DOCSLIB.ORG

East London River Crossings: Assessment of Need

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East London River Crossings: Assessment of Need TRANSPORT FOR LONDON RIVER CROSSINGS: SILVERTOWN TUNNEL SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION This report is part of a wider EAST LONDON RIVER suite of documents which CROSSINGS: outline our approach to traffic, environmental, optioneering ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS and engineering disciplines, amongst others. We would Transport for London like to know if you have any October 2012 comments on our approach to this work. To give us your This report sets out in detail the need for views, please respond to our additional river crossings in east London consultation at and to provide the context to the www.tfl.gov.uk/silvertown- development of the outstanding tunnel proposals which were outlined in Mayor’s Transport Strategy. Please note that consultation on the Silvertown Tunnel is running from October – December 2014 East London River Crossings: Assessment of Need Date: October 2012 TfL Planning River crossings: Assessment of need CONTENTS 1. Strategic context ............................................................................................................ 3 2. Purpose of this report ..................................................................................................... 7 3. Background ..................................................................................................................... 8 4. Statutory planning context ............................................................................................ 12 5. Population, employment and economic development .................................................. 25 6. Public and stakeholder context ..................................................................................... 33 7. Public transport, walking and cycling networks ............................................................. 37 8. Highway network .......................................................................................................... 45 9. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................. 83 2 TfL Planning River crossings: Assessment of need 1. STRATEGIC CONTEXT 1.1. There is a clearly defined policy framework for London which looks forward to 2031 and defines the key challenges that London has to address over this period. 1.2. This is set out in the London Plan (the Mayor’s special development strategy) and the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS), finalised in 2011 and 2010 respectively and providing clear policy direction through to 2031. These two documents provide the statutory framework for the boroughs to develop their own local development frameworks. 1.3. The overall thrust of these documents is that London is a growing city, with growth at the highest levels since the inter-war period. There is a focus on generating jobs and growth to meet the demands of a rising population, and transport is a critical component in helping to achieve this. 1.4. Investment in transport has helped London secure an overall reduction in the amount of car use and sustained increases in public transport, walking and cycling. It is essential that this trend continues into the future and further investment in public transport capacity is a fundamental part of this strategy. In addition, the scale of growth and concentration of this growth in the eastern parts of London means that further investment in the road network is also required. London Plan (2011) 1.5. The London Plan (LP), published in 2011, is the statutory spatial plan for London, which sets out the strategic vision for Greater London up to 2031. The LP considered the strategic issues of the scale of growth London will need to accommodate over the next two decades, and considered alternative spatial development policies which could be adopted to meet the forecasts for population and employment growth. This included options of intensification of central London, a decentralised policy with higher levels of development in outer London, and other options including the potential of brownfield land to accommodate growth. 1.6. The LP concludes that east London, with its large areas of ex-industrial brownfield land and improving transport links, should play a major role in London’s growth, and that with investment in infrastructure, many of London’s new jobs and homes can be accommodated in the east sub-region (which comprises boroughs in both east and south east London). However achieving this development is likely to require investment in the infrastructure, including the road infrastructure and improving cross-river connectivity. 1.7. The London Plan forecasts an additional 650,000 jobs and an increase in population of 1.2 million up to 2031. Of these increases, 37% of the additional employment and 22% of the additional population will be in the east sub-region. 