Reactions of Sulfur Dioxide with Ammonia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reactions of Sulfur Dioxide with Ammonia 環境 科 学 会 誌6(2):143-150(1993) 143 Reactions of Sulfur Dioxide with Ammonia Kouichi HIROTA*, Toshiaki NIINA**, Erry ANWAR*** Hideki NAMBA*, Okihiro TOKUNAGA* and Yoneho TABATA Abstract Reactions of SO2 with NH3 were studied at 45-105•Ž in gaseous mixture of NO, oxygen and nitrogen with and without water. The reactions proceed at reaction temperature lower than 65•Ž in the presence of 10% water and white powdery reaction products were uniformly deposited on the surface of a reactor and of a fiber filter. From the chemical analysis of the products dissolved in water, the main components of the products were considered to be ammonium sulfate, sulfite, hydrogen sulfate and hydrogen sulfite. The reactions may proceed in absorbed water on the surface of a reactor and a fiber filter. Key Words : sulfur dioxide, ammonia, reaction, reaction temperature, relative humid ity ably affected by gaseous components and reac 1. Introduction tion temperature. Irradiation with electron beam was proposed In this report, we studied on reactions of SO2 as an effective method for removing NOX and with NH3 in gaseous mixture of which compo SO2 in flue gases from industrial plants such as nents were colse to that of coal-fired flue gas to power stations, steel plants, etc. In this proc- clarify the characteristics of the reactions and ess, electron beam irradiation in the presence of to evaluate the contribution of the reactions in ammonia added causes conversions of NOX and SO2 removal in electron beam treatment of SO2 to aerosol of ammonium nitrate and sulfate coal-fired flue gas. which can be collected by an electrostatic 2. Experimental precipitator or by a bag filter1•`3). We found a part of SO2 was removed through reactions 2.1 Materials with NH3 without electron beam irradiation in Nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and 1 or this process, but the mechanism of this reaction 3% SO2,1 or 3% NH3 and 3000 ppm NO diluted was not clear. with nitrogen were used as purchased from the Studies on reactions of SO2 with NH3 have Nippon Sanso Company without further purifi been done in 1960's and 70's4•`10). These studies cation. Purities of all these gases and gaseous mainly focused on the aerosol formation at compounds were above 99.9%. around room temperature in the presence of a 2.2 Apparatus trace amount of water and the results of these Experiments were carried out using a flow studies showed that the reactions were remark experimental system shown in Fig. 1. A cylin - Received December 1, 1992 ; Accepted February 12, 1993 * Department of Radiation Research for Environment and Resources, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 1233 Watanuki, Takasaki, Gunma 370-12, Japan. ** Department of Engineering, the University of Takai. *** Center for the Application of Isotope and Radiation, National Atomic Energy Agency , Indonesia. 144 HIROTA, NIINA, ANWAR, NAMRA, TOKUNAGA and TABATA Fig. 1 Apparatus drical reaction vessel made of Pyrex-glass of 33 The temperature of the line A was set to be 2- cm long and 8 cm diameter was placed in a 3•Ž higher than that of the water bath to pre- thermostatic oven. A sheet of fiber filter was vent condensation of water vapor in the line placed at down-stream position of the vessel to and the line B was heated to be 115•Ž not to collect powdery reaction products. The flow proceed reactions of SO2 with NH3 in the line. rates of nitrogen, oxygen, 1 or 3% SO2 and 3000 The measurement of SO2 concentration was ppm NO were individually controlled using done by an infra-red absorpion type SO2 detec each flow control valve and these gases were tor (Shimazdu : IRA 107). Before introducing passed into a mixing vessel of same size as the the sample gas into the detector, the sample gas reaction vessel through each pipe. All pipes of 1 1/min was led into a filter to remove which were used for connection between instru powdery products and then into an ammonia ment parts were made of Teflon. The mixing scrubber in which glass fiber soaked with con vessel was filled with a lot of glass-made cylin centrated phosphoric acid was set to remove drical rings of 25 mm long and 12 mm diameter NH3. and was placed just before the reaction vessel in 2.3 Procedure the oven. On the way to the mixing vessel The temperature of the oven was first set to from the flow control valve, nitrogen was be 105•Ž, and all gaseous components other introduced into water of which temperature than 1 or 3% NH3 were continuously fed into was controlled in a water bath (Eyela : Digital the reactor through the mixing vessel. When Uni Ace UA-100) to prepare water-saturated the indication of SO2 concentration was stable, nitrogen and the nitrogen was then led into the 1 or 3% NH3 was directly introduced into the mixing vessel through a heated pipe to mix with reactor where reactions of SO2 with NH3 were other gaseous components. On the other hand, initiated accompanying the change of the indi 1 or 3% NH3 was directly introduced into the cation of SO2 concentration. When the indica reactor, where NH3 reacted with SO2. Reac tion of SO2 concentration was stable at the tion temperature was detected by a thermocou temperature of the oven of 105•Ž, the tempera ple detector (CA) inserted into the reactor. ture of the oven was changed to 100•Ž. The The temperatures of line A and B in Fig. l were same procedure was done to get the stable controlled by each temperature controller. indication of SO2 concentration resulting from 145 Reactions of S02 with NH3 reactions with NH3 at every temperature from 105 to 45•Ž at 5•Ž intervals. Typical total flow rate of gaseous mixture was 101/min and typi cal reaction time of the gas in the reactor was 10 sec. 2.4 Analysis of products White powdery products deposited on the inner surface of the reactor were washed with distilled water of about 100 ml to dissolve. A part of the water solution was used for analysis of NH4+, SO32- and SO42- ions by an ion chromatograph (Toyo Soda Industry Co. Ltd. : HLC-601). The analytical conditions for these ions were as follows ; For SO42- and 5032-: column TSK gel IC-Anion PW Fig. 2 Effect of H2O on NH3-SO2 Reac tion (Toyo Soda Industry) Initial Concentration of Water ; eluent 10% acetonitrile 0% (•œ), 3% (•¤), 5% (•›), 7% flow rate of eluent 1.2 ml/min (••), 10% (• ), 15% (•ž), 20% column temperature 40•Ž (•¢) detector conductivity initial Concentrations ; SO2 (600 For NH4+: ppm), NH3 (1200 ppm), NO (225 column TSK gel IC-Cation ppm), 02 (10%) and N2 (Balance) (Toyo Soda Industry) eluent 2 mM HNO3 flow rate of eluent 1.2 ml/min column temperature 40•Ž detector conductivity 3. Results and Discussion When SO2 was mixed with NH3 in the gase ous mixture of NO, oxygen, water and nitrogen, SO2 concentration was decreased gradually accompanying the formation of white powdery products on the surface of the vessel and the filter at the temperature lower than a certain value. In this report, the degree of reactions of SO2 with NH3 was indicated by removal of SO2 (1-[SO2]/[SO2]o, where [SO2]o and [SO2] were SO2 concentrations before and after the reactions in gaseous mixture). Fig. 3 Relationship between Water Con 3.1 Dependency of reaction temperature centration and SO2 Removal on NH3-SO2 Reaction Dependency of reaction temperature on SO2 Reaction Temperature (•Ž) ; 45 removal in the gaseous mixture of 600 ppm SO2, (•›), 50 (• ), 55 (•ž), 60 (•¢), 65 1200 ppm NH3, 225 ppm NO, 10% oxygen and (•¤), 70 (••) nitrogen (balance) was shown in Fig. 2 for Initial Concentrations ; SO2 (600 various concentrations of water ranging from 0 ppm), NH3 (1200 ppm), NO (225 to 20%. It should be pointed out from the ppm), 03 (10%) and N2 (Balance) 146 HIROTA, MINA, ANWAR, MAMBA, TOKUNAGA and TABATA figure that no SO2 removal was observed with- out water. While in the presence of water, SO2 removal was observed at reaction temperature lower than a certain value and was increased almost linearly with lowering the temperature. The highest temperature at which SO2 removal was observed is hereinafter named as "the highest reaction temperature" in this report. "The highest reaction temperature" was lower with lowering concentration of water in gase ous mixture and was determined to be 71•Ž and 55•Ž at the water concentration of 20% and 3%, respectively. The figure 3 showed relationship between SO2 removal and water concentration at various reaction temperatures, which indicat ed clearly remarkable dependency of water concentration and reaction temperature on Fig. 5 Effect of SO2 Concentration on NH3-SO2 Reaction reactions of SO2 with NH3. 3.2 Dependency of reaction time Initial Concentration of NH3 ; 1200 ppm (•›) and 1600 ppm (• ) Effect of reaction time on reactions of SO2 Initial Concentrations ; NO (225 with NH3 was studied at the reaction tempera ppm), O2 (10%), H2O (10%) and ture of 50•Ž in the gaseous mixture of 600 ppm N2 (Balance). SO2, 1200 ppm NH3, 225 ppm NO, 5% water, Reaction Temperature; 50•Ž 10% oxygen and nitrogen (balance). The obtained relationship between reaction time and SO2 removal was shown in Fig. 4. SO2 removal rate (SO2 removal/sec) was calcu lated to be 5.4%/sec at the initial stage of the reactions and was gradually decreased with reaction time. The results suggest that the reactions are affected by concentrations of SO2 and/or NH3 in gaseous mixture.
Recommended publications
  • Enhanced Heterogeneous Uptake of Sulfur Dioxide on Mineral Particles Through Modification of Iron Speciation During Simulated Cloud Processing
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12569–12585, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12569-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Enhanced heterogeneous uptake of sulfur dioxide on mineral particles through modification of iron speciation during simulated cloud processing Zhenzhen Wang1, Tao Wang1, Hongbo Fu1,2,3, Liwu Zhang1, Mingjin Tang4, Christian George5, Vicki H. Grassian6, and Jianmin Chen1 1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China 2Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China 4State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China 5University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, IRCELYON, 69626, Villeurbanne, France 6Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA Correspondence: Hongbo Fu ([email protected]) and Jianmin Chen ([email protected]) Received: 7 May 2019 – Discussion started: 5 June 2019 Revised: 7 August 2019 – Accepted: 5 September 2019 – Published: 9 October
    [Show full text]
  • SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content
    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994,33, 1231-1236 1231 SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content Hsunling Bai' Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Chiao- Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, R.O.C. Pratim Biswas and Tim C. Keener Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 -0071 The removal of SO2 by NH3 gas injection at various temperatures and moisture contents has been studied experimentally. The product compositions of the NH3-SO2-HzO vapor reactions were also reported. A thermodynamic analysis was carried out to predict the SO2 removal as well as the product compositions. Both the experimental results and thermodynamic analysis indicated that SO2 removal and the product compositions are sensitive to the reaction temperature. Moisture content, once in large excess of the stoichiometric requirement, does not have a strong effect on the product compositions but plays an important role in the SO2 removal. Introduction conditions. Stromberger (1984) used X-ray diffraction and identified the product particles to be (NH&S04 Sulfur dioxide removal from flue gases is a goal of many crystals. air pollution engineers. Significant efforts in the develop- ment of new flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies Although a number of studies on the removal of SO2 are being made. Major processes related to FGD tech- from flue gases by NH3 injection have been conducted, nologies include water scrubbing, metal ion solutions, there is disagreement on the operating condition (such as catalytic oxidation, dry or semidry adsorption, wet lime temperature) that a high removal efficiency can be or limestone scrubbing, double alkali process, and ammonia obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
    The information presented here reflects EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2002. The Agency is in the process of updating this information to reflect modifications included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003. The revised information will be posted on the Agency's Clear Skies Web site (www.epa.gov/clearskies) as soon as possible. Overview of the Human Health and Environmental Effects of Power Generation: Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Mercury (Hg) June 2002 Contents The Clear Skies Initiative is intended to reduce the health and environmental impacts of power generation. This document briefly summarizes the health and environmental effects of power generation, specifically those associated with sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), and mercury (Hg). This document does not address the specific impacts of the Clear Skies Initiative. • Overview -- Emissions and transport • Fine Particles • Ozone (Smog) • Visibility • Acid Rain • Nitrogen Deposition • Mercury Photo Credits: 1: USDA; EPA; EPA; VTWeb.com 2: NADP 6: EPA 7: ?? 10: EPA 2 Electric Power Generation: Major Source of Emissions 2000 Sulfur Dioxide 2000 Nitrogen Oxides 1999 Mercury Fuel Combustion- Industrial Processing electric utilities Transportation Other stationary combustion * Miscellaneous * Other stationary combustion includes residential and commercial sources. • Power generation continues to be an important source of these major pollutants. • Power generation contributes 63% of SO2, 22% of NOX, and 37% of man-made mercury to the environment. 3 Overview of SO2, NOX, and Mercury Emissions, Transport, and Transformation • When emitted into the atmosphere, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury undergo chemical reactions to form compounds that can travel long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Gas. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 012833 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture EYE IRRITATION - Category 2A TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION - Category 1 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. Causes serious eye irritation. May damage fertility or the unborn child. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Obtain special instructions before use. Wear protective gloves. Wear protective clothing. Wear eye or face protection. Wash thoroughly after handling. Response : IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice or attention.
