Proceedings of SDAS 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of SDAS 2000 Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science Volume 79 2000 Published by the South Dakota Academy of Science Academy Founded November 22, 1915 Editor Kenneth F. Higgins Terri Symens, Wildlife & Fisheries, SDSU provided secretarial assistance Tom Holmlund, Graphic Designer TABLE OF CONTENTS Consolidated Minutes of the Eighty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the South Dakota Academy of Science...........................................................................1 Presidential Address: Understanding Change. Lenore Koczon..........................5 Complete Senior Research Papers presented at The 85th Annual Meeting of the South Dakota Academy of Science Angler Opinions Regarding Fishing Success and Crappie Regulations in a Small South Dakota Impoundment. Timothy J. Bister, Bradley M. Baker and David W. Willis........................................................11 Biological Control of Canada Thistle (Cirsium Arvense) in South Dakota. Z. Liu, S.A. Clay and M. Brinkman...............................................21 Identification of ESTs that are possibly related to the FHB-resistance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar Sumai 3. D.H. Xing, Y. Yen and J.C. Rudd ....................................................................................35 An Ichthyosaur Bone From the Jurassic of South Dakota. David C. Parris and Barbara Smith Grandstaff............................................41 A Bison Skull from Lyman County, South Dakota. B.S. Grandstaff, D.C. Parris and J.E. Martin............................................................................45 Using the Ocean Optics R-2000 Raman Spectrometer in the Undergraduate Laboratory. Deanna L. Donohoue, Gary W. Earl and Arlen Viste..............................................................................................63 13C NMR Spectra and Quantum Chemistry Calculations for Benzonitrile and 4-Aminobenzonitrile. Steven R. Moeckly, Gary W. Earl and Arlen Viste .......................................................................71 Synthesis and Analysis of Quaternary Compounds Containing Phosphate and Borate Anions. David Stone and Gary Earl .....................75 The Synthesis of Methyl Carbonate Quats and Their Anion Conversions. Drew J. Paulson and Gary W. Earl ......................................79 Molecular Modeling of Selected Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistant Enzymes. Kari Lunder, Gary W. Earl and Arlen Viste ...............................83 Amino Acid Concentration of Soybean With Protein Variation in Different Environments. R.A. Scott and K.D. Kephart...............................89 Misadventures in Soybean Transformation: Particle Bombardment vs. Agrobacterium and Cotyledonary Nodes. S.A. Hansen and C.D. Carter .....................................................................................................97 Summer Habitat Associations of Rare Fishes in South Dakota Tributaries to the Minnesota River. Douglas J. Dieterman and Charles R. Berry...........................................................................................103 Abstracts of Senior Research Papers presented at The 85th Annual Meeting of the South Dakota Academy of Science Use of Shelterbelts as Breeding Habitat by Birds in Eastern South Dakota. Dale L. Droge and Jeffrey S. Palmer ..........................................113 Investigating Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys Coriacea) Egg Laying and Egg Survival. Valerie E. Wilson and Donna Hazelwood .................115 Water Quality and Phytoplankton Dynamics of the Ottertail Power Plant Cooling Pond, Milbank, SD. Amy L. Gronke and Nels H. Troelstrup, Jr. .................................................................................117 Characterization of a Rural Stream to Define Critical Reaches Influenced by Non-Point Source Pollution. A.M. Larson and N.H. Troelstrup, Jr. ......................................................................................119 Distribution, Breeding Patterns, and Developmental Physiology of Some South Dakota Terrestrial Isopods. J. Likness and L.G. Johnson ................................................................................................121 Invertebrate Community Characteristics in Relation to Ecoregion, Shoreline Management and Habitat in Eastern South Dakota Lakes. C.W. Braskamp and N.H. Troelstrup Jr.........................................123 Impacts of Land Use on Aquatic Invertebrate Abundances and Their Correlation to Nutrient Concentrations in Prairie Pothole Wetlands. Brandon Jahnke and Diane Rickerl.........................................125 Detecting Indicators of Poor Absorption of Colostral Antibody in South Dakota Beef Calves. Amanda K. Weaver, William B. Epperson, Timothy A. Wittig, Richard J. Pruitt, Donald M. Marshall, and Alan R. Bender..................................................127 Losses Associated with Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Yearling, Stocker, Grass Calves. Keith Mertz, Bill Epperson, and Mike Hildreth...............................................................................................129 Effects