EU Ecolabel Criteria for Printed Paper, Stationery Paper, and Paper Carrier Bag Products

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EU Ecolabel Criteria for Printed Paper, Stationery Paper, and Paper Carrier Bag Products EU Ecolabel Criteria for printed paper, stationery paper, and paper carrier bag products Final Technical Report Malgorzata Kowalska, Shane Donatello and Oliver Wolf 2021 EUR 30549 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Union concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC123180 EUR 30549 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-76-21606-3 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/37534 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021 © European Union, 2021 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Except otherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This means that reuse is allowed provided appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. All content © European Union, 2021, except: cover page, Alterfalter, image #43051807, 2020. Source: stock.adobe.com (unless otherwise specified) How to cite this report: Kowalska M., Donatello S., Wolf O. EU Ecolabel Criteria for printed paper, stationery paper, and paper carrier bag products, EUR 30549 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021, ISBN 978-92-76-21606-3 doi:10.2760/37534, JRC123180. Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Methodology and sources of information ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Summary of the preliminary reports and link to the EU Ecolabel criteria .................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Product group name, scope and definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Summary of the key market aspects .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2.3 Key environmental aspects and relation to the criteria proposal ................................................................................................. 11 2 Assessment and verification ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3 Criteria proposal ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Criterion 1 – Substrate ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.2 Criterion 2 – Restricted substances .................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Horizontal restrictions: 1) SVHCs and 2) CLP ............................................................................................................................................. 19 3.2.2 Specific restrictions – Biocidal products and biocidal active substances................................................................................. 23 3.2.3 Specific restrictions – Cleaning agents .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.4 Specific restrictions – Alkyl phenol ethoxylates, halogenated solvents and phthalates ................................................ 26 3.2.5 Specific restrictions – Further restrictions applying to printing inks, toners and varnishes ......................................... 29 3.2.6 Specific restrictions – Toluene recovery from rotogravure printing ............................................................................................ 31 3.3 Criterion 3 – Recyclability ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.1 Removability of non-paper parts ....................................................................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.2 Repulpability .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.3 Removability of adhesives ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.4 Deinkability ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 3.4 Criterion 4 – Emissions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.1 Emission to water from rotogravure printing ............................................................................................................................................ 43 3.4.2 Emission from installations covered by Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council or equivalent installations.................................................................................................................................................................................. 44 3.4.3 VOCs emission from printing processes not covered by Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 3.5 Criterion 5 – Waste ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 3.5.1 Waste Management System ................................................................................................................................................................................. 51 3.5.2 Paper for recycling from printing facilities .................................................................................................................................................. 52 3.5.3 Paper for recycling from stationery paper products and carrier bags production sites ................................................. 54 3.6 Criterion 6 – Energy use ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 56 3.7 Criterion 7 – Training ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report Norske Skog
