DOCSLIB.ORG

Osbornellus Affinis (Osborn) 226. Female 7Th Stern Ite, Ventral View. Osbornellus Castaneus N. Sp. 227. Same. Osbornellus Obscurus N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Osbornellus Affinis (Osborn) 226. Female 7Th Stern Ite, Ventral View. Osbornellus Castaneus N. Sp. 227. Same. Osbornellus Obscurus N 378 226 228 227 229 231 230 233 232 235 234 Osbornellus affinis (Osborn) 226. Female 7th s te rn ite , ventral view. Osbornellus castaneus n. sp. 227. Same. Osbornellus obscurus n. sp. 228. Same. Osbornellus flavibrunneus n. sp. 229. Same. Osbornellus colossus n. sp. 230. Same. Osbornellus b o realis DeLong and Mohr 231. Same. Osbornellus sticrmatus n. sp. 232. Same. Osbornellus sinuatus n. sp. 233. Same. Osbornellus angustatus DeLong 234. Same. Osbornellus fasclatus Metcalf 235. Same. Osbornellus crilvus n. sp. 236. Same. 376 214 215 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 Osbornellus fulvomaculatus (Osborn) 214. Female 7th s te rn ite , ventral view Osbornellus auerreroensls n. sp. 215. Same. Osbornellus tripartitus DeLong 216. Same. Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher) 217. Same. Osbornellus limosus DeLong 218. Same. Osbornellus rotundus Beamer 219. Same. Osbornellus vicinus Linnavuori and Heller 220. Same. Osbornellus hvalinus (Osborn) 221. Same. Osbornellus pulliqalbus n. sp. 222. Same. Osbornellus compressus Linnavuori 223. Same. Osbornellus oiroulus DeLong and Martinson 224. Same. Osbornellus reversus DeLong 225. Same. 374 206 207 208 209 212 213 8 210 211 373 Osbornellus crilvus n. sp. 206. Aedeagus, ventral view. 207. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus bimarcrinatus bimarqinatus (DeLong) 208. Aedeagus, ventral view. 209. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus bimarqinatus montanus Caldwell and Martorell 210. Aedeagus, ventral view (from Caldwell and Martorell 1952). 211. Same, lateral view (from Caldwell and Martorell 1952). Osbornellus multivittatus n. sp, 212. Aedeagus, ventral view. 213. Same, lateral view. 194 192 193 195 199 198 . 196 197 ♦ 202 200 201 205 203 204 Osbornellus mexioanus (Osborn) 192. Aedeagus, ventral view. 193* Same, la te ra l view. Osbornellus infuscatus Linnavuori 194. Aedeagus, la te r a l view. Osbornellus alveus DeLong and Martinson 195. Aedeagus, v e n tra l view. 196. Same, la te ra l view. Osbornellus sinuatus n. sp. 197. Aedeagus, v e n tra l view. 198. Same, la te ra l view. Osbornellus imgustatus DeLong 199. Aedeagus, v e n tra l view. 200. Same, la te ra l view. Osbornellus crocus n. sp. « 201. Aedeagus, v e n tra l view. 202. Same, la te ra l view. 203. S ty le , ventral view. Osbornellus fasciatus Metcalf 204. Aedeagus, v e n tra l view. 205. Same, la te ra l view. 370 179 178 176 177 4 8 i\V 181 183 180 182 II 187 185 A 186 184 I 188 189 190 191 Osbornellus rubellus DeLong 176. Aedeagus, ventral view. 177. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus omani Beamer 178. Aedeagus, ventral view. 179. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus unus n. sp. 180. Aedeagus, ventral view. 181. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus stiomatus n. sp. 182. Aedeagus, ventral view. 183. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus leucosticrmatus n. sp. 184. Aedeagus, ventral view. 185. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus pallidus Beamer 186. Aedeagus, ventral view. 187. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus olarus Beamer 188. Aedeagus, ventral view. 189. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus flexuosus Linnavuori 190. Aedeagus, ventral view. 191. Same, lateral view. 368 168 166 167 169 171 172 170 174 173 175 Osbornellus scalaris (Van Duzee) 166. Aedeagus, lateral view. Osbornellus crrandis DeLong 167. Aedeagus, v en tral view. 168. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus remotus DeLong and Martinson 169. Aedeagus, v entral view. 170. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus spinosus DeLong 171. Aedeagus, ventral view. 172. Same, lateral view. 173. Pygofer, lateral view (spination omitted). Osbornellus rarus DeLong 174. Aedeagus, v en tral view. 175. Same, lateral view. * r 366 I 155 156 f) 154 158 160 161 159 164 162 163 165 Osbornellus oonsors (Uhler) 154. Aedeagus, lateral view. Osbornellus fumidus Beamer 155. Aedeagus, ventral view. 156. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus borealis DeLong and Mohr 157. Aedeagus, ventral view. 158. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus camptus n. sp. 159. Aedeagus, ventral view. 160. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus albocinctus DeLong 161. Aedeagus, ventral view. 162. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus lineatus Beamer 163. Aedeagus, ventral view. 164. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus scalaris (Vt< i Duzee) 165. Aedeagus, ventral view. 364 143 14 5 142 144 k 147 146 149 148 150 152 IS 151 153 Osbornellus icmavus Ball 142. Aedeagus, lateral view. Osbornellus apioatus DeLong 143. Aedeagus, lateral view (from DeLong 1941b). Osbornellus ohromatus n. sp. 144. Aedeagus, ventral view. 145. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus ritanus Ball 146. Aedeagus, ventral view. 147. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus cvrtooaulus n. sp. 148. Aedeagus, ventral view. 149. Same, lateral view. 150. Style, ventral view. Osbornellus appressus DeLong 151. Aedeagus, ventral view. 152. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus consors (Uhler) 153. Aedeagus, ventral view. 362 131 130 132 133 134 135 136 137 V 140 At> 138 139 ' --------------- 1 141 Osbornellus spicatus Beamer 130. Aedeagus, ventral view. 131. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus corniqer Beamer 132. Aedeagus, ventral view. 133. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus bifasciatus Beamer 134. Aedeagus, ventral view. 135. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus tenuis Beamer 136. Aedeagus, v entral view. 137. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus aciicapitus n. sp. 138. Aedeagus, ventral view. 139. Same, lateral view. ■ Osbornellus albolineus DeLong 140. Aedeagus, lateral view (from DeLong 1941b). Osbornellus ignavus Ball 141. Aedeagus, ventral view. 360 123 122 121 125 126 124 127 128 129 Osbornellus lamellaris Linnavuori 121. Aedeagus, lateral view (from Linnavuori 19S9). Osbornellus alaudus DeLong 122. Aedeagus, ventral view. 123. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus ecuadoricus Linnavuori 124. Aedeagus, ventral view. 125. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus alatus Beamer 126. Aedeagus, ventral view. 127. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus decorus Beamer 128. Aedeagus, ventral view. 129. Same, lateral view. 358. 115 116 114 117 118 120 119 Osbornellus excavatus DeLong and Martinson 114. lygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) Osbornellus furoillatus DeLong 115. Aedeagus, ventral view. 116. Same, la te r a l view. 117. lygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) 118. P late, v entral view. Osbornellus libratus DeLong 119. Aedeagus, v entral view. 120. Same, la te r a l view. 356 105 102 103 104 106 107 108 109 112 113 110 111 Osbornellus salsus DeLong 102. Aedeagus, ventral view. 103. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus ater Beamer 104. Aedeagus, ventral view. 105. Same, la te ra l view. Osbornellus filamentus DeLong and Beery 106. Aedeagus, ven tral view. 107. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus trifrustrus DeLong and Martinson 108. Aedeagus, ventral view. 109. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus colossus n. sp. 110. Aedeagus, ventral view. 1 1 1 . Same, lateral view. « « Osbornellus excavatus DeLong and Martinson 112. Aedeagus, ventral view. 1 1 3 . Same, lateral view. 354 Osbornellus reversus DeLong 91. Eygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) Osbornellus affinis (Osborn) 92. Aedeagus, ventral view. 93. Same* lateral view. Osbornellus oastaneus n. sp. 94. Aedeagus, ventral view. 95. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus obscurus n. sp. 96. Aedeagus, ventral view. 97. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus flavibrunneus n. sp. 98. Aedeagus, ventral view. 99. Same, lateral view, Osbornellus capitatus DeLong and Knull 100. Aedeagus, ventral view. 1 0 1 . Same, lateral view. 352- 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Osbornellus pandus DeLong 83. Aedeagus, ventral view. 84. Same, lateral view. 85. Eygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) Osbornellus circulus DeLong and Martinson 86. Aedeagus, ventral view. 87. Same, lateral view. 88. Eygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) Osbornellus reversus DeLong 89. Aedeagus, ventral view. 90. Same, lateral view. 350 73 75 78 79 76 77 ■ 80 82 Osbornellus eurvcephalus n. sp. 73. Aedeagus, ventral view. 74. Same, lateral view. 75. lygofer, lateral view (spination omitted). Osbornellus linnavuori DeLong 76. Aedeagus, ventral view (from Linnavuori 1959). 77. Same, lateral view (from Linnavuori 1959). Osbornellus compressus Linnavuori 78. Aedeagus, ventral view. 79. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus lunus DeLong 80. Aedeagus, ventral view. 81. Same, lateral view. 82. Pygofer, lateral view (spination omitted). 348 65 66 64 68 69 67 7170 72 Osbornellus antlerus DeLong and Martinson 64. Aedeagus, lateral view. Osbornellus spinellus DeLong and Martinson 65. Aedeagus, ventral view. 66. Same, lateral view. 67. lygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) Osbornellus respublicanus (Berg) 68. Aedeagus, ventral view. 69. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus hamatus DeLong and Martinson 70. Aedeagus, ventral view. 71. Same, lateral view. 72. lygofer, lateral view (spination omitted) 346 55 57 56 59 60 58 * 62 63 61 Osbornellus pusillus n. sp, 55. Aedeagus, lateral view. Osbornellus vicinus Linnavuori and Heller 56. Aedeagus, ventral view. 57. Same, lateral view. 58. lygofer, lateral view (spination omitted). Osbornellus hvalinus (Osborn) 59. Aedeagus, ventral view. 60. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus pullicralbus n. sp. 61. Aedeagus, ventral view. 62. Same, lateral view. Osbornellus antlerus DeLong and Martinson 63. Aedeagus, ventral view. 344 Osbornellus asperus DeLong and Martinson 46. Plate, ventral view. Osbornellus spiniloba Linnavuori and Heller 47. Aedeagus, ventral view. 48. Same, lateral view. 49. Plate, ventral view. Osbornellus unicolor (Osborn) 50. Aedeagus, ventral view. 51. Same, lateral view. 52. lygofer, lateral view (most spination:omitted). 53. Plate, ventral view. Osbornellus pusillus n, sp, 54. Aedeagus, ventral view. 341 Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher) 34. Style, ventral view.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Assessment for the Kansan Spikerush Leafhopper (Dorydiella Kansana Beamer)
    Conservation Assessment For The Kansan spikerush leafhopper (Dorydiella kansana Beamer) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region January 11, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers, Or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae)
    BULLETIN of the ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY HARLOW B. MILLS, Chief The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae) D. M. DELONG PriDted by Authority of the STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Govtrnor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Dirtctor STATE t) F I 1. I, I N O I S DwiGiiT H. CiREES', Governor PEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION ANi:) EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director \^ ^- \' N A T U R A L HISTORY S U R E I ) I 1 S I O N Hari.o\\ B. Mii.i.s, (-liicf \ olumc 24 BULI^K TIN Article 2 The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae— Balcluthinae) ]). M. 1)1 f,c)Nc; Priulid hy Jul/iority of the Stall- of Illinois URBANA, ILLINOIS June 194S STATE OF ILLINOIS DwiGHT H. Green, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION Frank G. Thompson, Chairman A. E. Emerson, Ph.D., Rio/oxv George D. Stoddard, Ph.D., Litt.D., L.H.D., L. H Tiffany, Ph.D., Forestry LL.D., President of the Ihiivcrsily nj Illinois l' R. Howson, B.S.C.E., C.E., Walter H. Newhoi'isk, Ph.D., Geology Engineering Roger Adams, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Urbana, Illinois Scientific and Technical Staff H.