Inside the Incelosphere: Tracing the Origins and Navigating the Contradictions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inside the Incelosphere: Tracing the Origins and Navigating the Contradictions INSIDE THE INCELOSPHERE: TRACING THE ORIGINS AND NAVIGATING THE CONTRADICTIONS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Special Case Master of Arts in Women’s and Gender Studies By Lee Williams August, 2020 Copyright 2020: Lee Williams UNIVERSITY OF REGINA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINING COMMITTEE Lee Williams, candidate for the degree of Special Case Master of Arts in Women’s and Gender Studies, has presented a thesis titled, Inside the Incelosphere: Tracing the Origins and Navigating the Contradictions, in an oral examination held on July 27, 2020. The following committee members have found the thesis acceptable in form and content, and that the candidate demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of the subject material. External Examiner: Dr. Murray Knuttila, Brock University Co-Supervisor: Dr. A. Brenda Anderson, Department of Women’s & Gender Studies Co-Supervisor: Dr. Dawn Flood, Department of History Committee Member: Dr. Patricia Elliott, Department of Journalism Chair of Defense: Dr. Marta Bashovski, Department of Politics & International Studies *Not present at defense Williams i Abstract Incel, an online community of men connected through their shared lack of intimate relationships with women, is often described as a monolithic misogynist group of privileged and entitled white men. My research has revealed that, contrary to this dominant narrative, Incel is a racially diverse space and that this description overlooks the complexities and nuances that define this community. Incel is the product of both twenty-first century communication technology and the rhetoric of mid-twentieth century men’s movements. The Manbox, the foundation for Western hegemonic masculinity after the Second World War, is the form of masculinity that was both critiqued and embraced by these men’s movements, and now by Incel. Central elements of Incel rhetoric, such as the de-politicizing of gender, the notion that manhood must be earned or achieved, and the belief that feminism created the lie of male privilege, mirror those of men’s liberationists and the MRM. This study involved a qualitative analysis of the Incel forum Incels.Co. Discussion threads were reviewed and selected for further analysis over five-months. Data on the demographics of Incels.Co members, the use of pseudo-science and views on sexuality and race provided an essential framework to understand better the four central themes developed through this research. The four themes are: (1) Masculinities; (2) Views on Women; (3) Masculinity and Violence; (4) Masculinity, Mental Health and Self Esteem. These four themes are defined by contradiction and paradox. How hegemonic masculinity, the dominant form of masculinity in Western society, operates on Incels.Co is complex and even contradictory. Elements of hegemonic masculinity, such as heteronormativity, are strictly reinforced, while others, such as physical strength and financial success, become prominent copes, ways to, potentially, escape life as an incel. At the same time, there is a critique Williams ii of the narrow standards of hegemonic masculinity, such as the expectation to remain stoic and emotionally repressed. There is a struggle to conform to these narrow standards and to deal with the consequences of failing to meet them, which data revealed to have a significant impact on the self-esteem and mental health of these men. This study revealed that women are caught in a Madonna/Whore dichotomy in Incel discourse; having the ability to lift men out of inceldom, their bodies and their love is desired. However, incels also view women as the cause of the problems they face; women’s hypergamy, feminism, and the biological urges that influence and drive women have created a society where incels cannot win. This narrative of Incel victimization is aided by the adoption of hybrid masculinities, which distance incels from male privilege (Ging 14). Women’s perceived violence against incels is used to justify violence against them, as to recognize women as victims would undermine the Incel narrative of victimization. Violence is a normalized aspect of the discourse on Incels.Co, through language and through the glorification of those comment acts of violence against women, used as a way to publicly perform and reclaim masculinity (Kimmel, Angry White Men 179). The findings of this study reveal that Incel is not a contemporary aberration of extremist views but rather is founded upon the rhetoric of twentieth-century men’s movements. Rather than a homogenous community with a common world view, Incel is a space of conflict, contradiction, and paradox. The Incelosphere’s misogyny and dehumanization of women represent the negative impacts of