Position of the Understanding Theirtaxonomy and Applying It To
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry. -
A First Contribution to the Knowledge of Mycetozoa from Aveyron (France)
Carnets natures, 2021, vol. 8 : 67-81 A First Contribution to the knowledge of Mycetozoa from Aveyron (France) Jonathan Cazabonne¹, Michel Ferrières² et Jean-Louis Menos³ Abstract A first official taxonomic checklist of myxomycetes from the French department Aveyron is presented. As the result of data collected by the Mycological and Botanical Association of Aveyron (AMBA), literature and online research, a total of 21 species representing 14 genera, 7 families and 5 orders, were recorded. The following information for each taxon was reported: Latin name, author(s), Basionym, locality (if known) and record sources. Macrophotographs of some new records are also appended. This work is a contribution to the knowledge of myxomycetes of Aveyron, which will eventually be integrated into a national checklist project of French myxomycetes. Key words: Biodiversity, inventory, taxonomy, Myxomycetes, Occitanie. Résumé Une première contribution à la connaissance des Mycetozoa de l’Aveyron (France) Une première liste officielle sur les Myxomycètes du département français de l’Aveyron est présentée. Au total, 21 espèces représentant 14 genres, 7 familles et 5 ordres, ont été listées, grâce aux données collectées par l’Association Mycologique et Botanique de l’Aveyron (AMBA) et à un travail de recherche bibliographique. Les informations suivantes pour chaque taxon ont été indiquées : nom latin, auteur(s), basionyme, localité (si connue) et les références. Des macrophotographies de quelques nouveaux taxa aveyronnais sont aussi annexées. Ce travail est une contribution à la connaissance des myxomycètes d’Aveyron, qui sera éventuellement intégré à un projet de checklist nationale des Myxomycètes de France. Mots clés : Biodiversité, inventaire, taxonomie, Myxomycètes, Occitanie. -
Slime Moulds
Queen’s University Biological Station Species List: Slime Molds The current list has been compiled by Richard Aaron, a naturalist and educator from Toronto, who has been running the Fabulous Fall Fungi workshop at QUBS between 2009 and 2019. Dr. Ivy Schoepf, QUBS Research Coordinator, edited the list in 2020 to include full taxonomy and information regarding species’ status using resources from The Natural Heritage Information Centre (April 2018) and The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (February 2018); iNaturalist and GBIF. Contact Ivy to report any errors, omissions and/or new sightings. Based on the aforementioned criteria we can expect to find a total of 33 species of slime molds (kingdom: Protozoa, phylum: Mycetozoa) present at QUBS. Species are Figure 1. One of the most commonly encountered reported using their full taxonomy; common slime mold at QUBS is the Dog Vomit Slime Mold (Fuligo septica). Slime molds are unique in the way name and status, based on whether the species is that they do not have cell walls. Unlike fungi, they of global or provincial concern (see Table 1 for also phagocytose their food before they digest it. details). All species are considered QUBS Photo courtesy of Mark Conboy. residents unless otherwise stated. Table 1. Status classification reported for the amphibians of QUBS. Global status based on IUCN Red List of Threatened Species rankings. Provincial status based on Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre SRank. Global Status Provincial Status Extinct (EX) Presumed Extirpated (SX) Extinct in the -
Biodiversity of Plasmodial Slime Moulds (Myxogastria): Measurement and Interpretation
Protistology 1 (4), 161–178 (2000) Protistology August, 2000 Biodiversity of plasmodial slime moulds (Myxogastria): measurement and interpretation Yuri K. Novozhilova, Martin Schnittlerb, InnaV. Zemlianskaiac and Konstantin A. Fefelovd a V.L.Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, b Fairmont State College, Fairmont, West Virginia, U.S.A., c Volgograd Medical Academy, Department of Pharmacology and Botany, Volgograd, Russia, d Ural State University, Department of Botany, Yekaterinburg, Russia Summary For myxomycetes the understanding of their diversity and of their ecological function remains underdeveloped. Various problems in recording myxomycetes and analysis of their diversity are discussed by the examples taken from tundra, boreal, and arid areas of Russia and Kazakhstan. Recent advances in inventory of some regions of these areas are summarised. A rapid technique of moist chamber cultures can be used to obtain quantitative estimates of myxomycete species diversity and species abundance. Substrate sampling and species isolation by the moist chamber technique are indispensable for myxomycete inventory, measurement of species richness, and species abundance. General principles for the analysis of myxomycete diversity are discussed. Key words: slime moulds, Mycetozoa, Myxomycetes, biodiversity, ecology, distribu- tion, habitats Introduction decay (Madelin, 1984). The life cycle of myxomycetes includes two trophic stages: uninucleate myxoflagellates General patterns of community structure of terrestrial or amoebae, and a multi-nucleate plasmodium (Fig. 1). macro-organisms (plants, animals, and macrofungi) are The entire plasmodium turns almost all into fruit bodies, well known. Some mathematics methods are used for their called sporocarps (sporangia, aethalia, pseudoaethalia, or studying, from which the most popular are the quantita- plasmodiocarps). -
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D. -
Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity
Glime, J. M. 2019. Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological 3-1-1 Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SLIME MOLDS: BIOLOGY AND DIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS What are Slime Molds? ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Identification Difficulties ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1- Reproduction and Colonization ........................................................................................................................... 3-1-5 General Life Cycle ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-6 Seasonal Changes ......................................................................................................................................... 3-1-7 Environmental Stimuli ............................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 Light .................................................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 pH and Volatile Substances -
Southeast Asian Myxomycetes. I. Thailand and Burma' DON R
Southeast Asian Myxomycetes. I. Thailand and Burma' DON R. REYNOLDS2 and CONSTANTINE J. ALEXOPOULOS2 TROPICAL SOUTHEAST ASIA includes the Phillip Overeem, 1922 ; Penzig, 1898; Raciborski, 1884; pines, the Indo-Malay Archipelago and Penin Zollinger, 1844). Chip (1921) and Sanderson sula, Eastern Indochina, and parts of Thailand (1922) published from Singapore and the lower and Burma (Richards, 1952). Europeans initi Malay Peninsula." Other collections were studied ated the modern phase of botanical exploration abroad (Emoto, 1931 b; Lister, 1931; Saccardo in this region. The floristics were done either and Paoletti, 1888). In the Philippines, though locally by resident foreign botanists or by spe some mycological work has been done, most of cialists in their native country, working with the plant taxonomists who have worked there contributed materials. That which the early resi have known little about the fungi. The Myxo dents could not competently identify was sent mycetes of Indochina are completely unknown largely to European and American specialists. in the literature. The specimens, of necessity, had to be dried or The present collections are being treated in otherwise preserved for a long sea journey. As a two parts. This paper deals with the material consequence many prominent mycologists pub from Thailand and Burma; the second part con lished on material they knew only from her cerns collections from the Philippines and will barium specimens. In spite of the disadvantages be submitted for publication to the Philippine of possible misinterpretation and duplication of Agriculturist. work, it is fortunate that this procedure became Heim (1962) refers briefly to an abundance prevalent; the duplicates now in the herbaria of of Myxomycetes in Thailand. -
Myxomycetes) to Create a Global Web-Based Herbarium
