A Short History of Physics in the American Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Short History of Physics in the American Century A Short History of Physics in the American Century NEW HISTORIES OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND MEDICINE Series Editors Margaret C. Jacob Spencer R. Weart A Short History of Physics in the American Century David C. Cassidy Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England 2011 Copyright © 2011 by David C. Cassidy All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data Cassidy, David C., 1945– A short history of physics in the American century / David C. Cassidy. p. cm.—(New histories of science, technology, and medicine) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0- 674- 04936- 9 (alk. paper) 1. Physics— United States— History. 2. Physicists— United States. I. Title. QC9.U5C36 2011 530.0973'0904—dc22 2011004099 Contents Introduction 1 1 Entering the New Century 6 2 American Physics Comes of Age 25 3 Surviving the Depression 52 4 The Physicists’ War 72 5 Taming the Endless Frontier 90 6 The New Physics 106 7 Sputnik: Action and Reaction 124 8 Revising the Partnership 144 Appendix: Tables 171 Notes 177 Acknowledgments 201 Index 203 A Short History of Physics in the American Century Introduction Physicists were in a celebratory mood at the turn to the twenty- fi rst cen- tury. Nearly every year of the de cade straddling 2000 brought celebra- tions of discoveries and breakthroughs that had revolutionized physics and transformed the world in which we live. The hundredth anniversaries of the discoveries of X-rays (1895), radioactivity (1896), the electron (1897), the idea of the quantum (1900), and Albert Einstein’s “year of miracles” (1905) fell during the years from 1995 to 2005. Those years also encompassed the seventy- fi fth anniversary of the breakthrough to quantum mechanics (1925), the sixtieth anniversary of the start of the Manhattan Project (1942), the fi ftieth anniversary of the transistor (1947), the fortieth anniversary of the laser (1960), and the tenth anniversary of high- temperature superconductivity (1986). The hundredth anniversaries of the founding of the premier research journal Physical Re- view (1893) and the American physicists’ main professional orga ni za tion, the American Physical Society (1899), also fell within the last years of the century, marking milestones in the story of American physics during the past century. Many of these more recent developments and discoveries had occurred within the United States and within a discipline of research that itself had undergone a remarkable transformation. During the twentieth century, American physics followed an arching trajectory that extended from rela- tively humble beginnings in 1900 to a place on the world stage by the early 1930s, to a place of preeminence by the 1950s, and fi nally by the end of the 2 Introduction century to a more modest place as an internationalized discipline within a global community of competitors. This is a book about that trajectory: the people, the discoveries, the institutions. It includes both the well-known and the less well- known physicists and institutions, as well as often ne- glected minority participants. Here “American physics” refers to physics in the United States of America, the profession and the science. The trajectory of American physics did not proceed in isolation but closely tracked and sometimes led the international growth, expansion, and shifts occurring within physics itself before and during the century. It also closely followed the trajectory of American history. By 1900 the United States was poised for rapid growth and infl uence. The nation had recently achieved industrialization, and its economy was primed for expansion. At the same time, as new discoveries emerged in Europe, new technologies reached commercialization in the United States, helping spur the demand for home- grown discoveries. The nation’s infl uence grew as it became a key player on the world stage during the fi rst and second world wars, and as it became the main competitor with the Soviet Union during the de cades of the Cold War, which ended in the early 1990s. As the United States emerged from the world wars as one of the most powerful economic, military, and scientifi c nations on the planet, some of its leaders believed that its time had come to proclaim “the American Century,” a century that they believed would be dominated, in rather imperial terms, by the spread of American democracy, culture, industry, and infl uence across the globe, all supported by the world’s fi nest innovators in science and technology.1 Among those innovators were, of course, the physicists who had helped win the war with radar and the atomic bomb. As the Cold War concluded during the last de cade of the century, the United States found itself the last remaining superpower. But, after relinquishing its postwar commitment to scientifi c leadership early in the last third of the century, the nation also found itself struggling to maintain the competitive quality of its education and to foster its