^Ri.ow B. Mills, Ph.D., Chief Bessie B. Henderson, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Section of Economic Entomology Section of Forestry Entomologist George C. Decker, Ph.D., WiLLET N. Wandell, M.F., Forester and and Head Head M.S., Entomologist J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhopper Vectors of Phytopathogenic Viruses (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) Taxonomy, Biology, and Virus Transmission
    /«' THE LEAFHOPPER VECTORS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC VIRUSES (HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE) TAXONOMY, BIOLOGY, AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION Technical Bulletin No. 1382 Agricultural Research Service UMTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals gave valuable assistance in the preparation of this work, for which I am deeply grateful. I am especially indebted to Miss Julianne Rolfe for dissecting and preparing numerous specimens for study and for recording data from the literature on the subject matter. Sincere appreciation is expressed to James P. Kramer, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., for providing the bulk of material for study, for allowing access to type speci- mens, and for many helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to William J. Knight, British Museum (Natural History), London, for loan of valuable specimens, for comparing type material, and for giving much useful information regarding the taxonomy of many important species. I am also grateful to the following persons who allowed me to examine and study type specimens: René Beique, Laval Univer- sity, Ste. Foy, Quebec; George W. Byers, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag, Ohio State University, Columbus; Jean L. LaiFoon, Iowa State University, Ames; and S. L. Tuxen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Co- penhagen, Denmark. To the following individuals who provided additional valuable material for study, I give my sincere thanks: E. W. Anthon, Tree Fruit Experiment Station, Wenatchee, Wash.; L. M. Black, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana; W. E. China, British Museum (Natu- ral History), London; L. N. Chiykowski, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa ; G. H. L. Dicker, East Mailing Research Sta- tion, Kent, England; J.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae), with Description of Two New Species
    Zootaxa 3985 (2): 275–283 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3985.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FC76B5A6-3A06-4C0B-8F17-9A4AFC3687E5 Bicoloratum Dai and Li, a new synonym of the leafhopper genus Scaphoideus Uhler (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae), with description of two new species FANGYING CHEN & WU DAI1 Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Integrated Management, Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Col- lege of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University. Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Bicoloratum Dai and Li, 2011 is considered to be a junior synonym of Scaphoideus Uhler, 1889 based on study of speci- mens of two new species, one of which is morphologically very similar to the type species of Bicoloratum, B. pintungisis Dai and Li 2011. Three valid species now included within the genus Scaphoideus are: S. dinghuensis sp. nov., S. taishanensis sp. nov. and S. pingtungisis (Dai and Li, 2011) n. comb. The detailed morphology of the two new species is described, and photographs of their external habitus and male and female genitalia are also given. Key words: Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, leafhoppers, Scaphoideus, Bicoloratum, new species Introduction Deltocephalinae is the most speciose subfamily of Cicadellidae, with species distributed on all continents but being especially diverse in the tropics, subtropical and temperate forest ecosystems, including 38 tribes, 923 genera, and approximately 6700 valid species (Zahniser and Dietrich, 2010, 2013). The tribe Scaphoideini is one of the more controversial groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomes, Plant Hosts and Vectors This Page Intentionally Left Blank PHYTOPLASMAS Genomes, Plant Hosts and Vectors
    PHYTOPLASMAS Genomes, Plant Hosts and Vectors This page intentionally left blank PHYTOPLASMAS Genomes, Plant Hosts and Vectors Edited by Phyllis G. Weintraub Agricultural Research Organization Gilat Research Center Israel and Phil Jones Rothamsted Research UK CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI North American Offi ce Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org CAB International 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Phytoplasmas : genomes, plant hosts, and vectors / editors, Phyllis G. Weintraub & Phil Jones. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84593-530-6 (alk. paper) 1. Phytoplasmas. I. Weintraub, Phyllis G. II. Jones, Phil, 1947- III. Title. SB738.P59 2010 632′.32--dc22 2009019575 ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 530 6 Typeset by AMA Dataset, Preston, UK. Printed and bound in the UK by MPG Books Group. The paper used for the text pages in this book is FSC certifi ed. The FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) is an international network to promote responsible management of the world’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for the Reflexed Indiangrass Leafhopper (Flexamia Reflexa (Osborn and Ball))
    Conservation Assessment for the Reflexed Indiangrass Leafhopper (Flexamia reflexa (Osborn and Ball)) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region October 18, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Cicadellidae
    Acta Biol. Par., Curitiba, 35 (3-4): 89-161. 2006. 89 Catalogue of the neotropical (including north of Mexico) Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Part I — Athysanini and Deltocephalini excluded 1 Catálogo dos Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) neotropicais (incluíndo o norte do México). Parte I — Athysanini e Deltocephalini excluídos KETI M. R. ZANOL TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 90 Acronyms of the institutions mentioned 91 ACINOPTERINI Oman, 1943 91 CERRILLINI Linnavuori, 1975 93 CICADULINI Van Duzee, 1892 94 DORATURINI Ribaut, 1952 94 HECALINI Distant, 1908 97 LUHERIINI Linnavuori, 1959 101 MACROSTELINI Kirkaldy, 1906 101 OPSIINI Emeljanov, 1962 110 PENTHIMIINI Kirschbaum, 1868 111 PLATYMETOPIINI Haupt, 1929 112 SCAPHOIDEINI Oman, 1943 113 SCAPHYTOPIINI Oman, 1943 119 STENOMETOPIINI Baker, 1923 131 Genera Incertae Sedis 133 Resumo 134 Summary 134 Résumé 135 Bibliogography 135 Index 150 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brazil. E-mail, [email protected]. Fellowship of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico -CNPq. 90 Acta Biol. Par., Curitiba, 35 (3-4): 89-161. 2006. In the General Catalogue of the Homoptera (METCALF, 1967) contains 36 genera and 215 Neotropical species, including north of Mexico distributed within 10 tribes (two genera and six species in Euscelini, one genera and one species in Colladonini, one genus and one species in Goniagnathini, four genera and 52 species in Acinopterini, one genus and one species in Cicadulini, four genera and 80 species in Scaphytopiini, five genera and 32 species in Balcluthini, one genus and one species in Macrostelini, three genera and five species in Platymetopiini and 14 genera and 82 species in Scaphoideini).
    [Show full text]
  • PRA Phytoplasma Phoenicium
    EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 17-23265 Pest Risk Analysis for ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (Bacteria: Acholeplasmataceae) causing almond witches’ broom September 2017 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This risk assessment follows the EPPO Standard PM 5/5(1) Decision-Support Scheme for an Express Pest Risk Analysis (available at http://archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/pra.htm) and uses the terminology defined in ISPM 5 Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms (available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php). This document was first elaborated by an Expert Working Group and then reviewed by the Panel on Phytosanitary Measures and if relevant other EPPO bodies. Cite this document as: EPPO (2017) Pest risk analysis for ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’. EPPO, Paris. Available at http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Pest_Risk_Analysis/PRA_intro.htm and https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PHYPPH Photo: Witches’ Broom on almond. Courtesy: Marina Molino Lova (AVSI-Lebanon) 1 17-23265 (17-22751, 17-22511, 16-22364, 16-22291, 16-22231, 16-22152) Based on this PRA, ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’ was added to the A1 Lists of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests in 2017. Pest Risk Analysis for ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (Bacteria: Acholeplasmataceae) causing almond witches’ broom PRA area: EPPO region Prepared by: EWG on 'Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium' Date: 6-9 December 2016 (the PRA was further reviewed and amended by other EPPO bodies, see below) Composition of the Expert Working Group (EWG) ABOU-JAWDAH Yusuf (Prof.) Agriculture Department, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, 11-0236, 1107-2020 Riad El-Solh, Lebanon Tel: +961-1343002 - [email protected] AVENDANO GARCIA Nuria (Ms) TRAGSATEC, C/Julian Camarillo, 6a.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Study of the Genus Scaphoideus Uhler (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) from Japan
    Zootaxa 3750 (5): 515–533 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3750.5.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68329017-1153-45E5-B3EE-AE8709A5E69B Taxonomic study of the genus Scaphoideus Uhler (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) from Japan SATOSHI KAMITANI1 & MASAMI HAYASHI2 1Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8581 Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Saitama University, Saitama, 338-8570 Japan. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Japanese species of the genus Scaphoideus are revised. Eight species are recognized from Japan, including four new species: S. ryukyuensis sp. nov. from the Ryukyus, S. pristiophorus sp. nov. from Honshu and Kyushu, S. aurantius sp. nov. from the Ryukyus and S. brevistylus sp. nov. from Honshu, Kyushu and the Ryukyus. Key words: Auchenorrhyncha, new species, taxonomy, morphology Introduction The genus Scaphoideus Uhler is distributed in the Holarctic, Oriental and Afrotropic Regions, and comprises about 160 species (Kitbamroong & Freytag 1978; Li et al. 2011; Li & Wang 2002; Viraktamath & Mohan 2004; Webb & Viraktamath 2007). The Japanese species of Scaphoideus are generally characterized by the presence of a pair of large processes on the connective. Four species have been recorded from Japan: S. albovittatus Matsumura, S. kumamotonis Matsumura, S. festivus Matsumura and S. rubroguttatus Matsumura. In the text, the following abbreviations are used for the repositories of the material examined: Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka (ELKU); Natural Resources Inventory Center, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba (NIAES); Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Saitama University, Saitama (SUU).
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Sharpshooters (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in Virginia Vineyards, a Region of Expanding Concern for Pierce's Disease'
    A Survey of Sharpshooters (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in Virginia Vineyards, a Region of Expanding Concern for Pierce's Disease' Anna K. Wallingford2 and Douglas G. Pfeiffer Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA J. Entomol. ScL 47(4): 360-365 (October 2012) Abstract A survey was conducted during the 2006 and 2007 growing seasons to record the presence of sharpshooters (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) vectors of Pierce's disease in Vitis vinifera L. growing regions of Virginia. Oncometopia orbona (F.) and Graphocephala versuta (Say) were consistently trapped in all regions and throughout each growing season, the latter trapped in the highest number. Peak flight of both species occurred early in the season, the time of greatest concern for introduction of infection. Peak flight of O. orbona occurred earlier than that of G. versuta. Homalodisca insolita (Walker) was trapped in the Coastal Plain of Virginia; this is the most northern record of this species to date. Key words Pierce's disease, sharpshooters, Oncometopia orbona, Graphocephala versuta, Homalodisca insolita Pierce's disease is a vascular disease of grapes caused by the xylem-limited bac- terium Xylella fastidiosa (Wells). The causal agent is transmitted by sharpshooters (xylem-feeding Cicadellidae; Frazier and Freitag 1946), and by some froghoppers (Cercopidae; Severin 1950). Vine decline occurs when xylem fluids are blocked by proliferation of bacterial colonies as well as by plant response to infection (Hopkins 1989, Newman et al. 2003, Stevenson et al. 2005). In mild climates, vine death can occur within 2 - 3 yrs of initial infection (Gubler et al. 2006). The primary mode of X.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]