DOCSLIB.ORG

M Simps Indeptstudy Final Report(12-15-11)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M Simps Indeptstudy Final Report(12-15-11) Determining the potential distribution of highly invasive plants in the Carpathian Mountains of Ukraine: a species distribution modeling approach under different climate-land- use scenarios and possible implications for natural-resource management Maria Simpson Independent Graduate Project Report – December 2011 Johns Hopkins University – Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences Advanced Academic Programs – Environmental Sciences and Policy Supervisor: Dr. Bohdan Prots (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Ukraine and State Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences, Lviv, Ukraine) M. Simpson – Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i LIST OF FIGURES ii-iv LIST OF TABLES v ABSTRACT iv 1. INTRODUCTION 1-3 2. THE UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS 3 2.1 Geomorphology 3-5 2.2 Climate and hydrology 5-8 2.3 Vegetation 8-9 2.4 Land use and economic development 9-12 2.5 Importance of the UA Carpathians within the Carpathian Ecoregion 12 3. HIGHLY INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS 12 3.1 Invasiveness of non-native invasive plant species (NIPS) 12 3.1.1 Assessment of the invasiveness of NIPS in the UA Carpathians: 12-13 3.1.2 Ecology of NIPS: 13-17 3.1.3 Impacts of NIPS on ecosystems and humans: 17-19 3.2 Introduction pathways into and within the UA Carpathians 19 3.2.1 Human development and land use and NIPS: 19-22 3.2.2 Climate change and spread of NIPS: 23-25 4. SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELING 25 4.1 Ecological concepts 25 4.1.1 The ecological niche: 25-26 4.1.2 Equilibrium vs. non-equilibrium: 26-27 4.2 Modeling approaches 28-30 5. METHODS 30 5.1 Data requirements 30 5.1.1 Study area: 30-31 M. Simpson – Contents 5.1.2 Species presence data: 31-32 5.1.3 Predictor variables: 32-35 5.2 The modeling algorithms 35 5.2.1 Maximum Entropy – Maxent: 35-37 5.2.2 Biodiversity Modeling - BIOMOD: 37-39 5.3 Model evaluation 40-41 5.4 Variable importance 41 5.5 Climatic and land-use projections 41-42 5.6 Visual comparison of results 43 6. RESULTS 43 6.1 Accuracy of model predictions 43-44 6.2 Suitability predictions for current conditions 44-47 6.3 Importance of predictor variables 47-51 6.4 Potential species distribution under future projections 51-59 6.5 Maxent vs. BIOMOD 59-63 7. GENERAL IMPLICATIONS OF STUDY FOR NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 63-74 8. CONCLUSIONS 74-77 9. REFERENCES 78-85 APPENDICES Appendix A: Glossary – Definitions of Scientific Terms A1-A3 Appendix B: Ecology of the 11 Most Aggressive Non-Native Invasive Plant Species in the UA Carpathians A4-A18 Appendix C: Overview of BIOMOD Functions A19-A23 Appendix D: BIOMOD Best Model Based on AUC Values A24-A29 Appendix E: Predictions for Current Condition A30-A38 Appendix F: Measures of Variable Importance in Maxent and BIOMOD A39-A55 Appendix G: Projections for 2050 and 2100 Based on Change Scenarios A56-A91 M. Simpson – Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project which resulted in this report serves as my final graduate project for the Master of Science degree in Environmental Sciences and Policy at the Johns Hopkins University. It was carried out under supervision of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Danube-Carpathian Programme. Therefore, I thank, first and foremost, Dr. Bohdan Prots, Programme Coordinator of the WWF in Lviv and my direct project supervisor, for coordinating this unique and important study. Furthermore, my dearest thanks go out to the entire team at WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme and the State Museum of Natural History in Lviv for their hospitality, expertise, and inspiration they provided through their relentless determination to protect the natural heritage of the Carpathian Mountains. I also thank Dr. Ivan Kruhlov, Dr. Tobias Kuemmerle, and Dr. Patrick Hostert for allowing me to use their grid and vector maps on the Ukrainian Carpathians. Furthermore, I am grateful for the advice I received from Dr. Kruhlov and Dr. Yuriy Andreychuk on how to properly manipulate these datasets to get the GIS layers required for this study and for the expert opinion on species distribution modeling I received from Dr. Tobias Kuemmerle. Lastly, my gratitude goes to my dearest friend Isabel Marie Mitchell who patiently and competently reviewed my report drafts. i