Proposal for the GBIF DIGIT Programme 2004 Linking local databases for collections of plasmodial slime moulds (Myxomycetes) to create a global web-based herbarium Principal Investigator / Managing Institution Dr. Martin Schnittler, Botanical Institute and Botanical Garden, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Grimmer Str. 88, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany (in cooperation with M) Tel.: +49-3834-864123, Fax: +49-3834-864114, e-mail: [email protected] Partner Institutions Belgium: Herbarium BR Dr. J. Rammeloo, Director, research; A. Bogaerts, curator, National Botanic Garden of Belgium, Domein van Bouchout, 1860 Meise J. Rammeloo: Tel.: +32-2260-0928, Fax: +32-2260-0945, e-mail: [email protected] A. Bogaerts: Tel.: +32-2260-0935, Fax: +32-2260-0945, e-mail: [email protected] Germany: Herbarium M Dr. D. Triebel, curator, in cooperation with M. Schnittler, research, Botanical State Collection Munich, Menzinger Str. 67, D-80638 Munich, Tel. +49-089-17861-252, Fax +49-089-17861-193, e-mail: [email protected] Russia: Herbarium LE Dr. Y.K. Novozhilov, research/curator, V.L. Komarov Institute of Botany, Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory for Systematics and Geography of Fungi, Prof. Popov Street, 2, 197376 St. Petersburg Tel.: +07-812-234-8472, Fax: +07-812-234-4512, e-mail: [email protected] Spain: Herbarium MA Dr. C. Lado, research, M. Dueñas, curator, Real Jardin Botanico, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid Tel.: +34-91-420-3017, Fax: +34-91-420-0157, e-mail: [email protected] U.S.A.: Herbarium UARK (in cooperation with D. Farr, USDA National Agriculture Laboratories, National Fungus Collections BPI, Beltsville, MA) Dr. -
Myxomyceten Aus Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland V (Mit Berücksichtigung Von Vorkommen in Oberösterreich) 25-46 ©Staatl
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Carolinea - Beiträge zur naturkundlichen Forschung in Südwestdeutschland Jahr/Year: 1989 Band/Volume: 47 Autor(en)/Author(s): Neubert Hermann, Nowotny Wolfgang, Baumann Karlheinz Artikel/Article: Myxomyceten aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland V (Mit Berücksichtigung von Vorkommen in Oberösterreich) 25-46 ©Staatl. Mus. f. Naturkde Karlsruhe & Naturwiss. Ver. Karlsruhe e.V.; download unter www.zobodat.at carolinea, 47: 25-46, 6 Abb., 8 Farbtaf.; Karlsruhe, 30. 10. 1989 25 H e r m a n n N e u b e r t , W o l f g a n g N o w o t n y & K a r l h e in z B a u m a n n Myxomyceten aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland V (Mit Berücksichtigung von Vorkommen in Oberösterreich) Kurzfassung 1. Einleitung Die einzige Ordnung Stemonitales der Unterklasse Stemonito- mycetidae wird bis zu den Gattungen, die Gattungen Collaria Um dem Fehlen neuerer deutschsprachiger Bestim und Lamproderma werden bis zu den Arten aufgeschlüsselt. mungsliteratur über Myxomyceten weiter abzuhelfen Die aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, dem deutschen und französischen Alpenraum und Oberösterreich nachgewiesenen und als Teilergebnis einer umfangreicheren Arbeit über Arten der Gattungen Collaria und Lamproderma werden be die bei uns vorkommenden Sippen, wird nachstehend schrieben und diskutiert. 3 neue Arten und eine neue Varietät die Unterklasse Stemonitomycetidae bis zu den Gattun aus der Gattung Lamproderma werden vorgestellt: L. album, L gen aufgeschlüsselt. Hieraus werden die Arten der Gat longifilum, L. mucronatum und L. arcyrioides var. leucofilum. tungen Collaria und Lamproderma, soweit sie nachge Arcyria helvética erhält Artrang. -
The Classification of Lower Organisms
The Classification of Lower Organisms Ernst Hkinrich Haickei, in 1874 From Rolschc (1906). By permission of Macrae Smith Company. C f3 The Classification of LOWER ORGANISMS By HERBERT FAULKNER COPELAND \ PACIFIC ^.,^,kfi^..^ BOOKS PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Copyright 1956 by Herbert F. Copeland Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 56-7944 Published by PACIFIC BOOKS Palo Alto, California Printed and bound in the United States of America CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introduction 1 II. An Essay on Nomenclature 6 III. Kingdom Mychota 12 Phylum Archezoa 17 Class 1. Schizophyta 18 Order 1. Schizosporea 18 Order 2. Actinomycetalea 24 Order 3. Caulobacterialea 25 Class 2. Myxoschizomycetes 27 Order 1. Myxobactralea 27 Order 2. Spirochaetalea 28 Class 3. Archiplastidea 29 Order 1. Rhodobacteria 31 Order 2. Sphaerotilalea 33 Order 3. Coccogonea 33 Order 4. Gloiophycea 33 IV. Kingdom Protoctista 37 V. Phylum Rhodophyta 40 Class 1. Bangialea 41 Order Bangiacea 41 Class 2. Heterocarpea 