DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2013 - 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2013 - 2017 Flight Standards Directorate Air Operations Department EU Ramp inspection programme Annual Report 2013 - 2017 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2013 to 31 December 2017) TE.GEN.00400-004 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Page 1 of 119 Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union EU Ramp inspection programme - Annual Report 2013 - 2017 EU Ramp inspection programme Annual Report 2013 - 2017 Document ref. Status Date Final 17.04.2019 Contact name and address for enquiries: European Union Aviation Safety Agency Flight Standards Directorate Postfach 10 12 53 50452 Köln Germany [email protected] Information on EASA is available at: www.easa.europa.eu Report Distribution List: 1 European Commission, DG MOVE, E.4 2 Ramp inspection programme Participating States 3 EASA website TE.GEN.00400-004 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Page 2 of 119 Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union EU Ramp inspection programme - Annual Report 2013 - 2017 Table of Contents 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Development of the programme in the period 2013 – 2017 .................................................................... 6 2.1 Regulatory developments .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Data regular analysis .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 International promotion .................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 RAMP standardisation inspections .................................................................................................... 9 2.5 EASA centralised database ............................................................................................................... 10 3 Areas of inspection .................................................................................................................................. 10 4 Main results of the Ramp Inspections ..................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Inspection findings in general .......................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Inspection findings and their categories .......................................................................................... 12 4.3 Historical overview ........................................................................................................................... 14 4.4 Inspection findings on a regional basis ............................................................................................ 15 4.5 Inspection findings related to checklist items ................................................................................. 20 4.6 The top 4 significant and major inspection findings related to checklist items .............................. 20 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Appendix A – Data collection by Participating States 2013 - 2017 ................................................................. 22 Appendix B – List of States/Territories of inspected operators ...................................................................... 25 Appendix C – Aircraft types inspected (by manufacturer) .............................................................................. 32 Appendix D – Operators inspected ................................................................................................................. 39 Appendix E – Results (findings & inspections) per inspection item .............................................................. 110 Appendix E.1 – Inspection items concerning flight deck ............................................................................... 112 E.1.1 – A23 - Defect notification and rectification .................................................................................... 113 E.1.2 – A13 - Flight preparation ................................................................................................................. 113 E.1.3 – A04 - Manuals ................................................................................................................................ 113 E.1.4 – A01 - General condition ................................................................................................................. 113 Appendix E.2 – Inspection items concerning cabin safety ............................................................................ 114 E.2.1 – B01 - General internal condition ................................................................................................... 114 E.2.2 – B12 - Access to emergency exits .................................................................................................... 114 E.2.3 – B07 - Emergency exits, lighting and marking, torches ................................................................... 114 E.2.4 – B03 - First aid kit/emergency medical kit ...................................................................................... 115 Appendix E.3 – Inspection items concerning aircraft condition .................................................................... 116 E.3.1 – C01 - General external condition ................................................................................................... 116 E.3.2 – C07 - Powerplant and pylon .......................................................................................................... 116 E.3.3 – C02 - Door and hatches ................................................................................................................. 117 TE.GEN.00400-004 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Page 3 of 119 Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union EU Ramp inspection programme - Annual Report 2013 - 2017 E.3.4 – C04 - Wheels, tyres and brakes ..................................................................................................... 117 Appendix E.4/5 – Inspection items concerning cargo and general ............................................................... 118 E.4.1 – D03 - Cargo stowage ...................................................................................................................... 118 E.4.2 – D01 - General condition of cargo compartment ........................................................................... 118 E.4.3 – D02 - Dangerous goods .................................................................................................................. 118 E.4.4 – E01 - General ................................................................................................................................. 118 TE.GEN.00400-004 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Page 4 of 119 Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union EU Ramp inspection programme - Annual Report 2013 - 2017 1 Executive summary This report is issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October 2012, Annex II [PART- ARO], SECTION II - SUBPART RAMP, and specifically: ARO.RAMP.155 Annual report “The Agency shall prepare and submit to the Commission an annual report on the ramp inspection system containing at least the following information: (a) status of the progress of the system; (b) status of the inspections performed in the year; (c) analysis of the inspection results with the indication of the categories of findings; (d) actions taken during the year; (e) proposals for further improving the ramp inspection system, and (f) annexes containing lists of inspections sorted out by State of operation, type of aircraft, operator and ratios per item.” ARO.RAMP.160 Information to the public and protection of information (b) “The Agency shall publish an aggregated information report that shall be available to the public containing the analysis of the information received in accordance with ARO.RAMP.145. The report shall be simple and easy to understand, and the source of the information shall be de-identified.” Ramp inspections provide for a general indication of the safety of an operator; however, no full picture can be obtained on the safety of any particular aircraft or operator. Certain aspects are difficult to assess during a ramp inspection, mainly due to the limited time and information available. Nevertheless, the information gained through the EU Ramp Inspection Programme (hereafter referred to as the “Programme”) is an important element in the oversight performed by the responsible Aviation Authority (State of Operator, State of Registry and State of Licensing), as the findings raised: • Contribute to the safe operation of the aircraft inspected, by requiring that corrective actions are taken as appropriate,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Do Regional Airlines in Eastern Europe Have the Right to Survive in the European Single Sky Environment?
