Archaeology ­ Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Archaeology from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archaeology ­ Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Archaeology from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 7/13/2015 Archaeology ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archaeology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archaeology or archeology,[1] is the study of human activity in the past, primarily through the recovery and analysis of the material culture and environmental data that has been left behind by past human populations, which includes artifacts, architecture, biofacts (also known as eco­facts) and cultural landscapes (the archaeological record). Because archaeology employs a wide range of different procedures, it can be considered to be both a social science and a humanity,[2] and in the United States, it is thought of as a branch of anthropology,[3] although in Europe, it is viewed as a discipline in its own right, or related to other Roman ruins, Lausanne, Switzerland. disciplines. For example, much of archaeology in the United Kingdom is considered a part the study of history, while in France it is considered part of Geology. Archaeology studies human prehistory and history from the development of the first stone tools in eastern Africa 4 million years ago up until recent decades.[4] (Archaeology does not include the discipline of paleontology). It is of most importance for learning about prehistoric societies, when there are no written records for historians to study, making up over 99% of total human history, from the Paleolithic until the advent of literacy in any given society.[2] Archaeology has various goals, which range from studying human evolution to cultural evolution and understanding culture history.[5] The discipline involves surveying, excavation and eventually analysis of data collected to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross­disciplinary research. It draws upon anthropology, history, art history, classics, ethnology, geography,[6] geology,[7][8][9] linguistics, semiology, physics, information sciences, chemistry, statistics, paleoecology, paleontology, paleozoology, paleoethnobotany, and paleobotany. Archaeology developed out of antiquarianism in Europe during the 19th century, and has since become a discipline practiced across the world. Since its early development, various specific sub­disciplines of archaeology have developed, including maritime archaeology, feminist archaeology and archaeoastronomy, and numerous different scientific techniques have been developed to aid archaeological investigation. Nonetheless, today, archaeologists face many problems, such as dealing with pseudoarchaeology, the looting of artifacts, a lack of public interest, and opposition to the excavation of human remains. Contents 1 History 1.1 Antiquarians 1.2 First excavations 1.3 Development of archaeological method 2 Purpose https://en.wikipedia.or2g/.w1ik iT/Ahrcehaoeroylogy 1/24 7/13/2015 Archaeology ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 2.1 Theory 3 Methods 3.1 Remote sensing 3.2 Field survey 3.3 Excavation 3.4 Analysis 3.5 Virtual archaeology 3.6 Drones 4 Academic sub­disciplines 4.1 Historical archaeology 4.2 Ethnoarchaeology 4.3 Experimental archaeology 4.4 Archaeometry 4.5 Cultural resources management 5 Popular views of archaeology 6 Current issues and controversy 6.1 Public archaeology 6.2 Pseudoarchaeology 6.3 Looting 6.4 Descendant peoples 6.4.1 Repatriation 7 Fictional archaeologists 8 See also 9 References 10 Bibliography 11 Further reading 12 External links History Antiquarians The science of archaeology (from Greek ἀρχαιολογία, archaiologia from ἀρχαῖος, arkhaios, "ancient" and ­ λογία, ­logia, "­logy")[10] grew out of the older multi­disciplinary study known as antiquarianism. Antiquarians studied history with particular attention to ancient artefacts and manuscripts, as well as historical sites. Antiquarianism focused on the empirical evidence that existed for the understanding of the past, encapsulated in the motto of the 18th­century antiquary, Sir Richard Colt Hoare, "We speak from facts not theory". Tentative steps towards the systematization of archaeology as a science took place during the Enlightenment era in Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries.[11] In Europe, philosophical interest in the remains of Greco­Roman civilisation and the rediscovery of classical culture began in the late Middle Age. Flavio Biondo an Italian Renaissance humanist historian created a systematic guide to the ruins and topography of ancient Rome in the early 15th century for which he has been called an early founder of archaeology. Antiquarians, including John Leland and William Camden, conducted surveys of the English countryside, drawing, describing and interpreting the monuments that they encountered. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology 2/24 7/13/2015 Archaeology ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia First excavations One of the first sites to undergo archaeological excavation was Stonehenge and other megalithic monuments in England. John Aubrey was a pioneer archaeologist who recorded numerous megalithic and other field monuments in southern England. He was also ahead of his time in the analysis of his findings. He attempted to chart the chronological stylistic evolution of handwriting, medieval architecture, costume, and shield­ shapes.[12] An early photograph of Stonehenge taken July 1877 Excavations were also carried out in the ancient towns of Pompeii and Herculaneum, both of which had been covered by ash during the Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79. These excavations began in 1748 in Pompeii, while in Herculaneum they began in 1738. The discovery of entire towns, complete with utensils and even human shapes, as well the unearthing of ancient frescos, had a big impact throughout Europe. However, prior to the development of modern techniques, excavations tended to be haphazard; the importance of concepts such as stratification and context were overlooked.[13] Development of archaeological method The father of archaeological excavation was William Cunnington (1754–1810). He undertook excavations in Wiltshire from around 1798,[14] funded by Sir Richard Colt Hoare. Cunnington made meticulous recordings of neolithic and Bronze Age barrows, and the terms he used to categorise and describe them are still used by archaeologists today.[15] One of the major achievements of 19th century archaeology was the development of stratigraphy. The idea of overlapping strata tracing back to successive periods was borrowed from the new geological and palaeontological work of scholars like William Smith, James Hutton Artefacts discovered at the 1808 and Charles Lyell. The application of stratigraphy to archaeology first Bush Barrow excavation by Sir took place with the excavations of prehistorical and Bronze Age sites. Richard Colt Hoare and William In the third and fourth decades of the 19th century, archaeologists like Cunnington. Jacques Boucher de Perthes and Christian Jürgensen Thomsen began to put the artifacts they had found in chronological order. A major figure in the development of archaeology into a rigorous science was the army officer and ethnologist, Augustus Pitt Rivers,[16] who began excavations on his land in England in the 1880s. His approach was highly methodical by the standards of the time, and he is widely regarded as the first scientific archaeologist. He arranged his artefacts by type or "typologically, and within types by date or "chronologically". This style of arrangement, designed to highlight the evolutionary trends in human https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology 3/24 7/13/2015 Archaeology ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia artefacts, was of enormous significance for the accurate dating of the objects. His most important methodological innovation was his insistence that all artefacts, not just beautiful or unique ones, be collected and catalogued.[17] William Flinders Petrie is another man who may legitimately be called the Father of Archaeology. His painstaking recording and study of artefacts, both in Egypt and later in Palestine, laid down many of the ideas behind modern archaeological recording; he remarked that "I believe the true line of research lies in the noting and comparison of the smallest details." Petrie developed the system of dating layers based on pottery and ceramic findings, which revolutionized the chronological basis of Egyptology. Petrie was the first to scientifically investigate the Great Pyramid in Egypt during the 1880s.[18] He was also responsible for mentoring and training a whole generation of Egyptologists, including Howard Carter who went on to achieve fame with the discovery of the tomb of 14th­century BC pharaoh Tutankhamun. The first stratigraphic excavation to reach wide popularity with public was that of Hissarlik, on the site of ancient Troy, carried out by Heinrich Schliemann, Frank Calvert, Wilhelm Dörpfeld and Carl Blegen in the 1870s. These scholars individuated nine different cities that had overlapped with one another, from prehistory to the Hellenistic period.[19] Meanwhile, the work of Sir Arthur Evans at Knossos in Crete revealed the ancient existence of an equally advanced Minoan civilization.[20] The next major figure in the development of archaeology was Sir Mortimer Wheeler pioneered Mortimer Wheeler, whose highly disciplined approach to excavation systematic excavation in the early and systematic coverage in the 1920s and 1930s brought the science 20th century. Pictured, are his on swiftly. Wheeler developed the grid system of excavation, which excavations at Maiden Castle, Dorset, was further improved by his student Kathleen Kenyon. in October 1937. Archaeology became a professional activity in the first half of the
Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Institution Archives (SIA)
    SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2020 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 2.0 (Updated January 2020) Copyright © 2020 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeoacoustics: a Key Role of Echoes at Utah Rock Art Sites
    Steven J. Waller ARCHAEOACOUSTICS: A KEY ROLE OF ECHOES AT UTAH ROCK ART SITES Archaeoacoustics is an emerging field of study emanate from rock surfaces where beings are investigating sound in relation to the past. The depicted, as if the images are speaking. Myths intent of this paper is to convey appreciation for attribute echoes to sheep, humans, lizards, the echoes at Utah rock art sites, by recognizing snakes and other figures that are major rock art the importance of their influence both on the themes. Echo-rich Fremont Indian State Park ancient artists, and on modern scientific studies. even has a panel that has been interpreted as The title of this paper is thus intentionally showing the mythological Echo Twin. The worded such that it could be understood in two study, appreciation, and preservation of rock art different but interrelated ways. One, the study acoustics in Utah are encouraged. of sound indicates that echoes were an im- portant factor relative to rock art in Utah. Two, INITIAL STUDIES OUTSIDE UTAH the echoes found to be associated with Utah rock art sites have been particularly helpful in A conceptual connection between sound and developing theories relating sound to past cul- rock art originally occurred to me when visiting tural activities and ideologies. This paper de- European Palaeolithic caves in 1987. A fortui- scribes in a roughly chronological order the tous shout at the mouth of a cave resulted in a events and studies that have led to Utah featur- startling echo. I immediately remembered the ing prominently in the development of archaeo- Greek myth in which echoes were attributed to acoustics.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews Skeleton: Some Thoughts on the Relocation of Cultural Heritage Disputes” (Gerstenblith)
    159 Reviews Skeleton: Some Thoughts on the Relocation of Cultural Heritage Disputes” (Gerstenblith). Douglas Owsley and Richard Jantz interpret the Kennewick case as “a clash Edited by Charles R. Ewen between two systems of conceptualizing and tracing human history” (p. 141), although they assert that the origin of the lawsuit lies more with a lack of compliance with existing laws than with the ideological battle. In their chapter they Claiming the Stones/Naming the Bones: describe in great detail the myriad of research questions that Cultural Property and the Negotiation of the Kennewick skeleton raises and could potentially answer National and Ethnic Identity with further scientifi c study. ELAZAR BARKAN AND RONALD BUSH Patty Gerstenblith’s article, on the other hand, frames (EDITORS) the Kennewick case (and NAGPRA as a whole) in terms of social justice—returning to marginalized groups some Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, control over their own pasts (and thus their cultural identi- CA, 2003. 384 pp., 33 illus., index. $50.00 ties). She argues from a particularistic stance, outlining the paper. long history that has served to disconnect Native American groups from their cultural patrimony through a privileging Claiming the Stones/Naming the Bones is a timely volume of scientifi c evidence while simultaneously, through displace- that attempts to crosscut multiple disciplines (including ment and policies of cultural eradication, making it diffi cult archaeology, physical anthropology, literature, cultural stud- obtain such evidence. ies, ethnomusicology, and museum studies) and offer per- Neither Owsley and Jantz nor Gerstenblith overtly draw spectives regarding disputes over the defi nition and owner- attention to global vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina Gabrielle Casio Purcell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Purcell, Gabrielle Casio, "Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2447 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Gabrielle Casio Purcell entitled "Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace D. Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Michael Logan Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) i Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Gabrielle Casio Purcell August 2013 ii Copyright © 2013 by Gabrielle Casio Purcell All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey
    acoustics Article An Archaeoacoustics Analysis of Cistercian Architecture: The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey Sebastian Duran *, Martyn Chambers * and Ioannis Kanellopoulos * School of Media Arts and Technology, Solent University (Southampton), East Park Terrace, Southampton SO14 0YN, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (I.K.) Abstract: The Cistercian order is of acoustic interest because previous research has hypothesized that Cistercian architectural structures were designed for longer reverberation times in order to reinforce Gregorian chants. The presented study focused on an archaeoacacoustics analysis of the Cistercian Beaulieu Abbey (Hampshire, England, UK), using Geometrical Acoustics (GA) to recreate and investigate the acoustical properties of the original structure. To construct an acoustic model of the Abbey, the building’s dimensions and layout were retrieved from published archaeology research and comparison with equivalent structures. Absorption and scattering coefficients were assigned to emulate the original room surface materials’ acoustics properties. CATT-Acoustics was then used to perform the acoustics analysis of the simplified building structure. Shorter reverbera- tion time (RTs) was generally observed at higher frequencies for all the simulated scenarios. Low speech intelligibility index (STI) and speech clarity (C50) values were observed across Abbey’s nave section. Despite limitations given by the impossibility to calibrate the model according to in situ measurements conducted in the original structure, the simulated acoustics performance suggested Citation: Duran, S.; Chambers, M.; how the Abbey could have been designed to promote sacral music and chants, rather than preserve Kanellopoulos, I. An Archaeoacoustics high speech intelligibility. Analysis of Cistercian Architecture: The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey.
    [Show full text]
  • The SAA Archaeological Record (ISSN 1532-7299) Is Published five Times a Year Andrew Duff and Is Edited by Andrew Duff
    the archaeologicalrecord SAA SEPTEMBER 2007 • VOLUME 7 • NUMBER 4 SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY the SAAarchaeologicalrecord The Magazine of the Society for American Archaeology Volume 7, No. 4 September 2007 Editor’s Corner 2 Andrew Duff Letters to the Editor 3 From the President 6 Dean R. Snow In Brief 7 Tobi A. Brimsek Archaeopolitics 8 Dan Sandweiss and David Lindsay Probing during cemetery Vancouver in 2008 9 Dana Lepofsky, Sue Rowley, delineation in Coweta Andrew Martindale, County, Georgia. and Alan McMillan Photo by Ron Hobgood. RPA: The Issue of Commercialism: Proposed Changes 10 Jeffrey H. Altschul to the Register’s Code of Conduct Archaeology’s High Society Blues: Reply to McGimsey 11 Lawrence E. Moore Amerind-SAA Seminars: A Progress Report 15 John A. Ware Email X and the Quito Airport Archaeology 20 Douglas C. Comer Controversy: A Cautionary Tale for Scholars in the Age of Rapid Information Flow Identifying the Geographic Locations 24 German Loffler in Need of More CRM Training Can the Dissertation Be All Things to All People? 29 John D. Rissetto Networks: Historic Preservation Learning Portal: 33 Richard C. Waldbauer, Constance Werner Ramirez, A Performance Support Project for and Dan Buan Cultural Resource Managers Interfaces: 12V 35 Harold L. Dibble, Shannon J.P. McPherron, and Thomas McPherron Heritage Planning 42 Yun Shun Susie Chung In Memoriam: Jaime Litvak King 47 Emily McClung de Tapia and Paul Schmidt Calls for Awards Nominations 48 positions open 52 news and notes 54 calendar 56 EDITOR’S CORNER the SAAarchaeologicalrecord The Magazine of the Society for American Archaeology Volume 7, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Text-Aided Archeology