    09 ANNUAL REPORT NORSKE SKOG BOD report Sustainability 22 and accounts 96 report KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES DEFINITIONS 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Income statement (NOK million) Operating revenue 20 362 26 468 27 118 28 812 25 726 25 302 24 068 23 471 30 354 26 635 Gross operating earnings 1 2 185 2 723 3 932 4 704 3 957 4 353 4 686 5 198 8 419 6 599 Operating earnings (1 325) (1 407) 677 (2 527) 630 757 1 536 1 306 5 096 4 211 Earnings before financial expenses 2 (1 209) (1 242) 785 (2 275) (51) 868 1 383 1 833 5 581 4 575 Profit/loss before income taxes (1 019) (2 779) 235 (3 480) (1 004) 210 770 806 3 894 3 021 Net profit/loss for the year (1 400) (2 765) (683) (3 017) (848) 629 406 1 168 2 660 2 184 Balance sheet (NOK million) Non-current assets 23 546 26 980 29 307 37 577 43 740 36 861 39 219 38 197 45 417 43 717 Current assets 9 609 18 211 13 953 7 653 8 293 7 238 7 119 6 769 10 855 17 510 Total assets 33 155 45 191 43 260 45 230 52 033 44 099 46 338 44 966 56 272 61 227 Total equity 12 015 13 632 15 957 18 550 22 679 18 894 19 416 17 921 19 526 22 351 Non-current liabilities 17 316 23 277 21 533 18 802 21 700 20 052 21 402 18 814 30 858 31 906 Current liabilities 3 824 8 282 5 770 7 878 7 654 5 153 5 520 6 210 5 888 6 970 Total equity and liabilities 33 155 45 191 43 260 45 230 52 033 44 099 46 338 42 945 56 272 61 227 Net interest-bearing debt 9 595 14 047 16 408 17 320 19 063 16 871 17 759 18 204 22 820 20 535 Profitability Gross operating margin % 3 10.73 10.30 14.50 16.30 15.40 17.20 19.50 22.10 27.70 24.80
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Optical Properties
    Summary Mechanical pulping is a process for production of wood pulp in papermaking. Thermomechanical Pulp (TMP) and Groundwood (GW) are historically the two production methods used for mechanical pulping. Because of high electrical prices and increasing requirements in pulp quality it is of interest to improve the mechanical pulping process. The Advanced Thermomechanical Pulp (ATMP) process is a development of the TMP process developed to reduce the electrical energy consumption in production of mechanical pulp. ATMP also has better strength properties and optical properties compared to TMP. Andritz, Paper and Fibre Research Institute (PFI) and Norske Skog together have developed this production method throughout several pilot plant trials with excellent results. Mechanical pre-treatment of wood chips with a screw press and chemical addition in a high intensity primary refining stage are the features of the ATMP process. This process has recently been described (Hill et al. 2009, Hill et al. 2010, Gorski et al. 2011 and Johansson et al. 2011). Improvements in the electrical energy efficiency in refining of up to 0,65 MWh/odt or 34 % as well as higher brightness and lower shive contents compared to reference TMP pulp were shown for spruce raw material (Gorski et al. 2011) To further understand what happens with the pulp in ATMP process compared to the TMP process different investigations were carried out. Methylene blue sorption were evaluated and used to measure the total amount of anionic groups on both ATMP and TMP produced pulps. ATMP produced pulps achieved a higher number of acidic groups compared to pulps without addition of chemicals for not only the whole pulp but also for three different fractions of each pulp.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Matte Coating on the Paper Surface and Print Density
    DOI 10.1515/secm-2012-0070 Sci Eng Compos Mater 2013; 20(2): 141–145 Cem Aydemir * , Zafer Ö zomay , Arif Karademir and Emine Arman Kand ı rmaz Effects of matte coating on the paper surface and print density Abstract: In this work, standard laboratory printing appli- papers. Fiber properties such as coarseness, beating, filler cations with IGT (ISO 12647-2) were applied on uncoated loading, pressing, calendering and coating are some of and matte-coated papers using offset inks (DIN ISO 2846-1). the main factors that mostly affect the surface roughness Surface roughnesses of uncoated and coated sheets were and porosity of paper products. The diameters of pores recorded to be 195 and 13 ml/min, respectively. Air perma- and uniform distribution in the paper structure are also nence values of uncoated and coated papers were found important for ink absorption [1, 2] . to be 5.6 and 0.103 μ m/Pa · s, respectively. Changes in A liquid droplet touching a paper surface tends to both the print densities were recorded up to 48 h. Print den- penetrate into the paper structure and spread over the sity changes for uncoated and matte-coated papers were surface. The extent of penetration or spreading depends surprisingly found to be in similar paths (8 % in the first on both the properties of the paper and liquids (ink) and 4 h), although significant differences between surface environmental conditions like temperature, humidity and roughnesses were recorded. Furthermore, paper samples pressure. Inks can be classified into three main groups showed similar behaviors for the percent volume changes, according to the carrier medium as solvent-based, oil-based where drop volume disappeared within 6 min.
    [Show full text]
  • 7/1 Environmental Exposure Assessment ENV/JM/EEA(2004)
    For Official Use ENV/JM/EEA(2004)7/1 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 17-Aug-2004 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND For Official Use ENV/JM/EEA(2004)7/1 THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Environmental Exposure Assessment DRAFT EMISSION SCENARIO ON PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY KRAFT PULP MILLS Meeting of the Task Force on Envionmental Exposure Assessment, to be held in Vienna, Austria on 13-15 September 2004 Mr. Eisaku Toda Tel: +33 1 45 24 79 07, Fax: +33 1 45 24 16 73, E-mail: [email protected] English - Or. English JT00168124 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ENV/JM/EEA(2004)7/1 This document includes a draft emission scenario document (ESD) on pulp and paper industry kraft pulp mills, submitted by Canada. Action required: The Task Force is invited to review this document, and consider the next steps for the finalisation of the document. 2 ENV/JM/EEA(2004)7/1 Emission Scenario Document for Kraft Pulp Mills Prepared for Environment Canada Environmental Protection Service New Substances Branch Place Vincent Massey, 351 St. Joseph Blvd., 14th Floor GATINEAU, QUEBEC, CANADA K1A 0H3 Contact: Mr. Jonathan Tigner Tel: (819) 997-5804 Fax: (819) 953-7155 E-MAIL: [email protected] Prepared by Crechem Technologies Inc. 1438 Bradshaw Crescent Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1B 5G2 www.crechem.com Contact: Jesse Shen Tel: (613) 744-6001 Fax: (613) 744-0573 E-mail: [email protected] In association with JANCO 4 De Caria Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Vendor Application Commodity List Expanded.Xlsx
    City of Dayton Commodity Code List Select the Entire Sheet to UNHIDE the Detail Rows Section COMMODITY_ID COMMODITY_NAME 005 00500 ABRASIVES 00514 Abrasives, Coated: Cloth, Fiber, Sandpaper, etc. 00521 Abrasives, Sandblasting, Metal 00528 Abrasives, Sandblasting (Other than Metal) 00542 Abrasives, Solid: Wheels, Stones, etc. 00556 Abrasives, Tumbling (Wheel) 00563 Grinding and Polishing Compounds: Carborundum, Dia 00570 Pumice Stone 00584 Steel Wool 00599 Misc. Abrasives 010 01000 ACOUSTICAL TILE, INSULATING MATERIALS, AND SUPPLIE 01005 Acoustical Tile, All Types 01008 Acoustical Tile Accessories: Channels, Grids, Moun 01009 Acoustical Tile Insulation 01011 Adhesives and Cements, Acoustical Tile 01014 Adhesives and Cements, Insulation 01017 Aluminum Foil etc. 01030 Bands, Clips, and Wires (For Pipe Insulation) 01038 Clips, Pins, etc. (For Duct Insulation) 01041 Cork: Blocks, Boards, Sheets, etc. 01045 Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems 01053 Fiberglass: Batts, Blankets and Rolls 01056 Foam Glass: Blocks, Sheets, etc. 01057 Foam‐in‐Place Insulation: Phenolic, Urethane, etc. 01059 Foam Plastics: Blocks, Boards, Sheets, etc. 01063 Insulation, Blown Type 01065 Jacketing (For Insulation): Canvas, Osnaburg, etc. 01070 Magnesia: Blocks, Sheets, etc. 01072 Mineral Wool: Blankets, Blocks, Boards 01075 Paints, Primers, Sealers, etc. (For Insulation) 01076 Paper Type Insulation Material (Cellulose, etc.) 01078 Pipe and Tubing Insulation, All Types 01081 Preformed Insulation, All Types (For Ells, Tees, V 01084 Rubber Insulation 01099 Misc. Acc.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper and Surface Chemistry – Part 1- Fiber Surface and Wet End Chemistry
    Paper and Surface Chemistry – Part 1- Fiber Surface and Wet End Chemistry Pedro Fardim Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brazil Present Address: Process Chemistry Group, Åbo Akademi University, Turku/Åbo, Finland Abstract Paper manufacturing and converting involves a multitude of surface chemical interactions. Beating, stock preparation, coating and converting processes are steps where surface phenomena play an important role for product consolidation and performance. Interactions between fibers and colloidal particles, polymers, minerals and, dyes are fundamental in papermaking and most of them are complex and not very well understood. Thus, many paper formulations are designed according to an empirical trial-and-error approach. This work is a critical literature review of some of the interactions present in papermaking, coating, and printing. In the first part, the current models for fiber surfaces and their interactions in the wet end are discussed. Limitations concerning the fiber surface definition and the available models based on direct observation, DLVO theory, and a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches are highlighted. Complexity factors such as surface composition heterogeneity, contamination from manufacturing processes, and surface mobility are suggested to be considered. Surface interactions present in the wet end, with focus on reversible and irreversible flocculation as well as on the flocculation mechanisms concerning fibers, polymers and micro-particles are also discussed. The role of the fiber surface chemical composition on flocculation and flock size and the influence from the chemical medium in the paper machine is reviewed. Papermaking is suggested as being a fiber surface modification process once polymers and other chemicals are used to change the surface energy and chemical composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Studies of Chloropropanols from Paperboard Packaging
    MIGRATION STUDIES OF CHLOROPROPANOLS FROM PAPERBOARD PACKAGING IN CONTACT WITH FOODSTUFFS by GREGORY V. PACE A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School - New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Food Science written under the direction of Professor Thomas G. Hartman and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey January 2011 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Migration Studies of Chloropropanols from Paperboard Packaging in Contact with Foodstuffs By GREGORY V. PACE Dissertation Director: Professor Thomas G. Hartman The food processing of acid hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP) results in the chlorination of residual lipids to form chloropropanols. 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol (3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol; 3-MCPD), and 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol (1,3-DCP), are the most common chloropropanols found in HVP foods and also soy sauces. The manufacturing process of paperboard food packaging may also produce chloropropanols. 3-MCPD and 1,3-DCP can be found in paperboard when wet-strength resins made with epichlorohydrin are used. 1,3-DCP had been determined to be carcinogenic in rats and mice. 3-MCPD was a suspected carcinogen , and has recently been moving towards classification as a carcinogen. The European (EU) Commission and the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) have set maximum levels in food and food paperboard packaging for 3-MCPD ii and 1,3-DCP. In October 2010, 3-MCPD and 1,3-DCP were added to the California Proposition 65 list of compounds known to State to cause cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • PARTIAL LIST CF RFFLRENCF WCRES on PULP AN® IDAIDLR Il
    CULTURE ROO M PARTIAL LIST CF RFFLRENCF WCRES ON PULP AN® IDAIDLR Revised May 1959 No. 564 L ! .1111.1 11:1:11.111111111 ~— .1111111111 1' Il iri IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUR E FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATOR Y FOREST SERVIC E MADISON 5, WISCONSIN In Cooperation with the University of Wisconsin A PARTIAL LIST OF REFERENCE WORKS ON PULP AND PAPE R General information regarding pulp and paper making can often be ob- tained by consulting general encyclopedias and technical handbooks . These may be found in technical and general libraries, where it ma y also be possible to secure some of the following references specificall y relating to this subject. However, if any of them are especially de - sired and cannot be obtained otherwise, they may be bought from the publishers or through the larger book dealers . American paper and pulp association. The dictionary of paper ; including pulps, boards, paper properties, and related papermaking terms . 2d ed. The Association, 1951 . 393 p . $6 .50 . American pulp and paper mill superintendents association. Yearbook and program . 337 S . LaSalle St. , Chicago 4, Ill . The Association. Issued annually to members . American Society for Testing Materials . ASTM standards on paper and pape r products ; prepared by Corn . D-6 on paper and paper products in Part 6 . Philadelphia, The Society . 1958. 500 p . on paper and paper product s $10 .00 . Bettendorf, H . J. Paperboard and paperboard containers : a history. Rev. version . Chicago, Board Products Publishing Co . , 1946 . 135 p. $6 . British paper and board makers association . Tech. section. Proceeding s 1921 . St.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 48 Paper and Paperboard; Articles of Paper Pulp, of Paper Or Of
    Section X Chapter 48 Chapter 48 Paper and paperboard; articles of paper pulp, of paper or of paperboard Notes. 1.- For the purposes of this Chapter, except where the context otherwise requires, a reference to “paper” includes references to paperboard (irrespective of thickness or weight per m2). 2.- This Chapter does not cover: (a) Articles of Chapter 30; (b) Stamping foils of heading 32.12; I Perfumed papers or papers impregnated or coated with cosmetics (Chapter 33); (d) Paper or cellulose wadding impregnated, coated or covered with soap or detergent (heading 34.01), or with polishes, creams or similar preparations (heading 34.05); (e) Sensitised paper or paperboard of headings 37.01 to 37.04; (f) Paper impregnated with diagnostic or laboratory reagents (heading 38.22); (g) Paper-reinforced stratified sheeting of plastics, or one layer of paper or paperboard coated or covered with a layer of plastics, the latter constituting more than half the total thickness, or articles of such materials, other than wall coverings of heading 48.14 (Chapter 39); (h) Articles of heading 42.02 (for example, travel goods); (ij) Articles of Chapter 46 (manufactures of plaiting material); (k) Paper yarn or textile articles of paper yarn (Section XI); (l) Articles of Chapter 64 or Chapter 65; (m) Abrasive paper or paperboard (heading 68.05) or paper- or paperboard-backed mica (heading 68.14) (paper and paperboard coated with mica powder are, however, to be classified in this Chapter); (n) Metal foil backed with paper or paperboard (generally Section XIV or XV); (o) Articles of heading 92.09; or (p) Articles of Chapter 95 (for example, toys, games, sports requisites) or Chapter 96 (for example, buttons).
    [Show full text]
  • Pulp & Paper Chemicals
    Freedonia Industry Study #1531 Study Publication Date: March 2002 Price: $3,800 Pulp & Paper Chemicals Pages: 268 Pulp & Paper Chemicals, a new study from The Freedonia Group, provides you with an in-depth analysis of major trends in the industry and the outlook for product seg- ments and major markets -- critical information to help you with strategic planning. This brochure gives you an indication of the scope, depth and value of Freedonia's new study, Pulp & Paper Chemi- cals. Ordering information is included on the back page of the brochure. Brochure Table of Contents Study Highlights ............................................................................... 2 Table of Contents and List of Tables and Charts ............................. 4 Sample Pages and Sample Tables from: Market Environment .................................................... 6 Products....................................................................... 7 Demand by End User .................................................. 8 Industry Structure ........................................................ 9 Company Profiles ...................................................... 10 List of Companies Profiled ........................................ 11 Forecasting Methodology ............................................................... 12 About the Company ....................................................................... 13 Advantages of Freedonia Reports ................................................... 13 About Our Customers ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fundamentals of Papermaking Materials
    Preferred citation: A. Swerin and L. Ödberg. Some aspects of retention aids. In The Fundametals of Papermaking Materials, Trans. of the XIth Fund. Res. Symp. Cambridge, 1997, (C.F. Baker, ed.), pp 265–350, FRC, Manchester, 2018. DOI: 10.15376/frc.1997.1.265. SOME ASPECTS OF RETENTION AIDS Agne Swerin and Lars Ödberg STFI, Swedish Pulp and Paper Research Institute Box 5604, S-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT Fundamental aspects on polymer adsorption and flocculation phenomena are reviewed . Special emphasis is placed on recent developments . Examples are the mode of action of microparticle retention aid systems and of retention systems based on polyethylene oxide/phenolic resin. Fibre flocculation and the strength of fibrous networks are affected by retention aids and this is discussed in, connection with investigations on retention and formation in the laboratory and on pilot-scale paper machines . 266 INTRODUCTION This review article deals primarily with retention aids. Other papers presented at this symposium are devoted to other paper chemicals such as sizing agents and strength aids. Some of the discussion in this paper, e.g, on the adsorption of polyelectrolytes, is of course of relevance for some of these other areas as well. There are already extensive reviews available concerning retention aids and retention mechanisms (1, 2) and this review is therefore concentrated on more recent developments especially those not covered in the earlier reviews. We do not, however, claim to have covered all developments . There is, of course, some emphasis on the work done at STFI, primarily since this work is very familiar to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellulose-Based Electrical Insulation Materials Dielectric and Mechanical Properties REBECCA HOLLERTZ
    Cellulose-based electrical insulation materials Dielectric and mechanical properties REBECCA HOLLERTZ Doctoral thesis KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Chemical Science and Engineering Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology ISBN 978-91-7729-327-9 TRITA – CHE-report 2017:21 ISSN 1654-1081 Tryck: US-AB, Stockholm, 2017 The following papers are reprinted with permission from: Paper I: Springer Papers II, III, VII and VIII: IEEE Transactions on Dielectric and Electrical Insulation AKADEMISK AVHANDLING Som med tillstånd av Kungliga Tekniska högskolan i Stockholm framläggs till offentlig granskning för avläggande av teknologie doktorsexamen fredagen den 12 maj 2017, kl. 10.00 i F3, Lindstedtsvägen 26, KTH, Stockholm. Avhandlingen försvaras på engelska. Fakultetsopponent: Professor Markus Biesalski, TU Darmstadt, Tyskland Copyright© Rebecca Hollertz, 2017 ABSTRACT The reliability of the generation and distribution of electricity is highly dependent on electrical insulation and is essential for the prosperity of our society and a ubiquitous part of our everyday life. The present study shows how some important material properties affect the electrical properties of cellulose-based electrical insulation systems which are used together with mineral oil in high-voltage transformers. Among other things, the effects of paper density and of the lignin content of the fibres on the dielectric response and charge transport of the papers have been studied. The underlying mechanisms of the inception and propagation of streamers, responsible for the most costly failures in transformers, at the oil-solid interface have been investigated and the important role of paper morphology on streamer propagation has been demonstrated. With papers, in contrast to films of synthetic polymers and microfibrillated cellulose, the branching of streamers increased and the length of slow negative streamers decreased.
    [Show full text]