Appendix D Cultural Resources Supporting Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix D Cultural Resources Supporting Information DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WATSON RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT City of American Canyon, Napa County, California State Clearinghouse Number 2015022030 July 2018 Appendix D Cultural Resources Supporting Information D1 Cultural Resources Survey Report (Redacted) D2 Addendum to the Watson Ranch Cultural Resources Report: South Napa Junction Road Improvements D1 Cultural Resources Survey Report (Redacted) Redacted Version WATSON RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, NAPA COUNTY 4GXKUGF%WNVWTCN4GUQWTEGU5WTXG[4GRQTV 2TGRCTGFHQTVJG #RTKN %KV[QH#OGTKECP%CP[QP %QOOWPKV[&GXGNQROGPV&GRCTVOGPV Redacted Version WATSON RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, NAPA COUNTY 4GXKUGF%WNVWTCN4GUQWTEGU5WTXG[4GRQTV 2TGRCTGFHQT #RTKN %KV[QH#OGTKECP%CP[QP %QOOWPKV[&GXGNQROGPV&GRCTVOGPV 2TGRCTGFD[ $TCF$TGYUVGT/# *GKFK-QGPKI/#42# 2CWN<KOOGT$# '5#Ě%WNVWTCN4GUQWTEGU)TQWR -GCTP[5VTGGV 5WKVG 5CP(TCPEKUEQ%# YYYGUCUUQEEQO $GPF 1CMNCPF 5CP(TCPEKUEQ %COCTKNNQ 1TNCPFQ 5CPVC/QPKEC &GNTC[$GCEJ 2CUCFGPC 5CTCUQVC &GUVKP 2GVCNWOC 5GCVVNG +TXKPG 2QTVNCPF 5WPTKUG .QU#PIGNGU 5CETCOGPVQ 6CORC /KCOK 5CP&KGIQ SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Cultural Resources Group has prepared this cultural resources report for the City of American Canyon (City) Watson Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan). The Specific Plan area consists of approximately 300 acres on the northeastern edge of the City, east of Broadway (State Route 29) and north of American Canyon Road. The effort to identify cultural resources in the Specific Plan area consisted of archival research, contact with Native Americans organizations/individuals, and a surface survey. The proposed Plan is required to comply with the regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended. ESA staff conducted a records search at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System at Sonoma State University on August 8, 2013, and updated the search on April 23, 2018. Previous studies resulted in the identification of five cultural resources within the records search radius, including three prehistoric archaeological sites, one isolated prehistoric artifact, and a historic-era quarry and residential area. None of these resources are located within the Plan area. ESA archaeologists Heidi Koenig, M.A., RPA and Paul Zimmer, B.A. completed a pedestrian survey of the Plan area on January 29 and 30, 2015. No prehistoric archaeological resources were identified during the surface survey. Given the environmental setting, the relative distance of most of the Plan area from the nearest perennial water source (a small tributary to American Canyon Creek), and the paucity of any nearby prehistoric archaeological sites in a similar setting, the prehistoric archaeological sensitivity of the Plan area is considered low. While unlikely, the accidental discovery of archaeological resources or human remains cannot be entirely discounted and recommendations are provided in the event of discovery during ground disturbing activities associated with the Plan. ESA architectural historian Brad Brewster, M.A. conducted a site visit to record and evaluate the historic-era buildings and structures in the Plan area on February 7, 2005, and January 29, 2015. Three historic-era architectural resources were recorded: the Standard Portland Cement Plant, the Watson Ranch complex, and the Newell Ranch complex. All three resources have been evaluated by ESA’s Secretary of the Interior-qualified architectural historian and recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources and the National Register of Historic Places, and they do not meet the definition of a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA or a historic property for the purposes of the NHPA. As no historical resources or historic properties are in the Plan area, no additional work regarding historical resources or historic properties is necessary for the proposed Plan. Watson Ranch Specific Plan iii ESA D130779 Cultural Resources Survey Report April 2018 Summary of Findings THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Specific Plan Location and Description .................................................................................... 3 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................. 5 Area of Potential Effects ........................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 Sources Consulted .................................................................................................... 13 Records Search Methods ....................................................................................................... 13 Records Search Results ......................................................................................................... 14 Native American Contact ........................................................................................................ 15 Chapter 3 Background ................................................................................................................ 17 Natural Environment ............................................................................................................... 17 Cultural History ....................................................................................................................... 18 Prehistoric Context ........................................................................................................... 18 Ethnohistorical Setting ...................................................................................................... 19 Historic Background ......................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 4 Survey Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Archaeological Resources ...................................................................................................... 25 Architectural Resources .......................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 5 Survey Results ........................................................................................................... 26 Archaeological Resources ...................................................................................................... 26 Architectural Resources .......................................................................................................... 26 Standard Portland Cement Plant ...................................................................................... 26 Watson Ranch .................................................................................................................. 29 Newell Ranch.................................................................................................................... 30 Chapter 6 Recommended Evaluation of Resources ................................................................ 31 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 Recommendations for Eligibility.............................................................................................. 31 Standard Portland Cement Company (P-28-001819) ...................................................... 31 Watson Ranch (P-28-001826) .......................................................................................... 32 Newell Ranch (P-28-001825) ........................................................................................... 33 Chapter 7 Summary and Recommendations ............................................................................ 34 Archaeological Resources ...................................................................................................... 34 Architectural Resources .......................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 8 References .................................................................................................................. 36 Appendices Appendix A Native American Correspondence Appendix B Department of Parks and Recreation Forms Watson Ranch Specific Plan v ESA D130779 Cultural Resources Survey Report April 2018 Table of Contents Page Figures Figure 1 Specific Plan Area Location.................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Specific Plan Area .................................................................................................. 4 Figure 3a Off-site Improvements .......................................................................................... 10 Figure 3b Off-site Improvements .......................................................................................... 11 Figure 3c Off-site Improvements .......................................................................................... 12 Figure 4. Cultural Resources in Plan Area - Confidential Figure ......................................... 16 Figure 5 Standard Portland Cement Company, General View of Plant from Southeast .... 22 Figure 6 Final Tube Mills
Recommended publications
  • Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA
    Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA Prepared for City of Benicia Department of Public Works & Community Development Prepared by page & turnbull, inc. 1000 Sansome Street, Ste. 200, San Francisco CA 94111 415.362.5154 / www.page-turnbull.com Benicia Historic Context Statement FOREWORD “Benicia is a very pretty place; the situation is well chosen, the land gradually sloping back from the water, with ample space for the spread of the town. The anchorage is excellent, vessels of the largest size being able to tie so near shore as to land goods without lightering. The back country, including the Napa and Sonoma Valleys, is one of the finest agriculture districts in California. Notwithstanding these advantages, Benicia must always remain inferior in commercial advantages, both to San Francisco and Sacramento City.”1 So wrote Bayard Taylor in 1850, less than three years after Benicia’s founding, and another three years before the city would—at least briefly—serve as the capital of California. In the century that followed, Taylor’s assessment was echoed by many authors—that although Benicia had all the ingredients for a great metropolis, it was destined to remain in the shadow of others. Yet these assessments only tell a half truth. While Benicia never became the great commercial center envisioned by its founders, its role in Northern California history is nevertheless one that far outstrips the scale of its geography or the number of its citizens. Benicia gave rise to the first large industrial works in California, hosted the largest train ferries ever constructed, and housed the West Coast’s primary ordnance facility for over 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of an Industry: the Role of the Bracero Program in the Growth of Viticulture in Sonoma and Napa Counties
    THE HEART OF AN INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF THE BRACERO PROGRAM IN THE GROWTH OF VITICULTURE IN SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES by Zachary A. Lawrence A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Copyright 2005 By Zachary A. Lawrence ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTER’S THESIS I grant permission for the reproduction of parts of this thesis without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorbs the cost and provide proper acknowledgement of authorship. Permission to reproduce this thesis in its entirety must be obtained from me. iii THE HEART OF AN INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF THE BRACERO PROGRAM IN THE GROWTH OF VITICULTURE IN SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES Thesis by Zachary A. Lawrence ABSTRACT This study examines the role of the Bracero Program in the growth of Sonoma and Napa County viticulture in an attempt to understand how important bracero labor was to the industry. While most histories of the Bracero Program are nationwide or statewide in scope, this study explores the regional complexities of how and why the program was used in Sonoma and Napa Counties, how both the growers and laborers in the region felt about it, and how this was different from and similar to other regions. Government documents provided the statistics necessary to determine the demographic changes in the region due to the Bracero Program. Important primary source material that provided the human side of the story includes a number of oral history interviews I conducted, the collection of Wine Industry Oral Histories, and various regional newspaper articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Creek Weed Management Project ISMND
    NAPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT Pope Creek Weed Management Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2019 For accessibility assistance with this document, please contact the Napa County Resource Conservation District (NCRCD) at 707-252-4189, fax to 707-252-4219, or through the California Relay Service by dialing 711. This document includes complex figures and tables that may be difficult to interpret using an assistive device such as a screen reader. NAPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT Pope Creek Weed Management Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for: Napa County Resource Conservation District 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 500B Napa, California 94559 Prepared by: Horizon Water and Environment, LLC 266 Grand Avenue, Suite 210 Oakland, California 94610 Contact: Ken Schwarz (510) 986-1851 December 2019 Horizon Water and Environment. 2019. Pope Creek Weed Management Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. December. (HWE 18.032) Oakland, CA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Location ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Intent and Scope of this Document ............................................................... 1-3 1.4 Organization of this Document .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological, Geomorphic, And
    ECOLOGICAL, GEOMORPHIC, AND LAND USE HISTORY OF THE CARNEROS CREEK WATERSHED: A COMPONENT OF THE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CARNEROS CREEK WATERSHED, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR STEWARDSHIP SUPPORT AND WATERSHED ASSESSMENT IN THE NAPA RIVER WATERSHED: A CALFED PROJECT CALFED CONTRACT NO. 4600001703 NAPA COUNTY RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT BY Robin Grossinger Chuck Striplen Elise Brewster Lester McKee December 2003: Rev. February 2004 Robin Grossinger, Chuck Striplen, and Lester McKee: San Francisco Estuary Institute Elise Brewster: Brewster Design Arts This report should be cited as: Grossinger, R., C. Striplen, E. Brewster, and L. McKee, 2004. Ecological, Geomorphic, and Land Use History of Carneros Creek Watershed: A component of the watershed management plan for the Carneros Creek watershed, Napa County, California. A Technical Report of the Regional Watershed Program, SFEI Contribution 70, San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland CA. 48 pp. San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 Carneros Creek Historical Ecology Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 Methods.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Benicia City Cemetery
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB Control No. 1024-0018 expiration date 03/31/2022 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Benicia City Cemetery DRAFT Other names/site number: Benicia Pioneer Cemetery; Bridgeview Heights Cemetery; Cemetery Hill Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) 2. Location Street & number: Bounded by Riverhill Drive (to the east), Riverview Terrace (to the north), Shirley Drive (to the west), and Incline Place (to the south). City or town: Benicia City State: CA County: Solano (095) Not For Publication: N/A Vicinity: N/A 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national ___statewide ___local Applicable National Register Criteria: ___A ___B ___C ___D Sections 1-6 page 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB Control No.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.E Noise Introduction This Section Summarizes Information on the Noise Environment in the St
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.E Noise Introduction This section summarizes information on the noise environment in the St. Helena planning area and provides an evaluation of the noise-related effects of the proposed General Plan Update. The analysis considers existing and projected noise along major roadways, in addition to other noise sources in the area. Mitigation measures are recommended that address General Plan Update policies and implementing actions. The noise element of a city’s general plan is a comprehensive approach for including noise control in the planning process. It is a tool for achieving and maintaining environmental noise levels that are compatible with specific land use types. The Public Health, Safety and Noise Element of the proposed General Plan Update identifies noise-sensitive land uses and noise sources, defines areas of noise impact, and establishes goals, policies, and implementing actions to protect people from excessive noise and vibration. Setting Background Information on Noise Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable Noise is defined as unwanted because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could sound. be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F: Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment
    City of Calistoga – Enchanted Resorts Project Draft EIR Appendix F: Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\3808\38080001\3 - Draft EIR\38080001_Sec99-00 Appendix Dividers.doc Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment Enchanted Resorts Project City of Calistoga, Napa, California Calistoga, California, USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle Map Township 8 North, Range 6 West and Township 8 North, Range 7 West of the Rancho Carne Humana Land Grant 88-acre Study Area Prepared for: City of Calistoga Planning and Building Department 1232 Washington Street Calistoga, CA 94515 707.942.2827 Attn: Erik Lundquist, Senior Planner Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates Bishop Ranch 3 2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 460 San Ramon, CA 94583 925.830.2733 Author/Contact: Carrie D. Wills, Senior Project Archaeologist Fieldwork Conducted By: Carrie D. Wills Fieldwork Conducted On: September 8 and 21, 2010 Report Date: November 5, 2010 Keywords: Calistoga, California, USGS topographic quadrangle map, Napa River City of Calistoga - Enchanted Resorts Project Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction.........................................................................................................3 1.1 - Project Location .................................................................................................. 3 1.2 - Project Description.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy-Five Years in California; a History of Events and Life in California
    Seventy-five years in California; a history of events and life in California THE first habitation in Yerba Buena, a tent dwelling erected in 1835 by Capt. Wm. A. Richardson, at the corner of Clay and Dupont streets, occupied the site of No. 18 on the view map. In July, 1836, Jacob Primer Leese built the first house, just south of Richardson's location. The residence and place of business of William Heath Davis, author of “Seventy-five Years in California,” is marked No. 7. Yerba Buena Cove appears in its natural condition with the waters of the Bay nearly touching Montgomery Street. The Laguna Salada, or Saltwater Lagoon, now almost forgotten, is shown where Montgomery and Jackson streets cross. It was over this tidal inlet that William S. Hinckley, when Alcade, built the first bridge in California in 1844. This rare view of the San Francisco of 1846-7 fittingly illustrates the early days of the city which William Heath Davis describes. To the north of the home of Wm. A. Leidesdorff—No. 11—Wm. Heath Davis built the first brick building of more than one story in California in 1849, leasing it to the U. S. Treasury for a custom house. The flagpole upon which Capt. John B. Montgomery raised the American flag July 9, 1846, was removed from the Plaza in 1850 and re-erected in front of the Davis building, where it was destroyed by the fire of May 4, 1851. California Street was laid out by Jasper o'Farrell, who enlarged the survey of the town made by Jean Jacques Vioget in 1839.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources (Includes Historical and Archaeological Resources )
    NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT . CHAPTER 14 CULTURAL RESOURCES (INCLUDES HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ) PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to provide a CHRONOLOGY OF UPDATES summary of known cultural resources in Napa County. This chapter is based on the review of NOVEMBER 30, 2005—VERSION 1 numerous existing background reports and publications that contain information on prehistoric, historic, scientific, and cultural resources in Napa County. This document and the data assembled provide broad tools for site and regional planning as well as the basis for future planning documents relating to the protection and management of the County’s rich cultural resources. HISTORIC WINE CAVE, CONSTRUCTED IN 1882 NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES FIGURES TABLE OF CONTENTS On page INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................14-1 14-1 Ethnographic Territories of the Wappo, Patwin and Surrounding Tribes ..............................14-9 Purpose ................................................................................................................................14-1 Specialized Terms Used.......................................................................................................14-1 MAPS POLICY CONSIDERATIONS..............................................................................................................14-1 Federal Policies ....................................................................................................................14-1
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] Map of the City of Benicia Founded By Mariano G. Vallejo, Thomas O. Larking & Robert Semple 1847 Surveyed & Drawn By Benjamin Barlow City & County Surveyor Stock#: 47405 Map Maker: Britton & Rey Date: 1850 circa Place: San Francisco Color: Uncolored Condition: VG Size: 33 x 22 inches Price: SOLD Description: One of California's Early State Capitals and the First California City to Be Incorporated Following Statehood Fine early plan of the city on Benicia on the Carquinez Strait, published by Benjamin Barlow in San Francisco. The map shows the town at about the time is was the Capital of the State of California. This is one of two Barlow maps of Benicia, with a different map published in New York in 1851. The two maps are quite similar in the layout of the town, although this San Francisco published edition includes further land reclamation, creating south street on the waterfront, where there the island is shown. History of Benicia The Carquinez Strait was first visited by Europeans in the Spring of 1772, when Captain Pedro Fages and Father Juan Crespi arrived by foot at the southern end of the strait, as part of the first reconnaissance of San Francisco Bay. In 1839, the 13,000 acre Rancho Tolenas in the Suisun Valley was granted to Jose Francisco Armijo. Victor Castro-the son of Francisco Castro and son-in-law of Ygnacio Martinez-was granted Mare Island in 1841.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Cultural Resources
    3. Affected Environment / Environmental Setting, Environmental Consequences / Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.12 Cultural Resources This section describes the existing cultural resources in the action area, the applicable regulations at the federal, state, and local levels, and the potential impacts to cultural resources from the North Bay Water Recycling Program (NBWRP). Information for the section was adapted from the Cultural Resources Survey Report completed for the NBWRA (ESA, 2008). The Impacts and Mitigation Measures section defines significance criteria used for the impact assessment and presents a discussion of potential project-related impacts. Determination of significance of impacts in this EIR/EIS apply only to CEQA, not to NEPA. 3.12.1 Affected Environment/Setting Area of Potential Effects The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the NBWRP is defined as “the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist” (36 CFR 800.16[b]). In consultation with the Bureau of Reclamation, an archaeological APE and an architectural/structural APE was determined for the NBWRP (Welch, 2008). Depending upon the project components, the archaeological APE has been determined as the area of direct impact for the NBWRP. For example, trenching for installing the recycled water pipelines would require a maximum width of three feet and a vertical depth of up to six feet; therefore the vertical APE would be six feet. For the NBWRP, an APE of 50-foot wide corridor (25-foot radius from centerline) would be assumed in undeveloped areas to accommodate for areas for staging and spoils.
    [Show full text]