1.8. The London Plan clearly sets out the need for additional river crossings in Policy 6.4, Policy 6.12, and Table 6.1. 3 TfL Planning River crossings: Assessment of need Mayor’s Transport Strategy (2010) 1.9. The Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS), published in 2010, sets out the transport strategy for London, based upon the work undertaken by the GLA for the London Plan. This includes the strategy for delivering the transport infrastructure needed to accommodate growth in the east sub-region, which is a key part of the London Plan’s strategic vision. 1.10. The MTS identifies a wide range of policies and proposals to support this growth. It is based around three key policy areas: (i) Better co-ordination and integration of planning and transport; (ii) Providing new capacity; (iii) Managing the demand to travel. 1.11. Overall, the implementation of the strategy would see the existing increase in public transport usage continue, together with an increase in cycling, and a corresponding decrease in car use. 1.12. Nevertheless, the London Plan and Mayor’s Transport Strategy identify a clear need to progress a package of river crossings for east London, to help deliver growth and to meet the overall objectives of the MTS. Part of this need is a need to improve river crossings for road users, addressing the existing problems with the current infrastructure and to plan for the substantial growth that is identified for the surrounding area. 1.13. Figure 1.1 below outlines the MTS policy on river crossings. Figure 1.1: MTS Proposal 39: River Crossings The Mayor, through TfL, and working with the London boroughs and other stakeholders, will take forward a package of river crossings in east London, including: a) A new fixed link at Silvertown to provide congestion relief to the Blackwall Tunnel and provide local links for vehicle traffic b) An upgraded Woolwich Ferry and consideration of a new vehicle ferry at Gallions Reach to improve connectivity c) Local links to improve connections for pedestrians and cyclists d) Consideration of a longer-term fixed link at Gallions Reach to improve connectivity for local traffic, buses, cyclists and to support economic development in this area e) The encouragement of modal shift from private cars to public transport, using new rail links including High Speed One domestic services, Crossrail and the DLR extension to Woolwich, reducing road demand, and so road congestion at river crossings, where possible f) Support for Government proposals to reduce congestion at the Dartford crossing 4 TfL Planning River crossings: Assessment of need 1.14. Significant progress has been made in providing improved public transport services, with Crossrail still to come from 2018. Work on local cross-river links for those on foot or using cycles has resulted in the River Concordat and extension of Oyster Pay As You Go to Thames Clipper services, and the introduction of the Emirates Air Line between Greenwich and Newham. Each of the three Woolwich ferries has been overhauled, although further decisions will be required as to their eventual replacement. 1.15. Transport for London has also been engaging closely with the Department for Transport on the options for the Dartford Crossing, including the replacement of the toll plazas with free-flow tolling, and the development of plans for new capacity at or downstream of Dartford. 1.16. Figure 1.2 below illustrates the progress made to date. Figure 1.2: MTS Proposal 39: River Crossings progress to date The Mayor, through TfL, and working with the London boroughs and other stakeholders, will take forward a package of river crossings in east London, including: a) A new fixed link at Silvertown to provide congestion relief to the Blackwall Tunnel and provide local links for vehicle traffic b) An upgraded Woolwich Ferry and consideration All three Woolwich Ferries overhauled of a new vehicle ferry at Gallions Reach to improve by MMS Shipyard, Hull, in 2009 connectivity c) Local links to improve connections for River concordat (2009) pedestrians and cyclists Oyster on Clippers (2009) Emirates Air Line (2012) d) Consideration of a longer-term fixed link at Gallions Reach to improve connectivity for local traffic, buses, cyclists and to support economic development in this area e) The encouragement of modal shift from private Overground (East London line, 2010) cars to public transport, using new rail links DLR Woolwich Arsenal (2009) including High Speed One domestic services, HS1 Domestic (Ebbsfleet to Stratford) Crossrail and the DLR extension to Woolwich, DLR/Jubilee line extra capacity reducing road demand, and so road congestion Crossrail (2018) at river crossings, where possible f) Support for Government proposals to Working with DfT on Lower Thames
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investigation Into Reliability of the Jubilee Line
    Investigation into Reliability: London Underground Jubilee Line An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science By Jack Arnis Agolli Marianna Bailey Errando Berwin Jayapurna Yiannis Kaparos Date: 26 April 2017 Report Submitted to: Malcolm Dobell CPC Project Services Professors Rosenstock and Hall-Phillips Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Abstract Metro systems are often faced with reliability issues; specifically pertaining to safety, accessibility, train punctuality, and stopping accuracy. The project goal was to assess the reliability of the London Underground’s Jubilee Line and the systems implemented during the Jubilee Line extension. The team achieved this by interviewing train drivers and Transport for London employees, surveying passengers, validating the stopping accuracy of the trains, measuring dwell times, observing accessibility and passenger behavior on platforms with Platform Edge Doors, and overall train performance patterns. ii Acknowledgements We would currently like to thank everyone who helped us complete this project. Specifically we would like to thank our sponsor Malcolm Dobell for his encouragement, expert advice, and enthusiasm throughout the course of the project. We would also like to thank our contacts at CPC Project Services, Gareth Davies and Mehmet Narin, for their constant support, advice, and resources provided during the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE and the REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER
    TfL RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE AND THE REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER 1. Overview Building upon previous consultations, Transport for London is presently undertaking a public consultation exercise seeking views upon a revised set of options for new crossings of the River Thames east of Silvertown. (A proposed new tunnel under the Thames linking Silvertown with the North Greenwich peninsular has already attracted support and will be the subject of separate consultation later this year). The four options upon which views are now sought comprise: A new modern ferry at Woolwich A ferry service at Gallions Reach A bridge at Gallions Reach A bridge at Belvedere. The location of these options is shown in Appendix A in a separate document accompanying this one. For each separate proposal, views are invited whether respondents Strongly Support/Support/Neither/ Oppose/ Strongly Oppose. The public consultation deadline is 12th September, but Boroughs have been given until 30th September to respond. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to this consultation, summarise broadly the features of the emerging options and to seek a steer on the stance to be followed in LB Redbridge’s formal reply. 2. Background It is important to be aware of previous formal LB Redbridge positions conveyed to TfL in respect of new river crossings proposals. Those stances are summarised in Appendix B to this paper. The salient context surrounding the options now being considered is summarised below: TfL consultation in recent years has yielded support from a majority of respondents to provision of new Thames crossings, with businesses in east and south-east London very supportive.
    [Show full text]
  • Dart Charge Summer Leaflet
    Important information for drivers planning a journey via the Dartford Crossing this summer You no longer pay the Dartford Crossing charge at the barriers. You now pay in advance or by midnight the day after you cross. Dart Charge Important information for drivers using the Dartford Crossing Hateld 7 Chelmsford The way you pay 2 23 1 M25 27 24 25 26 6 To ease congestion and improve A1 Eneld M11 A12 traffic flow at the Dartford Crossing A10 5 Brentwood 28 A406 the way you pay the crossing charge 2 4 A12 A127 29 Basildon has changed. 1 Dagenham M25 A13 A12 A13 You no longer pay the charge at the Dartford 30 Crossing payment barriers. Instead Dart Charge is Blackwall Tunnel Tilbury paid in advance or by midnight the day LONDON A2 Gravesend after crossing. 2 A20 A282 A2 1 3 Rochester 2 Paying Dart Charge is easy. You can Orpington M25 M2 Croydon M20 pay online, by phone, at Payzone retail 4 2 3 4 outlets or in advance by post. You can M26 2a 5 M20 A23 set up a pre-pay account and save up to 7 M25 Sevenoaks 7 A21 8 8 6 a third on every crossing. Reigate © Crown copyright and database rights 2014 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Those who do not pay will face a penalty. The A282 Dartford Crossing Charges apply between 6am to 10pm. links the M25 motorway between Dartford in Kent and Thurrock It is still free to use the Dartford Crossing in Essex. It crosses the River between 10pm and 6am.
    [Show full text]
  • LEATHAMS, 227-255 ILDERTON ROAD South Bermondsey, London SE15 1NS
    LEATHAMS, 227-255 ILDERTON ROAD South Bermondsey, London SE15 1NS Landmark Consented Mixed Use Development Opportunity View of consented scheme from Sharratt Street (Source: Maccreanor Lavington) Leathams, 227-255 Ilderton Road Southwark, London SE15 1NS 2 OPPORTUNITY SUMMARY DESCRIPTION • Landmark mixed use development The site is broadly rectangular in shape and extends to approximately 0.39 hectares (0.96) acres. It is currently occupied by opportunity in South Bermondsey within a three storey industrial warehouse (use class B1 and B8) and used as an industrial food storage and distribution centre (B8) with ancillary office space (B1). The internal area extends to approximately 2,529 sqm (27,222 sq ft) GIA and the two external London Borough of Southwark. loading yards extend to approximately 874 sqm (9,408 sq ft). • 0.39 hectare (0.96) acre site. The table below sets out the existing area schedule: • Existing site comprises an industrial EXISTING INDUSTRIAL SPACE GIA (SQM) GIA (SQ FT) warehouse building with two loading yards Storage (B8) 2,005 21,582 extending to approximately 3,403 (sqm) Ancillary Offices (B1) 523 5,630 36,630 sq ft GIA occupied by Leathams Total Workspace 2,529 27,222 Food Distribution business. Covered loading yard 730 7,858 • Located 800 metres (0.5 miles) south External Plant 144 1,550 of South Bermondsey Overground Total Site Area 3,403 36,630 station, providing regular services to Source: Design & Access Statement Maccreanor Lavington London Bridge (5 minutes), and the wider Underground Network (Northern Line and Jubilee line). • New Bermondsey Overground station scheduled for completion in 2025 located 400 metres to the east of site.
    [Show full text]
  • The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 1117 LONDON GOVERNMENT HIGHWAYS, ENGLAND The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 Made - - - - 10th April 2000 Laid before Parliament 26th April 2000 Coming into force - - 22nd May 2000 The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14A of the Highways Act 1980(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 and shall come into force on 22nd May 2000. Designation of GLA roads 2.—(1) The highways specified in the Schedule to this Order are hereby designated as GLA roads. (2) In accordance with section 14A(2) of the Highways Act 1980 3rd July 2000 is hereby specified as the date on which those highways are to become GLA roads. Interpretation of the Schedule 3. In the Schedule to this Order— (a) a reference to the boundary of London is a reference to the boundary of Greater London; (b) the description of a highway includes the intersection of that road and any other road that crosses it at the same level; and (c) the description of a highway which, or any length of which, is a trunk road includes any highway constructed as part of the trunk road for the purpose of relieving the main carriageway of the trunk road from local traffic. (1) 1980 c. 66; section 14A was inserted by section 260 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • D3 Contract Reference: QC53403 the Date of Tender for This ITT Is
    7. Service Specification Route: D3 Contract Reference: QC53403 This Service Specification forms section 7 of the ITT and should be read in conjunction with the ITT document, Version 1 dated 29 September 2011. You are formally invited to tender for the provision of the bus service detailed below and in accordance with this Service Specification. Tenderers must ensure that a Compliant Tender is submitted and this will only be considered for evaluation if all parts of the Tender documents, as set out in section 11, have been received by the Corporation by the Date of Tender. The Tender must be fully completed in the required format, in accordance with the Instructions to Tenderers. A Compliant Tender must comply fully with the requirements of the Framework Agreement; adhere to the requirements of the Service Specification; and reflect the price of operating the Services with new vehicles. Terminus Points Bethnal Green, London Chest Hospital and Leamouth, Saffron Avenue Contract Basis Incentivised Commencement Date 17th September 2016 Vehicle Type 55 capacity, dual door, single deck, minimum 10.2m long Current Maximum Approved 10.2 metres long and 2.44 metres wide Dimensions New Vehicles Mandatory Yes Hybrid Price Required Yes Sponsored Route No Advertising Rights Operator Minimum Performance Standard Average Excess Wait Time - No more than 1.10 minutes Extension Threshold Average Excess Wait Time Threshold – 1.00 minutes Minimum Operated Mileage No less than 98.00% Standard The Date of Tender for this ITT is: nd No later than 12 Noon on Monday 2 November 2015 Tenderers should refer to section 3 of Part A for the Service Specification Explanatory Notes and Appendix B of section 5 for the Example Service Specification of the ITT document.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Options Investigated to Address the Issues at Blackwall Tunnel
    Alternative options considered to address the issues at the Blackwall Tunnel We have considered a wide range of options for schemes to help address the transport problems of congestion, closures and incidents, and resilience at the Blackwall Tunnel and believe that our proposed Silvertown Tunnel scheme is the best solution. This factsheet examines a number of potential alternative schemes, including some which were suggested by respondents to our previous consultation, and explains why we do not consider them to be feasible solutions to the problems at the Blackwall Tunnel. Further detail on each alternative as well as other alternatives is included in the Preliminary Case for the Scheme, which can be found at www.tfl.gov.uk/Silvertown-tunnel. Building a bridge between Silvertown and the Greenwich Peninsula, rather than a tunnel We have considered building a bridge at Silvertown, instead of a tunnel. However, any new bridge built in east London needs to provide at least 50m of clearance above the water level to allow tall sea-going shipping to pass beneath safely. A bridge with this level of clearance would require long, sloping approach ramps. Such ramps would create a barrier within the local area, as well as dramatically affecting the visual environment and going against local authorities’ development plans. A high-level bridge would also not be feasible in the current location due to it’s proximity to the Emirates Air Line cable car. We also considered the option of a lifting bridge (like Tower Bridge). This could be constructed at a lower level, with less impact on the local area.
    [Show full text]
  • The New River Improvement Project 7Th September 2017 Claudia Innes
    The New River Improvement Project 7th September 2017 Claudia Innes Community Projects Executive Corporate Responsibility Team ∗ Team of 18 - Education, community investment, volunteering and nature reserves ∗ Manage a £6.5 million community investment fund between 2014 and 2019 ∗ Aim to engage customers and communities through: ∗ environmental enhancement ∗ improving access and recreation ∗ educational outreach Governance • All funding applicants apply by form. • All spend is approved in advance by our Charities Committee • A Memorandum Of Understanding is generated to release the funds to the partner. 3 The New River – a brief history ∗ Aqueduct completed in 1613 by Goldsmith and Adventurer Hugh Myddelton and Mathematician Edward Wright. ∗ King James I agreed to provide half the costs on condition he received half of the profits ∗ Total cost of construction was £18,500. ∗ Essential part of London’s water supply. 48 million gallons a day are carried for treatment. The New River – a brief history ∗ Originally fed only by sources at Chadwell and Amwell Springs. ∗ The course of the New River now ends at Stoke Newington East Reservoir (Woodberry Wetlands). ∗ Water levels are regulated by sluices. Path development ∗ The New River Path was developed over 12 years at a cost of over £2 million ∗ 28 miles from Hertfordshire to North London. ∗ We have worked in partnership with, and with the support of, many organisations; including Groundwork, the New River Action Group, Friends of New River Walk, schools and communities, and all the local authorities
    [Show full text]
  • London Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Delivery Plan Supported by the Mayor’S Electric Vehicle Infrastructure June 2019 Taskforce Contents
    London electric vehicle infrastructure delivery plan Supported by The Mayor’s Electric Vehicle Infrastructure June 2019 Taskforce Contents Mayor’s foreword 4 The delivery plan 4.1 Challenges Executive summary 4.2 Guiding principles 1 Introduction and aims 4.3 Defining what is needed 1.1 Introduction 5 What can we do to make 1.2 Supporting policies this happen? towards zero emission 5.1 Facilitate smoother installation 1.3 What London is already and match supply with demand doing to support EV charging infrastructure 5.2 Reduce energy barriers 1.4 The Mayor’s EV 5.3 Share knowledge and maximise Infrastructure Taskforce potential of legislation 2 The current situation 5.4 Charter of commitments in London Glossary 2.1 Electric vehicles 2.2 Charging infrastructure Appendix A – Detailed modelling assumptions and approach 2.3 User experience Appendix B – Principal author: Zero 3 User needs Carbon Futures 3.1 Understanding charging needs 3.2 Modelling potential demand to 2025 we must move away from petrol and There’s no shying away from the fact diesel cars, and towards electric and that expanding our public charge hydrogen vehicles. Bringing about this points will be challenging. London’s sea change won’t be easy, but with land is always in high demand, our the right political will and ambition I’m streets are often narrow and we have confident we can pull it off. to work with 35 different planning authorities. But we know there is a I’m proud that London is one of real appetite to cut harmful emissions the first major cities in the world and propel London towards a greener to publish a detailed and future.
