Secuencias, 36

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Secuencias, 36 BOLLYWOOD TRAVELS. CULTURE, tarse a una mera referencia al discurso naciona- DIASPORA AND BORDER CROSSINGS lista de los versos en el contexto de la recién inde- IN POPULAR HINDI CINEMA pendizada India dentro de crecientes procesos de Rajinder Dudrah globalización que ya se percibían a mediados del Londres y Nueva York siglo XX, Dudrah realiza un breve, a la par que Routledge, 2012 sugestivo, análisis de la secuencia musical del 145 páginas filme, que compara con los títulos de crédito de la 67,96 € (Kindle) / 97,08 € (tapa dura) película Phir bhi dil hai Hindustani (Aziz Mirza, 2000), protagonizada por la estrella de Bolly- wood Shahrukh Khan: «El tema de la secuencia inicial del filme, también del mismo título, rinde homenaje a la canción de la película de 1955 en lo que respecta a sus sentimientos patrióticos, pero en el contexto de una India neo-liberalizada en el cambio de milenio. Como el filme de 1955, este también fue visto por espectadores, no solo en India, sino en las comunidades de la diáspora sudasiática, así como en cualquier otro lugar del mundo donde los circuitos de distribución y emi- sión de Bollywood fueron capaces de viajar, de forma legítima o pirateada» (p. 3). El análisis comparativo de dos películas a «Mera Joota hai Japani (Mis zapatos son través de la intertextualidad de sus secuencias japoneses) musicales, teniendo en cuenta cómo los discur- Yeh Patloon Inglistani (Estos pantalones son sos ideológicos dominantes de sus respectivos ingleses) contextos históricos contienen otros discursos Sar pe lal topi Rusi (El sombrero rojo sobre contradictorios –incluso subversivos– depen- mi cabeza es ruso) diendo de los contextos socio-culturales del Phir bhi dil hai Hindustani (Pero mi corazón amplio espectro de espectadores que accede al sigue siendo indio)». texto cinematográfico, marca la pauta del intere- sante y complejo análisis de Bollywood como El estribillo de esta canción, de la película Shri fenómeno cultural transnacional que el autor 420 (Raj Kapoor, 1955), con frecuencia se cita en ofrece a lo largo de los siete capítulos que tratan estudios que tratan el tema de la globalización y diversos aspectos de una industria cinematográ- el cine transnacional como fenómeno que no es fica en expansión que necesitaban ser estudiados exclusivo de películas contemporáneas sino que académicamente. se remonta casi a los inicios del cine. Un libro que Dentro de las variadas industrias cinemato- versa sobre los «viajes de Bollywood» a través de gráficas regionales del subcontinente asiático, el «fronteras», que no solo se refieren a demarca- cine popular en hindi se suele denominar con ciones nacionales, sino también socio-culturales, varios términos: cine de Bombay, cine comercial así como relativas a la estética cinematográfica, indio, masala film o Bollywood. Este tipo de cine contenido temático e ideología de los filmes, y ha dominado la cultura popular de masas de referidas también a cuestiones metodológicas, no India desde sus comienzos, así como el panorama podía eludir la inclusión de dicha cita. Sin limi- cultural de la diáspora india, por lo que siempre LIBROS 135 ha estado íntimamente relacionado con los dis- ránea. Asimismo, la marcada vertiente socioló- cursos de identidad nacional que engloba las dis- gica del libro hace que resulte también impres- tintas regiones, culturas y religiones del país, así cindible para aquellos que tengan interés en ana- como las comunidades de indios no residentes en lizar el impacto y la recepción de productos India (NRIs, Non-Resident Indians), tal y como culturales transnacionales en diversos sectores de señaló Majunath Pendakur en Indian Popular comunidades diaspóricas, como la del Asia meri- Cinema. Industry, Ideology and Consciousness dional, en el nuevo milenio. El estilo personal y (Hampton Press, 2003). sencillo del autor, así como la cuidada estructura El controvertido término «Bollywood» es el del libro que facilita la lectura del mismo, lo hace que más se utiliza para denominar el cine popu- accesible a todos aquellos lectores aficionados al lar de India en hindi, y hace referencia concreta- cine que deseen explorar la cultura cinematográ- mente a la industria cinematográfica de Mumbai, fica de Bollywood. aunque a veces se hace