increasingly internationalized research base within a global environment populated by other industrial and industrializing nations intent upon rais- ing their scientifi c expertise to equal or greater status. How did all this happen? What forces were at work in the United States and within physics and the physics profession that brought about these changes in the status of its science? Introduction 3 What we call science is the body of knowledge about nature that has been assembled, tested, and constantly retested and revised by many generations of people in many different nations and cultures. It is, in the end, a prod- uct of our universal curiosity and drive to comprehend the natural world in which we live. But it is also a product of its time and of the people and in- stitutions and cultures that produce it. By its name, physics focuses on the physical aspects of nature, the search for an understanding of the laws of nature that govern the properties and behavior of physical matter. As the properties, behaviors, and types of matter under investigation expanded and shifted over time and for a variety of reasons, the physics discipline itself expanded dramatically over the course of the century. This led to the growth of new, specialized subdisciplines, such as condensed- matter, plasma, medical, chemical, and computational physics, and to new “hyphen- ated” fi elds such as astrophysics, geophysics, and biophysics. Because of the human quality of science and of the need for constant cooperation, testing, and revising, a nation’s success in science arises from its ability to create a community of trained scientists and to support and encourage that community by creating the conditions that will foster re- search on the forefront of knowledge. Among these conditions are a steady supply of motivated young people prepared for the rigors of training and future research; ready access to higher education; suffi cient funding, equip- ment, and professional standards; freedom to publish and debate results; and, for a newly emerging community, a widely accepted vision of its work and goals that enables it to create and maintain an in de pen dent profes- sional identity within science and the broader society. By itself, science produces only knowledge about nature. It does not di- rectly produce any new goods or commercial products. But modern scien- tifi c research is expensive, highly technical, and often frustrating in that useful results are never guaranteed. As have scientists throughout history, American physicists found it necessary to rely for research support, social recognition, and training and employment on partnerships with other, more powerful institutions within society. Among them were government, industry, military, philanthropy, education, and the general public. And these institutions responded as they recognized—and were encouraged to recognize— at least two advantages that a healthy science, and physics, can bring. The fi rst was best captured in Francis Bacon’s famous statement 4 Introduction that “knowledge is power”: the power to produce new technologies lead- ing to new consumer products, new instruments of research, new medical applications, new military weapons, and new solutions to national prob- lems such as energy resources. A second advantage of a thriving physics is that it can be regarded as one component of a nation’s culture and learn- ing and thus as a valued indicator of a nation’s cultural standing. This was especially important during the Cold War, a competition that both sides regarded as a clash, not just between two superpowers, but between two po liti cal, social, and economic systems whose strength and superiority were exemplifi ed by the strength and superiority of their science and culture. The history of American physics during the twentieth century is, of course, a very big subject and one that can be approached from many dif- ferent perspectives. In addition, a great deal has already been written about the history of American physics during the past century— from histories of industrial facilities, philanthropic foundations, and accelerator laborato- ries to detailed studies of important discoveries, developments, and people; to accounts of defi ning events such as the Manhattan Project and radar development; to so cio log i cal, anthropological, and philosophical analyses of physicists and their work; to end-of- century surveys of advances in physics during the past century; to scholarly histories of the overall growth of the American physics discipline and science. Many of these studies, some published de cades ago, are still considered authoritative within the spaces they occupy. They include, in par tic u lar, works by Daniel Kevles, A. Hunter Dupree, Richard Rhodes, and many of the other authors listed in the notes to this book. Although it was fi rst published in 1971, Kevles’s The Physicists: The History of a Scientifi c Community in Modern America remains the standard historical account of the American academic physics profession from the late nineteenth century through the fi rst two- thirds of the twentieth cen- tury.
Recommended publications
  • From Theory to the First Working Laser Laser History—Part I
    I feature_ laser history From theory to the first working laser Laser history—Part I Author_Ingmar Ingenegeren, Germany _The principle of both maser (microwave am- 19 US patents) using a ruby laser. Both were nom- plification by stimulated emission of radiation) inated for the Nobel Prize. Gábor received the 1971 and laser (light amplification by stimulated emis- Nobel Prize in Physics for the invention and devel- sion of radiation) were first described in 1917 by opment of the holographic method. To a friend he Albert Einstein (Fig.1) in “Zur Quantentheorie der wrote that he was ashamed to get this prize for Strahlung”, as the so called ‘stimulated emission’, such a simple invention. He was the owner of more based on Niels Bohr’s quantum theory, postulated than a hundred patents. in 1913, which explains the actions of electrons in- side atoms. Einstein (born in Germany, 14 March In 1954 at the Columbia University in New York, 1879–18 April 1955) received the Nobel Prize for Charles Townes (born in the USA, 28 July 1915–to- physics in 1921, and Bohr (born in Denmark, 7 Oc- day, Fig. 2) and Arthur Schawlow (born in the USA, tober 1885–18 November 1962) in 1922. 5 Mai 1921–28 April 1999, Fig. 3) invented the maser, using ammonia gas and microwaves which In 1947 Dennis Gábor (born in Hungarian, 5 led to the granting of a patent on March 24, 1959. June 1900–8 February 1972) developed the theory The maser was used to amplify radio signals and as of holography, which requires laser light for its re- an ultra sensitive detector for space research.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICS and SOCIETY
    PHYSICS and SOCIETY THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FORUM ON PHYSICS AND SOCIETY, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 335 EAST 45th ST., NEW YORK, NY 10017 PRINTED BY THE PENNY·SAVER, MANSFIELD, PA 16933 . Volume 12, Number 2 April 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS Forum Executive Committee.......................................................................................................................2 Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting in New york................................................................................3 News of the Forum...................................................................................................................................4 Forum Studies on Nuclear Weapons by Leo Sartori...........................................................................................5 APS Councillor's Report by Mike Cosper.........................................................................................................5 APS Statement on Nuclear Arms limitation....................................................................................................B COPS Report by Earl Collen.........................................................................................................................9 Announcements .......................................................................................................................................9 International Freeze AppeaL .....................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Harvey Fletcher and Henry Eyring: Men of Faith and Science
    Edward L. Kimball Harvey Fletcher and Henry Eyring: Men of Faith and Science The year 1981 saw the deaths of Harvey Fletcher and Henry Eyring, men of great religious faith whose superb professional achievements placed them in the first ranks of the nation's scientists. (See Steven H. Heath's "The Reconcilia- tion of Faith and Science: Henry Eyring's Achievement," this issue.) Both could be said to have had simple religious faith — not because they were un- complicated people incapable of subtlety, but because their religious character was early and firmly grounded in a few fundamentals. This freed them from a life of continuing doubt and struggle. The two men, seventeen years apart in age, had a kind of family relation- ship. Henry Eyring's uncle Carl Eyring (after whom BYU's Eyring Science Center is named) married Fern Chipman; Harvey Fletcher married her sister Lorena. After their spouses died, Harvey Fletcher and Fern Chipman Eyring married. As a result, Henry Eyring called him Uncle Harvey. But that was not unique. Nearly everyone else did, too. Harvey Fletcher was born in 1884 in a little frame house in Provo, Utah. Among his memories are attending the dedication of the Salt Lake Temple and shaking President Wilford Woodruff's hand. As a young boy, he recited a short poem at a program in the Provo Tabernacle; and after he finished, Karl G. Maeser, principal of the Brigham Young Academy, stopped him before he could resume his seat, put his hand on Harvey's head, and said, "I want this congregation to know that this little boy will one day be a great man." Instead of being pleased, Harvey was bothered; he perceived it as a prediction of politi- cal leadership, which he did not want.
