BAPPENAS Ministry of Public Works Ministry of Agriculture State Ministry of Environment Ministry of Health Ministry of Forestry
Program Administration Memorandum (PAM) Volume 3 - Supplementary Appendixes
Project Number: 37049 Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) Number 0027 Loans: 2500 - INO OCR (Registration Number: 10788801) 2501 - INO ADF (Registration Number: 10789501) Technical Assistance 7189 - INO Global Environment Facility Grant 2 September 2009
Republic of Indonesia: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program
The program administration memorandum is an active document, progressively updated and revised as necessary, particularly following any changes in project or program costs, scope, or implementation arrangements. This document, however, may not reflect the latest project or program changes.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 19 June 2008)
Currency Unit – Indonesian rupiah (IDR) IDR1.00 = $0.00011 $1.00 = IDR 9,300
IMPORTANT NOTE
ALL COSTS AND DETAILS PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE INDICATIVE AND ANNUAL WORK PLANS WILL SUPPERCEED.
ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ADF – Asian Development Fund AMAP – adaptation and mitigation action plan AWP – annual work plan BAPPENAS – National Planning and Development Agency BBWSC – Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum BER – bid evaluation report BPKP – Badan Pengawasan Keuangan and Pembangunan CCAM – climate change adaptation and mitigation CDD – community driven development CRB – Citarum River basin CSO – civil society organization CSP – country strategy and program CSR – corporate social responsibility DGSP – Directorate General of Spatial Planning DGWR – Directorate General of Water Resources DMF – design and monitoring framework DMI – domestic, manufacturing, and industrial DWRI Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation DWRM Directorate of Water Resources Management EA – executing agency EARF – environmental assessment and review framework EIA – environmental impact assessment EIRR – economic internal rate of return FFA – framework financing agreement FMS – financial management system GDP – gross domestic product GEF – Global Environmental Facility GIS – geographic information system GOI – Governement of Indonesia IA – implementing agency ICB – international competitive bidding IDR – iindonesian rupiah IEE – initial environmental examination IMEU – independent monitoring and evaluation unit IP – investment program IPPMS – investment program performance management system IPS – international person staff IWRM – integrated water resources management JSM – Java spatial model
LIBOR – London interbank offered rate LIFS – loan information financial system MCV – model conservation village MDG – Millennium Development Goal MFF – multitranche financing facility MIS – management information system MOA – Ministry of Agriculture MOE – Ministry of Environment MOF – Ministry of Finance MOFr – Ministry of Forestry MOH – Ministry of Health MPW – Ministry of Public Works NCB – national competitive bidding NGO – non government organization NPS – national person staff NSCWR – National Steering Committee for Water Resources OCR – ordinary capital resources PA – protected area PCMU – program coordination and management unit PFR – periodic financing request PIU – project implementation unit PJT 2 – Perum Jasa Tirta 2 (CRB operator) PPTA – project preparation technical assistance RBO – river basin organization RCMU – road map coordination and management unit RCWR – Research Center for Water Resources RDA – Research Development Agency RP – resettlement plan RPMS – road map performance management system SEA – strategic environmental assessment SOE – statement of expenditure SRC – staff review committee SRI – system rice intensification TA – technical assistance TACC – technical assistance coordination committee USD – United States Dollar WFPF – Water Financing Partnership Facility WRC – water resources council WRM – water resources management WTC – West Tarum Canal ADB – Asian Development Bank ADF – Asian Development Fund AMAP – adaptation and mitigation action plan AWP – annual work plan BAPPENAS – National Planning and Development Agency BBWSC – Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum BER – bid evaluation report BPKP – Badan Pengawasan Keuangan and Pembangunan CCAM – climate change adaptation and mitigation CDD – community driven development CRB – Citarum River basin CSO – civil society organization
CSP – country strategy and program CSR – corporate social responsibility DGSP – Directorate General of Spatial Planning DGWR – Directorate General of Water Resources DMF – design and monitoring framework DMI – domestic, manufacturing, and industrial DWRI Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation DWRM Directorate of Water Resources Management EA – executing agency EARF – environmental assessment and review framework EIA – environmental impact assessment EIRR – economic internal rate of return FFA – framework financing agreement FMS – financial management system GDP – gross domestic product GEF – Global Environmental Facility GIS – geographic information system GOI – Governement of Indonesia IA – implementing agency ICB – international competitive bidding IDR – iindonesian rupiah IEE – initial environmental examination IMEU – independent monitoring and evaluation unit IP – investment program IPPMS – investment program performance management system IPS – international person staff IWRM – integrated water resources management JSM – Java spatial model LIBOR – London interbank offered rate LIFS – loan information financial system MCV – model conservation village MDG – Millennium Development Goal MFF – multitranche financing facility MIS – management information system MOA – Ministry of Agriculture MOE – Ministry of Environment MOF – Ministry of Finance MOFr – Ministry of Forestry MOH – Ministry of Health MPW – Ministry of Public Works NCB – national competitive bidding NGO – non government organization NPS – national person staff NSCWR – National Steering Committee for Water Resources OCR – ordinary capital resources PA – protected area PCMU – program coordination and management unit PFR – periodic financing request PIU – project implementation unit PJT 2 – Perum Jasa Tirta 2 (CRB operator) PPTA – project preparation technical assistance RBO – river basin organization
RCMU – road map coordination and management unit RCWR – Research Center for Water Resources RDA – Research Development Agency RP – resettlement plan RPMS – road map performance management system SEA – strategic environmental assessment SOE – statement of expenditure SRC – staff review committee SRI – system rice intensification TA – technical assistance TACC – technical assistance coordination committee USD – United States Dollar WFPF – Water Financing Partnership Facility WRC – water resources council WRM – water resources management WTC – West Tarum Canal
GLOSSARY integrated water resources – IWRM is a process to promote coordinated development and management (IWRM)1 management of water, land and related resources in river basins, to maximize the economic benefits and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems. IWRM therefore focuses on delivering a triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental benefits that result from an integrated approach. river basin organization – A general term referring to any government organization with a (RBO) mandate in water resources development and/or management with responsibilities covering a single or group of rivers. balai besar – A central government river basin organization with a broad mandate (Balai Besar Wilayah that includes aspects of water resource planning, development and Sungai Citarum-BBWSC) management operating within a defined river basin territorial area covering either a single large river catchment or group of smaller river catchments. BBWSC operates in the Citarum River Basin territory. 6 Ci’s River Basin Territory – River basin territory comprising three river basin organizations Balai (see Map 1) Besar Citarum, Balai Besar Ciliwung-Cisadane, and Balai Besar Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian located in West Java, DKI-Jakarta, and Banten Provinces, and including the metropolitan conurbation of Jabodetabek as shown in Map 1. Perum Jasa Tirta II – State owned corporation with a water infrastructure management (PJT-II) mandate, operating in the Citarum River Basin District or local government – The third tier of government below, although independent from, provincial and national governments Regional government – General term referring to provincial and/or district governments Roadmap – The Roadmap is essentially a strategically planned program of interventions that will, if successfully implemented by stages, lead to the achievement of the agreed vision through stakeholder consultations Jabodetabek – The greater Jakarta metropolitan area known as (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi) and its surrounding area Pola – A water resources management strategic plan which is the basic framework for planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation for water resources conservation, utilization and control. Rencana – A comprehensive and integrated water resources management plan required for the implementation of water resources management. Tugas Pembantuan or Co- An assignment from (i) the central government to a region and/or a administered Task district, (ii) the provincial government to a district/city, with the obligation to report and account for the implementation of the assignment to the central government or the provincial government.
1ADB. 2006. Water Financing Program 2006-2010 Helping to Introduce IWRM in 25 River Basins in the Asia-Pacific Region. Manila. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Water/WFP/basin.asp#4
(i)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Resettlement Framework 2. Environmental Assessment and Review Framework 3. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy 4. Detailed Activities and Schedule for Project 1 Sub Components 5. Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Components (Costab Ouputs)
Supplementary Appendix 1 - Resettlement Framework
Resettlement Framework
37049-INO 08 August 2008
INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program
Directorate General Water Resources Ministry of Public Works
1 Contents List
I. INTRODUCTION ...... 7 A. GENERAL BACKGROUND...... 7 B. ADB ROADMAP SUPPORT...... 10 C. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT ...... 12 D. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE RF ...... 14 II. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK...... 16 A. RELEVANT LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA ...... 16 B. ADB POLICIES ON INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT ...... 17 C. ADB POLICIES RELEVENT TO RESETTLEMENT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION...... 18 D. GAPS OF INDONESIAN LAWS AND COMPARISON WITH ADB POLICIES19 III. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ...... 21 A. OBJECTIVES ...... 21 B. PRINCIPLES ...... 21 C. CUT-OFF DATE OF ELIGIBILITY ...... 23 D. PRINCIPLE OF REPLACEMENT COST...... 24 IV. PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ...... 25 V. RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION STRATEGY ...... 31 A. RELOCATION STRATEGY...... 31 B. LIVELIHOOD/INCOME RESTORATION STRATEGY...... 31 VI. RP PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION...... 32 A. INITIAL SCREENING ...... 32 B. COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT (CDD)...... 34 C. RP PREPARATION...... 35 D. RP IMPLEMENTATION...... 36 VII. VULNERABILITY, GENDER, AND ETHNICITY ISSUES...... 36 VIII. CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE...... 38 IX. GRIEVANCE REDRESS ...... 38 X. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ...... 40 A. EXECUTING AND IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES ...... 40 XI. MONITORING ...... 46 A. INTERNAL MONITORING ...... 46 B. EXTERNAL MONITORING ...... 47 XII. RP BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION ...... 48
i Appendices
Appendix 1: List of potential subprojects with land acquisition and resettlement impacts Appendix 1 Maps of the Project Area Appendix 2: List of consultation meetings for the WTC rehabilitation RP Appendix 3 Indicative ICWRMIP Program Appendix 4 Format and Scope of a full RP and a short RP Appendix 5 Socio-economic Survey Instrument Used in WTC Appendix 6 Resettlement Plan for the WTC
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Population and Households in Citarum River Basin, 2004 Table 1.2 Indicative ICWRMIP Outputs Table 1.3 Tranche 1 Outputs Table 4.1 Entitlement Matrix Table 6.1 Screening Questions for Resettlement Categorization Table 6.2 Surveys for RP Preparation
ii
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank AH Affected Household BAPPEDA Provincial / District Development Planning Agency BAPPENAS National Development Planning Agency COI Corridor of Impact RF Resettlement Framework DMS Detailed Measurement Survey EA Executing Agency EMA External Monitoring Agency ETC East Tarum Canal ICWRMIP Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program IA Implementing Agency IOL inventory of losses km kilometer LAC Land Acquisition Committee (Panitia Sembilan or Committee of Nine) LRP Livelihood Restoration Program m2 square meter MFF Multitranche Financing Facility NJOP Nilai Jual Object Pajak (Tax Object Selling Price NTC North Tarum Canal NTP Notice to Proceed PIB Project Information Booklet PJT II Perusahaan Umum Jasa Tirta II (WTC operator) PIU Project Implementation Unit PIC Project Implementing Consultant RCS Replacement Cost Study ROW Right-of-Way RF Resettlement Framework RP Resettlement Plan RWG Resettlement Working Group SES Social and Environmental Section TOR Terms of Reference WTC West Tarum Canal
NOTE
In this report, "$" refers to US dollars
iii Definition of Terms
Affected person (AP) - Refers to any person or persons, household, firm, private or public institution that, on account of changes resulting from the Project, will have its (i) standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title or interest in any house, land (including residential, commercial, agricultural, forest and/or grazing land), water resources or any other moveable or fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business, occupation, place of work or residence or habitat adversely affected, with or without displacement. In the case of affected household, it includes all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by a project or any of its components. Adat This refers to the customary law that governed land ownership prior to the promulgation of the 1960 Basic Agrarian Law (BAL). Usually un-surveyed, un- registered and untitled, ownership over a piece of property was based on community acceptance of boundaries and claims. The 1960 Basic Agrarian Law has since systematized the procedures for documenting and perfecting claims over land; however, the BAL recognizes and protects rights acquired under the adat prior to the promulgation of the 1960 Basic Agrarian Law. (See related concepts: Hak Milik, Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Pakai, and Loss of Land Use)
Construction Works Zone A CWZ shall be a designated zone defined during detailed design and clearly (CWZ) identified in the RP update that will divide the canal/river into convenient stretches for construction implementation. Corridor of Impact (COI) It is the area which is impacted by civil works in the implementation of any subproject of the ICWRMIP, such as the rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal, and is important in two particular respects: (a) Legally as the area within which AHs will be entitled to compensation and other measures (in general coming under the heading of resettlement) for any loss of land, structures or land use and occupation and of livelihoods and (b) Operationally as the agreed and demarcated area within which construction activities will take place.
Cut-off date - This refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorized as AP. Persons not covered in the census are not eligible for compensation and other entitlements, unless they can show proof that (i) they have been inadvertently missed out during the census and the IOL; or (ii) they have lawfully acquired the affected assets following completion of the census and the IOL and prior to the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS). Detailed Measurement Survey - With the aid of the approved detailed engineering design, this activity involves the (DMS) finalization and/or validation of the results of the inventory of losses (IOL), severity of impacts, and list of APs earlier done during RP preparation. The final cost of resettlement can be determined following completion of the DMS.
Encroacher Encroacher is a person who has legal title to land but illegally extends his legal holding onto the public land
Entitlement - Refers to a range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration support, transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which are due to the APs, depending on the type and severity of their losses, to restore their economic and social base. Hak Guna Usaha and Hak Hak guna usaha or right of exploitation, and hak pakai or right of use, are land use Pakai rights given by the State to individuals or corporations for a specific use and exploitation of a property or tract of land. These rights have limitations, such as time- bound, and are governed by specific conditions from the State.
Hak Milik This is the right of ownership, and under applicable land laws of Indonesia (i.e., Basic Agrarian Law of 1960, Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993, Presidential Decree No. 36 of 2005, and Presidential Decree No. 65 of 2006), it is the most complete form of individual land right (hak atas tanah). The right has no time limit, and the owner can convey the whole right, or convey a secondary interest such as a lease right; it can
iv also be used as a security. This right is covered by a certificate (sertipikat) as evidence of title over the property. Acquisition of hak milik rights is only possible for Indonesian citizens. Corporations, whether Indonesian or foreign, cannot have hak milik rights.
Host community - Means the community already in residence at a proposed resettlement or relocation site. House-cum-store Locally referred to as “ruko”, this refers to a main structure (i.e., building) that is used principally for residence but at the same time has a mini-grocery or store inside the building or attached to it.
Independent Shops
These are main structures (i.e., buildings) that are used principally for commerce (locally referred to as “toko”), like groceries, vulcanizing shops (tambal ban), tailoring shops, beauty parlor, karaoke bar, and similar establishments. A related term is “House-cum-store”.
Income restoration - This is the re-establishment of sources of income and livelihood of the affected households. Inventory of Losses (IOL) - This is the process where all fixed assets (i.e., lands used for residence, commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the Project right-of-way (ROW) are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs calculated. Additionally, the severity of impact to the affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood and productive capacity of APs will be determined. Land acquisition - Refers to the process whereby an individual, household, firm or private institution is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency for public purposes in return for compensation at replacement costs. Relocation - This is the physical relocation of an AP from her/his pre-project place of residence and/or business. Replacement cost - This is the amount calculated before displacement which is needed to replace an affected asset as follows: (i) Productive land (Agricultural, fishpond, garden, forest) based on market prices that reflect recent land sales, and in the absence of such recent sales, based on productive value; (ii) Residential land based on market prices that reflect recent land sales or, and in the absence of such recent land sales, based on similar location attributes; (iii) Houses and other related structures based on actual current market prices of materials; (iv) Standing crops equivalent current market value of the crop at the time of compensation; (v) Perennial crops and trees, cash compensation equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive value (future production) at the time of compensation. (vi) Timber trees, based on diameter at breast height at current market prices The replacement cost shall be based on applicable local government regulations if available. Replacement Cost Study - This refers to the process involved in determining replacement costs of affected (RCS) assets based on empirical data. Resettlement - This includes all measures taken to mitigate any and all adverse impacts of a project on AP property and/or livelihoods, including compensation, relocation (where relevant), and rehabilitation as needed. Resettlement Plan - This is a time-bound action plan with budget setting out compensation and resettlement strategies, objectives, entitlement, actions, responsibilities, monitoring and evaluation. Transitional Allowance This is support for severely affected and vulnerable households sufficient to provide the minimum basic needs of a household during the transition period while they are moving and reorganizing at their new sites, to be given to the following AHs: AHs who are physically displaced from housing and/or shops, or who lose 10% or more of productive assets or lose jobs permanently. A single-person household will only receive 1/5 of this amount.
Transport Allowance This is assistance to be given to AHs who have to relocate their house or store outside of the Project right-of-way (ROW). The assistance is intended to cover for
v transporting the personal belongings of the AHs. Severely affected households - This refers to affected households who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total productive land and/or assets, (ii) have to relocate; and/or (iii) lose 10% or more of their total income sources due to the Project. Squatter A squatter is a person who has no legal title to land but illegally occupies and squats upon public land. Vulnerable groups - These are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i) female headed households with dependents, (ii) disabled household heads, (iii) households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iv) children and the elderly households who are landless and with no other means of support, and (v) landless households, (vi) indigenous people or ethnic minorities.
vi ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
I. INTRODUCTION
A. GENERAL BACKGROUND
1. In 2003, the Government of Indonesia, through the Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR), requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for assistance in studying how an integrated management approach for the Citarum River, which along with neighboring river systems have been the main source of water for the Citarum River Basin and of Jakarta, could be designed and carried out. A grant for the purpose was provided by ADB, and project preparation for the Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) commenced in February 2005.
2. The water resources of the rivers and groundwater systems in the Citarum River Basin are critical to social and economic development of the country. They are essential for urban and industrial development (particularly in Jabodetabek and Bandung areas) including export industry, agricultural production through major irrigation systems, rural water supplies, electricity generation though hydropower, and fisheries. While the water resources of the Citarum River Basin are relatively abundant, competition for these resources has increased significantly over the past 20 years leading to a situation of acute water stress and depletion of aquifers in some places. Rapid urbanization has significantly increased the exposure to flood risk. Environmental degradation has reached a level that compromises public health and livelihoods, particularly for the urban and rural poor, and incurs additional economic and financial costs related to the source of bulk water supply and its treatment.
3. Citarum River Basin, with a total of 10 districts or regencies plus 6 municipalities lies in the province of West Java. As per available data from the Statistical Office of West Java (SUSENAS), the combined population of these districts and municipalities in 2004 was estimated at 27,863,544, or 72.48% of the provincial total (Table 1.1). (See Appendix 1 for maps of the Project area).
Table 1.1 Population and Households in Citarum River Basin, 2004
District Count District Count Persons Households Persons Households Bogor 3,795,066 894,128 Indramayu 1,657,614 478,208 Cianjur 2,057,314 535,058 Subang 1,383,831 421,440 Bandung 4,083,108 1,082,176 Purwakarta 757,189 193,667 Garut 2,202,467 553,696 Karawang 1,898,082 488,302 Sumedang 1,025,036 287,568 Bekasi 1,913,534 501,870 Total 13,162,991 3,352,626 Total 7,610,250 2,083,487 Municipality Count Municipality Count Persons Households Persons Households Bogor 865,231 206,112 Bekasi 1,911,513 466,096 Sukabumi 272,183 68,640 Depok 1,322,387 311,872 Bandung 2,229,392 554,880 Cimahi 489,597 124,320 Total 3,366,806 829,632 Total 3,723,497 902,288 Total Population/Households in Project Area 27,863,544* 7,168,033** Total Population/Households in West Java 38,441,212 10,033,729
7 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
*Representing 72.48% of the provincial population. **Representing 71.44% of the provincial households. Source: SUSENAS 2004
4. A management focus on integrated water resources management (IWRM) and sustainability of the water resource has been emphasized in the 2004 Water Law. The Water Law introduces the concept of management within the boundaries of a river basin and reflects the principles of decentralization and devolvement of authority to local levels as promoted by the program of regional autonomy.
5. Water has been a major area of the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) assistance to Indonesia, totalling over $1.5 billion in loans and technical assistance (TA). Improving sustainable use of water resources in-line with the ADB “Water for All” policy, together with a strong commitment to build capacity of local government agencies, are key elements of ADB’s operational partnership. In particular this partnership stresses the need to continue implementation of policy reforms, overcome weak coordination among agencies and develop guidance for cooperative working. Sustainability of economic growth and pro-poor development are key pillars of the Country Strategy and Program (CSP) that will be complemented by strengthening capacity for IWRM in the basin.
6. With support from the ADB TA, and with close consultation of basin stakeholders a “Roadmap” (Strategic investment plan) has been prepared for basin-wide integrated water resources management (IWRM) based on a “Vision” of basin stakeholders. The Vision is for “Government and community working together for clean, healthy and productive catchments and rivers, bringing sustainable benefits to all people of the Citarum River Basin”.
7. The Roadmap is essentially a planned program of interventions that will, if successfully implemented, lead to the achievement of the vision. In many cases, projects to be included in the roadmap had already been identified by previous studies. In other cases, it became apparent that interventions were required that had not been identified previously, but will be essential for achieving the objectives. A total of almost 80 Roadmap interventions were identified, with a total base cost of around $3.5 billion, proposed for a 15 year time frame (Table 1.2).
8. It is an ambitious program, and crosses a number of sectors. However, such a complex program is necessary simply because the problems are numerous and inter- related. It is probable that, if this program was to be successfully implemented, it would be one of the most comprehensive basin IWRM programs anywhere in the world.
8 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
Table 1.2 Roadmap
Key Area Component Projects (Outputs) Institutions and Support for IWRM in the 6 Ci’s River Basins Planning for IWRM (this key area is supported by parallel grant-funded technical assistance) Water Resource Rehabilitation of West Tarum Cisangkuy Irrigation Improvement Development and Canal Curug Run-of-River Power Plant Management Water Supply Options and Raising of Cirata Dam Improved Groundwater Development and Implementation Management for Bandung of Preferred Bulk Water Supply Upgrading of water sources for Options for Bekasi and Karawang Bandung Upgrading of Water Source for System Service Improvement for Irrigation (Upper Cipunegara) East and North Tarum Canal Environmental Implementation of Citarum Watershed Management and Biodiversity Protection Project. Improved on farm soil and water management practices Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans Improvement in water quality in Saguling, Cirata and Jatiluhur Reservoirs through management of fish farming and other polluting activities Development and Implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy and Action Plan for Citarum Coastline Disaster Upper Citarum Basin Flood Management Project. Management Water Sharing Development and implementation of a water entitlements and licensing system for surface water users Review of allocation priorities and optimization of operating rules for key sub-basins, including the operation of the river / reservoir system as a whole Community Support for Community- and NGO-Driven Initiatives for Improved WSS Empowerment Implementation of an Information, Education and Awareness Strategy for capacity building of communities across the basin for improved participation in water resources policy development, planning and management Data, Information Improvements to water quality monitoring in rivers and reservoirs and Decision Development of an integrated water quality and quantity model for basin Support planning studies, and a decision support tool for improved policy and decision making Improvements to groundwater monitoring network in the Bandung area
9. Strong coordination among the implementing agencies is required, along with effective monitoring and reporting mechanisms to allow GOI and funding agencies to ensure that the funds are being disbursed in accordance with the plans and in a timely way. In addition, information exchange among the implementing agencies, and other
9 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework basin stakeholders, including communities, civil society organizations (CSOs) and the private sector, will improve performance overall, and minimize wasted effort caused by overlaps.
B. ADB ROADMAP SUPPORT
10. The Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMP) will support the DGWR in implementation of the Roadmap and will be implemented in tranches, using ADB’s Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF), over a period of about 15 years. ICWRMIP will cover the entire Citarum River Basin, or a total of 10 districts or regencies plus 6 municipalities in the province of West Java. The ICWRMIP will include in tranche Project 1 system improvement of the West Tarum Canal (WTC), which traverses the Districts of Karawang, Bekasi, and the City of Bekasi and feeds about 55,000ha of irrigated land and supplies eighty percent of the surface water household and industrial needs of Jakarta. (See Appendix 1 for maps of the Project area). Project 1 also includes: (i) minor infrastructure works related community driven developments (CDD) activities including community water supply and sanitation, community environmental improvement activities and improved farmer land and water management; (ii) a Global Environmental Fund (GEF) biodiversity program in upper Citarum Basin proteched areas, and (iii) studies and preparatory activities for later ICWRMIP tranche implementation.
11. Table 1.3 below lists the planned subprojects and outputs for the entire Multi- Tranche Financing Program (MFF) (ADB loan and GEF funded components only). Appendix 2 presents the program for the ICWRMIP Indicative MFF (Including Parallel Financed Projects). These are indicative beyond Tranche 1.
12. The actual timing, content and implementation of each Project and indeed the number of subsequent Projects is flexible and shall be developed and scheduled to match funding needs of the government in a cost efficient manner.
13. A Resettlement Plan has been prepared for the West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation based on preliminary design. This RP will be updated following detailed design and will be reviewed and approved by ADB prior to implementation. This Resettlement Framework has been prepared to guide in the preparation and implementation of resettlement plans for potential subprojects with land acquisition and resettlement impacts as listed in Table 1.3.
10 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
Table 1.3: Indicative ICWRMIP Outputs Tranche Component Projects (Outputs), Resettlement Effects and Documentation 1 Rehabilitation of West Tarum Canal – covered by WTC RP Water Supply Options and Improved Groundwater Management for Bandung – Studies Improved Water and Land Management –covered by RF Support for Community- and NGO-Driven Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation – covered by WTC RP and RF Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans– covered by RF Watershed Management and Biodiversity Conservation– covered by RF Upper Citarum Basin Flood Management Project.-Studies 2 *Upgrading of water source for Bandung and other uses by inter-basin transfer – covered by RF *System Service Improvement for East Tarum Canal (ETC) – covered by RF Development and implementation of a water entitlements and licensing system for surface water users- Studies Review of allocation priorities and optimization of operating rules for key sub-basins, including the operation of the river / reservoir system as a whole- Studies Development and implementation of an IEA for capacity building of communities across the basin for improved participation in water resources policy development, planning and management-Studies 3 *System Service Improvement – North Tarum Canal (NTC) – covered by RF *Upgrading of Water Source for Irrigation (Upper Cipunegara) – RF *Curug Run-of-River Power Plant – covered by RF *Improvement in water quality in Saguling, Cirata and Jatiluhur Reservoirs through management of fish farming and other polluting activities - RF *Development and Implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy and Action Plan for Citarum Coastline - RF 4 *Raising of Cirata Dam – RF *Cisangkuy Irrigation Improvement – RF Development and Implementation of Preferred Bulk Water Supply Options for Bekasi and Karawang-Studies
*Components that will potentially trigger ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement. This will be confirmed during detailed design.
11 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
C. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT
1.3.1 Definition of Involuntary Resettlement
14. Involuntary resettlement addresses social and economic impacts that are permanent or temporary and are (i) caused by acquisition of land and other fixed assets, (ii) by change in the use of land, or (iii) restrictions imposed on land as a result of an ADB operation. An affected household (AH) or person (AP) is one who experiences such impacts.
1.3.2 Involuntary Resettlement during the Rehabilitation of WTC, ETC and NTC
15. The rehabilitation of the three canals would require physical works that will involve displacement of informal dwellers 1from homes and occupied land, including the acquisition of other assets, such as structures and trees. It is, however, believed that the rehabilitation of the canals is likely to be confined within the established and acquired right-of-way (ROW) of said waterway and its ancillary facilities. Therefore, acquisition of private land2 may not be required in the rehabilitation of the canals. This is NOT to say, however, that no private land will ever be acquired in subsequent tranches of ICWRMIP. Private properties may have to be acquired for the construction of new facilities and in the implementation of other development components of the ICWRMIP.
16. Project authorities believe that the rehabilitation of the three canals will not require widening of the present surface width of the canal. System improvement of the canals will mainly require dredging and removal of silt, and the rehabilitation of ancillary structures (i.e. flumes that double as canal crossing for people, sluice gates, etc). However, a number of fixed structures, such as houses and shops, are found along the inner slope of the canal embankments; they will have to be removed. Additionally, wooden and bamboo platforms used for toilet, bath and for laundry abound on or above the water surface of the canals. These too have to be removed.
17. With regard to the dredging and removal of silt, an estimated 1.4 million m3 of silt and earth will be removed from the WTC.3 Disposal of said dredged materials is, however, a potential resettlement issue. Project authorities will, and have actually done so in the past, stockpile re-usable dredged earth on the embankments of the canals as a temporary staging area. Said re-usable earth will be used in fortifying or fixing segments of the embankments needing repair. On the other hand, unsuitable dredged materials, such as silt, will be dumped in former river beds that came to be as a result of the re- channeling of the river following the construction of the canals. Over the years, local
1 Informal dwellers are those households who are using or occupying the affected land without formal or customary or traditional rights. Some of the informal dwellers on the banks of the canals had annual lease agreements with the Perusahaan Umum Jasa Tirta II(PJTII) for agriculture in the past, but such leases have been discontinued. 2 For this Project, private land refers to land that is covered by formal legal rights (hak milik), and customary and traditional rights (adat or ulayat). 3 As of the first half of 2006, the estimated amount of earth that has to be removed from the East Tarum Canal (ETC) is calculated at 1.4 million m³, and 1.2 million m³ from North Tarum Canal (NTC). ETC and NTC are less populated than WTC, thus, involuntary resettlement will be less in magnitude and severity in the event the two canals are rehabilitated. There is no feasibility study done yet on ETC and NTC, however.
12 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework residents have developed these ex-river beds into productive farmlands using dredged materials dumped thereat from previous maintenance activities for raising and leveling the ground The dumping of the dredged material in the ex-river beds might deprive some farmers of a cropping season, or longer depending on the length of time it might take for the soil to be restored to its previous productivity.
18. In summary, the following resettlement effects have been identified and will be addressed accordingly as per this RF during the system improvement of the WTC, ETC and NTC and other Project subprojects and components: (i) use of the shoulder of the inspection road for the temporary stock-piling of re-usable dredged materials; (ii) loss of use of areas of the ex-river beds which farmers have made productive over the years with the planned dumping of spoils thereat; (iii) acquisition of a number of structures on the embankments and which are concentrated at bridges and road crossings, including platforms on stilts above the water and which are used for toilet, bath, and laundry; (iv) disruption or loss of income from shops, canal crossing boats/ferries, and other businesses; (v) possible disruption, if not total cutting-off, of the water supply of individual households that tap water directly from the canals with the use of rubber hoses; and (vi) possible restricted access to communal resources for protected area management of the watershed for biodiversity. An RP has been prepared for the WTC. This RF applies to all other subprojects and components, including the Protected Area Management for Biodiversity component of Tranche 1, that may involve restricted access to resources, and the community-driven initiatives for improved water supply and sanitation under Tranche 1 (see Table 1.2 and further details about resource access restrictions in Section 1.3.4).
1.3.3 Associated Social Issues in the Rehabilitation of the Canals
19. Moreover, there are associated social issues that need to be addressed in the system improvement of the canals.4 These issues revolve around health and sanitation in the locality and these are rooted to poverty. While for instance owners of toilet and washing facilities in the canals will be compensated at replacement cost for these structures, these AHs and their communities also need to be provided with alternative facilities that are hygienic and that will last. The AHs cannot be allowed to rebuild their temporary toilet facilities in the waterway following completion of civil works in the canals; it is not just the health of these AHs that is at risk but also those of water users in Jakarta. Another health issue that requires a sustainable alternative with the clearing of the canals of obstructions concerns the need to provide communities adjacent to the embankments with safe household water. Water hoses connected to individual houses abound in the entire stretch of the canal. The third health-related issue concerns the risk of sexually-transmitted diseases (e.g., HIV/AIDS) spreading during rehabilitation works. Water supply and sanitation will be improved under the Project component Support for Community-and NGO-Driven Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation; sites for small land needs for this will be minimal and decided by the communities. For the WTC, this is covered under the WTC RP. For the ETC and NTC, this RF will guide in preparation of RPs as needed for this component. HIV/AIDS awareness program is addressed separately from the RF and RPs.
4 There may be other associated resettlement issues that would be identified in future subprojects. If and when they do occur, the RF applies.
13 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
20. The aforementioned are called associated social issues directly attributable to or exacerbated by the Project. For example, water supply access, and use of platforms for washing and toilet will have to discontinue because of the Project.
1.3.4 Resource Access Restrictions due to the GEF Components
21. The GEF-financed Biodiversity Conservation component will include the following subcomponents to improve livelihoods of upper catchment communities and the sustainability of water resources in the Citarum River Basin by: (i) preparing conservation action plans with stakeholders for 7 protected areas (PAs), (ii) identifying important plants and animals, and resource utilization patterns in key habitats in 7 PAs, (iii) preparing strategic conservation biodiversity conservation spatial plans, (iv) working with 148 village communities to develop their own action plans for engaging in conservation activities in this strategic conservation area, and (v) developing compatible biodiversity and land degradation information and databases made compatible with existing CRB management databases. Such activities would involve the communities and other stakeholders identifying current land and forest uses and which ones are socially and environmentally unsustainable and should be discontinued, and designing more sustainable alternative livelihood activities to restore or even improve living conditions. Such restrictions would trigger ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement. The Conservation Management Action Plans for 7 protected areas will include strategies for addressing resource access restrictions brought about by the need to reduce unsustainable land and forest use practices; such plans to include strategy for communities to participate in identifying the restrictions and designing viable alternatives to restore or improve household livelihoods. Model Conservation Village Action Plans will include detailed resource access restriction plans for addressing resource access restrictions. Such plans will be approved by ADB before implementation and will be disclosed to affected people and communities. Similarly, some other components may also cause such restrictions (as indicated in Table 1.2) and will be addressed the same way. Provisions are included in the Entitlement Matrix.
D. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE RF
22. The Directorate General of Water Resources, the Executing Agency, has adopted this Resettlement Framework (RF) to assist the EA and Implementing Agencies to address the adverse resettlement-related impacts of any of the subprojects or components of the ICWRMIP. Specifically, the RF is intended to guide in the preparation, implementation and monitoring of subproject or component resettlement plans (RPs) as identified in Table 1.2, other than the WTC RP which has already been prepared.
1.4 Contents of the RF
23. Other than this section, the other major concerns covered in the RF are as follows:
a. description of existing Government policies and procedures, and those of ADB, for addressing involuntary resettlement (Chapter 2);
14 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
b. principles and policies governing involuntary resettlement, (Chapter 3);
c. eligibility criteria and entitlements of the AHs(Chapter 4) and relocation and income restoration strategies (Chapter5):
d. the process for RP preparation and implementation (Chapters 6);
e. vulnerability, gender and ethnic issues are discussed in Chapter 7 and in Chapter 8 and 9 the RF details the involvement of stakeholders, especially of the AHs, in the preparation and implementation of the RP, including mechanism for grievance redress and disclosure;
f. the resources required to successfully prepare and implement an RP, underscoring the need for ensuring the timely availability of funds to carry out resettlement. The organizational framework, including responsibilities, required in the preparation and implementation of the RP; and
g. Chapter 10 describes the monitoring and evaluation of resettlement and in Chapter 11 the RF outlines costing principles.
15 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
II. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK
A. RELEVANT LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA
24. The key legal instruments currently in force in Indonesia that are most relevant to involuntary resettlement are Presidential Decree No. 36/2005, entitled “Provision of Land for Realizing the Development for Public Interests”, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 65/2006, entitled “On Land Acquisition for Development Purposes in the Public Interest”, and National Land Agency (BPN) Regulation No. 3/2007 on Land Acquisition Implementation Guideline for Presidential Decrees 65/2006 and 36/2005. Superseding Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 that earlier amended Presidential Decree No. 55/1993, the 2006 Presidential Decree provides for various forms of compensation for private assets needed to pursue Government development projects. Both Presidential Decree No. 65/2006 and Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 build on the provisions of the earlier Presidential Decree No. 55/1993. Essentially, the 1993 Decree lays down the rules on how Government could exercise the State’s inherent power of eminent domain. Private properties could be acquired to pave the way for development projects that serve the public interest. In 2005, the 1993 Decree was replaced allowing private corporations to acquire private properties for development projects with public character. Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 was controversial since the power of eminent domain could be used to profit private entities. Presidential Decree No. 65/2006 corrected this by restricting the use of eminent domain for Government development projects only.
25. By and large, however, both Presidential Decree No. 65/2006 and Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 are similar, merely introducing refinements in the provisions of Presidential Decree No. 55/1993. As provided for in Chapter V, Article 21 of Presidential Decree No. 36/2005, technical directives for provisions of Presidential Decree No. 55/1993 that are not contrary to Presidential Decree 36/2005 Decree remain effective.
26. Presidential Decree No. 55/1993 succeeded earlier property laws, including Law Number 5 of 1960, better known as the Basic Agrarian Law, which delineates land ownership and usage based on oftentimes overlapping traditional adat land rights, western concept of land use rights, and recent trends in land tenure. The Regulation of the State Minister of Agrarian Affairs and National Land Agency No. 1 of 1994 on Operational Directives of the Decree 55/93 is the enabling regulation in the implementation of Presidential Decree 55/1993.5 This enabling regulation has been replaced by the BPN Regulation No. 3/2007.
27. Articles 12 and 13 of Presidential Decree No. 55/1993 provides for compensation for land, buildings, plants and other objects related to the land in any of these forms: (i) cash, (ii) land for land, (iii) land in relocation site, (iv) any combination of the above forms of compensation, and (v) any other mode of compensation agreed by the concerned parties.
5 A related administrative order is Government Regulation No. 51 of 1993 (Environmental Impact Assessment) that requires a management and monitoring plan for environmental impacts, including land acquisition and resettlement. It also requires mitigation of social impacts, public disclosure, and community consultation.
16 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
28. In 2003, consistent with the national thrust to devolve central powers to the local governments, Presidential Decree 34/2003 (National Policy on Agrarian Affairs) was issued. Article 2 of said Decree mandates that land acquisition, including determining levels of compensation, for public development projects would be carried out by the district and city governments (Kabupaten/Kota). Where such authority crosses district boundaries within a single province, land acquisition would be carried out by the provincial government. Additionally, the Decree of the Head of the National Land Agency 2/2003 on Mechanisms, Norms, and Standards for Government Authority and Management of Agrarian Affairs provides further detail on how land acquisition and compensation would be carried out. The Bupati (Regent) or Walikota (Mayor) or the Governor would set up a land acquisition committee, the “Committee of Nine”, for the purpose. Members of said Committee of Nine include representatives from the Land Office, Tax Office, Buildings Office, Agriculture Office, the heads of the district and village, and two secretaries. The Committee of Nine has the authority to conduct an inventory of affected land and assets found thereat; to investigate the status of ownership over the affected land; to inform and negotiate with the property owners together with the government agency acquiring the land; to estimate the amount of compensation; and to document and witness payment of compensation.
29. There are 10 district (kabupaten) and 6 city (kota) local governments in the Citarum River Basin all have regulations which to varying degrees may have a bearing on individual resettlement plans. For example at the time of IOL only Kabupaten Bekasi had any specific decision letters/local legislation relating to resettlement along WTC: April 2007. Keputusan Bupati Bekasi Nomor 300/Kep.71-POD. I/2007 tentang Besarnya Bantauan Biaya Pindah Bangunan Di Atas Tanah Bantaran Kalimalang Untuk Kegiatan Penataan Jalan Pasir Limus Tegal Gede Wangun Harja Cikarang Utara Desa Pasir Sari Cikarang Selatan dan Jalur Jalan Desa Suka Rapih Sampai Dengan Sukarahayu Kecamatan Tambelang.(Decision of Head of District Kabupaten Bekasi regarding the payment assistance for moving structures from WTC ROW in relation to road construction in locations Pasir Limus, Tegal Gede, Wangun Harja, Cikarang Utara Desa Pasir Sari Cikarang Selatan road and Suka Rapih until Sukarahayu Kecamatan Tambelang village road) This decision letter defined a level of assistance based on property type (permanent, semi-permanent and ordinary) given for moving buildings affected construction of a road within the WTC ROW.
B. ADB POLICIES ON INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT
30. ADB has a set of stringent rules on involuntary resettlement that are aimed at helping ensure that the development initiatives it supports contribute to the reduction of poverty, not otherwise. In other words, projects assisted by the Bank should provide an opportunity for the marginal sectors of the population, especially the affected people, to improve their living standards. Following are the key principles in the Bank’s policy on involuntary resettlement. a. Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible. b. Where population displacement is unavoidable, it should be minimized by exploring all viable project options. c. All compensation is based on the principle of replacement cost.