erróneamente extensivo El primer capítulo del libro se presenta como al resto de películas comerciales realizadas en el una excelente introducción a los estudios de país. Recientemente, tras la liberalización de la Bollywood desde un punto de vista cultural e economía india, el término «Bollywood» aparece, interdisciplinar, prestando especial atención a los con frecuencia, acompañado del adjetivo «glo- cambios experimentados por el cine popular en bal», como ocurre en el libro de Anandam P. Ka- hindi en el nuevo milenio. Antes de llevar a cabo voori y Aswin Punathambekar Global Bollywood el estudio propuesto, Dudrah presenta una nece- (NYU Press, 2008), pasando a designar ya no saria revisión de las definiciones de «Bollywood» solo la industria cinematográfica india, sino el propuestas por otros autores y justifica la utiliza- conjunto de prácticas culturales a través de las ción del controvertido término en su libro, aten- cuales se negocia lo que significa identidad india diendo a su utilización mediática como fenómeno (Indianness). En este sentido, «Bollywood» refleja cultural, siendo a la vez consciente de la comple- la complejidad de los discursos de identidad na- jidad del mismo (p. 7). Interesante resulta, tam- cional y transnacional de la India a través del cine bién, la metáfora del viaje que Dudrah usa en popular y sus productos culturales asociados. sentido amplio para abrir nuevos horizontes de Conocido por su indudable contribución a la análisis e incluso de enfoques metodológicos expansión del conocimiento del fenómeno cultu- interdisciplinares, los cuales ofrecen nuevas rutas ral del cine sudasiático en circuitos académicos, académicas para un fenómeno cultural que nece- Dudrah continua con su diálogo interdisciplinar sitaba ser estudiado. Dudrah consigue convencer entre cine, sociología y cultura ya presente en su al lector de la importancia de adentrarse por conocido libro Bollywood: Sociology Goes to the caminos menos transitados por los que se despla- Movies (Sage, 2006) y que esta vez ofrece a tra- zan los productos culturales de Bollywood para vés de la metáfora del viaje, que conduce a los poder dar cuenta de fenómenos sociales a distin- lectores por caminos poco transitados por los que tos niveles y en distintos contextos históricos, también se mueve el cine popular en hindi. Bolly- políticos y culturales en un mundo globalizado y wood Travels. Culture, Diaspora and Border en constante cambio. Crossings in Popular Hindi Cinema resulta de Después de la introducción, Dudrah presenta obligada lectura no solo para académicos cuya el primer escenario de cruce de fronteras como investigación se centre en cine sudasiático, sino lugar físico a la par que simbólico: la problemá- también para todos los especialistas en estudios tica frontera entre India y Pakistán. El autor ana- de cine interesados en explorar las corrientes liza dos exitosas películas estrenadas en 2004 transnacionales de la cinematografía contempo- que, a la vez que construyen una visión un tanto 136 SECUENCIAS - 36 / Segundo semestre 2012 nacionalista del conflicto desde el punto de vista ral impecable, ya que hace referencia al carácter de India, también reflejan la complejidad del posmoderno de la misma en su parodia e inter- espacio cultural de la frontera (borderland): textualidad, que enlaza con el resto de productos Main Hoon Na (Farah Khan) y Veer Zaara (Yash culturales analizados en el libro, resaltando los Chopra). El autor lleva a cabo un detallado análi- cambios principales experimentados por perso- sis textual de las escenas que se desarrollan en najes y lugares de la diáspora, así como la rela- este espacio, a la par que realiza un excelente tra- ción entre estas comunidades e India como bajo de contextualización histórica, explicando, nación de origen. A pesar de no haber resultado también, los aspectos culturales que resultan tan exitosa como se preveía, la película presenta relevantes a la hora de interpretar las escenas múltiples niveles de análisis que hacen referencia desde el prisma de la complejidad coyuntural y a dichos cambios estéticos de Bollywood en rela- yendo más allá de una primera lectura de las pelí- ción con su contexto social y cultural. Por lo culas que las encasillaría dentro de la ideología tanto, considero muy acertada la elección de esta dominante conservadora