    ARCHAEOLOGY – Vol. I - Text-Aided Archaeology - Nancy C. Wilkie TEXT-AIDED ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy C. Wilkie Classics and Anthropology, Carleton College, Northfield, MN, USA Keywords: Culture history, Documents, Historical archaeology, Iconography, Literature, Nationalism, Oral history, Philology, Postprocessual archaeology, Prehistoric, Processual archaeology, Protohistoric, Texts. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Texts and material remains 3. Texts and historical archaeology 3.1. Literary texts 3.2. Documents 3.3. Oral traditions 3.4. Iconography and images 4. Culture History, Processual, and Postprocessual Archaeology 5. Examples of Text-Aided Archaeology 5.1. Text-aided historical archaeology in the Mediterranean, Near East and Egypt 5.1.1. Greece 5.1.2. Biblical Lands 5.1.3. Mesopotamia 5.1.4. Egypt 5.2. India and Nepal 5.3. China 5.4. Africa 5.5. North America 5.6. Mesoamerica 6. Text-aided prehistoric/protohistoric archaeology 6.1. Bronze Age Greece and Homeric archaeology 6.2. Plato and Atlantis 6.3. Sanskrit Epics 7. Conclusion Glossary BibliographyUNESCO – EOLSS Biographical Sketch SAMPLE CHAPTERS Summary Texts have been used in archaeological research since the inception of the discipline. The first archaeological explorations took place in circum-Mediterranean lands at a time when the tradition of classical scholarship was strong and where there were numerous texts, such as those of ancient geographers and historians, that could be consulted in order to identify and date ancient sites and monuments. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) ARCHAEOLOGY – Vol. I - Text-Aided Archaeology - Nancy C. Wilkie With the development of culture history as an approach to the study of the past during the nineteenth century, the use of texts in archaeological research became even more important, as archaeologists strove to define the ethnic groups responsible for the production of the artifacts that they were collecting and classifying.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology (AN) 1
    Anthropology (AN) 1 AN-262 Primate Behavior, Evolution and Ecology Credits: 3 ANTHROPOLOGY (AN) Term Offered: Spring Term Course Type(s): None AN-103 Cultural Anthropology Credits: 3 The study of primatology, which examines the lifeways, biology, and Term Offered: All Terms behavior of our closest living relatives. Various topics will be explored Course Type(s): SS.SV including taxonomy and classification, diet, behavior, grouping patterns, Introduction to comparative study of human beliefs and behavior. locomotion, and land usage patterns of monkeys, apes and prosimians. Emphasis on the concepts used in studying human culture; analysis These topics will be explored within the frameworks of natural selection, of non-Western societies with respect to ecology, economy, social and sexual selection, and evolution. Also listed as BY-262. political organization, religion, and art; implications for American society. AN-263 Peoples and Cultures of South America Credits: 3 AN-104 Introduction to Biological Anthropology Credits: 3 Prerequisite(s): AN-103 or AN-113 Term Offered: All Terms Course Type(s): RE Course Type(s): HE.EL, HEPE, SS.SV A social and cultural survey of representative peoples in South America Introduction to physical anthropology; racial variation and the and the Caribbean, emphasizing the comparative study of economic, evolutionary origins of the human species; concepts and principles used political, social, and religious organization. in the study of living and fossil evidence for human evolution and genetic AN-264 North American Indians Credits: 3 diversity; unique influence of culture on human biology; human evolution Term Offered: All Terms in the present and future. Course Type(s): GU, RE AN-107 Introduction to Archaeology Credits: 3 A survey of the cultural, social and linguistic diversity of Pre-Columbian Term Offered: All Terms North American societies; problems of contemporary Indian groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Economies in Pre-Hispanic Southern Mexico 155
    The The Recognition of the role of animals in ancient diet, economy, politics, and ritual is vital to understanding ancient cultures fully, while following the clues available from Archaeobiology 1 animal remains in reconstructing environments is vital to understanding the ancient relationship between humans and the world around them. In response to the growing interest in the field of zooarchaeology, this volume presents current research from across the many cultures and regions of Mesoamerica, dealing specifically with the Archaeology most current issues in zooarchaeological literature. Geographically, the essays collected here index the The Archaeology of different aspects of animal use by the indigenous populations of the entire area between the northern borders of Mexico and the southern borders of lower Central America. This includes such diverse cultures as the Olmec, Maya, Zapotec, Mixtec, and Central American Indians. The time frame of the volume extends from the Preclassic to recent times. The book’s chapters, written by experts in the field of Mesoamerican Mesoamerican Animals of Mesoamerican zooarchaeology, provide important general background on the domestic and ritual use of animals in early and classic Mesoamerica and Central America, but deal also with special aspects of human–animal relationships such as early domestication and symbolism of animals, and important yet edited by Christopher M. Götz and Kitty F. Emery otherwise poorly represented aspects of taphonomy and zooarchaeological methodology. Christopher M. Götz is Profesor-Investigador (lecturer & researcher), Facultad de Ciencias Antropológicas, UADY, Mexico. Kitty F. Emery is Associate Curator of Environmental Archaeology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, USA. Animals “A must for those interested in the interaction of human and animals in Mesoamerica or elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Archaeology
    North Carolina Archaeology Volume 65 2016 North Carolina Archaeology Volume 65 October 2016 CONTENTS Don’t Let Ethics Get in the Way of Doing What’s Right: Three Decades of Working with Collectors in North Carolina I. Randolph Daniel, Jr. ......................................................................................... 1 Mariners’ Maladies: Examining Medical Equipage from the Queen Anne’s Revenge Shipwreck Linda F. Carnes-McNaughton ........................................................................... 28 Archival Excavations from Dusty File Cabinets, Part I: Unpublished Artifact Pattern Data of Colonial Period Households, Dependency Buildings, and Public Structures from Colonial Brunswick Town Thomas E. Beaman, Jr. ...................................................................................... 53 Preface: Identifying and Defining North Carolina’s Archaeological Heritage through Remote Sensing and Geophysics John J. Mintz and Shawn M. Patch .................................................................... 90 The Role of GPR in Archaeology: A Beginning Not an End Charles R. Ewen ................................................................................................. 92 Three-dimensional Remote Sensing at House in the Horseshoe State Historic Site (31MR20), Moore County, North Carolina Stacy Curry and Doug Gallaway ..................................................................... 100 An Overview of Geophysical Surveys and Ground-truthing Excavations at House in the Horseshoe (31MR20), Moore County, North
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE (September 2011)
    CURRICULUM VITAE (September 2011) David William Steadman Present Positions and Address: Curator of Ornithology; Associate Director for Collections and Research Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville, FL 32611. Telephone (352) 273-1969; Fax (352) 846-0287; E-mail, [email protected] Primary Research Interests: Ornithology, zooarchaeology, and vertebrate paleontology of tropical and subtropical regions. Extinction, systematics, and historic biogeography of birds on Caribbean and Pacific islands. Paleontology, biogeography, evolution, and community ecology of New World landbirds. Education: Ph.D. Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1982 M.S. Zoology, University of Florida, 1975 B.S. Biology, Edinboro State College, 1973 Recent Employment History: August 2001 – June 2004, August 2007 – present: Assistant/Associate Director for Collections and Research, Florida Museum of Natural History March 2000 – February 2003: University of Florida Research Foundation Professor August 1995 – present: Assistant/Associate/Full Curator of Ornithology, Florida Museum of Natural History February 1985 – July 1995: Associate and Senior Scientist (Zoology), and Curator of Vertebrates, New York State Museum Research Grants: August 2011 (ongoing) Collaborative Research: Long-term Dynamics and Resilience of Terrrestrial Plant and Animal Communities in the Bahamas. National Science Foundation (J. Franklin, DWS, P.L. Fall; total award $414,000; UF portion $164,573). August 2011 (ongoing) U.S.-Peru Planning Visit: Planning a Collaborative Program of Vertebrate Paleontology in Northwestern Peru. $21,296. National Science Foundation. November 2009 (ongoing) Logistical and Intellectual Foundation for Teaching Field Courses in the Bahamas and Turks & Caicos Islands. $22,168. Faculty Enhancement Opportunity Award, Provost’s Office, University of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]