M. Simpson – List of Figures LIST OF FIGURES Main Text Figure 1: Physical map of the study area (Ukrainian Carpathians) within the Carpathian Mts. in Eastern Europe 4 Figure 2: Overview of A – geomorphological types and B – terrain/elevation within the Ukrainian Carpathians 4 Figure 3: Overview of A - main climatic zones and B – river networks of the Ukrainian Carpathians 7 Figure 4: Settlement locations and sizes in km2 in Western Ukraine 10 Figure 5: Urban-industrial development, tourism, and major transport routes in the Carpathians 11 Figure 6: Simplified depiction of the Enemy Release Hypothesis 14 Figure 7: Heracleum sosnowskyi invasion in species-rich meadow in the Ukrainian Carpathians 18 Figure 8: Cumulative impact of plant invasion 19 Figure 9: "Impacts of global change on invasion and associated processes" 25 Figure 10: Species Distribution Model (SDM) building process 29 Figure 11: Illustration of density distributions derived from two covariates (i.e., predictor variables) at presence locations and background samples 36 Figure 12: A schematic overview of the modeling processes occurring in BIOMOD 38 Figure 13: Confusion matrix 40 Figure 14: Measures of accuracy derived from the confusion matrix 40 Figure 15: Relative suitability for establishment of Acer negundo in the Ukrainian Carpathians determined by Maxent and BIOMOD best model (GMB) 44 Figure 16: Proportion of total area within the Ukrainian Carpathians predicted as suitable for establishment of invasive species with Maxent and BIOMOD best models 45 Figure 17: Overlap of Maxent and BIOMOD binary predictions of invasive plant distributions in the Ukrainian Carpathians 46 Figure 18: Spatial correlation between density of roads (polylines) and settlements (points) in the Ukrainian Carpathians and the areas predicted by Maxent to be highly suitable for all modeled invasive plant species 47 Figure 19: Maxent - contribution of predictor variables per invasive species for distribution models within the Ukrainian Carpathians 48 ii M. Simpson – List of Figures Figure 20: BIOMOD - contribution of predictor variables per invasive species for distribution models within the Ukrainian Carpathians 48 Figure 21: Maxent - contribution of predictor variables to model gain per invasive species for distribution models within the Ukrainian Carpathians 49 Figure 22: Boxplot of range change of suitable habitats for invasive plant species in the Ukrainian Carpathians across future change projections 52 Figure 23: Boxplot of range change of suitable habitats for invasive plant species in the Ukrainian Carpathians across study species 53 Figure 24: Spatial pattern of model predictions of suitable habitats in the Ukrainian Carpathians for Acer negundo and Echinocystis lobata based on current conditions and projections (to scenario iv) in BIOMOD 54 Figure 25: Maxent projections for scenarios i and ii (2050) of potential distribution of Robinia pseudoacacia in the Ukrainian Carpathians 55 Figure 26: Maxent projections for scenarios iii and iv (2100) of potential distribution of Robinia pseudoacacia in the Ukrainian Carpathians 55 Figure 27: Maxent projections for scenarios i and ii (2050) of potential distribution of Impatiens glandulifera in the Ukrainian Carpathians 56 Figure 28: Maxent projections for scenarios iii and iv (2100) of potential distribution of Impatiens glandulifera in the Ukrainian Carpathians 56 Figure 29: Overlap of binary predictions (at least 7 invasive study species) of suitable habitats for invasion within the Ukrainian Carpathians as projected by Maxent and BIOMOD under future climate and land-use change scenarios 58 Figure 30: Binary Maxent predictions of suitable habitat within the Ukrainian Carpathians for Helianthus tuberosus by 2100 59 Figure 31: Binary BIOMOD predictions of suitable habitat within the Ukrainian Carpathians for Helianthus tuberosus by 2100 60 Figure 32: Probability of presence of Acer negundo in the Ukrainian Carpathians as a function of maxtwarm (in °C x 10) while the remaining five predictor variables are held at their average value 61 Figure 33: BIOMOD-GBM projections of the potential distribution of Heracleum sosnowskyi in the Ukrainian Carpathians by 2100 62 Figure 34: The range of potential impact of non-native invasive plants on biodiversity in the Ukrainian Carpathians under current environmental conditions 64 iii M. Simpson – List of Figures Figure 35: The range of potential impact of non-native invasive plants on biodiversity in the Ukrainian Carpathians by 2100 assuming