Cloud Processing
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12569–12585, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12569-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Enhanced heterogeneous uptake of sulfur dioxide on mineral particles through modification of iron speciation during simulated cloud processing Zhenzhen Wang1, Tao Wang1, Hongbo Fu1,2,3, Liwu Zhang1, Mingjin Tang4, Christian George5, Vicki H. Grassian6, and Jianmin Chen1 1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China 2Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China 4State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China 5University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, IRCELYON, 69626, Villeurbanne, France 6Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA Correspondence: Hongbo Fu ([email protected]) and Jianmin Chen ([email protected]) Received: 7 May 2019 – Discussion started: 5 June 2019 Revised: 7 August 2019 – Accepted: 5 September 2019 – Published: 9 October
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Treatment Processes for Hydrogen Sulfide
    Removing the Stink: Advanced Treatment Processes for Hydrogen Sulfide Clayton Johnson, Christine Owen, Luke Mulford, Shahnawaz Sinha, Zaid Chowdhury, Andre Dieffenthaller, and Andrew Coleman ampa Bay Water supplies drinking The final alternative under considera- water to more than 2 million people in tion is biological oxidation followed by chlo- Clayton Johnson is a project engineer in Tthe greater Tampa Bay and adjacent rination and ultrafiltration following biolog- the Tampa office of the environmental areas. Approximately 60 percent of its source ical oxidation prior to distribution. engineering firm Malcolm Pirnie Inc. water comes from groundwater supplies. This article will discuss preliminary Christine Owen is a water quality assur- ance officer with Tampa Bay Water. Luke Groundwater in some portions of the region findings of this ongoing pilot study, including Mulford is a water quality engineer with has a moderate amount (about 2 mg/L as operational variables and effectiveness of the Hillsborough County Water Resource total sulfides) of hydrogen sulfide. Tampa Bay proposed treatment processes for hydrogen Services. Shahnawaz Sinha is a project Water currently provides water to a water sulfide removal. As many Florida utilities are engineer with Malcolm Pirnie in Phoenix, treatment facility that utilizes aeration fol- faced with the challenge of removing hydro- Arizona. Zaid Chowdhury is a senior lowed by biological oxidation to remove gen sulfide from their groundwater, prelimi- associate with Malcolm Pirnie in Phoenix. hydrogen sulfide. nary results of this study will be broadly Andre Dieffenthaller is a senior associate This combined practice (Figure 1) is applicable. Results from this study will pro- with Malcolm Pirnie in Schaumburg, effective, but there are occasional reductions in vide useful information to water utilities that Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content
    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994,33, 1231-1236 1231 SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content Hsunling Bai' Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Chiao- Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, R.O.C. Pratim Biswas and Tim C. Keener Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 -0071 The removal of SO2 by NH3 gas injection at various temperatures and moisture contents has been studied experimentally. The product compositions of the NH3-SO2-HzO vapor reactions were also reported. A thermodynamic analysis was carried out to predict the SO2 removal as well as the product compositions. Both the experimental results and thermodynamic analysis indicated that SO2 removal and the product compositions are sensitive to the reaction temperature. Moisture content, once in large excess of the stoichiometric requirement, does not have a strong effect on the product compositions but plays an important role in the SO2 removal. Introduction conditions. Stromberger (1984) used X-ray diffraction and identified the product particles to be (NH&S04 Sulfur dioxide removal from flue gases is a goal of many crystals. air pollution engineers. Significant efforts in the develop- ment of new flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies Although a number of studies on the removal of SO2 are being made. Major processes related to FGD tech- from flue gases by NH3 injection have been conducted, nologies include water scrubbing, metal ion solutions, there is disagreement on the operating condition (such as catalytic oxidation, dry or semidry adsorption, wet lime