The Power of the Pipe: a Material Case Study on Hopewell Effigy Pipes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Power of the Pipe: a Material Case Study on Hopewell Effigy Pipes Badame , Anthony The Power of the Pipe The Power of the Pipe: A Material Case Study on Hopewell Effigy Pipes Anthony Badame Abstract The Hopewell were a cultural group of hunter-gatherer-horticulturalists that lived during the Middle Woodland Period, between 1 and 400 CE. The Hopewell culture is famous for their mound sites as well as their effigy pipes. Hopewell effigy pipes played an important role in Hopewell ritual and spirituality. Today, these pipes- are displayed in museum contexts and prized by collectors. Yet, to many contemporary First Nations, the act of collecting these pipes is concerning. This paper examines some of the contemporary issues surrounding the col lecting of these pipes and discusses my own experience trying to create a pipe to better understand its materiality. KeywordsThis conference paper was adapted from a final project for MSL 2360: Museums and Indigenous Communities. Hopewell, effigy, pipe, museums, spirituality, indigenous, collections, ethics Who were the Hopewell? The Hopewell were a cultural group of hunt- per, 2002). These earthworks were used as centres of er-gatherer-horticulturalists that lived during the ceremony and gift-giving that played important roles - in Hopewell life and politics (Miller, 2014; Weets, Carr, Penney, & Carriveau, 2005). The Hopewell were also Middle Woodland Period, between 1 and 400 CE (Lep known for creating effigy pipes (figure 1) (Otto, 1992).- onper, the 2002; economic Seeman, and 2004). ideological Although life theyin the mainly surround lived- This paper looks at the body of knowledge and critical in Ohio and Illinois, the Hopewell had a great impact issues surrounding the pipes, and discusses my experi ence creating an effigy pipe. ing areas (Yerkes, 2002). The Hopewell were involved What is an effigy pipe? in a large trade network of exotic materials (Lepper, such2002). as Archaeologistsclans, were the alsobasis believe of Hopewell that they social lived struc in- - small scattered settlements and that kin-based groups, ana rustica, which is a hallucinogen and can help induce Builders, the Hopewell are famous for creating large trances Anand effigy “altered pipe statesis a pipe of usedconsciousness” for smoking (Brown, Nicoti ture (Byers, 2010). Known historically as The Mound- - earthworks, some of which survive to this day (Lep 2006; Romain, 2009, p. 177). Other plant-based mate Defying Conventions - March 2016 Badame, Anthony The Power of the Pipe - vers, otters, squirrels, turtles, frogs, serpents, rattle- rial may have also been added to the tobacco, including spoon bills, elk, bears, wolves, panthers, racoons, bea bark and scented leaves (Gehlbach, 2006). Due to their pipesunique are design, variations effigy ofpipes Hopewell are diagnostic curve-base objects monitor for snakes, hawks, owls and swallows (Farnsworth, 2004; the Hopewell culture (Romain, 2009). Hopewell effigy Greber & Ruhl, 1989; Henderson, 2004). The Tremper - pipes alone have 27 different genera of animals (West, pipes that have been carved to form an effigy (West, 1970). The vast majority of the animals are ones that 1970). These pipes have a bent base that acts as a plat live within the Eastern Woodlands , yet others instead form for the bowl and as a hand rest (Brown, 2006). reflect animals in areas where the Hopewell’s trade Unlike other smoking pipes, reed or wooden pipe stems network reached (Otto, 1992; Henderson, 2004). were not attached to the pipe; rather the platform acts What context are the they found in? as the stem as well (Brown, 2006). With effigy pipes, the bowl is shaped to look like an animal or human - (Farnsworth, 2004). The creators of the pipes were- - highly skilled and used animals that they were familiar Hopewell effigy pipes are found almost exclu with as models for the effigies (West, 1970). The ani sively in mortuary contexts (Farnsworth, 2004). In mals depicted are incredibly realistic and are often seen terestingly, effigy pipes have been found as far away in natural poses (West, 1970). For example, some of the andas Tunnacunnhee worldview stretched Mound Doutside in Georgia of the (Farnsworth, traditional pipes from Ross County, Ohio include an otter eating a Hopewell2004). This area. demonstrates One of the most that famousHopewell collections influence of fish and a racoon on a tree stump (West, 1970). pipes were those found at Tremper Mound. The mound, Sunderhaus and Blosser (2006) state that the animals depicted in effigy pipes are associated with creation stories of Woodland groups and are linked located in Portsmouth Ohio, was surveyed in the early- associatedto the three-tier with waterworld andsystem. is the The home lower of world,such spirits upon 19th century and excavated in 1915 (Converse, n.d.).