    [Show full text]
  • SDS # : 014869 Supplier's Details : Airgas USA, LLC and Its Affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Sulfur Dioxide Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Gas. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 014869 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Not applicable. Response : Not applicable. Storage : Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. Disposal : Not applicable. Hazards not otherwise : In addition to any other important health or physical hazards, this product may displace classified oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Section 3. Composition/information on ingredients Substance/mixture : Mixture Other means of : Not available.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Chalcogen Chemistry
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHALCOGEN CHEMISTRY Tristram Chivers Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada WHERE IS CALGARY? Lecture 1: Background / Introduction Outline • Chalcogens (O, S, Se, Te, Po) • Elemental Forms: Allotropes • Uses • Trends in Atomic Properties • Spin-active Nuclei; NMR Spectra • Halides as Reagents • Cation Formation and Stabilisation • Anions: Structures • Solutions of Chalcogens in Ionic Liquids • Oxides and Imides: Multiple Bonding 3 Elemental Forms: Sulfur Allotropes Sulfur S6 S7 S8 S10 S12 S20 4 Elemental Forms: Selenium and Tellurium Allotropes Selenium • Grey form - thermodynamically stable: helical structure cf. plastic sulfur. R. Keller, et al., Phys. Rev. B. 1977, 4404. • Red form - cyclic Cyclo-Se8 (cyclo-Se7 and -Se6 also known). Tellurium • Silvery-white, metallic lustre; helical structure, cf. grey Se. • Cyclic allotropes only known entrapped in solid-state structures e.g. Ru(Ten)Cl3 (n = 6, 8, 9) M. Ruck, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6382 5 Uses – Sulfur Sulfur : Occurs naturally in underground deposits. • Recovered by Frasch process (superheated water). • H2S in sour gas (> 70%): Recovered by Klaus process: Klaus Process: 2 H S + SO 3/8 S + 2 H O 2 2 8 2 • Primary industrial use (70 %): H2SO4 in phosphate fertilizers 6 Uses – Selenium and Tellurium Selenium and Tellurium : Recovered during the refining of copper sulfide ores Selenium: • Photoreceptive properties – used in photocopiers (As2Se3) • Imparts red color in glasses Tellurium: • As an alloy with Cu, Fe, Pb and to harden
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Sulfur Aerosol-Forming Mechanism
    Elemental sulfur aerosol-forming mechanism Manoj Kumara and Joseph S. Franciscoa,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588 Contributed by Joseph S. Francisco, December 21, 2016 (sent for review November 13, 2016; reviewed by James Lyons and Hua-Gen Yu) Elemental sulfur aerosols are ubiquitous in the atmospheres of Venus, reaction mechanism that may possibly convert the SOn + nH2S ancient Earth, and Mars. There is now an evolving body of evidence (n = 1, 2, 3) chemistries into the S8 aerosol in the gas phase suggesting that these aerosols have also played a role in the evolution (Scheme S1). It is the thermodynamics of these processes, and of early life on Earth. However, the exact details of their formation their catalysis by water and sulfuric acid, that we investigate here. mechanism remain an open question. The present theoretical calcula- This mechanism may not only help in better understanding the tions suggest a chemical mechanism that takes advantage of the in- role of sulfur cycle involving SOn,S8, and H2S as the potential S n = teraction between sulfur oxides, SOn ( 1, 2, 3) and hydrogen sulfide MIF carrier from the atmosphere to the ocean surface, but may 0 (nH2S), resulting in the efficient formation of a Sn+1 particle. Interest- also provide deeper insight into the formation mechanism of S + → + ingly, the SOn nH2S Sn+1 nH2O reactions occur via low-energy aerosols in various other environments. pathways under water or sulfuric acid catalysis. Once the S + particles n 1 We first explored the uncatalyzed gas-phase reactions of SOn with are formed, they may further nucleate to form larger polysulfur aero- nH2S using quantum-chemical calculations at the coupled cluster sols, thus providing a chemical framework for understanding the for- single and double substitution method with a perturbative treatment 0 mation mechanism of S aerosols in different environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical and Preservative Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solution for Brining Fruit