    [Show full text]
  • Cavendish the Experimental Life
    Cavendish The Experimental Life Revised Second Edition Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Series Editors Ian T. Baldwin, Gerd Graßhoff, Jürgen Renn, Dagmar Schäfer, Robert Schlögl, Bernard F. Schutz Edition Open Access Development Team Lindy Divarci, Georg Pflanz, Klaus Thoden, Dirk Wintergrün. The Edition Open Access (EOA) platform was founded to bring together publi- cation initiatives seeking to disseminate the results of scholarly work in a format that combines traditional publications with the digital medium. It currently hosts the open-access publications of the “Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge” (MPRL) and “Edition Open Sources” (EOS). EOA is open to host other open access initiatives similar in conception and spirit, in accordance with the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the sciences and humanities, which was launched by the Max Planck Society in 2003. By combining the advantages of traditional publications and the digital medium, the platform offers a new way of publishing research and of studying historical topics or current issues in relation to primary materials that are otherwise not easily available. The volumes are available both as printed books and as online open access publications. They are directed at scholars and students of various disciplines, and at a broader public interested in how science shapes our world. Cavendish The Experimental Life Revised Second Edition Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach Studies 7 Studies 7 Communicated by Jed Z. Buchwald Editorial Team: Lindy Divarci, Georg Pflanz, Bendix Düker, Caroline Frank, Beatrice Hermann, Beatrice Hilke Image Processing: Digitization Group of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Cover Image: Chemical Laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physico-Chemical Nature of the Chemical Bond: Valence Bonding and the Path of Physico-Chemical Emergence
    The physico-chemical nature of the chemical bond: valence bonding and the path of physico-chemical emergence by Martha Lynn Harris A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of the Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Martha Lynn Harris 2008 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-57876-6 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-57876-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of NMR and MRI
    WELLCOME WITNESSES TO TWENTIETH CENTURY MEDICINE _____________________________________________________________________________ MAKING THE HUMAN BODY TRANSPARENT: THE IMPACT OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING _________________________________________________ RESEARCH IN GENERAL PRACTICE __________________________________ DRUGS IN PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE ______________________ THE MRC COMMON COLD UNIT ____________________________________ WITNESS SEMINAR TRANSCRIPTS EDITED BY: E M TANSEY D A CHRISTIE L A REYNOLDS Volume Two – September 1998 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 1998 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 1998 Occasional Publication no. 6, 1998 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 186983 539 1 All volumes are freely available online at www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as : Tansey E M, Christie D A, Reynolds L A. (eds) (1998) Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 2. London: Wellcome Trust. Key Front cover photographs, L to R from the top: Professor Sir Godfrey Hounsfield, speaking (NMR) Professor Robert Steiner, Professor Sir Martin Wood, Professor Sir Rex Richards (NMR) Dr Alan Broadhurst, Dr David Healy (Psy) Dr James Lovelock, Mrs Betty Porterfield (CCU) Professor Alec Jenner (Psy) Professor David Hannay (GPs) Dr Donna Chaproniere (CCU) Professor Merton Sandler (Psy) Professor George Radda (NMR) Mr Keith (Tom) Thompson (CCU) Back cover photographs, L to R, from the top: Professor Hannah Steinberg, Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights APS March Meeting Heads North to Montréal
    December 2003 Volume 12, No. 11 NEWS http://www.physics2005.org A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews APS March Meeting Heads North to Montréal California Physics Departments Face More The 2004 March Meeting will Physics; International Physics; Edu- be organizing a host of special For those who want to Budget Cuts in an be held in lively and cosmopolitan cation and Physics; and Graduate events, including receptions, explore, there will be tours of Uncertain Future Montréal, Canada’s second largest Student Affairs, as well as topical alumni reunions, a students’ Montréal, highlighting the city’s city. The meeting runs from March groups on Instrument and Mea- lunch with the experts, and an history, cultural heritage, cosmo- The California recall election 22nd through the 26th at the surement Science; Magnetism and opportunity to meet the editors politan nature, and European was a laughing matter to many, Palais des Congrès de Montréal. Its Applications; Shock Compres- of the APS and AIP journals. flavor. a veritable circus of replace- Approximately 5,500 papers sion of Condensed Matter; and ment candidates of dubious will be presented in more than 90 Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. celebrity and questionable invited sessions and 550 contrib- An exhibit show will round out APS Honors Two Undergrads qualifications for the job. But for uted sessions in a wide variety of the program during which attend- physics departments across the categories, including condensed ees can visit vendors who will be With Apker Award state, the ongoing budget woes matter, materials, polymer physics, displaying the latest products, that spurred angry voters to chemical physics, biological phys- instruments and equipment, and Peter Onyisi of the University action in the first place remain ics, fluid dynamics, laser science, software, as well as scientific pub- of Chicago received the award deadly serious.
    [Show full text]
  • Btl Innovation List
    Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. List of Significant Innovations & Discoveries (1925-1983) © 2012 A. Michael Noll - All rights reserved. YEAR INNOVATION or DISCOVERY INNOVATORS 1925 Electrical Sound Recording Joseph Maxfield & Harry Harrison 1925 Quality Control Theory W. A. Shewhart 1926 Thermal Noise John B. Johnson 1926 Antenna Arrays R. M. Foster 1926 Permendur Magnetic Alloy G. W. Elmen 1927 Negative Feedback Amplification Harrold Black 1927 Television Transmission Herbert E. Ives 1927 Quartz Electronic Clock Warren Marrison 1927 Transatlantic Telephone Service 1927 Wave Nature of the Electron Clinton J. Davisson & Lester. H. Germer 1927 Wearable Electronic Hearing Aid Harvey Fletcher 1927 Telephone Trunking Traffic Analysis Edward C. Molina 1928 Sampling Theorem Harry Nyquist 1929 Artificial Larynx Robert R. Riesz 1929 Broadband Coaxial Cable Lloyd Espenschied & Herbert A. Apfel 1929 Ship-to-Shore Radio System 1929 Frequency Interleaving of TV Signal Frank Gray & John R. Hefele 1930 Moving-Coil Microphone E. C. Wente & A. L. Thuras 1930 Negative Impedance Repeater George Crisson 1931 Radio Astronomy Karl Jansky 1931 Rhombic Antenna Harald T. Friis & E. Bruce 1931 TWX Exchange Teletypewriter Service 1931 Stereophonic Recording on Film Harvey Fletcher 1931-32 Stereophonic Sound Recording (45°) Harvey Fletcher, Arthur C. Keller 1932 Stability Criteria Diagrams Harry Nyquist 1932 Waveguide Experiments and Theory George C. Southworth, A. P. King, A. E. Bowen 1933 Equal-Loudness Contours Harvey Fletcher & Wilden A. Munson 1933 Vitamin B1 Isolation Process Robert R. Williams 1933 Stereophonic Sound Transmission Harvey Fletcher 1934 Raster Scan TV System Pierre Mertz & Frank Gray 1936 Stereophonc Phonograph Record Arthur C. Keller & Irad S. Rafuse 1936 Vocoder Speech Synthesis Homer Dudley 1936 Reed Switch Walter B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Sole Inventor
    Michigan Law Review Volume 110 Issue 5 2012 The Myth of the Sole Inventor Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark A. Lemley, The Myth of the Sole Inventor, 110 MICH. L. REV. 709 (2012). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol110/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MYTH OF THE SOLE INVENTORt Mark A. Lemley* The theory of patent law is based on the idea that a lone genius can solve problems that stump the experts, and that the lone genius will do so only if properly incented. But the canonical story of the lone genius inventor is largely a myth. Surveys of hundreds of significant new technologies show that almost all of them are invented simultaneously or nearly simultaneous- ly by two or more teams working independently of each other. Invention appears in significant part to be a social, not an individual, phenomenon. The result is a real problem for classic theories of patent law. Our domi- nant theory of patent law doesn't seem to explain the way we actually implement that law. Maybe the problem is not with our current patent law, but with our current patent theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 31072 Total Petition Signers in US
    http://www.climatic-research.com/info.html 31,072 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,021 with PhDs List of Signers By Name All Petition Signers in US 31,072 Total Signers Earl M. Aagaard, PhD, Charles W. Aami, Roger L. Aamodt, PhD, Wilbur A. Aanes, M. Robert Aaron, Ralph F. Abate, Hamed K. Abbas, PhD, Paul Abbett, Wyatt E. Abbitt III, Ursula K. Abbott, PhD, Bernaard J. Abbott, PhD, David M. Abbott Jr., Frank D. Abbott, Paul Abbott, Donald W. Abbott, Douglas R. Abbott, David J. Abbott, Eugene Abbott, Refaat A. Abdel-Malek, PhD, Riaz F. Abdulla, PhD, Albert S. Abdullah, DVM, Alan E. Abel, Jason Abel, Janis I. Abele, Joseph M. Abell, Robert E. Abell, Gene H. Abels, MD, Philip H. Abelson, PhD*, Wayne Aben, Jerrold Abernathy, Marshall W. Abernathy, Grady L. Ables, Earl Arthur Abrahamson, PhD, Robert C. Abrams, Carl M. Abrams, Alan V. Abrams, MD, Paul B. Abramson, PhD, Jose L. Abreu Jr., Joe L. Abriola Jr., Ahmed E. Aburahmah, PhD, Austin R. Ace, David A. Acerni, John W. Achee Sr., Billy R. Achmbaugh, Paul Achmidt, Daniel T. Achord, PhD, Ernest R. Achterberg, Ava V. Ackerman, DVM, William L. Ackerman, John R. Ackerman, Gene L. Ackerman, Richard E. Ackermann, Terry D. Ackman, Donald O. Acrey, Lee Actor, Humberto M. Acuna Jr., Robert K. Adair, PhD, William G. Adair Jr., Daniel Otis Adam, PhD, Brian D. Adam, PhD, Chris Adam, Anthony F. Adamo, George Baker Adams, PhD, Neil Adams, PhD, Leonard Caldwell Adams, PhD, Phillip Adams, PhD, Harold Elwood Adams, PhD, Gail D. Adams, PhD, Roy Melville Adams, PhD, Louis W.
    [Show full text]
  • First Light: from the Ruby Laser to Nonlinear Optics 1960 – 1962
    First light: from the ruby laser to nonlinear optics 1960 – 1962 J. A. Giordmaine Formerly Columbia University, AT&T Bell Laboratories, NEC Laboratories America, Princeton University 1 The first laser May 16, 1960 Theodore Maiman 2 Background The ammonia beam maser concept 1951 Charles Townes 3 The maser 1954 J. P. Gordon, H. J. Zeiger and C. H. Townes Charles Townes and James Gordon 4 Maser proposal 1954 Nikolai Basov Alexandr Prokhorov 5 3-level solid state masers 1956 N. Bloembergen, H. E. D. Scovil, C. Kikuchi Nicolaas Bloembergen 6 Optical maser proposal 1958 Charles Townes Arthur Schawlow 7 Cr +3 levels in pink ruby 8 New solid state lasers 1960 Sorokin, Stevenson; Schawlow; Wieder Peter Sorokin and Mirek Stevenson 9 The helium neon laser 1960 Ali Javan, William Bennett, Jr. and Donald Herriott 10 Neon and helium energy levels 11 Hole burning and the Lamb dip W. Bennett, Jr. 1961 12 Visible helium neon laser 1962 A. D. White and J. D. Rigden Granularity of scattered laser light 1962 J. D. Rigden and E. I. Gordon Laser speckle 13 Nonlinear optics: Optical second harmonic generation 1961 Peter Franken Gabriel Weinreich 14 Nonlinear optics: Two-Photon Transitions 1961 Wolfgang Geoffrey Kaiser Garrett 15 Phase matching in nonlinear optics 1961 J. Giordmaine / P. Maker, R. Terhune et al 16 Optical Second Harmonic Generation in Anisotropic Crystals 1961 17 Phase Matching in optical second harmonic generation 1961 Incident fundamental beam k1 and diffuse scattering k1’ generate phase matched second harmonic light on the cone k2 with k1 + k1’ = k2 18 The Q -switch laser 1961 R.
    [Show full text]
  • New “Moment of Discovery” Web Exhibit Explores Superconductivity
    CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS NEWSLETTER Vol. XXXIX, Number 2 Fall 2007 One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843, Tel. 301-209-3165 The Project to Document the History of Physicists in Industry: Some Notes on Methodology By Katy Lawley he Project to Document the History of Physicists in T Industry ends this December, and so far this year we’ve completed the last of the site visits and interviews at industrial labs—at Raytheon in January and Ford in June—and focused on analyzing the 132 interviews that we’ve conducted along with other information that we’ve collected. When we planned the study, we decided that individual interviews with physicists, R&D managers, and information professionals (e.g., technical librarians, archivists, and records managers) who work at 15 of the 27 largest employers of physicists in industry would be the best way to capture the experience and perspectives of the participants with as much richness and context as possible. Business in general has frequently been described as one of the least documented sectors in American society, and sources on the work of corporate physicists are especially rare. So our purpose has been to learn as much as we can about the extent to which these records do exist; how companies Pope Pius XII greets Professor and Mrs. Harlow Shapley following treat correspondence (including e-mail), lab notebooks, the Pope’s address to the International Union (IAU) assembly at and other documentary materials of scientists today; the Castel Gandolfo. Shapley had previously won the Pope Pius XI prize, effect of the computer revolution on records keeping; but had not personally appeared to receive it.
    [Show full text]