climate change and high economic development/ insufficient environmental protection 65 Figure 36: Suitable areas for establishment of Heracleum sosnowskyi populations in the Uzhanskyi National Nature Park (NNP) based on logistic modeling results in Maxent 67 Figure 37: Suitable areas for establishment of Heracleum sosnowskyi populations in the Uzhanskyi National Nature Park (NNP) based on binary modeling predictions in BIOMOD 68 Figure 38: Density of settlements and roads and suitable areas for establishment of Heracleum sosnowskyi populations in the Uzhanskyi National Nature Park (NNP) 69 Figure 39: The range of potential impact of highly invasive plants on biodiversity in the UA Carpathians (with a focus on the Transcarpathians) by 2050 assuming climate change and high economic development/insufficient environmental protection 72 Appendices
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impatiens Glandulifera (Himalayan Balsam) Chloroplast Genome Sequence As a Promising Target for Populations Studies
    Impatiens glandulifera (Himalayan balsam) chloroplast genome sequence as a promising target for populations studies Giovanni Cafa1, Riccardo Baroncelli2, Carol A. Ellison1 and Daisuke Kurose1 1 CABI Europe, Egham, Surrey, UK 2 University of Salamanca, Instituto Hispano-Luso de Investigaciones Agrarias (CIALE), Villamayor (Salamanca), Spain ABSTRACT Background: Himalayan balsam Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Balsaminaceae) is a highly invasive annual species native of the Himalayas. Biocontrol of the plant using the rust fungus Puccinia komarovii var. glanduliferae is currently being implemented, but issues have arisen with matching UK weed genotypes with compatible strains of the pathogen. To support successful biocontrol, a better understanding of the host weed population, including potential sources of introductions, of Himalayan balsam is required. Methods: In this molecular study, two new complete chloroplast (cp) genomes of I. glandulifera were obtained with low coverage whole genome sequencing (genome skimming). A 125-year-old herbarium specimen (HB92) collected from the native range was sequenced and assembled and compared with a 2-year-old specimen from UK field plants (HB10). Results: The complete cp genomes were double-stranded molecules of 152,260 bp (HB92) and 152,203 bp (HB10) in length and showed 97 variable sites: 27 intragenic and 70 intergenic. The two genomes were aligned and mapped with two closely related genomes used as references. Genome skimming generates complete organellar genomes with limited technical and financial efforts and produces large datasets compared to multi-locus sequence typing. This study demonstrates the 26 July 2019 Submitted suitability of genome skimming for generating complete cp genomes of historic Accepted 12 February 2020 Published 24 March 2020 herbarium material.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Genus Aconitum L. (Ranunculaceae Juss.) Is an Interesting Taxonomical Group Which Is Characterized by High Leve
    Modern Phytomorphology 9 (Suppl.): 35–73, 2016 SOME NOTES ON THE GENUS ACONITUM IN CHORNOHOra MTS. Andrew V. Novikoff 1*, Józef Mitka 2, Alexander Kuzyarin 1, Oleg Orlov 1, Marina Ragulina 1 Abstract. The paper is a contribution to ecology and chorology ofAconitum in high-mountain zone of the Ukrainian Carpathians. It was confirmed that genusAconitum in the Chornogora mountain range is represented by 14 taxa, and 7 more taxa were listed as potential for this region. These taxa belong to 3 subgenera and are divided on 4 main biomorphological groups delimited on the base of their habitat, life form, ecology and altitudinal distribution. The soil and vegetation types for all taxa have been identified and the maps of their distribution have been prepared. The most influent threats and their categories were identified. Threat category for A. × nanum was changed from DD to VU, and for A. firmum subsp. fussianum from NT to VU. Key words: Aconitum, Chornogora, sozology, ecology, chorology, soils, vegetation 1 State Natural History Museum NAS of Ukraine, Teatralna str. 18, 79008 Lviv, Ukraine; * [email protected] 2 Institute of Botany of Jagiellonian University, Botanical Garden, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31-501 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] Introduction (19 confirmed + 3 unconfirmedAconitum taxa) 9 species and subspecies are listed as clearly The genusAconitum L. (Ranunculaceae endemic or subendemic and 2 more hybrid Juss.) is an interesting taxonomical group which subspecies are considered as probably endemic is characterized by high level of morphological (Novikoff & Hurdu 2015). From other side, diversity, presence of a number of subspecific if we consider all forms and varieties then we taxa, and high number of both infra- and can tell about 17 subendemic and endemic taxa interspecific natural hybrids Gáyer( 1922; in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species Identification Guide
    Invasive Species Identification guides – Table of Contents Floating Pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides)……………………………….…………………………………2 Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum)…………………………………………………………………….4 Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera)………………………………………………………….…………….6 Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica)………………………………………………………………………………..8 New Zealand pigmyweed (Crassula helmsii)……………………………………………………………………….10 Water fern (Azolla filiculoides)……………………………………………………………………………………………12 This list is by no means exhaustive. Please refer to pages 233-237 of the Lincolnshire Biodiversity Action Plan (3rd Edition) for a list of priority non-native invasive species for our area. Floating pennywort Hydrocotyle ranunculoides Invasive species identification guide Where is it found? Floating on the surface or emerging from still or slowly moving freshwater. Can be free floating or rooted. Similar to…… Marsh pennywort (see bottom left photo) – this has a smaller more rounded leaf that attaches to the stem in the centre rather than between two lobes. Will always be rooted and never free floating. Key features Lobed leaves Fleshy green or red stems Floating or rooted Forms dense interwoven mats Leaf Leaves can be up to 7cm in diameter. Lobed leaves can float on or stand above the water. Marsh pennywort Roots Up to 5cm Fine white Stem attaches in roots centre More rounded leaf Floating pennywort Larger lobed leaf Stem attaches between lobes Photos © GBNNSS Workstream title goes here Invasive species ID guide: Floating pennywort Management Floating pennywort is extremely difficult to control due to rapid growth rates (up to 20cm from the bank each day). Chemical control: Can use glyphosphate but plant does not rot down very quickly after treatment so vegetation should be removed after two to three weeks in flood risk areas. Regular treatment necessary throughout the growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism
    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
    [Show full text]
  • Impatiens Glandulifera
    NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet Impatiens glandulifera Author of this fact sheet: Harry Helmisaari, SYKE (Finnish Environment Institute), P.O. Box 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland, Phone + 358 20 490 2748, E-mail: [email protected] Bibliographical reference – how to cite this fact sheet: Helmisaari, H. (2010): NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Impatiens glandulifera. – From: Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org, Date of access x/x/201x. Species description Scientific name: Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Balsaminaceae). Synonyms: Impatiens roylei Walpers. Common names: Himalayan balsam, Indian balsam, Policeman's Helmet (GB), Drüsiges Springkraut, Indisches Springkraut (DE), kæmpe-balsamin (DK), verev lemmalts (EE), jättipalsami (FI), risalísa (IS), bitinė sprigė (LT), puķu sprigane (LV), Reuzenbalsemien (NL), kjempespringfrø (NO), Niecierpek gruczolowaty, Niecierpek himalajski (PL), недотрога железконосная (RU), jättebalsamin (SE). Fig. 1 and 2. Impatiens glandulifera in an Alnus stand in Helsinki, Finland, and close-up of the seed capsules, photos by Terhi Ryttäri and Harry Helmisaari. Fig. 3 and 4. White and red flowers of Impatiens glandulifera, photos by Harry Helmisaari. Species identification Impatiens glandulifera is a tall annual with a smooth, usually hollow and jointed stem, which is easily broken (figs. 1-4). The stem can reach a height of 3 m and its diameter can be up to several centimetres. The leaves are opposite or in whorls of 3, glabrous, lanceolate to elliptical, 5-18 cm long and 2.5-7 cm wide. The inflorescences are racemes of 2-14 flowers that are 25-40 mm long. Flowers are zygomorphic, their lowest sepal forming a sac that ends in a straight spur.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Genome Size Affect the Evolution of Pollen Tube Growth Rate, a Haploid Performance Trait?
    Manuscript bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version postedClick April here18, 2019. to The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv aaccess/download;Manuscript;PTGR.genome.evolution.15April20 license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Effects of genome size on pollen performance 2 3 4 5 How does genome size affect the evolution of pollen tube growth rate, a haploid 6 performance trait? 7 8 9 10 11 John B. Reese1,2 and Joseph H. Williams2 12 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 13 37996, U.S.A. 14 15 16 17 1Author for correspondence: 18 John B. Reese 19 Tel: 865 974 9371 20 Email: [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version posted April 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 22 ABSTRACT 23 Premise of the Study – Male gametophytes of most seed plants deliver sperm to eggs via a 24 pollen tube. Pollen tube growth rates (PTGRs) of angiosperms are exceptionally rapid, a pattern 25 attributed to more effective haploid selection under stronger pollen competition. Paradoxically, 26 whole genome duplication (WGD) has been common in angiosperms but rare in gymnosperms.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the GIS-Based Maps of the Geomorphological and Phytogeographical Division of the Ukrainian Carpathians for Routine Use in Biogeography
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 36 (2021): a009 https://doi.org/10.21426/B636052326 Developing the GIS-based maps of the geomorphological and phytogeographical division of the Ukrainian Carpathians for routine use in biogeography ANDRIY NOVIKOV Department of Biosystematics and Evolution of the State Natural History Museum of the NAS of Ukraine, Teatralna str. 18, 79008 Lviv (Ukraine) email: [email protected] Keywords: biogeography, mesoregional division, shapefile, Ukrainian Carpathians. SUMMARY The paper introduces GIS-based maps of the geomorphological and phytogeographical division of the Ukrainian Carpathians (a part of Eastern Carpathian Mts.), which were developed for routine use in biogeography and based on the consolidation of the existing publications. The map of the geomorphological division includes 57 OGUs (operational geographic units), and the map of the phytogeographical division – 18 OGUs of the lowest rank. Geomorphological units are supported with available synonyms, which should help in work with different topic-related Ukrainian publications. Both maps follow strict hierarchical classification and are briefly discussed. INTRODUCTION Tsys (1962, 1968) published the first The Ukrainian Carpathians (UC) is part of the complete geomorphologic division of the UC. Eastern Carpathian mountain province Besides five mountainous regions, this division (Kondracki 1989), artificially delimited by the also included adjacent foothills and lowlands western border of Ukraine and covering about (Ciscarpathia and Transcarpathia) and 24,000 km2. In general, these are not high comprised 36 districts. Such regionalization of mountains – only seven peaks of the UC the UC was further developed by many slightly exceed 2000 m of elevation, and all Ukrainian scientists (Herenchuk 1968, these peaks, including the highest point of Marynych et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Spread of Non-Native Plants in Alaska Accelerating?
    Meeting the Challenge: Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Ecosystems IS THE SPREAD OF NON-NATIVE PLANTS IN ALASKA ACCELERATING? Matthew L. Carlson1 and Michael Shephard2 ABSTRACT Alaska has remained relatively unaffected by non-native plants; however, recently the state has started to experience an influx of invasive non-native plants that the rest of the U.S. underwent 60–100 years ago. With the increase in population, gardening, development, and commerce there have been more frequent introductions to Alaska. Many of these species, such as meadow hawkweed (Hieracium caespitosum), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), and spotted knapweed (Centaurea biebersteinii), have only localized populations in Alaska. Other species such as reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and white sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis), both formerly used in roadside seed mixes, are now very widespread and are moving into riparian areas and wetlands. We review the available literature and Alaska’s statewide invasive plant database (AKEPIC, Alaska Exotic Plant Clearinghouse) to summarize changes in Alaska’s non-native flora over the last 65 years. We suggest that Alaska is not immune to invasion, but rather that the exponential increase in non-native plants experienced else- where is delayed by a half century. This review highlights the need for more intensive detection and rapid response work if Alaska is going to remain free of many of the invasive species problems that plague the contiguous U.S. KEYWORDS: Alaska, invasion patterns, invasive plants, non-native plants, plant databases. INTRODUCTION presence of non-native plants. Recently, however, popula- Most botanists and ecologists thought Alaska was immune tions of many non-native species appear to be expanding to the invasion of non-native plants the rest of the United and most troubling, a number of species are spreading into States had experienced, and continue to experience, given natural habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugene District Aquatic and Riparian Restoration Activities
    Environmental Assessment for Eugene District Aquatic and Riparian Restoration Activities Environmental Assessment # DOI-BLM-OR-090-2009-0009-EA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT EUGENE DISTRICT 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Eugene District Office 3106 Pierce Parkway, Suite E Eugene, Oregon 97477 Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your entire comment –including your personal identifying information –may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold from public review your personal identifying information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. In keeping with Bureau of Land Management policy, the Eugene District posts Environmental Assessments, Findings of No Significant Impact, and Decision Records on the district web page under Plans & Projects at www.blm.gov/or/districts/eugene. Individuals desiring a paper copy of such documents will be provided one upon request. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION I. Introduction .......................................................................................................4 II. Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................4 III. Conformance .....................................................................................................5 IV. Issues for Analysis ............................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Characteristics of Invasive Alien Plants John H
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Ecological Characteristics of Invasive Alien Plants John H. Brock1 ABSTRACT An influx of alien plant material to the North American flora accompanied the settlement of the continent by immigrant peoples during the latter part of the 19th century. Plant materials were introduced as ornamentals, agronomic crops, land conseNation material, and many were accidentally introduced as contaminants in seeds of desirable plants such as small grain crops. In the early 20th century introductions continued as people wanted to improve on the natural vegetation, and have plants that seemed to be better adapted to habitats than were components of the native flora. Several of these well-intended introductions are now considered as invasive. This paper presents information about some of the general characteristics of invasive plants including: pollination strategies, regeneration strategies, seed and propagule dispersal, formation of ecotypes, the lag time from introduction until the plant is termed invasive, and some aspects of the physiology of invasive plants. Many alien plants have naturalized to the environment of North America, and are so widespread that vegetation management strategies to control the whole population are probably not feasible. However, strategies to control the further invasion by the alien species are needed and will most likely incorporate integrated weed management techniques that are socially and politically acceptable. INTRODUCTION When taking a global view, there is a question among plant ecologists if a species is ever truly an "alien". However, in studying invasion ecology, an introduced species of a flora must be treated as alien to an ecosystem because it would not be there without human inteNention (Pysek 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment Land Off New Line, Bacup
    Ecological Assessment Land off New Line, Bacup Report reference: BE-R-1096-01 September 2011 Report Title: Ecological Assessment Land off New Line, Bacup Report Reference: BE-R-1096-01 Written by Michelle Dickinson BSc (Hons) MSc MIEEM Ecologist Technical review: Peter James Brooks BSc (Hons) MA MIEEM CEnv Director QA review: Peter James Brooks BSc (Hons) MA MIEEM CEnv Director Approved for issue Peter James Brooks BSc (Hons) MA MIEEM CEnv Director Date: 19.10.11 High Street House, 2 High Street, Yeadon, Leeds, LS19 7PP Phone 0113 250 6101 Fax 0113 250 6944 Email: [email protected] Registered in England Number 5351418 www.brooks-ecological.co.uk Summary Statement The site has been found to be of low conservation value. There is potential for a badger sett to be present within 30m of the site, but not within it, and therefore a badger survey has been recommended. The application site itself holds no suitable habitat for any other protected species which may be present within the surrounding area and therefore no other further surveys at this point are required. The site has been found to contain invasive species which will need to be removed by a licensed contractor. General recommendations in terms of preventing impacts on the adjacent watercourse, as well as enhancing the site’s biodiversity are made in the report. Land off New Line, Bacup Introduction Brooks Ecological Ltd was commissioned by Harron Homes to carry out an ecological assessment of land off New Line, Bacup, Lancashire (SD 878215). Figure 1: Application Site Boundary Site Proposals The proposal is for a residential development on previously developed land.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
    National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Contents White / Cream ................................ 2 Grasses ...................................... 130 Yellow ..........................................33 Rushes ....................................... 138 Red .............................................63 Sedges ....................................... 140 Pink ............................................66 Shrubs / Trees .............................. 148 Blue / Purple .................................83 Wood-rushes ................................ 154 Green / Brown ............................. 106 Indexes Aquatics ..................................... 118 Common name ............................. 155 Clubmosses ................................. 124 Scientific name ............................. 160 Ferns / Horsetails .......................... 125 Appendix .................................... 165 Key Traffic light system WF symbol R A G Species with the symbol G are For those recording at the generally easier to identify; Wildflower Level only. species with the symbol A may be harder to identify and additional information is provided, particularly on illustrations, to support you. Those with the symbol R may be confused with other species. In this instance distinguishing features are provided. Introduction This guide has been produced to help you identify the plants we would like you to record for the National Plant Monitoring Scheme. There is an index at
    [Show full text]