DOCSLIB.ORG

The Corruption Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE WHITE HOUSE AND BIG-TECH RACKETEERING CASE Damages Claim And Supporting Validation Provided To The U.S. Government Draft 2.6 ( In on-going edit – Make sure you have the latest revision) Provided to The U.S. Congress, DOJ, FBI, FTC, SEC and related parties as a demand for payment. Copies of this report are filed with the National Archives, each IG office and in multiple on-line transparency repositories in order to prevent further cover-ups. http://www.majestic111.com 1 Table of Contents THE WHITE HOUSE AND BIG-TECH RACKETEERING CASE........................................................1 Damages Claim And Supporting Validation Provided To The U.S. Government.....................................1 Overview....................................................................................................................................................4 The Blockade of Plaintiffs' Legal Rights And The Blockade of Their Legal Representation...................6 Plaintiffs' Demand State-Funded Legal Representation........................................................................7 Agencies And Authorities Previously Contacted.......................................................................................9 How Government Agencies Were Used As Reprisal Weapons Against Plaintiffs’..................................18 Damages And Harms List........................................................................................................................22 Relief Options Demanded...................................................................................................................24 Damages Amount Comparatives and Legal Precedents Validations........................................................25 Example # 277-A: Investigation Background Data From One Of The Plaintiffs’ Experiences..............27 Objectives:...........................................................................................................................................27 Key Points:..........................................................................................................................................27 Expanded Points:.................................................................................................................................28 Facts about Plaintiffs'..........................................................................................................................30 Facts about Plaintiffs' Government Applications................................................................................34 Recent Results Of Federal And Private Investigations...........................................................................57 The Scams At The Secretary Of Energy’s Office.....................................................................................58 Letter To The FBI:...............................................................................................................................63 Where Is The Proof?............................................................................................................................64 State Sponsored Attacks On Plaintiffs'.....................................................................................................71 Attack Notes:.......................................................................................................................................92 State Sponsored Revenge And Reprisal Programs Are Operated By Public Officials........................93 Congressional Investigation Staff Notes.............................................................................................96 Reference Bibliography Proving The Existence Of The Asserted Systemized Corruption.....................97 APPENDIX............................................................................................................................................353 Letter To The Inspector General........................................................................................................356 The Bribes Are Being Paid With Covert Stock Market Assets!........................................................375 What are the bad things about the Department of Energy's Elon Musk?..........................................383 Witness Statement # 12121:..............................................................................................................396 The Silicon Valley Tech Mobster Cartel............................................................................................398 The Corruption At Google.................................................................................................................400 Witness Statement #36789................................................................................................................404 Victim Report #14268.......................................................................................................................405 Points Proven In The Evidence.........................................................................................................415 Witness Statement #47893................................................................................................................420 The Sex Cult And Sex Trafficking Network Among The Perps.......................................................422 Witness Statement #567921..............................................................................................................428 What Do The Plaintiffs' Want?..........................................................................................................429 Witness Statement #126745..............................................................................................................441 The Silicon Valley Tech Cartel That Runs The White House Is A Racketeering Crime Mob:.........444 2 How The Silicon Valley Cartel Tech Stock Scams Work:.................................................................468 The Dirt On Perpetrator Elon Musk.......................................................................................................473 The Crony Capitalism That Powers The U. S. Dept Of Energy........................................................483 The Corruption Cartel, Based Out Of San Francisco City Hall.............................................................485 The Key Perpetrators.............................................................................................................................488 Taking These Political Crooks Down................................................................................................495 Additional Proof Of These Assertions...............................................................................................496 3 Overview Compensation is demanded from the U.S. Government and the California State Government, by Plaintiffs', for damages, monies owed, witness fees, legal expenses, whistle-blower fees, informant fees and with-held benefits monies. Additionally, Plaintiffs' submitted invoices to FBI, GAO, SEC, and other agencies that Plaintiffs' have provided witness and investigation services to. This case involves the illicit sale and trading of stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other securities; quid pro quo political briBery; election manipulation; monopoly and anti-trust law violation; bodily harm and other criminal matters applicable to every law enforcement and regulatory agency. No agency may refuse, or seek to re-direct, this case, to another agency, because this case falls within the purview of every law enforcement and regulatory agency in the USA. This case also falls within the purview of multi-national enforcement under Interpol, FinCEN, EU, etc. To reiterate: this is not a single-agency matter. No agency has the right to seek to shove this case off to another agency or cover- up this matter at the expense of citizen Constitutional and human rights. This case involves different organizations who are in contest to control the United States government and the financial and power benefits therefrom. This case involves the control of the White House and the existence, or termination, of the power in the Oval Office and international corrupt mining deals worth trillions of dollars. Plaintiffs’ witnessed an organized criminal enterprise which affected government Treasury funds. The crime scheme involved: stock market manipulation, corrupt international mining deals and media company power manipulations. When Plaintiffs’ reported the crime, millions of dollars of state- sponsored reprisal attacks ( enumerated in detail below) were launched against Plaintiffs’ in vendetta. Related cases shed illuminate the depths of criminality and the scope of crimes and illicit deeds by the colluding perpetrators and their crime culture: In federal Case No. 1:20-cv-03010 – you see proof that perpetrator Google is monopoly and runs competitor attacks. In Case No. 11-CV-2509 -https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/koh-lucy-h-lhk/in- re-high-tech-employee-antitrust-litigation/ - you see proof that the Silicon Valley Cartel colludes to harm others. In Task Force Case No. 20-xyz2020a - http://www.majestic111.com - you see proof that this “Silicon Valley Cartel” is a RICO law violating entity. In Case No. 20-03664 - https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2020/06/brown-v-google.pdf – you see further evidence that the Google-Youtube-Alphabet organization operates as a racketeering entity that controls portions of the government. In Case No. 1:12-CV-00774-mms
Recommended publications
  • Corruption and the Civil Service: a Review and Proposals for Improvement

    Corruption and the Civil Service: a Review and Proposals for Improvement

    CIVIL SERVICE MANAGEMENT AND CORRUPTION: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE DON’T Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling, University of Nottingham Kim Sass Mikkelsen, Roskilde University Christian Schuster, University College London This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Christian Schuster, Jan‐Hinrik Meyer‐Sahling, Kim Sass Mikkelsen, Civil Service Management and Corruption: What We Know and What We Don’t, Public Administration, 10.1111/padm.12404, (2018). Which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12404. This article may be used for non- commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Abstract Numerous studies have linked a range of economic, social, and institutional variables with corruption in government. Yet, most of this literature overlooks the management of public officials themselves. This is a relevant omission: almost all corrupt exchanges involve public officials. This article reviews studies – 36 in total – that do address civil service management and anti-corruption. It finds that prior works assess a narrow set of civil service management structures. Meritocratic recruitment and, less robustly, pay levels have been associated with lower corruption. By contrast, robust evidence on how corruption relates to other established public personnel management areas – such as distinct pay structures (rather than levels), promotion, transfer, and job stability practices – is largely unavailable. The article thus calls for research assessing the effects of a broader set of civil service management practices to gain a deeper understanding of corruption, and how to curb it. Introduction Since the early days of public administration as a research field, corruption containment has been among the central aims civil service reforms have sought to achieve (Wilson 1887).
  • Policy Paper N 10 a Joint Project Conducted By: 2007

    Policy Paper N 10 a Joint Project Conducted By: 2007

    Policy Paper N 10 An Assessment of Georgia’s National Integrity System: The GNISA Project A joint project conducted by: Tiri (the Governance – Access - Learning Network), London, UK The Institute of Ethics Governance and Law, Australia Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Georgia 2007 Funded by the Open Society Institute and the Open Society – Georgia Foundation © The Authors 2007 have asserted their rights under the Copyright Act 1968 to be identified as the authors of this work. An Assessment of Georgia’s National Integrity System: The GNISA Project A project carried out by the Institute for Ethics Governance and Law (IEGL), Tiri (the Governance - Access - Learning Network) and the Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development, as partners in this venture, and funded by the Open Society Institute. Final GNISA Report: July 2007 Lead Authors Dr Arthur Shacklock, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Mr Malkhaz Saldadze, Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Ms Carmel Connors, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Ms Melea Lewis, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Professor Charles Sampford, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Management Team Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Professor Charles Sampford Dr Arthur Shacklock Tiri (the Governance - Access - Learning Network): Mr Jeremy Pope Mr Martin Tisne Published by: Institute for Ethics Governance and Law, Griffith University
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60

    Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60

    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
  • First Name(S) Present Position Previous Positions / Relevant

    First Name(S) Present Position Previous Positions / Relevant

    Country Family Name(s) First Name(s) Present Position Previous Positions / Relevant Experience Bolivia Suxo Iturry Nardy Elizabeth Minister, Ministry for Former Vice- Minister for Institutional Transparency (Plurinational Institutional and Anti-Corruption Activities; Expert for Bolivia in the State of) Transparency and Anti- OAS-MESICIC Committee of Experts; Preparation of Corruption Activities evaluation reports on implementation of international anti-corruption instruments; Conception and formulation of policies for the prevention and combating of corruption in Bolivia; Coordination and implementation of transparency and social control strategies. Veizaga Bellido Gabriela Denisse Vice-Minister, Ministry Formulation and implementation of policies to combat for Institutional corruption, the punishment of acts of corruption, Transparency and Anti- recovery of assets, administration of assets recovered by Corruption Activities the State, awareness promotion among the general public and training of public servants; Supervision of investigations; follow-up and monitoring of judicial anti-corruption measures and proceedings; oversight of the presentation of reports; coordination and implementation of inter-institutional coordination strategies for the investigation and trial of cases of corruption; Participation in MESICIC; Former technical judge in the fourth trial court and investigating judge in pre-trial proceedings (district of Cochabamba). Camargo Ticona Carlos Fernando Vice-Minister for Formulation of public policies on transparency
  • State-Narco Networks and the ‘War on Drugs’ in Post-Transition Bolivia, with Special Reference to 1989-1993

    State-Narco Networks and the ‘War on Drugs’ in Post-Transition Bolivia, with Special Reference to 1989-1993

    Gillies, Allan Jack Joseph (2016) State-narco networks and the ‘War on drugs’ in post-transition Bolivia, with special reference to 1989-1993. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/7742/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] State-Narco Networks and the ‘War on Drugs’ in Post-Transition Bolivia, with special reference to 1989-1993 Allan Jack Joseph Gillies Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities College of Arts November 2016 University of Glasgow This work was supported by the University of Glasgow’s Lord Kelvin Adam Smith Scholarship scheme. i Table of Contents Declaration iii Abstract iv Acknowledgements vi List of Figures & Tables vii Abbreviations & Acronyms viii Chapter 1|Introduction 1 1.1 Case Selection 4 1.2 Advancing a Nuanced Understanding of State-Narco Networks 9 1.2.1 Alternative Paradigms of the ‘War on Drugs’ 10 1.2.2 The Coercion Literature 16 1.1.2 The ‘War on
  • The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy

    The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy

    Luke Howson University of Liverpool The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Luke Howson July 2014 Committee: Clive Jones, BA (Hons) MA, PhD Prof Jon Tonge, PhD 1 Luke Howson University of Liverpool © 2014 Luke Howson All Rights Reserved 2 Luke Howson University of Liverpool Abstract This thesis focuses on the role of ultra-orthodox party Shas within the Israeli state as a means to explore wider themes and divisions in Israeli society. Without underestimating the significance of security and conflict within the structure of the Israeli state, in this thesis the Arab–Jewish relationship is viewed as just one important cleavage within the Israeli state. Instead of focusing on this single cleavage, this thesis explores the complex structure of cleavages at the heart of the Israeli political system. It introduces the concept of a ‘cleavage pyramid’, whereby divisions are of different saliency to different groups. At the top of the pyramid is division between Arabs and Jews, but one rung down from this are the intra-Jewish divisions, be they religious, ethnic or political in nature. In the case of Shas, the religious and ethnic elements are the most salient. The secular–religious divide is a key fault line in Israel and one in which ultra-orthodox parties like Shas are at the forefront. They and their politically secular counterparts form a key division in Israel, and an exploration of Shas is an insightful means of exploring this division further, its history and causes, and how these groups interact politically.
  • Annexation of Georgia in Russian Empire

    Annexation of Georgia in Russian Empire

    1 George Anchabadze HISTORY OF GEORGIA SHORT SKETCH Caucasian House TBILISI 2005 2 George Anchabadze. History of Georgia. Short sketch Above-mentioned work is a research-popular sketch. There are key moments of the history of country since ancient times until the present moment. While working on the sketch the author based on the historical sources of Georgia and the research works of Georgian scientists (including himself). The work is focused on a wide circle of the readers. გიორგი ანჩაბაძე. საქართველოს ისტორია. მოკლე ნარკვევი წინამდებარე ნაშრომი წარმოადგენს საქართველოს ისტორიის სამეცნიერ-პოპულარულ ნარკვევს. მასში მოკლედაა გადმოცემული ქვეყნის ისტორიის ძირითადი მომენტები უძველესი ხანიდან ჩვენს დრომდე. ნარკვევზე მუშაობისას ავტორი ეყრდნობოდა საქართველოს ისტორიის წყაროებსა და ქართველ მეცნიერთა (მათ შორის საკუთარ) გამოკვლევებს. ნაშრომი განკუთვნილია მკითხველთა ფართო წრისათვის. ISBN99928-71-59-8 © George Anchabadze, 2005 © გიორგი ანჩაბაძე, 2005 3 Early Ancient Georgia (till the end of the IV cen. B.C.) Existence of ancient human being on Georgian territory is confirmed from the early stages of anthropogenesis. Nearby Dmanisi valley (80 km south-west of Tbilisi) the remnants of homo erectus are found, age of them is about 1,8 million years old. At present it is the oldest trace in Euro-Asia. Later on the Stone Age a man took the whole territory of Georgia. Former settlements of Ashel period (400–100 thousand years ago) are discovered as on the coast of the Black Sea as in the regions within highland Georgia. Approximately 6–7 thousands years ago people on the territory of Georgia began to use as the instruments not only the stone but the metals as well.
  • Monitoring Report

    Monitoring Report

    ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ANTI-CORRUPTION NETWORK FOR EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA ISTANBUL ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN Third Round of Monitoring GEORGIA Monitoring Report The report was adopted at the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan plenary meeting on 25 September 2013 at the OECD Headquarters in Paris. Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 3 Anti-corruption policy .................................................................................................................................... 3 Criminalisation of corruption ....................................................................................................................... 3 Prevention of corruption ............................................................................................................................... 4 Third round of monitoring ............................................................................................................ 6 Country background information ............................................................................................... 8 Economic and social situation ...................................................................................................................... 8 Political system ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Trends in corruption
  • Development Perspectives of the XXI Century

    Development Perspectives of the XXI Century

    Caucasus University Friedrich Ebert Foundation International Students’ Scientific Conference Development perspectives of the XXI century Georgia, 8-11 May, 2009 UDC 330/34(479) (063) s-249 D-49 krebulSi ganTavsebulia samecniero naSromebi, SerCeuli meore saerTaSoriso studenturi samecniero konferenciisaTvis `21-e saukune _ ganviTarebis perspeq- tivebi~, romlis umTavresi mizania studentTa dasabuTebuli Tvalsazrisis warmoCena TavianTi qveynebis ganviTarebis perspeqtivaze. agreTve erTiani xedvis SemuSaveba msoflios winaSe mdgari problemebis gadawyvetis Taobaze. The collection contains works of the Second International Student’s Scientific Conference “Development Perspectives of the XXI century”. The major goal of the conference is to present reasonable arguments from the students of the countries of Europe and South Caucasus on European integration opportunities. Here also one can find the initiative on forming entire vision for solving key problems, facing Europe and South Caucasus. gamomcemeli: kavkasiis universiteti _ fridrix ebertis fondis mxardaWeriT Published by Caucasus University, with the support of Friedrich Ebert Foundation saredaqcio kolegia: Salva maWavariani (Tavmjdomare), indrek iakobsoni, giorgi RaRaniZe, londa esaZe, lia CaxunaSvili, naTia amilaxvari, dina oniani, naTia narsaviZe. Ed. board: Shalva Machavariani (head), Indrek Jakobson, Giorgi Gaganidze, Londa Esadze, Lia Chakhunashvili, Natia Amilakhvari, Dina Oniani, Natia Narsavidze. ISSN 1987-5703 Tbilisi, 2008 Contents 1. Ana Kostava The self-determination principle and
  • Georgia RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018

    Georgia RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018

    Georgia RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018 KNOWYOURCOUNTRY.COM Executive Summary - Georgia Sanctions: None FAFT list of AML No Deficient Countries US Dept of State Money Laundering Assessment Higher Risk Areas: Not on EU White list equivalent jurisdictions Failed States Index (Political Issues)(Average Score) Non - Compliance with FATF 40 + 9 Recommendations Medium Risk Areas: Corruption Index (Transparency International & W.G.I.) World Governance Indicators (Average Score) Major Investment Areas: Agriculture - products: citrus, grapes, tea, hazelnuts, vegetables; livestock Industries: steel, machine tools, electrical appliances, mining (manganese, copper, and gold), chemicals, wood products, wine Exports - commodities: vehicles, ferro-alloys, fertilizers, nuts, scrap metal, gold, copper ores Exports - partners: Azerbaijan 13.8%, US 8.5%, Germany 8.3%, Bulgaria 7.4%, Kazakhstan 7%, Turkey 6.4%, Ukraine 6.3%, Lebanon 5.7%, Canada 4.2% (2012) Imports - commodities: fuels, vehicles, machinery and parts, grain and other foods, pharmaceuticals Imports - partners: Turkey 13.9%, China 8.2%, Ukraine 8.2%, Russia 7.4%, Azerbaijan 7.1%, US 6%, Germany 5.6%, Bulgaria 4% (2012) 1 Investment Restrictions: Georgia is open to foreign investment, and the Georgia National Investment Agency is implementing an aggressive marketing campaign to encourage more foreign investors to come to Georgia. Exceptions to national treatment may be made by Georgia for investments in maritime fisheries; air and maritime transport and related activities; ownership of broadcast, common carrier, or aeronautical radio stations; communications satellites Foreign individuals and companies are restricted from holding agricultural land in Georgia. However, according to the US Department of State 2012, there is a loophole in which agricultural land can be purchased by non-nationals and then transferred under the name of a Georgian entity; thus, land can be up to 100% foreign-owned.
  • Georgia's Anti-Corruption Policy in the Context of Eu Association Process

    Georgia's Anti-Corruption Policy in the Context of Eu Association Process

    SMALL STEPS TOWARDS BIG GOALS: GEORGIA’S ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE CONTEXT OF EU ASSOCIATION PROCESS JUNE 2019 The publication was prepared with the financial support of Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). Transparency International Georgia is responsible for the content of the publication. It might not necessarily reflect the views of SIDA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Association Agreement between the European Union and Georgia, as well as the Association Agenda for 2017-2020 approved by the parties to facilitate the implementation of the Association Agreement, provide for cooperation between the parties in combating corruption, while highlighting Georgia’s commitment to address corruption, in particular complex corruption. Over the year and a half since the adoption of the current Association Agenda, Georgia has attained positive results in terms of maintaining previous achievements in terms of eradicating petty corruption. However, Georgia’s progress in tackling high-level corruption remains weak. According to public opinion surveys, citizens have a negative view of both the overall situation in the country in terms of corruption and the dynamics of this situation. They believe that the government does not effectively investigate the cases of corruption involving high-ranking officials or influential individuals with ties to the ruling party. Such public attitudes evidently stem from the ineffective response of the law enforcement agencies to recent high-profile cases of alleged corruption related to a variety
  • The Crimes and Lies of Elon Musk

    The Crimes and Lies of Elon Musk

    THE CRIMES AND LIES OF ELON MUSK 1 Table of Contents Elon Musk, his lawyers, CPA’s and Goldman Sach’s insiders were hacked..............................................3 The World’s Biggest Government Funds Mooch.......................................................................................5 Elon Musk is a techno-criminal and master stock market manipulator..............................................11 Let’s Count Elon Musk’s Lies And Scams...............................................................................................13 The Musk Spin.........................................................................................................................................57 The Musk Conundrum.............................................................................................................................63 Elon Musk’s Mental Problems.................................................................................................................66 How evil is Musk? What are his Machiavellian traits and signs of psychopathy...............................69 From Little Elon To Big Douche-Bag – The Musk Life Cycle...............................................................71 The Vendetta’s And Attacks By The Very Vengeful Elon Musk..............................................................88 References And Evidence Links..............................................................................................................91 Civil Notices..........................................................................................................................................380