    AVIATION ISSN 1648-7788 / eISSN 1822-4180 2017 Volume 21(4): 155–161 doi:10.3846/16487788.2017.1415226 DO REGIONAL AIRLINES IN EASTERN EUROPE HAVE THE RIGHT TO SURVIVE IN THE EUROPEAN SINGLE SKY ENVIRONMENT? Sven KUKEMELK1, 2 1Nordic Aviation Group, Sepise 1, Tallinn, 11415, Estonia 2Tallinn University of Technology, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 June 2017; accepted 06 December 2017 Sven KUKEMELK Education: Estonian Aviation Academy (2010), Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (2012), Tallinn University of Technology, PhD studies (since 2013). Experience: 7 years of experience in network planning and aviation business analysis. Research interests: network planning, fleet development, commercial management. Present position: CEO of Nordic Aviation Advisory, Executive Director for Business Development at Nordic Aviation Group. Abstract. The European aviation market can be characterised by extreme growth and turbulence ever since the markets were deregulated and low cost carriers emerged on the continent. Initially the biggest toll was paid by main legacy carriers when low costs emerged on trunk routes, which lead to the bankruptcy of Sabena, Swiss airlines and Spanair. However, once big legacy carriers started merging and creating more alliances, sustainability was once again reached. Despite this, as low cost carriers entered the Eastern-European market and looked to stimulate even smaller regional routes, smaller carriers started to suffer. This article is assessing the status quo of the current European region- al aviation, highlighting the recent trends and ultimately coming to a conclusion that regional airlines can be sustaina- ble provided that certain key criteria have been met.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD AVIATION Yearbook 2013 EUROPE
    WORLD AVIATION Yearbook 2013 EUROPE 1 PROFILES W ESTERN EUROPE TOP 10 AIRLINES SOURCE: CAPA - CENTRE FOR AVIATION AND INNOVATA | WEEK startinG 31-MAR-2013 R ANKING CARRIER NAME SEATS Lufthansa 1 Lufthansa 1,739,886 Ryanair 2 Ryanair 1,604,799 Air France 3 Air France 1,329,819 easyJet Britis 4 easyJet 1,200,528 Airways 5 British Airways 1,025,222 SAS 6 SAS 703,817 airberlin KLM Royal 7 airberlin 609,008 Dutch Airlines 8 KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 571,584 Iberia 9 Iberia 534,125 Other Western 10 Norwegian Air Shuttle 494,828 W ESTERN EUROPE TOP 10 AIRPORTS SOURCE: CAPA - CENTRE FOR AVIATION AND INNOVATA | WEEK startinG 31-MAR-2013 Europe R ANKING CARRIER NAME SEATS 1 London Heathrow Airport 1,774,606 2 Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport 1,421,231 Outlook 3 Frankfurt Airport 1,394,143 4 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol 1,052,624 5 Madrid Barajas Airport 1,016,791 HE EUROPEAN AIRLINE MARKET 6 Munich Airport 1,007,000 HAS A NUMBER OF DIVIDING LINES. 7 Rome Fiumicino Airport 812,178 There is little growth on routes within the 8 Barcelona El Prat Airport 768,004 continent, but steady growth on long-haul. MostT of the growth within Europe goes to low-cost 9 Paris Orly Field 683,097 carriers, while the major legacy groups restructure 10 London Gatwick Airport 622,909 their short/medium-haul activities. The big Western countries see little or negative traffic growth, while the East enjoys a growth spurt ... ... On the other hand, the big Western airline groups continue to lead consolidation, while many in the East struggle to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathay Pacific Airways Fact Sheet