17 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
d. Each involuntary resettlement is conceived and executed as part of a development project or program e. Affected people should be fully informed and consulted on compensation and/or resettlement options. f. Institutions of the affected people, and, where relevant, of their hosts, are to be protected and supported. Affected people are to be assisted to integrate economically and socially into host communities so that adverse impacts on the host communities are minimized and social harmony is promoted. g. The absence of a formal legal title to land is not a bar to ADB policy entitlements. h. Affected people are to be identified and recorded as early as possible in order to establish their eligibility through a population record or census that serves as an eligibility cut-off date, preferably at the project identification stage, to prevent a subsequent influx of squatters of others who wish to take advance of such benefits. i. Particular attention must be paid to the needs of the poorest affected households and other vulnerable groups that may be at high risk of impoverishment. This may include affected households without legal title to land or other assets, households headed by women, the elderly or disabled, and ethnic minority peoples. Appropriate assistance must be provided to help them improve their socio-economic status. j. The full costs of resettlement and compensation should be included in the presentation of project costs and benefits. k. Relocation and rehabilitation may be considered for inclusion in ADB loan financing for the project, if requested, to assure timely availability of the required resources and ensure compliance with involuntary resettlement procedures during implementation6.
C. ADB POLICIES RELEVENT TO RESETTLEMENT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
31. ADB’s Policy on Indigenous Peoples defines “indigenous peoples” as “those with a social or cultural identity distinct from the dominant or mainstream society”. "Indigenous peoples" is a generic concept that includes cultural minorities, ethnic minorities, indigenous cultural communities, tribal people, natives, and aboriginals. The Policy recognizes the potential vulnerability of ethnic minorities in the development process; that ethnic minorities must be afforded opportunities to participate in and benefit from development equally with other segments of society; and, have a role and be able to participate in the design of development interventions that affect them.
32. The policy on indigenous peoples is “designed to promote the participation of indigenous peoples in project preparation and implementation, to ensure that they
6 The Government has indicated it will not be requesting Loan assistance for relocation but support to livelihood and consulting may be considered for Loan assistance
18 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework benefit from development interventions that would affect them, and to provide effective safeguards against any adverse impacts”. In any ADB interventions, the approaches to be used are as follows: (i) to achieve the greatest possible reduction of poverty among the affected indigenous peoples; (ii) when negative impacts are unavoidable, they should be minimized as much as possible, and appropriate measures will be taken to mitigate the adverse impacts; (iii) in enhancing the benefits of a development intervention for indigenous peoples or reducing negative impacts of a development intervention, clear mechanisms for accurate and objective analysis of their circumstances will be prepared; and (iv) the mechanisms for any intervention must be transparent and should ensure accountability.
33. ADB’s Policy on Gender and Development adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women participate and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a gender plan is prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of women in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project.
34. Other policies of the ADB that have bearing on resettlement planning and implementation are the (i) Public Communications Policy (March 2005) and OM Section L3/BP (September 2005), and (ii) Accountability Mechanism (OM Section L1/BP, dated 29 October 2003).
D. GAPS OF INDONESIAN LAWS AND COMPARISON WITH ADB POLICIES
35. The main limitation of Presidential Decree No. 65/2006, the applicable provisions of Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 and Presidential Decree No. 55/1993, including their enabling decrees, such as the Regulation of the State Minister of Agrarian Affairs and National Land Agency No. 1 of 1994, lies on the fact that they have not been conceived and planned to address a multi-faceted social phenomenon known as involuntary resettlement. Said laws are concerned, more than anything else, with acquiring in the most expeditious way properties needed for the right-of-way (ROW) of government projects. But as explained at length in earlier sections, acquisition and/or clearing of project ROW may involve displacement of people from both material and non-material assets. These people, most of whom are already poor to begin with, are at risk of further impoverishment in the form of landlessness, joblessness, homelessness, economic marginalization, increased morbidity and mortality, food insecurity, loss of access to common property, and disintegration of community and social ties and organizations. Certainly, existing laws and policies on land acquisition cannot address these risks.
36. With regard to comparison of Indonesian Law and ADB policies, to begin with, the two are not similar. On the one hand, Indonesian laws on property acquisition for ROW are principally an exercise of the State power on eminent domain. In the acquisition process, government agencies invoking the State power on eminent domain are guided by other laws and regulations pertaining to ownership over the acquired assets and the level of compensation to be provided. Existing financial and auditing procedures must be followed, notwithstanding the fact that the affected property is not being acquired by Government on a “willing seller – willing buyer” situation. Moreover, the focus of the acquisition activity is the object to be acquired; the social situation of the person to be dispossessed of an asset is, by and large, irrelevant to the whole
19 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework transaction.
37. On the other hand, the focus of ADB Policy is the affected person or household; concerns are raised on whether or not acquiring an asset for the project ROW, regardless of the tenure status of the household, would adversely impact the AHs current living standards. Questions on whether such acquisition would put the AH at risk of impoverishment and on whether it would bring in an opportunity for the AH to improve its present status are asked. Thus, ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) seeks to restore the pre-project living standard of the AH through the replacement of lost assets in conjunction with other measures that are all aimed at rehabilitating the affected person.
38. The following legal and operational restrictions quite aptly provide a picture of how wide the gap is between existing Indonesian laws and regulations and ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement: a. Government auditing policies compel Executing Agencies not to compensate at replacement rates for affected fixed assets, such as buildings. The value of the affected asset, even if lost involuntarily, is depreciated and the value of salvageable materials deducted from the amount of compensation. b. In the absence of a law for the purpose, Executing Agencies are not compelled to pay informal settlers any compensation for affected fixed assets. In fact, it is up to the Implementing Agency to decide if these AHs would receive anything at all. c. In the absence of a law that provides for, or prohibits, the granting of income loss arising from business and work disruption, the Implementing Agency in general would rather not grant said compensation entitlement for fear of any legal backlash. d. Current legal framework does not include a definition of non-physical losses or how to apply a value to them, no requirement to identify or address vulnerable groups, no provision for any affected people other than title holders, no requirement for disclosure to affected people, and no opportunity for affected people to participate in planning, implementation or monitoring, and no requirement to develop resettlement plans. 39. It is precisely because of the limitations of and gaps in law that could comprehensively address the complex social issues attendant to ROW acquisition that the Project policies in this Resettlement Plan and Resettlement Framework have been adopted. This is discussed in Section III.
20 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
III. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
A. OBJECTIVES
40. The Government of Indonesia will use the Project Resettlement Policy (the Project Policy) for the ICWRMIP specifically because existing national laws and regulations have not been designed to address involuntary resettlement according to international practice, including ADB’s policy. The Project Policy is aimed at filling-in any gaps in what local laws and regulations cannot provide in order to help ensure that AHs are able to rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project condition. This section discusses the principles of the Project Policy and the entitlements of the AHs based on the type and degree of their losses. Where there are gaps between the Indonesian legal framework for resettlement and ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, practicable mutually agreeable approaches will be designed consistent with Government practices and ADB’s Policy.
B. PRINCIPLES
41. The core principle of the Project Policy is anchored on the philosophy that Government development projects must serve the public good and that, in the design and implementation of such projects, all efforts will be exerted to help ensure that AHs are not worse off. Moreover, the ICWRMIP should provide an opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it. Likewise, the ICWRMIP should serve as an occasion for the local population to participate in its planning and implementation, thereby engendering a sense of ownership over the Project, subprojects and other components. Towards this end, the PIUs will endeavor to carry out the ICWRMIP and any of its subprojects and components based on the following principles: a. Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be avoided or minimized as much as possible by identifying possible alternative project designs and appropriate social, economic, operation and engineering solutions that have the least impact on populations in the project area. b. All AHs residing, working, doing business and/or cultivating land within the project impacted areas as of the date of the latest census and inventory of lost assets(IOL), are entitled to compensation for their lost assets (land and/or non-land assets), at replacement cost and restoration of incomes and businesses, and will be provided with rehabilitation measures sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. c. All affected people will be eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of tenure status, social or economic standing and any such factors that may discriminate against achievement of the objectives outlined above. Lack of legal rights to the assets lost or adversely affected tenure status and social or economic status will not bar the AH from entitlements to such compensation and rehabilitation measures or resettlement objectives.
21 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
d. AHs will be fully consulted and given the opportunity to participate in matters that will have adverse impacts on their lives during the design, implementation and operation of the Project. Plans for the acquisition of assets will be carried out in consultation with the AHs who will receive prior information of the compensation, relocation and other assistance available to them. e. Any acquisition of, or restriction on access to, resources owned or managed by the AHs as a common property, e.g., communal forest, communal farm, will be mitigated by arrangements that will ensure access of those AHs to equivalent resources on a continuing basis. f. Payment for land and/or non-land assets will be based on the principle of replacement cost (local regulations, where available and applicable, shall be fully followed in the implementation process). g. Shop owners and operators will be encouraged and facilitated to start construction of a replacement of their stalls before fully demolishing the existing ones in order to minimize, if not avoid, income loss arising from the disruption of business operation. h. AHs that lose only part of their physical assets will not be left with a portion that will be inadequate to sustain their current standard of living. The minimum size of remaining land and structures will be agreed during the resettlement planning process. i. Temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will be restored to pre-project conditions. j. There shall be effective mechanisms for hearing and resolving grievances during implementation of the land acquisition and resettlement plans. k. Existing cultural and religious practices shall be respected and, to the maximum extent possible, preserved. l. Special measures will be incorporated in the RPs and in complementary mitigation and enhancement activities to protect socially and economically vulnerable groups at high risk of impoverishment, such as ethnic minorities, women-headed families, disabled-headed households, landless households, children and elderly people without support structures, and people living in poverty. Appropriate assistance will be provided to help them improve their socio-economic status. m. Adequate resources will be identified and committed during land acquisition and resettlement planning. This includes adequate budgetary support fully committed and made available to cover the costs of land acquisition, compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation within the agreed implementation period for the Project; and, adequate human resources for supervision, liaison and monitoring of land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation activities. n. Appropriate reporting, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be identified and set in place as part of the resettlement management system. Monitoring and evaluation of the land acquisition, resettlement and
22 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
rehabilitation processes and the final outcomes will be conducted by an independent monitoring agency and/or NGO. o. The RPs summary in the form of a Project Information Booklet (PIB) will be translated into Bahasa and placed in the village offices for the reference of AHs as well as other interested groups. A copy of the RP in the local language will be placed in Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and district offices. p. Whilst Construction Contracts may be awarded EA will not issue notice to proceed for any civil works in any given Construction Works Zone (CWZ) unless the Government has satisfactorily completed, for that given CWZ, payment of compensation for affected assets and facilitate any relocation to new sites, in accordance with the approved RP for that geographic location, or CWZ. Livelihood restoration measures must also be in place but not necessarily completed, as these may be ongoing activities. q. The PIU will carry out its best efforts to minimize the resettlement transition period. Acquisition of assets, payment of compensation, and the resettlement and start of the livelihood rehabilitation activities of AHs, will be completed prior to any construction activities taking place in a designated constructions works zone7 (CWZ). , except when a court of law orders so in expropriation cases. (See item r below) r. In the event that the AH and the Implementing Agency fail to agree on the replacement cost for a given property, the procedures on grievance redress spelled out in Section X will be followed. Should a negotiated settlement fail, the Implementing Agency will initiate expropriation proceedings as provided for by Presidential Decree No. 65/2006 and based on the rules of court of Indonesia. Under no circumstance will the AH be evicted from his/her property nor will the Government take over his/her property without the explicit permission of the court. Moreover, the Government will deposit in an escrow account to be designated by the court the proffered replacement cost of the subject property. Within 120 days following the adjudication of the expropriation case, the Implementing Agency will pay the AH the amount decided by the court.
C. CUT-OFF DATE OF ELIGIBILITY
42. The cut-off-date of eligibility refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area (i.e., area within the COI) makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorized as AH and be eligible to Project entitlements. The establishment of the eligibility cut-off date is intended to prevent the influx of ineligible non-residents who might take advantage of Project entitlements
7 A CWZ shall be a designated zone defined during detailed design and clearly identified in the RP update that will divide the WTC into convenient stretches for construction implementation. AHs will be resettled from CWZ in a systematic way so as to optimize implementation of project whilst paying due consideration to AHs rights under the RP implementation. Notice to Proceed with civil works for a complete CWZ will only be issued after completion of the aforementioned RP activities.
23 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
D. PRINCIPLE OF REPLACEMENT COST
43. Affected land within government land (e.g. WTC right-of-way
a. Existing local government regulations for compensation calculations for building, crops and trees will be used where ever available.
b. Houses and other related structures based on actual current market prices of affected materials;
c. Annual crops equivalent to current market value of crops at the time of compensation;
d. For perennial crops, cash compensation at replacement cost is equivalent to current market value given the type and age at the time of compensation.
e. For timber trees, cash compensation at replacement cost will be equivalent to current market value for each type and age at the time of compensation based on the diameter at breast height of each tree.
44. In any case that private land will be affected outside government land as per final detailed design, replacement land for affected households households who have formal legal rights (hak milik) and customary and traditional rights (adat or ulayat) and those whose claim over the affected land is under application for full title, replacement cost is the amount calculated before displacement which is needed to replace an affected asset as follows:
a. Productive Land (agricultural, aquaculture, garden and forest) based on actual current market prices that reflect recent land sales in the area, and in the absence of such recent sales, based on recent sales in comparable locations with comparable attributes, fees and taxes or in the absence of such sales, based on productive value;
b. Residential land based on actual current market prices that reflect recent land sales, and in the absence of such recent land sales, based on prices of recent sales in comparable locations with comparable attributes; fees and taxes.
45. Non-land assets on affected private land will also be at replacement cost as defined above.
24 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
IV. PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
46. The project entitlements developed and presented in the entitlement matrix below correspond to the potential impacts identified during the census and inventory of losses. It should be noted that these entitlements may be revised or enhanced, as necessary, following the conduct of detailed measurement survey (DMS) and consultation with APs to ensure that losses are restored, if not improved. Any revisions/enhancement in the entitlements will be reflected in the updated RP for ADB review and approval.
Where there is a gap on the local government legal background for compensation to informal settlers or users of land, the Project will consider mutually acceptable mechanisms to cover the difference for example under a “special program” under a Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP). Table 4.1 Entitlement Matrix IT CATEGORY OF Entitled Persons PROJECT Notes/ E IMPACTS/LOSSES ENTITLEMENTS Implementation M Arrangement
A. Impacts on LAND 1 Permanent loss of who have formal legal • Cash or in kind Local regulations, paddy/residential/c rights (hak milik) and compensation at where available and ommercial land customary and traditional replacement cost applicable, shall be rights (adat or ulayat) and which is based on fully followed in the those whose claim over market value that implementation the affected land is under reflect recent land process. application for full title sales and in the absence of such recent sales, based on productive value (for productive/ agricultural) or based on similar location attributes (for residential and commercial land 2 Temporary loss of who have formal legal • Payment of rent for Contractor will be paddy/residential/c rights (hak milik) and residential land responsible for ommercial land customary and traditional based on existing or returning land to rights (adat or ulayat) and ongoing rental pre-project/better those whose claim over agreement in the condition the affected land is under area or as per Local regulations, application for full title negotiation with where available and AHs. For productive applicable, shall be land, rental will be fully followed in the no less than the net implementation income that would process. have been derived from the affected property during disruption. • Compensation for affected crops at
25 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
IT CATEGORY OF Entitled Persons PROJECT Notes/ E IMPACTS/LOSSES ENTITLEMENTS Implementation M Arrangement
replacement cost for the duration of the impact, and • Land will be restored to pre-project condition or better 3 MARGINAL Users/Occupants who • No compensation for Local regulations, IMPACTS due have NO formal legal land, where available and Permanent Loss of rights (hak milik) nor • Compensation for applicable, shall be Land Use customary and traditional crops and trees fully followed in the rights (adat or ulayat) based on implementation : Marginal impacts: replacement cost process. principle Not their main source of income 4 Temporary Loss of Users/Occupants who • No compensation for Local regulations, Land Use have NO formal legal land, where available and rights (hak milik) nor • Compensation for applicable, shall be Due to spoil customary and traditional affected crops at fully followed in the dumping on ex-river rights (adat or ulayat): replacement cost for implementation bed or due to the duration of the process. construction impact, and APs to re-use after activities. • The project will dredged material facilitate formal has been dumped leasing if requested and assessed for by user/occupant. any contamination The potential and certified safe identified land will be for use. Should the assessed for any land be deemed contamination and unusable AHs will certified as safe for be entitled to use. livelihood restoration under a LRP
Contractor will be responsible for returning ex-river bed land to pre- project/better condition.
B Relocation of AHs 1 Relocation of AHs who have formal legal • Compensation for Local regulations, and Shop Owners rights (hak milik) and crops and trees where available and due to Permanent customary and traditional based on applicable, shall be Loss of Land Use rights (adat or ulayat) and replacement cost fully followed in the those whose claim over principle implementation the affected land is under • Provision of process. application for full title transport allowance based on actual cost of moving to new The LRP allowance site (labor, transport shall be based on cost) or provision of poverty threshold transport assistance for an average 5 will be provided in household the form of program members. A single within the LRP. person household
26 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
IT CATEGORY OF Entitled Persons PROJECT Notes/ E IMPACTS/LOSSES ENTITLEMENTS Implementation M Arrangement
• Provision of will receive 1/5 of transition said amount. subsistence allowance will be provided in the form of program within the LRP. • Entitled to participate in Livelihood restoration program 2 Relocation of AHs Informal Dwellers but • No compensation for Local regulations, and Shop Owners Have Other Land on land, where available and due to Permanent Which Outside the Project • Compensation for applicable, shall be Loss of Land Use Area structures based on fully followed in the replacement cost implementation principle process. • Compensation for crops and trees based on The LRP allowance replacement cost shall be based on principle poverty threshold • Provision of for an average 5 transport allowance household based on actual cost members. A single of moving to new person household site (labor, transport will receive 1/5 of cost) or provision of said amount. transport assistance will be provided in the form of program within the LRP. • Provision of transition subsistence allowance will be provided in the form of program within the LRP. • Entitled to participate in Livelihood restoration program. • 3 Relocation of AHs Informal Dwellers but • No compensation for Local regulations, and Shop Owners Have NO Other Land land where available and due to Permanent Outside the Project Area • Compensation for applicable, shall be Loss of Land Use structures based on fully followed in the replacement cost implementation principle process. Compensation for crops and trees Individual or small based on group relocation replacement cost sites as per AHs’ principle final option. AHs • For house and have the option to house-cum-shop, have a access to a the Project will place to rent
27 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
IT CATEGORY OF Entitled Persons PROJECT Notes/ E IMPACTS/LOSSES ENTITLEMENTS Implementation M Arrangement
facilitate to find outside the access to a residential plot that residential plot (and will be facilitated by with commercial the PIU. advantage for house-cum-shops) The Project will within the village or assist AHs in the nearby, with determination of affordable renewable lease amount. lease or lease-to-buy For vulnerable AHs agreement. The who may not have area will be with the ability to similar or better generate much conditions as before income, the LRP with latrine will be designed to • For shops, the increase income Project will facilitate levels sufficiently to to find access to a be able to pay the place/plot to full local market lease/rent with leases. similar commercial advantage either in The LRP allowance existing market sites shall be based on or a plot of land poverty threshold suitable for putting for an average 5 up stalls/shops (new household market). Lease members. A single arrangement will be person household with a provision to will receive 1/5 of renew and shall be said amount. facilitated by the project. Provision of transport allowance based on actual cost of moving to new site (labor, transport cost)or provision of transport assistance will be provided in the form of the LRP. • Provision of transition subsistence will be provided in the form of the LRP. • Entitled to participate in Livelihood restoration program. C NON-LAND ASSETS 1a Houses/Shops and Owners regardless of • Compensation at Local regulations, Secondary whether or not the owner replacement cost where available and Structures has hak guna bangun based on actual applicable, shall be (building permit) current market fully followed in the prices of materials implementation and actual cost of process.
28 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
IT CATEGORY OF Entitled Persons PROJECT Notes/ E IMPACTS/LOSSES ENTITLEMENTS Implementation M Arrangement
labor for dismantling, transfer and rebuild • 1b Renters of Structures • Assistance to Local regulations, (house/shops) tenants/renters to where available and find a new place to applicable, shall be live or do business fully followed in the • Assistance to find implementation new rental property process. • Entitled to participate in Livelihood restoration program. 2 Public Owner (Government) • Rebuild the facilities Infrastructure and based on agreement Facilities by both parties.. 3 Crops and Trees Owners • Annual Crops. If Local regulations, standing crops are where available and destroyed or cannot applicable, shall be be harvested, fully followed in the compensation based implementation on replacement cost process. principle • Perennial Crops. Compensation based on replacement cost • Timber Trees. Compensation at current market rates based on type of tree and diameter of trunk at breast height D INCOME LOSS 1 Significant Impact House-cum-shop and • Entitled to participate The LRP allowance Due to Relocation shop-owners whether or in the Livelihood shall be based on of Shops or not with land outside the Restoration Program poverty threshold House-cum-shops Project Area (LRP) for an average 5 household members. A single person household will receive 1/5 of said amount.
E HIGH RISK OF IMPOVERISHMENT /HARDSHIP 1 Due to loss of Poor and vulnerable • Entitled to participate “LRP allowance” resource base Households even if in the Livelihood will be provided to marginally affected Restoration Program participants using a and LRP Allowance. poverty threshold for an average 5 household members. A single person household will receive 1/5 of said amount. AHs are taking part
29 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
IT CATEGORY OF Entitled Persons PROJECT Notes/ E IMPACTS/LOSSES ENTITLEMENTS Implementation M Arrangement
in the program and in the process of restoring their income.
F LOSS OF ACCESS 1 Restricted Use of • Provision of As per consultation Waterway for Toilet Communal Sanitary with AHs, residents and Laundry Toilet and Safe and local Purposes and water facilities in government source of HH water selected points The budget for the along the canal/river planning and as included in the construction of the project design aforementioned will activities. come from the Community Rural Water Supply and Sanitation component of ICWRMIP. 2 Restricted Access to resources • Community decision making on what resource use shall be restricted and identification of alternative livelihoods to replace the lost resources. • Community design of alternative livelihoods to replace the restricted use of resources. G IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION 1 Non-Land Assets Owners of affected non- • Compensation at land assets Replacement Cost as indicated above
47. Implementation arrangements will be based on the entitlement matrix and existing local government regulations, basic considerations for implementation are summarized below:
a. In the case that there are no local regulations available regarding compensation, APs will be entitled to replacement cost as described in the entitlement matrix b. In the case that there are local regulations available regarding compensation APs will be entitled to compensation as stipulated in the existing local government regulation available at the time of implementation. c. Any gaps in the local regulation on providing replacement cost compensation will be fulfill in the form of a special program a LRP.
30 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
d. Allowances defined in the entitlement matrix may be provided as cash or in kind or alternatively may be provided in the form the LRP (community empowerment program). e. Monitoring and evaluation of the resettlement activities should refer to the implementation approach defined in the above points (a), (b), (c) and (d). V. RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION STRATEGY
A. RELOCATION STRATEGY
48. Households will be consulted with regard to their option for relocation. For households who are entitled to payment for land, it will either be land-for-land in a resettlement site or individual site or cash/in-kind compensation or in the form of a special program under the LRP at replacement cost. For those who have no rights to their land, the implementing agencies will facilitate in finding replacement land for these AHs in a resettlement site, group or individual sites. The arrangements will be on a renewable lease agreement, lease-to buy arrangements. The area will be with similar or better conditions as before. They will also be provided transport and transitional assistance in the form of a special program under the LRP while relocating and re- establishing their houses. For independent shops/stalls, the Project will facilitate access to a place/plot to lease/rent with similar commercial advantage either in existing market sites or a plot of land suitable for putting up stalls/shops (new market) with lease arrangement with a provision to renew. They will also be provided transport and transitional assistance in the form of a special program under the LRP while relocating and re-establishing their businesses. Thus, they will be in a position to be able to re- establish and restore their income sources and their income losses will be minimized.
49. The amount of the lease will be determined in consultation with AHs, and will take into account the ability of each AH to pay. For vulnerable AHs who may not have the ability to generate much income, consideration will be given to either adjusting the lease amount accordingly until they are able, in the form of a special program under the LRP, to increase their income level sufficiently to be able to pay the full amount of the lease.
B. LIVELIHOOD/INCOME RESTORATION STRATEGY
50. Where the policy requirements and implementation arrangements deem necessary and appropriate the RP will contain a Livelihood Restoration Program tailor made to suit the AHs compensation and livelihood restoration needs and the specific regulations and policies of the local government in which the RP activities are to be implemented. In general a LRP will be divided into two sections: (i) special program (if there is a gap) and (ii) general program.
51. A joint PIU-local government working group (Resettlement Working Group- RWG) will coordinate the identification of those eligible under the LRP, assistance to the RWG may be provided from a Project Implementation Consultant (PIC).
52.Where required a special program under the LRP will include an allocation of an amount to cover any specific gaps inlocal government regulation on providing for
31 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework compensation related to losses from (i) affected structures, crops and trees, required during relocation. The level of actual impacts, costs and level of assistance will be determined during RP preparation and will be assessed in close cooperation with project implementing Unit (PIU) of the implementation agency and local government..
53. The LRP general program will provide suitable livelihood related activities under the LRP for AHs including the severely affected and vulnerable AHs, and may include: (a) general allowances (e.g. transport and transitional) related to relocation and livelihood restoration, and (b) livelihood activities aimed at income generating and poverty reduction.. The program will be based and designed according to the results of needs assessment to be carried out by the local organization with the AHs during the updating of the RP. In deciding on an appropriate livelihood activities, the following factors will be taken into account: (i) the nature of loss and/or situation of the AH; (ii) preference of the AH, (iii) level of preparedness of the AH to participate in the livelihood activity, and (iv) economic viability of the livelihood activity. The PIU will engage the services of a local NGO or any organization who have expertise in social development and training. Participating AHs will also receive transition subsistence allowance in form of a program for a maximum of 6 months sufficient to provide the minimum basis needs of a household of 5 members. This is also based on the assumption that it will take a maximum of 6 months in order for these AHs to start earning income from the program. It should be noted that the local organization or NGO will review and adjust if necessary depending on the final design of the livelihood activities as per consultation with AHs. To ensure the benefits of the project reach local inhabitants and no social jealousies develop, selective activities under the LRP related to livelihood improvements will be available for poor inhabitants of villages living in the vicinity of the canal. The RWG will coordinate the identification of those eligible with assistance from the PIC.
VI. RP PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
A. INITIAL SCREENING
6.1.1 Screening and Condition for Appraisal of ICWRMIP Subprojects
54. During preparation of each Periodic Financing Request each Project, subproject or project component shall undergo an initial screening to determine the nature of any impact and the need for specific resettlement plans.
55. Any subproject that is to be considered for inclusion in ICWRMIP will be screened and prioritized based on technical and socio-economic criteria agreed between the Government of Indonesia and ADB. Moreover, consistent with the overriding concern of the RF that every effort must be exhausted to ensure that any and all adverse social impacts of subprojects are avoided or mitigated, a candidate subproject will have to be evaluated using the screening matrix in Table 6.1 below. The screening matrix aims to provide the Executing Agency and the ADB preliminary information on involuntary resettlement that will aid them to decide on whether or not a candidate subproject is worth pursuing. Specifically, the screening matrix will provide a preliminary estimate of the scale and magnitude of involuntary resettlement, coupled with an assessment of the
32 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework capacity and preparedness of the Government to address said adverse social impacts, if there are any.8 Additionally, based on the number and severity of adverse social impacts, the Executing Agency would know whether or not a full or a short RP has to be prepared for the candidate subproject.
56. The Government of Indonesia is aware of the policy of ADB that requires the review and approval by the ADB of the RP for a particular subproject as a precondition for appraisal of the same.
Table 6.1 Screening Questions for Resettlement Categorization9
Probable Involuntary Resettlement Effects Yes No Not Possible Known Will the subproject include any physical construction work? Does the subproject include upgrading or rehabilitation of existing physical facilities? Will carrying out the subproject lead to loss of housing, other assets, resource use or incomes and livelihoods? Is land acquisition, titled and non-titled properties, required? Is the ownership status and current usage of the land known? Will easements be utilized within the existing Right-of-Way (ROW)? Are there any non-titled people who live or earn their livelihood within the subproject ROW? Will there be loss of housing? Will there be loss of agricultural plots? Will there be losses of crops, trees, and fixed assets? Will there be loss of businesses or enterprises? Will there be loss of incomes and livelihoods? Will people lose access to facilities, services, or natural resources? Will any social or economic activities be affected by land use-related changes? If involuntary resettlement impacts are expected: • Is government prepared and willing to provide adequate resources, either from its own counterpart funds or from loan proceeds, to address said adverse social impacts as provided for in the RF? • Is there sufficient skilled staff in the Executing Agency for resettlement planning and implementation? Information on Affected Persons and Households:
Any estimate of the likely number of households that will be affected by the Project? [ ] No [ ] Yes If yes, approximately how many? ______
Are any of them poor, female-heads of households, or vulnerable to poverty risks? [ ] No [ ] Yes If yes, briefly describe their situation: ______
Are there affected persons (APs) or households (AHs) from indigenous or ethnic minority groups? If yes, briefly describe their situation:
8 A subproject that has high economic returns with minimal or no social costs will naturally be preferred. 9 This is an adaptation of the Involuntary Resettlement Categorization form used by the ADB.
33 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
Project Categorization and Resettlement Planning Requirements [ ] Category A, Significant IR impact, a full Resettlement Plan is required. [ ] Category B, Non-significant IR impact, a short Resettlement Plan is required. [ ] Category C, No IR impact, no resettlement report is required.
6.1.2 Decision on a Full or a Short RP
57. The screening criteria based on the degree of resettlement impacts are: a. Significant - as a result of the subproject, 200 or more people (approximately 47 households) will experience major impacts, that is, being physically displaced from housing, or losing 10 per cent or more of their productive (income-generating) assets. 10 A full resettlement plan will be required; b. Not significant - as a result of the subproject, fewer than 200 people will be physically displaced from housing or lose less than 10 per cent of their productive (income-generating) assets. A short resettlement plan or CDD Template Assessment equivalent (see below) will be required; or c. No resettlement effect - the subproject does not require temporary or permanent land acquisition, and there are no impacts involving the loss of land, structures, crops and trees, businesses or income. No resettlement plan is required.
58. The same essential elements must be addressed in a full and short RP, however, the level of detail will differ depending on the level of impact. (Refer to Appendix 4 for the format and scope of an RP).
59. There is no known ethnic minority group living in the Citarum River Basin which differs from the dominant Sundanese population in terms of culture, economic systems, and social institutions. ADB’s Policy on Indigenous Peoples is not triggered by this Project
B. COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT (CDD)
60. ICWRMIP supports a number of small scale home-based and community based activities which may require the use of small plots of land (e.g. individual or community septic tanks, household waste composting facility). Such activities are identified by communities with Project facilitation through NGOs, the selection criteria for such activities requires communities to participate in the development and also receive the assets and be responsible for future operations and maintenance. Subproject selection criteria also requires the community to provide any land needed for temporary disturbances during construction and that permanently required by the works. The land involved is small but the Project as part of the detailed design will require a short assessment and confirmation of the land required for the works and confirmation no voluntary contributions of land amount to more than 10% of any one individual’s productive assets without compensation. A short template assessing any impacts and confirming conformity with the above selection criteria will be completed jointly with the involved communities with facilitation by the Project NGO, for all CDD, This assessment and community confirmation will be sufficient documentation to support implementation.
10 Paragraph 19, ADB Operational Manual Section F2/OP, issued on 25 September 2006.
34 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
Should CDD works not meet the above criteria a short RP may be considered as an alternative to rejecting the activities.
C. RP PREPARATION
61. If resettlement impacts are unavoidable and preparation of a resettlement plan is therefore required, a RP will be prepared following detailed design using the following procedures:
(i) Undertake a census of all APs. (ii) Undertake detailed measurement survey (DMS)11 of all losses of all APs. At the same time, inform potential APs (without discrimination) of the subproject, its likely impacts, and principles and entitlements as per the RF. (iii) Undertake a socioeconomic survey (SES) 12 of at least 10% of all APs, 20% of severely affected AHs and ethnic minorities’ population. (iv) Undertake a replacement cost survey for various types of affected assets as a basis for determining compensation rates at replacement cost. Determine the losses in accordance with the entitlement matrix.13 (v) Provide project and resettlement information to all persons affected in a form and language that are understandable to them, and closely consult them on compensation and resettlement options, including relocation sites and economic rehabilitation. (vi) Prepare the draft RP with time-bound implementation schedule, procedures for grievance mechanism and monitoring and evaluation, and a budget. (vii) Finalize the subproject RP and translate the summary (PIB) in local language. (viii) Disclose the draft and final RP in accordance with ADB’s policy on public communications14 to the affected communities and on ADB’s website. The draft RP will be disclosed to APs prior to submission to ADB for approval. The final RP will be disclosed after approval.
Table 6.2 : Surveys for RP Preparation Detailed The census and detailed measurement survey (DMS) of lost assets will collect data Measurement on the affected assets from 100% of APs following detailed engineering design. The data Survey (DMS) collected during the DMS will constitute the formal basis for determining AP entitlements and levels of compensation. For each AP, the scope of the data will include: • Total and affected areas of land, by type of land assets; • Total and affected areas of structures, by type of structure (main or secondary); • Legal status of affected land and structure assets, and duration of tenure and ownership; • Quantity and types of affected crops and trees; • Quantity of other losses, e.g., business or other income, jobs or other productive assets; estimated daily net income from informal shops; • Quantity/area of affected common property, community or public assets, by type; • Summary data on AHs, by ethnicity, gender of head of household, household size,
11 Data will be gender and indigenous peoples disaggregated. 12 It will include gender analysis and data will be gender and ethnic minority disaggregated. 13 If there are new categories of APs and/or losses identified during the DMS (other than those described in the entitlement matrix), the entitlements will be derived in a mutually acceptable way in accordance with Government’s and ADB’s policy and guidelines. 14 ADB, 2005, Public Communications Policy. Manila.
35 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
primary and secondary source of household income viz-a-viz poverty line, income level, whether household is headed by women, elderly, disabled, poor or indigenous peoples; • Identify whether affected land or source of income is primary source of income; and • AP knowledge of the subproject and preferences for compensation and, as required, relocation sites and rehabilitation measures. Socioeconomic At a minimum, the socioeconomic survey (SES) will collect information from a sample of Survey 10% of affected people and 20% of severely affected AHs, disaggregated by gender and ethnicity. The purpose of the socioeconomic survey is to provide baseline data on AHs to assess resettlement impacts, and to be sure proposed entitlements are appropriate, and to be used for resettlement monitoring. The scope of data to be collected includes: A. Household head: name, sex, age, livelihood or occupation, income, education and ethnicity; B. Household members: number, livelihood or occupation, school age children and school attendance, and literacy, disaggregated by gender; C. Living conditions: access to water, sanitation and energy for cooking and lighting; ownership of durable goods; and D. Access to basic services and facilities. Replacement The replacement cost survey (RCS) will be done in parallel with DMS and SES Cost Survey activities by collecting information from both secondary sources and primary sources (direct interviews with people in the affected area, material suppliers, house contractors, local governments), and from both those affected and those not affected. Compensation rates will be continuously updated to ensure that APs receive compensation at replacement cost at the time of compensation payment.
D. RP IMPLEMENTATION
62. During the process of completion of detailed design, RP updating will commence. Subsequent resettlement activities will be coordinated with the schedule of civil works. Land acquisition and relocation of affected households cannot commence until the 15 updated RP, for the subproject or designated constructions works zone (CWZ)., has been reviewed and Approved by ADB.
The EA will carry out its best efforts to minimize the resettlement transition period and undertake the acquisition of assets, payment of compensation, and the resettlement and rehabilitation of AHs, except for long-term rehabilitation measures, in a timely manner to be completed prior to any construction activities take place in a designated constructions 16 works zone (CWZ).
VII. VULNERABILITY, GENDER, AND ETHNICITY
15 A CWZ shall be a designated zone defined during detailed design and clearly identified in the RP update that will divide the river/canal into convenient stretches for construction implementation. AHs will be resettled from CWZ in a systematic way so as to optimize implementation of project whilst paying due consideration to AHs rights under the RP implementation. Notice to Proceed with civil works for a complete CWZ will only be issued after completion of the aforementioned RP activities. 16 A CWZ shall be a designated zone defined during detailed design and clearly identified in the RP update that will divide the river/canal into convenient stretches for construction implementation. AHs will be resettled from CWZ in a systematic way so as to optimize implementation of project whilst paying due consideration to AHs rights under the RP implementation. Notice to Proceed with civil works for a complete CWZ will only be issued after completion of the aforementioned RP activities.
36 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
ISSUES
63. Vulnerable AHs are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately of face the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement. These are female-headed households with dependents, disabled household heads and households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, children and elderly who are landless and with no other means of support, landless households, ethnic minorities. Particular attention will be given to poor and vulnerable AHs during RP preparation and implementation. Separate consultation meetings will be conducted with these households on specific resettlement concerns, such as compensation and entitlements, rehabilitation of livelihoods and relocation as relevant. All public information and consultation meetings will ensure that vulnerable households are present.
64. With regard to gender strategy, it includes specific activities to ensure project benefits for women as shown below.
a) Consultation meetings on resettlement activities will be held separately with women, female headed households and elderly women; b) The resettlement working group will include women representatives from affected households; c) At the inception of the Project, a capacity building training program on resettlement activities will be designed for the women and men local officials, and women and men from affected households to orient them about resettlement activities. Participation of poor women, female headed households in the training will be ensured; d) The training will include information on resettlement activities, management of cash assistance received, grievance procedures and impact of the project on livelihood activities e) The capacity building training on resettlement issues will be conducted separately for women including the female-headed households; f) During the conduct of the DMS, men and women from the households will participate in the said activity; g) Livelihood activities will be planned with active involvement of women; need assessment for livelihood activities and skill development of livelihood activities will be conducted separately for women members, poor women, female-headed households, and elderly women; h) Assistance for affected non-land assets and other allowances will be given to both men and women from the households; Specific attention will be provided for the poor women headed households, elderly women in paying the compensation on time and developing suitable livelihood activities for elderly and poor female headed households; i) Separate discussion with women members, female headed households, elderly women, ethnic minority household for selection of relocation sites, housing structure, and other social infrastructures, including timing of relocation; j) Special measures will be taken in the relocation of elderly, disabled and female headed households in terms of location of new site together with their extended families/relatives. k) Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender will be developed for monitoring of Social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood program, and resettlement
37 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
activities.
VIII. CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE
65. Consultations will be conducted with the AHs, particularly with the vulnerable and severely affected. All consultation and disclosure activities will be properly documented. All minutes of meetings, photos, attendance sheets will be prepared and recorded.
66. Following the socialization activities with the AHs and concerned groups, the issues and suggestions raised to ensure compliance to the Project policies will be incorporated in the draft RP. The said draft RP will be disclosed to APs prior to submission to ADB for review and approval. The EA will disclose (i) draft RP prior to submission for review and approval by ADB; (ii) final RP approved by both the EA and ADB, and (iii) any revisions to the RP as a result of design layout. Key information in the RP to be disclosed to the affected households will include (i) compensation, relocation and rehabilitation options, (ii) DMS results, (iii) detailed asset valuations, (iv) entitlements and special provisions, (v) grievance procedures, (vi) timing of payments, and (vii) displacement schedule. The information will be made publicly available in Project and commune offices and provided to the affected households in the form of a summary RP, an information leaflet or brochure. Social monitoring reports will also be made available to affected households and will be uploaded on ADB website. IX. GRIEVANCE REDRESS
67. Grievances related to any aspect of resettlement will be handled through negotiation aimed at achieving consensus within 120 calendar days referring to existing indonesian regulations17. Complaints will pass through 3 stages before they could be elevated to a court of law as a last resort, thus:
1. First Stage
68. An aggrieved AH may bring his/her complaint before any member of the RWG or the area coordinator of SES, either in writing or verbally. It is incumbent upon said member of the RWG to notify the Village Chief about the complaint who, in turn, will inform the Camat. The Sub-district Chief together with the Village Chief will have 40 calendar days following the lodging of the complaint by the aggrieved AH to act on the case. He/she may call, as needed, any member of the LAC, to help him/her come up with an acceptable resolution of the complaint. The Kecamatan (Sub-district government) is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that it handles.