- which the middle world (where human’s live) floats, is- mainsThe excavation of a circular was room done in poorly,a multi-room but two building caches made con - sisting of around 80 effigy pipes were found in the re as the great water panther (Lepper, 2010). Water ani mals, such as frogs, depicted on effigy pipes are there notof wood through (Penney, smashing 2004). them, Many but of ratherthese pipesallowing were them not fore also associated with the lower world (Sunderhaus found fully intact but were rather broken intentionally- & Blosser, 2006). The upper world is associated with- the sky and is associated with the many types of birds to violently burst apart via intense heat (Brown, 2006). representfound on the the pipes protective (Lepper, spirits 2010; that Sunderhaus shamans were & Bloss able Many of these pipes have subsequently been put back er, 2006). Brown (2006) hypothesizes that the animals together (Otto, 1992). This ritual breaking of pipes was also seen at Mound City in Ohio in Mound 8 (Brown, to bring back from the spirit world. At least one pipe 2006; Farnsworth, 2004). Squier and Davis found the andfrom is Mound thought City to representdepicts the a faceshaman of a transformingshaman (Romain, into cache consisting of 200 pipes in 1848 near a cremation 2009). The face has both human and cat-like attributes temperaturescontainer (Penney, hot enough 2004; to West, melt the1970). copper According artefacts toin them, the pipes were broken and had been exposed to a panther (Romain, 2009). What types of effigies are found on the pipes? the cache (West, 1970). Both the Tremper Mounds and atMound both Citylocations were wereimportant within locations charnel forhouses the Hopewell(i.e. plac- es(Otto, where 1992). human The remainscaches in were which stored the pipes and inwere this found case Various effigies are found on Hopewell pipes. Although not as common, human effigies have been cremated) (Otto, 1992). However, some pipes are found found on Hopewell Pipes (Farnsworth, 2004; Romain, in individual burials of both sexes of a variety of ages 2009). More often than not, the effigies are of animals. (Otto, 1992; Snyder, 2004). Since the pipes are etched in such detail, researchers have been able to identify specific species of animals (Otto, 1992). These include, but are not limited to, Defying Conventions - March 2016 Badame, Anthony The Power of the Pipe Who used them/made them and how were they used? effigy touches the nose of the smoker when the pipe is being used (BBC, 2010). For many contemporary First Nations cultures, air and breath are associated with life The makers of the effigy pipes were highly (Romain, 2009). It is thus thought that when a shaman- skilled. Otto (1992, p. 5) states that the crafter of these- breathed in the smoke of the pipe he/she was mixing pipes knew exactly what they were doing and did not- his/her breath, and thus life, with that of the effigy (Ro have any “false starts”, or “practice pieces.” Most schol spiritsmain, 2009). together. The Thereverse shaman occurs could when then the shaman get abilities blew believedars believe to thathave Hopewell had leadership effigy pipesroles inwere Hopewellian made ex frominto the the pipe animal (Romain, and, depending 2009). This on thus the mergesneed of thea situa two- clusively for rituals and used by shamans. Shamans are couldsociety commune due to their with ability spirits to conduct and were rituals believed (Gehlbach, to be alsotion, giveshamans advice could during call timeson a different of trouble, spirit such by usingas war a 2006; Brown, 2006). These shamans were healers, different effigy pipe (Romain, 2009). The spirits could able to transform into animals (Brown, 2006; Romain, (Otto, 1992). 