del contexto socio-polí- película para llevar a cabo el estudio del cruce tico en el que se insertan los filmes. Desde un literal y metafórico de fronteras. punto de vista fílmico y cultural, el análisis lle- Continuando con el análisis de la diáspora, vado a cabo en este capítulo resulta revelador, ya el capítulo 4 nos conduce hasta Miami, donde el que el enfoque interdisciplinar y la cuidada con- cruce de fronteras cinematográficas formales textualización –no solo histórica sino también traspasa también las fronteras del género y social, política y cultural– que el autor lleva a sexualidad, incluyendo un importante elemento cabo toca diversos y cruciales puntos que escasa- queer en la narrativa principal de la película Dos- mente se habían tratado con anterioridad. Quizá, tana (Tarun Mansukhani, 2008). Siguiendo la dicho análisis se habría visto enriquecido si el línea del capítulo 2, que invita a ir más allá de autor hubiese realizado un estudio comparativo
Recommended publications
  • Packet of Curricular Materials
    May 12, 2000 Dear Colleagues: I am one of this year’s Midwest Faculty Fellows with the Regional Worlds Program. This spring Richard Guzman, a Midwest Faculty Fellow from North Central College, and I have been involved in organizing the pedagogy session that will be part of the upcoming Regional Worlds Capstone Conference, “Mobile Geographies, Plural Histories.” The session is entitled, “New Paradigms in Area Studies Teaching,” and will be held on Saturday, May 20th from 10:00 am – 12:00 noon at the Franke Institute of the Humanities, Regenstein Library. Discussions about pedagogy have been a very important dimension of the Regional Worlds Program and our session next Saturday provides an opportunity to involve participants from this year’s program, “Diasporas, Minorities and Counter Geographies,” as well as participants from the three previous programs, “South Asia 1996-97,” “Latin America 1997-98,” and “East Asia 1998- 1999.” In planning this session we wanted to address tandem goals. First, we wanted to look at some of the specific curricular initiatives that emerged as a direct result of faculty participation in Regional Worlds. David Moore (International Studies, Macalester College], Arjun Guneratne (Anthropology, Macalester College], Jerome Levi (Sociology and Anthropology, Carleton College), Kathleen Ryor (Art History, Carleton College], and Nandini Bhattacharya (English, Valparaiso University] have kindly agreed to share syllabi of courses they developed or revised as a result of their participation in the Program. In addition, I asked them to provide us with some information contextualizing the courses in terms of Regional Worlds and/or their particular institutional frameworks. The syllabi and statements are attached.
    [Show full text]
  • De Draagbare Wikipedia Van Het Schrijven – Verhaal
    DE DRAAGBARE WIKIPEDIA VAN HET SCHRIJVEN VERHAAL BRON: WIKIPEDIA SAMENGESTELD DOOR PETER KAPTEIN 1 Gebruik, verspreiding en verantwoording: Dit boek mag zonder kosten of restricties: Naar eigen inzicht en via alle mogelijke middelen gekopieerd en verspreid worden naar iedereen die daar belangstelling in heeft Gebruikt worden als materiaal voor workshops en lessen Uitgeprint worden op papier Dit boek (en het materiaal in dit boek) is gratis door mij (de samensteller) ter beschikking gesteld voor jou (de lezer en gebruiker) en niet bestemd voor verkoop door derden. Licentie: Creative Commons Naamsvermelding / Gelijk Delen. De meeste bronnen van de gebruikte tekst zijn artikelen van Wikipedia, met uitzondering van de inleiding, het hoofdstuk Redigeren en Keuze van vertelstem. Deze informatie kon niet op Wikipedia gevonden worden en is van eigen hand. Engels In een aantal gevallen is de Nederlandse tekst te kort of non-specifiek en heb ik gekozen voor de Engelse variant. Mag dat zomaar met Wikipedia artikelen? Ja. WikiPedia gebruikt de Creative Commons Naamsvermelding / Gelijk Delen. Dit houdt in dat het is toegestaan om: Het werk te delen Het werk te bewerken Onder de volgende voorwaarden: Naamsvermelding (in dit geval: Wikipedia) Gelijk Delen (verspreid onder dezelfde licentie als Wikipedia) Link naar de licentie: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.nl Versie: Mei 2014, Peter Kaptein 2 INHOUDSOPGAVE INLEIDING 12 KRITIEK EN VERHAALANALYSE 16 Literaire stromingen 17 Romantiek 19 Classicisme 21 Realisme 24 Naturalisme 25
    [Show full text]
  • Think Film! on Current Practices and Challenges in Film Culture: a Documentation of a Student Symposium 2020
    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Adriane Meusch, Bianka-Isabell Scharmann u.a. (Hg.) Think Film! On Current Practices and Challenges in Film Culture: A Documentation of a Student Symposium 2020 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13589 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Konferenzbeitrag / conference object Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Meusch, Adriane; Scharmann, Bianka-Isabell (Hg.): Think Film! On Current Practices and Challenges in Film Culture: A Documentation of a Student Symposium. Frankfurt am Main: Zenodo 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13589. Erstmalig hier erschienen / Initial publication here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3662799 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung 4.0/ Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Attribution 4.0/ License. For more information see: Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz finden Sie hier: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ THINK THINK FILM! Edited by Adriane MeuschandBianka- Adriane Edited by Isabell Scharmann On Current Practices and Challenges in Film Culture: A Documentation of a Student Symposium Think Film! On Current Practices and Challenges in Film Culture: A Documentation of a Student Symposium Edited by Adriane Meusch & Bianka- Isabell Scharmann Frankfurt am Main, 2020 Editors Adriane Meusch and Bianka-Isabell Scharmann, in collaboration with Michelle Rafaela Kamolz https://thinkfilmsymposium.wordpress.com Copy Editor Carly Crane Graphic Design Muriel Serf (mmm.do) Bibliographic information of the German Library The German Library catalogues this publication in the German National Bibliography; detailed bibliographic information can be found on the Internet website: http://dnb.d-nb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Streams Programming Calendar Film Streams Supporters Want To
    Film Streams Programming Calendar The Ruth Sokolof Theater . July – September 2013 v7.1 Devdas 2002 Bollywood and Beyond July 26 – October 3, 2013 Devdas 2002 3 Idiots 2009 Sholay 1975 Nishabd 2007 Om Shanti Om 2007 Jalsaghar Dilwale Dulhania (The Music Room) 1958 Le Jayenge 1995 Patang 2011 Omkara 2006 Monsoon Wedding 2001 Generously supported by Sam Walker. A comprehensive overview of India’s prolific film- “Curry Western” tradition through its unforgettable assortment of action, musi- making traditions would be impossible to offer in a cal, melodrama, and comedy—and you’ll find its influence in the more recent year, much less a season. Even a ten-film spotlight DEVDAS, with its grandiosity, opulence, music, and timeless story of tragedy. focused on classics from a given era of Bollywood— But we’ve gone beyond masala film to include PATANG, whose cinematogra- Mumbai-made, Hindi-language films—would phy blends the lines between documentary and fiction, and we’ve gone beyond leave glaring omissions. So for our Bollywood and Bollywood with the classic JALSAGHAR (THE MUSIC ROOM) by the master Beyond series, we’ve put together a small sampling Bengali filmmaker Satyajit Ray. What all of these films have in common is one of cinema that’s a bit like a masala—a mixture thing: They are captivating, beautifully rendered experiences whose sights and of spices that in Indian cinema refers to a genre sounds are truly intended to be experienced on the big screen. that combines conventions into a feast. You’ll find that mix in films like SHOLAY, which birthed the See reverse side for more information and dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at Popular Muslim Films Through the Lens of Genre
    Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, Vol. IX, No. 1, 2017 0975-2935 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n1.17 Full Text: http://rupkatha.com/V9/n1/v9n117.pdf Is Islamicate a Genre? Looking at Popular Muslim Films through the Lens of Genre Asmita Das Department of Film Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata. ORCID: 0000-0002-7307-5818. Email: [email protected] Received February 25, 2017; Revised April 9, 2017; Accepted April 10, 2017; Published May 7, 2017. Abstract This essay engages with genre as a theory and how it can be used as a framework to determine whether Islamicate or the Muslim films can be called a genre by themselves, simply by their engagement with and representation of the Muslim culture or practice. This has been done drawing upon the influence of Hollywood in genre theory and arguments surrounding the feasibility / possibility of categorizing Hindi cinema in similar terms. The essay engages with films representing Muslim culture, and how they feed into the audience’s desires to be offered a window into another world (whether it is the past or the inner world behind the purdah). It will conclude by trying to ascertain whether the Islamicate films fall outside the categories of melodrama (which is the most prominent and an umbrella genre that is represented in Indian cinema) and forms a genre by itself or does the Islamicate form a sub-category within melodrama. Keywords: genre, Muslim socials, socials, Islamicate films, Hindi cinema, melodrama. 1. Introduction The close association between genre and popular culture (in this case cinema) ensured generic categories (structured by mass demands) to develop within cinema for its influence as a popular art.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollywood Cinema Show Cards: Indian Film Art from the 1950S to the 1980S
    Bollywood Cinema Show Cards: Indian Film Art from the 1950s to the 1980s This exhibition follows the historic and stylistic development of Hindi film advertising during Indian’s independence from Britain in 1947 to the 1980s—just before India entered into the global economy. Most people have heard of Bollywood cinema: the commercial film industry based in the port city of Bombay-- now called Mumbai-- on the western coast of India. The term “Bollywood” is derived from combining “Bombay” with “Hollywood” and reflects an early awareness of international cinema in India. Today Bollywood, alongside other Indian film industries, produces over 800 films a year, making India’s film industry one of the largest in the world. Most Bollywood films today follow the masala or “mixed” format, a style developed in the 1960s. 1 These fantastical films tend to be around three hours long and rely on viewers detaching themselves from an everyday reality. Plots tend to have many characters and follow non- linear narratives. Films are shot in multiple locations and the song and dance scenes, a key component of Bollywood cinema, contribute to the spectacular nature of these larger- than-life films. While Bollywood films have been studied by scholars and received much media attention, the culture of advertising has not. This exhibition seeks to change that by focusing on one specific form of advertising—the Show Card. Though sizes vary, most Show Cards are roughly ¾ of a meter long by ½ a meter wide: some horizontally or landscape oriented, others vertically or portrait. All feature colourful collages of photographic stills that have been mounted on cardboard then hand-tinted.
    [Show full text]
  • English Language and Literature Core Course VIII – Film Studies
    English Language and Literature SEMESTER V Core Course VIII – Film Studies (EN 1543) Part 2 FILM MOVEMENTS SOVIET MONTAGE (1924-1930) • Montage is a technique in film editing in which a series of shorts are edited into a sequence to compact space, time, and information. • Visual montage may combine shots to tell a story chronologically or may juxtapose images to produce an impression or to illustrate an association of ideas. • Montage technique developed early in cinema, primarily through the work of the American directors Edwin S. Porter and D.W. Griffith. Soviet Montage • Soviet Montage Montage describes cutting together images that aren’t in spatial or temporal continuity. • Director Lev Kulshov first conceptualized montage theory on the basis that one frame may not be enough to convey an idea or an emotion • •The audience are able to view two separate images and subconsciously give them a collective context. • In the 1920s, a lack of film stock meant that Soviet filmmakers often re-edited existing films or learned how to make films by deconstructing old ones rather than shooting new material. • When they did shoot film, they often had only short lengths of film left over from other productions, so they not only used short shots, they often planned them in great detail. Kuleshov Effect • Kuleshov experiment is a good example. • The basic notion that a subsequent image could affect the viewer’s interpretation of the previous one was supported by behavioral psychology theories popular at the time. • Kuleshov concluded from his experiment that editing created the opportunity to link entirely unrelated material in the minds of the viewers, who were no longer seen as simply absorbing meaning from the images, but actually creating meaning by associating the different images and drawing meaning from their juxtaposition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Karma of Chicken Curry Tibetan Masala Films and Youth Narratives of Exile
    Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale e-ISSN 2385-3042 Vol. 54 – Giugno 2018 ISSN 1125-3789 The Karma of Chicken Curry Tibetan Masala Films and Youth Narratives of Exile Mara Matta (Sapienza Università di Roma, Italia) Abstract This essay offers a preliminary study of the cultural translation practices by young Tibetan exilic filmmakers in India, whose films, rather than rejecting the masala formula offered by Bolly- wood, have tentatively adapted it to the expectations of a Tibetan diasporic audience looking for a cinema capable of attending to the escapist needs of their minds while simultaneously catering to the intimate dreams of their hearts. I contend that Tashi Wangchuk and Tsultrim Dorjee’s first long feature Phun Anu Thanu (Two Exiled Brothers, 2006) is as an original film that presents a new offer on the menu of Tibetan diasporic films, a kind of spicy curry that has been advocated as a timely necessity and a yet-to-be-fulfilled desire. Summary 1 Introduction. – 2 Filmmaking Practices by Tibetans in Exile. – 3 In Between the Local and the Global: Tibetan masala Films and the Politics of Cinematic Pleasure. – 4 Phun Anu Thanu (India 2006): The First Instance of a Thinglish Film. – 5 Conclusions. Keywords Tibetan diaspora. Hindi cinema. Exilic filmmaking. Cultural identity. Hybridity. 1 Introduction The exile mix of Tibetan, Hindi, and English is something I like to call ‘Thinglish’ untraditional, but it works. This is a key to Tibetan survival beyond the land of snows – we approach what is around us and com- bine it with what we need and know to define a space uniquely ours.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Transnational Film Remakes
    INTRODUCTION: TRANSNATIONAL FILM REMAKES Iain Robert Smith and Constantine Verevis On 14 April 2016, Paramount Pictures released the first image of actress Scarlett Johansson in the lead role of the science-fiction film Ghost in the Shell (2017). This promotional image generated a great deal of controversy online, with much of the attention focused upon the decision to cast a white actress in the central role of cyborg Major Motoko Kusanagi. This criticism was part of a wider critique of ‘whitewashing’ within Hollywood where white actors are cast in non-white roles – other notable examples include Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961) and Emma Stone in Aloha (2015) – yet this particular instance was especially controversial as Ghost in the Shell is a Hollywood remake of a 1995 Japanese anime (and manga) and therefore raised further issues surrounding planned changes to the source text. In fact, many of the initial reports on the controversy (Abad-Santos 2016; Child 2016; Loughrey 2016) cited a series of tweets by comic-book writer Jon Tsuei in which he expressed concern that the Hollywood remake would lose the cultural resonance that the source text’s themes have with Japan’s post-World War II history. Central to Tsuei’s argument was the notion that Ghost in the Shell is a text deeply rooted in a specific era of Japanese technological development, and that it should therefore be understood as ‘inherently a Japanese story, not a universal one’ (Tsuei 2016a). Consequently, Tsuei’s objection was not only to the casting of a white actress in the lead role but also to the very decision to produce a Hollywood remake, arguing that ‘You can “Westernize” the story if you want, but at that point it is no longer Ghost in The Shell because the story is simply not Western’ (Tsuei 2016b).
