DOCSLIB.ORG

FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE–STD–1137–2014 April 2014 _______________________________ Supersedes DOE-STD-1137-2007 September 2007 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1137-2014 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ ii DOE-STD-1137-2014 INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv DOE-STD-1137-2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL ..................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................... vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................... 1 APPLICABILITY .............................................................................................................. 1 IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................................ 3 EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 4 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................. 7 BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE .............................................................................. 8 REQUIRED TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES .................................................................. 9 Section I. DOE FIRE PROTECTION COMPETENCIES ........................................ 10 Section II. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING COMPETENCIES ....................... 13 Section III. SAFETY SYSTEM OVERSIGHT OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM(S) COMPETENCIES ................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................. 17 Proficiency Points ...................................................................................................... 18 Society of Fire Protection Engineers ......................................................................... 20 CONCLUDING MATERIAL ........................................................................................... 21 v DOE-STD-1137-2014 INTENTIONALLY BLANK vi DOE-STD-1137-2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The U.S. DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is the sponsor for this Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS). The sponsor is responsible for coordinating the development and/or review of the FAQS by subject matter experts to ensure that the technical content of the Standard is accurate and adequate for Department-wide application for those involved in the Fire Protection Engineering program. The sponsor, in coordination with the Federal Technical Capability Panel, is also responsible for ensuring the FAQS is maintained current. The following subject matter experts participated in the development and/or review of this qualification standard: Jim Bisker DOE HSS Craig Christenson DOE ORP Matthew Cole DOE SC Michael Collopy DOE NNSA SSO Leonard Farello DOE NNSA (Team Lead) James Harris DOE SR Hank Kloeckler DOE NNSA NPO Jim Landmesser DOE EM Bill Schleyer DOE NNSA Sharon Steele DOE NNSA Mark Sundie DOE NNSA NPO vii DOE-STD-1137-2014 INTENTIONALLY BLANK viii DOE-STD-1137-2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD (FAQS) FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING PURPOSE DOE Order (O) 426.1 Chg. 1, Federal Technical Capability, commits the Department to continuously strive for technical excellence. The Technical Qualification Program (TQP), along with the supporting technical qualification standards, complements the personnel processes that support the Department’s drive for technical excellence. In support of this goal, the competency requirements defined in the technical qualification standards should be aligned with and integrated into the recruitment and staffing processes for technical positions. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) minimum qualifications standards will be greatly enhanced by application of appropriate materials from the FAQS. The primary purpose of the TQP is to ensure that employees have the requisite technical competency to support the mission of the Department. The TQP forms the basis for the development and assignment of DOE personnel responsible for ensuring the safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. The technical qualification standards are not intended to replace the OPM qualifications standards nor other Departmental personnel standards, rules, plans, or processes. However, the technical qualification standards should form the primary basis for developing vacancy announcements, qualification requirements, crediting plans, interviewing questions, and other criteria associated with the recruitment, selection, and internal placement of technical personnel. APPLICABILITY Fire protection engineers use science and technology to evaluate the effects of fires to protect workers, public, people, environment, and property. They analyze how facilities are used, how fires start and grow, and how fire and smoke affect people, buildings and property. Fire protection engineers evaluate many facets of the fire protection field. These include preventing and/or reducing fire consequences, reducing loss of life and property impacts of fire by applied engineering fundamentals, research, fire hazard analyses, design of fire protection/prevention systems for industrial and nuclear complexes and processes, detection and suppression of fires, fire investigation, controls for flammable and combustible liquids, unique pyrophoric materials, other highly volatile materials, public and industrial fire department organizations, fire department incident command systems, emergency medical requirements, fire ground tactics, confined space requirements, and hazardous material responses. As a result of fire being a dominant risk in nuclear facilities, fire protection engineers must be familiar with industry technical codes, standards, and practices to ensure DOE liabilities are protected from the inherent risks of fire. This includes knowledge of and participation in activities that ensure nuclear fire safety including the review of safety analysis reports, safety evaluation reports, technical safety requirements, unreviewed safety question process, the acceptance