temperature) that a high removal efficiency can be or limestone scrubbing, double alkali process, and ammonia obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Platinum-Group Elements and Gold in Sulfide Melts from Modern Arc Basalt (Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Platinum-group elements and gold in sulfide melts from modern arc basalt (Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka) M. Zelenski, V.S. Kamenetsky, J.A. Mavrogenes, L.V. Danyushevsky, D. Matveev, A.A. Gurenko PII: S0024-4937(17)30290-6 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2017.08.012 Reference: LITHOS 4395 To appear in: LITHOS Received date: 30 May 2017 Accepted date: 21 August 2017 Please cite this article as: Zelenski, M., Kamenetsky, V.S., Mavrogenes, J.A., Danyu- shevsky, L.V., Matveev, D., Gurenko, A.A., Platinum-group elements and gold in sul- fide melts from modern arc basalt (Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka), LITHOS (2017), doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2017.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Platinum-group elements and gold in sulfide melts from modern arc basalt (Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka) M. Zelenski a, V.S. Kamenetsky a,b,*, J.A. Mavrogenes c, L.V. Danyushevsky b, D. Matveev d, A.A. Gurenko e a Institute of Experimental Mineralogy RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia b Earth Sciences and CODES, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia c Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia d Institute of Solid State Physics RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia e Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques (CRPG), UMR 7358, Université de Lorraine, 54501 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France * Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Determination of Sulfate and Sulfide Sulfur in Rocks Or Minerals
    The Determination of Sulfate and Sulfide Sulfur in Rocks or Minerals By ANGELINA C. VLISIDIS CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOCHEMISTRY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1214-D UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_____--__-___-_______-__---____,__-_-__-_---_-_______-_- Dl Introduction. ______________________________________________________ 1 Preparations. _________._.-.__-_-.__.._-_---__----.________._.._____ 2 Standard samples____________________________________________ 2 Reagents. _______________.-_-___-____-__-_-__-_-___-_______-_- 2 Procedure._______________________________________________________ 2 Results__ __________-______-_____----__--_--_----_-_-_-___-___--_ 3 References.._ _____________________________________________________ 5 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Results of sulfide and sulfate sulfur analyses in which varying amounts of a sulfate standard were added to sulfide minerals.. _ D4 m 209-517 66 CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOCHEMISTRY THE DETERMINATION OF SULFATE AND SULFIDE SULFUR IN ROCKS OR MINERALS By ANGELINA C. VLISEDIS , ABSTRACT A method for the determination of sulfate and sulfide sulfur that occur together in rocks or minerals is presented. All the sulfate sulfur is converted to barium sulfate in an inert atmosphere to prevent oxidation of any sulfide sulfur. Cadmium chloride is added to precipitate any sulfide ion that may be liberated. The sulfate sulfur is then measured indirectly by the determination of the barium and is therefore unaffected by any. subsequent oxidation of the sulfide sulfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitration of Naphthalene and Remarks on the Mechanism of Electrophilic Aromatic Nitration* (Two-Step Mechanism) GEORGE A
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 3298-3300, June 1981 Chemistry Nitration of naphthalene and remarks on the mechanism of electrophilic aromatic nitration* (two-step mechanism) GEORGE A. OLAH, SUBHASH C. NARANG, AND JUDITH A. OLAH Institute of Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007 Contributed by George A. Olah, March 2, 1981 ABSTRACT Naphthalene was nitrated with a variety of ni- Table 1. Nitration of naphthalene with various nitrating agents trating agents. Comparison of data with Perrin's electrochemical nitration [Perrin, C. L. (1977)J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 5516-5518] a/p shows that nitration of naphthalene gives an a-nitronaphthalene Temp, isomer to fi-nitronaphthalene ratio that varies between 9 and 29 and is Reagent Solvent OC ratio Ref. thus not constant. Perrin's data, therefore, are considered to be NO2BF4 Sulfolane 25 10 * inconclusive evidence