2009). What are they made from? Various theories exist as to the precise use of- niesthe pipes. in order The to pipes help may the soulshave beenleave smoked this world by variousfor an- members of the community during funerary ceremo were not created from pipestone from one source, as of the pipe could have also been used to “manipulate Research has concluded that most of the pipes- other (Gehlbach, 2006). Through trances, the smoking- vealed that the Tremper pipes alone come from at least previously believed. Instead, chemical analysis has re- time”, whereby the user could go into the past to con ers believe that each source represents a different social nect with ancestors (Gehlbach, 2006, p. 131). Many groupthree sources coming (Weets to the siteet al., to 2005). deposit As their a result, pipes research (Weets archaeologists believe that breaking the pipes through- ritual, as seen at Tremper Mound and Mound City’s - becameMound 8, polluted allowed andthe spiritneeded of theto be pipe gotten to be ridkilled of (Geas a sinet al., concluded 2005). An that x-ray the diffraction pipes were analysis made byof MinnesotaBoszhardt hlbach, 2006). This was needed as the pipes themselves and Gundersen (2003) of Hopewell pipes from Wiscon their spirits would return to the underworld and could have been imported to the Eastern Woodlands, via alsoform act of aspurification an offering (Giles, to the 2010).
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Community: Microwear Analysis of Blades at the Mound House Site
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 4-16-2019 Understanding Community: Microwear Analysis of Blades at the Mound House Site Silas Levi Chapman Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Chapman, Silas Levi, "Understanding Community: Microwear Analysis of Blades at the Mound House Site" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 1118. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1118 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING COMMUNITY: MICROWEAR ANALYSIS OF BLADES AT THE MOUND HOUSE SITE SILAS LEVI CHAPMAN 89 Pages Understanding Middle Woodland period sites has been of considerable interest for North American archaeologists since early on in the discipline. Various Middle Woodland period (50 BCE-400CE) cultures participated in shared ideas and behaviors, such as constructing mounds and earthworks and importing exotic materials to make objects for ceremony and for interring with the dead. These shared behaviors and ideas are termed by archaeologists as “Hopewell”. The Mound House site is a floodplain mound group thought to have served as a “ritual aggregation center”, a place for the dispersed Middle Woodland communities to congregate at certain times of year to reinforce their shared identity. Mound House is located in the Lower Illinois River valley within the floodplain of the Illinois River, where there is a concentration of Middle Woodland sites and activity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Newark Earthworks Center - Ohio State University and World Heritage - Ohio Executive Committee INDIANS and EARTHWORKS THROUGH the AGES “We Are All Related”
    Welcoming the Tribes Back to Their Ancestral Lands Marti L. Chaatsmith, Comanche/Choctaw Newark Earthworks Center - Ohio State University and World Heritage - Ohio Executive Committee INDIANS AND EARTHWORKS THROUGH THE AGES “We are all related” Mann 2009 “We are all related” Earthen architecture and mound building was evident throughout the eastern third of North America for millennia. Everyone who lived in the woodlands prior to Removal knew about earthworks, if they weren’t building them. The beautiful, enormous, geometric precision of the Hopewell earthworks were the culmination of the combined brilliance of cultures in the Eastern Woodlands across time and distance. Has this traditional indigenous knowledge persisted in the cultural traditions of contemporary American Indian cultures today? Mann 2009 Each dot represents Indigenous architecture and cultural sites, most built before 1491 Miamisburg Mound is the largest conical burial mound in the USA, built on top of a 100’ bluff, it had a circumference of 830’ People of the Adena Culture built it between 2,800 and 1,800 years ago. 6 Miamisburg, Ohio (Montgomery County) Picture: Copyright: Tom Law, Pangea-Productions. http://pangea-productions.net/ Items found in mounds and trade networks active 2,000 years ago. years 2,000 active networks trade and indicate vast travel Courtesy of CERHAS, Ancient Ohio Trail Inside the 50-acre Octagon at Sunrise 8 11/1/2018 Octagon Earthworks, Newark, OH Indigenous people planned, designed and built the Newark Earthworks (ca. 2000 BCE) to cover an area of 4 square miles (survey map created by Whittlesey, Squier, and Davis, 1837-47) Photo Courtesy of Dan Campbell 10 11/1/2018 Two professors recover tribal knowledge 2,000 years ago, Indigenous people developed specialized knowledge to construct the Octagon Earthworks to observe the complete moon cycle: 8 alignments over a period of 18 years and 219 days (18.6 years) “Geometry and Astronomy in Prehistoric Ohio” Ray Hively and Robert Horn, 1982 Archaeoastronomy (Supplement to Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologists Solve a 40-Year-Old Mystery? 2 Lay of the Land
    INTERPRETING MISSISSIPPIAN ART • CONFRONTING A CONUNDRUM • JEFFERSON’S RETREAT american archaeologyFALL 2005 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 9 No. 3 MesaMesa VVerde’serde’s ANCIENTANCIENT WAWATERWORKSTERWORKS $3.95 Archaeological Tours led by noted scholars Invites You to Journey Back in Time Jordan (14 days) Libya (20 days) Retrace the route of Nabataean traders Tour fabulous classical cities including Leptis with Dr.Joseph A.Greene,Harvard Magna,Sabratha and Cyrene,as well as the Semitic Museum.We’ll explore pre-Islamic World Heritage caravan city Gadames,with ruins and desert castles,and spend a Sri Lanka (18 days) our scholars.The tour ends with a four-day week in and around Petra visiting its Explore one of the first Buddhist adventure viewing prehistoric art amidst tombs and sanctuaries carved out of kingdoms with Prof.Sudharshan the dunes of the Libyan desert. rose-red sandstone. Seneviratne,U.of Peradeniya. Discover magnificent temples and Ancient Capitals palaces,huge stupas and colorful of China (17 days) rituals as we share the roads Study China’s fabled past with Prof. with elephants and walk in Robert Thorp,Washington U., the footsteps of kings. as we journey from Beijing’s Imperial Palace Ethiopia and Eritrea (19 days) and Suzhou’s exquisite Delve into the intriguing history of gardens to Shanghai.We’ll Africa’s oldest empires with Dr. visit ancient shrines,world-class Mattanyah Zohar,Hebrew U.Visit ancient museums,Xian’s terra-cotta Axumite cities,Lalibela’s famous rock-cut warriors and the spectacular churches,Gondar’s medieval castles,and Longman Buddhist grottoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologist Volume 41 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 41 NO. 4 FALL 1991 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of January as follows: Regular membership $15.00; husband and TERM wife (one copy of publication) $16.00; Life membership $300.00. A.S.O. OFFICERS EXPIRES Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included President James G. Hovan, 16979 South Meadow Circle, in the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an Strongsville, OH 44136, (216) 238-1799 incorporated non-profit organization. Vice President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 BACK ISSUES Exec. Sect. Barbara Motts, 3435 Sciotangy Drive, Columbus, OH 43221, (614) 898-4116 (work) (614) 459-0808 (home) Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $ 6.00 SE, East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 5.00 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 OH 43068, (614)861-0673 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH Back issues—black and white—each $ 5.00 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues—four full color plates—each $ 5.00 Immediate Past Pres. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614) 653-9477 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are generally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • FREE Trial Issue (PDF)
    ANCIENTANCIENTANCIENT AMERICANAMERICANAMERICAN© ArchaeologyArchaeology ofof thethe AmericasAmericas BeforeBefore ColumbusColumbus A Mysterious Discovery Beneath the Serpent’s Head Burrows Cave Marble Stone isIs RecentlyRecently Carved Copper Ingots Manufactured in Louisiana Stonehenge Compared to the Earthworks of the Ohio Burial Mounds of the Upper Mississippi Glozel Tablets Reviewed DDwwaarrffiissmm Ancient Waterways Revealed on Burrows Cave iinn AAnncciieenntt Mapstone MMeessooAAmmeerriiccaa VVooll..uummee 1144 •• IIssssuuee NNuummbbeerr 8899 •• $$77..9955 1993-94 Ancient American Six Issues in Original Format Now Available: 1 thru 6 • AA#1. Petroglyphs of Gorham • AA#2. Burrows Cave: Fraud or Find of the Century • AA#3. Stones of Atlantis • AA#4. Face of Asia • AA#5. Archives of the Past: Stone, Clay, Copper • AA#6. Vikings Any 2 for $30.00 + 2.50 $19.95 ea. plus 2.50 post Windows and MacIntosh Two or more $15.00 ea. 1994-95 Ancient American Six Issues in Original Format Now Available: 7 thru 12 • AA#7. Ruins of Comalcalco • AA#8. Ancient Egyptians Sail to America • AA#9. Inca Stone • AA#10. Treasure of the Moche Lords • AA#11. The Kiva: Gateway for Man • AA#12. Ancient Travelers to the Americas All 3 for $45.00 + 3.00 $19.95 ea. plus 2.50 post Two or more $15.00 ea. Windows and MacIntosh Mystic Symbol Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders The largest archaeological tragedy in the history of the USA. Starting in the 1840’s, over 10,000 artifacts removed from the earth by pioneers clearing the land in Michigan. Stone, Clay and Copper tablets with a multitude of everyday objects, tools and weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenford Stone “Fort” and Other Stone Constructions in Ohio and Beyond
    GLENfoRD STONE “FORT” AND OTHER STONE CONSTRUCTIONS IN OHIO AND BEYOND Norman Muller When we think of the ancient history of Ohio, the tant study of aboriginal stone wall sites in Georgia and Mound Builders come to mind, particularly the spec- neighboring states, listed six stone wall sites in Ohio, tacular geometric earthen mounds that the Hopewell four of which were built with a mixture of earth and Indians constructed two thousand years ago in and stone. They were: Butler County site near the Great around the town of Newark. Except for the Great Miami River, Miami County site on the left bank of Circle and the Octagon, the latter of which is part of the Great Miami River, Fort Hill, and the Spruce Hill a municipal golf course and was preserved because of Works. Two other sites did not make Smith’s list: the it, nearly all of the other features within Newark and Stone Fort on Flint Ridge, and the Pollock Site. First, beyond were obliterated in the nineteenth century for though, let us look at Spruce Hill Works and Fort Hill agricultural purposes. Less well known are those struc- in a bit more detail: tures and walls built completely of stone or a composite Spruce Hill Works in Ross County (Figure 1) is a of earth and stone. Glenford “Fort” was constructed en- large 140-acre hilltop with a two-and-a-quarter mile long tirely of stone, and it is the main subject of this paper. stone wall around the perimeter, which was originally But we find other structures in Ohio also built of stone, some wholly and others partly.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Projects at Serpent Mound State Memorial
    NEW DEAL, NEW SERPENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS AT SERPENT MOUND STATE MEMORIAL Rory Krupp Abstract Archival research has identified documents at the Ohio History Connection related to Serpent Mound archaeology. The current understanding of the site is that Frederic W. Putnam restored Serpent Mound in the 1880s and converted the surrounding property into a public park. The Ohio History Connection’s State Archives series and New Deal agency records indicate that the Serpent Mound was again restored in 1934–1935. Consequently, today’s Serpent Mound and its surrounding landscape are in reality a New Deal construct based largely on landscaping principles developed by the National Park Service in the 1920s and 1930s. Depression-era agencies’ financial prioritization on wages and not materials seems to indicate that fill used in the restoration originated in the park to save money and may have been associ- ated with restroom construction in 1934–1935. Consequently, the Fort Ancient Baum Focus material located in the Serpent Mound appears to originate from elsewhere within the park and is in the mound as a result of the New Deal restoration. Background suffered from wandering cattle and looters who failed to backfill while looking for artifacts. These Serpent Mound was first recorded by actions, exacerbated by rain, had promoted the Ephraim G. Squier and Dr. Edwin Davis in 1846, mound’s erosion. and it was included in their Ancient Monuments Prompted by Putnam, who was alarmed by the of the Mississippi Valley in 1848 (Squier and Da- mound’s rapid deflation, a group of Boston soci- vis 1848).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Program + Abstracts