17 “Peraturan President Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan President Nomor 36 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Nomor 36 Tahun 2005” and “Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 TAHUN 2007, Tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentigan Umum Sebagaimana Telah Diubah Dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubaan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum”
38 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
2. Second Stage
69. If after 40 calendar days the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Camat or the Desa/Lurah about the complaint, or if the AH is not satisfied with the decision taken by the Camat, the AH may bring the complaint, either in writing or verbally, to the Bupati (Head of Regency or District) or the Walikota (City Mayor). The Bupati or Walikota in turn will have 40 calendar days following the lodging of the complaint by the aggrieved AH to act on the case. He/she may call, as needed, any member of the LAC, to help him/her come up with an acceptable resolution of the complaint. The Kabupaten/Kota (Regency/City Government) is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that it handles.
3. Third Stage
70. If after 40 calendar days the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Kabupaten/Kota, or if the AH is not satisfied with the decision taken by the Bupati or Walikota, the AH may bring the complaint, either in writing or verbally, to the Office of the Provincial Governor. The Governor has 40 calendar days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. The Office of the Governor is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that reaches the same.
4. Final Stage, the Court of Law Arbitrates
71. If after 40 days following the lodging of the complaint, the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Office of the Provincial Governor of if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken by the Provincial Governor, the complain may be brought to a court of law for adjudication. The rules of court will be followed in the adjudication of the complaint
39 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
X. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
A. EXECUTING AND IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES
1. Introduction
72. The Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR) within the Ministry of Public Works (MPW) will be the ICWRMIP Executing Agency. DGWR has established a Project Coordination and Management Unit (PCMU) within the Citarum River Basin Organisation Unit (Balai Besar Wilaya Sungai Citarum) to be responsible for overall management and coordination of all project activities. Program Management Consultants to advise the PCMU on safeguards, provide oversight of safeguard application, and provide long-term capacity building will consist of one national social and one national environmental safeguard specialist and an international resettlement specialist to provide periodic safeguard oversight, guidance and training. Project Implementation Units (PIUs) will be established in each Implementing Agency, and each PIU will establish and staff a Social and Environmental Section.
73. ICWRMIP Tranche 1 will be implemented over six years starting in FY 2009 (see Appendix 3). The PCMU and PIUs have been established; PIUs have commenced advance procurement and preparatory activities. Tranche 1 implementation will commence with (i) full operational effectiveness of PIUs and PCMU; (ii) engagement of Program Management Consultants and Project Implementation Consultants; (iii) detailed engineering design of the WTC; (iv) institutional assessments and diagnostics; (v) civil society organization (CSO) stakeholder analysis and media campaigns, (vi) identification of target villages for community-driven components of the ICWRMIP, (vii) capacity building, and (viii) data gathering, establishment of information systems and setting up PPMS systems and procedures.
74. Consulting support for most of the ICWRMIP component projects will be required. The requirement for consulting services cannot be exactly defined at this stage, due to the inherent flexibility of the MFF modality. However, consultant requirements for the first tranche have been identified, including nation resettlement specialists.
75. The Executing Agency will approve the RP for a particular subproject or component before this is endorsed to ADB for review and concurrence. Likewise, overall responsibility in ensuring that the approved RP is implemented satisfactorily rests on the Executing Agency. In the ICWRMP, the Government bodies that will play a key role in the preparation and implementation of resettlement plans are the Implementing Agencies and the Land Acquisition Committee (LAC).
76. The Government instrumentality that has always taken the lead in land acquisition is the Panitia Sembilan (Committee of Nine) at the local government level. The creation of the Committee of Nine was first mandated by Presidential Decree 55/1995. Subsequent Presidential Decrees (i.e., 36/2005 and 65/2006) replaced the Committee of Nine with the LAC. The members of the LAC are still representative from the same
40 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework offices that constituted the Panitia Sembilan plus other stakeholders which the local government head (i.e., provincial governor, district regent, or municipal/city mayor) would appoint. The operation of the LAC is guided by existing national and local laws and regulations, some of which are not in accord with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement.
77. For each subproject or component of the ICWRMIP that entails involuntary resettlement, the PIU will work closely with the Land Acquisition Committee to ensure mutually agreeable RPs are designed and implemented consistent with the RF.For WTC RP included in the tranche Project 1 in Q1 2009 an interagency Resettlement Working Groups (RWG) was formed from representatives from local government (3 LGs Bekasi District, Karawang District and Bekasi Kota, the WTC Operations management organization PJT-2 , and DGWR). The roll of the RWG is discussed below.
78. At the moment, however, the Executing Agency does not have any unit or section that handles social issues, including involuntary resettlement. For this reason, a section in the PCMU and in each Project Implementation Unit (PIU) that will be set-up for the overall operation and management of the ICWRMIP subprojects will be organized to handle involuntary resettlement. These sections may also handle environmental concerns and, as such, will bear the name Social and Environmental Section.
79. The following subsections present the key bodies involved in the preparation and implementation of subproject RPs. During Tranche Project 1 of the ICWRMIP, technical assistance in the form of institutional strengthening will be extended by the ADB to prepare these bodies to carry out their functions and responsibilities. Likewise, any new Implementing Agencies that enter the Project during subsequent tranches will also require strengthening to be able to address resettlement and other social issues. There is provision under the Project for consultant input and capacity strengthening as required under future tranches.
2. Institutions for Resettlement
a. The Social and Environmental Section
80. The Social and Environment Section at each PIU of the Implementing Agency will be organized and will take the lead in ensuring that an RP for a given subproject or component of ICWRMIP is prepared and implemented in accordance with the RF and the loan agreement. It is for this reason that the SES in each PIU will have at least one (1) senior staff who specializes in social development. Additionally during Tranche 1 of the ICWRMIP, each Tranche 1 PIU Social and Environment Section will be provided training sufficient for its staff to be able to satisfactorily discharge their duties. The task of setting-up and strengthening the Social and Environment Sections will be included in the terms of reference (TOR) of the Project Implementation Consultant of Tranche 1 of the ICWRMIP. Below are the responsibilities of the Social and Environment Section:
a. Discuss the RF with concerned offices at the DGWR; relevant offices of the Provincial Government and concerned District Governments, such as the
41 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
Development Planning Agency (BAPPEDA); and the members of the LAC/RWG.
b. Assist the district LAC/RWG to conduct census, IOL, and SES as discussed in line with the requirements of the RF.
c. Assist the district LAC/RWG to initiate the conduct of replacement cost study (RCS) in the district where the subproject is located.
d. Process the gathered data (i.e the results of the IOL and the SES of AHs) and set-up and maintain a data retrieval system.
e. Assist the district LAC/RWG to conduct the needed consultations and meetings with stakeholders, especially the AHs, during the preparation of the RP of a subproject or component of the ICWRMIP, specifically discussing with the AHs the results of the impacts assessment, entitlements under the RF, for compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation options.
f. Translate into Bahasa Indonesia the draft RP, the final approved RP, the summary RP, and the public information booklet (see Item g below).
g. With the assistance of the district LAC/RWG, disclose the draft subproject RP to AHs in a form and manner they can understand and in a place accessible to them. This can be in the form of a summary RP or public information booklet (PIB). The following information will be included in the PIB: (i) a brief background of the ICWRMIP and the subproject, specifically the civil works to be undertaken and the anticipated adverse social impacts; (ii) IOL results, with a statement that detailed information is available at the village office; (iii) basis used for asset valuations, stating also that detailed information is available at the village office; (iv) the entitlements due to the AHs, included in a summary entitlement matrix; (v) timing of payments and displacement schedule; (vi) grievance redress mechanism; and (vii) contact persons at the Implementing Agency. A copy of the RP for the WTC is attached.
h. With assistance from the LAC/RWG, distribute the PIB to the concerned local government offices and to all AHs the draft RP to the village chiefs for posting in the village office prior to appraisal of a given subproject, the final subproject RP, and any subsequent revised version of the RP that might result from the detailed technical design or change in scope of the subproject..
i. Draft the subproject RPs according to the results of the consultations with the APs and consistent with the RF, and submit the same to the Executing Agency for endorsement to the ADB.
j. Ensure the timely allocation of resources and budgetary provisions from the National Government for use in the preparation (which includes the operation of the Land Acquisition Committee) and implementation of the subproject RPs.
42 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
k. Assist the LAC/RWG during the conduct of the impacts assessment, negotiation with AHs on compensation and other entitlements, and the implementation of resettlement, ensuring that these are done according to the RF. The Social and Environment Section will report to the Project Director at the Implementing Agency and to the PIU the progress in RP preparation and implementation, including problems encountered for appropriate action.
l. Engage the assistance of experts to help, as necessary, in the planning and implementation of income restoration measures to help AHs rehabilitate themselves and address associated social issues, such as health and sanitation.
b. Provincial Government
81. The Provincial Government of West Java, through the BAPPEDA, will have the following functions relative to the preparation and implementation of subproject RPs, as requested by the District government or EA:
a. Help ensure that the concerned Districts are able to organize and mobilize the Land Acquisition Committee;
b. Facilitate the release of funds from the National Government needed in the preparation and implementation of the subproject RPs; and
c. Assist in the expeditious and judicious resolution of complaints of AHs (See Grievance Redress).
c. District/Municipal Government (Kabupaten/Kota)
82. The Kabupaten/Kota, through the Office of the Bupati (Regent) or Walikota (Mayor) will provide the main workforce in the preparation and implementation of the RP. The Kabupaten/Kota will have the following functions:
a. Organize the working group for resettlement by way of a Decree;
b. Issue a Decree on the unit costs of affected assets based on replacement cost and/or market rates;
c. Manage and disburse the funds for paying the compensation of AHs for lost assets; and
d. Assist in the expeditious and judicious resolution of complaints of AHs.
d. Land Acquisition Committee/Resettlement Working Group
43 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
83. The LAC/RWG is the main workforce behind the preparation and implementation of subproject RPs.
84. The functions of the LAC/RWG include the following:
a. Assist in the necessary surveys and field investigation needed in the updating of the RP;
b. Carry out consultation-meetings with the AHs, including the distribution of the PIB/disclosure of the draft and final updated RP;
c. Review and approve the results of the replacement cost survey;
d. Plan restoration of land to its pre-project condition to ensure that AHs will be allowed to use affected land after it has been assessed for any contamination and certified as safe for use;
e. Prepare relocation plan during RP updating. Activities include, facilitate in finding replacement plots for residential for all relocating AHs within or nearby villages with affordable and renewable lease or lease-to-buy agreement, with similar or better conditions as before, with latrine. For affected shops, facilitate to find suitable place/plot to lease/rent (existing/new markets) within/nearby villages, with a provision to renew. Ensure that no AHs will be displaced until suitable sites have been found and that updated RP has been approved by ADB;
f. Provide special attention to poor and vulnerable AHs through consultation and ensure that their concerns and special needs are addressed during RP updating and implementation;
g. Together with the PIC and NGO, design and implement the restoration and livelihood restoration program, and monitor said activities and provide modifications in the program to improve implementation as and when necessary;
h. Prepare the necessary vouchers and other documentation to facilitate the expeditious processing of the compensation of the AHs and deliver compensation payment to the AHs;
i. Receive complaints, verbal or written, from the AHs and ensure that these are brought to the attention of the Bupati or Walikota for appropriate action;
j. Maintain a record of all public meetings, complaints, and actions taken to address complaints and grievances at the District/City level; and
k. Submit quarterly progress reports on RP updating and implementation (payment, relocation, income restoration) to the PIU.
.
44 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
e. Mobilization Of Project Implementation Consultants
85. The PIC will in general be an integral part of the Detailed Engineering Design and Construction Supervision consultancy and will be composed of a team resettlement consultants to assist the PIU in the updating and implementation of the RP (including detailed measurement surveys and replacement costs surveys). The PIC resettlement consultants will also assess the capacity of the implementing agencies and provide the necessary capacity building interventions (such as orientation, workshops, on-the-job training). Composition of PIC consultants will be assessed during the initial screening of a subproject and may consist as follows:
• Resettlement consultant(s), • Gender/social development consultant, • Training program experts for LRP • NGO subcontract • Independent appraiser subcontract • Detailed Measurement and Replacement Costs Surveyors
f. Mobilization Of NGO/Local Organization
86. To help ensure better management of the design and implementation of the relocation plan and Livelihood Program, the PIC will sub-contract this endeavor with a local NGO or professional group that has track record in resettlement and community- based socio-economic work.
87. The NGO may assist in group will (i) review and finalize special program with regard to supplementary assistance that cannot be covered under the existing laws and regulations of the Government (for example, payment of non-land assets and transition allowances) to meet the project objectives;(ii) design and implement alternative livelihood activities under the Livelihood Restoration Program; and (iii) assist in the design and implementation of relocation plan for affected households as this will be dependent on the design of livelihood activities.
88. This group will have (i) resettlement experts, (ii) social development experts whose field of specialization covers poverty, gender, and ethnic minority concerns; (iii) livelihood experts specializing in community-based micro-livelihood program and micro- financing; (iv) training program experts specializing in the planning and implementation of community-based vocational and skills training programs.
g. Mobilization Of Professional Appraiser For Replacement Cost
89. If there is no existing local government regulations for use in compensation calculations for, the PIC will engage resources to to carry out replacement cost survey (RCS) to verify and establish compensation rates for crops, trees, structures, and other non-land based income e.g. fishponds) to ensure that the APs are compensated at
45 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework replacement cost at the time of compensation payment. The PIC will review local government regulations and where adequate and appropriate align the updated RP RCS with these regulations. The RCS will be carried out in parallel with the DMS.
XI. MONITORING
A. INTERNAL MONITORING
90. The PIU will serve as the Project’s internal monitoring body. Quarterly reports will be submitted to the DGWR starting from the commencement of RP updating, which coincides with the conduct of the detailed measurement survey and other RP updating activities. The DGWR in turn will include updates on resettlement in its regular progress reports to ADB. Social monitoring reports will be made available to the affected households and will be submitted to ADB for web posting.
91. Internal monitoring and supervision will have the following objectives:
a. Compensation and other entitlements are computed at rates and procedures as provided in the approved RP, with no discrimination according to gender, vulnerability, or any other factor;
b. Affected households are paid their compensation and other entitlements as per approved Updated RP, ensuring that all entitlements are delivered as planned and agreed, including compensation in cash or in kind, allowances, replacement land, resettlement sites developed and people moved onto them;
c. Livelihood restoration programs designed and delivered including modifications in the programs and provision of additional cash and in-kind assistance to the participating affected households as and when necessary;
d. Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed as described in the approved RP;
e. Capacity of APs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special attention given to severely affected and vulnerable households. Focus will also be given if the objective of improving socio-economic condition of vulnerable households is achieved.
f. Affected public facilities and infrastructure are restored promptly; and
g. The transition between resettlement and commencement of civil works is smooth and that sites are not handed over for civil works until affected households have been satisfactorily compensated and resettled.
46 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
B. EXTERNAL MONITORING
92. The main objective of external monitoring is to provide an independent periodic review and assessment of (i) achievement of resettlement objectives; (ii) changes in living standards and livelihoods; (iii) restoration and/or improvement of the economic and social base of the affected people; (iv) effectiveness and sustainability of entitlements; and (v) the need for further mitigation measures. 93. Strategic lessons for future policy formulation and planning will also be drawn from the monitoring and evaluation of resettlement. This is possible through a Post- Resettlement Implementation Evaluation Study that will be carried out carry out 6-12 months following completion of all resettlement activities. 94. The external monitoring agency (EMA) will be recruited by the PIU or PCMU prior to RP updating activities. Relative to compliance monitoring during resettlement implementation, the main activities of the EMA will revolve around the following: a. Review existing baseline data and gather additional socio-economic information, as necessary, on sample affected households; b. Monitor updating and implementation of the RP; c. Identify any discrepancy between policy requirements and actual implementation of resettlement; d. Monitor the resolution of complaints and grievances of affected households; and e. Provide recommendations for improving resettlement updating and implementation. f. Review compliance with regard to use of ADB loan funds for land acquisition and resettlement. g. Issue certification that each AP has received the full payment. h. Carry out resettlement audit
95. Specific to resettlement updating and implementation activities, the EMA will monitor and evaluate specific issues such as the following:
• Public consultation and awareness of resettlement policy and entitlements; • Coordination of resettlement activities with construction schedule; • Construction/Rebuilding of replacement houses and structures to new relocation sites (outside the ROW); • Level of satisfaction of AHs with the provisions and implementation of the RP; • Grievance redress mechanism (documentation, process, resolution); • Effectiveness, impact and sustainability of entitlements and income restoration programs and the need for further improvement and mitigation measures • Relocation site development (housing and market) from identification of sites in consultation with AHs, to resettlement site development and relocation of AHs. • Capacity of affected households to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special attention will be given to severely affected households and vulnerable households focusing on achieving project objectives of improving socio-economic stats of vulnerable households;
47 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
• Resettlement impacts caused during construction activities. • Participation of AHs in RP updating and implementation
XII. RP BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION
96. The budget will cover compensation costs, allowances, relocation and rehabilitation measures, administration costs, and contingency. RP cost or part of it will either be part of the Government’s counterpart fund or ADB Loan. For counterpart fund, the Government will ensure timely provision of counterpart funds for resettlement to meet any unforeseen obligations in excess of the resettlement budget estimates in order to satisfy resettlement requirements and objectives.
97. The Resettlement Plan prepared for each subproject will identify key activities for which funds will be used, any disbursal milestones and auditing requirements that will facilitate appropriate and timely delivery.
98. The RP will be prepared following detailed design. All resettlement activities will be coordinated with the civil works schedule. Land acquisition and relocation of affected households cannot commence until the RP has been reviewed and approved by ADB. The IA and RWG will not allow construction activities in specific sites until all resettlement activities have been satisfactorily completed, agreed rehabilitation assistance is in place, and that the site is free of all encumbrances.
48 ADB Project No. 37049-02-INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) Resettlement Framework
Appendix 1 Maps of the Project Area
Political Subdivision of Project Districts
49 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Location Map of the Tarum Canals
50 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
51 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Appendix 2: list of consultation meetings for the WTC rehabilitation RP
Number of participant No District Sub District Village Date/Time Venue AHs LG PJT Issues/Raised by AHs and Other G
Consultation Meeting for Preparation Inventory Lost of Impact of WTC Rehabilitation 1 Bekasi Consultation Meeting with Bekasi 2 Oktober 2006 Bekasi Bappeda Hall - 10 2 - Explanation the ADB policy in District, 09.00- 12.00 involuntary resettlement for WTC Preparation Inventory Lost of Impact of - Discussion implementation sche West Tarum Canal (WTC) inventory lost of impact of WTC Rehabilitation rehabilitation in Bekasi area - To absorb information and opini from district team member in conducting inventory lost of imp WTC rehabilitation in Bekasi are 2 Karawang Consultation Meeting with Karawang 3 Oktober 2006 Karawang Bappeda - 24 1 - Explanation the ADB policy in District, 09.00- 12.00 Hall involuntary resettlement for WTC Preparation Inventory Lost of Impact of - Discussion implementation sche West Tarum Canal (WTC) inventory lost of impact of WTC Rehabilitation rehabilitation in Bekasi area - To absorb information and opini from kabupaten team member in conducting inventory lost of imp WTC rehabilitation in Bekasi are
Socialization and Public Meeting RP of WTC Rehabilitation
1 Karawang 6 November 2006 Cibeet Syphon, 71 11 2 - Socialization for WTC Rehabilita 09.00-12.00 Mulyajaya Village, - To absorb AHs opinion and Teluk Jambe Barat information abaout WTC rehabil Sub District 2 Karawang 6 November 2006 Mulyasari Village 55 12 4 - Socialization for WTC Rehabilita 13.00-16.00 Hall, Ciampel Sub - To absorb AHs opinion and District information about WTC rehabilit 3 Bekasi 8 November 2006 Cikarang Weir Office, 40 7 3 - Socialization for WTC Rehabilita 09.00-12.00 Cikarang Utara Sub - To absorb AHs opinion and District information abaout WTC rehabil
Socialization and Gender Public Meeting RP of WTC Rehabilitation
1 Karawang 16 November 2006 Cibeet Syphon, 23 1 3 - Socialization for WTC Rehabilita 09.00-12.00 Mulyajaya Village, - To absorb special opinion from w Teluk Jambe Barat AHs of WTC rehabilitation
52 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Number of participant No District Sub District Village Date/Time Venue AHs LG PJT Issues/Raised by AHs and Other G
Sub District 2 Karawang 16 November 2006 Mulyasari Village 63 13 4 - Socialization for WTC Rehabilita 13.00-16.00 Hall, Ciampel Sub - To absorb special opinion from w District AHs of WTC rehabilitation
Focus Group Discussion for Public Facilitation
1 Bekasi Cikarang Pusat Pasir Tanjung Monday, House of Chief RT 9 3 2 - Planning of clean water facility 23 April 2007, - Planning of public sanitary 10.00-16.00 - Planning of septic tank 2 Bekasi Cikarang Selatan Jaya Mukti Monday, House of Mr.Ade 3 3 2 No plan for clean water facility, sinc 16 April 2007, people have dug wells. 09.00-12.00 3 Bekasi Cikarang Selatan Cibatu Monday, House of Chief RT 3 2 2 - Planning of clean water facility 16 April 2007, - Planning of public sanitary 01.00-04.00 - Planning of septic tank 4 Bekasi Cikarang Selatan Pasirsari Wednesday, House of Chief RT 3 2 1 - Planning of clean water facility 18 April 2007, - Planning of public sanitary 13.00-16.00 - Planning of septic tank 5 Bekasi Cikarang Utara Wangunharja Wednesday, House of Chief RT 4 2 2 - Planning of septic tank 11 April 2007, 10.00-15.00 6 Bekasi Cikarang Utara Sukadanau Saturday, Musholla As Sa’ad Rt 43 1 2 To discuss the resolution problems 7 April 2007, 03/02 Sukadanau embankment of WTC (BTB 35-35A 09.00-12.00 which domiciled by the Sukadanau people (Madura ethnic) 7 Bekasi Cikarang Utara Sukadanau Thursday, House of Chief RT - 1 3 - Purpose to build bridge to cross 18 April 2007, in BTB 36a-36b, replacing the c 10.00-15.00 craft 8 Karawang Ciampel Mulyasejati Monday, Deliberation Hall 5 1 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 09 April 2007, (WTP) 10.00-12.00 - Planning of public sanitary 9 Karawang Ciampel Mulyasari Monday, Mulyasari Village Hall 12 1 4 - Planning of water treatment proc 09 April 2007, (WTP) 13.00-16.00 - Planning of public sanitary - Purpose to build bridge to cross in BTB 3b (kampong Situ), repla the old bridge - Purpose to build bridge to cross in BTB 3, widening the old bridg 10 Karawang Ciampel Kutapohaci Tuesday Deliberation Hall 8 4 4 - Planning of water treatment proc
53 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Number of participant No District Sub District Village Date/Time Venue AHs LG PJT Issues/Raised by AHs and Other G
10 April 2007 (WTP) 13.00-16.00 - Planning of public sanitary 11 Karawang Ciampel Kutanegara Tuesday Deliberation Hall 38 3 3 - Planning of water treatment proc 10 April 2007 (WTP) 10.00-13.00 - Planning of public sanitary - Purpose to build bridge to cross Wednesday in BTB 5 (kampong Karehes), w 11 April 2007 the old bridge 13.00-16.00 - Purpose to build bridge to cross in BTB 6a-6b (kampong Ciparay widening the old bridge 12 Karawang Ciampel Kutamekar Wednesday Deliberation Hall, 49 2 4 - Planning of water treatment proc 11 April 2007 Kutamekar Village (WTP) 10.00-13.00 Hall - Planning of public sanitary
Saturday 14 April 2007 09.00-17.00
Monday 16 April 2007 09.00-13.00 13 Karawang Ciampel Parungmulya Tuesday Parungmulya Village 32 10 2 - Planning of water treatment proc 17 April 2007 Hall (WTP) 13.00-15.00 - Planning of public sanitary
Saturday 21 April 2007 09.00-13.00 14 Karawang Teluk Jambe Timur Pinayungan Tuesday Public Figure’s house 6 1 2 - Planning of water treatment proc 17 April 2007 (WTP) 13.00-17.00 - Planning of public sanitary 15 Karawang Teluk Jambe Timur Sirnabaya Tuesday Public Figure’s house 3 1 2 - Planning of water treatment proc 17 April 2007 (WTP) 09.00-12.00 - Planning of public sanitary 15.00-17.30 16. Karawang Teluk Jambe Timur Puseurjaya Wednesday Public Figure’s house 2 2 1 - Planning of water tower and tan 18 April 2007 the height of 4-5m 09.00-15.00 - Planning of public sanitary 17. Karawang Teluk Jambe Timur Sukaluyu Wednesday Public Figure’s house 4 2 1 - Planning of WTP 18 April 2007 - Planning of dug well and water p
54 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Number of participant No District Sub District Village Date/Time Venue AHs LG PJT Issues/Raised by AHs and Other G
12.00-13.00 - Planning of water tower and tan the height of 2-3m Thursday - Planning of public sanitary 19 April 2007 13.00-16.00 18 Karawang Teluk Jambe Timur Wadas Thursday Public Figure’s house 1 2 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 19 April 2007 (WTP) 09.00-13.00 - Planning of public sanitary 19 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Margakaya Wednesday Margakaya Village 35 6 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 4 April 2007 Hall (WTP) 09.00-14.00 - Planning of public sanitary - Purpose to build bridge to cross in BTB 19c (kampong Cisalak), replacing the emergency bridge (bamboo) 20 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Margamulya Thursday Public Figure’s house 26 3 2 - Planning of water treatment proc 5 April 2007 (WTP) - Planning of public sanitary 21 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Karangligar Wednesday Karangligar Head 11 2 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 4 April 2007 Village’s House (WTP) 13.30-16.00 - Planning of public sanitary 22 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Karangmulya Wednesday Public Figure’s house 14 1 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 4 April 2007 (WTP) 16.30-18.00 - Planning of public sanitary
Thursday 5 April 2007 16.00-18.00 23 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Wanasari Tuesday Public Figure’s house 19 3 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 3 April 2007 (WTP) 13.30-17.00 - Planning of public sanitary - Purpose to build new bridge to c WTC in BTB 22, to connecting Pasircabe and Karangmulya Ha 24 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Mulyajaya Tuesday Saung Cibeet 7 2 1 - Planning of water treatment proc 3 April 2007 (WTP) 09.00-12.00 - Planning of septic tank
RP Working Group Coordination
1 Bekasi District, Karawang District, Kota Bekasi (RP Friday Bekasi Bappeda Hall - Socialization of resurvey WTC
55 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Number of participant No District Sub District Village Date/Time Venue AHs LG PJT Issues/Raised by AHs and Other G
Working Group) 5 Juni 2008 - Facilitation to establish the distr 09.00-11.30 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 2 Karawang Teluk Jambe Timur Monday Pinayungan Village - 18 - - Socialization of resurvey WTC 26 Mei 2008 Hall - Facilitation to establish the Sub 09.30-12.00 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 3 Karawang Ciampel Monday Ciampel Sub District - 20 2 - Socialization of resurvey WTC 26 Mei 2008 Hall - Facilitation to establish the Sub 13.00-15.00 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 4 Karawang Teluk Jambe Barat Tuesday Teluk Jambe Barat - 18 - - Socialization of resurvey WTC 27 Mei 2008 Sub District Hall - Facilitation to establish the Sub 08.00-10.00 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 5 Bekasi Cikarang Pusat, Tuesday Bale Rakyat Hall, - 32 - - Socialization of resurvey WTC Cikarg Selatan, 27 Mei 2008 Cikarang Utara - Facilitation to establish the Sub Cikarang Utara 10.00-13.00 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 6 Bekasi Tambun Selatan Wednesday Tambun Selatan Sub - 38 - - Socialization of resurvey WTC 28 Mei 2008 District Hall - Facilitation to establish the Sub 09.00-12.00 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 7 Kota Bekasi Wednesday Kota Bekasi Bappeda 6 13 2 - Socialization of resurvey WTC 28 Mei 2008 Hall - Facilitation to establish the Distr 09.00-12.00 team work for resurvey WTC - To get feedback from meeting participant 8 Bekasi Cikarang Utara Sukadanau Saturday Musholla As Sa’ad Rt - Socialization of resurvey WTC to 7 Juni 2008 03/02 Sukadanau from Sukadanau village people (Madura ethnic)
Consultation Meeting with Karawang District, Bekasi District, and Kota Bekasi
1 Karawang District, Bekasi District, and Kota Bekasi (RP Thursday Bekasi Bappeda Hall - 42 1 - Presentation and discussion res
56 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Number of participant No District Sub District Village Date/Time Venue AHs LG PJT Issues/Raised by AHs and Other G
Working Group) 5 Juni 2008 resurvey WTC 09.00-12.00 - To discuss rate compensation fo - To get feedback from meeting participant 2 Karawang District, Bekasi District, and Kota Bekasi (RP Thursday Bekasi Bappeda Hall - 32 1 - Completing result of resurvey W Working Group) 12 Juni 2008 - Following to discuss rate 09.00-14.00 compensation for AHs - To get feedback from meeting participant
Note: LG : local Government; AHs : Affected Households; PJT : West Tarum Canal (WTC) operator
57 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
58 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Appendix 3 Indicative ICWRMIP Program
ICWRMP Indicative ICWRMIP Program
Year PROJECT 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Tranche 1 Loan Financed Program Management Rehabilitation of West Tarum Canal Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans Water Supply Options Management for Bandung Land and Water Managment Support for Community- and NGO- Driven Initiatives for Improved Water and Catchment Management Parallel Financed Institutional Strengthening for IWRM (ADB TA) Productive Reforestation of Degraded Catchments [Phase 1] (GEF) Project Preparation for Tranche 2 (ADB TA) Tranche 2 Loan Financed Program Management Ongoing support for WRC and supporting office(s), and capacity building for WRM agencies at provincial and district level
59 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Review of allocation priorities and optimization of operating rules for key sub-basins, including the operation of the river / reservoir system as a whole Upgrading of water source for Bandung and other uses by inter- basin transfer
60 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Year PROJECT 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 System Service Improvement – East Tarum Canal Development and implementation of a water entitlements and licensing system for surface water users Development and implementation of an IEA for capacity building of communities across the basin for improved participation in water resources policy development, planning and management Parallel Financed (Indicative) Policy development for appropriate water pricing, water allocation and balanced stakeholder participation Development of strategies and options for demand management and water conservation with respect to industrial and domestic use Productive Reforestation of Degraded catchments [Phase 2] (GEF) Protected Area Management (Biodiversity) [Phase 2] (GEF) Project Preparation for Tranche 3 (ADB TA) Tranche 3 Loan Financed Program Management Mini- and Micro- Hydropower Basin Study
61 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Review and updating of River Basin Plan ("Pola") System Service Improvement – North Tarum Canal Upgrading of Water Source for Irrigation (Upper Cipunegara) Curug Run-of-River Power Plant Improvement in water quality in Saguling, Cirata and Jatiluhur Reservoirs through mgt of fish farming and other polluting activities
62 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Year PROJECT 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Development and Implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy and Action Plan for Citarum Coastline Parallel Financed Project Preparation for Tranche 4 Tranche 4 Loan Financed Program Management Raising of Cirata Dam Cisankuy Irrigation Improvement Development and Implementation of Preferred Bulk Water Supply Options for Bekasi &Karawang Parallel Financed Investigation of water supply and sanitation options for urban areas (apart from Bandung, Bekasi and Karawang) Development of an on-line flow forecasting system on unregulated rivers 589,500 24,600 Procurement of consultants 61,410 Project implementation 675,510
63 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
64 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
65 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Appendix 4 Format and Scope of a full RP and a short RP
Topic Contents
Executive
Summary Scope of land • Scope of and rationale for land acquisition acquisition and • Alternative options, if any, considered to minimize land acquisition resettlement and its effects, and justification for remaining effects • Key effects in terms of land acquired, assets lost, and number of people affected. • Primary responsibilities for land acquisition and resettlement. Socioeconomic • Population record of people affected information • Data on existing economic and social conditions of affected people, including socio-economic survey. Gender disaggregated socio- economic data is necessary. • Asset inventory, land assessment and assessment of other losses resulting from land acquisition, taking into account social, cultural, and economic impact on people affected. • Details on common property resources, if any. • Project impact on the poor, indigenous people, ethnic minorities, and other vulnerable groups, including women, • Special measures needed to enhance economic and social base of vulnerable groups. Objectives, policy • Purpose and objectives of land acquisition and resettlement. framework, and • Borrower’s policy and legal framework for resettlement, with any gaps entitlements in this framework as compared to ADB policy • Measures proposed to bridge the gap between ADB and borrower’s policies • Principles, legal and policy commitments from executing agency for different categories of project impacts. • Eligibility policy and entitlement matrix for all categories of loss, including compensation rates at replacement costs. • Principles for determining valuation and compensation for assets, incomes and livelihoods Gender Impact and • Identification of socio-economic condition, needs, and priorities of Mitigati Measures women • Measures to ensure that process of land acquisition and resettlement does not disadvantage women • New land/house titles will be in the name of both spouses. For land/house given as replacement property, titles will be in the name of the person who brought in the original property.
66 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Topic Contents
Information • Identification of project stakeholders. Dissemination, • Disclosure of project information Consultation, • Consultations for determining principles Participatory • Mechanisms for stakeholder participation in planning, management, Approaches and monitoring, and evaluation Disclosure • Disclosure of RP to people affected Requirements • Local institutions or organizations to support people affected. Potential role of non-government organizations (NGOs), women’s groups and community-based organizations (CBOs). Grievance Redress • Mechanisms for resolution of conflicts and appeals procedures Mechanisms Relocation of • Options for relocation of housing and other structures, including housing and replacement housing, replacement cash compensation, and/or self settlements selection. • Measures to assist with transfer and establishment at new sites. • Options for developing relocation sites, if required, in terms of location, quality of site, and development needs. • Plan for layout, design, and social infrastructure and services for each site. • Measures for planned integration with host communities • Special measures for addressing gender issues and those related to vulnerable groups. • Environmental risks identification and arrangements for environmental management and monitoring. Income restoration • Identification of livelihoods at risk. strategy • Income restoration strategy with options to restore all types of livelihoods. • Job creation plan, including provisions for income substitution, retraining, self-employment and pensions, where required. • Business relocation and restoration plan, including income substitution, where required. • Environmental risks identification and arrangements for environmental management and monitoring.
67 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Topic Contents
Institutional • Main tasks and responsibilities in planning, negotiating, consulting, framework approving, coordinating, implementing, financing, monitoring and evaluating land acquisition and resettlement. • Review of mandate of the land acquisition and resettlement agencies and their capacity to plan and manage these tasks. • Provision for capacity building, including technical assistance, if required. • Role of NGOs, if involved, and organizations of affected persons in resettlement planning and management. • Involvement of women’s groups in resettlement planning, management and operations, job creation and income generation • Female staff will be hired by the resettlement agency to work with and assist women in all aspects of resettlement activities, including planning and implementation of income restoration programs. Resettlement • Cost estimates, budgets and cash flows for meeting the objectives of budget and the RP according to established schedules financing • Land acquisition and resettlement costs. • Annual budget and timing for release of funds. • Sources of funding for all land acquisition and resettlement activities. Implementation • Time schedule showing start and finish dates for major resettlement schedule tasks. • Time bound actions for projected activities to ensure that people affected are compensated and assisted before award of civil works contracts or similar milestone, ensuring as a minimum that affected people will be provided with entitlements, such as land and asset compensation and transfer allowances, prior to their displacement Monitoring and • Plan for internal monitoring of resettlement targets, specifying key evaluation indicators of progress, mechanisms for reporting, resource requirements and database maintenance. • Plan for external and independent M&E • Participation of affected people in M&E • Impacts on women
68 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
69 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Appendix 5 Socio-economic Survey Instrument Used in WTC
Census No. __/ __/ __/ ______/ Station: …………………... km Kelurahan: …….…………………… Location of Affected Assets/s: Kecamatan: ………………………… Left Embankment Left side Right side Kabupaten: …………………………. Right Embankment Left side Right side
Appendix 4
CENSUS OF AHs
1. Information on Head of Affected Household (AH) 1.1 Name of respondent: ………………………………………. 1.2 Is the respondent the household head? [1] Yes (If yes, go to 1.4) [2] No If no, what is the relationship to the household head? ………………………… 1.3 Name of household head: ………………………………………………………… 1.4 Gender of household head …………… [1] Male [2] Female 1.5 Age of household head: …………….. 1.6 Primary Occupation of household head: ……………… 1- Farming/livestock 5- Retired 2- Business/Trader/Vendor/Shop Owner 6- Unemployed looking for work 3- Driver/Laborer 7- Other: (specify) ………… 4- Employee (private / government) 1.7 Educational attainment of household head: 1- No education 5- Completed High School 2- Not completed Elementary 6- Not completed College 3- Completed Elementary 6- Finished College 4- Not Completed High School 1.8 Religious Affiliation: 1- Islam 2- Christian 3- Hindu 4- Buddhist 5- Other: (specify) …
2. Ownership status household over the affected assets 2.1 Ownership status over the affected assets (fill in as appropriate)
Status of Ownership Owner Renter Occupy with Encroacher/ Occupied Yes or No Yes or No permission Informal since Yes or No dweller Yes or No Land House/Building Temporary Stall (warung) Other structures (fence, toilet, etc.) Crops and Tress
2.2 If the AP is not the owner of the house/building ask information about the owner
70 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
2.2.a Name of the owner: ……………………. 2.2.b Address of the owner: No. … Kecamatan: ………. Kabupaten: …………. Province/City: ………………. 2.2.c Occupation of the owner: ………………… 2.2.d If renting the affected structure/stall, how much do you pay per month? Rp ………
2.3 If AH is not the owner of the affected land, ask information about the owner 2.3.a Name of the owner: ……………………. 2.3.b Address of the owner: No. ………. Kecamatan: ………….. Kabupaten: …………. Province/City: ………………. 2.3.c Occupation of the owner: ………………… 2.3.d If renting the affected land, how much do you pay per month? Rp ………
3. Type of use of the affected land and building/house by the household 3.1 Use of land: [1] Residence [2] Commerce 3] Residence-cum-commerce [4] Agriculture [5] Other ……………….. 3.2 Use of main building/house: [1] Residence Only [2] Commerce [3] Residence-cum-business [4] Government building [5] Other …..(specify) 3.3 Do you have sufficient land outside of the COI to re-organize? [1] Yes [2] No 3.4 Do you have sufficient land outside the ROW to shift back? [1] Yes [2] No 3.5 Do you have other lands located elsewhere that are not affected by this project?
4. Information about Household members, income, and expenditure 4.1 Number of people living with the household: ……………………. 4.2 What is your household’s primary source of income? …………………………… 4.3 Distance to primary source of income from home: [1] at home [2] less than 1km [3] between 1 to 2km [4] between 2 to 4km [5] more than 4km 4.4 What is the average monthly income of your household? Rp …………… 4.5 What is the average monthly expenditure of your household? Rp ………… 4.6 Rank the following household expenses according to priority (1 = Top priority, 2 = Second priority, 3 = Third priority, 4 = Least priority): Food:____ Shelter (housing):_____ Health:_____ Education:______4.7 Profile of household members
Relati Monthly Physica Educa- Primary on Marital income Work l HH Sex Occupati with Age Status tion (Rp) place Conditi Members 2* on HH 3* 6* on 4* 5* head* 7* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
71 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
10 11 1* Relation with the HH head: [1] head [2] spouse [3] child [4] parents [5] other relatives 2* Sex: [M] male [F] female 3* Marital status: [1] single [2] married [3] divorced 4* Education attainment: [1] No education [2] Not completed Elementary [3] Completed Elementary [4] Not Completed High School [5] Completed High School [6] Not completed College [7] Finished College 5* Occupation: [1] Farming/ livestock [2] Business/Trader/Shop Owner [3] Driver / Laborer [4] Employee (private/government [5] Retired [6] Unemployed looking for work [7] Other: (specify) ………… 6* Workplace: [1] at home [2] less than 1km [3] between 1 to 2km [4] between 2 to 4km [5] more than 4km 7* Physical condition: [1] normal [2] disabled [3] very old/chronically ill
5. Loss of Business and Other Income (for AHs with affected businesses)
Number of With Business years the License? Average Type of business business has monthly gross (code) been Yes No income (Rp) operating? 1 2 2 3 6 5.1 5.2 5.3 Type of business: 1- Small mobile kiosk 4- Other services (e.g., barber) 2- Market stall / Retail store 5- Garage / vehicle repair / Tire repair 3- Restaurant / guest house 6- Other: …………….. (specify)
6. Sanitary Facilities 6.1 Where does the household get its water for drinking? [1] Pump well [2] Piped water from public utility company [3] Private water seller [4] Canal [5] Other______(specify) 6.2 Where does the household get its water for washing/bathing? [1] Pump well [2] Piped water from public utility company [3] Private water seller [4] Canal [5] Other______(specify) 6.3 Where does the household discharge/throw its used water? [1] Septic tank [2] Public drainage [3] Directly outside the house [4] Other______(specify) 6.4 What toilet facility does the household use? [1] Own toilet inside household property [2] Public toilet [3] In the field/open space [4] In the canal [5] Other______(specify) 6.5 How does the household get rid of its garbage? [1] Through the government garbage
72 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
collector [2] Burn it [3] Throw anywhere [4] Throw in the canal
73 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
INVENTORY OF LOSSES
1. Plot of Land, 2. Ground floor of the Structure
Left hand side of Embankment
(…….) from CL
0 m Centerline
Right hand side of Embankment
Sketch indicates: [1] Plot of land [2] Floor of the structure[3] other structure [4] Crop/trees
Add Sketches here
3. Other structures Affected Type of Unit LM/ Type of Unit L Structure m² Structure M/m²
4. Affected annual/perennial crops Crop Area (m²) Crop Area (m²)
Trees Number Trees Number
Total Number of Trees Total Number of Trees
74 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Date: ………………………
……………………………… Signature and name of enumerator
Certifying that Mr./Ms...... is truly the owner/occupier/user of the affected assets.
75 ADB Project No. 37049-02 INO: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP)
Appendix 6 Resettlement Plan for the WTC
76
Supplementary Appendix 2 - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Program (ICWRMP) (ADB TA4381-INO Phase III)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW FRAMEWORK (EARF)
7 December 2006
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS
I. INTRODUCTION...... 1 II. OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND PROJECTS ...... 2 A. STAKEHOLDER-DRIVEN PROGRAM FORMULATION ...... 2 B. ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA FOR PROGRAM DESIGN ...... 4 C. KEY PROGRAM COMPONENTS...... 5 III. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS...... 8 A. PPTA-PROPOSED BASIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...... 8 B. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ...... 9 C. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE ...... 11 III. EARF PROCEDURE AT THE TRANCHE LEVEL...... 12 A. TIERED SYSTEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ...... 12 B. CRITERIA FOR PROJECT INCLUSION INTO TRANCHE...... 12 C. PROCEDURE FOR TRANCHE-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT...... 13 IV. GOI AND ADB ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE PROJECT LEVEL ...... 14 A. CORRESPONDENCE OF AMDAL AND ADB ENVIRONMENT CATEGORIZATION OF PROJECTS .14 B. AMDAL PROCEDURES ...... 16 C. STAFFING AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS ...... 18 D. TOWARD A PROGRAMMATIC AMDAL FOR ICWRMP...... 18
ANNEXES ANNEX A. PROGRAM SETTING AND ENVIRONMENT ISSUES ...... 21 A. PHYSICAL SETTING...... 21 B. SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING...... 22 A. WATER AVAILABILITY/SCARCITY ...... 24 B. GROUNDWATER EXPLOITATION ...... 25 C. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION ...... 25 D. FLOODING AND WATER-RELATED DISASTERS...... 26 F. ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...... 28 G. POLICIES AND INSTITUTIONS ...... 30 ANNEX B. SEA METHODOLOGY AND LINK TO EARF ...... 32 ANNEX C. ICWRMP/ROADMAP ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ...... 33 A. REMEDIATION MEASURES FOR EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS ...... 33 1. Groundwater Management ...... 33 2. Basin-wide Water Quality Management ...... 34 3. Area Pollution Sources Management...... 36 4. Control of Pollution from Riverine Communities ...... 37 5. Rehabilitation of Degraded Watersheds ...... 38
B. CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT...... 39 1. Improved Basin Management Organization ...... 39 2. Improvement of Regulatory and Enforcement System ...... 39
i
3. New Management Strategies (e.g., Raw Water and Wastewater Pricing) ...... 41 4. Water Quality Monitoring...... 42 5. Development of Database and Decision Support Tools...... 43
C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION AND MONITORING MEASURES...... 44 ANNEX D. TEMPLATE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN. 48 ANNEX E. EXCERPTS FROM TRANCHE 1 IEE ILLUSTRATING EMMP...... 49 ANNEX F. AMDAL GUIDELINES ...... 55 A. TOR OF ANDAL...... 55 B. ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ANDAL)...... 55 C. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (UKL)...... 56 D. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (UPL)...... 56 REFERENCES ...... 58
TABLES AND FIGURES
Table 1. Environmental Criteria Used in Initial Project Identification...... 3 Table 2. Criteria for Program Design and Project Identification ...... 4 Table 3. Program Areas and Aspects ...... 5 Table 4. Project Environmental Impact Categories ...... 6 Table 5. Proposed Roles for Basin Organizations...... 9 Table 6. Proposed Assignment of Basin Management Responsibilities ...... 10 Table 7. Correspondence of ADB and AMDAL Project Categories...... 15 Table 8. Relevant Project Types Required to Comply with EIA-ANDAL ...... 16
Figure 1. Problem Tree ...... 3 Figure 2. Proposed Composition of the Citarum Basin Council ...... 9 Figure 3. SEA and EARF Link ...... 12 Figure 4. Process Flow of AMDAL...... 20
ii
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Indonesia Environmental Impact Assessment System) ANDAL Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (AMDAL Environmental Impact Analysis) BAPPEDA Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Provincial Development Planning Board) BAPEDAL Badan Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan (Agency for Control over Environmental Impacts) BAPEDALDA Badan Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan Daerah (Regional Agency for Control over Environmental Impacts) BAPPENAS Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency) BB Balai Besar (Basin Management Organization) BLU Badan Layanan Umum (Public Service Institution) BWRC Basin Water Resources Council BPLHD Badan Pengendalian Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (Provincial Level Environmental Management Agency) BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand CBWRC Citarum Basin Water Resources Council COD Chemical Oxygen Demand DGWR Directorate General of Water Resources DKI Daerah Khusus Ibukota (Metropolitan Jakarta) DLH Dinas Lingkungan-Hidup (District Environment Protection Agency) DMI Domestic, Municipal and Industrial (water supply) DO Dissolved Oxygen DPU Departemen Pekerjaan Umum (Ministry of Public Works) EA Executing Agency/ Environmental Assessment EARF Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan EMO Environmental Management Office EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System EMU Environmental Management Unit ETC Saluran Tarum Timur (East Tarum Canal) GEF Global Environment Facility GOI Government of Indonesia GR Peraturan Pemerintah = PP (Government Regulation) HATHI Himpunan Ahli Tehnik Hidrolika Indonesia (Indonesian Association on Hydraulic Engineering) IA Implementing Agency ICWRMP Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Project IEC Information, Education and Communication IEE Initial Environmental Examination IPC Indonesia Power Corporation IPM Integrated Pest Management ITB Institut Teknologi Bandung (Bandung Institute of Technology) IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
iii
KA-ANDAL Kerangka Acuan ANDAL (Terms of Reference for ANDAL Study) MENLH Kementerian Negara bidang Lingkungan Hidup (Ministry of Environment) MENPAN Kementerian Negara bidang Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara (Ministry of State Apparatus) MFF Multi-tranche Financing Facility MOE Ministry of Environment MOF Ministry of Finance MOHA Ministry of Home Affairs NGO Non-Government Organization NTC Saluran Tarum Utara (North Tarum Canal) O&M Operation and Maintenance PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl PDAM Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (District Water Supply Company) PMU Program Management Unit PIU Project Implementation Unit PJB Pembangkit Listrik Jawa – Bali (Jawa-Bali Power Corporation) PJT II Perum Jasa Tirta II (Jasa Tirta Public Corporation II) PLN Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Indonesia State Power Corporation) PMC Project Management Consultant PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance PPTPA Basin Water Resources Management Implementing Committee PROKASIH Program Kali Bersih (Clean Rivers Program) PROPER Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan (Program for Pollution Control Evaluation and Rating) PTPA Provincial Water Resources Management Committee R&D Research and Development RKL Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environmental Management Plan) RPL Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan (Environmental Monitoring Plan) SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SRI System of Rice Intensification SS Suspended Sediment SUPERKASIH Surat Pernyataan Kali Bersih (Expanded Clean Rivers Program) SWS Satuan Wilayah Sungai (River Basin Regional Unit) TOR Kerangka Acuan (Terms of Reference) TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan (AMDAL Environmental Management Efforts) UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan (AMDAL Environmental Monitoring Efforts) UPLDP Upper Plantation and Land Development Project WB World Bank WRMP Water Resource Management Project WTC Saluran Tarum Barat (West Tarum Canal) WUA Water Users Association WWF World Wildlife Fund
iv
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW FRAMEWORK (EARF) FOR THE INTEGRATED CITARUM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (ICWRMP)
I. INTRODUCTION
1. ICWRMP is a 15-year program designed to address the multiple and inter-related concerns of water supply sustainability and water quality degradation within the Citarum river basin. The basin covers 13,000 square kilometers and is home to 10 million people. It is considered one of the most strategically important for Indonesia—the basin supplies 80% of Jakarta’s water needs, provides irrigation for 240,000 ha, and generates 1,400 MW of electricity. Inadequate institutional arrangements, deteriorating infrastructure, competing water demands, and rapid urban and industrial growth have led to water supply shortages and unhealthy environmental conditions throughout the basin, hence the need for an integrated program intervention. The program setting and baseline environment assessment is described in Annex A.
2. With assistance from ADB, the Ministry of Public Works’ Directorate General for Water Resources prepared a strategic plan (also referred to as “road map”) for the Citarum basin’s integrated development and management. The goal is sustainable management of water resources for economic and social development. The immediate objective is to improve water availability and capacity for integrated/participatory water resources management. The roadmap is considered the GOI’s basin strategic plan—vital for facilitating implementation of the recently passed law on water (Law #7/20004), and for programming and coordinating assistance from various sources. Key elements of the road map are to be implemented with assistance from ADB through a Multi- tranche Financing Facility (MFF), in turn divided into several packages or tranches.
3. Described below are the criteria used in formulating the road map’s key interventions and the resulting program areas/themes—including projects identified under each key area--developed in consultation with basin stakeholders.
4. A strategic environmental assessment (SEA) was carried out in parallel with the basin road map formulation (refer to methodology in Annex B). The SEA’s aim was to systematically integrate environmental management concerns into the basin strategy/plan and to provide a tiered approach to environmental assessment and planning—starting at the program (basin) level, then the tranche (package) level, and finally the project or subproject level.
5. Through the SEA, a strategic environmental management plan (EMP) was developed as an integral part of the roadmap. The EMP is divided into three sets of program interventions: (i) activities to remediate existing environment problems that significantly impact water supply and quality, and measures to enhance overall environment quality; (ii) activities to strengthen environmental management capacity (i.e., regulatory enforcement, complementary policy instruments, monitoring system, databases and decision support tools), and (iii) activities to mitigate possible adverse environmental impacts of some roadmap projects—particularly those under the water utilization sub-program/component. (Refer to Annex C)
6. The first two EMP components above (i.e., environment remediation/enhancement and capacity strengthening interventions) have been incorporated directly into the program design as well as in the Tranche 1 package. The third EMP component (i.e., mitigation measures for possible adverse impacts of some projects) is the focus of this report on environmental assessment and review framework (EARF), intended to guide environmental assessments of tranche packages (sub- program level) and individual projects/subprojects (project level)—specifically those included in the MFF or ADB-assisted part of the roadmap. The EARF’s use is to ensure: (i) that project level assessments take into consideration the broader environment management issues/objectives in the basin and the implications in terms of interactive and cumulative environmental effects, and (ii)
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 1 ICWRMP EARF that projects comply with ADB’s EIA guidelines and GOI (AMDAL) environmental review and regulatory clearance requirements for individual projects.
7. This report was prepared as part of the Phase 3 Project Preparatory Technical Assistance to design the ICWRMP and ADB/MFF Tranche 1 package. It builds upon the earlier environmental assessment conducted during PPTA Phases 1 and 2 by Nippon Koie Co. Ltd. The report follows ADB’s guidelines for EARF of sector-type programs and contains: (i) an overview of the types of projects included in the basin roadmap; (ii) environment criteria used for project identification and selection of projects for inclusion in the ADB/MFF Tranche 1 package; (iii) institutional arrangements/responsibilities for program implementation and conduct of follow-on environmental assessments at the tranche-level and project level; (iv) procedures for environmental screening and initial impact assessment of projects under the tranche packages; (v) description of Indonesia environmental assessment and review procedures (AMDAL) to be used in project level assessments, including justification/confirmation that these procedures conform with ADB’s guidelines and safeguards.1
II. OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND PROJECTS
A. Stakeholder-driven Program Formulation
8. Stakeholders in water resource and environment management within the Citrum basin are numerous and diverse. They include: (i) national and regional policy/planning bodies (BAPPENAS, BAPPEDA , Public Works Ministry, Environment Ministry, Agriculture Ministry, Forest Ministry); (ii) basin resource managers and infrastructure operators (DGWR, Citarum River Basin Development Office, Balai PSDA of West Java Province, PJT II); (iii) regulators (BPLHD, District governments and their respective licensing and environmental service/protection agencies); (iv) water users (PDAMs that supply municipal water, industries, Indonesia Power which generates electricity from the Saguling and Cirata hydropower plants, numerous households, and farmers) and (v) interest groups (NGOs such as LMDH, WPL, PHBM, FPL, YHD; academic institutions such as the Bandung Institute of Technology, and professional organizations such as the Indonesian Association of Hydraulic Engineers). Strong stakeholder interest in the program has considerably influenced its evolution during the course of the PPTA.
9. During PPTA Phase 1, an assessment of the water resource and environment management problems in the basin was conducted by the PPTA Team, and this was used to draw up a package of measures to counter the primary causes of the problems. A “problem tree” analysis identified 11 main problems, 27 causes and 97 countermeasures. The countermeasures were then grouped into a long list of 18 projects. These were then ranked using multiple criteria that took into account social, environmental, economic-financial, institutional and technical considerations. The environmental criteria used during this initial selection/prioritization are listed in Table 1.
10. During Phase 2, detailed studies were carried out on the priority projects identified: specifically the rehabilitation of the Jatiluhur Irrigation System main canals, with the West Tarum Canal as the immediate priority due to its importance for Jakarta’s raw water supply.
1 Staffing/budgeting requirements for the project level environmental assessments and AMDAL review are provided in report on the Tranche 1 IEE.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 2 ICWRMP EARF
Table 1. Environmental Criteria Used in Initial Project Identification B. Environmental Issues Description Measurement Indicator 1 Conservation of resources Reduced consumption of natural resources Reduction in water consumption, m3/s, or Reduction in petroleum consumption, '000 m3/yr 2 Water quality Improvement of raw water quality Decreased concentration of BOD, mg/l 3 Water quantity River maintenance flow Increase in base flow, m3/s 4 Flora and fauna Minimized negative impact on flora and fauna Increase in base flow in dry season, m3/s 5 Land pollution Minimized land pollution Decrease in area affected, ha. No. of gas concentrations reduced out of 3 kinds of 6 Air pollution Concentration of NOx (NO , NO ) and SOx and H S 2 3 2 gases 7 Global environment Minimized concentration of CO2 and methane gas Increase in greened area, ha. 8 Cultural heritage Minimized disruption of cultural heritage No. of heritage affected 9 Conservation of nature Conservation of forests, wetlands Increase in forest or wetland, ha 10 Surface soil Minimized damage to fertile soil Decrease in area damaged, ha.
Source: PPTA Phase 1, Interim Report
11. However, in the course of completing Phase 2, the PPTA recommendations came under criticism for what some stakeholders claimed was an over-emphasis on physical (engineering) issues and a perceived bias in favor of the lower basin (the location of the top-priority system improvement project). One criticism was that, since the project is an integrated approach, policy and institutional concerns should also be prioritized. Stakeholders from Bandung, in particular, pressed for issues affecting their part of the upper basin to also be prioritized. To address stakeholder concerns, a re-assessment of the basin water resources and environment management problems was done, with the revised problem-tree shown in Figure 1 validated by stakeholders.
Figure 1. Problem Tree
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 3 ICWRMP EARF
12. From the problem assessment, new projects were identified. From the original list of 18 projects the expanded program grew to more than 60 possible projects, reflecting clamor by stakeholders for a truly integrated approach to basin management – inclusive (in being able to address issues raised by multiple stakeholders in different parts of the basin) and holistic (in terms of scope of interventions).
B. Environmental Criteria for Program Design
13. Environmental criteria and sustainability considerations used in program design included: (i) balanced concern for water quantity and water quality management, including remediation of existing pollution problems; (ii) importance of institutional capacity development and the vital importance of a strong regulatory enforcement capacity; (iii) concern for ecological protection beyond serving human use values; (iv) community participation and empowerment; and (v) need for economic instruments and pricing mechanism to influence water use and pollution behavior. The application of these criteria is explained in Table 2.
Table 2. Criteria for Program Design and Project Identification Criteria Rationale and Indicators
Balanced concern for Quantitative water supply concerns (for irrigation, power generation and urban water supply) water quantity and quality are closely tied up with issues related to water quality and environment protection. These management, including aspects are interwoven as reflected in the resource management problems affecting the remediation and Citarum basin. As described in the preceding assessment, poor water quality is making the enhancement of available water unfit for use—as in the case of Bandung where the polluted condition of the environment quality nearby Saguling reservoir prevents its use for urban water supply. Here, the available surface water now rendered unfit for use because of pollution forces excessive reliance on groundwater leading to unsustainable mining of the water resource. In turn, lack of protection for the watersheds (to combat pollution and erosion) is the principal cause of water quality degradation. Given this context, an essential indicator of effectiveness and sustainability for the roadmap is its ability to balance concerns for water utilization with an equal concern for water quality and environment protection.
Capacity development for The need to manage water resources within an integrated framework is occurring at a time integrated water when authorities and administrative bodies mandated to manage the resource are still resources and grappling with organizational and adjustment problems. District governments tasked to take environmental on resource and environmental management functions in the wake of the 1999 management decentralization are still weak in their planning, regulation and enforcement capacities. Institution-building is thus an important criteria for roadmap sustainability. The relevant development indicator is inclusion of capacity development activities, not only for the local government implementing units but also for an apex management body that should provide policy direction and coordination of basin-wide planning and implementation.
Broader program concern A holistic management approach, in addition to simultaneously addressing water quantity and to include ecological quality concerns, also needs to give importance to the management of the basin for the protection values protection of biodiversity in the watersheds and aquatic ecosystems. Water utilization objectives in basin management are still predominantly driven by human use considerations. For instance, the existing water classification scheme is biased toward use of water to meet drinking, recreation, irrigation, fishing and industrial uses. A balanced approach to basin management that addresses human use values alongside ecological values is an important criteria for program design. An program design indicator is inclusion into the roadmap of ecological protection components whose value/importance goes beyond helping ensure sustainability of water supplies for human benefit.
Community Entities responsible for misusing or impacting water resources are not just industrial or empowerment for water institutional entities but also numerous individual households and communities. Unlike and environment industrial entities that can be managed through regulation and incentives, communities are management beyond the reach of conventional controls and they impact the water system in small, often unnoticed ways -- but whose cumulative result is highly significant. Households and farms are the primary source of oxygen-depleting pollutants in the basin, including nutrient pollutants responsible for eutrophication. And much of the eroded soil brought down from the watershed come from smallholder farms cultivating steep slopes. Their unsustainable practices are due to lack of know-how, resources and options (e.g., for viable upland farming, or safe waste disposal). The roadmap thus needs to address their needs, and one indicator of program effectiveness and sustainability is inclusion of components aimed at community participation and empowerment.
Strengthened Strengthening traditional “command and control systems" is essential to achieving water environmental regulatory resources management objectives. Indonesia’s highly innovative and effective voluntary structure industrial wastewater emissions reduction program, PROKASIH launched in 1989, together
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 4 ICWRMP EARF
with PROPER in 1993, have brought about large declines in biological oxygen demand loads. However, these voluntary programs were essentially devised to get around a weak capacity for command and control regulation. They do not encompass the true number of polluters who need to be controlled, and they are not a permanent substitute for establishing an institutionalized environmental regulatory and enforcement system. Thus, a criterion for program design is need for strengthening regulatory enforcement as a foundation of sustainable water quality management. This includes strengthening ability to impose sanctions on polluters.
Use of economic An essential aspect of IWRM is a call for water to be treated as an economic resource. instruments for managing Economic incentives that induce voluntary restraint on water use and water pollution are tools water use and polluting that should complement traditional command-and-control mechanisms. Proper pricing does activities not necessarily mean getting the prices exactly "right" in terms of economic theories. It is mainly an application of management principle—that water is not a free resource and that pricing is an efficient way of capturing scarcity values and competition among users.
C. Key Program Components
14. The resulting stakeholder-driven program package covers—in addition to physical development works involving water resource development and infrastructure improvements— institutional/policy reforms, water allocation and decision support systems, capacity-building and community involvement. In this context, environmental aspects are incorporated into the roadmap both as pro-active measures to protect environmental values (e.g., bio-diversity) as well as safeguards for possible adverse impacts of some of the roadmap elements. In particular, water resources development or utilization activities require safeguards to mitigate potential and inadvertent adverse impacts (e.g., disposal of sediments removed from canals to be dredged). Many of the project ideas in the resulting roadmap are environmental management and enhancement measures. Key program areas and aspects are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Program Areas and Aspects Component Aspects and Activities
Institutions and The term “institutions” is used in its broadest sense to refer to organizations, legislation, policies and Planning for IWRM other protocols that define relations among organizations. Aspects include: (i) organization restructuring; (ii) organizational capacity building; (iii) policy development; (iv) Legislation; (v) planning for IWRM; (vi) regulation such as licensing of water utilization and wastewater discharge; (vi) setting of water tariffs; (vii) institutions for participatory irrigation management.
Water Resource Includes activities related to exploiting water resources – that is, increasing water availability and Development and operating and maintaining infrastructure. Aspects covered are: (i) project planning, including Management “master planning” (that is, planning that focuses on development of infrastructure, and distinct from broader basin planning); (ii) construction of infrastructure for storing and delivering water (including reservoirs, canals and pipeline systems); (iii) operation and maintenance of infrastructure; (iv) promoting efficient and effective utilization of water; (v) drilling of wells for use of groundwater.
Water Sharing Covers the process of establishing and protecting water rights and allocating water among competing uses and users, as well as setting priorities for water entitlement during times of shortage. Such allocations may be among sectors (irrigation, urban water supply and hydropower, for example), or geographically (upstream/ downstream and inter-basin transfers).
Environmental Included here are activities for the protection of the environment (that have an impact on water Protection management) and rehabilitation of already degraded environments. Aspects cover combination of structural and non-structural measures that include infrastructure (e.g., gully plugs), improved institutional (regulatory) arrangements, and community participation. Provisions for mitigating the potential adverse effects of water development projects (for example, the impacts of dredging) are built into the projects themselves. The enhancement of environment management capacity in the organizations charged with this responsibility is included under the institutional key area. Water quality and environmental monitoring and research activities are included in “Data, Information and Decision Support”. Legislation and other regulatory processes aimed at minimizing adverse impacts are included in an environment assessment and review procedure, and therefore come under “institutions”.
Disaster Covers disasters related to water, such as floods and mud flows. While drought must also be Management classified as a water-related disaster, the strategic response to drought mitigation is through increasing water availability, which is included above under the water resource development key area. Activities related to disaster management under this definition include: (i) planning and construction of structural measures to control flood and mud flows, such as levees (dikes), flood control reservoirs; and (ii) development and implementation of disaster preparedness plans.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 5 ICWRMP EARF
Component Aspects and Activities
Community This key area includes: (i) education and awareness raising (capacity building) of communities and Empowerment individuals on water management issues; (ii) activities aimed at providing information to all that need it on water resource management and related activities; (iii) implementing measures to facilitate participation of the community in water planning and management; and (iv) developing community-based “self-help” programs and specific projects to provide local improvement in water supply, the environment, water quality and so on.
Data and Covered here are: (i) data collection, including: surface and groundwater quantity and quality; other Information natural resources data, such as soils, geology, land cover, ecosystems and so on; and socio- economic data, such as population, poverty, land use, and so on; (ii) data archiving and management, including collation of data from various sources, validation, computerization; (iii) data sharing and dissemination among government agencies, research establishments and so on, and providing public access to data; (iv) research to increase knowledge in such fields as catchment processes, demography, and so on, as well as the development of new technologies for water conservation and environmental protection; (v) development and implementation of decision support tools, including GIS systems, hydrologic and hydraulic models, and other analytical tools.
D. Environmental Impact Categories of Projects
15. Error! Reference source not found. presents a preliminary classification of the projects according to nature and potential significance of environmental impacts using ADB’s categorization system. • Category A: Projects with potential for significant adverse environmental impacts. • Category B: Projects judged to have some adverse environmental impacts, but of lesser degree and/or significance than those for category A projects. • Category C: Projects unlikely to have adverse environmental impacts. 16. In Error! Reference source not found., some projects are classified as A or B, and B or C. This is because these projects as currently identified in the roadmap are still mainly project ideas. Their actual categorization will depend on the project specifications (scheme, engineering design, size or scale of the project, location) to follow. The latter are to be specified during the feasibility planning of each project (as packaged under each tranche). For instance, the implementation of the bulk water supply alternative for Bandung would be a Category A project if inter-basin water transfer was selected. On the other hand, it would be Category B if the project strategy adopted is watershed rehabilitation or an approach involving reallocation of irrigation water for municipal use (e.g., through SRI). It is also not possible at this stage to classify the projects according the GOI’s AMDAL classification as the latter is based on numerical project size categories that are not yet known at this stage.
Table 4. Project Environmental Impact Categories AREA PROJECT CATEGORY Institutions Institutional strengthening for integrated water resources management C and Planning Policy development for appropriate water pricing, water allocation and balanced stakeholder for IWRM C participation Development of an enhanced Citarum River Basin Plan for IWRM C Improvements to organizational capacity for environmental assessment C Water Upgrading of Water Source for Irrigation (Upper Cipunegara) A Resource Upgrading of Water Source for Irrigation (Cipancuh) A Development and Upgrading of Water Source for Irrigation (Ciherang) A Management Cisankuy Irrigation Improvement B Raising of Cirata Dam A Investigation of bulk water supply options for Bandung urban area C Implementation of preferred bulk water supply alternatives for Bandung urban area A or B Investigation of bulk water supply options for Bekasi and Karawang C
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 6 ICWRMP EARF
Implementation of preferred bulk water supply alternatives for Bekasi and Karawang A or B Upgrading of water source for Bandung and other uses by inter-basin transfer A Development of the surface water of the upper catchment of the Cikapundung River A Construction of Sukawana Reservior on the Cimahi River A Development of an action plan for sustainable groundwater management in the Citarum C River Basin Implementation of the action plan for sustainable groundwater management C Improved implementation of regulations for sustainable groundwater management in C Bandung Improvement of Raw Water Supply for Bandung B or C Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal for improved water resource utilization B West Tarum “Canal 2” Project A or B Irrigation Modernisation – West Tarum Canal C System Service Improvement and Irrigation Modernisation – East Tarum Canal B or C System Service Improvement and Irrigation Modernisation – North Tarum Canal B or C Development of strategies and options for demand management and water conservation C with respect to industrial and domestic use Development of improved asset management and O&M procedures for hydraulic C infrastructure Rajamandala Run-of-River Power Plant (Citarum River below Saguling Reservoir) A or B Curug Run-of-River Power Plant A or B Water Review of allocation priorities and optimization of operating rules for key sub-basins, C Sharing including the operation of the river/ reservoir system as a whole Environment Development and implementation of conservation action plans for model conservation C Protection villages in Citarum River Basin Watershed management community educational program for CRB C Productive Reforestation (1): C Spatial planning for reforestation Productive Reforestation (2): C Implementation Improvement to village land tenure arrangements with Perum Perhutani C Alternative livelihoods for displaced upland forest villagers C Protected area management in CRB C Alternative finance mechanisms for sustainable community watershed management C Riparian zone management to reduce sediment loads in rivers C Integrated Erosion Management for Upper Bekasi River, Upper Citarum River and Upper C Cipunegara River Development and (initial) implementation of a River Quality Improvement Action Strategy C Plan for the basin Development and (initial) implementation of a Water Pollution Control Plan for the Bandung C area Sewerage and wastewater treatment upstream of Saguling Reservoir A or B Development and (initial) implementation of a Water Pollution Control Plan for the Bekasi C and Karawang areas Development and implementation of a solid waste management strategy and action plans B or C for the Bandung, Bekasi, Cikarang and Karawang areas Introduction of System Rice Intensification (SRI) practices in the upper and lower basin to C conserve water and improve productivity Improvement in water quality in Saguling, Cirata and Jatiluhur Reservoirs through C management of fish farming and other polluting activities Planning and Implementation of ICZM Action Plan C Disaster Integrated Management of Water-Related Disaster (basin-wide) C Management Disaster (mud flow and landslide) management for Upper Bekasi River, Upper Citarum River C and Upper Cipunegara River
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 7 ICWRMP EARF
Strategic options for flood mitigation in Bandung C Implementing recommended options for flood mitigation in Bandung A or B Review of dam safety for dams in the basin C Community Development of an Information, Awareness and Education Strategy (IEAS) for capacity C Empower- building of communities across the basin ment Implementation of the Information, Awareness and Education Strategy C Support for community- and NGO-driven initiatives for improved water and catchment management for livelihood improvement, including rural water supply and sanitation for C riparian communities Establishment of, and ongoing support for a Stakeholder Forum for Bandung Sub-Basin C Data and Improvements to water quality monitoring in rivers and reservoirs C Information Improvements to groundwater monitoring network in the Bandung area C Improvements to water and natural resource data management and dissemination C Land degradation and biodiversity database for CRB C Development of an on-line flow forecasting system on unregulated rivers C Establishment of an annual “state of the basin” report C Development of an integrated water quality and quantity model for basin planning studies, C and a decision support tool for improved policy and decision making Institutional strengthening and capacity building of water research organizations C Benchmarking of water resource data collection and management agencies C
III. Institutional Arrangements
A. PPTA-Proposed Basin Management System
17. The Water Law states that the coordinating institution for the basin—the Citarum Basin Water Resources Council (CBWRC)--will assume “the main task of preparing and formulating water resources policies and strategies.” This role does not include final authority to approve the policies or strategies themselves, which remains with the relevant authority—in this case, the Ministry of Public Works. The regulatory authorities for environmental management would still be the environment protection agencies at national, provincial or district levels depending on the jurisdiction where activities are located.
18. In the current draft of the Presidential Decree on Organizational Structure and Work Programs of Coordinating Institutions for the water law implementation, the terminology used for the Basin Council is Tim Koordinasi PDSA which creates the impression of a mere discussion forum rather than as a policy formulation body. It has been suggested that the basin council be modeled after the existing PTPA and PPTPA, and that what remains to be changed in them is for representation of non-governmental organizations to be increased as mandated under the water law. However, the existing PTPA and PPTPA have mainly served as discussion forums focused on developing recommendations on issues related to irrigation and flood/drought management, and as such may not be appropriate models for the basin council whose scope of concern would be considerably larger.
19. The PPTA Phase 3 institutional study recommended that the basin council to be set up should go beyond the current scope of the PTPA and PPTPA and that it should tackle a broader scope encompassing watershed management, remediation of groundwater over-use, pollution load reduction, demand side management, and mechanisms for sustainable financing of water infrastructure . This necessitates adopting a modality that moves beyond that of a discussion forum to a policy formulating body. This role would also be reflected in the name of the organization using terminology such as Council or Board (Dewan) rather than that of ‘Coordination Team’ (Tim Koordinasi). Capacity building for the basin council is a key program component under Tranche 1. The proposed structure and composition of the council is shown in Figure 2.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 8 ICWRMP EARF
Figure 2. Proposed Composition of the Citarum Basin Council
B. Roles and Responsibilities
20. The CBWRC would prepare and formulate draft policies and strategies covering the full range of IWRM issues– effectively a new and integrated master plan for the basin. It would also monitor and review their implementation. Sub-committees (as standing bodies or temporary groups) could cover task groups on: watershed management, environment/water quality improvement, disaster management, new water supply development, dispute resolution related to water sharing, demand side management, infrastructure operations, public awareness and communications.
21. Below the basin council are the regulation/enforcement agencies and the operational management bodies. Responsibilities for policy development, regulation and management in the Basin are outlined in Table 5. As noted earlier, the responsibility for environmental regulation would remain with the national, provincial and district environmental protection units. The following section deals with the aspect of management.
Table 5. Proposed Roles for Basin Organizations Policy development and strategic planning Basin Water Resources Council Existing line agencies at national, provincial and Regulation and enforcement district levels Management A combination of public agencies (at national, basin, • Strategic basin manager provincial and district levels), state owned enterprises, • System operators and Water User Associations (WUA)
22. The PPTA study underscored the importance of separating the roles of basin manager and that of system operator, and the need to shift focus from project development to that of management. The water resources infrastructure in basin is already largely developed and future challenges have more to do with sustainable management, distribution of benefits, and water quality.
23. The current intention, although not yet confirmed by the Ministry for Efficient Use of State Apparatus (MENPAN), is for the establishment of a ‘Technical Implementation Office to be referred to as the Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (BBWS). The function of the Balai Besar would be to “manage water resources covering planning, construction, operation and maintenance in the
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 9 ICWRMP EARF framework of conservation of water resources, efficient use of water resources and control of water damaging risks in river areas.”
24. Issues still being considered include the resulting overlap of responsibilities for operation and maintenance, and the need for clear lines of responsibility between the Balai Besar , PJT II and the existing Citarum River Basin Development Project (Proyek Citarum, which is supposed to develop new infrastructure and implement rehabilitation projects). It has been proposed that the Balai Besar act the “strategic basin manager”and implementor of policy directions set by the basin council encompassing all activities in the roadmap (including new infrastructure development and rehabilitation activities, thus absorbing the function of Proyek Citarum). PJT II would focus on the role of “operator” and specifically as a supply of bulk water.2
25. Main functions of the Balai Besar are to: (i) act as secretariat for the basin council; (ii) prepare strategic plans and manage the basin’s water resources based on policy guidance from the council; (iii) plan, commission and oversee rehabilitation works and new infrastructure development; (iv) commission/oversee the daily operation and maintenance of water resources infrastructure by various “operators”; (v) delegate to province or district where appropriate (e,g., management of secondary irrigation canals), and (vi) promote public awareness and involvement. The proposed assignment of basin management responsibilities is shown in Table 6.
Table 6. Proposed Assignment of Basin Management Responsibilities Source of budget Type of Strategic management Operator : conduct of daily or income to infrastructure Location and oversight O&M activities cover O&M Contracted to PJT II or new Bulk water & Existing area of Balai Besar public body (BLU) by Balai electricity PJT II* Besar revenues, ABPN River Newly established BLU (or headwords Outside area Bulk water possibly direct management covered by PJT Balai Besar revenues and by subsidiary of Balai Besar) II ABPN
Contracted to PJT II or BLU Bulk water & by Balai Besar or some electricity WTC, ETC, NTC Balai Besar Main Systems sections contracted to private revenues and >3,000ha sector ABPN Other irrigation Delegated to Province PSDA Balai Besar ABPN areas by Balai Besar Delegated to Province PSDA >3000 ha Balai Besar ABPN Secondary by Balai Besar canals 1000 to 3000 ha, Province (DPU) Province PSDA (UPTD) APBD < 1000 ha District (DPU) District PSDA District Budget Tertiary District or Province WUAs Water Users Canals Electricity Saguling Basin Council** Indonesia Power revenues Electricity Hydropower Cirata Basin Council** PJB revenues Electricity Djuanda Basin Council* PJT II or BLU revenues * PJT II or a new BLU would become a supplier of bulk water to irrigation areas at the head of the secondary canal and relinquish involvement in irrigation management.3 Under the proposed arrangement, operation and maintenance of secondary canals currently under PJT II control would be delegated to provincial and district level water resources services depending on size and scale. This delegation would include areas greater than 3,000ha. ** Operation of hydropower facilities would be subject to operating rules agreed by the Basin Council
26. To ensure that the project development and project implementation functions of the Balai Besar do not dominate its other management and coordination activities, an option is to separate
2 In the event that a solution to this issue or overlapping roles cannot be found, there is a further possibility that the functions of the two organizations could be undertaken by a newly formed Public Service Institution (Badan Layanaan Umum). 3 Note that partial government funding for the ‘public service obligation’ elements related to delivery of bulk water for irrigation may be required and is permissible for a state owned corporation Act 19/2000
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 10 ICWRMP EARF the project development functions and assign these to a separate Project Implementation Unit (PIU) which could either remain under DGWR or be a unit under the Balai Besar. In either case, the Balai Besar would act as the overall Program Management Unit (PMU) under which environmental management tasks will be coordinated.
C. Environmental Management Office
27. Based on the PPTA-proposed institutional set up above, the Balai Besar PMU would establish an Environmental Management Office (EMO) that would play a lead role in implementing the EARF provisions of program and requirements for AMDAL compliance as described in the next section. 28. The EMO shall be manned by a local environment management specialist and a water quality specialist who would also be involved in implementing the water quality improvement project (a component of the tranche package). An international environment and water quality management (program) consultant will also be provided on an intermittent basis to assist in capacity building and to advise on technical issues. Capacity-building activities and budget, for environmental management, in particular for training and equipment needs related to managing water quality, are incorporated into the component projects on water quality improvement and watershed rehabilitation. Note that the preparation of AMDAL-required studies will be contracted to local consultants (as explained in Chapter III). 29. The main tasks of the EMO are as follows: • Oversee implementation of the environmental management and monitoring plan, and ensure that institutional arrangements and responsibilities are followed; • Consolidate environmental performance and impact monitoring reports on behalf of the Balai Besar, for submission to the basin council, provincial and district environment units, relevant government ministries, and public information channels; • Advise the PMU on environmental aspects and impacts of projects, including those requiring corrective action during project implementation; • Assist the PMU in coordinating with the MOE and provincial/district environment agencies for the AMDAL compliance of projects (further described below); • Assist the PMU in drawing up terms of reference for the AMDAL teams, based on assessment scope agreed with the responsible AMDAL oversight agency; • Update the information system on the basin’s baseline environment conditions, and advise/assist project-based AMDAL teams to adopt a basin approach for project impact assessment; • Prepare the environmental assessment for Tranche 2 of the program.
30. The EMO, through a program management consultant, will also develop environmental management guidelines/templates for types of projects identified in the roadmap. These include guidelines (for screening, assessment, mitigation, monitoring) relevant to bulk water source development, water supply and sanitation projects, river training/channeling or dredging works, agro-ecosystem improvement in watersheds, and improvement of irrigation and drainage facilities. The program consultant shall train PMU-EMO staff in using the guidelines, not only to facilitate conduct of assessments but also to ensure that safeguards identified in the guidelines are actually built into the project designs.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 11 ICWRMP EARF
III. EARF Procedure at the Tranche Level
A. Tiered System for Environmental Assessment
31. As mentioned, in addition to mainstreaming environment concerns in program design, the SEA was intended to also provide for a tiered approach to environmental impact assessment: at the strategic/roadmap level, tranche (package) level, and project level. The EARF is focused on procedures for environmental assessment at the trance and project levels, inasmuch as the SEA already provided an assessment at the level of the basin program and produced a strategic environmental management plan already built into the roadmap. Figure 3 clarifies the EARF scope.
Figure 3. SEA and EARF Link
32. It should be noted that the approach in packaging the roadmap elements into tranches (for the ADB-MFF portion) is such that the tranches do not have the effect of sub-dividing the basin into separate areas or selecting only a thematic aspect of the program. That is, the program area covered by each MFF tranche is still the entire basin, and—consistent with the integrated nature of the roadmap/program—the composition of projects under each tranche combines institutional, environmental, and infrastructural elements to reflect the integrated program. Thus, each tranche is a microcosm of the entire program, and the baseline environmental assessment for the program applies to that of the tranche. As such, the basinwide environmental baseline should be updated as each tranche comes into stream.
B. Criteria for Project Inclusion into Tranche
33. ADB would select components or projects within the overall roadmap—for inclusion in the MFF package--that are consistent with the bank’s country strategy for Indonesia and its development assistance thrust (notably poverty alleviation), as well as specific screening criteria that include environmental considerations.
34. For packaging of the MFF Tranche 1, the following criteria for project inclusion were adapted, as validated by basin stakeholders:
• Project included in the tranche package must have a have high government priority; • Tranche package must together cover a range of key program aspects/areas and not concentrate on a single key area;
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 12 ICWRMP EARF
• Tranche package must together address issues affecting the upper basin as well as lower basin; • Projects must be supported by a range of stakeholder groups, and not only by “special interest” groups; • The tranche package must have built-in environmental and social safeguards; • Projects in the package must be at a sufficiently advanced stage of preparation (with feasibility studies) so that they can be commenced with minimal delay; and • Must not be proposed for funding by other donors.
35. The SEA recommended that—in addition to the environmental management components already built into the program design--the following criteria be adopted as additional environmental safeguards/provisions in screening projects for inclusion in each MFF tranche package. As such, these criteria are intended to reflect ADB’s environmental policy guidelines.
• Project design should adhere to the environmental management guidelines reflected in the program SEA and Tranche IEE (, e.g., measures for proper disposal of dredged materials, which should be incorporated also in tender documents and construction work programs). • Projects should take advantage of opportunities to expand design concepts to generate complementary environmental benefits, e.g., combining upland agro-ecosystem improvement (to control erosion) with measures to link fragmented forest patches through re-vegetation along riverine corridors or to generate carbon credits from reforestation projects as financial incentive for participating communities. • If there are past projects that have caused adverse environmental impacts (e.g., impact of irrigation diversions on reducing dry season flows needed for river flushing), then design of the rehabilitation of these projects should include measures to remediate past impacts (e.g., mandating adequate minimum compensation flow for the river during dry season). • No project shall be pursued that would degrade or adversely impact areas designated for protection/conservation or as cultural/historical heritage sites, or that would involve conversion of critical natural habitats. (See Annex A, Section F, for location of protected areas.) • For projects with significant indirect negative impacts that cannot be mitigated directly under the same project (e.g., generation of additional wastewater as a result of expanding the domestic water supply system), assessment must show that there are complementary projects in the program package to deal with the negative impact (e.g., provisions for sanitation improvement under a separate project located in the same area).
C. Procedure for Tranche-level Environmental Assessment
36. The Balai Besar PMU (through its Environmental Management Office), supported by a Program Management Consultant, shall be responsible for conducting an environmental assessment of the Tranche package. (In the case of the MFF Tranche 1, the environmental assessment has been carried out as part of the PPTA Phase 3. Future tranche assessments would be done within the purview of the PMU.)
37. The tranche-level environmental impact assessment would serve as a programmatic impact assessment of the various projects taken together in the tranche, and assess impacts with regard to inter-active effects among projects or their cumulative characteristics. Since the tranche package is a set of projects, the approach to and format of the tranche-level environmental assessment shall follow ADB’s guidelines for sector type activities. The tranche-based environmental assessment would be conducted within an IEE framework that allows flexibility to more closely examine
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 13 ICWRMP EARF aspects/impacts of specific projects within the tranche package as warranted by the nature of the project. This means that although an overall IEE approach is taken, a detailed assessment for the environmentally critical component projects will be made (e.g., the West Tarum Canal rehabilitation component under Tranche 1 due to the impact of dredging). If the IEE findings warrant a more thorough assessment for the tranche package because of interactive or cumulative adverse impacts involving a variety of projects, then an EIA would be conducted for the tranche.
38. The procedure for the tranche-level environmental assessment (which also incorporates project-level assessments) is as follows. Note that this impact assessment is to be carried out alongside the planning activities for the tranche so that mitigation and enhancement measures can be incorporated into the design of the projects included in the tranche.
• Review and update the environmental setting description and baseline assessment for the basin (refer to the SEA). • Screen the projects included in the proposed tranche for compliance/consistency with the environmental criteria described earlier. • Assess each project taking into consideration interactive and cumulative environmental impacts, as well as stakeholder concerns (derived from consultations). • Categorize the projects in the tranche package according to nature and potential significance of environmental impacts based on ADB and GOI regulations and procedures. • Formulate a general environmental management and monitoring plan for the tranche projects/activities based on the any findings of potentially significant adverse impacts. • Incorporate important mitigation and enhancement measures into the design of the projects. • Prepare justifications for exempt projects so that these can qualify for exemption from ADB environmental policy and GOI AMDAL requirements. • Identify critical aspects/impacts of projects and mitigation measures based on a template tranche-level environmental management and monitoring plan (EMMP; see appendix D) and for tranche level projects using the template EMMP of tranche 1, so that these can be incorporated into the follow-on AMDAL terms of reference and detailed assessment (see AMDAL procedures below) which would meet both GOI and ADB requirements..
39. Excerpts from the environmental assessment carried out for Tranche 1 component projects are provided in Annex E, which also illustrates the use of the EMMP template.
IV. GOI and ADB Environmental Requirements at the Project Level
A. Correspondence of AMDAL and ADB Environment Categorization of Projects
40. Under Indonesia’s environment regulations, all projects must comply with the review and clearance procedures specified under Indonesia’s AMDAL (EIA) system, as defined under GOI Regulation No. 27, 1999, and Decree of the Environment Ministry No. 17, 2001.
41. The AMDAL system generally conforms in intent to ADB’s environmental management guidelines and requires all projects to undergo AMDAL clearance before proceeding to implementation. Table 7 shows the correspondence between the ADB environmental categorization and projects and that under AMDAL. Essentially, an ANDAL study corresponds to an EIA, and an UKL/UPL study corresponds to an IEE. However, although content wise, the ANDAL and EIA are somewhat equivalent, categorization of a project requiring ANDAL under the Government of Indonesia’s AMDAL procedure may not be same as that of ADB categorization criteria. For example, Government of Indonesia’s AMDAL procedure classifies projects based on specific selection criteria, whereas ADB’s environmental guidelines determines category A projects based on “significance of impact” criteria based on a initial environment examination study.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 14 ICWRMP EARF
Table 7. Correspondence of ADB and AMDAL Project Categories ADB Project Categories AMDAL Project Categories Category A: Projects with potential for ANDAL: Projects requiring Environmental significant adverse environmental Impact Analysis* impacts, requiring an environmental impact assessment (EIA) Category B: Projects judged to have UKL/UPL: Projects requiring Environmental some adverse environmental impacts, Management Efforts/Plan (UKL) and but of lesser degree and/or significance Environmental Monitoring Efforts/Plan (UPL) than those for category A projects, and
requiring an initial environmental examination (IEE) Category C: Projects unlikely to have Exempt: Projects that do not require ANDAL adverse environmental impacts. or UKL/UPL. *Refer to Annex D for AMDAL-issued guidelines on preparing ANDAL and UKL/UPL reports.
42. It is recommended that the EARF at the project level be based on AMDAL as the latter is already well-established with legally-mandated steps for screening and review of projects, issuance of project clearance for implementation, requirements for public consultation and information disclosure, and follow-on monitoring of projects.
ADB Requirement
1. In accordance with ADB Environment Policy (2002), ADB environmental assessment classifies projects into A, B, C category status. The specifications for these categories are as follows:
Category Specifications A Potential for significant adverse environmental impact B Projects judged to have some adverse environmental impacts, but of lesser degree and/or significance than those for category A projects. An initial environmental examination (IEE) is required to determine whether or not significant environmental impacts warranting an EIA are likely. If an EIA is not needed, the IEE is regarded as the final environmental assessment report. C Projects unlikely to have adverse environmental impacts. No EIA or IEE is required, although environmental implications are still reviewed.
Procedures
2. A Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) to support classification of all types of projects. The categorization is based upon the Most Sensitive Component, meaning that if one part of the project poses a potential for significant adverse environmental impact, the project is classified as Category A regardless of the project’s other impacts.
3. For category A an EIA is required prior to Appraisal. For category B an IEE may be sufficient. Both documents should be prepared by the borrower. The differences between the two documents are indicated in the following paragraphs. Usually an IEE is prepared initially, as part of the feasibility study, and based on the findings of that document, it is decided whether a more detailed EIA is required.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 15 ICWRMP EARF
4. A typical IEE Report should be carried out along with the feasibility study. It should come to the conclusion as to whether or not significant environmental impacts warranting an EIA are likely. Sometimes an IEE can result in a recommendation for a full EIA; if so, it should also provide a draft scope and TOR for the EIA. An IEE follows the same general steps as for a full EIA except for a number of differences: (i) more limited scope and content; (ii) less public consultation is required; and no specific requirement for an EMP, and no adherence to the 120-day rule
B. Government of Indonesia AMDAL Procedures
43. The Balai Besar as the project implementing unit of the program (and acting as proponent) will be responsible for undertaking or commissioning the environmental assessment for AMDAL compliance and clearance. The project management consultant will assist the Balai Besar’s environment management unit/office in identifying specific AMDAL requirements for each project, such as the type of assessment required (ANDAL or UKL/UPL) and the public consultation and review steps required under AMDAL procedures. It will advise on key issues to examine, use of available baseline information and decision tools to expedite assessments, and safeguards that should be incorporated into the project.
44. MOE Decree No. 17 cited above requires screening of projects and specifies the types and sizes of activities requiring EIA (ANDAL projects). For example, dredging of rivers involving removal of more that 500,000 m3 of sediments, or flood channel development longer than 5 km require preparation of EIA. Even in cases where the scale of the proposed activities are smaller than the size categories requiring an EIA, and where the activities are deemed to have significant impacts considering the conditions of the local environment-- the district head or mayor may still require an EIA. Table 8 lists types of activities related to the program components that would be required to prepare EIA under AMDAL.
Table 8. Relevant Project Types Required to Comply with EIA-ANDAL Project Type Criteria* Construction of dams or other types of water Dam height greater than 15 m, or if extent of area impoundment inundated greater than 200 ha Development of new irrigated areas Area greater than 2,000 ha Improvement with expansion of existing irrigated Area greater than 1,000 ha areas River normalization and flood channel construction Depending on size of city: for metropolitan city, if channel length affected greater than 5 km; for medium-sized city, if greater than 10 km; and for rural areas, if greater than 15 km. For dredging activities, EIA is required if volume is greater than 500,000 m3 Solid waste management For all types of open dumping; for sanitary landfill, if area is greater than 10 ha or capacity greater than 10,000 tons Construction of fecal sludge processing plant Plant size greater than 2 ha Construction of wastewater treatment plant for Plant size greater than 3 ha, and/or if the size of the domestic wastes wastewater collection network is greater than 500 ha Development of urban sewerage system Sewerage length is greater than 5 km for metropolitan areas, or if greater than 10 km for medium-sized cities Development of piped water supply distribution Length of water distribution network is greater than 10 system km, or if service area covered is more than 500 ha Abstraction/diversion of water from reservoir, river, Rate of abstraction greater than 250 liters/sec spring or other surface water sources Pumping of groundwater Pumping rate greater than 50 liters/sec Cultivation of food crops and seasonal horticultural Project area greater than 2,000 ha
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 16 ICWRMP EARF
crops in watershed areas, with or without a processing unit Floating fishery cultivation in reservoirs Project area greater than 2.5 ha, or if the number of units exceeds 500 Forest products utilization (THBP/Tebang Habis Project area greater than 5,000 ha Permudaan Buatan) Source: Decree of the Environment Ministry No. 17, 2001 * Thresholds should, more specifically, be read as “greater than or equal to.”
45. Specific guidelines in preparing EIA documents under AMDAL are based on MOE Regulation No. 8, 2006. These consist of Guidelines for Preparing Terms of Reference for Environmental Impact Assessment, Guidelines for Preparing Environmental Impact Assessment (ANDAL), and Guidelines for Preparing Environmental Management Plan as well as Guidelines for Preparing Environmental Monitoring Plan (UKL/UPL). These guidelines are summarized in Annex F. AMDAL steps are summarized below and are also presented in diagram form in Figure 4. • In consultation with the relevant agency, the proponent determines if the AMDAL oversight body/agency for the project will be either: (i) the district level environmental protection agency in the case of projects located entirely within the district boundary; (ii) the BPLHD for projects that span several districts within the province, or (iii) the MOE for projects that have national significance or cross provincial boundaries. • Based on the AMDAL project screening criteria shown above, a project categorized by the responsible agency into one of three types: (i) project requiring an Environmental Impact Analysis (ANDAL); (ii) project requiring Environmental Management Efforts/Plan (UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Efforts/Plan (UPL); and (iii) projects that do not require AMDAL or UKL/UPL. • If ANDAL is required, the project proponent is instructed to prepare a Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Environmental Impact Assessment (i.e. KA-ANDAL). The ToR serves to formalize the scope of the assessment, i.e., identifying the main issues to be addressed. Before preparing the ToR, the proponent is required to make a public announcement of the proposed project through publication in a local newspaper. Within a month of such publication, stakeholders may submit their comments and suggestions for the ToR. A public consultation is held prior to finalizing the TOR. During this consultation meeting, the project proponent is expected to present a full description of the project and the potential impacts it may trigger. • An AMDAL committee for the project is organized to evaluate the TOR. Ideally, the same committee is tasked to evaluate the subsequent ANDAL document. This committee is formed by the district environment agency (in the case of district projects), BPLHD (in the case of provincial projects) or MOE (in the case of projects spanning provincial boundaries) to review the TOR and recommend approval. • Based on the approved TOR, the proponent prepares the ANDAL document and submits it for evaluation by the AMDAL commission assigned to the project. • During the review of the ANDAL document, another public consultation is held to disclose the assessment findings and to obtain feedback from stakeholders. Comments received from the AMDAL commission and public/stakeholders are considered in revising/finalizing the ANDAL. • The AMDAL committee again reviews the final ANDAL document and makes a recommendation to District/BPLHD/MOE for issuance or non-issuance of an AMDAL clearance. Further changes to the ANDAL document may be required by the committee prior to recommending approval.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 17 ICWRMP EARF
• During project implementation, the proponent is required to submit monitoring reports to District/BPLHD/MOE to keep track of impacts and implementation of mitigation measures. C. Staffing and Budget Requirements 46. For projects requiring ANDAL, AMDAL procedures require that the composition of the study team be determined on the basis of the ANDAL terms of reference and be subject to approval by the AMDAL oversight agency (e.g., the MOE in the case of the West Tarum Canal rehabilitation project). An ANDAL team typically comprises at least 5 members: an AMDAL- licensed team leader, subject matter specialist (e.g., hydrologist for water infrastructure projects), ecologist, environment specialist, and sociologist (or settlements specialist). Each is allotted six person-months of effort. The estimated budget for an ANDAL study is itemized below (UKL and UPL studies are estimated to cost Rp 300 to 500 million per project): Public notification (national and local newspapers) Rp 80,000,000 Public consultation ( “socialization”) Rp 120,000,000 Professional fees of ANDAL team Rp 750,000,000 Meetings/activities of the AMDAL review commission Rp 100,000,000 TOTAL: Rp 1,050,000,000 per project
D. Toward a Programmatic AMDAL for ICWRMP 47. It is not expected that AMDAL can be applied to the ICWRMP on a program level at this time (the term “programmatic” is used here to mean clustering of projects for AMDAL clearance). It is unlikely that BPLHD/MOE will agree to issue programmatic AMDAL clearance for clusters of projects as many of the roadmap projects have not been fully developed to be able to accurately predict and evaluate their impacts. Initial projects in the implementation pipeline (e.g., WTC rehabilitation) will have to be dealt with on a project-to-project basis.
48. However, in the course of implementing tranche 1 -- during which environmental data systems and action plans are to be developed, and at which time details of the pipeline projects would be more fully fleshed out -- arrangements could be made with BPLHD/MOE toward a more programmatic and tiered approach to AMDAL. This approach would allow multiple (related) projects (e.g., within one water quality management area for those whose significant aspects are related to pollution) to be assessed as a package so that inter-active and cumulative impacts are more readily taken into account.
49. Development of a programmatic AMDAL approach suitable for IWRM-type of activities should be seen as part of the capacity development thrust of the roadmap. The program management consultant working under the PMU should examine the feasibility (in consultation with BPLHD/MOE) of a programmatic IWRM approach to AMDAL. This would be done alongside the development of basinwide decision support tools (e.g. databases and water quality modeling) and the formulation of action plans (for watershed protection, river quality management, and pollution hotspots management). If, for example, WQ decision support tools prove viable for determining/allocating pollution load carrying capacity in the river, then programmatic assessments of projects inside a river catchment are possible to undertake—one that allows cumulative impacts of individual projects to be examined more fully.
50. The program management consultant should develop appropriate methodologies for programmatic EIA taking advantage of decision support tools developed under the roadmap, and then assist the PMU in institutionalizing said approach if found viable (and acceptable to BPLHD/MOE) beginning in Tranche 2.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 18 ICWRMP EARF
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 19 ICWRMP EARF
Figure 4. Process Flow of AMDAL
Local Residents and NGOs Competent Authority Project Proponents
Public Notice of the Project
Notice of EIA Procedure
Questions, Opinions and/or Requests
Preparation of Discussions KA- ANDAL
Appraisal of KA-ANDAL Questions, Opinions by AMDAL Commisiion and/or Requests (within 75 days)
Preparation of ANDAL, RKP and RPL
Appraisal of ANDAL, RKL, Questions, Opinions RPL by AMDAL Commission and/or Requests (within 75 days)
Decision Making of Project Implementation based of the Validity of the Proposed Project
Implementation of the project Submission and approval with monitoring and checking the management plan.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 20 ICWRMP EARF
ANNEXES
Annex A. Program Setting and Environment Issues
A. Physical Setting
1. The program area, located on Java Island and covering a total of about 13,000 km2, is a cluster of river basins consisting of: (i) the 6,600 km2 Citarum river basin which straddles the central part of the program area and flows from south to north into the Java Sea; (ii) the 4,400 km2 cluster of small basins whose drainage areas are connected to the Citarum river system through the East Tarum Canal (i.e., Ciherang, Cilamaya, Ciasem, Cipunegara and Cipancuh rivers); and (iii) the Cikarang and Bekasi rivers, with a combined drainage area of 2,000 km2 which are also connected with the Citarum river through the West Tarum Canal. Together, these inter-connected river basins make up the SWS Citarum.
2. The impact zone of the program extends beyond the boundaries of the cluster of basins that comprise the SWS Citarum. For instance, eastern Jakarta whose water supply comes from the Citarum system through the West Tarum Canal is a key impact area of the program. Also, the forest patches that lie along the watershed divide, particularly to the south, are included in the program’s impact zone. Figure A-1 shows the program area and impact zone.
Figure A-1. Program Area
3. The 270-km Citarum River originates from Gunung Wayang (Elevation 2,198 m amsl) south of Bandung. In its first 25 km, the river follows a steep slope (1:30). It then flows onto the middle part of the basin starting at Bandung for another 150 km; here the average riverbed slope is around 1:300. Then the river meanders across an alluvial plain for about 70 km before reaching the Java Sea. The average annual precipitation in the region is 2,400 mm. Upstream catchment areas of Ciherang and Cilamaya rivers, and the Cipunegara watershed, receive the heaviest rainfall exceeding 4,000 mm per year. The coastal alluvial plain receives the lowest rainfall.
4. The program area covers 9 districts and 2 cities. Of the 9 districts, 5 lie wholly within the program area. Figure A-2 shows the district boundaries. The population in 2003 was 17.8 million, with 4.1 million households: 30% derived livelihood from agriculture, 25% from industry, and
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 21 ICWRMP EARF
45% from services. The population in the program area is projected to rise to 21.3 million by 2010. The dynamism of the region’s economy is shown by 2003 data indicating West Java province’s GRDP growth rate (4.97%) outperforming that of Jakarta (4.39%). Nonetheless, poverty is still pervasive in the basin, as shown in Figure A-2 on percentage of population living below the poverty line.
Figure A-2. Administrative Boundaries and Poverty Incidence
District Boundaries Percent of Population Below Poverty Line
B. Socio-Economic Setting
5. The Bekasi and Bandung regions are the most heavily populated and urbanized. Bekasi essentially acts as a satellite city of Jakarta, absorbing most of the industrial and population expansion to the east. The catchment of the Bekasi River is rapidly transforming into numerous housing subdivisions and industrial estates—with development pressure coming from both north (Jakarta) and south (Bogor). Paddy fields to the north of Bekasi are also being converted to residential and industrial uses.
6. The Bekasi area in particular has been experiencing rapid population growth and urbanization. A 2000 census shows that 22% of Bekasi City residents and 18.5% of Bekasi District residents are migrants who moved into the area only within the last five years of the census.
7. Industrial locations are generally interwoven with settlements and there is no clear zoning or separation of these land uses in the basin. Although settlements and industry make up only 8.2% of the program area, their impact on land use change in the region is significant. The mixed industry-settlement land uses are clustered along a rapidly urbanizing corridor defined by the recently completed expressway linking Jakarta and Bandung, which passes through Bekasi, Karawang and Purwakarta. The arrowheads in the urban corridor depicted in Figure A-3 show the direction of urban sprawl stimulated by the new highway corridor. In the coming years, urbanization will take place both in the form of continued expansion toward the upper catchments (in Bekasi and Bandung) and via a more recent but accelerating expansion toward the coast in Karawang.
8. Bekasi City and Bekasi District, for example, are projected to grow in terms of population by 20% in 2010, compared with Year 2005 figures (around 2 million each). Karawang’s population, too, is projected to grow from 1.97 million in 2005 to 2.15 million in 2010 (9% growth). Between 2000 and 2005, Karawang’s population grew by 11%. In the Upper Citarum region settlement areas increased from 25,000 ha in 1992 to 46,000 ha in 2001. This corresponded
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 22 ICWRMP EARF with a 40% decline in paddy field areas, from 125,000 ha in 1992 to 75,000 ha in 2001. As in Bekasi, the upper basin is experiencing a rapid conversion of paddy fields into settlements.
Figure A-3. Urban Land Use
Settlements Industrial Establishments
9. The pattern of urbanization in the region has a significant impact on the water supply system, not only because of the projected increased demand, but also because much of the domestic and industrial water supply to Bekasi and Jakarta passes through the same corridor (i.e., West Tarum Canal). Settlements and commercial establishments are gradually encroaching on the canal easements, threatening both water quality and water supply security.
10. The area is a key rice producer for the country (Figure A-4). There are a total of 390,000 ha of irrigated paddies, with 240,000 ha served by the Juanda reservoir and canal system in the lower basin. Land devoted to rice production make up nearly half (47.5%) of the program area, with 70% of these fully irrigated. Rainfed areas cover 43,000 ha, or only about 10% of the land use.
Figure A-4. Agriculture and Forest Map
Rice Producing Areas Forest Areas
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 23 ICWRMP EARF
11. In the Upper Citarum watershed around Bandung District, hillyland farming is pervasive and many of the farmers still prefer to plant vegetables and annual crops that do not provide adequate cover and protection from soil erosion. The population density in Bandung District is 32 persons per ha, growing at 3.45% annually. By Year 2010, the population in the district is projected to reach 7.4 million. Forty percent of the population is presently engaged in agriculture. In the Upper Citarum as a whole, upland farming areas increased from 6,000 ha in 1992 to 37,000 ha in 2001.
12. In the Upper Citarum, the expansion of urban settlements is taking place largely through conversion of the surrounding paddy fields. On the other hand, the expansion of the upland farming areas (which increased by 31,000 ha from 1992 to 2001) is taking place at the expense of the forest. Thus, forested areas in the Upper Citarum have declined from 35,000 ha in 1992 to 19,000 ha in 2001 (45% reduction).
13. Remaining forests cover only about 10.2% of the program area—100,600 ha of primary forest, and 34,800 of secondary forest—far less than the 30% mandated in the 1999 national forestry law. While nearly all of the remaining primary forests are designated for protection and conservation, secondary forests are still considered as production forests where harvesting of forest products and timber is allowed. Much of the remaining primary forest is in fragmented condition. Fragmentation reduces ecosystem viability and makes these areas vulnerable to continuing encroachment and conversion for upland farming. Establishing vegetated corridors to link these fragmented forests is important for ensuring their ability to support biodiversity.
A. Water Availability/Scarcity
14. Average annual demand from the Jatiluhur reservoir has increased from 140 m3/sec in 1996 to156 m3/sec in 2004. In 1996, the Jatiluhur system supplied adequate water releases for irrigation and domestic/industrial supply (through the West, North and East Tarum Canals). However, in 2001, the system failed to meet water needs for 1.5 months during the dry season, and in 2005, it failed to meet water needs for 5 months.
15. Inflow into the Saguling reservoir has been decreasing. Between 1986 and 1991, dry season flow into the Saguling reservoir was 38% of the average annual flow. This percentage went down to 36% between 1992 and 1997, and declined further to 34% starting in 1998. Watershed degradation is seen as the principal cause. Denuded catchments have reduced capacity to capture rainwater, resulting in high peak flows during the rainy months. In turn, the lower water retention capacity reduces the amount of water available for release as “base flow” during the summer months.
16. It is not certain to what extent water scarcity at the source (catchment areas and reservoir storage) is the real problem. One view is that, even if reservoir storage volumes and releases are adequate, the poor condition of the water distribution system results in a lot of water being lost or wasted, thereby failing to meet water needs at the users’ end. This is particularly true for the lower basin area. The PPTA report indicates that hydraulic control structures in the lower basin are defective or are malfunctioning due to lack of maintenance. Nonetheless, continued watershed degradation combined with increasing water demands for agriculture, industry and drinking water are bound to create water scarcity problems in the coming years.
17. In the Bandung area, however, the effects of water scarcity are already widely felt. Most of the water supply for households and industry there currently come from groundwater, which is already overused. Indeed, much of the criticism directed at the earlier PPTA recommendations had to do with the perceived lack of attention to the water supply concerns of Bandung. Groundwater extraction is excessive and unsustainable. There are few river catchments upstream that are suitable for reservoir development. It is thought that the long term solution lies in tapping the
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 24 ICWRMP EARF existing Saguling reservoir, if pollution problems can be addressed. Tapping the Saguling will require a watershed-wide intervention to arrest pollution, undesirable hydrologic regimes and excessive sediment loading.
B. Groundwater Exploitation
18. Surface water provides only for part of the basin’s water needs. A considerable portion of the region’s water demand, in particular that of Jakarta and Bandung, is supplied by groundwater. The rate of groundwater extraction is believed to be considerably under-estimated, since a large portion of the extraction activities are not registered. Actual abstraction is believed to be at least 3 times the quantity reflected in official records.
19. As early as 1997, a JICA study had estimated groundwater abstraction in DKI Jakarta to be around 8 m3/sec. This is about half of the surface water supplied to the metropolitan area by the West Tarum Canal. As reported in the JICA study, domestic use accounted for almost 90% of total groundwater abstraction in Jakarta. As a result, groundwater is thought to have exceeded sustainable levels. In both Jakarta and Bandung, over-exploitation of groundwater is reported to have caused land subsidence. In turn, this has caused structural damage to some buildings and, more significantly, exacerbated local drainage and flooding problems.
20. In Bandung, an estimated 90% of the population, and 98% of the industries, rely on groundwater. Modeling studies done in 2002 suggest that recorded groundwater extraction is only about one-third of the actual amount. The lowering of the groundwater level is reportedly up to 5 meters per year in some places. The cumulative water level decline since 1920 has been 85 m. In 2005, it was estimated that land subsidence had reached 0.8 m. In order to get clean water, industrial wells have to be drilled to beyond 150 m.
21. Industrial groundwater abstraction in Bandung has also had a devastating effect on shallow wells on which numerous households depend. Most industrial and domestic effluent are not treated, and the infiltration of polluted water has caused a deterioration in the water quality of shallow wells, indicated by black an yellowish water color.
22. Correcting the groundwater mining problem, particular in Bandung, will necessitate finding alternative water supply sources for the large number of industries and households that currently depend on groundwater. Especially as pollution effects render shallow wells unsafe, replacement sources for water supply are expected to intensify. It is thought that improved management of the surface water resource will provide long term remedy. For groundwater levels to also recover, rehabilitation of the watershed recharge areas is necessary including measures using artificial recharge (e.g., recharge well systems).
C. Erosion and Sedimentation
23. Watershed erosion is a serious problem in the upper river basin where hillsides are steep and the catchment denuded. Even on steep slopes, farmers cultivate non-perennial crops which do not provide adequate ground cover from the heavy monsoon rains. The soils, derived from volcanic tuff, are easily erodible and are prone to land slides. High peak flows have also increased the rate of river bank erosion.
24. Hydrologic flow regimes have been adversely changed by land degradation, notably the loss of adequate forest cover and the prevalence of hillside farming in the upper catchments. The degraded catchments have reduced capacity to capture rainwater, resulting in high peak flows during the rainy months which carry large amounts of eroded soil. At the entrance to Saguling Reservoir, the ratio of wet season high flows to dry season low flows has increased from 3.4 recorded in 1992 to 7.4 in 2003. As a result, landslides and mud flows are frequent during the rainy
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 25 ICWRMP EARF
season. Figure A-5 shows the extent of degraded areas in the basin (around 25% of the basin area). These areas have erosion rates in excess of 60 tons per ha per year.
25. Wet season floods carry large amounts of sediment into the three reservoirs, especially at Saguling. Here, the average annual sediment inflow was estimated at 8 million cubic meters (based on bathymetric surveys of the reservoir conducted by Indonesia Power, a state-owned company, in 2004). Relative to the Saguling reservoir’s catchment area, the sediment load is equivalent to an erosion rate of 3 mm per year, nearly times the original design rate. A similar alarming rate of watershed erosion is reported for the Cirata reservoir.
Figure A-5. Degraded and Flood-prone Areas
Degraded/Eroded Areas Areas Prone to Flooding and Mud Flows
26. The three cascading reservoirs (Saguling, Cirata and Jatiluhur) were built to regulate flows, provide hydropower, and store/supply water for irrigation, industrial and domestic use. They also trap sediments. The rate at which sediments are being deposited in the reservoirs is rapidly reducing storage capacity and shortening their useful life.
27. In the lower Citarum basin, regulated discharges coming from the Jatiluhur reservoir combine with the flow from the Cikao River. The latter transports considerable quantities of sediment into the Curug diversion weir. Although much of the sediment is prevented from entering the canals (WTC, NTC and ETC), the large quantities of sediment are transported downstream by the Citarum River. The Cibeet River, which joins the Citarum River, adds a significant volume to the latter’s sediment load. This load is then deposited in the delta where it silts up the river outlet and exacerbates flooding.
28. Within the WTC, sediment is brought into the canal at the confluence with the Cibeet, Cikarang and Bekasi Rivers. Occuring mainly during the rainy season, the sediment load has silted up the canal bed and caused reduction in canal conveyance capacity. Whereas the source of sediment load in the upper basin is watershed denudation due to upland farming, the sediment load from the Cibeet and Bekasi Rivers come from land conversion to support urban development activities taking place in the catchment.
D. Flooding and Water-Related Disasters
29. Flooding is a consequence mainly of changes in the river flow regime, in turn caused by changes in watershed conditions. Areas affected by flooding and related landslides and mudflows are shown in Figure A-5. As water retention capacity of the river catchments is reduced by denudation and land conversion for urban development, flood peaks have increased. As mentioned above, the ratio of wet season peak flows to dry season low flows in the upper basin has increased
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 26 ICWRMP EARF from 3.4 in 1992 to 7.3 in 2003. The increased flood frequency and severity are also invariably associated with destructive landslides and mud flows. In the upper basin (Bandung area), recent severe flooding and mud flows occurred in February 2005 affected an area covering 2,000 ha. The flooding submerged parts of the area for 7 days and up to 2 meters deep; 50,000 inhabitants had to be evacuated.
30. Flooding around Bandung has become more frequent and severe. Here, however, there is no single cause. The problem is due to a combination of: (i) watershed denudation, (ii) effects of past re-alignment/straightening of the Citarum river (through cutoffs) which, while alleviating flooding upstream, increase peak flows downstream, (iii) localized land subsidence due to groundwater over-pumping that impair drainage, and (iv) clogging of drainage canals and streams by garbage. Flood-prone areas around Bandung are located in the south area of the city along the Citarum River (Dayeuh Kolot).
31. Currently, measures to reduce or mitigate flooding problems in the upper basin are being undertaken through the Upper Citarum Flood Control Project. Remediation measures include re- greening/reforestation and introduction of structural erosion control measures in the watershed, as well as improvement of the urban drainage system around Bandung.
32. At the lower basin (near Jakarta) where the Cikeas and Cileungsi Rivers join to become the Bekasi River, converging floodwater from the two tributaries have caused perennial flooding in Bekasi City. Already naturally prone to flooding due to the area’s location downstream of the confluence of two rivers, the flooding problem is expected to worsen as more of Bekasi’s upper catchment is subjected to land conversion for urban and industrial development.
33. Along the lower Citarum River levees/embankments built during the Dutch period help confine flooding within the river’s meander zone and provide protection to the surrounding settlements. However, areas of the floodway within the levees have been planted with crops and fruit trees that have the effect of retarding flow, contributing to high water levels. Also, a long term effect of the river embankments has been to raise the riverbed due to sediment accumulation, as levees prevent the spilling of sediments onto the surrounding plain. Consequently, floodwater levels inside the levees are frequently higher than the level of the surrounding land, putting surrounding settlements at risk in case of levee failure.
34. At the Citarum river mouth, the build-up of deposited sediments has created sand dunes that impede floodwater discharge. Combined with the effect of high tides, the constricted river outlet causes perennial inundation of the lower basin near the delta as floodwater is forced to back up into the alluvial plain.
E. Water Pollution
35. The population within the program area is growing at more than 3% annually, attributed in part to influx of migrants attracted by the region’s rapid development. The combined effects of untreated domestic sewage, solid waste disposal and industrial effluents have significantly increased pollution loads in the Citarum river system. In the upper basin, river water polluted by domestic and industrial waste from Bandung flows into the Saguling reservoir. At the inlet to the reservoir, water quality monitoring in the late 1990s showed average annual BOD concentrations as high as 300 mg/l. Control measures reduced the BOD load to 200 mg/l by year 2000, and further reduced to 55 mg/l during subsequent years. However, as reported by Indonesia Power in 2004, BOD concentrations at the Saguling reservoir inlet still go up to as high as 130 mg/l during the dry season. In recent years, the BOD concentrations in the Cikapunding River (a major tributary of the Saguling River which flows through Bandung) were reported to reach as high as 100 mg/l.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 27 ICWRMP EARF
36. Runoff from hillside farms, in addition, bring in massive amounts of plant nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) that induce eutrophication in the reservoirs. At Saguling where the problem is most significant, nitrogen loading has been estimated at 33,350 tons per year, and for Phosphorus, 4,370 tons per year. Algal blooms and their subsequent decay have been blamed for the regular occurrence of fish kills and considerable damage to the floating fish cage industry (although some fish kills have been attributed to other causes, e.g., virus/bacteria). In turn, the uncontrolled expansion of fish cage operations has added to the effects of polluted water coming into the reservoir. Improper or excessive fish feeding in the floating cages increases the waste load as unconsumed feed accumulates on the reservoir bed. When these organic deposits are disturbed and resuspended (e.g., at the start of the rainy season when increased inflows induce mixing in the reservoir and during temperature-induced inversion) oxygen demand becomes excessive. This is thought to be a key factor in causing perennial fish kills.
37. Whereas pollution of the (upper basin) Saguling reservoir poses a serious threat to the viability of fishery activities and potential future use of the reservoir to supply water to Bandung, the pollution in the lower basin—particularly in the downstream portion of the West Tarum Canal—poses an equally urgent water quality problem. The WTC supplies 80% of Jakarta’s (surface) raw water supply, and hence is vital to the well-being of 8 million inhabitants. On its route to Jakarta, the WTC intersects the Bekasi River which drains an area rapidly being developed for residential and industrial use. At the Bekasi River’s confluence with the WTC, the average annual BOD concentration in 2004 was 48 mg/l (measured at the weir site). The pollution load in the Bekasi River is caused by untreated household sewage, industrial wastewater, and solid waste dumped along the river banks.
38. Lack of proper solid waste management contributes to both pollution and flooding. Garbage deposited along canals and riverbanks contribute to the high BOD. They also clog drains and accumulate on riverbeds reducing discharge capacity. According to the PD Kebersihan of Bandung City, average daily solid waste generation is 6,500 m3/day, of which an estimated 1,500 m3/day is not collected and properly disposed. Thus the annual uncollected garbage that invariably end up accumulating in the drainage system and rivers amounts to 500,000 m3. According to the Saguling Dam office, the estimate inflow of solid waste into the reservoir is 250,000 m3 per year.
39. Along the West Tarum Canal, reduction in conveyance capacity is due both to sediment deposits and the prolific growth of aquatic plants (which create friction in water flow). Apart from contributing to the bottom detritus, aquatic plants trap silt and accelerate canal shallowing. Plant growth is promoted by the use of the canal as toilet and bathing/washing area for residents, which adds substantial quantities of plant nutrients in the water.
40. Residential and commercial establishments along the canal are dense particularly downstream of the waterway from Cikarang and Bekasi to Jakarta. There is open access to the canal (only the Jakarta portion is fenced). Where the canal width has narrowed and more land has been exposed on the water side of the road embankment, food stalls, scavenging shops, and other small-scale commercial establishments have sprouted. Wastewater and garbage from these establishments are disposed of directly into the canal.
F. Ecological Resources
41. Ecosystem transformation is usually divided into these five phases: an initially pristine area is perforated by patches of disturbance (forest clearing, farming, settlement), then dissected by roads as areas become more urbanized, then fragmentation into patches of remaining natural ecosystems, followed by shrinkage of these remaining patches and their gradual disappearance by attrition. West Java and the Citarum basin may be characterized as having reached the fragmentation stage and, in the more vulnerable areas, shrinkage of its remaining natural ecosystem patches—notably forests--is a continuing trend. Radical land use changes over the last 150 years have left only scattered remnants of natural forest ecosystems. All low-lying protected
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 28 ICWRMP EARF areas are currently being further degraded by human activities. Forested areas and areas with endangered flora and fauna, including important bird areas, are shown in Figure A-6.
Figure A-6. Remaining Forest and Areas of Endangered Biodiversity
42. Two national parks are located in the upper catchment of the Citarum River: Gunung Gede Pangrango (15,000 ha), and Gunung Halimum (40,000 ha). Both are classified as Category II – managed for ecosystem protection and recreation -- under IUCN’s protected area management classification system. Gunung Halimum has one of the most extensive area of evergreen torpical rainforest remaining in the island of Java. Gunung Gede Pangrango national park is primarily covered with sub-montane and montane forests that exemplify the primary rainforests of Indonesia. It forms the core of the Cibodas biosphere reserve. Gunung Gede is the source of numerous streams and rivers that drain into Jakarta Bay and Java Sea, including the Citarum River. The rivers flowing from the park provide water worth an estimated $1.5 billion annually for domestic and agricultural uses.
43. The WWF has underscored the international biodiversity importance of Java’s remaining sub-alpine and montane forests as these are among the most ecologically intact areas of forest remaining in Java. Further, these areas contain both a number of endemic species and many lowland species found in lower montane zones. For this reason, all the mountainous protected areas in the Citarum river basin are of a high priority for conservation actions. As such, all extensive remaining patches of natural vegetation in the Citarum basin, even if secondary growth, are of the highest conservation significance.
44. Streams in the upper catchment areas in the Citarum River Basin, particularly in the area of Gunung Wayang, are relatively unpolluted and retain a moderately diverse macro benthic fauna. However, pollution in these areas is also occurring as a consequence of cattle excrement and soil erosion. The mid stream areas are heavily polluted by factory effluent which dramatically lowers macro benthic faunal diversity, which also effects water quality further down stream.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 29 ICWRMP EARF
Figure A-7. Locations of Protected Areas (National Parks)
45. A wealth of biodiversity also exists in village gardens that are found extensively throughout the basin. These places retain important relict populations of a lowland biota that has all but disappeared from many areas in Java. Soemarwoto and Conway (1992) studied village gardens in the Citarum river basin at various altitudes from sea level to 3,000 m, including near the Saguling and Cirata dams. They reported the biological richness of village gardens. Village gardens are also a good habitat for small wild animals such as birds, reptiles, and amphibians.
G. Policies and Institutions
46. Without intending to oversimplify the complexity of the problems related to policies and institutions for managing the basin, the main problems may be summarized as follows. Although PJT II is mandated to manage the whole Citarum river basin, its actual scope of management is limited to “in-stream” river management and raw water supply (up to the secondary canal level). However, many of the basin’s management problems are “off-stream” in nature (e.g., watershed degradation, urban and industrial pollution). The latter are the purview mainly of the local governments (district level) or central government entities (e.g., the Forest Department) over which PJT II has no control (besides coordination)
47. Apart from its primarily in-stream management functions (i.e., maintenance of hydraulic facilities and dredging of canals), PJT II is only a recommendatory body on water allocation and water quality management matters. On the other hand, the existing basin management council (PPTPA, which in turn is a recommendatory body to the Provincial Governors of West Java and Jakarta) is dominated by the public sector (national and local government entities) and do not represent the true variety of sectors with important stakes in basin management (industries, communities, NGOs). This is expected to be corrected with the implementation of Law 7/2004 which mandates creation of more representative national and basin-wide water resources
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 30 ICWRMP EARF management bodies. A more inclusive basin management council for Citarum is to be created on the basis of Law 7/2004.