of Melanocortins (MSH) and Agouti Protein on Melanogenesis in B16 Melanoma Cells. Partha Ramasastry and Nels H. Granholm .......................................................................................131 Measurement of Estrone and Progesterone in Mouse Serum Using Enzyme Linked Immunoassays. Maureen Diggins, Julia Spiry and Nels H. Granholm................................................................................133 Comparison of Native and Introduced Plants in Selected Fields and Roadsides in Tall Grass Prairie in Ottertail County, MN. Donna Hazelwood ......................................................................................135 Seed Biology of Honey Locust in the Northern Great Plains. Soja Sekharan, Arvid Boe, Paul Johnson and Shannon Puckett ..............137 Evaluating Site-Specific Post Emergence Weed Control Strategies. C.M. Cole, S.A. Clay, D.E. Clay, K.J. Dalsted, C.L. Reese and C.G. Carlson.................................................................................................139 Using Spectral Reflectance and Remote Sensing to Compare Crops and Weeds. C. Poppen, S.A. Clay, D. Clay, K. Dalsted, C.G. Carlson, and M.M. Ellsbury ................................................................141 Determining Conditions for Growth and Maintenance of Ustilago Maydis Under Laboratory Conditions. Kazmann J. Foster and Donna Hazelwood ......................................................................................143 Evaluating Yield Differences of Phytopthora Resistant and Non-Resistant Soybean Varieties by Soil Electro-Conductivity Zones. C.L. Reese, D.E. Clay and C.G. Carlson .......................................145 The Influence of Habitat on Species Richness and Abundance of Wetland Birds at Ordway Prairie, South Dakota. Mary C. Miller and Lester D. Flake ............................................................147 Chromosome Arm Dosage Effects on the Expression of the High Molecular Weight Glutenin Proteins of Wheat. Jill D. Kruse, Jesse D. Munkvold, Erin E. Lee, Elizabeth A. Hamann, Ellen J. Hamann, and Michael K. Wanous.................................................149 Carbon Isotope Discrimination as a Marker for Heat-Tolerance in Wheat. Kara J. Fuehrer, Steven R. Moeckly, Michael E. Chapman, Michael K. Wanous and Patrick F. Byrne ..................................................151 A Mathematical Model of Two Competing Species in a Simple Chemostat When the Growth Function of Each Species is of Continued Fraction Form. Melissa A. Wittgenstein and A.S. Elkhader ...............................................................................................153 EDB Contaminant Plume at Nemo, South Dakota. Perry H. Rahn and Christopher S. Johnson ...............................................................................155 Direct Electrochemical Oxidation of Amino Acids at Diamond Thin-Film Electrodes. Eric Hammond, Miles Koppang and Greg M. Swain.............................................................................................157 Experiences in Creating an Internet Chemistry Course and Students’ Attitudes Towards the Course. Dwayne W. Rehfeld ...............................159 Working with Dihydrogenatedtallow Dimethyl Ammonium Methylcarbonate. Jenny Bjergaard and Dr. Gary Earl .............................161 Synthesis of Dimethyl Dihydrogenatedtallow Ammonium Compounds Exhibiting Aromatic Anions. Steven R. Moeckly and Gary W. Earl .......163 Synthesis of a Biodegradable Surfactant from Starch. Levi M. Stanley and Gary W. Earl.........................................................................................165 Synthesis of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds from 2-Aminoglucose. John D. Gilbertson and Gary Earl ...............................167 Virtual Geology Field Trips of South Dakota. Howard J. Woodard and Mike Hildreth .......................................................................................169 Isolation, Cloning, and Sequencing of the Porcine Agouti-Related Protein Gene (agrp). Michael Halverson, Nels Granholm, Carl Westby and Donald Marshall..............................................................171 Biosystematic Evaluation of South Dakota Populations of Beckwith’s Clover Using RAPDs. Jeffrey D. Noll, Gary E. Larson and Melvin R. Duvall..........................................................................................173 Native Plants of the Northern Great Plains: Ethylene Induction of Asteraceae Seed Germination. April Stahnke
Recommended publications
  • Distribution and Dispersal of Urophora Cardui (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Finland in 1985-1991
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.1.1992 Distribution and dispersal of Urophora cardui (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Finland in 1985-1991 Antti Jansson Jansson, A. 1992: Distribution and dispersal of Urophora cardui (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Finland in 1985- 1991. - Entomol. Fennica 2:211- 216. Urophora cardui (Linnaeus) was reported for the first time from Finland in 1981 , from the city of Helsinki. During the years 1985- 1991 the distribution and dispersal of the species was monitored by searching for galls which the fly larvae cause on stems of the thistle Cirsium arvense. In 1986 gall s were ob­ served at a distance of 18- 36 km from the center of Helsinki, and by 1991 the distance had increased to 37-55 km along the main roads. Annual dispersal of the fly was found to correlate strongly with the warmth of summers: after a cold summer the area occupied by the fly actually decreased, but in a warm summer new galls were fo und up to 16 km further from city center than the year before. Antti Jansson, Zoological Museum, P. Rautatiekatu 13, SF-00100 Helsinki, Finland 1. Introduction grates, and air enters the chamber; the pupal stage lasts about 25 days. Under natural condi­ Urophora cardui (Linnaeus) is a univoltine fly tions developmental time is obviously some­ which is a highly specialized gall-maker in stems what different depending on prevailing tem­ of the creeping thistle, Cirsium arvense (Lin­ peratures. naeus) Scopoli. Under laboratory conditions the In Central Europe maturation of the galls takes life cycle of the fly is as follows (Lalonde & some 60- 70 days, and because the flies emerge Shorthouse 1984 ): The female lays up to 11 eggs in early to mid June (Zwolfer 1979, Schlumprecht per oviposition among the immature leaves of 1989), the galls are mature from mid August on.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Management Practice for Canada Thistle Matthew P
    Weeding Out a Solution: Best Management Practice for Canada Thistle Matthew P. Stasica, Environmental Studies Senior Thesis October 2009 Collegeville, Minnesota Control methods mentioned in this paper are only examples. They have not been tested unless stated. It is advised that if you are to assimilate any of the control methods discussed in this thesis that you better know what you are doing or understand if the treatment is right for your infestation problem. Also, there are a plethora of other control methods for managing Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). The methods in this thesis should not be regarded as implying that other methods as inferior. Stasica 1 Weeding Out a Solution: Best Management Practice for Canada Thistle Table of Contents: Page Number Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....3 Biology……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………..5 Laws and Regulation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8 Interview: County Agricultural Inspector- Greg Senst…………………………………………………….……………..8 Mechanical Control Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………….………..10 Physical Control Methods……………………………...……………………………………………………………………………13 -Hand Pulling…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..13 -Grazing……………………………………………………………………………………………..………… .……....13 -Fire…………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..……...15 Chemical Control Methods………………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Biological Control Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………..…………….18 Integrated Pest Management……………………………………………………………………………………….…………….20
    [Show full text]
  • Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää
    20 © Sahlbergia Vol. 12: 20–32, 2007 Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää Winqvist, K. & Kahanpää, J. 2007: Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Diptera: Brachycera). — Sahlbergia 12:20-32, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237-3273. Another part of the updated checklist of Finnish flies is presented. This part covers the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, Piophilidae, Platystomatidae, Tephritidae, Ulididae, Coelopidae, Dryomyzidae, Heterocheilidae, Phaeomyii- dae, Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae. Eight species are recorded from Finland for the first time. The following ten species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the Finnish checklist: Chaetolonchaea das- yops (Meigen, 1826), Earomyia crystallophila (Becker, 1895), Lonchaea hirti- ceps Zetterstedt, 1837, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen, 1826, Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda, 1924), Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew, 1869), Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén, 1814), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- demann, 1830) and Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856). The Finnish records of Lonchaeidae: Lonchaea bruggeri Morge, Lonchaea contigua Collin, Lonchaea difficilis Hackman and Piophilidae: Allopiophila dudai (Frey) are considered dubious. The total number of species of Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea found from Finland is now 262. Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Email: [email protected] Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. Email: kahanpaa@iki.fi Introduction new millennium there was no concentrated The last complete checklist of Finnish Dipte- Finnish effort to study just these particular ra was published in Hackman (1980a, 1980b). groups. Consequently, before our work the Recent checklists of Finnish species have level of knowledge on Finnish fauna in these been published for ‘lower Brachycera’ i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirsium Arvense (L.) Scop
    NEW YORK NON -NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Scientific name: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (C. setosum, C. incanum, Carduus arvensis, Serratula arvensis & all varieties of C. arvense) USDA Plants Code: CIAR4 Common names: Creeping thistle, Californian thistle, Canada thistle, field thistle Native distribution: Eurasia Date assessed: April 28, 2009 Assessors: Gerry Moore Reviewers: LIISMA SRC Date Approved: May 13, 2009 Form version date: 3 March 2009 New York Invasiveness Rank: High (Relative Maximum Score 70.00-80.00) Distribution and Invasiveness Rank ( Obtain from PRISM invasiveness ranking form ) PRISM Status of this species in each PRISM: Current Distribution Invasiveness Rank 1 Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Not Assessed 2 Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Not Assessed 3 Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Not Assessed 4 Finger Lakes Not Assessed Not Assessed 5 Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Widespread High 6 Lower Hudson Not Assessed Not Assessed 7 Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Not Assessed 8 Western New York Not Assessed Not Assessed Invasiveness Ranking Summary Total (Total Answered*) Total (see details under appropriate sub-section) Possible 1 Ecological impact 40 ( 40 ) 20 2 Biological characteristic and dispersal ability 25 ( 25 ) 21 3 Ecological amplitude and distribution 25 ( 25 ) 21 4 Difficulty of control 10 ( 10 ) 9 Outcome score 100 ( 100 )b 71 a † Relative maximum score 71.00 § New York Invasiveness Rank High (Relative Maximum Score 70.00-80.00) * For questions answered “unknown” do not include point value in “Total Answered Points Possible.” If “Total Answered Points Possible” is less than 70.00 points, then the overall invasive rank should be listed as “Unknown.” †Calculated as 100(a/b) to two decimal places.
    [Show full text]
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Attack of Urophora Quadrifasciata (Meig.) (Diiptera: Tephritidae) a Biological Control Agent for Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Maculosa Lamarck) and Diffuse Knapweed (C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Valparaiso University The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 36 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2003 Numbers Article 4 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2003 April 2003 Attack of Urophora Quadrifasciata (Meig.) (Diiptera: Tephritidae) A Biological Control Agent for Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Maculosa Lamarck) and Diffuse Knapweed (C. Diffusa Lamarck) (Asteraceae) by a Parasitoid, Pteromalus Sp. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) in Michigan Ronald F. Lang United States Department of Agriculture Jane Winkler Michigan Department of Agriculture Richard W. Hansen United States Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Lang, Ronald F.; Winkler, Jane; and Hansen, Richard W. 2003. "Attack of Urophora Quadrifasciata (Meig.) (Diiptera: Tephritidae) A Biological Control Agent for Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Maculosa Lamarck) and Diffuse Knapweed (C. Diffusa Lamarck) (Asteraceae) by a Parasitoid, Pteromalus Sp. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) in Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 36 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol36/iss1/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Lang et al.: Attack of <i>Urophora Quadrifasciata</i> (Meig.) (Diiptera: Tephr 16 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 36, Nos. 1 & 2 ATTACK OF UROPHORA QUADRIFASCIATA (MEIG.) (DIIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT FOR SPOTTED KNAPWEED (CENTAUREA MACULOSA LAMARCK) AND DIFFUSE KNAPWEED (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Question 1 – Philosophy of Science – Open Book (Hard Copies Only); Laptop Acceptable; No Internet
    Question 1 – Philosophy of Science – Open book (hard copies only); laptop acceptable; no internet Using the scientific method as the basis for your discussion, discuss the basis of the scientific philosophy first proposed by Karl Popper. Explain how this changed the way that we have practiced science over the last 50 years. Is the approach that Popper proposed applicable in the field of systematics/taxonomy? Why/why not? Provide examples. Are there other ways to seek understanding and explanation? My Answer Karl Popper’s view on the philosophy of science, commonly referred to as Falsificationism, revolutionized the way in which scientists approached their work. Popper argued that scientific theories can only be shown to be false using empirical data, instead of the previous notion that empirical data served to confirm or prove a theory. The scientific method is generally regarded as 4 general steps: 1) make an observation of a phenomenon, 2) create a hypothesis that predicts or explains the observation, 3) gather empirical data through experimentation that tests the hypothesis, and 4) assess how the data relates to the hypothesis. Prior to Popper, scientists would seek to confirm their hypotheses, and so would assess their collected data on whether it supported the hypothesis they proposed. If it did, they would move on to other work having shown their idea was correct. Popper however, argued that confirmation in science is not possible, and that only through a series of falsifiable hypotheses can we begin to understand the truth. This required the development of the null hypothesis, which allows one of two possible options to be falsified.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. Biocontrol Arthropods: New Denizens of Canada's
    291 Chapter 12 Biocontrol Arthropods: New Denizens of Canada’s Grassland Agroecosystems Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate and Héctor Cárcamo Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre 5403 - 1 Avenue South, P.O. Box 3000 Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1 Abstract. Canada’s grassland ecosystems have undergone major changes since the arrival of European agriculture, ranging from near-complete replacement of native biodiversity with annual crops to the effects of overgrazing by cattle on remnant native grasslands. The majority of the “agroecosystems” that have replaced the historical native grasslands now encompass completely new associations of plants and arthropods in what is typically a mix of introduced and native species. Some of these species are pests of crops and pastures and were accidentally introduced. Other species are natural enemies of these pests and were deliberately introduced as classical biological control (biocontrol) agents to control these pests. To control weeds, 76 arthropod species have been released against 24 target species in Canada since 1951, all of which also have been released in western Canada. Of these released species, 53 (70%) have become established, with 18 estimated to be reducing target weed populations. The biocontrol programs for leafy spurge in the prairie provinces and knapweeds in British Columbia have been the largest, each responsible for the establishment of 10 new arthropod species on rangelands. This chapter summarizes the ecological highlights of these programs and those for miscellaneous weeds. Compared with weed biocontrol on rangelands, classical biocontrol of arthropod crop pests by using arthropods lags far behind, mostly because of a preference to manage crop pests with chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Canada Thistle (Cirsium Arvense) in South Dakota Z
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science Faculty Department of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Publications Science 2000 Biological control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in South Dakota Z. Liu South Dakota State University S. A. Clay South Dakota State University M. Brinkman South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/plant_faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Liu, Z.; Clay, S. A.; and Brinkman, M., "Biological control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in South Dakota" (2000). Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science Faculty Publications. 197. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/plant_faculty_pubs/197 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science,Vol. 79 (2000) 21 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CANADA THISTLE (CIRSIUM ARVENSE) IN SOUTH DAKOTA Z. Liu, S.A. Clay and M. Brinkman Plant Science Department South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007 ABSTRACT Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Management Plan Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge Turnbull National Tfildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Habitat Management Plan Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge Turnbull National TfildLife Refuge Habi tat lvlanagement PIan October 1999 Preppred bY U. S . Fish and Tüild1ife Service Turr¡bull NWR 26OLO South Smith Road Cheney, WA 99004 ", Turnbutrl National WildHfe R.efuge HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL u. s. FISH AND WTLDLTFE SERVICE, REGION I PREPARED BY: /o- 2L- 91 Michael Rule Date Wildlife Biologist SUBMITTED BY: Ò Z Nancy Curry Date Refllge Manager CON rr/zr/77 Don Voros Dat6 Refuge Supervisor, Columbia Basin Ecoregion Bill Date Geographic Assistant Regional Director Coltrmbia Basin ø-lqlvÞ Date stant Regional Director Reñrges ancl Wildlife APPROVE; Aíne Badgley / ry Regional Director, Region 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction.................................................1 A. Area/Location...........................................1 B. Climate.................................................1 C. Environment.............................................1 D. History.................................................3 E. Mission and Direction...................................4 II. Resource problems and challenges............................7 A. Regional Scale..........................................7 B. On Refuge Challenges....................................8 1. Water quantity.....................................8 2. Ponderosa Pine Forest..............................8 3. Aspen/Deciduous shrub Riparian Zones...............9 4. Wet meadows and seasonal wetlands..................9 III. Meeting the Challenge....................................11
    [Show full text]