    [Show full text]
  • London City Airport Master Plan 2006
    Master Plan November 2006 Master Plan November 2006 At a more local level, the Airport is a force restrictions we impose will continue. Foreword for regeneration which has not only created Alongside this the opening of the extension jobs and prosperity in the immediate area, of the DLR to the Airport in December but has also helped to spearhead the 2005 means we now have significantly success of landmarks like Canary Wharf improved public transport links with a and ExCel London and drive recent and higher proportion of passengers (49%) future extensions to the Docklands Light accessing the Airport by rail than any other Railway (DLR). UK airport. These links will be strengthened further by the operation of Crossrail in the We are also very well placed to continue future, and LCA is a key supporter of this to drive the economic prosperity flowing project. from the London Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012. Through co-operating with a wide variety of interested bodies, we will seek to further But to do all this, we need to grow. In improve our already good environmental 2003 the Government published its Aviation record concentrating on reducing our White Paper which required all UK airports contribution to climate change and man- to set out master plans to grow through to aging all emissions, particularly waste. In 2030 to meet the increase in passenger addition, we support the aviation industry’s demand. One of the key objectives of this inclusion in the EU Emissions Trading paper was to maximise the use of existing Scheme, which will allow the issue of runways and infrastructure to delay, aviation greenhouse gas emissions to be reduce and in some cases eliminate the effectively and responsibly addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • YPG2EL Newspaper
    THE YOUNG PERSON’S GUIDE TO EAST LONDON East London places they don’t put in travel guides! Recipient of a Media Trust Community Voices award A BIG THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS This organisation has been awarded a Transformers grant, funded by the National Lottery through the Olympic Lottery Distributor and managed by ELBA Café Verde @ Riverside > The Mosaic, 45 Narrow Street, Limehouse, London E14 8DN > Fresh food, authentic Italian menu, nice surroundings – a good place to hang out, sit with an ice cream and watch the fountain. For the full review and travel information go to page 5. great places to visit in East London reviewed by the EY ETCH FO P UN K D C A JA T I E O H N Discover T B 9 teenagers who live there. In this guide you’ll find reviews, A C 9 K 9 1 I N E G C N YO I U E S travel information and photos of over 200 places to visit, NG PEOPL all within the five London 2012 Olympic boroughs. WWW.YPG2EL.ORG Young Persons Guide to East London 3 About the Project How to use the guide ind an East London that won’t be All sites are listed A-Z order. Each place entry in the travel guides. This guide begins with the areas of interest to which it F will take you to the places most relates: visited by East London teenagers, whether Arts and Culture, Beckton District Park South to eat, shop, play or just hang out. Hanging Out, Parks, clubs, sport, arts and music Great Views, venues, mosques, temples and churches, Sport, Let’s youth centres, markets, places of history Shop, Transport, and heritage are all here.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodberry Wetlands (Stoke Newington Reservoirs)
    Woodberry Wetlands (Stoke Newington Reservoirs) 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 29th May 2017 Current status Document last updated Tuesday, 28th August 2018 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: • The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. • Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. • This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. • All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2017-2018, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Woodberry Wetlands (Stoke Newington Reservoirs) Start: Finsbury Park Station Finish: Stoke Newington Overground or Manor House Underground Length: 6.9 km/4.3 mi (Stoke Newington Ending) or 5.0 km/3.1 mi (Manor House Ending) Time: 1 hour 45 mins for the Stoke Newington Ending, 1 hour 15 mins for the Manor House Ending. Transport: Finsbury Park Station is served by Main Line Services from Kings Cross, and by the Victoria and Piccadilly Lines.
    [Show full text]