    SUMMARY SCHEDULE MORNING AFTERNOON EVENING Fort Ancient Roundtable Opening Session OHS Reception 8–12 (Marion Rm) Ohio Earthworks, 1–4 Exhibit: Following (Delaware Rm) in Ancient Exhibits Footsteps , 5–7 THURS 12–5 (Morrow Rm) (shuttles begin at 4 at North Entrance) Exhibits Exhibits Student/Professional 8–12 (Morrow Rm) 12–5 (Morrow Rm) Mixer Symposia and Papers Symposia and Papers 5–9 (Barley’s Earthen Enclosures, 8:15– Woodland-Mississippi Underground) 11:45 (Fairfield Rm) Valley, 1:30–3:30 Late Prehist. Oneota, 8:30– (Fairfield Rm) 10:30 (Knox Rm) Late Prehist. -Ohio Valley Historic, 8–11 am (Marion & Michigan, 1:30–5 Rm) (Knox Rm) Late Prehistoric, 10:45–12 Woodland Mounds & (Knox Rm) Earthworks, 1:30–4 Posters (Marion Rm) FRIDAY Midwestern Archaeology, 9– Late Woodland – Ohio 12 (Fayette Rm) Valley, Michigan & MAC Executive Board Meeting Ontario, 3:45-5:00 12–1:30 (Nationwide B Rm) (Fairfield Rm) Posters Midwestern Archaeology, 1:30–4:30 (Fayette Rm) Student Workshop Getting the Job, 4:15–5:30 (Marion Rm) Exhibits Exhibits Reception and Cash 8–12 (Morrow Rm) 12–5 (Morrow Rm) Bar Symposia and Papers Symposia and Papers 5:30–7 (Franklin Ohio Archaeology, 8–11:15 Woodland -Ohio Valley Rm) (Fairfield Rm) and Michigan, 1:30–4 Banquet and Speaker Paleoindian & Archaic, (Fairfield Rm) 7–9 (Franklin Rm) 8:15–10:00 (Knox Rm) RIHA Project, 1:30–3:30 CRM, 9–12 (Marion Rm) (Knox Rm) Aztalan Structure, 10:15– Late Prehistoric -Upper SATURDAY 11:45 (Knox Rm) Mississippi Valley, 1:30– Posters 3:30 (Marion Rm) Angel Mounds, 9–12 Posters (Fayette Rm) Fort Ancient (Guard Site), OAC Business Meeting 1:30–4:30 (Fayette Rm) 11:15–12 (Fairfield Rm) MAC Business Meeting 4:15–5:15 (Fairfield Rm) Hopewell Earthworks Bus Tour 8 am–4 pm (meet at North Entrance of the hotel) SUN ~ 2 ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Schedule ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining “Law-Stuff” at the Newark Earthworks
    WINNIFRED FALLERS SULLIVAN Imagining “Law-Stuff” at the Newark Earthworks or those who primarily study the earthbound works of people living today or in the relatively recent past through their F written words, the Newark Earthworks initially presents an un- deniably awesome but frustratingly silent landscape. Who were these workers of the earth who looked to the skies? How might we conjure their lives? How might we, like our nineteenth-century spiritualist ancestors, make the dead speak and tell us their secrets? What does it mean for our work when all of the words are supplied by us, not by them? Who can speak for them? As one reads the work of archaeologists and astronomers, views efforts to reconstruct an understanding of the earthworks in their own time, and listens to current would-be representatives of those builders, a possible inter- locutor emerges out of the mists of time — and the miracle of contemporary video technology — to populate our imagination. We are invited by the as- tronomers to stand on Observatory Mound in the avatar of a native inhab- itant and imagine ourselves in another world — some two millennia ago — a world that is visible to us today principally in the traces of massive earthen constructions with their seductively precise astronomical alignments.1 We are led to see this iconic figure, the shaman, as the natural denizen of the space and the natural leader of his people.2 A local Ohio reporter describes a recent visit to the Great Circle: “On this mound, a Native American shaman might have stood above drums drum- ming and rattles rattling and hundreds of people standing in the earthen circle below, all waiting for the moon to rise beyond the circle, beyond the adjoining octagonal mound, ascending above the horizon.”3 We were intro- duced to the shaman first at the Octagon, but now he has moved to the Great Circle — as though he is the only individuated human who can be imagined being in this place.4 Newark.
    [Show full text]
  • Havana Tradition Platform Pipe Production and Disposition: Implications for Interpreting Regional Variation in Midwestern Hopewell Ceremonialism
    ARTICLE Havana Tradition Platform Pipe Production and Disposition: Implications for Interpreting Regional Variation in Midwestern Hopewell Ceremonialism Kenneth B. Farnsworth, Thomas E. Emerson , and Randall E. Hughes This study documentsthe contexts of platform pipe creation, distribution, and disposition at Illinois Havana Hopewell Tradition (50 BCtoAD 200–250)sitesto identify regional variationin Hopewell ceremonialism and exchange.We observe that the largedeposits of stonepipes buriedduringcommunal rituals in the Scioto Valleyand the continued influence of the Hopewell Sphere of Interaction have skewed archaeological interpretation. Aside from the several large deposits, pipes are limited in the Scioto Tradition and sel- dom found in habitation areas. In Illinois, pipe fabrication debris commonlyoccurs in habitation areas along with numerous exam- ples of pipe repair and maintenance. Local pipestones—often from northern Illinois Sterling deposits—predominate, and exotic importedpipestonesareunusual.Pipesarerareinclusionswithindividualburialsasindicatorsofstatus,spiritualprowess,achieve- ment, or group membership. The high value placed on pipes as communal sacra in Ohio and their value in Illinois as items of per- sonalinfluenceparallelstheircommon occurrenceinIllinoisandtheiruniquecontextin Ohio Hopewell.This studyofthecontextsof pipe manufacture and deposition reinforces current discussions of such artifact assemblages as important in documenting local variations in political, social, and religious mortuary ceremonialism across the
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologist Volume 50 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 50 NO. 2 SPRING 2000 PUBLISHED BY THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of TERM January as follows: Regular membership $20.00; husband and wife (one copy EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS of publication) $21.00; Individual Life Membership $300. Husband and wife Life Membership $500. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published 2000 Interim President Carmel "Bud" Tackett, 906 Charleston Pike, quarterly, is included in the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of Chillicothe, OH 45601 (740) 772-5431. Ohio is an incorporated non-profit organization. 2000 Vice President Walt Sperry, 6910 Range Line Road, BACK ISSUES Mt. Vernon, OH (740) 393-2314. Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: 2000 Treasurer Gary Kapusta, 3294 Herriff Rd., Ravenna, OH 44266 Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $40.00 add $4.50 P-H 2287, (330) 296-2287. Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 2000 Executive Secretary Len Weidner, 13706 Robins Road, Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H Westerville, OH 43081 (740) 965-2868. The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse$20.00 add $2.50 P-H 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H 2002 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43064, (614)873-5471. 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 2000 Technical Advisor Jane Weidner, 13706 Robins Road, Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ Westerville, OH 43081, (740) 965-2868.
    [Show full text]