patriarchal Western society, amplified through the echo chamber effect. Incel also presents a valid critique of the narrow ideal men are expected to meet in order to be ‘a man’ and the detrimental effects this can have. Williams iii Acknowledgments I am indebted to my co-supervisors, Dr. Brenda Anderson, and Dr. Dawn Flood. Their expertise in gender and history helped me lay a solid foundation for my analysis and guided me through the challenges and uncertainties of my research. Their continued guidance and support of my work, balanced with reminders of the importance of self-care, helped me successfully complete a challenging data collection and research process. I also wish to express my gratitude to my committee member, Dr. Patricia Elliott; her advice and suggestions helped strengthen my work and aided me to accurately and effectively convey the findings of my research. I gratefully acknowledge the University of Regina for funding through teaching assistantships and the UR Graduate Scholarship, as well as the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research for funding through a Master Graduate Teaching Assistantship. In addition, I wish to acknowledgement the Government of Saskatchewan for funding through the Saskatchewan Innovation & Excellence Scholarship. I wish to acknowledge the support of my family and friends through my university career. They have helped me stay grounded, provided support and a space to step back when research became challenging. I would also like to extend a sincere thank you to my office neighbour across the hall. Her genuine care and acts of kindness truly made some difficult days of research so much better. Williams iv Post Defence Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge Dr. Murray Knuttila, who graciously agreed to be my external examiner. His questions gave me an important opportunity to reflect on my work and where I would like to take this research. His knowledge and feedback have helped me refine my thesis and have proven to be invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr. Marta Bashovski, the examining committee chair, for her time and work organizing this virtual defence. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iii Post Defence Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Methodology ................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 3: Historical Analysis ...................................................................................................... 15 Early Twentieth Century ........................................................................................................ 15 Post Second World War ......................................................................................................... 16 Men’s Liberation ..................................................................................................................... 18 Divisions and the Men’s Rights Movement........................................................................... 23 Chapter 4: Contemporary Online Men’s Movements & Masculinities ........................................ 29 Masculinities: Power and Fear, Privilege and Pain ............................................................. 33 Chapter 5: The Incelosphere ......................................................................................................... 38 Chapter 6: Data Analysis .............................................................................................................. 50 Demographics .......................................................................................................................... 52 (Pseudo)Science in the Incelosphere and Defining Theories ........................................... 54 Sexualities ............................................................................................................................. 59 Race ....................................................................................................................................... 64 Masculinities in the Incelosphere: Navigating the Contradictions ..................................... 69 The Madonna and the Whore: Incel’s Views of Women ..................................................... 77
Recommended publications
  • Click Here to View a Sample Chapter of the Pandemic Population
    2020 by Tim Elmore All rights reserved. You have beeN graNted the NoN-exclusive, NoN-traNsferable right to access aNd read the text of this e-book oN screeN. No parts of this book may be reproduced, traNsmitted, decompiled, reverse eNgiNeered, or stored iN or iNtroduced iNto aNy iNformatioN storage or retrieval system iN aNy form by aNy meaNs, whether electroNic or mechaNical, Now kNowN or hereiNafter iNveNted, without express writteN permissioN from the publisher. Published by AmazoN iN associatioN with GrowiNg Leaders, INc. PandemicPopulation.com Pandemics, Protests, and Panic Attacks: A History Defined by Tragedy There is an age-old story that illustrates the state of millions of American teens today. It’s the tale of a man who sat in a local diner waiting for his lunch. His countenance was down, he was feeling discouraged, and his tone was melancholy. When his waitress saw he was feeling low, she immediately suggested he go see Grimaldi. The circus was in town, and Grimaldi was a clown who made everyone laugh. The waitress was certain Grimaldi could cheer up her sad customer. Little did she know with whom she was speaking. The man looked up at her and replied, “But, ma’am. I am Grimaldi.” In many ways, this is a picture of the Pandemic Population. On the outside, they’re clowning around on Snapchat and TikTok, laughing at memes and making others laugh at filtered photos on social media. Inside, however, their mental health has gone south. It appears their life is a comedy, but in reality, it feels like a tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Alone Together: Exploring Community on an Incel Forum
    Alone Together: Exploring Community on an Incel Forum by Vanja Zdjelar B.A. (Hons., Criminology), Simon Fraser University, 2016 B.A. (Political Science and Communication), Simon Fraser University, 2016 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Criminology Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Vanja Zdjelar 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY FALL 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Declaration of Committee Name: Vanja Zdjelar Degree: Master of Arts Thesis title: Alone Together: Exploring Community on an Incel Forum Committee: Chair: Bryan Kinney Associate Professor, Criminology Garth Davies Supervisor Associate Professor, Criminology Sheri Fabian Committee Member University Lecturer, Criminology David Hofmann Examiner Associate Professor, Sociology University of New Brunswick ii Abstract Incels, or involuntary celibates, are men who are angry and frustrated at their inability to find sexual or intimate partners. This anger has repeatedly resulted in violence against women. Because incels are a relatively new phenomenon, there are many gaps in our knowledge, including how, and to what extent, incel forums function as online communities. The current study begins to fill this lacuna by qualitatively analyzing the incels.co forum to understand how community is created through online discourse. Both inductive and deductive thematic analyses were conducted on 17 threads (3400 posts). The results confirm that the incels.co forum functions as a community. Four themes in relation to community were found: The incel brotherhood; We can disagree, but you’re wrong; We are all coping here; and Will the real incel come forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 2, 08/09/2017 20:48:33
    A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right 1 A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right Patrick S. Forscher1 and Nour S. Kteily2 1Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, 2Department of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University. Author notes Data and materials for this project can be found at https://osf.io/xge8q/ Conceived research: Forscher & Kteily; Designed research: Forscher & Kteily; Collected data: Forscher & Kteily; Analyzed data: Forscher & Kteily; Wrote paper: Forscher & Kteily; Revised paper: Forscher & Kteily. Address correspondence to Patrick S. Forscher, Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, 216 Memorial Hall, Fayetteville, AR, 72701 (Email: [email protected]). A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right 2 Abstract The 2016 U.S. presidential election coincided with the rise the “alternative right” or “alt- right”. Although alt-right associates wield considerable influence on the current administration, the movement’s loose organizational structure has led to disparate portrayals of its members’ psychology, compounded by a lack of empirical investigation. We surveyed 447 alt-right adherents on a battery of psychological measures, comparing their responses to those of 382 non- adherents. Alt-right adherents were much more distrustful of the mainstream media and government; expressed higher Dark Triad traits, social dominance orientation, and authoritarianism; reported high levels of aggression; and exhibited extreme levels of overt intergroup bias, including blatant dehumanization of racial minorities. Cluster analyses suggest that alt-right supporters may separate into two subgroups: one more populist and anti- establishmentarian and the other more supremacist and motivated by maintaining social hierarchy. We argue for the need to give overt bias greater empirical and theoretical consideration in contemporary intergroup research.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse-Engineering Twitter's Content Removal
    “We Believe in Free Expression...” Reverse-Engineering Twitter’s Content Removal Policies for the Alt-Right The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:38811534 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Contents The Problem & The Motivation .............................................................................. 4 Free Speech: Before and After the Internet ......................................................... 5 Speech on Twitter .............................................................................................. 11 Defining the Alt-Right ....................................................................................... 13 The Alt-Right on Social Media ......................................................................... 14 Social Media Reaction to Charlottesville .......................................................... 17 Twitter’s Policies for the Alt-Right ................................................................... 19 Previous Work ................................................................................................... 21 Structure of this Thesis .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and Its Multifarious Enemies
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Maxime Dafaure, « The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/369 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies 1 The “Great Meme War:” the Alt- Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Memes and the metapolitics of the alt-right 1 The alt-right has been a major actor of the online culture wars of the past few years. Since it came to prominence during the 2014 Gamergate controversy,1 this loosely- defined, puzzling movement has achieved mainstream recognition and has been the subject of discussion by journalists and scholars alike. Although the movement is notoriously difficult to define, a few overarching themes can be delineated: unequivocal rejections of immigration and multiculturalism among most, if not all, alt- right subgroups; an intense criticism of feminism, in particular within the manosphere community, which itself is divided into several clans with different goals and subcultures (men’s rights activists, Men Going Their Own Way, pick-up artists, incels).2 Demographically speaking, an overwhelming majority of alt-righters are white heterosexual males, one of the major social categories who feel dispossessed and resentful, as pointed out as early as in the mid-20th century by Daniel Bell, and more recently by Michael Kimmel (Angry White Men 2013) and Dick Howard (Les Ombres de l’Amérique 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Qanon and Facebook
    The Boom Before the Ban: QAnon and Facebook Ciaran O’Connor, Cooper Gatewood, Kendrick McDonald and Sarah Brandt 2 ‘THE GREAT REPLACEMENT’: THE VIOLENT CONSEQUENCES OF MAINSTREAMED EXTREMISM / Document title: About this report About NewsGuard This report is a collaboration between the Institute Launched in March 2018 by media entrepreneur and for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and the nonpartisan award-winning journalist Steven Brill and former Wall news-rating organisation NewsGuard. It analyses Street Journal publisher Gordon Crovitz, NewsGuard QAnon-related contents on Facebook during a provides credibility ratings and detailed “Nutrition period of increased activity, just before the platform Labels” for thousands of news and information websites. implemented moderation of public contents spreading NewsGuard rates all the news and information websites the conspiracy theory. Combining quantitative and that account for 95% of online engagement across the qualitative analysis, this report looks at key trends in US, UK, Germany, France, and Italy. NewsGuard products discussions around QAnon, prominent accounts in that include NewsGuard, HealthGuard, and BrandGuard, discussion, and domains – particularly news websites which helps marketers concerned about their brand – that were frequently shared alongside QAnon safety, and the Misinformation Fingerprints catalogue of contents on Facebook. This report also recommends top hoaxes. some steps to be taken by technology companies, governments and the media when seeking to counter NewsGuard rates each site based on nine apolitical the spread of problematic conspiracy theories like criteria of journalistic practice, including whether a QAnon on social media. site repeatedly publishes false content, whether it regularly corrects or clarifies errors, and whether it avoids deceptive headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGL 762 Syllabus Hate