    [Show full text]
  • Amar Akbar Anthony • BOLLYWOOD, BROTHERHOOD, and the NATION • William Elison Christianlee Novetzke Andy Rotman
    Amar Akbar Anthony • BOLLYWOOD, BROTHERHOOD, AND THE NATION • William Elison ChristianLee Novetzke Andy Rotman Ill Ill HarvardUniversity Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2016 Copyright© 2016 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First printing Film stills reproduced from Amar Akbar Anthony (1977), directed and produced by Manmohan Desai. Hirawatjain & Co./ MKD Films/ Manmohan Films. Promotional posters in the Introduction and Appendix for Manmohan Desai's Amar Akbar Anthony (1977). Hirawatjain & Co./ MKD Films/ Manmohan Films. Reproduced from the collection of Andy Rotman. Libraryof Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-674-50448-6 (hardcover) Introduction OUTRIGHT HOKUM HE YEAR 1977 was a tumultuous one in India. The state of emer­ T gency that Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had declared in 1975, allowing her to rule by decree, at last came to an end. During those twenty-one months of autocratic rule, the government's attempts to en­ force order led to many excesses: political opponents were imprisoned, the press was censored, and civil liberties were curtailed. When Mrs. Gandhi finallycalled for elections, the political opposition joined forcesto mount a campaign on the theme of "democracy versus dictatorship." The elec­ tions delivered Mrs. Gandhi a resounding loss and brought in the first non-Congress Party government since Independence. The mood of the times was mixed. There was a renewed feeling of hope, but also pent-up frustration and resentment. Going to the movies gave the nation a way to escape from this trou­ bled reality.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Indian Cinema.Pdf
    CHAPTER – 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF INDIAN CINEMA Indian films are unquestionably the most –seen movies in the world. Not just talking about the billion- strong audiences in India itself, where 12 million people are said to go to the cinema every day, but of large audiences well beyond the Indian subcontinent and the Diaspora, in such unlikely places as Russia, China, the Middle East, the Far East Egypt, Turkey and Africa. People from very different cultural and social worlds have a great love for Indian popular cinema, and many have been Hindi Films fans for over fifty years. Indian cinema is world – famous for the staggering amount of films it produces: the number is constantly on the increase, and recent sources estimate that a total output of some 800 films a year are made in different cities including Madrass , Bangalore , Calcutta and Hyderabad . Of this astonishing number, those films made in Bombay, in a seamless blend of Hindi and Urdu, have the widest distribution within India and Internationally. The two sister languages are spoken in six northern states and understood by over 500 million people on the Indian sub – continent alone – reason enough for Hindi and Urdu to be chosen above the fourteen official Indian languages to become the languages of Indian Popular cinema when sound came to the Indian Silver screen in 1931 . Silent Era – The cinematographe (from where we have the name cinema) invented by the Lumiere brothers functioned better the Kinetoscope of Edison and Dickson. The Lumiere brothers who invented the cinematographe started projection of short (very short, one to two minutes long) films for the Parsian public on November 28, 1895.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstructing Masculinities in Sibi Malayil's Devadoothan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND TRANSLATION STUDIES (IJELR) A QUARTERLY, INDEXED, REFEREED AND PEER REVIEWED OPEN ACCESS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL http://www.ijelr.in (Impact Factor : 5.9745) (ICI) KY PUBLICATIONS RESEARCH ARTICLE ARTICLE Vol. 7. Issue.2. 2020 (Apr-June) GENDERING CINEMATIC SUCCESS: DECONSTRUCTING MASCULINITIES IN SIBI MALAYIL’S DEVADOOTHAN (2000) ARYA M. P.1, Dr. BETSY PAUL C.2 1,2Postgraduate Department of English St. Aloysius College, Elthuruth, Thrissur, Kerala, India ABSTRACT Though the representation of women in Malayalam cinema has been under constant theoretical scrutiny, their male counterparts have not been endowed with much attention. Masculinities, being an offshoot of feminist theoretical undertakings, have proved to be a profound area of research that has brought forth innovative perspectives of understanding the men on (and off) screen. This research paper is an Article information Received:07/04/2020 attempt to read the nature of masculinities portrayed in the fantasy musical Accepted: 27/04/2020 Malayalam film Devadoothan (2000) to study the influence that the gendering process Published online: 30/04/2020 has in deciding the success of a film. The theoretical framework is informed by the doi: 10.33329/ijelr.7.2.40 defining theories of hegemonic masculinity suggested by Raewyn Connell and the theory of the abject given by Julia Kristeva. The major findings of the paper suggest how ideal masculinity is ideologically constructed and accepted as the norm depending on a given cultural context, and any deviation from the norm has existence only in relation with it. Devadoothan exemplifies the negative impact that the dominance of deviant masculinity may induce in defining the success of a film.
    [Show full text]