44 Order 1. Cryptospermea 47 Order 2. Sphaerococcoidea 47 Order 3. Gelidialea 49 Order 4. Furccllariea 50 Order 5. Coeloblastea 51 Order 6. Floridea 51 VI. Phylum Phaeophyta 53 Class 1. Heterokonta 55 Order 1. Ochromonadalea 57 Order 2. Silicoflagellata 61 Order 3. Vaucheriacea 63 Order 4. Choanoflagellata 67 Order 5. Hyphochytrialea 69 Class 2. Bacillariacea 69 Order 1. Disciformia 73 Order 2. Diatomea 74 Class 3. Oomycetes 76 Order 1. Saprolegnina 77 Order 2. Peronosporina 80 Order 3. Lagenidialea 81 Class 4. Melanophycea 82 Order 1 . Phaeozoosporea 86 Order 2. Sphacelarialea 86 Order 3. Dictyotea 86 Order 4. Sporochnoidea 87 V ly Chapter Page Orders. Cutlerialea 88 Order 6. -
Collecting and Recording Fungi
British Mycological Society Recording Network Guidance Notes COLLECTING AND RECORDING FUNGI A revision of the Guide to Recording Fungi previously issued (1994) in the BMS Guides for the Amateur Mycologist series. Edited by Richard Iliffe June 2004 (updated August 2006) © British Mycological Society 2006 Table of contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 Recording 4 Collecting fungi 4 Access to foray sites and the country code 5 Spore prints 6 Field books 7 Index cards 7 Computers 8 Foray Record Sheets 9 Literature for the identification of fungi 9 Help with identification 9 Drying specimens for a herbarium 10 Taxonomy and nomenclature 12 Recent changes in plant taxonomy 12 Recent changes in fungal taxonomy 13 Orders of fungi 14 Nomenclature 15 Synonymy 16 Morph 16 The spore stages of rust fungi 17 A brief history of fungus recording 19 The BMS Fungal Records Database (BMSFRD) 20 Field definitions 20 Entering records in BMSFRD format 22 Locality 22 Associated organism, substrate and ecosystem 22 Ecosystem descriptors 23 Recommended terms for the substrate field 23 Fungi on dung 24 Examples of database field entries 24 Doubtful identifications 25 MycoRec 25 Recording using other programs 25 Manuscript or typescript records 26 Sending records electronically 26 Saving and back-up 27 Viruses 28 Making data available - Intellectual property rights 28 APPENDICES 1 Other relevant publications 30 2 BMS foray record sheet 31 3 NCC ecosystem codes 32 4 Table of orders of fungi 34 5 Herbaria in UK and Europe 35 6 Help with identification 36 7 Useful contacts 39 8 List of Fungus Recording Groups 40 9 BMS Keys – list of contents 42 10 The BMS website 43 11 Copyright licence form 45 12 Guidelines for field mycologists: the practical interpretation of Section 21 of the Drugs Act 2005 46 1 Foreword In June 2000 the British Mycological Society Recording Network (BMSRN), as it is now known, held its Annual Group Leaders’ Meeting at Littledean, Gloucestershire. -
The Myxomycetes of Athens Conty, Ohio
The Myxomycetes of Athens County, Ohio1 DAKKIN L. RUIJINO2 AND JAMKS C. CAVI;NI)KR, Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701 ABSTRACT. The goal of this study was to document all reported collections of myxomycetes (slime molds) from Athens County, OH (USA). The compilation of several published and unpublished studies of myxomycete records from Athens County resulted in a total of 52 species. The species were distributed among 6 orders, 9 families, and 25 genera and represent 24% of the myxomycetes known from Ohio and approximately 15% of those recorded for North America. No new collections for the state of Ohio were reported. OHIO J SCI 102 (2):27-29, 2002 INTRODUCTION both authors. Nomenclature follows that of Keller and Although widely distributed, myxomycetes (true slime Braun (1999) [which closely follows the treatment of molds, acellular slime molds, or plasmodial slime molds) Martin and others (1983) and the synonymy of Martin have not been fully studied throughout Ohio. Despite and Alexopoulos (1969)]- major taxonomic works by Fulmer (1921) and Keller Collections made by Udall (1951) were from a beech- and Braun (1999), the distribution and ecology of the maple forest in Lee Township, and collections made by myxomycetes in several Ohio counties are not well Jones (1943) were from Athens Township (mesic forests known. For example, of the 88 counties in the state, only and Ohio University Campus). Jones' and Udall's theses 64 have recorded myxomycete collections, and many of are available from the Department of Environmental these counties have fewer than five recorded species and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH.