Ethical Record Vol
The Ethical Record Vol. 89 No. 2 FEBRUARY 1 984 EDITORIAL of hand—no clear-cut issues, no Think, Discuss, Define wide enough consensus. But it is IN THE STREAM of information winter and the weather dithers cold about events that assails those of or wet; days are too short. us who believe we keep (even a Of course decisions are being little) abreast of those events and made, based on assumptions about the news, can we deduce in what the needs of people, about their direction 1984, advancing apace, is nature and, sometimes, tentatively, going? What happenings will on the future. These decisions will become the historical bench- in fact, seriatim, determine what marks? Can we discern the valid happens (that's why such things are from the outpourings about some so important—though it does not non-event, distinguish the accuracy mean that what is is intended to of the optimistic or pessimistic happen will do so). prognostications? At South Place we have the self- It is bad enough looking back imposed duty to think; helped by and trying to determine what was the most able lecturers we are able of importance in the past—or to to muster: maybe to define con- look forward to try to predict cepts, elucidate situations, explore likely developments. In the test- attitudes, correlate information, tube of actuality itself, the suggest necessary actions. This (chemical) reactions are too close issue contains a number of contri- and confusing! butions of importance in this On the economic front, hints of respect—both from lecturers and "revivals" are made, then with- by members: and, at the meetings, drawn; fears of disasters appear discussions continue to be lively and fade again; in politics a feel- and, largely, coherent—lecturers ing grows that things are often out Concluded on page 2 CONTENTS Coming to Conway Hall: Tom Evans, Joan Freedman, Peter Hcales, Stephen Houseman, Marcia Saunders Anthony Smith, Barbara Smoker, Harry Stopes-Roe .
[Show full text]