of administrative controls, and hazard categorization and accident analysis techniques. In addition, since DOE fire safety programs include critical parameters related to emergency services, fire protection engineers must possess the competencies for oversight of fire department operations related to the program, including the technical basis governing the baseline needs assessment 1 DOE-STD-1137-2014 and contents of the relevant National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes and standards. DOE-O-426.1 Chg.1, states that “DOE offices and organizations must ensure that their Federal employees are appropriately trained and technically capable of carrying out their responsibilities.” DOE-O-420.1C and DOE-STD-1066-2012 specify the functional responsibilities for DOE fire protection programs. This FAQS is necessary to provide reasonable assurance that these fire safety and emergency services-related responsibilities are being performed by appropriately qualified individuals. The Department also recognizes a need to define a separate category of competencies for Federal engineers who are assigned safety system oversight of specific fire protection systems but provide no other related fire protection engineering oversight functions. The Fire Protection Engineering FAQS establishes common functional area competency requirements in Sections I and II for all DOE fire protection engineers who provide a wide variety of duties related to fire safety and fire protection engineering including assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities. Section III also includes competencies for engineers assigned to conduct oversight of specific safety-related fire protection system(s) but perform no other fire protection engineering responsibilities. The technical FAQS has been developed as a tool to assist DOE Program and Field Offices in the development and implementation of the TQP in their organization. For ease of transportability of qualifications between DOE elements, Program and Field Offices must use this FAQS without modification or addition to competency statements or Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSA’s). Additionally, needed office-/site-/facility-/-specific qualification standards, handled separately, supplement this technical FAQS and establish unique operational competency requirements at the headquarters or field element, site, or facility level. Additional field element competencies may include: Site fire water supply; Locations where safety class or safety significant fire protection systems are provided; Types of fire protection systems employed at the site; Contractor’s fire protection program; Procedure for processing exemptions and equivalencies; Differing professional opinion process; Hazard category of key nuclear and radiological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smoke Alarms in US Home Fires Marty Ahrens February 2021
    Smoke Alarms in US Home Fires Marty Ahrens February 2021 Copyright © 2021 National Fire Protection Association® (NFPA®) Key Findings Smoke alarms were present in three-quarters (74 percent) of the injuries from fires in homes with smoke alarms occurred in properties reported homei fires in 2014–2018. Almost three out of five home with battery-powered alarms. When present, hardwired smoke alarms fire deathsii were caused by fires in properties with no smoke alarms operated in 94 percent of the fires considered large enough to trigger a (41 percent) or smoke alarms that failed to operate (16 percent). smoke alarm. Battery-powered alarms operated 82 percent of the time. Missing or non-functional power sources, including missing or The death rate per 1,000 home structure fires is 55 percent lower in disconnected batteries, dead batteries, and disconnected hardwired homes with working smoke alarms than in homes with no alarms or alarms or other AC power issues, were the most common factors alarms that fail to operate. when smoke alarms failed to operate. Of the fire fatalities that occurred in homes with working smoke Compared to reported home fires with no smoke alarms or automatic alarms, 22 percent of those killed were alerted by the device but extinguishing systems (AES) present, the death rate per 1,000 reported failed to respond, while 11 percent were not alerted by the operating fires was as follows: alarm. • 35 percent lower when battery-powered smoke alarms were People who were fatally injured in home fires with working smoke present, but AES was not, alarms were more likely to have been in the area of origin and • 51 percent lower when smoke alarms with any power source involved in the ignition, to have a disability, to be at least 65 years were present but AES was not, old, to have acted irrationally, or to have tried to fight the fire themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems
    Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems OSHA 3256-09R 2015 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication provides a general overview of a particular standards- related topic. This publication does not alter or determine compliance responsibilities which are set forth in OSHA standards and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Moreover, because interpretations and enforcement policy may change over time, for additional guidance on OSHA compliance requirements the reader should consult current administrative interpretations and decisions by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the courts. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory-impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY) number: 1-877-889-5627. This guidance document is not a standard or regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations. It contains recommendations as well as descriptions of mandatory safety and health standards. The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to assist employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to comply with safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by OSHA or by a state with an OSHA-approved state plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Is EE Right for You?