    CATHAY PACIFIC FACT SHEET Cathay Pacific Airways is a Hong Kong-based airline offering scheduled passenger and cargo services to nearly 200 destinations in Asia, North America, Australia, Europe and Africa, using a fleet of more than 140 wide-body aircraft. The company is a member of the Swire group and is a public company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Cathay Dragon is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cathay Pacific, and the airline also has a 60% stake in AHK Air Hong Kong Ltd, an all- cargo carrier operating regional express freight services. Cathay Pacific has made substantial investments to develop Hong Kong as one of the world's leading global transportation hubs. The airline is a founder member of the oneworld global alliance. Cathay Pacific was named “World’s Best Airline” four times in the Skytrax World Airline Awards. SENIOR MANAGEMENT Chairman John Slosar Chief Executive Officer Rupert Hogg Chief Customer and Commercial Officer Paul Loo Chief Operations and Service Delivery Officer Greg Hughes Chief Financial Officer Martin Murray Director People Tom Owen Director Service Delivery (and CEO Cathay Dragon) Algernon Yau Director Flight Operations Anna Thompson Director Customer Simon Large Director Commercial and Cargo Ronald Lam Director Engineering Neil Glenn FLEET SUMMARY Aircraft inventory: 146 Firm orders: 50 Average age of aircraft: 7.7 years Passenger Boeing 777-200 5 Airbus A350-900 9 aircraft Boeing 777-300 12 Airbus A350-1000 20 Boeing 777-300ER 53 Boeing 777-9X 21 Airbus A330-300 37 Airbus A350-900 19 Freighters Boeing 747-400ERF 6 Boeing 747-8F 14 Corporate Affairs Department 1 1 October 2017 NUMBER OF PEOPLE Cathay Pacific and Cathay Dragon employ 18,500 people in Hong Kong, making the company one of Hong Kong's biggest employers.
    [Show full text]
  • [Final Report]
    GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION COMMISSION 2013 FINAL REPORT ON THE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9N-ABO TWIN OTTER (DHC6/300) AIRCRAFT OWNED AND OPERATED BY NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION AT JOMSOM AIRPORT, MUSTANG DISTRICT, NEPAL ON 16 MAY 2013 [FINAL REPORT] SUBMITTED BY THE COMMISSION FOR THE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF CULTURE, TOURISM AND CIVIL AVIATION 18/2/2014 (6/11/ 2070 BS) FINAL REPORT ON THE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9N-ABO, TWIN OTTER (DHC-6/300) AIRCRAFT OWNED AND OPERATED BY 2013 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION AT JOMSOM AIRPORT MUSTANG DISTRICT, NEPAL ON 16 MAY 2013 FOREWORD This Final Report on the accident of the Chartered Flight of Nepal Airlines Corporation 9N-ABO, Twin Otter (DHC6/300) aircraft has been prepared by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission constituted by the Government of Nepal, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation, in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and Civil Aviation (Accident Investigation) Rules, 2024 B.S. to identify the probable cause of the accident and suggest remedial measures so as to prevent the recurrence of such accidents in future. The Commission carried out thorough investigation and extensive analysis of the available information and evidences, statements and interviews with concerned persons, study of reports, records and documents etc. The Commission had submitted some interim safety recommendations as immediate remedial measures. The Commission in its final report presented safety recommendations to be implemented by the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation, Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal and Nepal Airlines Corporation respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • E AAHNIKH AHMOKPATIA Yiioypreio YHOAOMON META
    E AAHNIKH AHMOKPATIA AGrjva, 4 Map-riot) 2016 YIIOYPrEIO YHOAOMON META^OPON & AIKTYON ApiOji. npoT. YlfflPEHIA nOAITIKHE AEPOnOPIAE 7875 TENIKH AIEY0YNEH AEPOMETA<DOPON A/NLH AEPOnOPIKHE EKMETAAAEYEHE TMHMA AIMEPON AEP/KON EYMOftNION Tax. AiEoGovoi]: T.e. 70360 166.10 FAixpd5a IIAi]po9opie$: A. OiAioYAou IIPOS: Onco^ o HivaKcrc; TijAecpcovo: (+30)-210-8916149 Ano8£KTOOV FAX: (+30)-210-8947132 E-mail: [email protected] @EMA: 5f|Aoooi]^ £v5ia<p£povro<; YICI a£ponopiK(bv YpctjiH^v npo^ano XC*)P£^ £KTO^ EE. ZXET.: (a) EK 847/2004 Ttepi «5ia}tpaY}idT£Dcrtjc, Kai £(pap]iOY?]$ TOV 0vj4<pG)Vid)v Jiepi a£pottopiK(bv ft£Ta<pop(bv ft£Ta£v Kparav fteAov mi Tph(ov}(cdpcbv». (p) Yn' api6.: Al/B/281 78/2647/19-07-07 E6viKd$ Kavovio^oc, (®EK B/1383/03-08-07 mi 2007/C 278/03/21-11-07 E^'OT/^T/ E(ptfti£pi6a E.E.) H YnrjpEota HoAiTiKf]^ Asponopia^ pdoei TOOV Siaxd^EOov TOOV avootEpco ava^spopEvoav Kavoviajicov npooKoAEi Tou<5 KOivoitKou^ aepojiETacpopEi^ 01 onoioi Eivai £YKaT£arr]}i£vot orr]v EAAdSa, va £K6i]Aa)oouv &v6iaq)£pov Yia T0 Siopiapo TOD^ npo^ EKTEAEOT] TaKTtKobv asponopiKcbv YP^ppobv npo^/ano X^P8? ^^-^ E.E. onco^ Kara nEpiinooor]/ A£irro|a£pcoc; Ejicpaivovxai orov aovrippEVO HivaKa. O EV AOY^O nivaKa^ nou rrepiAajipdvei TI^ npo^ £K]i£TdAA£uari YpdpF^^ KCU 01 OXETIKOI Kavoviafiot EXOUV avapii]6£i KQI orqv Enioripr] ioroo£Ai6a TI]C; YITA: www.hcaa.gr Enior]}iaiv£Tai OTI Yia TOV Siopiajio TCDV £v5iacp£po|i£vcov a£po|i£Tacpop£oov 0a £cpap]ioa6ot>v ta Kpufipia TOU ApOpoo 5 TOU oo^ dvoo avaq>£poji£vou E0vtKOu Kavoviojiou.
    [Show full text]
  • G410020002/A N/A Client Ref
    Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur G410020002/A N/A Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G410020002 G410020002 RETURN BIDS TO: Title – Sujet: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: PURCHASE OF AIR CARRIER FLIGHT MOVEMENT DATA AND AIR COMPANY PROFILE DATA Bids are to be submitted electronically Solicitation No. – N° de l’invitation Date by e-mail to the following addresses: G410020002 July 8, 2019 Client Reference No. – N° référence du client Attn : [email protected] GETS Reference No. – N° de reference de SEAG Bids will not be accepted by any File No. – N° de dossier CCC No. / N° CCC - FMS No. / N° VME other methods of delivery. G410020002 N/A Time Zone REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sollicitation Closes – L’invitation prend fin Fuseau horaire DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION at – à 02 :00 PM Eastern Standard on – le August 19, 2019 Time EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canadian Transportation Agency Address Inquiries to : - Adresser toutes questions à: Email: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right [email protected] of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. –de téléphone : FAX No. – N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any Destination – of Goods, Services, and Construction: attached sheets at the price(s) set out thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Practices for Commercial Operators
    OPERATIONS IN AIRSPACE CLASS E IN GERMANY BELOW FL100 RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATORS The following best practices have been developed by flight safety officers and experts to enhance the safety of operations in airspace Class E below FL100 to prevent collisions between controlled and uncontrolled aircraft in a mixed traffic environment. Recommendations for training departments and pilots • IMPROVE AIRSPACE AWARENESS Train pilots to be aware of shortfalls in the existing airspace structure – annual training and NOT only by bulletin using two components: o Generic briefing on airspace Class E in Germany o Dedicated airport briefing documents o Include risk and threats in unprotected airspace in individual departure and arrival briefing • OPERATING RECOMMENDATIONS o FLY DEFENSIVELY! o Maintain Minimum Clean Airspeed or as slow as reasonable o Request to use protected airspace – minimise time in airspace Class E and refuse shortcuts if necessary. Most standard departures and approaches/transitions will facilitate this. o Descend according to airspace structure on arrival. Steep/expedited climb through airspace Class E on departure. o Consider airspace structure for engine out procedures o Consider delaying take-off if conflict with other aircraft is anticipated • USE OF AUTOMATION IN AIRSPACE CLASS ECHO o Minimise visual approaches – they require additional attention and increase flight time in unprotected airspace o Maximise lookout capacity through use of automation (FMS/task sharing) • SEE AND AVOID o Maximise lookout
    [Show full text]
  • Hong-Kong-China.Pdf
    APEC Project: TWG 01 2014A Produced by International Air Transport Association Head Office Canada: 800 Place Victoria, PO Box 113 Montreal H4Z 1M1, Quebec, Canada www.iata.org/consulting For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2016 APEC Secretariat APEC#216-TO-01.9 Table of Contents Glossary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction to the project ......................................................................................................... 10 2. Approach followed and data used .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Data fueling the model ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Gap analysis ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Induction ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Connecting potential .................................................................................................................. 14 2.5 Demand growth .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regulamento (Ue) N
    11.2.2012 PT Jornal Oficial da União Europeia L 39/1 II (Atos não legislativos) REGULAMENTOS o REGULAMENTO (UE) N. 100/2012 DA COMISSÃO de 3 de fevereiro de 2012 o que altera o Regulamento (CE) n. 748/2009, relativo à lista de operadores de aeronaves que realizaram uma das atividades de aviação enumeradas no anexo I da Diretiva 2003/87/CE em ou após 1 de janeiro de 2006, inclusive, com indicação do Estado-Membro responsável em relação a cada operador de aeronave, tendo igualmente em conta a expansão do regime de comércio de licenças de emissão da União aos países EEE-EFTA (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE) A COMISSÃO EUROPEIA, 2003/87/CE e é independente da inclusão na lista de operadores de aeronaves estabelecida pela Comissão por o o força do artigo 18. -A, n. 3, da diretiva. Tendo em conta o Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da União Europeia, (5) A Diretiva 2008/101/CE foi incorporada no Acordo so­ bre o Espaço Económico Europeu pela Decisão o Tendo em conta a Diretiva 2003/87/CE do Parlamento Europeu n. 6/2011 do Comité Misto do EEE, de 1 de abril de e do Conselho, de 13 de Outubro de 2003, relativa à criação de 2011, que altera o anexo XX (Ambiente) do Acordo um regime de comércio de licenças de emissão de gases com EEE ( 4). efeito de estufa na Comunidade e que altera a Diretiva 96/61/CE o o do Conselho ( 1), nomeadamente o artigo 18. -A, n. 3, alínea a), (6) A extensão das disposições do regime de comércio de licenças de emissão da União, no setor da aviação, aos Considerando o seguinte: países EEE-EFTA implica que os critérios fixados nos o o termos do artigo 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Records of Nepalese Registered Helicopters
    Accident Records of Nepalese Registered Helicopters Date of A/C Reg. S.N. Type of A/C Operator/Owner Place of Accident Fatality Survival Remarks Accident No. 1 27/12/1979 9N RAE Allutte-III VVIP Langtang 6 0 2 27/04/1993 9N ACK Bell-206 Himalayan Helicopter Langtang 0 Closed operation 3 24/01/1996 9N ADM MI-17 Nepal Airways Sotang 0 3 Closed operation 4 30/09/1997 9N AEC AS-350 Karnali Air Thupten Choling 1 4 Closed operation 5 13/12/1997 9N ADT MI-17 Gorkha Airlines Kalikot 0 Closed operation 6 04/01/1998 9N RAL Bell-206 VVIP Flight Dipayal 7 24/10/1998 9N ACY AS-350B Asian Airlines Mul Khark 3 0 Closed operation Lisunkhu, 8 30/04/1999 9N AEJ AS-350BA Karnali Air 0 Closed operation Sindhupalchowk 9 31/05/1999 9N ADI AS-350B2 Manakamana Airways Ramechhap 0 Closed operation Renamed as Shree 10 11/09/2001 9N ADK MI-17 Air Ananya Mimi 0 5 Airlines 11 12/11/2001 9N AFP AS-350B Fishtail Air Rara Lake, Mugu 4 2 12 12/05/2002 9N AGE AS 350B2 Karnali Air Makalu Base Camp 0 1 Closed operation 13 30/09/2002 9N ACU MI-17 (MI8-MTV) Asian Airlines Sholumkhumbu* 0 None Closed operation 14 28/05/2003 9N ADP MI-17 IV Simrik Air Everest Base Camp 2 6 15 04/01/2005 9N AGG AS-350BA Air Dynasty Heli Service Thhose VDC, Ramechhap 3 None 16 02/06/2005 9N ADN MI-17 Shree Airlines Everest Base Camp.
    [Show full text]