    The Chemical and Preservative Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solution for Brining Fruit Circular of Information 629 June 1969 Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis The Chemical and Preservative Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solution for Brining Fruit C. H. PAYNE, D. V. BEAVERS, and R. F. CAIN Department of Food Science and Technology Sweet cherries and other fruits are preserved in sul- control are given in papers by Waiters et al. (1963) and fur dioxide solutions for manufacture into maraschino, Yang et al. (1966). cocktail, and glace fruit. The sulfur dioxide solution, Sulfur dioxide and calcium are directly related to commonly called brine, may be prepared from liquid brined cherry quality. Improper use of these chemicals sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite, or sodium metabisulfite may result in cherries that are soft, poorly bleached, or using alkali or acid to control pH. Calcium salts such as spoiled due to fermentation. It is the purpose of this calcium hydroxide, calcium carbonate, and calcium chlo- circular to show how the basic chemical and preservative ride are added to the brine to prevent cracking and pro- components of brine solutions are afifected during prep- mote firming of the fruit tissue through interaction with aration, storage, and use. pectic materials. Directions for brine preparation and Chemical Properties of Sulfur Dioxide Solutions When sulfur dioxide or materials containing sulfur range of sulfur dioxide concentrations, the relative dis- dioxide (bisulfite or metabisulfite) are dissolved in tribution of the sulfur dioxide ionic forms is constant. water, three types of chemical substances are formed: Within the initial pH range used for brining cher- sulfurous acid (H2SO3),1 bisulfite (HSO3"), and sulfite ries, there is a predominance of calcium bisulfite (SO~).
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Dioxide / Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Propane / Sulfur Dioxide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Carbon Dioxide / Carbon Monoxide / Nitric Oxide / Nitrogen / Propane / Sulfur Dioxide Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Gas. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 019536 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. May increase respiration and heart rate. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Not applicable. Response : Not applicable. Storage : Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. Disposal : Not applicable. Hazards not otherwise : In addition to any other important health or physical hazards, this product may displace classified oxygen and cause rapid suffocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Structure, Stability, and Cooperativity of Chalcogen Bonding in Sulfur Dioxide and Hydrated Sulfur Dioxide Clusters
    Electronic structure, stability, and cooperativity of chalcogen bonding in sulfur dioxide and hydrated sulfur dioxide clusters: a DFT study and wave functional analysis Venkataramanan Natarajan Sathiyamoorthy ( [email protected] ) SHARP Substratum https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-0894 Research Article Keywords: Chalcogen bond, Hydrogen bond, Non-covalent interactions, QTAIM, Cooperativity Posted Date: July 7th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665149/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/28 Abstract Density functional theory calculations and wave functional analysis are used to examine the (SO2)n and (SO2)n–H2O clusters with n = 1–7. The nature of interactions is explored by molecular electrostatic potentials, electron density distribution, atoms in molecules, noncovalent interaction, and energy decomposition analysis. The putative global minimum of SO2 molecules has a 3D growth pattern with tetrahedral. In the hydrated SO2 clusters, the pure hydrogen bond isomers are less stable than the O···S chalcogen bond isomers. The cluster absorption energy of SO2 on water increases with the size of sulfur dioxide, implying reactivity of sulfur dioxide with water increases with size. The presence of cooperativity was evident from the excellent linearity plot of binding energy/polarizability vs the number of SO2 molecules. Molecular electrostatic potential analysis elucidates the reason for the facile formation of S···O chalcogen than hydrogen bonding in hydrated sulfur dioxide. Atoms in molecule analysis characterize the bonds chalcogen and H bonds to be weak and electrostatic dominant. EDA analysis shows electrostatic interaction is dominated in complexes with more intermolecular chalcogen bonding and orbital interaction for systems with intermolecular H-bonding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxidation of Sulfur(IV) by Reaction with Iron(III): a Critical Review and Data Analysis Cite This: Phys
    PCCP View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue The oxidation of sulfur(IV) by reaction with iron(III): a critical review and data analysis Cite this: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20,4020 Peter Warneck The dependences on ionic strength of the hydrolysis constants of Fe3+ and of the first dissociation constant of sulfurous acid are briefly reviewed. The data are needed to derive from apparent stability constants reported in the literature the stability constants for the three iron–sulfito complexes defined 2+ À + + À À + by the equilibria (c1) FeOH + HSO3 = FeSO3 +H2O, (c2) FeSO3 + HSO3 = Fe(SO3)2 +H , (c3a) À À 2À 3 À1 Fe(SO3)2 + HSO3 = Fe(SO3)3H , where Kc1 = 1982 Æ 518 dm mol , Kc2 = 0.72 Æ 0.08, Kc3a = 189 Æ 9dm3 molÀ1 (ionic strength m = 0.1 mol dmÀ3). The rapid formation of these complexes is followed by À a slower decomposition leading to the formation of SO3 radicals; the associated rate coefficients are À1 À1 À1 k1 =0.19s , k1a E 0.04 s ,andk1b E 0.08 s , respectively. The subsequent reaction leads to dithionate and sulfate as products. Overall rates and product yields from a variety of studies of the slow reaction Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. are found to be consistent with a mechanism, in which the production of dithionate occurs mainly by the À + À 2+ 3+ reaction of SO3 with FeSO3 and that of sulfate by the reaction of SO3 with FeOH and/or Fe .Therole Received 9th November 2017, of copper as a catalyst is also analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMISTRY 1A NOMENCLATURE WORKSHEET Chemical Formula
    CHEMISTRY 1A NOMENCLATURE WORKSHEET Chemical Formula Nomenclature Practice: Complete these in lab and on your own time for practice. You should complete this by Sunday. Use the stock form for the transition metals. Give the formula for the following: 1. sulfur dioxide ____SO2______________ 26. methane ____CH4_____________ 2. sodium thiosulfate ____Na2S2O3__________ 27. copper (II) sulfate ____CuSO4___________ 3. ammonium phosphate ____(NH4)3PO4_________ 28. nitrogen dioxide ____NO2_____________ 4. potassium chlorate ____KClO3____________ 29. mercury (II) chloride ____HgCl2____________ 5. lithium hydroxide ____LiOH_____________ 30. tin (II) bromide ____SnBr2____________ 6. zinc nitrite ____Zn(NO2)2__________ 31. silver iodide ____AgI______________ 7. sodium sulfate ____Na2SO4____________ 32. magnesium bisulfite ____Mg(HSO3)2________ 8. cobalt (IV) bisulfite ____Co(HSO3)4_________ 33. carbon disulfide ____CS2______________ 9. cadmium nitrate ____Cd(NO3)2__________ 34. beryllium periodate ____Be(IO4)2__________ 10. nitric oxide ____NO_______________ 35. platinum (IV) cyanide ____Pt(CN)4___________ 11. hydrogen peroxide ____H2O2______________ 36. ammonia ____NH3______________ 12. carbon monoxide ____CO_______________ 37. dinitrogen oxide ____N2O______________ 13. silicon dioxide ____SiO2______________ 38. ferric oxide ____Fe2O3____________ 14. copper (I) bromide ____CuBr______________ 39. gold (III) chloride ____AuCl3____________ 15. iron (II) chromate ____FeCrO4____________ 40. strontium sulfide ____SrS______________ 16. mercury (I) fluoride
    [Show full text]