for the proposed one-electron transfer NO2BF4 Nitromethane 25 12 mechanism for the nitration of naphthalene and other reactive HNO3 Nitromethane 25 29 1 aromatics. Moodie and Schoefield [Hoggett, J. G., Moodie, R. B., HNO3 Acetic acid 25 21 1 Penton, J. R. & Schoefield, K. (1971) Nitration andAromatic Reac- HNO3 Acetic acid 50 16 1 tivity (Cambridge Univ. Press, London)], as well as Perrin, in- HNO3 Sulfuric acid 70 22 1 dependently concluded that, in the general scheme of nitration of HNO3 Acetic 25 9 reactive aromatics, there is the necessity to introduce into the clas- anhydride sical Ingold mechanism an additional step involving a distinct in- CH30NOjCH3OSO2F Acetonitrile 25 13 * termediate preceding the formation ofthe Wheland intermediate AgNO3/CH3COCI Acetonitrile 25 12 * (o complexes).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G Acid Dissociation Constants
    harxxxxx_App-G.qxd 3/8/10 1:34 PM Page AP11 APPENDIX G Acid Dissociation Constants §␮ ϭ 0.1 M 0 ؍ (Ionic strength (␮ † ‡ † Name Structure* pKa Ka pKa ϫ Ϫ5 Acetic acid CH3CO2H 4.756 1.75 10 4.56 (ethanoic acid) N ϩ H3 ϫ Ϫ3 Alanine CHCH3 2.344 (CO2H) 4.53 10 2.33 ϫ Ϫ10 9.868 (NH3) 1.36 10 9.71 CO2H ϩ Ϫ5 Aminobenzene NH3 4.601 2.51 ϫ 10 4.64 (aniline) ϪO SNϩ Ϫ4 4-Aminobenzenesulfonic acid 3 H3 3.232 5.86 ϫ 10 3.01 (sulfanilic acid) ϩ NH3 ϫ Ϫ3 2-Aminobenzoic acid 2.08 (CO2H) 8.3 10 2.01 ϫ Ϫ5 (anthranilic acid) 4.96 (NH3) 1.10 10 4.78 CO2H ϩ 2-Aminoethanethiol HSCH2CH2NH3 —— 8.21 (SH) (2-mercaptoethylamine) —— 10.73 (NH3) ϩ ϫ Ϫ10 2-Aminoethanol HOCH2CH2NH3 9.498 3.18 10 9.52 (ethanolamine) O H ϫ Ϫ5 4.70 (NH3) (20°) 2.0 10 4.74 2-Aminophenol Ϫ 9.97 (OH) (20°) 1.05 ϫ 10 10 9.87 ϩ NH3 ϩ ϫ Ϫ10 Ammonia NH4 9.245 5.69 10 9.26 N ϩ H3 N ϩ H2 ϫ Ϫ2 1.823 (CO2H) 1.50 10 2.03 CHCH CH CH NHC ϫ Ϫ9 Arginine 2 2 2 8.991 (NH3) 1.02 10 9.00 NH —— (NH2) —— (12.1) CO2H 2 O Ϫ 2.24 5.8 ϫ 10 3 2.15 Ϫ Arsenic acid HO As OH 6.96 1.10 ϫ 10 7 6.65 Ϫ (hydrogen arsenate) (11.50) 3.2 ϫ 10 12 (11.18) OH ϫ Ϫ10 Arsenious acid As(OH)3 9.29 5.1 10 9.14 (hydrogen arsenite) N ϩ O H3 Asparagine CHCH2CNH2 —— —— 2.16 (CO2H) —— —— 8.73 (NH3) CO2H *Each acid is written in its protonated form.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name: SELENIUM SULFIDE HAZARD SUMMARY
    Common Name: SELENIUM SULFIDE CAS Number: 7446-34-6 RTK Substance number: 1653 DOT Number: UN 2657 Date: October 1995 Revision: October 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- HAZARD SUMMARY * Selenium Sulfide can affect you when breathed in and by * If you think you are experiencing any work-related health passing through your skin. problems, see a doctor trained to recognize occupational * Selenium Sulfide should be handled as a CARCINOGEN- diseases. Take this Fact Sheet with you. -WITH EXTREME CAUTION. * Contact can irritate the eyes with possible eye damage. WORKPLACE EXPOSURE LIMITS * Breathing Selenium Sulfide can irritate the nose and The following exposure limits are for Selenium compounds throat. (measured as Selenium): * High exposure may cause headache, nausea, vomiting, garlic odor of the breath, metallic taste and coated tongue. OSHA: The legal airborne permissible exposure limit * Repeated exposure can cause pallor, nervousness and (PEL) is 0.2 mg/m3 averaged over an 8-hour mood changes. workshift. * Selenium Sulfide may damage the liver and kidneys. NIOSH: The recommended airborne exposure limit is IDENTIFICATION 0.2 mg/m3 averaged over a 10-hour workshift. Selenium Sulfide is a bright orange powder. It is used in medicated shampoos. ACGIH: The recommended airborne exposure limit is 3 0.2 mg/m averaged over an 8-hour workshift. REASON FOR CITATION * Selenium Sulfide is on the Hazardous Substance List * Selenium Sulfide may be a CARCINOGEN in humans. because it is regulated by OSHA and cited by ACGIH, There may be no safe level of exposure to a carcinogen, so DOT, NIOSH, NTP, DEP, HHAG and EPA. all contact should be reduced to the lowest possible level.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociation Constants and Ph-Titration Curves at Constant Ionic Strength from Electrometric Titrations in Cells Without Liquid
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS RESEARCH PAPER RP1537 Part of Journal of Research of the N.ational Bureau of Standards, Volume 30, May 1943 DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS AND pH-TITRATION CURVES AT CONSTANT IONIC STRENGTH FROM ELECTRO­ METRIC TITRATIONS IN CELLS WITHOUT LIQUID JUNCTION : TITRATIONS OF FORMIC ACID AND ACETIC ACID By Roger G. Bates, Gerda L. Siegel, and S. F. Acree ABSTRACT An improved method for obtaining the titration curves of monobasic acids is outlined. The sample, 0.005 mole of the sodium salt of the weak acid, is dissolver! in 100 ml of a 0.05-m solution of sodium chloride and titrated electrometrically with an acid-salt mixture in a hydrogen-silver-chloride cell without liquid junction. The acid-salt mixture has the composition: nitric acid, 0.1 m; pot assium nitrate, 0.05 m; sodium chloride, 0.05 m. The titration therefore is performed in a. medium of constant chloride concentration and of practically unchanging ionic­ strength (1'=0.1) . The calculations of pH values and of dissociation constants from the emf values are outlined. The tit ration curves and dissociation constants of formic acid and of acetic acid at 25 0 C were obtained by this method. The pK values (negative logarithms of the dissociation constants) were found to be 3.742 and 4. 754, respectively. CONTENTS Page I . Tntroduction __ _____ ~ __ _______ . ______ __ ______ ____ ________________ 347 II. Discussion of the titrat ion metbod __ __ ___ ______ _______ ______ ______ _ 348 1. Ti t;at~on. clU,:es at constant ionic strength from cells without ltqUld JunctlOlL - - - _ - __ _ - __ __ ____ ____ _____ __ _____ ____ __ _ 349 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfuric Acid
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN 19 Motivation Dve Wangara, WA, 6065 AUSTRALIA T +61 8 9302 4000 | FREE 1800 999 196 | F +61 8 9302 5000 SULFURIC ACID MATERIAL & FUNCTION General: Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4) (also spelled Sulphuric Acid) is a strong mineral acid used in many industrial processes as well as batteries. It is one of the largest inorganic industrial chemicals produced by tonnage. The quantity of sulfuric acid produced has been used as an indicator of a country’s industrial status. Uses: Sulfuric acid is one of the most important industrial chemicals. More of it is made each year than is made of any other manufactured chemical. It has widely varied uses and plays some part in the production of nearly all manufactured goods. The major use of sulfuric acid is in the production of fertilizers, e.g., superphosphate of lime and ammonium sulfate. Sulfuric acid is a strong acid used as an intermediate in the synthesis of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactants used in dyes, in petroleum refining, for the nitration of explosives, in the manufacture of nitrocellulose, in caprolactam manufacturing, as the electrolyte in lead-acid batteries, and as a drying agent for chlorine and nitric acid It is used in petroleum refining to wash impurities out of gasoline and other refinery products. Sulfuric acid is used in processing metals, e.g., in pickling (cleaning) iron and steel before plating them with tin or zinc. Rayon is made with sulfuric acid. It serves as the electrolyte in the lead-acid storage battery commonly used in motor vehicles (acid for this use, containing about 33% H2SO4 and with specific gravity about 1.25, is often called battery acid).
    [Show full text]
  • Is Selenium a Metal, Non-Metal Or Metalloid?
    Is Selenium a metal, non-metal or metalloid? Abstract Is selenium(Se) a metal, non-metal, or a metalloid? There are various public opinions circulating around it. Since a long time from now, there are a lot of voices discussing this. Even until now, there is still no consensus about it. So, in this project, we are trying to find out whether selenium is a non-metal, metal or metalloids base on its physical and chemical properties which could be studied in the secondary school combining with the other information from the internet. Principles and hypothesis Studied from the secondary school chemistry, the general properties of metals include being good conductors of heat and electricity, having high melting and boiling points. Non-metals generally have a lower melting point and boiling point than metals and they being poor conductors of heat and electricity, etc. And the physical properties of metalloids are having extremely high melting/ boiling point, and having fair electrical conductivity. On the other hand, the oxides of metal are generally basic whereas the oxide of non-metals and metalloids are generally acidic. We will define selenium’s chemical category based on the above properties. Besides, we would like to introduce the concept of displacement reaction in studying the chemical properties of the chalcogens(e.g. sulphur(S) and selenium(Se)), especially selenium such rarely mentioned element. We can assume selenium is a metal if selenium could displace a metal oxide or a metal could displace selenium (IV) oxide. If selenium is a non-metal, its oxide could be displaced by sulphur which is supposed to be more reactive than selenium in the chalcogen group.
    [Show full text]