    Erik Jonsson School of Engggineering and The Un ivers ity o f Texas a t Da llas Computer Science Is EE Right for You? • “Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.” • Now that you are here, diii?id you make the right choice? • Electrical engineering is a challenging and satisfying profession. That does not mean it is easy. In fact, with the possible exceptions of medicine or law, it is the MOST difficult. • There are some things you need to consider if you really, really want to be an engineer. • We will consider a few today. EE 1202 Lecture #1 – Why Electrical Engineering? 1 © N. B. Dodge 01/12 Erik Jonsson School of Engggineering and The Un ivers ity o f Texas a t Da llas Computer Science Is EE Right for You (2)? • Why did you decide to be an electrical engineer? – Parents will pay for engineering education (it’s what they want). – You like math and science. – A relative is an engineer and you like him/her. – You want to challenge yourself, and engineering seems challenging. – You think you are creative and love technology. – You want to make a difference in society . EE 1202 Lecture #1 – Why Electrical Engineering? 2 © N. B. Dodge 01/12 Erik Jonsson School of Engggineering and The Un ivers ity o f Texas a t Da llas Computer Science The High School “Science Student” Problem • In high school, you were FAR above the average. – And you probably didn’t study too hard, right? • You liked science and math, and they weren’t terribly hard.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotics Engineer
    CONTENTS Robotics Engineer at a Glance 6 Introduction 7 Turning Science Fiction into Reality Chapter One 11 What Does a Robotics Engineer Do? Chapter Two 18 How Do You Become a Robotics Engineer? Chapter Three 26 What Skills and Personal Qualities Matter Most —and Why? Chapter Four 31 What Is It Like to Work as a Robotics Engineer? Chapter Five 37 Advancement and Other Job Opportunities Chapter Six 42 What Does the Future Hold for Robotics Engineers? Chapter Seven 49 Interview with a Robotics Engineer Source Notes 53 Find Out More 56 Index 59 Picture Credits 63 About the Author 64 5 ROBOTICS ENGINEER AT A GLANCE te’s Ba cia che so ee de lo As gr gr r’s de ee l D o r o o o t d c h n e t c o a le g s r r m a e a h v t o e l i e g i p u i q H d e Personal Minimum Educational Qualities Requirements Problem solving Creativity Working Conditions Attention to detail Indoors Strong science, math, and computer- programming skills Median Salary $81,591 Percent job increase by 278,000* 2024 Number of jobs *Numbers are for mechanical 5% engineers, a group that includes robotics engineers. Future Job Outlook Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook. www.bls.gov. 6 CHAPTER 3 What Skills and Personal Qualities Matter Most—and Why? First and foremost, robotics engineers must be very good prob- lem solvers. They must have suffi cient technical skill to recognize and understand a problem and enough creativity to think up an original solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Photonic Design Engineer
    Photonic Design Engineer Are you looking for the ultimate startup challenge? Have you always wanted to transform innovative technology into real products? Are you ready to join OPTIUS among the first employees with all the advantages and opportunities? Optius is a new startup with the vision to transform the field of efficient AI computations by using optical computing. By joining OPTIUS, you are contributing to a growing team of motivated entrepreneurs and researchers passionate about bringing this vision into reality. The Photonic Design Engineer role will involve the design, optimization, and layout of photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and photonic devices. Your opportunity and benefits: • Solve problems by commercializing cutting edge technology – Major impact! • Mentorship, coaching and support – we are here for you! • Cool Startup environment – celebrations, endless lattes, healthy snacks What we offer: • Competitive compensation package • Opportunity for growth and personal development • Insurance benefits such as health, dental and vision • Cool Startup environment – celebrations, endless coffee, healthy snacks • Lunch and Learns What your day-today will look like: • Design and optimize photonic integrated circuits (PIC’s) • Layout photonic devices with common EDA • Conduct numerical electromagnetic simulation of photonic devices • Interacting with photonic foundries to understand design environment and rules • Designing optical bench experiments for device characterization • Collaborating with the team on research and development
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Development in Fire Suppression Systems
    Proceedings, 5th AOSFST, Newcastle, Australia, 2001 Editors: M.A. Delichatsios, B.Z. Dlugogorski and E.M. Kennedy RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS A. Kim Institute for Research in Construction National Research Council Canada CANADA ABSTRACT With halon phase-out, there has been a major thrust to find new advanced fire suppression systems in recent years. Some of the newly developed fire suppression systems include halocarbon and inert gaseous agents, water mist systems, compressed-air-foam systems, and aerosol and gas generators. This paper gives a brief description of the newly developed fire suppression systems, and provides technical information on the fire suppression performance of each system as well as the limitations or concerns related to using the new suppression systems. INTRODUCTION The traditional means of providing fire suppression in buildings is a sprinkler system. However, water is not a suitable suppression medium for all types of fires. Water, when sprayed in coarse droplets such as in sprinkler spray, is not effective in suppressing liquid fuel fires. Also, in some cases, water damage is a concern because of the large amount of water used for sprinkler systems. In the 1940’s, an effort was made to develop more effective fire suppression agents. The first systematic search for effective gaseous fire suppressants can be traced to the late 1940s when the Purdue Research Foundation conducted an extensive study of more than 60 chemical compounds for the U.S. army1. This study led to the development of halon chemicals as a superior performing suppression agent. Halon is a chemical agent, which combines hydrogen, carbon, chlorine and bromine atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Prevention Strategies Guide
    A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildfire Prevention Sponsored by United States Department of Agriculture Strategies United States Department of the Interior National Association of State Foresters PMS 455 March 1998 NFES 1572 Wildfire Prevention Strategies i - WILDFIRE PREVENTION STRATEGIES Preface This Wildfire Prevention Guide is a project of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. This is one in a series designed to provide information and guidance for personnel who have interests and/or responsibilities in fire prevention. Each guide in the series addresses an individual component of a fire prevention program. In addition to providing insight and useful information, each guide suggests implementation strategies and examples for utilizing this information. Each Wildfire Prevention Guide has been developed by Fire Prevention Specialists and subject matter experts in the appropriate area. The goal of this series is to improve and enhance wildfire prevention programs and to facilitate the achievement of NWCG program goals. NWCG Wildfire Prevention Guide development: • Conducting School Programs (1996) • Event Management (1996) • Wildfire Prevention Marketing (1996) • Wildfire Prevention and the Media (1998) • Wildfire Prevention Strategies • Effective Wildfire Prevention Patrol • Recreation Areas • Exhibits and Displays • Equipment, Industrial and Construction Operations • Show Me Trips and Tours WILDFIRE PREVENTION STRATEGIES Preface - ii iii - WILDFIRE PREVENTION STRATEGIES Contents 1.0 Introduction ...........................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Position Description
    position description Date: September 2017 Title: Engineer 1 Department: Biomedical Engineering School: Case School of Engineering Location: Bingham 308 Supervisor Name and Title: Ron Triolo, Professor POSITION OBJECTIVE Under general supervision, perform engineering objectives as a member of multidisciplinary research and development teams designing and investigating new medical devices and restorative technologies, and provide high level computing infrastructure support. Responsible for microprocessor, mobile device, or computer based software system design, testing and operation on specific research and development projects for new assistive technologies for individuals with neuro-musculo-skeletal disabilities, limb loss or cognitive dysfunction. The engineer will apply methods and techniques, adjust and correlate data, determine errors in results, and follow the operation through a series of related steps to completion. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS 1. Develop embedded control and operating systems for new and emerging assistive technologies and medical devices, and create both low and high level user and clinician interfaces. (20%) 2. Set system processing specifications, design and verify software operation of new computer- microprocessor- or mobile computing platform-based assistive technologies. (20%) 3. Construct embedded applications and integrate information from networks of distributed sensors in new medical devices. (20%) 4. Identify the work to be done to fulfill project requirements and objectives, plan and carry out the procedural and technical steps required, seek assistance as needed, independently coordinate work efforts with outside parties, and characteristically submit only completed work. (10%) 5. Design, maintain and interrogate databases for research-related operational information. (10%) 6. Fully document, test and validate design and system performance according to standard design controls and quality system practices, including incident reporting, error/bug tracking and repair, and version/release control.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineer I/Ii/Iii
    ENGINEER I/II/III DEFINITION Under direct and general supervision, performs professional civil engineering work in the planning, design, technical investigation, inspection, and construction of projects in several areas of public works and civil engineering, and performs related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Receives general supervision from assigned supervisory and managerial staff. Exercises no direct supervision of staff. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS Engineer I/II/III is a flexibly-staffed class series. Advancement from the Engineer I level to the II level is at the discretion of the appointing authority, provided that the following criteria are met: (1) the minimum qualifications and time-in-grade requirements, (2) demonstration of the ability to independently perform the full scope of the assigned duties. Advancement from the Engineer II level to the III level is at the discretion of the appointing authority, provided that the following criteria are met: (1) the minimum qualifications and time-in-grade requirements, (2) demonstration of the ability to independently perform the full scope of the assigned duties. Engineer I is the entry level engineer classification. Incumbents perform less complex office and field civil engineering work under direct supervision in preparation for advancement to the journey level of Engineer II. Engineer II is the advanced level class in the engineering series, not requiring registration. Positions in this class are flexibly staffed and are normally filled by advancement from the lower class of Engineer I, or if filled from the outside, require prior professional level experience and possession of an Engineer-in- Training Certificate. Incumbents in this class work under general direction and perform moderately difficult professional engineering work in civil engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Safety Can Make Their Own Property — and Their Neighborhood — Much Safer from Wildfire
    Every year, wildfires burn across the U.S., and more and more people are living where wildfires are a real Wildland risk. But by working together, residents Fire Safety can make their own property — and their neighborhood — much safer from wildfire. Action steps for around your home: AND • CLEAR leaves and other vegetative debris from roofs, gutters, porches and decks. This helps prevent embers DON’T from igniting your home. FOrGET... • REMOVE dead vegetation and other items from under your deck or porch, and within 10 feet of the house. The more actions a • SCREEN in areas below patios and decks with wire community takes, the mesh to prevent debris and combustible materials from more fire adapted it accumulating. becomes. Learn how you • REMOVE flammable materials (wood piles, propane can make a difference in tanks) within 30 feet of your home’s foundation and your community. Visit outbuildings, including garages and sheds. If it can www.fireadapted.org catch fire, don’t let it touch your house, deck or porch. and www.firewise.org for • Wildfire can spread to tree tops. PRUNE trees so the more information. lowest branches are 6 to 10 feet from the ground. • KEEP your lawn hydrated and maintained. If it is brown, cut it down to reduce fire intensity. Dry grass and shrubs are fuel for wildfire. • Don’t let debris and lawn cuttings linger. DISPOSE of these items quickly to reduce fuel for fire. • INSPECT shingles or roof tiles. Replace or repair the FACT shingles that are loose or missing to prevent ember penetration.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]