Historic Resource Evaluation of for the Property Located at 1225 Allyn
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1225 ALLYN AVENUE, ST HELENA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Bob Branstad SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian Evans & De Shazo, LLC December 5, 2016 Evans & De Shazo, LLC 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 971-244-1836/707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 3 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................ 3 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ................................................................................ 5 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ...................................................................................................... 5 LOCAL REGULATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 CITY OF ST. HELENA HISTORIC RESOURCES .......................................................................................................... 6 Implementing Actions ........................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODS ........................................................................................................... 7 HISTORIC CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 7 MEXICAN PERIOD (1821 – 1848) ................................................................................................................... 7 AMERICAN PERIOD (1848 - PRESENT) ................................................................................................................... 8 Development of the Town of St. Helena ............................................................................................................... 8 DEVELOPMENT OF WORLD WAR II ERA COTTAGE ARCHITECTURE (1935 – 1952) .................................................... 9 LITERATURE SEARCH AND REVIEW ...................................................................... 9 LOCAL AND ONLINE RESEARCH ......................................................................................................................... 9 RESULTS OF THE LITERATURE SEARCH AND REVIEW ........................................................................................... 10 PROPERTY HISTORY ...................................................................................................................................... 11 HISTORIC RESOURCE FIELD SURVEY .................................................................. 15 ca. 1952 House .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Northeast Elevation (Primary Façade) ................................................................................................................ 16 Southeast Elevation ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Southwest Elevation ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Northwest Elevation............................................................................................................................................ 21 Interior ................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Landscape ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 Neighborhood Setting ......................................................................................................................................... 23 EVALUATION FOR HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE ................................................... 24 EVALUATION CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 24 California Register of Historical Resources ......................................................................................................... 24 CRHR Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................. 24 Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page i CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ 25 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................ 26 Appendix A: DRP 523 Forms Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page ii INTRODUCTION Evans & De Shazo, LLC (EDS) was contracted by Bob Branstad to conduct a Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) of the property located at 1225 Allyn Avenue, St. Helena, Napa County, California. The property contains a ca. 1952 house that is situated within the 0.24-acre lot known as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 009-311-013-000 (Project Area). The house is not currently listed on any local, state, or federal historic inventory. The project entails the proposed demolition of the ca. 1952 house and the construction of a new house (Project). As such, the City of St. Helena is requiring an HRE be completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of St. Helena General Plan Historic Resources Element (Chapter 6) to determine if demolition of the ca. 1952 house will impact historical resources. The HRE was completed by Principal Architectural Historian, Stacey De Shazo, who holds an M.A. in Historic Preservation and exceeds the Secretary of Interior’s professional qualification standards for Architectural History and History. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project entails the proposed demolition of the ca. 1952 house and the construction of a new single- family hybridCore house within the 10,660-square foot parcel. An HRE was required by the City of St. Helena to address potential significant impacts to historical resources under CEQA. The HRE will ensure compliance with the CEQA and the City of St. Helena General Plan Historic Resources Element (Chapter 6). PROJECT LOCATION The Project Area includes the parcel (APN 009-311-013-000) at 1225 Allyn Avenue, located approximately 190 feet northwest of Spring Street and 330 feet southwest of Tainter Street. The Project Area is located on USGS St. Helena 7.5-minute (1960; 1993) and Rutherford 7.5-minute (1951; 1973) quadrangle maps within the Mexican-era land grant of Carne de Humana within unsectioned land of Township 8 North, Range 6 West, extended (Figure 1). Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page 3 Figure 1. Project Location Map, showing the Project Area. Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page 4 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CEQA and the Guidelines for Implementing CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5) give direction and guidance for evaluation of properties and the preparation of Initial Studies, Categorical Exemptions, Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports. Pursuant to California State law, the City of St. Helena is legally responsible and accountable for determining the environmental impact of any land use proposal it approves. Cultural resources are aspects of the environment that require identification and assessment for potential significance under CEQA (14 CCR 15064.5 and PRC 21084.1). There are five classes of cultural resources defined by the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). These are: Building: A structure created principally to shelter or assist in carrying out any form of human activity. A “building” may also be used to refer to a historically and functionally related unit, such as a courthouse and jail or a house and barn. Structure: A construction made for a functional purpose rather than creating human shelter. Examples include mines, bridges, and tunnels. Object: Construction primarily artist in nature or relatively small in scale and simply constructed. It may be movable by nature or design or made for a specific setting or environment. Objects should be in a setting appropriate to their significant historic use or character. Examples include fountains, monuments, maritime resources, sculptures and boundary markers. Site: The location of a significant event. A prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archaeological value regardless of the value of any existing building, structure, or object. A site need not be marked by physical remains if it is the location of a prehistoric or historic event and if no buildings, structures, or objects marked it at that time. Examples include trails, designed landscapes, battlefields, habitation sites, Native American ceremonial areas, petroglyphs, and pictographs. Historic District: Unified geographic entities which contain a concentration of historic buildings, structures, or sites united historically, culturally, or architecturally. According to California Code of Regulations Section 15064.5, cultural resources are historically significant if they are: