DOCSLIB.ORG

4.E Noise Introduction This Section Summarizes Information on the Noise Environment in the St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.E Noise Introduction This Section Summarizes Information on the Noise Environment in the St 4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.E Noise Introduction This section summarizes information on the noise environment in the St. Helena planning area and provides an evaluation of the noise-related effects of the proposed General Plan Update. The analysis considers existing and projected noise along major roadways, in addition to other noise sources in the area. Mitigation measures are recommended that address General Plan Update policies and implementing actions. The noise element of a city’s general plan is a comprehensive approach for including noise control in the planning process. It is a tool for achieving and maintaining environmental noise levels that are compatible with specific land use types. The Public Health, Safety and Noise Element of the proposed General Plan Update identifies noise-sensitive land uses and noise sources, defines areas of noise impact, and establishes goals, policies, and implementing actions to protect people from excessive noise and vibration. Setting Background Information on Noise Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable Noise is defined as unwanted because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could sound. be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave. In addition to the concepts of pitch and loudness, there are several noise measurement scales that are used to describe noise in a particular location. A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement that indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a logarithmic basis. Thus, an increase of 10 decibels represents a ten-fold increase in acoustic energy, while 20 decibels is 100 times more intense, 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense, and so on. There is a relationship between the subjective noisiness or loudness of a sound and its intensity. Each 10-decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities. Technical terms are defined in Table 4.E-1. St. Helena General Plan Update 4.E-1 May 2016 Revised Draft EIR 4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures E. Noise TABLE 4.E-1 DEFINITIONS OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS Term Definitions Decibel, dB A unit describing, the amplitude of sound, equal to 10 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of two like quantities. Sound Pressure Level Sound pressure is the sound force per unit area, usually (SPL) expressed in micro Pascals (or 20 micro Newtons per square meter), where 1 Pascal is the pressure resulting from a force of 1 Newton exerted over an area of 1 square meter. The sound pressure level is expressed in decibels as 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the pressures exerted by the sound to a reference sound pressure (e.g., 20 micro Pascals).Ten times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the square of the sound to the square of the reference sound pressure of 20u Pascals Sound pressure level is the quantity that is directly measured by a sound level meter and expressed in dB. Frequency, Hz The number of complete pressure fluctuations per second above and below atmospheric pressure. Normal human hearing is between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz. A-Weighted Sound The SPL in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using Level, dBA the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de- emphasizes low and high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear. Noise Unwanted or unhealthful sound. Equivalent Noise Level, The average A-weighted sound level during the measurement Leq period. The A-weighted equivalent continuous sound level Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound level during the measurement period with the sound meter using the fast time weighting. L01, L10, L50, L90 The A-weighted sound levels that are exceeded 1%, 1 %, 50 %, and 90 % of the time during the measurement period. Day/Night Noise Level, The average A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, Ldn or DNL obtained after the addition of 10 decibels to levels measured at night between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. Total Sound The composite of sound from all sources, near and far. Ambient Sound The sound level measured in the absence of an intrusive or extraneous noise. Intrusive Noise The noise from a source of specific origin which intrudes above the existing background sound level. The degree of intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as in contrast to the prevailing background sound level which exists in the absence of the intrusive noise. Background Sound The LA90 of the ambient sound. It represents the ever-present Level lower sound level due to distant sources which are individually indistinguishable, and in the absence of the intrusive or extraneous noise. Extraneous Noise Specific or distinguishable intermittent sound. It represents sound from nearby sources such as mechanical devices, leaf blowers, pumps, horns, sirens, barking, shouting, birds, wind and other similar individual sources, which don’t normally exist on a continuous or regular basis. SOURCE: Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, Harris, 1998. St. Helena General Plan Update 4.E-2 May 2016 Revised Draft EIR 4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures E. Noise There are several methods of characterizing sound. The most common in California is the A-weighted sound level or dBA. This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. Representative outdoor and indoor noise levels in units of dBA are shown in Table 4.E-2. Because sound levels can vary markedly over a short period of time, a method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be used. Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. The most common averaging period is hourly, but Leq can describe any series of noise events of arbitrary duration. The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus 1 dBA. Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends upon the distance the receptor is from the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus 1 to 2 dBA. Since the sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night – because excessive noise interferes with the ability to sleep – 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. The Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL, is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in a community, with a 5-dB penalty added to evening (7:00 PM - 10:00 PM) and a 10 dB-addition to nocturnal (10:00 PM - 7:00 AM) noise levels. The Day/Night Average Sound Level, DNL or Ldn, is essentially the same as CNEL, with the exception that the evening time period (7 p.m to 10 p.m) is dropped and all occurrences during this three-hour period are grouped into the daytime period. Effects of Noise Sleep and Speech Interference The thresholds for speech interference indoors are about 45 dBA if the noise Steady noise of sufficient is steady and above 55 dBA if the noise is fluctuating. Outdoors, the intensity (above 30 dBA) and thresholds are about 15 dBA higher. Steady noise of sufficient intensity fluctuating noise levels above about 45 dBA have been shown (above 30 dBA) and fluctuating noise levels above about 45 dBA have been to affect sleep. shown to affect sleep. Typically, the highest steady traffic noise level during the daytime is about equal to the Ldn and nighttime levels are 10 dBA lower. St. Helena General Plan Update 4.E-3 May 2016 Revised Draft EIR 4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures E. Noise The interior noise standard for multi-family dwellings is set by the State of California at 45 dBA Ldn. The standard is designed for sleep and speech TABLE 4.E-2 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS IN THE ENVIRONMENT Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities Jet fly-over at 1,000 feet 110 dBA Rock band Gas lawn mower at 3 feet 100 dBA Food blender at 3 feet Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph 90 dBA Garbage disposal at 3 feet Noisy urban area, daytime 80 dBA Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet Gas lawn mower, 100 feet 70 dBA Normal speech at 3 feet Commercial area Heavy traffic at 300 feet 60 dBA Large business office Quiet urban daytime 50 dBA Dishwasher in next room Quiet urban nighttime 40 dBA Theater, large conference room Quiet suburban nighttime 30 dBA Library Bedroom at night, concert hall Quiet rural nighttime 10 dBA (background) 0 dBA SOURCE: Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), Caltrans, September 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS the VERANDA at INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1
    MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS THE VERANDA AT INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 LINCOLN AVE CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA July 16, 2020 Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Group 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B Napa, California 94559 Attention: Ms. Olivia Ervin Prepared by Monk & Associates, Inc. 1136 Saranap Avenue, Suite Q Walnut Creek, California 94595 Contact: Ms. Sarah Lynch 1136 Saranap Ave., Suite Q Walnut Creek California 94595 (925) 947-4867 FAX (925) 947-1165 Biological Resources Constraints Analysis MONK & ASSOCIATES The Veranda at Indian Springs 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 Lincoln Ave Calistoga, California APNs 011‐034‐003; ‐004; -005; ‐006; ‐021; ‐022; 028; ‐029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................................... 1 3. STUDY METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 1 4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES .................................... 2 4.1 Evaluation for Waters of the U.S. and Waters of the State .................................................... 3 4.1.1 APPLICABILITY TO THE PROJECT SITE..................................................................................... 3 5. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ISSUES .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of an Industry: the Role of the Bracero Program in the Growth of Viticulture in Sonoma and Napa Counties
    THE HEART OF AN INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF THE BRACERO PROGRAM IN THE GROWTH OF VITICULTURE IN SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES by Zachary A. Lawrence A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Copyright 2005 By Zachary A. Lawrence ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTER’S THESIS I grant permission for the reproduction of parts of this thesis without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorbs the cost and provide proper acknowledgement of authorship. Permission to reproduce this thesis in its entirety must be obtained from me. iii THE HEART OF AN INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF THE BRACERO PROGRAM IN THE GROWTH OF VITICULTURE IN SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES Thesis by Zachary A. Lawrence ABSTRACT This study examines the role of the Bracero Program in the growth of Sonoma and Napa County viticulture in an attempt to understand how important bracero labor was to the industry. While most histories of the Bracero Program are nationwide or statewide in scope, this study explores the regional complexities of how and why the program was used in Sonoma and Napa Counties, how both the growers and laborers in the region felt about it, and how this was different from and similar to other regions. Government documents provided the statistics necessary to determine the demographic changes in the region due to the Bracero Program. Important primary source material that provided the human side of the story includes a number of oral history interviews I conducted, the collection of Wine Industry Oral Histories, and various regional newspaper articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenomén K-Pop a Jeho Sociokulturní Kontexty Phenomenon K-Pop and Its
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PEDAGOGICKÁ FAKULTA Katedra hudební výchovy Fenomén k-pop a jeho sociokulturní kontexty Phenomenon k-pop and its socio-cultural contexts Diplomová práce Autorka práce: Bc. Eliška Hlubinková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Filip Krejčí, Ph.D. Olomouc 2020 Poděkování Upřímně děkuji vedoucímu práce Mgr. Filipu Krejčímu, Ph.D., za jeho odborné vedení při vypracovávání této diplomové práce. Dále si cením pomoci studentů Katedry asijských studií univerzity Palackého a členů české k-pop komunity, kteří mi pomohli se zpracováním tohoto tématu. Děkuji jim za jejich profesionální přístup, rady a celkovou pomoc s tímto tématem. Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně s použitím uvedené literatury a dalších informačních zdrojů. V Olomouci dne Podpis Anotace Práce se zabývá hudebním žánrem k-pop, historií jeho vzniku, umělci, jejich rozvojem, a celkovým vlivem žánru na společnost. Snaží se přiblížit tento styl, který obsahuje řadu hudebních, tanečních a kulturních směrů, široké veřejnosti. Mimo samotnou podobu a historii k-popu se práce věnuje i temným stránkám tohoto fenoménu. V závislosti na dostupnosti literárních a internetových zdrojů zpracovává historii žánru od jeho vzniku až do roku 2020, spolu s tvorbou a úspěchy jihokorejských umělců. Součástí práce je i zpracování dvou dotazníků. Jeden zpracovává názor české veřejnosti na k-pop, druhý byl mířený na českou k-pop komunitu a její myšlenky ohledně tohoto žánru. Abstract This master´s thesis is describing music genre k-pop, its history, artists and their own evolution, and impact of the genre on society. It is also trying to introduce this genre, full of diverse music, dance and culture movements, to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Planning Department’S Property Information Map)
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 DATE: September 24, 2014 San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 TO: Chris Haegglund, BAR Architects Reception: 415.558.6378 FROM: Joshua Switzky, Planning Department Fax: RE: PPA Case No. 2014.1105U for 3140-50 161h Street 415.558.6409 Planning Information: 415.558.6377 Please find the attached Preliminary Project Assessment (PPA) for the address listed above. You may contact the staff contact, Audrey Desmuke, at (415) 575-9136 or [email protected], to answer any questions you may have, or to schedule a follow-up meeting. Preliminary Project Assessment Date: September 24, 2014 Case No.: 2014.1105U Project Address: 3140-50 16th Street Block/Lot: 3555/018 Zoning: Valencia St NCT (Neighborhood Commercial Transit) Zoning District 55-X Height and Bulk District Mission Alcoholic Beverage Special Use Subdistrict Area Plan: Mission Area Plan Project Sponsor: Chris Haegglund, BAR Architects 415-293-7160 Staff Contact: Audrey Desmuke – 415-575-9136 [email protected] DISCLAIMERS: Please be advised that this determination does not constitute an application for development with the Planning Department. It also does not represent a complete review of the proposed project, a project approval of any kind, or in any way supersede any required Planning Department approvals listed below. The Planning Department may provide additional comments regarding the proposed project once the required applications listed below are submitted. While some approvals are granted by the Planning Department, some are at the discretion of other bodies, such as the Planning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission. Additionally, it is likely that the project will require approvals from other City agencies such as the Department of Building Inspection, Department of Public Works, Department of Public Health, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates 1405 Sutter Lane Bakersfield, California 93309
    A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY At 611 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY OF CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Corporation for Better Housing 5947 Variel Avenue Woodland Hills, California 91367 Keywords: Calistoga 7.5' Quadrangle, City of Calistoga, National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Submitted by: Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates 1405 Sutter Lane Bakersfield, California 93309 Author: Scott M. Hudlow October 2015 Management Summary At the request of Corporation for Better Housing, a Phase I Cultural Resource Survey was conducted at an approximate .95-acre site for a proposed multi- family residential project, at 611 Washington Street, City of Calistoga, California. The Phase I Cultural Resource Survey consisted of a pedestrian survey of the .95- acre site and a cultural resource record search. No cultural resources were identified. No further work is required. If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified archaeologist should be consulted for further evaluation. If human remains or potential human remains are observed during construction, work in the vicinity of the remains will cease, and they will be treated in accordance with the provisions of State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. The protection of human remains follows California Public Resources Codes, Sections 5097.94, 5097.98, and 5097.99. 2 Table of Contents Management Summary .................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boraginaceae), with an Emphasis on the Popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys)
    Diversification, biogeography, and classification of Amsinckiinae (Boraginaceae), with an emphasis on the popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys) By Christopher Matthew Guilliams A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Professor David Ackerly Professor Brent Mishler Professor Patrick O'Grady Summer 2015 Abstract Diversification, biogeography, and classification of Amsinckiinae (Boraginaceae), with an emphasis on the popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys) by Christopher Matthew Guilliams Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Amsinckiinae is a diverse and ecologically important subtribe of annual herbaceous or perennial suffrutescent taxa with centers of distribution in western North America and southern South America. Taxa in the subtribe occur in all major ecosystems in California and more broadly in western North America, from the deserts of Baja California in the south where Johnstonella and Pectocarya are common, north to the ephemeral wetland ecosystems of the California Floristic Province where a majority of Plagiobothrys sect. Allocarya taxa occur, and east to the Basin and Range Province of western North America, where Cryptantha sensu stricto (s.s.) and Oreocarya are well represented. The subtribe minimally includes 9 genera: Amsinckia, Cryptantha s.s., Eremocarya, Greeneocharis, Harpagonella, Johnstonella, Oreocarya, Pectocarya, and Plagiobothrys; overall minimum-rank taxonomic diversity in the subtribe is ca. 330-342 taxa, with ca. 245--257 taxa occurring in North America, 86 in South America, and 4 in Australia. Despite their prevalence on the landscape and a history of active botanical research for well over a century, considerable research needs remain in Amsinckiinae, especially in one of the two largest genera, Plagiobothrys.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Creek Weed Management Project ISMND
    NAPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT Pope Creek Weed Management Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2019 For accessibility assistance with this document, please contact the Napa County Resource Conservation District (NCRCD) at 707-252-4189, fax to 707-252-4219, or through the California Relay Service by dialing 711. This document includes complex figures and tables that may be difficult to interpret using an assistive device such as a screen reader. NAPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT Pope Creek Weed Management Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for: Napa County Resource Conservation District 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 500B Napa, California 94559 Prepared by: Horizon Water and Environment, LLC 266 Grand Avenue, Suite 210 Oakland, California 94610 Contact: Ken Schwarz (510) 986-1851 December 2019 Horizon Water and Environment. 2019. Pope Creek Weed Management Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. December. (HWE 18.032) Oakland, CA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Location ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Intent and Scope of this Document ............................................................... 1-3 1.4 Organization of this Document .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Superm 1St Mini Album Download Prostudiomasters.Com
    superm 1st mini album download ProStudioMasters.com. High-resolution audio offers the highest-fidelity available, far surpassing the sound quality of traditional CDs. When you listen to music on a CD or tracks purchased via consumer services such as iTunes, you are hearing a low-resolution version of what was actually recorded and mastered in the studio. ProStudioMasters offers the original studio masters — exactly as the artist, producers and sound engineers mastered them — for download, directly to you. What do I need for playback? You may need additional software / hardware to take full advantage of the higher 24-bit high-res audio formats, but any music lover that has heard 16-bit vs 24-bit will tell you it's worth it! Super One -The 1st Album. Purchase and download this album in a wide variety of formats depending on your needs. Buy the album Starting at £9.49. Super One -The 1st Album. Copy the following link to share it. You are currently listening to samples. Listen to over 70 million songs with an unlimited streaming plan. Listen to this album and more than 70 million songs with your unlimited streaming plans. 1 month free, then £14,99/ month. Lucas, Vocalist, AssociatedPerformer - Mark, Vocalist, AssociatedPerformer - Ten, Vocalist, AssociatedPerformer - Moonshine, Producer, Programming, AssociatedPerformer - Kai, Vocalist, AssociatedPerformer - Kenzie, Producer, Programming, AssociatedPerformer, ComposerLyricist - Jonatan Gusmark, ComposerLyricist - Bobii Lewis, ComposerLyricist - Adrian Mckinnon, ComposerLyricist - Taemin,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Cultural Resources Supporting Information
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WATSON RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT City of American Canyon, Napa County, California State Clearinghouse Number 2015022030 July 2018 Appendix D Cultural Resources Supporting Information D1 Cultural Resources Survey Report (Redacted) D2 Addendum to the Watson Ranch Cultural Resources Report: South Napa Junction Road Improvements D1 Cultural Resources Survey Report (Redacted) Redacted Version WATSON RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, NAPA COUNTY 4GXKUGF%WNVWTCN4GUQWTEGU5WTXG[4GRQTV 2TGRCTGFHQTVJG #RTKN %KV[QH#OGTKECP%CP[QP %QOOWPKV[&GXGNQROGPV&GRCTVOGPV Redacted Version WATSON RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, NAPA COUNTY 4GXKUGF%WNVWTCN4GUQWTEGU5WTXG[4GRQTV 2TGRCTGFHQT #RTKN %KV[QH#OGTKECP%CP[QP %QOOWPKV[&GXGNQROGPV&GRCTVOGPV 2TGRCTGFD[ $TCF$TGYUVGT/# *GKFK-QGPKI/#42# 2CWN<KOOGT$# '5#Ě%WNVWTCN4GUQWTEGU)TQWR -GCTP[5VTGGV 5WKVG 5CP(TCPEKUEQ%# YYYGUCUUQEEQO $GPF 1CMNCPF 5CP(TCPEKUEQ %COCTKNNQ 1TNCPFQ 5CPVC/QPKEC &GNTC[$GCEJ 2CUCFGPC 5CTCUQVC &GUVKP 2GVCNWOC 5GCVVNG +TXKPG 2QTVNCPF 5WPTKUG .QU#PIGNGU 5CETCOGPVQ 6CORC /KCOK 5CP&KGIQ SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Cultural Resources Group has prepared this cultural resources report for the City of American Canyon (City) Watson Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan). The Specific Plan area consists of approximately 300 acres on the northeastern edge of the City, east of Broadway (State Route 29) and north of American Canyon Road. The effort to identify cultural resources in the Specific Plan area consisted of archival research, contact with Native Americans organizations/individuals, and a surface survey. The proposed Plan is required to comply with the regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended. ESA staff conducted a records search at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System at Sonoma State University on August 8, 2013, and updated the search on April 23, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • August 19,1869
    REMINISCENCES OF “OLD BEN TAPPAN.” Farm, Garden, and Household, (From the Cincinnati Enquirer.) A lusty, rasping old tile was Benjamin Tappau—-usually styled, where he wa'known, COMH'CTF.n r.Y l’l'TXAM SIMOXTOX. •■Old Ben Tappau." once a countv judge, from which he was transferred to tiie Su- tt^-Our friends who may have communications, ob- preme Bench of Ohio, and from thence to a s< rvations, facts, or of interest, suggestions, anything seat in the United States Senate, trom the I rtaiuing to this department, are requested to comrau- icate the same to Dr. Putnam Simouton, Searsport, who same State. Numerous are the anecdotes re- will the same lor if of sufficient im- prepare publication, lated of him in all these 1 >y his portance. capacities neighbors, associates, members of the ar, and in From GOOD PICKLES-HOW TO MAKE. fellow-legislators Congress. among the host of told of him. we re- NATURAL SCIENCE. A SONG. tains: anil worse still, the fierce On the I was com- THE WILD HORSE OF THE PLAINS. good things I'h. r. are several for Spanish leaving army appointed ways practiced making duce to and the followin'.' sam- Matter. Whatever space, whatever w*e were continually attacking us. All this mandant of the swine in our This is Our readers will no doubt with in- writing print i kies, as cucumbers. tomatoes, &c., some, occupies I this to one who makes glen, village. peruse good: >ing song I ple* : can see or touch i> called matter; a word derived A of was not much to my taste, confess, nothing in truth a office, Herr Amtmann, but terest the sketch of the horse in his ae bad: sonic, The old-fashioned, pleasantness duty; military following poisonous.
    [Show full text]