    ENGL 762 1 THE LITERATURE OF HATE English 762 Tuesday: 2:00-4:50 / 309 Bingham Instructor: Danielle Christmas Office Hours: Thursday 3-4:30 Office: 411 Greenlaw Hall (confirm by email) E-mail: [email protected] Section: 001 Course Description: The social and political tenor of the moment has brought the normalization of white nationalist rhetoric into relief. However, Americans have always found creative ways to express a desire to exclude or eradicate the racial other. In this graduate seminar, students will look at the arc of fiction narratives that have inspired and defined contemporary hate movements in the United States. Starting with Thomas Dixon’s neo-Confederate romance The Clansman (1905), we will move through the foundational texts of white nationalism today, including Jean Raspail’s refugee apocalypse The Camp of the Saints (1973), William Pierce’s race-war account The Turner Diaries (1978), and globalization dystopias like Ward Kendall’s Hold Back This Day (2001). We will also discuss those mainstream works that have been adopted into the white nationalist canon, including Jane Austen’s Pride & Prejudice (1813) and Bret Easton Ellis’s American Psycho (1991). Finally, our discussion will be contextualized using social critiques like J.D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy (2016) and Vegas Tenold’s Everything You Love Will Burn (2018). By the end of the semester, students will have the capacity to understand the place of this literary subculture within the larger body of contemporary American cultural production and the urgent discourses of race and violence that animate it. Students should have a high tolerance for disturbing content and a spirit of critical curiosity.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms
    A report from the Center on Technology and Society OCT 2018 Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms: The Amplification of Anti-Semitic Harassment Online Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all. ABOUT CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY AND THE BELFER FELLOWS In a world riddled with cyberhate, online harassment, and misuses of technology, the Center for Technology & Society (CTS) serves as a resource to tech platforms and develops proactive solutions. Launched in 2017 and headquartered in Silicon Valley, CTS aims for global impacts and applications in an increasingly borderless space. It is a force for innovation, producing cutting-edge research to enable online civility, protect vulnerable populations, support digital citizenship, and engage youth. CTS builds on ADL’s century of experience building a world without hate and supplies the tools to make that a possibility both online and off-line. The Belfer Fellowship program supports CTS’s efforts to create innovative solutions to counter online hate and ensure justice and fair treatment for all in the digital age through fellowships in research and outreach projects. The program is made possible by a generous contribution from the Robert A. and Renée E. Belfer Family Foundation. The inaugural 2018-2019 Fellows are: • Rev. Dr. Patricia Novick, Ph.D., of the Multicultural Leadership Academy, Samuel Woolley is the research a program that brings Latino and African-American leaders together. director of the Digital Intelligence (DigIntel) Lab at IFTF, a research • Dr. Karen Schrier, an associate professor at Marist College and its associate at the Oxford Internet founding director of the Games and Emerging Media Program.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY RECEIVES an OUTPOURING of SUPPORT Hundreds Gather in Grief and Solidarity for a Multi-Faith Vigil Honouring Those Murdered at Pittsburgh Synagogue
    P6 P12 An eye-opening Israel mission • 6 P15 A diversity of Chanukah traditions • 12 Profile of poet Ellen Jaffe • 15 INSIDE TEVET 5779 Hamilton Jewish NThe voice ofe Jewishw Hamilton Dec.s 2018 After Pittsburgh COMMUNITY RECEIVES AN OUTPOURING OF SUPPORT Hundreds gather in grief and solidarity for a multi-faith vigil honouring those murdered at Pittsburgh synagogue STORY BY WENDY SCHNEIDER, THE HAMILTON JEWISH NEWS HEY CAME FROM ALL walks of life. T Politicians, clergy, and ordinary citizens of all faiths joined their Jewish brothers and sisters in grief and solidarity at a multi-faith vigil held at Temple Anshe Sholom on Oct. 30. The event was held in response to the horrific attack that took place at Pittsburgh's Tree of Life Synagogue a few days earlier. Several speakers addressed an overflow crowd of an estimated 600 people, on the themes of inclusion, support and defiance against the forces of hate and intolerance. The vigil, presented by the Hamilton Jewish Federation and the city's three main syna- gogues, was one of hundreds that took place through- PHOTO: WENDY SCHNEIDER, HAMILTON JEWISHNEWS Hundreds gathered in soidarity and support of Hamilton's Jewish community at a multi-faith vigil held at Temple out North America that week. Anshe Sholom following the shooting at Pittsburgh's Tree of Life Synagogue. HUNDREDS GATHER CONTINUES ON P4 ISRAEL'S RESILIENCE Israel is widely recognized as one of the Jewish funeral most creative and innovative countries in homes are under a the world, but the never-ending threat of great deal of pressure terror and war is testing the resiliency of today.” Israelis living on the Gaza border.
    [Show full text]
  • Uscels - Incel Awareness Exhibition 1 Cover Page
    USCELS - INCEL AWARENESS EXHIBITION 1 COVER PAGE DP607 PORTFOLIO 2 DESIGN ISSUE, CONTEXT, USER AND STAKEHOLDERS JOSHUA TUBB 16819546 3 DESIGN ANTECEDENTS AND IDEOLOGY PRODUCT DESIGN WITH PROFESSIONAL Experience BSC HONS 4 EXHIBITION MAP 5 EXHIBITION MODEL 6 DOUBLE DIAMOND PROCESS 7 RESEARCH 8 IDEATION 9 DEVELOPMENT 10 DEVELOPMENT CONT 11 TESTING INTRODUCTION This is the Portfolio task of Module 607 Design Studio 2 Design For Ideology. For this module the outcome has been a Exhibition to educate and de-stigmatise the group known as incels with the intention of helping the individuals of this group. There’s something Soviet about the way the internet names things. Stalin had portmanteaus like agitprop, politburo, and kompromat, and we have webinar, podcast, and incel, short for involuntary celibate. The word incel was invented in the late 90’s with a different meaning but has come to mean something more sinister. The word “incel” refers to a more specific community of mostly heterosexual men, centred around forums like Incel.me and r/braincells. The subculture has come into the public eye in recent years due to outbursts of violence. DESIGN ISSUE CONTEXT USERS AND STAKEHOLDERS The term “involuntary celibate” (shortened to “incel”) Incels believe a man’s sexual success is almost entirely determined by refers to self-identifying members of an online unalterable biological traits: things like his jawline, cheekbones, eye subculture based around the inability to find a socket shape and even in some cases the width of their wrists. The romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a result in their view , is that modern western society is defined by a kind state they describe as “inceldom” or “incelibacy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourses of the Fringe Right: Analysing Discourse and [De]Legitimation on Gab.Ai Alex Phillip Lyng Christiansen Aalborg Univer
    Discourses of the Fringe Right: Analysing Discourse and [De]legitimation on Gab.ai Alex Phillip Lyng Christiansen Aalborg University Author Note Alex P. L. Christiansen, School of Culture and Global Studies, Aalborg University Correspondence concerning this assignment should be addressed to Alex Christiansen, 6 Mill View House, LA1 1AU Lancaster, Lancashire Contact: [email protected] Supervised by Christina Schoux Casey ii My most sincere appreciation is owed to the following… To Christina, whose optimism and helpfulness has meant more than she knows, in the face of a difficult and ever-changing task. To Edward Dearden and Jeremy Blackburn, without whom this paper would be weirdly lacking in data. To my one and only Karolina, whose attitude to- wards my never-ending cycle of work has been remarkably patient and supporting. And finally, to Peter and Emma Thomsen, whose generous and continuous support has been invaluable and has indirectly led to many of the best things in my life. Thanks for taking a chance on me. iii Abstract Given the worrying growth of anti-Semitic and racist tendencies and actions in both Europe (Ward, 2018) and the US (Anti-Defamation League, 2018), it is important to continuously evaluate the developing communities on social media, where a majority of recruitment takes place. In spite of its massive growth, however, there has until now been very few attempts at analysing the discourse community present on the ‘alt-right’ twitter alternative, Gab.ai. As a tentative step towards rectifying this, the present study analyses the most liked, disliked and controversial sentiments on Gab.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION a Constellation of Educational Forms
    INTRODUCTION A Constellation of Educational Forms In the summer of 2018 amid mounting scandals in the Donald Trump presidency, the disturbing separation of undocumented families at the United States‒Mexico border, and a rather pathetic yet highly visible “Unite the Right 2” rally in Washington, DC, organized by neo-Nazi activists, a book chapter I had recently written on the topic of white privilege and education suddenly and for a brief and intense moment became a lightning rod of controversy. It started with a request for an interview from the online “journal” Campus Reform (CR). The website was founded by the Leadership Institute, which has an explicit agenda to increase the number of conservatives in government and the media. According to Media Bias/Fact Check, CR rates as “strongly biased” toward conservative views, is prone to using loaded words to charac- terize liberal or leftist professors, and publishes misleading reports. CR actively polices higher education, openly shaming and mocking individual professors deemed liberal or leftist (and thereby a threat to “American” values). In my own case, a staff writer contacted me via email, perhaps to discuss the chapter with me, or to obtain a comment, or at the very least, to be able to say (at the end of the eleventh-hour window she had given me to reply) that “the author could not be reached for comment” before going live; I declined to participate (by not responding). Giving CR and its “reporter” any response seemed to me to merely legitimate the source as a serious new outlet, and while they went through the motions of reaching out to me, this was an exchange in which I did not want any part.
    [Show full text]