Preserving Calistoga: a Management Framework

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preserving Calistoga: a Management Framework PRESERVING CALISTOGA: A MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR A LIVING LANDSCAPE IN THE NAPA VALLEY by LILLIAN SAVANNAH MILLER (Under the Direction of Cari Goetcheus) ABSTRACT The city of Calistoga located in the upper Napa Valley is a living cultural landscape defined by product and processes associated with agriculture and tourism. While the historic fabric remains largely intact, development pressures due to a paucity of adequate preservation mechanisms seriously threatens the historic integrity of Calistoga‘s cultural landscape. This thesis identifies appropriate and innovative techniques to encourage preservation of Calistoga‘s historic resources and the relationships that exist between them. A thorough investigation of the developmental history of the city and the national preservation movement provides a basis from which to analyze the landscape characteristics and understand Calistoga‘s regulatory framework in a larger context. The relationships existing between the various sources of information illuminate the strengths and shortcomings of the current status quo and act as the basis for management recommendations. INDEX WORDS: Calistoga, California, Cultural Landscape, Agriculture, Regulatory Framework, Preservation Mechanisms, Management Framework PRESERVING CALISTOGA: A MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR A LIVING LANDSCAPE IN THE NAPA VALLEY by LILLIAN SAVANNAH MILLER B.A., The University of California at Davis, 2007 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2013 © 2013 Lillian Savannah Miller All Rights Reserved PRESERVING CALISTOGA: A MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR A LIVING LANDSCAPE IN THE NAPA VALLEY by LILLIAN SAVANNAH MILLER Major Professor: Cari Goetcheus Committee: Mark Reinberger Marianne Cramer Pratt Cassity Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2013 DEDICATION To Domenick and to my Dad. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge Denina Fredrickson and Napa County Landmarks for providing me with inspiration to pursue this thesis topic. I would like to thank all who have aided in the development of this thesis: the Calistoga Planning Office, past and current residents of Calistoga, Napa County Department of Conservation, Development and Planning, and the California Historic Preservation Office. Most of all I would like to acknowledge Professor Cari Goetcheus whose insight, enthusiasm for the topic and encouragement was invaluable. Mark Twain once said, ―Keep away from people who belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that, but the really great make you feel that you too can become great.‖ Cari, you are one of the greats. Thank you! v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 Research Question ................................................................................................. 2 Research Methods .................................................................................................. 5 Structure ................................................................................................................. 6 2 THE EVOLUTION OF CALISTOGA‘S LANDSCAPE ............................................ 8 Natural History .................................................................................................... 10 The Native American Period: Pre-1820s ............................................................. 18 The Spanish Period: 1823-1830s ......................................................................... 19 The Mexican Period: 1834-1846 ......................................................................... 20 The Early American Period: 1840-1857 .............................................................. 21 Calistoga: The Saratoga of California: 1857-1875 .............................................. 24 The Middle American Period: 1900-1960 ........................................................... 31 The Current American Period: 1960 -2012 ......................................................... 33 Existing Conditions: 2012-2013 .......................................................................... 38 3 EVOLUTION OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPE THEORY, PRESERVATION THEORY &TECHNIQUES, AND THEIR APPLICATION TO CALISTOGA ...... 47 Early Preservation Precedent ............................................................................... 48 Articulating the Cultural Landscape .................................................................... 49 vi Taking the Cultural Landscape Seriously ............................................................ 52 Standardization of Theory and Techniques ......................................................... 56 Where We Stand Now ......................................................................................... 59 Application to Calistoga ....................................................................................... 61 4 CALISTOGA‘S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................... 63 Controls ................................................................................................................ 65 Controls: Planning and Development .................................................................. 65 Controls: Natural Resources and Open Space ..................................................... 75 Controls: Cultural and Historic Resources .......................................................... 78 Controls: Circulation and Transportation ............................................................ 81 Incentives ............................................................................................................. 82 Incentives: Planning and Development ............................................................... 82 Incentives: Natural Resources and Open Space ................................................... 84 Incentives: Cultural and Historic Resources ........................................................ 90 Incentives: Transportation and Circulation .......................................................... 93 Summary .............................................................................................................. 94 5 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION ............................................................................ 96 Analysis of Physical Resources ........................................................................... 98 Analysis of Landscape Characteristics ................................................................ 98 Analysis of Policy .............................................................................................. 121 Analysis of Controls .......................................................................................... 122 Analysis of Incentives ........................................................................................ 125 Summary ............................................................................................................ 129 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 131 Resource Types Deserving of Protection ........................................................... 131 Review of Issues and Threats ............................................................................ 132 vii How to think about Preservation........................................................................ 133 Recommendations by Activity ........................................................................... 134 Summary ............................................................................................................ 143 7 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 145 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................147 APPENDICES A RESOURCES AND PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES ...................................... 153 B IDENTIFIED HISTORIC RESOURCES IN UNINCORPORATED AREA .......... 154 C GLOSSARY OF TERMS ........................................................................................ 160 viii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Organization of Controls and Incentives ......................................................................... 64 Table 2: Controls ........................................................................................................................... 94 Table 3: Incentives ......................................................................................................................... 95 Table 4: Historic Periods of Development that Influenced Essence of Calistoga ......................... 98 Table 5: Controls Deserving Further Consideration .................................................................... 123 Table 6: Incentives Deserving Further Consideration ................................................................. 125 ix LIST
Recommended publications
  • Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates 1405 Sutter Lane Bakersfield, California 93309
    A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY At 611 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY OF CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Corporation for Better Housing 5947 Variel Avenue Woodland Hills, California 91367 Keywords: Calistoga 7.5' Quadrangle, City of Calistoga, National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Submitted by: Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates 1405 Sutter Lane Bakersfield, California 93309 Author: Scott M. Hudlow October 2015 Management Summary At the request of Corporation for Better Housing, a Phase I Cultural Resource Survey was conducted at an approximate .95-acre site for a proposed multi- family residential project, at 611 Washington Street, City of Calistoga, California. The Phase I Cultural Resource Survey consisted of a pedestrian survey of the .95- acre site and a cultural resource record search. No cultural resources were identified. No further work is required. If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified archaeologist should be consulted for further evaluation. If human remains or potential human remains are observed during construction, work in the vicinity of the remains will cease, and they will be treated in accordance with the provisions of State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. The protection of human remains follows California Public Resources Codes, Sections 5097.94, 5097.98, and 5097.99. 2 Table of Contents Management Summary .................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Condition Assessment and Evaluation of the Property Located at 1305 Stockton Street, St. Helena, Napa County, California
    CURRENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1305 STOCKTON STREET, ST. HELENA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Tom and Katie Leonardini c/o Nick Brereton Consulting Architects SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc 1141 Gravenstein Highway South, March 12, 2020 Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-823-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROPERTY LOCATION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 REGULATORY SETTING ............................................................................................................................................. 2 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT .......................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORIES ...................................................................................................................................... 3 LOCAL AND ONLINE RESEARCH ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.E Noise Introduction This Section Summarizes Information on the Noise Environment in the St
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.E Noise Introduction This section summarizes information on the noise environment in the St. Helena planning area and provides an evaluation of the noise-related effects of the proposed General Plan Update. The analysis considers existing and projected noise along major roadways, in addition to other noise sources in the area. Mitigation measures are recommended that address General Plan Update policies and implementing actions. The noise element of a city’s general plan is a comprehensive approach for including noise control in the planning process. It is a tool for achieving and maintaining environmental noise levels that are compatible with specific land use types. The Public Health, Safety and Noise Element of the proposed General Plan Update identifies noise-sensitive land uses and noise sources, defines areas of noise impact, and establishes goals, policies, and implementing actions to protect people from excessive noise and vibration. Setting Background Information on Noise Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable Noise is defined as unwanted because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could sound. be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F: Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment
    City of Calistoga – Enchanted Resorts Project Draft EIR Appendix F: Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\3808\38080001\3 - Draft EIR\38080001_Sec99-00 Appendix Dividers.doc Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment Enchanted Resorts Project City of Calistoga, Napa, California Calistoga, California, USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle Map Township 8 North, Range 6 West and Township 8 North, Range 7 West of the Rancho Carne Humana Land Grant 88-acre Study Area Prepared for: City of Calistoga Planning and Building Department 1232 Washington Street Calistoga, CA 94515 707.942.2827 Attn: Erik Lundquist, Senior Planner Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates Bishop Ranch 3 2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 460 San Ramon, CA 94583 925.830.2733 Author/Contact: Carrie D. Wills, Senior Project Archaeologist Fieldwork Conducted By: Carrie D. Wills Fieldwork Conducted On: September 8 and 21, 2010 Report Date: November 5, 2010 Keywords: Calistoga, California, USGS topographic quadrangle map, Napa River City of Calistoga - Enchanted Resorts Project Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction.........................................................................................................3 1.1 - Project Location .................................................................................................. 3 1.2 - Project Description.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation of for the Property Located at 1225 Allyn
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1225 ALLYN AVENUE, ST HELENA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Bob Branstad SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian Evans & De Shazo, LLC December 5, 2016 Evans & De Shazo, LLC 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 971-244-1836/707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 3 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................ 3 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ................................................................................ 5 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ...................................................................................................... 5 LOCAL REGULATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 CITY OF ST. HELENA HISTORIC RESOURCES .......................................................................................................... 6 Implementing Actions ........................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODS ........................................................................................................... 7 HISTORIC CONTEXT
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation for 1513 Madrona Avenue, St. Helena, Napa County
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION FOR 1513 MADRONA AVENUE, ST. HELENA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Mary Sikes Mary Sikes & Associates 1461 Railroad Ave # 200 St Helena, CA 94574 SUBMITTED BY: Brian Matuk, M.S. Senior Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc 6876 Sebastopol Avenue, Sebastopol, CA 95472 May 21, 2018 707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION.................................................................................................................. 1 REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................................................................................... 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ......................................................................................................................... 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 4 LOCAL REGULATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODS .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 HISTORIC SETTING .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation of for St Helena Estates and Winery Project Located Pope Street, St Helena, Napa County, Californi
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF FOR ST HELENA ESTATES AND WINERY PROJECT LOCATED POPE STREET , ST HELENA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Greg Desmond SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] updated December 11, 2017 Evans & De Shazo, LLC 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 971-244-1836/707-812-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 3 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................ 3 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ................................................................................ 5 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ...................................................................................................... 5 LOCAL REGULATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 CITY OF ST. HELENA HISTORIC RESOURCE ELEMENT (7.0) ......................................................................................... 6 Guiding Policies .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODS ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources (Includes Historical and Archaeological Resources )
    NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT . CHAPTER 14 CULTURAL RESOURCES (INCLUDES HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ) PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to provide a CHRONOLOGY OF UPDATES summary of known cultural resources in Napa County. This chapter is based on the review of NOVEMBER 30, 2005—VERSION 1 numerous existing background reports and publications that contain information on prehistoric, historic, scientific, and cultural resources in Napa County. This document and the data assembled provide broad tools for site and regional planning as well as the basis for future planning documents relating to the protection and management of the County’s rich cultural resources. HISTORIC WINE CAVE, CONSTRUCTED IN 1882 NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES FIGURES TABLE OF CONTENTS On page INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................14-1 14-1 Ethnographic Territories of the Wappo, Patwin and Surrounding Tribes ..............................14-9 Purpose ................................................................................................................................14-1 Specialized Terms Used.......................................................................................................14-1 MAPS POLICY CONSIDERATIONS..............................................................................................................14-1 Federal Policies ....................................................................................................................14-1
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation for the Veranda at Indian Springs Resort Project, Calistoga, Napa County, California
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION FOR THE VERANDA AT INDIAN SPRINGS RESORT PROJECT, CALISTOGA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Olivia Ervin | Principal Planner M-Group [email protected] SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc 1141 Gravenstein Highway South, March 12, 2020 Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-823-7400 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................................. 1 REGULATORY SETTING ............................................................................................................................................. 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT .......................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORIES ...................................................................................................................................... 5 ONLINE RESEARCH ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bale Family Papers, [Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf9t1nb4dz No online items Guide to the Bale Family Papers, [ca. 1841-1899] Processed by The Bancroft Library staff The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, California --History, Bay Area Guide to the Bale Family Papers, BANC MSS C-B 746 1 [ca. 1841-1899] Guide to the Bale Family Papers, [ca. 1841-1899] Collection number: BANC MSS C-B 746 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: The Bancroft Library staff Date Completed: ca. 1968 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Bale Family Papers, Date (inclusive): [ca. 1841-1899] Collection Number: BANC MSS C-B 746 Creator: Bales Family Extent: Number of containers: 2 boxes and 1 oversize folder Repository: The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Some accounts and legal papers of Dr. Edward T. Bale and papers relating to the establishment of his flour and saw mills in Napa Co., 1841-1849; personal and business papers of his wife, Maria I.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps of Private Land Grant Cases of California, [Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb8489p15p Online items available Finding Aid to the Maps of Private Land Grant Cases of California, [ca. 1840-ca. 1892] Finding aid written by Mary W. Elings Funding for processing this collection was provided by the University of California Library. The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected]/ URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 2004 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Maps of LAND CASE MAP 1 Private Land Grant Cases of California, [ca. 1840-ca. 1892] Finding Aid to the Maps of Private Land Grant Cases of California, [ca. 1840-ca. 1892] Collection number: LAND CASE MAP The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected]/ URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Funding for processing this collection was provided by the University of California Library. Finding Aid Author(s): Finding aid written by Mary W. Elings Date Completed: December 2004 Finding Aid Encoded By: GenX © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Maps of private land grant cases of California Date (inclusive): [ca. 1840-ca. 1892] Collection Number: LAND CASE MAP Creator: United States. District Court (California) Extent: ca. 1,450 ms. maps : some hand col.1396 digital objects (1862 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected]/ URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Abstract: Placed on permanent deposit in The Bancroft Library by the U.S.
    [Show full text]