48. PJT II’s management weaknesses ultimately boil down to inadequate resources with which to perform its in-stream management and water quality monitoring functions, let alone initiate or contribute to off-stream activities such as reforestation or pollution control. PJT II is authorized to charge water for hydropower generation (by PLN) and raw water supplies for drinking and industrial use (at the WTC, for example). However, water rates are believed to be well below the economic value (scarcity/opportunity cost) of the water provided, and, more fundamentally, not enough to even cover basic costs of infrastructure maintenance. Raw water fees reportedly recover only 40% of actual O&M expenditures. Water for irrigation, on the other hand, is not charged.
49. Proper water pricing as a (demand) management concept has been around in the Citarum basin since about ten years ago. For instance, the Jatiluhur WRMP study of 1998 provided specific recommendations on water supply pricing. However, the implementation obstacles appear to be driven—not so much by a lack of appreciation for the concept on the part of DPU and the Finance Ministry—but by a still widely-held public notion of water as a “God-given” free resource. Hence the understandable reluctance of the government to apply it. Public support for water pricing first needs to be raised, and this will require innovative approaches in public information and stakeholder involvement (e.g., in the river basin council).
50. Pricing of pollution (based on the “polluters-pay-principle, for example as applied to BOD loads) is also a familiar management concept. However, it has not been applied in the Citarum basin, and its introduction will require dialogue with the (influential) industry sectors that could be expected to challenge it. Arbitrarily setting the charge will be resisted. Some form of decision support system—essentially a water quality model to examine effects of effluent reductions on meeting agreed-on water quality targets—may be necessary to provide “scientific” basis for a pollution charge system that is acceptable to industry.
51. Water pricing, whether for raw water or use of the water as sink for pollutants, is bound to be debated not just on economic grounds but also with regard to equity and fairness considerations. Industrial polluters are bound to question why they should be required to pay for pollution even though an even larger share of the problem is coming from households (e.g., households are estimated to account for 60 % of the BOD load in Bandung). In the case of raw water, Jakarta users are likely to challenge why they have to pay increased raw water charges (currently set at Rp117 per cubic meter) even though farmers are getting irrigation water from the same source for free. This is where a more inclusive basin management council will need to play a vital conflict resolution role. For future stakeholder debates to be informed, an effective information system (linked to a decision-support system) is necessary.
52. While the PROKASIH-PROPER (Clean Rivers Program) showed big promise as an innovative cooperation-based approach to industrial pollution control during its introduction in the late 1980s, it apparently has not been sustained in the basin (and throughout the country following the change of government in 1998). In Bandung where there are at least 500 large factories (mostly textile) discharging large quantities of water pollutants, only 100 are participating in the program (according to BPLHD-West Java). Large industries facing pollution sanctions often slip through by arguing that sanctions (e.g., closure) would affect the livelihood of vast numbers of people. Regulatory enforcement needs to be combined with public education and support in order to be effective.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 31 ICWRMP EARF
Annex B. SEA Methodology and Link to EARF
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 32 ICWRMP EARF
Annex C. ICWRMP/Roadmap Environment Management Strategies
1. Three sets of environmental management activities are discussed below:
• Remediation or amelioration of adverse water-related environmental conditions that already exist in the basin and pose a risk to program sustainability (e.g., watershed degradation, excessive groundwater use, pollution); these measures have been incorporated into the roadmap. • Capacity development in environmental management as support to IWRM (e.g., integrated basin management system, strengthening of water quality regulatory system through improved monitoring and enforcement, as well as strategic policy interventions). • Mitigation measures to address some potential adverse impacts resulting mainly from the water utilization program key area (as discussed in the preceding section).
A. Remediation Measures for Existing Environmental Problems
1. Groundwater Management
2. The program priority for managing the over-used groundwater resources in the Bandung basin is development of surface water sources to replace groundwater—in particular to address industry over-dependence on groundwater and to prioritize groundwater use for domestic needs. Groundwater abstraction control is constrained by the current limited availability of surface water supplies from the PDAMs to substitute for groundwater. Only 1% of industrial water demand is supplied by the PDAMs. At present, industrial groundwater abstraction is intensive and concentrated in pockets (e.g., Cimanhi). Industry accounts for 80% of groundwater use in the Bandung basin; textile factories consume the most volume.
3. The general approach is combined or conjunctive management of groundwater and surface water supply, in particular the provision of alternative surface water source for industries currently mining the area’s deep groundwater on a large scale. The objective is to enable groundwater levels to recover. This will reduce the cost of pumping for domestic use (through the PDAMs). Domestic use should be the priority allocation for groundwater. Re-allocating groundwater away from industry is also economically advantageous in that surface water supplies need to be treated mainly to meet industrial requirements, which is significantly lower than standards for domestic use. In contrast, deep groundwater is less expensive to treat to meet drinking standards compared with surface water, and is therefore a preferred source for the PDAMs. Furthermore, by removing the competition for groundwater use coming from industry, numerous households that now depend on polluted shallow groundwater to augment the limited supply from the PDAM can be adequately provided with clean water.
4. Thus, the groundwater management strategy for Bandung basin would combine: (i) remedial measures to mitigate ongoing problems caused by excessive groundwater extraction; (ii) strategic measures to develop alternative surface water sources to supply industry need so that groundwater can be reserved for domestic use; and (iii) implementation of measures to induce industry users to actually shift to surface water supply.
5. The severity of the groundwater problem is well known in the Bandung basin and there are already measures being taken by the local governments to remedy the problem. Remedial measures have been promulgated under Provincial Regulation 16/ 2001 and licensing is now strictly controlled. A 10-year integrated groundwater resources plan for West Java has also been prepared by the (West Java) Provincial Mining and Energy Agency with technical advice from the Bandung Institute of Technology. Extensive groundwater modeling has been done to simulate/assess the extent of critical groundwater areas under different scenario conditions. As a
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 33 ICWRMP EARF result , the Bandung basin has been zoned into three, designated as critical, vulnerable or safe— with stringent measures to control pumping in the critical zones. Related remedial measures taken since 2003 have reduced abstraction by about 70 liters/sec. These include: (i) restriction on issuance of groundwater abstraction licenses; (ii) requiring industries renewing their licenses to reduce abstraction by 10%; (iii) closure of unregistered wells; (iv) introduction of water conservation measures, and (v) rehabilitation of groundwater recharge areas in the watershed, including artificial recharge methods.
6. However, the remedial measures above will not eliminate the problem unless industries are weaned away from dependence on groundwater. Alternative surface water sources need to be developed to specifically target industry users. The Bandung case is an example of where solution to a water resource conservation problem (groundwater) lies in development—that of developing alternative surface water sources. In the case of Bandung this solution is not as straightforward as it seems because the available surface water is expensive to treat due to high turbidity and pollution. A strategic solution requires a package: surface water development plus watershed protection, plus pollution control. On the other hand, as noted earlier, the cost of treating surface water for industrial use is considerably lower compared with similar treatment for domestic use.
7. There are four alternatives for developing surface water sources to augment water supply in Bandung—as presented in the previous section--specifically so as to provide for the needs of industry and relieve the pressure on the latter on the over-used groundwater: (i) Rehabilitation of watersheds to increase the DMI supply from rivers and springs; (ii) System Rice Intensification (SRI) to divert excess water from paddy irrigation to DMI water supply; (iii) Utilization of Saguling reservoir; (iv) Interbasin water transfer from the Cibatarua watershed.
8. The preferred scheme, taking into account technical, financial, environmental and social feasibility, will be examined during a Tranche 1 formulation of a water supply action plan for the Bandung area. Immediate emphasis should be on water demand management and conservation, particularly the potential for reducing irrigation requirements through innovative water-saving cropping systems such as SRI (System Rice Intensification), to make more surface water available for DMI from existing sources. Whichever strategic option is favored, it would be important to incorporate into the plan a watershed rehabilitation and protection component—for while the positive effects of augmenting water supply though watershed protection may take time to become noticeable, it is essential for long term sustainability. Also, any option to develop new water sources should be combined with measures to reduce losses in the water supply system—at the production, distribution and demand sides.
9. Finally, once an alternative surface water supply source has been developed, it will be necessary to implement measures to induce industry users to shift from groundwater to surface water supply by connecting to the PDAM. At present, despite the cost of pumping from the deep aquifer, it is still a less expensive option for industries as compared to connecting to the PDAM. For instance, the groundwater tax in Bandung ranges from Rp 1,750 to 3,138 per cubic meter, whereas the PDAM water tariff is considerably higher at between Rp 2,725 to 9,600. A combination of price inducements (by raising the tax on groundwater) and mandatory connection to the PDAM through regulation (particularly for those industries located in the designated critical zones) would be needed to force the desired shift.
2. Basin-wide Water Quality Management
10. Development of a basin-wide water quality action plan should follow the same principles of integrated water resource management -- emphasizing multi-stakeholder participation, appropriate delineation of planning boundaries, and adoption of holistic approaches to problem solving. The latter includes simultaneously addressing varied sources of pollution and developing management schemes that combine use of regulatory methods (command-and-control),
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 34 ICWRMP EARF cooperation (PROKASIH PROPER), and market-oriented instruments (raw water fees and pollution charges). These principles and strategies serve as framework for action planning.
11. The river quality improvement plan—guided by the framework above---will specifically address two major problem aspects. One pertains to water pollution caused by point sources (e.g., industries) that are already subject to regulation; the basinwide plan would identify ways to strengthen regulatory control over these point sources so that current reliance on voluntary and cooperation-based approaches is complemented by equally strong and direct regulatory control. On the other hand, success in regulating industrial point sources is not enough. Pollutants coming from diffuse sources, notably domestic wastewater and farm wastes, are also significant (at least as far as conventional pollutants like BOD are concerned). In Bandung District, for example, household BOD load accounts for 70% of the total load in the river. These sources lie outside the reach of traditional regulation. Addressing this problem requires coordinated measures involving district governments, infrastructure agencies (e.g., responsible for sewerage provision), water services providers (e.g. PDAMs), and communities The basin plan should enable coordination and complementary action.
12. Through this plan, the basin could be divided into several water quality management areas depending on the specific nature and cause of water quality management problems. Urban areas, such as Bandung and Bekasi, would be managed as areas with focus on industrial pollution as well as pollution coming from settlements—affecting not only surface waters but also the groundwater. Hotpots with serious pollution problems, e.g., Nanjung, would be targeted. The reservoirs could define management areas for dealing with pollution caused by aquaculture activities (e.g., caused by artificial fish feeding), and in the case of Saguling, because of pollution from upstream textile factories. Areas that are predominantly agricultural, or that lie in degraded watersheds, have their own water quality management concerns (e.g., chemical residues from farms, and sediments from degraded watersheds) and could be managed also as water quality management areas. The control strategies and water quality parameters to be monitored for each area would thus be dictated by the characteristics of the area and the dominant sources of pollution. In these areas, stakeholders can more effectively participate in drawing up and implementing solutions as the problems are much closer to their day-to-day concerns.
13. River monitoring should thus be based on land use and nature of water quality concerns/threats in the area. A plan for water quality monitoring in each water quality management area should be developed as part of the basinwide water quality action plan -- identifying the priority parameters, and with protocols to ensure that monitoring results are used to support regulatory enforcement and community awareness-building programs. Standardized procedures for water and sediment sampling, laboratory analysis, reporting and data banking should be developed.
14. The staff of the district environment protection agencies need to be equipped with basic water sampling, monitoring and testing kits that they can use to conduct rapid water quality analysis of rivers (e.g., in response to community complaint), as well as to do independent verification of water quality reports from pollution discharge sources. They can also assist in gathering data for calibrating water quality models.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 35 ICWRMP EARF
3. Area Pollution Sources Management
15. Particularly for the areas with high density of industries (notably Bandung and Bekasi), an area action plan should be drawn up to more effectively deal with pollution problems at the source. Such plans should be oriented around combination of strategies that involve expansion of cooperation schemes under PROKASIH PROPER, strengthening of regulatory (command-and- control) systems, and use of incentives. The latter would include a phasing in of pollution charge schemes accompanied by measures to provide industries with a wider set of options for managing pollution, for instance, by adopting preventive rather than end-of-pipe measures. Self-regulation schemes using environmental management system (EMS) standards could also be promoted and rewarded.
16. In areas with high industrial density, there is need for more targeted pollution reduction planning. Bandung, for instance, is the most heavily industrialized part of the basin and produces high amounts of pollutants, mostly from the textile industry which make up 85% of industrial establishments in the district. Process wastewater from these factories are typically high in oxygen- depleting substances (BOD and COD), even though this contribution is small in comparison with that coming from household sewage. However, Phenol and Chromium are more toxic pollutants generated almost entirely from the textile industry in Bandung. Managing pollution from these industries needs to address toxic pollutant discharges, not just BOD/COD that are being addressed under the PROKASIH/SUPERKASIH program.
17. Aspects of an action plan to manage pollution from textile factories in Bandung could include: (i) setting up centralized waste treatment facilities for more effective and economical treatment of wastewater from textile factories, (ii) incentives and support to encourage textile firms to adopt waste minimization and pollution prevention methods, and to set up environmental management systems. Pollution prevention in the case of toxic pollutants is more important than end-of-pipe treatment. The lack of adequate industrial sludge disposal facilities means that toxic pollutants removed during wastewater treatment might simply be shifted from water to land due to improper sludge disposal. Pollution prevention techniques in the textile industry are quite well developed. The challenge is to make these attractive and viable for textile factory owners to adopt.
18. The proposal for centralized/common waste treatment facilities is not new in Bandung. There is an existing centralized industrial wastewater treatment plant at Cisirung and feasibility studies are being prepared for other areas with dense industrial activity: South Cimahi, Majalaya, and Rancaekek. Aside, however, from providing the physical infrastructure, incentives need to be put in place to ensure that factories are induced to connect to the system and are willing to pay user fees to maintain the service. Such incentives could include technical and financial assistance. Another form of incentive, perhaps the more important, is stringent regulatory enforcement of effluent standards.
19. A targeted approach to other sources of pollution should be built into the area water quality management plan. This should start with categorization of sources. Water pollution sources are generally classified into point and non-point (diffuse) sources. Much of the effort in controlling water pollution, whether by using traditional regulatory tools or relatively newer economic instruments, has focused on point sources as these are easier to identify and regulate. However, even with effective control of pollution coming from point sources, there is no guarantee that water quality will improve if no interventions are made to also control non-point sources. Within the point source category (mostly industrial and commercial establishments), a further categorization can be done according to type or size of sources and their wastewater characteristics. Such categorization will: (i) provide environmental managers (i.e., BPLHD, DLH) with information on the extent to which diffuse or non-point sources are contributing to pollution; (ii) for diffuse sources, facilitate identification of priorities for which targeted interventions can be developed (e.g., managing waste loads from riverside communities); and (iii) for point sources, classify the
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 36 ICWRMP EARF sources so that appropriate industry-specific controls can be developed (as in the case of Bandung).
20. The industry categorization is important in targeting support or incentives and in prioritizing regulatory enforcement. The current limited capacity of district environmental protection agencies necessitate that pollution sources be prioritized (e.g., for inspections). Assistance should be given to the districts in identifying: (i) establishments required to immediately comply with effluent standards; (ii) those for whom regulatory procedures can be simplified due to small size, non-toxic wastes, or good housekeeping (as evidenced by an EMS); and (iii) those that can be given flexibility to exceed standards temporarily subject to agreements on progressive demonstration of effort to meet standards (e.g., under PROKASIH) either by installing end-of-pipe controls, or by implementing environmental management systems and pollution prevention programs. The prioritization of pollution sources would also help focus the work of multi-sectoral monitoring teams—i.e., set up for each water quality management area—to assist district regulatory agencies in conducting surveillance of water pollution sources.
21. District environmental agencies maintain records on the establishments they regulate; these records are derived from past permit applications and self-monitoring reports. However, existing inventories only cover those establishments that have applied for license/permits. They only make up a portion of the total number that is actually discharging wastewater. District agencies need to expand the inventory of pollution sources, beginning with point sources--e.g., factories, commercial establishments, institutional facilities, sewerage collection and treatment systems. While it is not possible to set up direct inventories of non-point sources, indirect methods are possible. For instance, an examination of land use and settlements could identify zones according to type of domestic sewage management (e.g., absent, by septic tank or sewer), whereas an inventory of agricultural sources could classify these according to crop zones/types, degree of erosion (as sources of sediment) and agro-chemicals used.
22. Enforcement cannot happen in the absence of strong monitoring capability. The monitoring of discharges from pollution sources is the job of the district environment agencies. In pollution hotspots where pollution load quotas/limits should be imposed, compliance monitoring will have to go beyond measuring pollutant concentrations. Monitoring of pollutant loads (e.g., kilograms of BOD) require portable flow metering equipment to measure discharge rates. Yet even with additional equipment and vehicles, it may not be possible to greatly increase the compliance monitoring coverage given the large number of pollution sources. It is important, thus, for district units to come up with a program to prioritize coverage and compliance inspections. Priorities for inspections will be dictated not only by the size of the source’s discharge, but the impact of the discharge on the surrounding water bodies. As such, the monitoring will require a careful balancing of effort between monitoring of ambient water quality and monitoring of source-specific discharges.
4. Control of Pollution from Riverine Communities
23. Poor sanitation is a big contributor to water pollution in the basin. Sewerage service level (coverage) in 2003 was only 7.4% in Kabupaten Bandung, 23.5% in Kabupaten Karawang, 19.5% in Kabupaten Bekasi and 39.5% in Kodya Bekasi. The most common domestic effluent treatment system is the septic tank. Yet septic tank coverage is not as widespread as might be expected. Nor are the existing household septic tanks properly constructed and maintained. In Bandung City, for example, only 20% of about 60,000 septic tanks are thought to be properly constructed. In Bandung District, only 47% of households have septic tanks. The remainder use leaching pits (22%) or use open areas and watercourses (29%).
24. For communities close to the river banks, including those along the West Tarum Canal, traditional disposal of (liquid and solid) wastes directly into waterways is still widely practiced. As these wastes have the shortest path to the rivers, the source communities are a logical focus of
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 37 ICWRMP EARF sanitation improvement initiatives under the program. The preferred approach is provision of communal septic tanks. At Bandung City, there are now 4 pilot communal septic tanks, each serving around one hundred households. More are planned to be built, and one expected benefit— apart from water quality improvement-- is that these communal tanks would also supply treated water into the Citarum, thus augmenting flows in the dry season.
25. Three important lessons in water and sanitation have been learned over the last 30 years by the international community; these are: (i) to put people at the center of water and sanitation development; (ii) to respond to demand, rather than be driven by supply; and (iii) to recognize water as an economic good. These principles will guide sanitation improvements in tandem with water supply provision. Sanitation improvement initiatives under the program, targeted initially at riverine communities, are to be pursued in partnership with NGOs and community organizations.
26. A community-based organization active in the Bandung area, Warga Peduli Lingkungan (WPL), has been facilitating improvements to sanitation (domestic wastewater and solid waste management) by promoting public awareness and developing pilot communal septic tanks and solid waste disposal sites. The organization is active in 16 locations. WPL’s activities—after which the program interventions will be patterned—cover: (i) construction of communal sanitation and clean water systems; (ii) replication, promotion and development of community-based solid waste management; (iii) Re-greening and conservation of old riverbeds left over from previous re- channeling of the Citarum River through construction of cutoffs/by-passes; (iv) eco-education programs for communities; (v) riverbank conservation and refurbishment (waterfront gardens); and (vi) conduct of socialization and public awareness campaigns.
5. Rehabilitation of Degraded Watersheds
27. Watershed management under the program is premised principally on the need to rehabilitate the extensively denuded upper catchments in order to abate adverse effects on basin water supply and water quality. On the other hand, the most effective strategies for rehabilitating degraded watersheds are those that aim to re-establish basic ecosystem processes rather than those that rely too much on engineering measures. For instance, riverbank re-vegetation creates corridors for linking fragmented forest patches that help regenerate biodiversity and at the same time effectively combat (riverbank) erosion, a major cause of water turbidity in rivers. Measures that involve landform modification and engineering (e.g., land terracing, construction of check dams and gully plugs) are best applied as stop-gap solutions alongside longer term strategies for ecosystem restoration.
28. Spatial planning solutions to watershed rehabilitation and ecological protection, making use of landscape ecological planning principles, will be applied. The “re-greening“ areas would be carefully chosen to provide the best long-term possibility to protect water quality and quantity (riparian areas and spring catchment areas) and restore other landscape ecological functions. Degraded lands in riparian zones will be re-vegetated with bamboos and mixed assemblages of fruit trees that provide increased income opportunities for upland communities, as well as reduce erosion and contribute to conserving biodiversity. A landscape ecological assessment will be made to determine the best way to link vegetated areas to maximize watershed ecological functions.
29. The watershed spatial plan for “re-greening” will be compared with the West Java Provincial and District spatial plans (tata ruang) to assess concordance and resolution of any conflicts between the proposed zonations. The plan will then be subjected to multi-stakeholder for to accommodate stakeholder concerns and ensure wide acceptance prior to implementation. The steps are outlined as follows:
• Identify priority areas for rehabilitation (i.e., in terms of importance for sustainability of water resources);
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 38 ICWRMP EARF
• Develop spatial plan to link priority degraded areas to be rehabilitated to forested zones through vegetated riverine corridors; • Develop a strategic “re-greening’ spatial plan for the targeted areas/corridors; • Establish network of conservation model villages, and conservation groups within these model villages, in the target areas; • Conduct village preparation education in partnership with NGOs; • Prepare village action plans; • Implement village action plans and conservation activities.
B. Capacity Development for Environmental Management
1. Improved Basin Management Organization
30. The roadmap’s institutional component is designed to address current institutional arrangements that are characterized by highly sectoral divisions of work and lack of coordination, as well as weak enforcement despite the fact that regulatory frameworks and standards are generally in place (e.g. for pollution control). At present, responsibilities of water authorities (e.g., Directorate General of Water Resources, Jasa Tirta Public Corporation II) are limited to in-stream activities related mainly to irrigation, flood and drought management. They have little influence in off-stream management aspects dealing with problems of watershed deterioration, waste disposal and pollution and groundwater exploitation. A lack of coordination exists across sectors in the planning process with each agency developing its own plan in relative isolation of others. Examples include procedures for land use planning, zoning or spatial planning at district or city levels that do not adequately integrate constraints imposed by water availability.
31. Proposed institutional interventions are aligned with the objectives of the 2004 Water Law, centered on the establishment of an apex body to plan and coordinate water resources management in the basin. The apex body, in the form of a multi-sectoral water resources council, will have the task of preparing and formulating water resources policies and strategies. The roadmap institutional development component will enable the council to broadening basin management concerns beyond the current focus on irrigation, flood and drought management to cover watershed management, pollution control, water demand management, reducing over-use of groundwater, and development of sustainable financing mechanisms. Beyond providing a multi- sectoral forum to discuss issues, the council is expected to commission and oversee preparation of policy and strategy papers. As a priority, the council would commission a strategic review of the alternative options for meeting future water demand in the region.
32. The basin council will be supported by a proposed basin technical support organization, or Balai Besar, that will have the task of strategic basin planning based on policy guidance from the basin council. It will also provide regulatory oversight on the operation of water management functions, services and infrastructure works performed by state enterprises, local government units or even private entities under management contracts. Acting as a secretariat for the council, the Balai Besar would ensure broad-based participation by promoting stakeholder awareness. It will also provide guidelines and review spatial development plans prepared by local governments to ensure consistency with basin water and environment policy. Greater integration of land and water issues in spatial plan development, land use planning, land zoning procedures and conjunctive use of groundwater will be promoted through the council and Balai Besar basin organizations.
2. Improvement of Regulatory and Enforcement System
33. The State Ministry for Environment (MOE) established in 1982 essentially plays a policy and coordinating role and is not involved in on-ground regulatory enforcement. BAPEDAL, set up in 1990, was in charge of enforcement. However, its enforcement revolved mainly around the AMDAL process. Enforcement of pollution control laws was mandated to the provincial
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 39 ICWRMP EARF governments. Measures have been taken to clarify the relationship between MOE and BAPEDAL. The latter is now considered an integral arm of MOE. The regional BAPEDALDAs became BPLHDs (Badan Pengendalian Lingkungan Hidup Daerah) and were placed under the provincial government.
34. Historically, provincial governments exercised substantial powers in implementing environmental laws. With regard to water pollution control, Government Regulation (GR) #20 vested regulatory authority to the provincial governors who were also assigned to carry out water quality monitoring and surveillance of pollution sources. However, although the provincial governors were given regulatory power, so did various sectoral ministries that also have environmental management functions. For example, the Ministries of Industry and Agriculture have water quality-related mandates of their own, including their own penalty or sanction mechanisms. These powers overlapped with the authority of the governor. Throughout most of the 1990s, the enforcement of water pollution control regulations was often a joint task of the provincial government and the sectoral ministries, which was inefficient and not so effective.
35. Faced with a weak and fragmented regulatory enforcement system, BAPEDAL turned to cooperation approaches for dealing with polluters. It launched PROKASIH (clean rivers) program which used voluntary pollution reduction agreements with industrial water polluters. BAPEDAL subsequently turned the program into an environmental rating and public disclosure system called PROPER PROKASIH. These programs have only a limited focus (large polluters). Despite the early success of PROPER PROKASIH, the need for a strong regulatory system remains.
36. The decentralization drive in the late 1990s shifted authority over environmental management to the district level. Districts now assumed the tasks of (i) making inventories of water quality, (ii) establishing water quality standards (if standards need to be more stringent than MOE’s national standards), (iii) classifying water bodies according to beneficial uses and standards, (iv) determining effluent standards based on the water body classification, and (v) issueing permits to discharge wastewater.
37. The current weakness in the water quality regulatory system should thus be seen in light of the effects of the rapid decentralization that has thrust the districts into the frontline of environment regulation. Faced with simultaneous devolution of various public functions, environmental management has had to compete for the district government’s attention and limited resources. In some cases, organizational structures, staffing and capacity of the districts have not fully reflected these changes. Further changes will inevitably be required as a result of implementing the Water Law. Most districts are still in the process of formulating local regulations and system and procedures, or awaiting guidelines for how to streamline and coordinate these functions.
38. Although water quality standards are relatively well developed, enforcement is weak – in large part because district governments have yet to establish effective systems and procedures. It is proposed for the Basin Water Resources Council, through the Balai Besar, to set up a task force to prepare a basin-wide water quality management action plan. The latter would be developed along the following IWRM principles: (i) coordinated but decentralized planning of using a basin approach, (ii) multi-stakeholder participation in setting water quality management objectives, and (iii) capacity-building through awareness-raising combined with information systems for participatory and informed decision making. The aim is to enhance basinwide coordination and provide support to standardize and streamline district-level functions. Awareness raising and incentives to influence current behavior patterns of households, municipal agents and industry would be incorporated into the plan. It is also expected to give importance to managing water quality for the protection of water-based ecosystems, not just for human use. Permitting or licensing activities by the districts will be strengthened. For activities whose impacts cross district boundaries, the Balai Besar would provide a review role by screening licensing or permit applications to ensure compliance with the basin management plan.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 40 ICWRMP EARF
3. New Management Strategies (e.g., Raw Water and Wastewater Pricing)
39. Revenues from the sale of bulk water and hydro-electricity in the Citarum basin are insufficient to cover the full costs of water system operation and maintenance because: (i) not all water users contribute to financing O&M, (ii) the tariff for bulk water supply is too low, and (iii) the price paid for electricity generated is also low. As a result, inadequate maintenance has led to deterioration of the water infrastructure. A clear policy and legal framework is needed that sets out future principles for pricing, cost recovery, financing of externalities and subsidies. In the medium term, a more independent regulatory arrangement is required for setting of bulk water tariffs and the sale of electricity.
40. The basin water quality management framework proposed to be formulated under the roadmap is expected to introduce combined use of conventional regulatory methods, existing cooperation-based approaches (e.g., PROKASIH PROPER), and phasing in of economic instruments and other forms of incentives/disincentives. Proper pricing, which should cover both raw water and wastewater, are based on mechanisms intended to induce voluntary restraint on water use and wastewater disposal. Here, proper pricing does not mean setting prices exactly "right" (as in determining the scarcity value of raw water or the damage cost of water pollution). For an integrated water quality management framework, the aim is primarily to establish the principle that water resources have competing uses and, if used as waste sinks, entail costs that should be borne by the polluter. The basic principle is that the price charged for water should be set equal to its economic and environmental costs of supply, plus the cost of disposing wastewater.
41. Water supply sources in the basin come from surface water and groundwater. In theory, water use optimization means that the optimal mix of sources should be such that the marginal supply costs are about equal for both groundwater and surface water sources. For groundwater, the situation is that it is already over-exploited (physically in terms of pumping exceeding recharge) as well as economically in the sense that the marginal benefit from additional pumping outweighs the marginal cost, if such cost includes not just pumping cost but also economic externalities (e.g., ground subsidence and effect of worsening flood damage).
42. Raw water pricing means recovering the full supply cost of delivering raw water—the direct cost of the infrastructure, as well as the indirect cost of maintaining the source of water (watershed). Direct supply costs are relatively straightforward to estimate. They include building costs and operation and maintenance cost. The concept of indirect supply cost means actual costs associated with maintaining the raw water supply level or capacity. Indirect supply costs can be derived from cost of maintaining watersheds. In introducing a pricing mechanism to cover indirect supply costs, the assumption is that those costs will be included in the water price and that receipts will in fact be used to protect the watershed, not go to the general treasury. At present, Citarum water agencies engaged in revenue-generating activities (i.e. hydropower and bulk water supply) do not apportion a percentage of those revenues for watershed protection.
43. For industrial wastewater, pricing would be based on actual wastewater volumes and pollutant loads measured at the discharge point. The premise is not revenue generation for its own sake. Rather, because of the great variation in wastewater control costs across firms, there would be substantial savings in using economic instruments (in particular, a pollution charge system) as compared with reliance on uniform regulatory controls. The system forces polluters to choose the most economically efficient abatement method in order to reduce the wastewater charge they have to pay. The effect is to encourage polluters to develop cheaper, more effective means of pollution abatement.
44. However, wastewater pricing based on economic theories alone is quite impractical and difficult to explain in the public and political arena. An alternate approach is to set charges in relation to a target overall reduction in pollution load. This can be done if modeling support, through the Balai Besar, is available. Given data on pollution loads as well as treatment costs of
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 41 ICWRMP EARF target firms, one could model how individual firms would respond to various levels of the pollution charge. From this, the Balai Besar could derive a relationship between the level of the charge and the overall treatment achieved, which then translates to overall pollution load reduction. Yet a third approach is to simply set the charge to meet a target revenue. Such target revenue might be determined from the cost of administering the system and the budget for a water quality improvement program. This is the most straightforward approach, but also the least ideal in the sense of not being aimed at inducing “behavioral” change among polluters. If the charge is set too low, many firms will simply opt to pay, turning the charge into a “license” to pollute. Nonetheless, most countries with pollution charge systems use these primarily for revenue generation (to support water quality programs).
45. Properly set up, an advantage of a pollution charge system is that, unlike a system that relies exclusively on regulatory sanctions, a charge system creates an incentive to reduce pollution even below levels permitted by effluent standards because charges are applied on all units of the target pollutant (i.e., mass load or pollution load, rather than concentration). In case the discharge concentration violates the effluent standard, regulatory sanctions could still be applied, however. This means that the wastewater charge system is not to be seen as a substitute for regulatory instruments, and regulatory safeguards should still be in place to prevent misuse of the charge system.
4. Water Quality Monitoring
46. Water quality is a key indicator of IWRM effectiveness and sustainability. Although traditional water quality monitoring is usually set up to support regulatory enforcement, within an IWRM framework the objectives of water quality monitoring should be expanded to address policy and planning needs, specifically for area-based water quality management and development of new management strategies. Ambient water quality monitoring will have to be correlated closely with effluent/discharge monitoring, e.g., through modeling, so that pollution carrying capacities (for the intended beneficial use of the water body) are not exceeded. In the same manner that raw water is allocated to different uses, so too should the pollution carrying capacity of the water system be allocated to different sources. And whereas users of raw water are required to pay for its use, so too should polluters pay for using the water system as a sink for wastes.
47. Provincial and district environment agencies are usually focused on monitoring point sources of pollution, notably regulated establishments. However, a monitoring system that supports area-wide water quality management needs to cover not just industry sources, but various diffuse and unregulated (therefore undocumented) sources. In the context of an integrated water quality management framework, the monitoring system should also be supported by scientific tools and data management systems that enable examination of interactive effects of various pollution sources.
48. Under the leadership of the Basin Council and supported by the Balai Besar, the proposed area-based water quality action planning will focus on rationalizing the water quality monitoring system in the basin so that the scope of monitoring gradually expands to cover point and non-point pollution sources correlated with surface water quality (inland and coastal) and groundwater quality. The purpose of monitoring would go beyond regulatory enforcement, and would be designed to support policy and planning needs, scientific analysis (modeling), as well as public information and education needs. The formatting of water quality data would also have to change so that both time series and spatial attributes (locations) of pollution sources are captured in the monitoring system. Finally, the monitoring system should be comprehensively designed around key indicators so that reporting is systematic and comparison of performance across areas can be made easily.
49. There is also a need to establish mechanisms for collaborative monitoring and information management involving various agencies represented in the basin council, public stakeholder
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 42 ICWRMP EARF groups, and district government units. Public access to consolidated monitoring results using key indicators could be provided through the Internet.
5. Development of Database and Decision Support Tools
50. The database management system should be designed to enable district environment protection agencies to upload data on a regular basis to a central database covering the whole basin. The central database would be maintained by the Balai Besar, which in turn would link its database to the provincial database of BPLHD. Database contents will include water quality (ambient) conditions, and the sources of pollution (and their locations).
51. The database will have two sub-systems. One is for planning and management support that will track data on pollution sources and water quality, and linked to the modeling and mapping systems. The other sub-system supports the regulatory activities of the area, including the discharge licensing system and compliance monitoring system. Ideally, the database would be capable of generating: (i) summary reports; (ii) key indicator reports; (iii) reports in response to specific requests for information, and (iv) reports when a situation is detected by the system as unusual (e.g., water quality exceeding standards or critical thresholds for specific parameters). As such, the database would serve not just as a data processing and storage system, but more importantly as a management and decision-making support.
52. Relational databases alone are not very useful for planning and especially for public information and management support. Much of the information to be contained in the database is location-specific (e.g., point sources of pollution, differences in water quality along the stretch of a long river system). The database should thus be linked to a GIS so that information can be displayed visually, and reports generated in map format. Preferably, the water quality model, database, and GIS should all be linked.
53. The database system should also be designed to facilitate access to socio-economic information via meta-databases, i.e., databases that provide information on where to find the actual data. This enables users to track not just the status of water quality, but also the socio-economic conditions that act as driving forces or sources of pressure on the environment. BAPEDA-held databases could provide information on population and distribution, land uses, industrial development corridors and other economic activities.
54. Especially in the pollution “hot spots”, it will be necessary for district environmental protection agencies to build capability to relate water quality ambient conditions to water pollution loads – or to access a technical support unit that can provide such kind of analysis (e.g., through the Balai Besar). In polluted areas, pollution loads will have to be allocated (e.g., using pollution load quotas for identified sources). These quotas would have to be set so as to meet water quality targets. One way to do this is by trial and error, i.e., adjust pollution loads until the desired water quality targets are met. However, this is inefficient and time consuming. Industries also will have difficulty planning their pollution control activities if discharge quotas change very often. A better approach to correlating water quality with pollution loads is through modeling.
55. The main uses of water quality model (working in tandem with water quantity/balance models) are to guide decisions on allocating limits on pollution load particularly in hotspots, and as a means of educating stakeholders and informing the Basin Council on the impact of various policy options. Figure C-1 illustrates the use of modeling as a decision tool. Using the water quality model for an area, alternatives programs can be evaluated based on the impact on water quality. For example, a management option that does not include interventions in household wastewater management can be compared with one that includes sewage control. Also the effect of different options for allocating pollution loads can be predicted in terms of improvement in water quality in various parts of a river system. A GIS can be linked to the model which makes it easier
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 43 ICWRMP EARF
to communicate results, and also makes it useful as a public information and policy decision- support tool.
Figure C-1. Modeling for Decision Support
Policy/Regulatory Options • Discharge standards Water quality • Wastewater charges management plans • Effluent quotas and scenarios • Technologies Data from ambient water quality Model monitoring Projected Water impact on water Guidance for Quality quality, other decision- Model model making parameters Data from monitoring of pollution sources
C. Environmental Impact Mitigation and Monitoring Measures
56. Shown in Table C-1 are safeguard/mitigation measures for the identified projects under the roadmap that may have some adverse environmental impacts, notably the program items under the water utilization key area. An assessment of the significance of these impacts was presented in the preceding chapter. Also shown are key impact monitoring parameters.
57. Only two projects in the ICWRMP roadmap have feasibility studies which were prepared during Phase II of the PPTA: the West Tarum Canal rehabilitation and the Cisangkuy watershed rehabilitation.
58. The other projects identified in the roadmap do not yet have detailed specifications to allow for systematic impact assessment, mitigation planning, impact monitoring and institutional arrangements. The Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARP) described in the next chapter will be prescribed for use in these subsequent project planning activities. Note that the monitoring arrangements developed following the EARP focus on the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. Beneficial environmental impacts associated with many of the roadmap projects – including sustainability indicators -- will be identified and monitored within the project design (logframe) and implementation frameworks developed individually for these projects.
Table C-1. Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Parameters for Roadmap Projects ACTIVITIES SAFEGUARDS AND MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING PARAMETERS Upgrading of Water As tunneling debris are expected to be mainly coarse • Clearing of worksite, particularly Sources for Irrigation at: materials, these should be deposited in areas not stripping of vegetation vulnerable to flooding and washout, and located on Handling and disposal of debris • Upper Cipunegara stable ground/slopes to prevent slumping. Use of • from diversion tunnel construction • Cipancuh temporary spoil sites should be avoided. At the tunneling areas closest to the river diversion and inter- • Timing of construction work, connection points, silt traps should be used to prevent particularly tunneling excessive water turbidity. Around the debris disposal • Bidding documents, contractor areas, adequate drainage should be provided. plans and compliance reports for Tunneling work should be maximized during the dry disposal of construction waste season. • Communities affected by Use the spoils as a resource where possible. construction Depending on their actual grain size composition, these • Water turbidity caused by could be used as base material for improving construction activities and provision service/inspection roads in the irrigation area proposed
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 44 ICWRMP EARF
ACTIVITIES SAFEGUARDS AND MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING PARAMETERS to be expanded. of silt traps to minimize dispersal of Bidding documents should include technical sediment specifications for the prevention of adverse effects from construction. Each contractor invited to bid will have to explain the methods of construction to be used and the measures to avoid or reduce negative impacts. The soundness of these measures should be part of the selection criteria for awarding the contract.
Affected communities should be informed of the disruptions to be expected and their duration, and contractor should be required to prepare debris disposal and nuisance minimization plans. Contractor should also plan works without need for cutting-off the downstream flow. Upgrading of the water Disposal areas for the sediments removed from the • Handling and disposal of sediment source for irrigation at irrigation canals should be properly sited so that these removed from the irrigation canals Ciherang areas are not susceptible to washout or slumping, and Water turbidity caused by canal these areas should be re-vegetated. Before areas are • desilting works designated as spoil grounds, the contractor should examine the physical suitability of the site and also • Bidding documents, contractor assess possible beneficial uses of the material, e.g., for plans and compliance reports for canal embankments. disposal of construction waste and sediment spoil It is preferable that spoil be disposed in areas with similar sediment characteristics as these are likely to be • Communities affected by more stable. Also, plant and biological communities are construction likely to become re-established more rapidly.
Implementation of bulk Construction debris from tunneling should be deposited For inter-basin transfer option: water supply alternative in areas not vulnerable to flooding and washout, and • Clearing of worksite and removal of for Bandung through: located on stable ground to prevent slumping. Use of vegetation temporary spoil sites should be avoided. At the Handling and disposal of debris • Inter-basin water tunneling areas closest to the river inter-connection • from tunnel construction and timing transfer from points, silt traps should be used to prevent excessive of works, including turbidity in Cibatarua water turbidity. Around the debris disposal areas, affected rivers • Pumping from the adequate drainage should be provided. Saguling reservoir • Communities affected by Adoption of inter-basin water transfer scheme would construction require parallel improvement in water use efficiency in the Cibatarua irrigation areas to adjust for diminished • Bidding documents and contractor water supply. Measures to compensate for loss of plans/compliance reports on supplies to the Cibatarua system need to be developed, construction method and debris e.g., parallel development of a water impounding disposal reservoir at Santosa to ensure adequate water supply • Irrigated area at Cibatarua irrigation for Cibatarua, or establishment of scheme for payment system during summer season (to of the bulk water transfers. If the transfer scheme is monitor effect of reduced water implemented, water treatment plant and downstream supply caused by diversion) distribution works for Bandung will need to be enlarged. If the Saguling option is selected, the point of For Saguling pumping option: abstraction should be located as far as possible from the polluted part of the reservoir inlet (Nanjung). The • Dislocation caused by alignment reservoir’s starfish shape may allow selection of a and construction of pipeline relatively less polluted “arm” of the reservoir to be used • Clearing of worksites and removal as diversion point—although this could increase the of vegetation pipeline distance and pumping head. The alignment of the pipeline should minimize dislocation of settlements. • Water quality after treatment to ensure removal of any toxic Any option selected for increasing the raw water supply contaminants of Bandung should incorporate the following • Reduction in power generation safeguards: capacity at the hydro-electric plant
• All stakeholders should be actively involved in the planning, design and implementation of program For any option selected for increasing components (stakeholder-driven process). Bandung’s raw water supply: • Emphasis should also directed at water demand management and conservation, particularly the • Shifting of industry users to reduction of urban water system losses as well as surface water source (by irrigation requirements. connection to PDAM) and capping of industry wells • Wastewater and sewerage systems in Bandung should be improved, as increased water supply • Management of wastewater means more wastewater generation.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 45 ICWRMP EARF
ACTIVITIES SAFEGUARDS AND MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING PARAMETERS
• More vigorous law enforcement on industrial • Demand management, including pollution, and the application of economic incentives reduction of losses in the water in favor of investments in wastewater treatment system plants by industries. Rehabilitation of the Disposal areas for the sediments removed from the • Handling and disposal of sediment West Tarum Canal for canal should be properly sited so that these are not and vegetation debris removed improved water resource susceptible to washout or slumping. Possible beneficial from the canal, including safeguard utilization uses of the material should be maximized, including provisions in bidding documents, use for topping of service road embankments. The contractor plans and compliance proposed spoil grounds at the old riverbeds (for reports disposal of the fine fraction of dredged materials) Presence of toxic contaminants in should be examined for impacts on local drainage. • the dredged sediment Dredging spoils must be dewatered before moving so that these are dry enough to be transported without • Provision of adequate silt traps to excessive spilling on canal banks and roads. It is prevent sediment dispersion preferable that dredging spoil be disposed in areas with downstream similar sediment characteristics as these are likely to be • Water turbidity more stable. Also, plant and biological communities are likely to become re-established more rapidly. • Canal discharge to monitor reduction of water flow caused by As the West Tarum Canal is close to urbanized areas rehabilitation works (around Cikarang and Bekasi), the potential • Adequacy of drainage for contamination status of sites to be dredged should be access/service road improvement established prior to dredging. Concentration in the works sediment of a range of organic and heavy metal contaminants must be measured before dredging is • Communities affected by started. The selection of the sediment contaminants to rehabilitation works, including be checked should be based on an assessment of the impact on households affected by surrounding land use and potential sources of limiting the open access to the contamination. canal (e.g., provision of alternate water source, toilet facilities) Implement measures to minimize effect of disruption Nuisance caused by rehabilitation due to dredging and road construction works and • works including noise, dust, traffic impact on any communities affected by restricting the congestion on service roads current open access to the canal.
Require contractor to prepare spoil and other debris disposal plan and to post bond to ensure compliance. Require also to include in plan various measures to minimize nuisance to nearby communities. The contractor should plan works without need for cutting-off the downstream flow.
Irrigation system Alternatives to exclusive chemical pest control should • Changes in cropping intensity in modernization and be promoted, e.g., integrated pest management (IPM). relation to use of agricultural service improvement for The latter is essentially a strategy of more than one chemicals (fertilizers and areas covered by: method of pest control, with chemical control pesticides) (pesticides) resorted to only as a last resort and based • West Tarum Canal on economic thresholds. • Concentration of nutrients that • East Tarum Canal cause eutrophication (N and P), • North Tarum Canal Studies at the International Rice Research Institute and pesticide residues in farm show that farmers practicing IPM can significantly drainage water reduce insecticide usage with no reduction in crop yield. Water use rates (to monitor Yield and profit were found more stable from IPM • effectiveness of SRI) practices compared to traditional practice of prophylactic (frequent) treatment. IPM should be combined with System Rice Intensification (SRI). Both are knowledge-based practices. Adoption and success depend on training farmers (including extension workers). An investment in developing an SRI-IPM package using a farming systems approach would be required. Requirements for effective SRI-IPM are probably site-specific. These requirements include carrying out crop loss assessments to pinpoint prime pests and determine economic thresholds; understanding the pest and their natural enemies' ecology; selection of resistant varieties; and coordination of farm activities including the timing of intermittent flooding under SRI. The mode of extending the technology to farmers must be carefully planned.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 46 ICWRMP EARF
ACTIVITIES SAFEGUARDS AND MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING PARAMETERS Implementation of flood Preferred approach is a flood management strategy Depending on the flood mitigation mitigation measures that focuses on non-structural measures and which measure adopted, if structural: enable adjustment of land use and settlement patterns, including adjustment of farming systems to adapt to the • Long term effect of engineering perennial flooding. This strategy entails not relying on measures on the river morphology, building large infrastructure for flood protection—except e.g., riverbed accretion due to for the urgent/necessary flood defense in areas subject effect of embankments to destructive mudflows that put lives at risk, as in • Inadvertent effect of shifting Bandung, and rehabilitation of existing flood protection flooding problem from upstream to works to accommodate bigger floods. downstream, e.g., due to effect of The strategy should incorporate a combination of constructing river cutoffs watershed rehabilitation and flood plain management through land use controls that reduce risks to populated areas. Conservation of wetlands should also be emphasized. These help to absorb floods while providing benefit of habitat protection.
Community-driven Improvement of individual or communal sanitation • Disposal of construction waste initiatives for improved facilities (e.g., excavation of septic tanks), as well as Neighborhood nuisance rural water supply and construction of community garbage collection facilities, • minimization sanitation, especially for may temporarily cause neighborhood disruption and riparian communities nuisance. To the extent that these are unavoidable, • Distance of septic tanks from provide adequate planning for community involvement creeks and wells used for water in planning activities. Septic tanks should not be supply constructed closer than 15 m from wells and creeks used for water supply. A stakeholder forum should be established specifically to address the water supply and sanitation issues confronting the Bandung sub-basin. Such a forum could be in the form of a standing committee or working group within the river basin organization.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 47 ICWRMP EARF
Annex D. Template Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMMP)
Monitoring Resources Environmental Mitigation Implementation Monitoring Frequency Responsibility and Impacts Measures Arrangements Parameters and Budget Locations
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 48 ICWRMP EARF
Annex E. Excerpts from Tranche 1 IEE Illustrating EMMP
1. Based on the project selection criteria and as validated by stakeholders, the priority ICWRMP activities selected for inclusion in Tranche 1, over a five-year implementation period, are as follows: Table E-1. Tranche 1 Project Components Tranche 1 Project Component Main Activities
Institutional Strengthening for IWRM • Capacity Building and Support • Data and Modeling • "State-of-the-Basin" Reporting • Basin Planning Water Supply Options and Improved Groundwater • Options for Increase in Surface Water Supplies Management for Bandung. • Improved implementation of regulations for sustainable groundwater • management in Bandung • Improvements to groundwater monitoring network • Establishment of, and ongoing support for, a stakeholder forum for • Bandung Sub-Basin under Citarum Basin WRC Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal • Detailed Engineering Design • Tendering • Construction of Improvement Works Roll-Out of System Rice Intensification • Appraisal of Target Areas • Capacity Building • Progressive implementation of SRI Community-driven Initiatives for Improved Water • Capacity Building and Planning and Catchment Management • Implementation and Ongoing Support Basin Water Quality Improvement Strategy and • Policies and Procedures for Water Quality Management Action Plans • Improvements to Water Quality Monitoring and Data Management • Development of Organizational Capacity • Preparation of Basin-Wide River Quality Improvement Strategy • Preparation and Implementation of Area-Based Pollution Sources • Management Action Plans Productive Reforestation of Degraded • Spatial planning for reforestation Catchments • Village action plans for reforestation • Institutional development • Improvement of village land tenure arrangements with Perum Perhutani • Alternative livelihoods for displaced upland forest villagers Protected Area Management (Biodiversity) • Data gathering, investigations and action planning • Implementation
2. Summarized in Table E-2 are the environmental impacts expected from the various Tranche 1 components, considering both positive and negative impacts and their significance. Also shown is the environmental impact category, based on the IEE findings.
Table E-2. Impact Assessment Summary for Tranche 1 Component Projects ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EXPECTED ADB COMPONENT NOTES ENVIRONMENT Beneficial Adverse IMPACT CATEGORY Monitoring and evaluation Institutional of beneficial impact will be Strengthening for Indirect, highly None incorporated in the C IWRM significant and long term component’s
implementation framework Water Supply Indirect, highly None (as far the Adverse impacts of C Options and significant in terms of planning for options implementing the selected
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 49 ICWRMP EARF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EXPECTED ADB COMPONENT NOTES ENVIRONMENT Beneficial Adverse IMPACT CATEGORY Improved groundwater is concerned). option will be addressed Groundwater management (to relieve during planning itself Management for excessive pressure on Bandung the resource)
Moderately Adverse impacts due Rehabilitation of the Direct, significant in significant in relation mainly to construction West Tarum Canal terms of water quality to canal dredging to works; no new adverse B improvement especially restore capacity,; impacts are expected from for supply to Jakarta adverse impacts can continued operation of the be mitigated rehabilitated canal Somewhat uncertain Direct, significant in (depending on The EMP describes terms of water Roll-Out of System intensity of future measures to combine SRI conservation and shift to Rice Intensification chemical pesticide with integrated pest organic fertilizers C (SRI) use); adverse management in order to (required for improving impacts related to reduce reliance on paddy soil structure for pesticide use can be chemical pesticides SRI effectiveness) mitigated Localized impacts related Direct, highly significant to construction of Community-driven cumulative benefits for communal septic tanks; Initiatives for improving water supply the provision of community Improved Water and and water quality in Minimal, localized water supply also serves C Catchment areas occupied by and can be mitigated to mitigate community Management riverine communities water supply disruption (basinwide, including due to WTC rehabilitation, areas along the WTC) i.e., for residents that draw water from the canal Improvement in capacity Development and for water quality Implementation of management and Basin River Quality Indirect, highly None monitoring will also apply C Improvement significant and long-term to the operation of the Strategy and Action rehabilitated West Tarum Plans Canal Direct, highly significant Environmental cumulative benefits in management objectives go Productive terms of ameliorating beyond protection of water Reforestation and watershed degradation resources and Biodiversity None C (to sustain water supply encompasses the overall Protection and mitigate flooding) basin environment; (GEF-funded) and enhancing beneficial effects are biodiversity synergistic
3. The Tranche 1 activity with the most significant potential adverse environmental impact is the dredging works associated with the West Tarum Canal rehabilitation. Summarized in Table E-3 are the potential adverse impacts of this activity.
Table E-3 Potential Adverse Impacts of Dredging as Part of WTC Rehabilitation During Pre-Rehabilitation Pre-rehabilitation activities involving maintenance dredging is already creating turbidity impacts. However, there are no reports of adverse effects on the operation of the irrigation facilities and PDAM-Bekasi abstraction of water from the canal. During Rehabilitation Increased water turbidity downstream of the canal undergoing dredging and rehabilitation; Increased water turbidity downstream of the Bekasi River during construction of Bekasi siphon; Odor, nuisance and traffic disruption due to sediment piling on canal banks for drying before hauling to disposal sites; Reduction in area available for rice farming, as well as silt runoff onto the paddy fields due to sediment disposal on ex-riverbeds; Area disruption and nuisance due to increased traffic, noise and odor from dredging activities; and Reduced access by residents that draw water from the canal or use it for cleaning/bathing.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 50 ICWRMP EARF
During Operation Fencing of the populated sections of the canal from (Cikarang to Bekasi) will restrict people’s access to the waterway for drawing water and washing purposes.
4. Table E-4 summarize the safeguard/mitigation measures for specific activities under Tranche 1 that, based on the assessment, have some adverse impacts, i.e., the component on rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal, particularly due to the required dredging works. Shown in Table E-5 are the important monitoring parameters related to the mitigation measures.
Table E-4. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures Implementation
Minimize the need for and volume of dredging by taking into account During the detailed design of the WTC rehabilitation, the reduction in projected water supply requirement for irrigation. PMU shall re-examine the assumptions for the Although WTC’s present conveyance capacity is insufficient to cope projection of peak water demand to be supplied by with future peak water demands, it may not be necessary to restore its the canal. If projected future water demand is lower dimensions to the original 1960s design, particularly in the lower than the canal’s original design capacity, then the reaches where the future peak demand from irrigation is projected to volume of dredging and excavation required can be decrease to due land conversion from agriculture to urban use. reduced. Therefore, the waterway area need not be dredged or excavated to restore the original flow capacity, thus reducing the volume of the dredging works.
Each section of the canal should be tested for bottom sediment Until PJT II is able to routinely monitor heavy metals contamination prior to dredging. If contaminants are present, double silt and other toxics, sediment testing and monitoring traps should be used to prevent dispersion of sediment. shall be done by the PMU (through its EMO) and a contracted service laboratory. Dredging spoils must be dewatered before moving to allow the foul Contractor shall be required to submit turbidity smell to subside and so that these are dry enough to be transported to control and spoil disposal plans and contingency the spoil banks without excessive spilling on roads. measures, which will be included in the bid proposals Use dredging spoils as resource. Coarse sediments could be used as and evaluation. Plan for works shall include the development of the ex-riverbed dumpsites for tree base material for improving inspection roads in the irrigation service nursery (Curug, Cibeet and Cikarang) and park areas. (Bekasi). The cost of these measures will be built The ex-riverbed dump sites for the soft sediments could be developed into the contractor’s budget. Contractor shall be as nurseries to supply seedlings for reforestation or urban greening. At required to post bond to ensure compliance. the ex-riverbed disposal areas for spoil, adequate drainage should be provided to prevent flooding and washout of deposited sediments. The area allocated for sediment disposal should be surrounded by protective embankment/bunds to prevent silt runoff into the surrounding areas. A security fence should be installed to prevent contact between farmers/residents and fresh sediments.
Odor from dredged anaerobic sediment is to be expected. Although the Contractor plan shall include measures to minimize smell subsides within a few days of exposure to air, residents in the nuisance to nearby communities. Contractor will also immediate vicinity of the dredging should be informed and assured that be responsible for notifying communities of the foul smell is temporary. temporary nuisance to be expected, and for providing adequate signs and detours in the work
areas.
Affected communities should be informed of the disruptions to be The bid documents shall require contractor to plan expected and their duration, and contractor should be required to works without need for cutting-off the downstream prepare spoil disposal and nuisance minimization plans. Contractor flow. The soundness of these measures should be should also plan the works without need for cutting-off the downstream part of the criteria for awarding work contracts. flow. The PMU, through the community initiatives Alternative source of water supply should be provided to communities component of Tranche1 and assisted by a along the canal that tap water from the stream or use it for community water supply consultant, shall develop washing/bathing purposes. design and construction guidelines—to be used by NGOs assisting the communities in constructing the alternative water supply facilities (groundwater wells). Cost built into the Tranche component on community initiatives for water supply and sanitation improvement.
Alternatives to exclusive chemical pest/weed control should be The Directorate-General for Land and Water under promoted, e.g., integrated pest management (IPM). The latter is the Ministry of Agriculture (as the envisioned project essentially a strategy of more than one method of pest control, with implementing agency), with support from a project chemical control (pesticides) resorted to only as a last resort and based consultant (expert on SRI-IPM), will implement the on economic thresholds. combined SRI-IPM approach to enhance environmental soundness and sustainability of the IPM should be combined with System Rice Intensification (SRI). Both project. are knowledge-based practices. Requirements for effective SRI-IPM
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 51 ICWRMP EARF
Mitigation Measures Implementation are site-specific. The mode of extending the technology to farmers must be carefully planned.
Provide adequate measures for community information and The PMU, through the community initiatives involvement in water supply and sanitation planning. component of Tranche 1 and assisted by sanitation consultant, shall develop design and construction Septic tanks should have sealed bottoms and should not be guidelines for communal septic tanks—to be used by constructed closer than 15 m from wells and creeks used for water partner NGOs assisting the communities in properly supply. constructing the facilities. Stakeholder forums should be established to address community water Budget is built into the Tranche 1 component on supply and sanitation issues and options confronting the Bandung sub- community initiatives (for water supply and sanitation basin and communities along the WTC. improvement)
Table E-5. Monitoring Parameters, Responsibilities and Resources Monitoring Resources and Location and Frequency Responsibilities Items/Parameters Budget Construction Method/Activities • Equipment and method used Monitor at all sections of the Contractor(s) will be required Cost of measures will be for dredging canal that are contracted for to submit detailed construction built into the contractor’s construction, dredging or plan considering the bid/budget for the works. • Conformity to safeguards excavation. safeguards in Annex 7, built into contractor’s contract including specific plan for Cost of monitoring (see Annex 7) Monitoring to be done handling of construction activity by construction • Handling of sediment and through unannounced visits debris, including dredged supervisor shall be water hyacinth removed from and inspection of sediment and water hyacinths incorporated into the the canal for drying along construction or dredging sites removed. Contractor shall be budget for the PMU. canal banks prior to hauling at least once every three required to post bond to days. ensure compliance. Provision of adequate silt • traps to prevent sediment Construction supervisor of the dispersion downstream; use PMU will be responsible for of double silt traps for ensuring compliance and sections where contaminated corrective action by contractor. sediments are found based
on results of bottom sediment analysis done prior to dredging each section Nuisance Impacts • Odor from dredging of Monitor for occurrence and Contractor plan shall include The cost of nuisance anaerobic sediments, and severity of nuisance impacts measures to minimize control and public from dewatering of dredging at the actual construction and nuisance to nearby information measures spoils on canal banks before dredging sites. communities. Contractor will will be built into the hauling to disposal sites. also be responsible for contractor’s bid/budget. Monitor through notifying communities of • Other nuisance caused by unannounced visits and temporary nuisance to be Cost of monitoring rehabilitation works including inspection of construction or expected, and for providing activity by construction noise, dust, traffic congestion dredging sites at least once adequate signs and detours in supervisor shall be on service roads every three days. the work areas. incorporated into the budget for the PMU.
Disruption of Water Conveyance • Canal flow/discharge to Same as water flow Based on the construction Cost of WTC flow monitor any reduction of monitoring schedule used by schedule, PJT II shall give monitoring/measuremen water flow caused by PJT II, at the existing water advance information to t is built into the rehabilitation works, e.g., due flow measurement points irrigation managers and water operating budget of PJT to possible flow constriction along the canal. supply utilities on any II. around the silt curtains in the expected water flow disruption dredging sites or reduction.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 52 ICWRMP EARF
Monitoring Resources and Location and Frequency Responsibilities Items/Parameters Budget Water Quality • Conventional parameters (color, temperature, pH, DO, Conventional parameters to Monthly monitoring of Cost of PJT II monitoring BOD, total suspended solids, be monitored according to conventional water quality of conventional total dissolved solids, PJT II’s ongoing monthly parameters shall continue to parameters is incoprated surfactants, oil and grease, schedule of water sampling be done by PJT II using its in its operating budget Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and analysis at 14 points personnel and laboratory (assistance in training, Phenols, total Coliform, fecal along the WTC and two facilities at Curug. PJT II shall capacity building and Coliform points downstream of the provide monthly reports to the facilities will be provided Bekasi River. PMU who shall alert contractor under a $6.45 M • Water turbidity at and near of water quality degradation Tranche 1 water quality construction sites Water turbidity at three points and require corrective improvement project, (suspended solids) of 1 km interval downstream measures. described in Annex 8). • Heavy metals (Arsenic, of construction and dredging Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, sites to be monitored on a The PMU shall be responsible Budget for turbidity Mercury, Zinc) weekly basis for the duration for more frequent monitoring of monitoring is Rp 3M per of works. water turbidity affected by month over the Other toxic substances (PCB, • construction activities. construction period. Phenols, Cyanide) Heavy metals, other toxic • Pesticides (based on substances and pesticide Until PJT II is able to routinely Budget for monitoring of parameters listed in residues shall be monitored monitor heavy metals and heavy metals and toxics Governor of West Java at least once every quarter at other toxics, such monitoring is Rp 30M per quarter Decree No 38/1991 and PJT II’s 14 sampling points shall be done by the PMU over the construction 39/2000 for Class B, C, D along the canal. (through its EMO) and a period. water bodies). contracted service laboratory.
Sediment Contamination • Heavy metals (Arsenic, Prior to the works, testing for The PMU (through its For each of the four Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, bottom sediment Environment Management sections of the canal to Mercury, Zinc) contaminants shall be done Office) shall contract an be dredged: Rp 50M once for each section of accredited laboratory to carry (total Rp 200M) • Other possible contaminants canal to be dredged. out bottom sediment sampling (TPH, PCB, fecal Coliform) and analysis. Results are to be If for, example, fecal coliform communicated formally to the Since there are no Indonesian levels exceed 2 million MPN dredging contractor so that standards for sediment per gram (the limit set for measures to minimize contamination, it is Class B biosolids under the sediment dispersal (installation recommended that USEPA USEPA guideline) then of double silt screens in the Guide to Part 503 Biosolids Rule dredged sediments should affected areas if significant be used as basis for determining not be disposed in the Bekasi levels of contaminants are significant levels of sediment and Cikarang dumpsites present) are implemented. contaminants. which are close to human settlements and for the dredged sediments to be sprayed with chlorine prior to transport to the Curug or Cibeet dump sites. Disposal of Dredged Sediments • Drying and hauling of spoil Monitoring shall be done at Based on the bottom sediment Cost of disposal of the roadside embankments testing results for sections of sediments are built into • Adequacy of drainage for and ex-riverbed sites. canal to be dredged (i.e., grain the contractor’s budget access/service road size, composition, for dredging, which will improvement works Monitoring to be done contaminants), contractor will include (as provided in • Adequacy of measures to through unannounced visits determine location of sediment the bid documents) control erosion of sediments and inspection of sediment disposal and appropriate protection/development in ex-riverbed sites. disposal areas. handling/transport precautions. of ex-riverbed dumpsites The PMU through the for tree nurseries or Use of dredging spoils, e.g., • construction supervisor shall other beneficial land as base material for review and approve the use. improving inspection roads in contractor’s handling and the irrigation service areas disposal of sediments for each and development of the ex- section of the canal to be riverbed spoil dump sites as dredged. nurseries to supply seedlings for reforestation or urban greening.
Disruption of Community Water Supply Monitoring of community Monitoring shall be done by Both mitigation and • Adequate provision of complaints shall be done at NGOs engaged under the monitoring cost are built alternative water supply all populated sections of the Tranche 1 component on into the Tranche 1 sources and sanitation canal. provision of community water component on facilities for WTC residents supply through community community initiatives (for
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 53 ICWRMP EARF
Monitoring Resources and Location and Frequency Responsibilities Items/Parameters Budget that use the canal mobilization. water supply and sanitation improvement)
Community Health • Incidence of water-related Monitoring locations and The PMU shall be responsible Cost of monitoring shall illnesses frequency shall follow health for consolidating community be incorporated into the survey protocols used by the health data from the district budget for the PMU. district health offices. health offices to detect any deviation/increase in reported incidence of water-related illnesses from the norm (based on past records). Siting and construction of communal septic tanks Monitoring shall be done at The PMU, through the Both mitigation and • Distance of septic tanks from the community sites on a community initiatives monitoring cost are built creeks and wells used for weekly basis over the component of Tranche 1 and into the Tranche 1 water supply duration of the activity. assisted by sanitation component on consultant, shall develop community initiatives (for • Disposal of septic tank design and construction water supply and construction waste guidelines for communal septic sanitation improvement) • Neighborhood nuisance tanks—to be used by NGOs minimization during assisting the communities in construction monitoring construction of facilities. • Maintenance of communal toilets and septic tanks System Rice Intensification • Cropping intensity Monitoring to be done at Directorate-General for Land Cost of SRI-IPM each pilot site for the SRI and Water under the Ministry integration (or other • Change in quantity and introduction. of Agriculture (as the measures to improve frequency of pesticide use envisioned project pest management • Water use rates (to monitor Each SRI site to be implementing agency), with without reliance on effectiveness of SRI in water monitored at least three support from a project chemical pesticides) conservation) times during each cropping consultant (expert on SRI- built into the design of season. IPM). the project • Allocation of water saved through SRI
5. The expected AMDAL classification of the Tranche 1 components is shown in Table E-6.
Table E-6. Expected AMDAL Classification of Tranche 1 Projects AMDAL Component Notes Classification Institutional Strengthening for IWRM Mainly centered on basin council Exempt establishment/strengthening Insofar as the project mainly involves planning for Water Supply Options and Improved options and monitoring of groundwater; during project Groundwater Management for Bandung Exempt development for the selected option, EIA-ANDAL may
be required Rehabilitation of West Tarum Canal Based on the AMDAL criteria of dredging involving EIA-ANDAL 3 removal of more than 500,000 m of sediment
Roll-Out of System Rice Intensification (SRI) May be required to prepare IEE-UKL/UPL focused on Exempt pesticides management Community-driven Initiatives for Improved Water IEE would assess localized impacts related to and Catchment Management IEE-UKL/UPL construction of communal septic tanks in Bandung and Bekasi Development and Implementation of Basin River Project is essentially capacity strengthening and Exempt Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans environmental remediation Productive Reforestation and Biodiversity Protection Exempt Project is environmental remediation (GEF-funded)
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 54 ICWRMP EARF
Annex F. AMDAL Guidelines
These guidelines give a brief description of the information expected to be covered in the environment management plan and environment monitoring plan under AMDAL.
A. TOR of ANDAL
1. Determine Scope of the Study: (i) activity status; (ii) alternatives (location, design, process, etc); (iii) initial environment description; (iv) proposed scoping, and (v) result of scoping workshop. The procedure for scoping is as follows:
Activity descrpition
Hypothetic Important Priority o Hypothetic Potential Impact Impact Impact
Initial Environment
Identification of Evaluation of Classification & Potential Impact Potential Impact Priority
During scoping, project proponent must clearly identify: (i) all activity components, (ii) activity components that may have adverse environmental impact; (iii) nature of potential impacts, (iv) parameter/aspect of the environment expected to be affected, (v) impact source/cause, (vi) sampling location (if any), (vii) data collection and analysis method, and (viii) impact assessment and expertise need (including time durations).
2. Specify Study Method: (i) data collection & analysis method; (ii) impact prediction method (including profession judgment), and (iii) impact evaluation method. 3. Provide Implementation Information on the Study: (i) proponent identity; (ii) identity of the study preparer; (iii) financing for the study, and (iv) time schedule for study.
B. Environment Impact Assessment (ANDAL)
1. Activity Plan: (i) identity of the proponent and preparer of the study; (ii) explanation of the boundary activity, location, map, activity for each phase (pre-construction, construction and operation); (iii) alternatives plan (e.g., alternative location, design, process, etc.); (iv) relationship with other activities. 2. Baseline environment assessment: describe/explain the current status/state of the environment. 3. Scope of the Study: (i) identify all important impacts, (ii) area of the study and time schedule 4. Impact Assessment: Items required to be analyzed here is the difference of environment condition (with and without the proposed activity) and also various kinds of impacts (direct and indirect). The study preparer must pay attention to the various aspects of the impact analysis (social aspects, physico-chemical aspects, biology, etc). 5. Important Impact Evaluation: from the impact assessment, identify the most significant impacts and mitigation measures and provide recommendations.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 55 ICWRMP EARF
C. Environmental Management Plan (UKL)
1. Significant impact and source of impact: (i) Environmental component or parameter affected with significant impact; (ii) Source of impact; types of activity resulting to big and significant impact. 2. Standard units to measure impact: must be based on the standards stipulated by government regulations. 3. Purpose of environmental management plan: the description of the purpose of the environmental management plan should be specific. For example, the strategic impact to manage in a pulp and paper industrial plant is water pollution. The specific purpose of environmental management is to control quality of waste disposed in the environment, particularly BOD, COD, TSS and pH parameters, so as not to exceed the existing quality standards. 4. Environmental management: environmental management can be made through technological, socio-economic and/or institutional approaches. 5. Location of environmental management: the location to be covered by the environmental management plan shall take into account the spread of impact. A map/sketch/drawing with sufficient scale should be prepared in this regard. 6. Environmental management period: when and how long this activity is to be implemented. 7. Environmental management institutions: responsibilities lie on two personalities, namely: the management executive and the management supervisor. Relationships and coordination with relevant institutions are to be included in the plan.
D. Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL)
1. Big and significant impact monitored: (i) Types of environmental parameters considered strategic to be monitored; (ii) Indicators of components to be monitored, i.e., the relevant indicators for waste water quality are pH, BOD, temperature, color, smell, oil, and presence of heavy metals. 2. Sources of impact: (i) Direct impact: describe any activity resulting in impact; (ii) Indirect impact: change in other environmental parameters due to the indirect effects of the source of impact. 3. Environmental parameters that are to be monitored: covers biological, chemical, physical as well socio-economic and cultural parameters. 4. Purpose of environmental monitoring plan: the description of the purpose of the environmental monitoring plan should be specific. For example, the strategic impact to monitor in a pulp and paper industrial plant is water pollution. The specific purpose of environmental monitoring is to control quality of waste disposed in the environment, particularly BOD, COD, TSS and pH parameters, so as not to exceed the existing quality standards. 5. The methods of environmental monitoring consist of: (i) Data collection and analysis method: data collection, types of equipment and instruments to be used, level of accuracy of instruments, formulae used in data analysis; (ii) Location of environmental monitoring; a precise location has to be determined to be accompanied by map with appropriate scale; (iii) Duration and frequency of monitoring: duration or period of monitoring (for example one year) with the frequency per time unit (twice a year, each once in the rainy season and dry season). 6. Environmental monitoring institutions: indicate in the plan the relevant institutions dealing with, interested in and relating to environmental monitoring activities, and should consist of:
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 56 ICWRMP EARF
(i) Implementor of the environmental monitoring plan: the responsible institution and fund donor in monitoring activity, namely the project initiator; (ii) Environmental monitoring supervisor: Agency or agencies tasked as environmental monitoring supervisors. Environmental monitoring supervision can be implemented by more than one agency; (iii) Reporting of environmental monitoring results: agencies receiving regular reports on monitoring results in accordance with their respective tasks.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 57 ICWRMP EARF
REFERENCES
ADB. Environmental Safeguards: Evaluation Study, Operations Evaluation Department, September 2006.
ADB. Environmental Assessment Guidelines, 2003.
Badan Pengendalian Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (BPLHD), Western Java Province Environmental Strategy, Western Java Environmental Management Project.
Bird, Jeremy. Institutional Assessment and Proposed Arrangements for ICWRMP, Discussion Note, PPTA Phase 3, September 2006.
Ministry of Environment Republic of Indonesia, Decree of State Minister for the Environment Number : 17 of 2001 on Types of Business and/or Activity Plans that are Required to be Completed with the Environmental Impact Assessment.
Ministry of Environment Republic of Indonesia, Decree of State Minister for the Environment Number : 2 of 2000 on Guidelines for AMDAL Document Evaluation.
Ministry of Environment Republic of Indonesia, Decree of State Minister for the Environment Number : 08 of 2000 on Community Involvement Openness in the Process of Environmental Impact Assessment.
Ministry of Environment Republic of Indonesia, Decree of State Minister for the Environment Number : 09 of 2000 on Guidelines for Preparation of Environmental Impacts Assessment Study.
Ministry of Environment Republic of Indonesia, Decree of State Minister for the Environment Number : 40 of 2000 on Guidelines for Work System of Evaluator Committee for Environmental Impact Assessment.
Ministry of Environment Republic of Indonesia, Decree of State Minister for the Environment Number : 41 of 2000 on Guidelines for Establishment of Regencial / Municipal Evaluator Committee for Environmental Impact Assessment.
Nippon Koie Co., Ltd. Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Project, Draft Final Report (including annexes), March 2006.
Nippon Koie Co., Ltd. Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Project—Strategic Environmental Assessment, Consultant’s Report, October 2006.
Nippon Koie Co., Ltd. Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Project—Initial Environmental Impact Assessment of Tranche 1, Consultant’s Report, October 2006.
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. and Associates 58 ICWRMP EARF
Supplementary Appendix 3 - ADB’s Anticorruption Policy
ADB’s Anticorruption Policy 2 July 1998 24 Anticorruption and Integrity
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
BPMSD Budget, Personnel and Management Systems Department
COSO Central Operations Services Office
DMC developing member country
GDP gross domestic product
IMF International Monetary Fund
MDB multilateral development bank
NGO nongovernment organization
OAS Organization of American States
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OGA Office of the General Auditor
OGC Office of the General Counsel
SPD Strategy and Policy Department
TA technical assistance
NOTE Since the document was prepared, the Offfice of the General Auditor has become the Office of the Auditor General.
In this report, “$” refers to US dollars.
This document has been edited for publication. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 25
I. INTRODUCTION
1. The problem of corruption, here defined as the misuse of public or private office for personal gain, has been one of the most enduring dilemmas confronting governments throughout history. Although differences may exist in the nature and scope of corrupt behavior, and the extent to which anticorruption measures are enforced, the phenomenon can be found at all times and within virtually every political system. It can also be found within the private sector. Indeed, the linkage between public and private sector corruption is an area of particular concern for both developed and developing countries in the Asia and Pacific region.
2. Historically, concern about corruption has tended to run in cycles, in which revelations of official abuses prompted anticorruption campaigns and administrative countermeasures that subsequently faded from view until the next round of scandals provided further impetus for reform. The desire to reduce or eliminate corruption was at the core of many enduring innovations for good governance. The major public administration reforms of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries— such as the introduction of a meritocratic civil service system, and professional management of government ministries and departments, or the creation of more formalized budget, procurement, and audit processes and agencies—had their roots in the desire to avoid earlier abuses of graft and political patronage.
3. Recently, the effort to combat corruption has moved to the center of the debate about good governance and economic growth. The impetus behind this move has come from many sources. On the donor side, the end of the Cold War has reduced the willingness of countries providing aid to overlook financial improprieties in light of broader geopolitical interests. Donor fatigue has placed increasing pressure upon foreign assistance agencies to demonstrate that they are delivering maximum value for the money. Many multinational corporations have come to believe their interests are better served by open and transparent competition. At the extremes, the negative example of a handful of “kleptocratic” regimes has underscored the danger of political and social collapse if widespread corruption is allowed to fester unchecked.
4. On the recipient side, in countries throughout the Asia and Pacific region, the citizenry has served notice that it is no longer willing to tolerate gross abuses of the public trust for private gain. The liberalization of the press in many parts of the world has enabled journalists to write more freely about official indiscretions. Improvements in education and increased information flow between countries have made their public more aware of anticorruption efforts in other countries and less willing to tolerate systematic abuses at home. The rise of new global nongovernment organizations (NGOs) dedicated to fighting corruption has helped bring and keep the issue in the spotlight in both the developed and the developing world.
5. Many of these dynamics are likely to exist for at least the next decade or more, resulting in a fundamental change in the context within which multilateral development banks (MDBs) operate. Pressure for more active measures against graft and corruption is no longer likely to be isolated and sporadic. Like questions relating to the environment or women in development, influential and well- connected constituencies both within and outside of the MDB community will press hard to ensure that issues of corruption and good governance remain an important and ongoing element of the development debate. 26 Anticorruption and Integrity
6. In response to these pressures, many international organizations are adopting more robust anticorruption measures:
(i) At a Summit of the Americas in May 1994, the Organization of American States (OAS) pledged to outlaw cross-border bribery and the “illicit enrichment” of officials in the hemisphere. In March 1996, 21 member states of OAS signed the Caracas Convention, which calls for energetic collective action in four principal areas: preventative measures and international cooperation, transnational bribery, illicit enrichment, and extradition. The Caracas Convention is now in force between the countries that have ratified it: Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Venezuela. (ii) The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Ministerial Council approved a resolution encouraging its member states to end the tax deductibility of foreign bribes and commissions for their multinational corporations in May 1996. A year later, it approved a full set of recommendations for criminalizing transnational bribery, enacting stricter accounting requirements and external and internal audit controls, tighter public procurement, and enhanced international controls. In December 1997, OECD ratified a convention making the bribery of foreign officials a criminal offense, on a par with the bribery of local government officials in the country where the corporation is based. (iii) The International Chamber of Commerce recently approved revised rules of conduct that prohibit bribes and recommended that its member associations around the globe, and their member corporations, adopt and apply these tighter rules. (iv) In December 1996, the United Nations General Assembly passed the Declaration Against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions.
7. One of the most forceful proponents of a tough stance on anticorruption issues is the World Bank’s President, James Wolfensohn. At the annual meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in October 1996, Wolfensohn characterized corruption as a “cancer” on the global economy and emphasized that it was time to “put teeth” into the World Bank’s efforts to address it. The Managing Director of IMF, Michel Camdessus, was equally blunt, noting that IMF officials will henceforth regard it as their duty to press for anticorruption reforms in countries seeking to borrow money. In the wake of the annual meetings, a working group was established under the Development Economics Vice Presidency of the World Bank to develop an integrated anticorruption strategy. The final report, along with accompanying staff guidelines, was endorsed by the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors on 2 September 1997.
8. The World Bank’s approach envisions a balanced strategy to combat corruption resting upon four pillars: (i) preventing fraud and corruption in World Bank-financed projects; (ii) helping countries that request World Bank support in their efforts to reduce corruption; (iii) taking corruption more explicitly into account in country assistance strategies, policy dialogue, analytical work, and the choice and design of projects; and (iv) adding voice and support to international efforts to reduce corruption.1
1 See World Bank. 1997. Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank, Washington DC. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 27
9. In August, IMF took the unprecedented step of suspending the second tranche of an Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility when one of its member countries failed to demonstrate that it was pursuing adequate measures to reduce the problem of corruption. The World Bank has strongly supported IMF’s move and warned that its own lending will be “substantially reduced” failing decisive action on the part of that government.2 At the annual meetings of the World Bank and IMF in Hong Kong, China in September 1997, the commitment of both institutions to combat corruption was strongly reaffirmed.
10. The 1997 summit of the Group of Seven industrial nations in Denver, United States, placed particular emphasis upon the role of the MDBs in combating corruption. The communique from the preliminary meeting of finance ministers and central bankers in April maintained, “in view of the corrosive effects of bribery and corruption generally on the achievement of sustainable economic development, growth, and stability, we welcome the increased attention to these problems on behalf of international financial institutions and the OECD.” In June, the final summit statement urged IMF and the MDBs to strengthen their activities to help countries fight corruption, including measures to ensure the rule of law, improve the efficiency and accountability of the public sector, and increase institutional capacity and efficiency. The international financial institutions were also encouraged to promote good governance in their respective areas of competence and to collaborate fully with the World Bank’s effort to establish procurement guidelines that meet the highest standards for transparency and rigor.
11. Many of the developing member countries (DMCs) of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) have played an integral role in the growing anticorruption movement. In East Asia, several countries that have enjoyed high growth rates in the past have expressed concern that perceptions of corruption can hamper their ability to attract future investment. In 1995, the People’s Republic of China passed legislation requiring leading Communist Party cadre levels above the country level to declare their income. Thailand’s Prime Minister pledged in January 1997 to clean up the Customs Department, which was creating numerous “hidden costs” for foreigners seeking to do business in Thailand. That same month, the President of the Philippines characterized “the nightmare of corruption in public service” as one of the country’s most persistent afflictions and ordered all government departments to submit monthly progress reports on their fight against corruption within their offices.
12. On the South Asian subcontinent, the problem of corruption has become one of the most pressing issues confronting government leaders today. In Pakistan, the Prime Minister has made the effort to clean up government one of the key goals of his new administration. India’s President recently characterized corruption as one of the greatest challenges now confronting his country. 3
2 Cited in Oxford Analytica. 1997. Asia Pacific Daily Brief, 14 August. Other problems cited by IMF include the failure to prosecute the perpetrators of a multimillion dollar financial fraud; irregularities surrounding the award of contracts for two power projects; and the use of extrabudgetary funds to purchase a presidential jet and build an international airport in the president’s hometown. 3 K.R. Narayanan. 1997. “Next an India for All, Tolerant and Uncorrupt,” editorial, International Herald Tribune, 13 August. 28 Anticorruption and Integrity
II. ADB’S RESPONSE
13. As a major multilateral development institution and one of the leading sources of development funding in Asia, ADB welcomes this emphasis on combating corruption as part of its broader work on issues of governance and capacity building. ADB’s Board paper, Governance: Sound Development Management, recognizes the importance of accountability for public officials, and transparency and predictability in government operations–critical principles in the fight against corruption.4 The policy’s emphasis upon strengthening the essential prerequisites for effective public administration is designed to ensure that the fundamental building blocks for transparent, predictable, and accountable administration are in place. These building blocks include an appropriate legal framework and effective enforcement mechanisms; a professional, competent, motivated, and meritocratic civil service; transparent procurement practices; effective internal control systems; and a well-functioning independent audit office. Participation, the fourth major principle in the ADB’s governance policy, is also of relevance. The experience of Hong Kong, China, and Singapore demonstrates that public support is a critical asset in the long-term struggle against official malfeasance.
14. At the broadest level, ADB’s stance on anticorruption issues is intended to reduce the burden that widespread, systemic corruption exacts upon the governments and economies of the region. More specifically, ADB’s approach is centered upon three objectives:
(i) supporting competitive markets and efficient, effective, accountable, and transparent public administration as part of ADB’s broader work on good governance and capacity building; (ii) supporting promising anticorruption efforts on a case-by-case basis and improving the quality of our dialogue with the DMCs on a range of governance issues, including corruption; and (iii) ensuring that ADB projects and staff adhere to the highest ethical standards.
15. The third and fourth sections will set the stage for the discussion of these objectives by addressing the definitional questions that have surrounded the topic and the costs that corruption imposes upon development. The remainder of the paper will consider the nature of ADB’s response. The fifth section outlines ADB’s position on anticorruption issues and describes the current ADB programs with significant anticorruption components. It also highlights the implications of the ADB’s anticorruption policy for current ADB operations. The last section concludes by highlighting specific next steps for ADB to take in implementing this policy.
4 R151-95: Governance: Sound Development Management, 17 August. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 29
III. DEFINITIONS OF CORRUPTION
16. The term “corruption” is used as a shorthand reference for a large range of illicit or illegal activities. Although there is no universal or comprehensive definition as to what constitutes corrupt behavior, the most prominent definitions share a common emphasis upon the abuse of public power or position for personal advantage. The Oxford Unabridged Dictionary defines corruption as “perversion or destruction of integrity in the discharge of public duties by bribery or favor.” The Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines it as “inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means (as bribery).” The succinct definition utilized by the World Bank is “the abuse of public office for private gain.” This definition is similar to that employed by Transparency International (TI), the leading NGO in the global anticorruption effort:
“Corruption involves behavior on the part of officials in the public sector, whether politicians or civil servants, in which they improperly and unlawfully enrich themselves, or those close to them, by the misuse of the public power entrusted to them.”5
17. These definitions are useful but, in the ADB’s judgment, they do not give adequate attention to the problem of corruption in the private sector or to the role of the private sector in fostering corruption in the public sector. As a shorthand definition, ADB defines corruption as “the abuse of public or private office for personal gain.” A more comprehensive definition is as follows:
Corruption involves behavior on the part of officials in the public and private sectors, in which they improperly and unlawfully enrich themselves and/or those close to them, or induce others to do so, by misusing the position in which they are placed.
18. A list of illicit behavior typically referred to as “corruption” is presented in Box 1. This catalogue is not exhaustive and is intended to illustrate the areas of greatest interest and concern to ADB. Some types of corruption are internal, in that they interfere with the ability of a government agency to recruit or manage its staff, make efficient use of its resources, or conduct impartial in-house investigations. Others are external, in that they involve efforts to manipulate or extort money from clients or suppliers, or to benefit from inside information. Still others involve unwarranted interference in market operations, such as the use of state power to artificially restrict competition and generate monopoly rents.
19. More narrow definitions of corruption are often necessary to address particular types of illicit behavior. In the area of procurement fraud, for example, the World Bank defines corrupt practice as “the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any thing of value to influence the action of a public official in the procurement process or in contract execution.” Fraudulent practice is defined as “a misrepresentation of facts in or to influence a procurement process or the execution of a contract to the detriment of the Borrower, and includes collusive practices among bidders ... designed to
5 See World Bank 1997, p. 8. See also Transparency International. 1996. The TI Sourcebook, edited by Jeremy Pope. Berlin: TI, p.1. The World Bank definition includes the activities of private agents who subvert public policies and processes for competitive advantage. 30 Anticorruption and Integrity
establish bid prices at artificial, noncompetitive levels and to deprive the Borrower of the benefits of free and open competition.”6
20. It is often useful to differentiate between grand corruption, which typically involves senior officials, major decisions or contracts, and the exchange of large sums of money; and petty corruption, which involves low-level officials, the provision of routine services and goods, and small sums of money. It is also useful to differentiate between systemic corruption, which permeates an entire government or ministry; and individual corrup- tion, which is more isolated and sporadic. Finally, it is useful to distinguish between syndi- cated corruption in which elaborate systems are devised for receiving and disseminating bribes, and nonsyndicated corruption, in which individual officials may seek or compete for bribes in an ad hoc and uncoordinated fashion.
Box 1. An illustrative list of corrupt behaviors
The design or selection of uneconomical projects because of opportunities for financial kickbacks and political patronage. Procurement fraud, including collusion, overcharging, or the selection of contractors, suppliers, and consultants on criteria other than the lowest evaluated substantially responsive bidder. Illicit payments of "speed money" to government officials to facilitate the timely delivery of goods and services to which the public is rightfully entitled, such as permits and licenses. Illicit payments to government officials to facilitate access to goods, services, and/or information to which the public is not entitled, or to deny the public access to goods and services to which it is legally entitled. Illicit payments to prevent the application of rules and regulations in a fair and consistent manner, particularly in areas concerning public safety, law enforcement, or revenue collection. Payments to government officials to foster or sustain monopolistic or oligopolistic access to markets in the absence of a compelling economic rationale for such restrictions. The misappropriation of confidential information for personal gain, such as using knowledge about public transportation routings to invest in real estate that is likely to appreciate. The deliberate disclosure of false or misleading information on the financial status of corporations that would prevent potential investors from accurately valuing their worth, such as the failure to disclose large contingent liabilities or the undervaluing of assets in enterprises slated for privatiza- tion. The theft or embezzlement of public property and monies. The sale of official posts, positions, or promotions; nepotism; or other actions that undermine the creation of a professional, meritocratic civil service. Extortion and the abuse of public office, such as using the threat of a tax audit or legal sanctions to extract personal favors. Obstruction of justice and interference in the duties of agencies tasked with detecting, investigating, and prosecuting illicit behavior.
6 In the movement to harmonize ADB procurement standards with those of the World Bank on the topic of corruption, these definitions may also be adopted by ADB. See the last section of this paper. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 31
IV. THE COSTS OF CORRUPTION
21. Corruption has not always been perceived as having a negative impact upon development. In earlier decades, arguments were advanced that it could have beneficial effects. In countries where public sector wages are often low and in some cases may not even be enough to live on, some maintained that it was natural for civil servants to augment their salaries by other means. It was alleged that corruption could advance economic efficiency by helping restore artificial and administratively determined prices to market-clearing levels. Others maintained that corruption played a useful redistributive role, transferring resources from wealthy individuals and corporations to those of more modest means, or that it could serve as a tool of national integration by allowing ruling elites to entice or co-opt fractious political, ethnic, or religious groups. Finally, some scholars have argued that corruption is a natural stage of development. They note that it was generally widespread in many advanced countries until recently, when it was reduced (but not eliminated) through the gradual imposition of public sector reforms over the last century.
22. Robert Klitgaard, one of the most astute students of the problem of corruption in development, notes that these arguments have several common features.7 First, they often refer to the benefits stemming from specific illicit acts and do not consider the systemic impact of corruption. Although a given incident or transaction may have positive results, it may also generate negative externalities that degrade the performance of the system as a whole and compromise the economy’s long-term dynamic efficiency.
23. Second, many of the alleged benefits from corruption, such as streamlining government transactions or enhancing civil service pay, only appear as such against the background of a public sector that is failing to perform effectively. The experience of economies such as Singapore indicates that patient and persistent efforts toward improved public sector management, by streamlining customs procedures or by paying wages that are competitive with the private sector, for example, are likely to result in greater benefits over time than tolerating relatively high levels of corruption to compensate for these deficiencies.
24. Third, corruption encourages people to avoid both good regulations and bad. There is no guarantee that an importer who bribes a customs official to expedite the clearance of badly needed medication one week will not bribe the official to expedite the clearance of illegal narcotics the next.
25. The task of evaluating the practical impact of corruption upon a country’s development is a complicated one that is now being subject to increasing scholarly attention. Although there are instances when illicit acts can improve the economic rates of return, the bulk of the evidence indicates that corrupt actions typically generate far more costs than benefits. A study of corruption in one African country, for example, concluded that corruption intensified ethnic conflict, ruined the efficiency of municipal government and federal agencies, crippled the merit system of hiring and promotion, and generated an “atmosphere of distrust which pervades all levels of administration.” A study of an
7 Robert Klitgaard. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, p. 32. 32 Anticorruption and Integrity
Asian country found that in none of the cases under consideration was the money raised through corruption “directly and productively invested.”8 An extensive study of corruption in another Asian country concluded:
Graft and corruption has strongly affected development efforts negatively, belying the so-called “revisionist hypothesis” prevalent in the West which considers corruption as either a necessary step in the development process or a means of speeding it up. Instead [our research] found that corruption leads to the favoring of inefficient producers, the unfair and inequitable distribution of scarce public resources, and the leakage of revenue from government coffers to private hands. Less directly, but no less perniciously, corruption leads to loss of confidence in government.9
26. Upon closer inspection, many of corruption’s alleged distributive, efficiency, and political benefits turn out to be illusory. Rather than enhancing a more equitable distribution of income, corruption distorts the allocation of social resources away from those who are legally entitled to them and toward the rich, the powerful, and the politically well connected. Rather than compensating civil servants for poor pay, corruption undermines the merit system and compromises service professionalism and esprit de corps. At times, it can even foster additional inefficiencies within the public sector.10 Instead of cementing political loyalties, corruption more often breeds public cynicism and resentment toward the political process and those associated with it.
27. Many studies of the cost of corruption in individual cases paint a disturbing picture of resources lost, squandered, or devoted to suboptimal uses:
(i) Some estimates calculate that as much as $30 billion in aid for Africa has ended up in foreign bank accounts. This amount is twice the annual gross domestic product (GDP) of Ghana, Kenya, and Uganda combined.11 (ii) Over the last 20 years, one East Asian country is estimated to have lost $48 billion due to corruption, surpassing its entire foreign debt of $40.6 billion.12 (iii) An internal report of another Asian government found that over the past decade, state assets have fallen by more than $50 billion, primarily because corrupt officials have deliberately undervalued them in trading off big property stakes to private interests or to international investors in return for payoffs.13
8 The African citation is from Herbert Werlin. 1979. “The Consequences of Corruption: The Ghanaian Experience,” in Monday U. Ekpo, ed. Bureaucratic Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa: Toward a Search for Causes and Consequences. Washington DC: University Press of America, p. 253. The second citation is from Kang Sintaek. 1978. “Conclusions and Recommendations,” in a paper prepared for the Fourth Working Meeting on Bureaucratic Behavior and Development, Hong Kong, China, August, cited in Klitgaard. 1988. p. 37. 9 Ledivina V.Carino and Josie H. de Leon. 1983. Final Report for the Study of Graft and Corruption, Red Tape and Inefficiency in Government, cited in Klitgaard. 1988. p. 38. 10 In one African country, for example, each imported container shipment is inspected three times by custom officers because of the opportunity for graft and speed payments, rather than conducting a spot check based upon the previous history of the importer, as is the practice in many other countries. 11 Michelle Celarier. 1996. “The Search for the Smoking Gun,” Euromoney (September): 49. 12 Philippine Government estimate, cited from Reuter Newswire. 1997. “Philippines Corruption a ‘Nightmare’ -Ramos,” 11 January. See also Philippine Star. 1997. “Commission on Audit: P1.2 B Lost to Graft Each Year,” 12 June. 13 Internal report, cited from Business Week. 1993. “The Destructive Costs of Greasing Palms,” 6 December, p.133. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 33
(iv) In one South Asian country, recent government reports indicate that $50 million daily is misappropriated due to mismanagement and corruption. The Prime Minister stated publicly recently that the majority of bureaucrats and the administrative machinery from top to bottom are corrupt.14 (v) In one North American city, businesses were able to cut $330 million from an annual waste disposal bill of $1.5 billion by ridding the garbage industry of Mafia domination. A particular problem was the permeation of regulatory bodies by organized crime.15 (vi) Studies of the impact of corruption upon government procurement policies in several Asian countries reveal that these governments have paid from 20% to 100% more for goods and services than they would have otherwise.16 (vii) Corruption can cost many governments as much as 50% of their tax revenues. When customs officials in a Latin American country were allowed to receive a percentage of what they collected, there was a 60% increase in customs revenues within 1 year.17 (viii) Some estimates of the role of corruption in a European country concluded that it has inflated this country’s total outstanding government debt by as much as 15% or $200 billion. In one city, anticorruption initiatives have reduced the cost of infrastructure outlays by 35-40%, allowing the city to significantly increase its outlays for the mainte- nance of schools, roads, street lamps, and social services.18
28. Although almost impossible to value accurately, the indirect costs of corruption can often dwarf its direct costs. Scarce resources are squandered on uneconomical projects because of their potential to generate lucrative payoffs, and priority sectors such as education or health suffer disproportionately. Legitimate entrepreneurial activity is hindered or suppressed. Public safety is endangered by substandard products and construction. Capital is redirected toward more transparent and predictable investment sites. Individuals who would not otherwise engage in illicit behavior decide they have no alternative, and intellectual energy is diverted from more productive pursuits to figuring out ways to “get around the system.” In extreme cases, the legitimacy of the public sector itself is called into question, and governments may be confronted with political instability or collapse.
29. Although corruption is costly, its impact upon development is not uniform. Some countries can tolerate relatively high levels of bribery and graft and continue to maintain respectable rates of economic growth, whereas others cannot. Several factors influence the extent to which corruption serves as a brake upon the process of development. At the most basic level, a state’s natural resource base and the sources of its comparative advantage play a critical role in its ability to attract investment.19 A second factor is the form in which corruption is practiced. In some countries, corruption is highly routinized. Payoffs are generally known in advance and concentrated at the top
14 The News. 1997. 28 March. 15 The Financial Times. 1997. 6 June. 16 Thinapan Nakata. 1978. “Corruption in the Thai Bureaucracy. Who Gets What, How and Why in Its Public Expenditures.” Thai Journal of Public Administration 18 (January): 120–128; Clive Gray. 1979. “Civil Service Compensation in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 15 (March): 85–113; and Robert Wade. 1982. “The System of Administrative and Political Corruption: Canal Irrigation in India.” Journal of Development Studies 18 (April): 287–328. Cited in Klitgaard. 1988. pp. 39–40. 17 Business Week. 1993. “The Destructive Costs of Greasing Palms.” 6 December, pp. 134–135. 18 Business Week. 1993. “The Destructive Costs of Greasing Palms.” 6 December, p. 135. 19 States with rare or valuable natural resources can generally attract more investment than those seeking to compete as a source of low wage, labor-intensive manufacturing. Ironically, such resource-rich countries also often enjoy lower growth rates than their poorer counterparts. See Philip R. Lane and Aaron Tornell. 1996. “Power, Growth and the Voracity Effect.” Journal of Economic Growth, 1 (June): 213–241. 34 Anticorruption and Integrity
in a “one-stop” fashion. Such an approach may reduce transaction costs and add a measure of predictability to investment decisions, making the country inherently more attractive than others where many different officials can demand unspecified and unanticipated payments. Finally, the extent to which money remains in the country and is invested in productive economic activity, or flows abroad into foreign bank accounts, will also have an impact upon a nation’s ability to tolerate relatively high levels of corruption and still enjoy decent rates of economic growth.
30. In spite of these caveats, the most recent and innovative empirical research demonstrates that- -even correcting for variables such as bureaucratic efficiency—countries that tolerate relatively high levels of corruption are unlikely to perform as well economically as they would have otherwise. In a study of over 70 countries during the late 1970s and early 1980s, IMF economist Paolo Mauro found that corruption “is strongly negatively associated with the investment rate, regardless of the amount of red tape.” Mauro’s model indicates that a one standard deviation improvement in the “corruption index” will translate into an increase of 2.9% of GDP in the investment rate and a 1.3% increase in the annual per capita rate of GDP growth.20
31. This analysis is supported by other recent studies. Using data from 39 industrial and developing countries that controlled for income, education, and policy distortion, two World Bank researchers found that countries that were perceived to have relatively low levels of corruption were always able to attract significantly more investment than those perceived to be more prone to corrupt or illicit activity. This result held true for both countries where corruption was highly syndicated and predictable, and countries where it was not.21 Another recent study, which utilized econometric analysis to examine the impact of corruption upon foreign direct investment in East Asia, found that perceptions of corruption had a strong and negative impact upon the flow of foreign investment. According to the study’s findings, East Asia is no different from any other region in this regard.22
20 Paolo Mauro. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. (August): 681–711. The citations are from pages 695 and 683, respectively. It should be noted that many of these cross-country econometric studies are based on levels of perceived (versus actual) corruption, and that such studies can have problems in desegregating corruption’s effects from those of other variables related to the quality of governance. 21 The analysis was conducted by Jose Eduardo Campos and Sanjay Pradhan in conjunction with the 1997 World Development Report. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 102–109. 22 Shang-Jin Wei. 1997. “How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors.” Working Paper 6030, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 35
V. ADB’S POSITION ON ANTICORRUPTION ISSUES
32. In light of the discussion above, ADB affirms that corrupt and illicit behavior is a serious brake upon the development process. ADB rejects the argument that corruption’s beneficial effects outweigh its negative consequences, or that it is inappropriate for international financial institutions to address such issues. ADB notes that experience drawn from the Asia and Pacific region and elsewhere demonstrates that significant progress can be made in the struggle against corruption if the proper legal, institutional, and policy reforms are in place. ADB welcomes the growing focus upon anticor- ruption issues as part of its broader effort to advance the principles of transparency, predictability, accountability, and participation under its governance policy.
33. At the broadest level, ADB’s stance on anticorruption issues is intended to reduce the burden that widespread, systemic corruption exacts upon the economies of the region and the development of ADB’s DMCs. In keeping with Article 36(2) of the Charter, ADB initiatives regarding corruption will be grounded solely upon economic considerations and concerns of sound development management. They will not involve interference in the political affairs of a DMC or be influenced by its political character.
34. More specifically, ADB’s approach is centered upon three basic objectives:
(i) supporting competitive markets and efficient, effective, accountable, and transparent public administration as part of ADB’s broader work on good governance and capacity building; (ii) supporting promising anticorruption efforts on a case-by-case basis and improving the quality of our dialogue with the DMCs on a range of governance issues, including corruption; and (iii) ensuring that ADB projects and staff adhere to the highest financial and ethical standards.
Objective no. 1: Supporting competitive markets and efficient, effective, accountable, and transparent public administration
35. As a matter of policy, the major thrust of the Bank’s anticorruption effort will address this problem as a part of its broader work on governance and capacity building. ADB’s approach seeks to be proactive and to place a premium upon continuous efforts to upgrade the efficiency of markets and the quality of the public sector as a whole. This focus upon prevention over prosecution reflects the belief that most priority governance initiatives have significant positive externalities in the struggle against corruption. Long-term success is more likely to come through patient and persistent economic, legal, and institutional reforms rather than short-term and largely reactive efforts to punish wrongdoers.23
23 The detection and prosecution of illicit activities has been an important part of successful anticorruption efforts. However, the most effective approaches have combined efforts toward prosecution with an even stronger emphasis upon prevention. ADB’s own experience and comparative advantage fall strongly on the side of prevention. 36 Anticorruption and Integrity
36. There are two priority areas where ADB will concentrate its broader governance effort: policy dialogue directed toward economic liberalization and public administration reform. Regarding the former, ADB can use its dialogue with the DMCs to advance policy recommendations that will help eliminate market distortions and reduce opportunities for rent seeking on the part of firms or officials. The liberalization of licensing regimes, the opening up of access to foreign exchange markets, the reduction of administered prices, the expansion of credit opportunities for small farmers and businesspeople, the removal of subsidies and soft loans to favored companies, and the introduction of a clear distinction between production and regulatory functions are all ways in which policy changes can level the playing field and reduce opportunities for corrupt or illicit behavior. ADB is already pursuing many of these initiatives in its dialogue with the DMCs (Box 2).
Box 2. Examples of ADB loans and grants supporting market liberalization and policy reforms
Loan 1444 and TA 2587: Kyrgyz Road Rehabilitation Project and Institutional Strengthening of the Road Sector: In June 1996, the Board approved a loan for $50 million to the Kyrgyz Republic for road rehabilita- tion. A component of this project and its associated technical assistance (TA) were designed to open the transport sector to competition, so that customers are free to choose between competing alternatives on the basis of price and quality of service, and there is no government discrimination (through regulations, price controls, discriminatory licensing practices, or other interventions) between government-owned and private operators of transport services.
Loan 1506: Gujarat Public Sector Resource Management Program: In December 1996, the Board approved a loan of $250 million and an additional TA grant to the Indian state of Gujarat to improve the quality of its public sector management, to support the disinvestment of selected state enterprises, and to improve its infrastructure. A critical objective of the Bank’s policy dialogue was to reverse the impact of past policies and regulations that discriminated against private sector participation in infrastructure, including a lack of transparency of the decision-making system; the absence of regulations governing entry, evaluation of bids, and tenders; problems related to pricing and regulatory issues in monopolistic conditions; and weak- ness of the legal system, dispute resolution, and arbitration. The goal was to reduce the involvement of the public sector in the direct provision of certain goods and services, while reorienting and strengthening its regulatory role in ensuring a level playing field for public-private sector operations.
37. There are several ways in which the ADB’s work in enterprise reform and financial markets development, along with its private sector operations, is contributing to increased competitiveness, transparency, and accountability. ADB is supporting a range of policy-based reforms in many countries that are intended to amend banking regulations to allow greater competition and to reduce directed lending while strengthening the capacity of regulatory agencies. This is also true in the area of capital markets, where ADB is seeking to enhance disclosure practices and improve market surveillance. Through its private sector operations, ADB invests in catalytic projects such as ratings agencies, which provide transparency in the capital market by publishing independent judgments on the investment quality of debt instruments, thus helping investors make informed investment decisions. ADB is also becoming increasingly involved in strengthening corporate governance in the private companies and investment funds where it has an equity interest. In the wake of the financial crisis that has affected many countries in the Asian and Pacific region, these efforts are being rapidly expanded. ADB is also considering providing support for new initiatives in areas such as money laundering. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 37
38. Particular care must be taken in dealing with issues of privatization. There are often powerful financial and economic rationales for the state divesting from activities where it has little comparative advantage. Preliminary research also indicates that, when done properly, privatization can also help lower the level of corruption.24 However, in many countries the privatization process has often been fraught with allegations of bribery, theft, and embezzlement. To avoid this problem, it is critical that transparent, unbiased, and fully contestable procedures be utilized in the sale of state assets. When the sale involves a natural monopoly, it is also important that capable, independent regulatory agencies be established to provide adequate oversight prior to privatization. Issues of best practice involving corporate governance will also be an important component of ADB loans and TA grants addressing issues of privatization, corporatization, and public enterprise management.
39. Many basic public administration reforms during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries came about in response to official malfeasance. By focusing as a first priority upon comprehensive public sector reform, ADB can help its DMCs effect changes that will make corrupt behavior more difficult to engage in and more readily detected once it occurs. A breakdown of broader reform initiatives with significant anticorruption components is presented in Appendix 1.
40. Turning first to the executive branch, there are several priority areas where efforts to upgrade the quality of a country’s public administration will pay significant dividends in the struggle against corruption. Efforts to strengthen information systems, particularly those relating to financial management, should enhance transparency and accountability, and strengthen the capacity of governments to monitor their expenditures. Measures to strengthen internal audit functions and to ensure adequate control over disbursements can play the dual role of helping monitor and improve performance while making theft and embezzlement more easily detected. Procurement reform, which ADB is already pursuing in a number of DMCs, can reduce costs while simultaneously making it more difficult to perpetrate fraud and abuse.
41. Another area where significant progress can be made is civil service reform. As ADB’s Board paper, Governance: Sound Development Management notes, the cumulative effect of poor salaries, low morale and productivity, uncertain prospects for career development, and insufficient linkage of merit to promotion can foster pervasive corruption among public officials.
42. ADB can support a number of initiatives to redress these problems. Measures to strengthen establishment management and control for civil service positions will help ensure that there are no “ghost employees” on the payroll. Efforts to decompress pay scales and improve employment condi- tions throughout the civil service will lower the incentive for illicit behavior. Initiatives to reduce the number of exemptions and special allowances will make remuneration more transparent. Measures to improve procedures for recruitment and promotion should help avoid abuses of patronage, nepo- tism, and favoritism, and help to foster the creation of an independent, meritocratic civil service. Efforts to draft and enforce a code of ethics will clarify what is expected of civil servants and ensure adherence to appropriate norms of behavior.
24 Daniel Kaufmann and Paul Siegelbaum. 1996. “Privatization and Corruption in Transition Economies.” Journal of Interna- tional Affairs 50 (2): 419–458. 38 Anticorruption and Integrity
43. Finally, one can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the public sector while simultaneously reducing opportunities for corruption by narrowing its scope for intervention. Within ministries, agencies, and departments, one of the best approaches is the re-engineering of business processes. As procedures are simplified and streamlined, the need for “speed money” payments to expedite services disappears. At a broader level, deregulation, commercialization, and privatization can, under appropriate circumstances, achieve similar objectives. As the sphere of state activity decreases, then as a general rule the opportunity for soliciting bribes will also go down.
44. Several “good governance” initiatives relating to the legislative and judicial branches can also help in the fight against corruption. One important means to enhance accountability is to strengthen the parliament’s oversight function and improve the capacity of parliamentary institutions, such as supreme audit agencies, to function effectively. Measures for legal and judicial reform, such as efforts to reduce judicial backlogs through alternate dispute resolution techniques, or to improve courtroom management to ensure cases can be tried in a timely fashion, or to enhance the independence and professionalism of the judiciary, will all have positive externalities in the struggle against corruption. The same is true for efforts to reduce critical skill gaps in areas such as accounting and audit.
45. These initiatives are noncontroversial and widely recognized to be the building blocks of solid public sector management. ADB is already pursuing a number of such initiatives within its existing portfolio of loans and TA grants (Box 3). They will serve as the core of the ADB’s anticorruption effort as part of its broader program for strengthening governance and capacity building.
Box 3. Examples of ADB loans and grants for good governance with anticorruption components
RETA 5688: Regional Long-Term Audit Training Program for Members of the Asian Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions: This initiative for $1.0 million was approved by the Board in June 1996. It envisions a 5-year program to strengthen regional training programs for supreme audit institutions and to upgrade the training and technical audit skills of individual audit institutions. TA 2186: Strengthening the Legal Framework for Customs Administration in the People’s Republic of China: This TA program for $646,000 was approved by the Board in October 1994. Its objectives were to assist the Customs General Administration (CGA) in (i) proposing new effective legislation and regulations relating to border control of international property rights, antidumping countervailing duties, anticommercial fraud measures, and external auditing; (ii) establishing a legal information system for customs legislation and regulations; and (iii) training for CGA staff in implementing these measures. TA 2616: Public Administration Reform in Sri Lanka: In July 1996, the President approved a grant of $275,000 to the Government of Sri Lanka to help reverse a lengthy decline in the quality and capability of the public sector. Two of the goals of this initiative were to rationalize public sector cadres and to enhance the accountability of government employees by introducing results-based management systems and procedures. Loan 1513: Support for the Public Sector Reform Program in the Republic of the Marshall Islands:In January 1997, the Board approved a loan of $12 million to support the implementation of a public sector reform program intended to stabilize the Government’s financial situation, improve the efficiency of its public sector, and enhance its ability to provide an enabling environment for private sector growth. Third tranche conditions in the loan place a premium upon making procedures for issuing business and foreign investment licenses more transparent and predictable. They also provide for the establishment of the Office of the Ombudsman to ensure the fair and independent arbitration of disputes between the Government and public at large. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 39
Objective no. 2: Supporting promising anticorruption efforts on a case-by-case basis and improving the quality of dialogue on governance issues
46. ADB may also be called upon to assist its DMCs in pursuing explicit anticorruption programs. Such assistance could include efforts to develop a national anticorruption strategy; improve the ability of the courts to try corruption cases; respond to requests from legislators and government officials for legal or TA in drafting anticorruption statutes or professional codes of conduct; strengthen the legal mechanisms for review of administrative action, e.g., the creation of an ombudsman or provision for judicial review; or improve the capacity of anticorruption agencies to detect or prosecute illicit behavior.
47. ADB will give careful consideration to any request from a DMC for assistance in developing an anticorruption effort. Since these activities are likely to be politically delicate and require detailed knowledge of the particular circumstances surrounding each case, ADB will provide staff with flexibility and discretion in pursuing such initiatives on a case-by-case basis. ADB assistance should be guided by three principles: (i) the assistance must be requested by the DMC government; (ii) the request must be consistent with ADB’s broader country operational strategy and ongoing efforts in the field of governance and capacity building; and (iii) the request should fall in an area where ADB has or can provide relevant expertise.
48. In a similar fashion, ADB will consider supporting regional anticorruption efforts; workshops, seminars, conferences, and training activities; research and publications dealing with anticorruption issues; and possible collaboration with local and international NGOs whose mission or work program advances such initiatives.
49. Staff should exercise caution in addressing several sets of initiatives that will typically remain beyond ADB’s scope of involvement. They include efforts to influence the domestic debate within its DMCs regarding a particular anticorruption strategy or set of anticorruption initiatives; anticorruption programs that are highly politicized and targeted at a particular individual or political party; and initiatives that are largely cosmetic in nature and designed to foster the illusion of progress without the substance. ADB should not provide assistance to any anticorruption measure unless there is an understanding with its DMC over the nature and scope of these initiatives and their importance within that country’s overall development strategy.
50. ADB has several mechanisms for engaging in dialogue with its DMCs on issues of governance (including corruption), ranging from the country operational strategy and the country assistance program discussions, to country portfolio review missions, to project appraisal, implementation, and review missions. ADB staff charged with country strategy and program formulation, including the drafting of the country strategy and program documents, as well as staff responsible for loan or TA projects, should address corruption in the context of broader governance and capacity-building issues. They should be knowledgeable about issues of corruption and its impact within their particular geographic and/or sectoral sphere of operations. They will use these mechanisms to discuss and recommend ways in which ADB can help advance the principles of sound development management, including measures that would help combat corruption, in any country where corruption affects ADB projects and the country’s general prospects for economic growth. 40 Anticorruption and Integrity
51. The country portfolio review missions and project review missions provide a useful venue for discussing the policies and practices that impede the efficient implementation of ADB projects. Under most circumstances, staff who suspect that corruption may have occurred or be occurring within a given ADB project should follow the procedures outlined in paragraph 64 and report the matter to the Office of the General Auditor (OGA), who will determine the optimal course of action. In rare cases where rapid follow-up actions may be needed, staff can address such issues explicitly with the relevant company, executing agency, or appropriate investigative agencies after clearance from their director and the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Any discussion with a given firm or government agency should, however, be limited to a specific ADB operation or set of operations.
52. Consistent with the ADB’s Media Guidelines, the President, vice-presidents, and heads of offices or departments can speak to the press about issues of corruption as they deem necessary in the conduct of ADB operations. Other ADB staff are free to discuss issues of corruption in general terms, provided they follow the procedures prescribed in the Media Guidelines. However, they should not speak to the press about either specific examples of corruption among ADB suppliers or in DMCs, or the general level of corruption within a company or nation without previously receiving clearance from the vice-president concerned or, in his or her absence, ADB’s chief information officer.
Objective no. 3: Ensuring ADB projects and staff adhere to the highest ethical standards
53. If ADB efforts to reduce illicit behavior between its DMCs and suppliers and contractors are to be credible, it is essential that ADB staff be beyond reproach, and the ADB’s internal regulations and procedures support the highest ethical standards. Toward this end, the third pillar of the ADB’s anti- corruption policy calls for more robust internal measures to enhance the integrity of ADB operations. These measures will take place along five dimensions: (i) maintaining the integrity of ADB lending and TA operations; (ii) strengthening the ADB’s procurement policy; (iii) updating the ADB’s Code of Conduct and creating independent internal reporting mechanisms to address allegations of corruption among ADB staff or within ADB operations; (iv) improving the quality of oversight and management of ADB loans and TA grants; and (v) ensuring that all ADB staff are familiar with the anticorruption policy and act in a manner consistent with both the letter and the spirit of this policy.
1. Maintaining the integrity of ADB lending and TA operations
54. If there is credible evidence of corruption in an ADB-financed loan or TA grant, ADB will address the issue in consultation with the relevant country during project review or country portfolio review missions. Breaches of specific loan regulations or covenants could result in a decision by Management to blacklist the firm involved, suspend disbursements, or cancel the loan.
55. In keeping with the evolving practice of IMF and the World Bank, Management and staff will consider issues of corruption more explicitly in the formulation of the country strategy and program. Cases may occur in which corruption has reached such proportions that it poses a significant impedi- ment to the probity of ADB operations or the attainment of a country’s fundamental development objectives. Under such circumstances, Management could elect to lower or suspend ADB lending and TA operations to that country after consultation with the country and the Board. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 41
56. Conversely, situations may also exist where a given country has made significant progress in improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and integrity of its public and private sectors. Under such circumstances, Management may elect to accelerate the lending program or provide additional TA resources to ensure sustainability of the reforms.
57. In light of the complex and highly differentiated nature of corruption, it is important that ADB Management and staff be granted some degree of flexibility in dealing with individual cases within the parameters laid out in this policy. While acknowledging the need for fairness and consistency in its operations, and strongly affirming the importance of a “zero tolerance” policy when credible evidence of corruption exists among ADB staff or projects, ADB notes that different types of corruption will require different responses. There is a need for careful judgment based on accurate information and the specifics of the situation. ADB’s anticorruption effort will place particular emphasis upon the implementation of practical and cost-effective prevention control measures, in a fashion consistent with the Charter principle of “economy and efficiency.”
2. Procurement reform
58. An Anticorruption Task Force chaired by the Central Operations Services Office (COSO) was recently convened to examine ADB procurement policy. The Task Force considered various anticorruption measures adopted by the World Bank in July 1996, in which it is required that borrowers, bidders, suppliers, and contractors “observe the highest standard of ethics” during the procurement and execution of contracts.25 In implementing this approach, the World Bank will
(i) reject a proposal for an award if it determines that the bidder recommended for the award has engaged in corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for the contract in question; (ii) cancel the portion of the loan allocated to a contract for goods or works if it at any time determines that corrupt or fraudulent practices were engaged in by representatives of the borrower or a beneficiary of the loan during the procurement or the execution of that contract, without the borrower having taken timely and appropriate action satisfactory to the World Bank to remedy the situation; (iii) declare a firm ineligible, either indefinitely or for a stated period, to be awarded a World Bank-financed contract if it at any time determines that the firm has engaged in corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for, or in executing, a World Bank-financed contract; and (iv) have the right to require that in contracts financed by a World Bank loan a provision be included requiring suppliers and contractors to permit the World Bank to inspect their accounts and records relating to the performance of the contract and to have them audited by auditors appointed by the World Bank.
25 R96-112/1 Proposed Amendments in the Bank’s Loan Documents for the Purpose of Making Them More Effective in the Fight Against Fraud and Corruption, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 23 July 1996. 42 Anticorruption and Integrity
59. Similar provisions were introduced in the World Bank’s Guidelines for Selection and Employment of Consultants. On 2 September 1997, the World Bank’s Board agreed to an amendment to procurement guidelines to accommodate a “no bribery pledge” in the bid form, which can be inserted into World Bank-financed projects at the request of the borrower and will obligate firms to observe local laws with respect to the bribing of government officials.
60. The Task Force considered these and other measures, which were discussed with Management. In line with the recommendation of the Group of Seven industrial nations, and having taken into account the advantages of harmonizing practice among the MDBs with regard to procurement and the engagement of consultants, ADB will introduce anticorruption provisions effectively identical to those adopted by the World Bank for the rejection of proposals, loan cancellation, declaration of ineligibility, and inspection rights, as set forth in the previous page. ADB will also introduce an optional “no bribery pledge” in the bid form that will be similar to that of the World Bank. Following the adoption of the anticorruption policy paper by the Board, changes to this effect will be incorporated in the ADB’s Guidelines for Procurement and the Guidelines on the Use of Consultants by the Asian Development Bank and its Borrowers and submitted to the Board for approval. The text for these changes is provided in Appendix 2. The guidelines will further be supplemented by provisions in the ADB’s Loan Regulations allowing ADB to cancel loans where there is evidence of corruption or fraud in connection with the award of a contract being financed by ADB.26 The text of these changes is provided in Appendix 3.
61. In addition to introducing these new measures, existing ADB guidelines will be applied more rigorously and systematically to ensure greater fairness and transparency in the procurement process. Particular attention will be devoted to eliminating delays and requests for extensions in the prequalification, bid evaluation, contract award, advance payment, project start-up, and progress payment phases. Greater effort will also be devoted to scrutinizing the number and scope of change orders, including the introduction of random audits, with the aim of ensuring the appropriateness of such requests. When the contract is to be financed wholly or partly by ADB, the contract documents shall include an undertaking by the contractor that no fees, gratuities, rebates, gifts, commissions or other payments, other than those shown in the bid, will be given or received in connection with the procurement process or in the contract execution.
62. With regard to the ADB’s private sector operations, procurement issues are most relevant in the financing of infrastructure projects. In a fashion consistent with the Working Paper, Review of Private Sector Operations, sponsors for infrastructure projects must have been selected by the host govern- ment in a transparent manner, preferably through competitive bidding. If it is a negotiated project, the engineering, procurement, and construction contract for the project must be competitively bid.
3. Updating code of conduct and creating independent internal reporting mechanisms
63. OGC, in consultation with the Budget, Personnel and Management Systems Department (BPMSD), drafted amendments of Section 4 of Administrative Order No. 2.02 to extend its scope to cover matters concerning business affiliations and private activities, financial interests, investments and trading activities, and the disclosure of financial and business interests. The purpose of these
26 OGC 1986. Ordinary Operations Loan Regulations. ADB, Manila. OGC. 1982. Special Operations Loan Regulations. ADB, Manila. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 43
amendments was to prevent the occurrence of a conflict, or the appearance of such a conflict, among staff members between their personal interests and their duties and responsibilities as staff members. On 28 May 1998, Management endorsed these changes, and Section 4 has now become a comprehensive Code of Conduct applicable to all staff members of ADB.
64. Additional measures are necessary to ensure that the ADB’s internal policies and procedures for addressing issues of corrupt or illicit behavior are consistent with those of the other MDBs and evolving best practice. Currently, there are no publicized independent channels whereby incidents of corruption can be reported for investigation. Under this policy, OGA will serve as the initial point of contact for allegations of fraud and corruption in ADB projects or among staff. In consultation with the Strategy and Policy Department (SPD), OGC, BPMSD, COSO, and other relevant departments, OGA will consider appropriate measures to be adopted under this policy to ensure that all ADB staff and projects adhere to the highest standards of ethical conduct.
65. In the event that ADB staff or external parties are not satisfied by OGA’s preliminary finding on a particular case, they can bring it to the attention of Management, who can determine if the case should be resubmitted to OGA for further review, sent to an independent investigator or audit firm for examination, or dismissed if no further action is warranted. A subset of potential cases could also qualify for consideration by the Inspection Committee, provided that they met the criteria for inspection outlined in Establishment of an Inspection Function and the Inspection Procedures approved by the Inspection Committee on 9 October 1996.27
4. Improving the quality of oversight
66. ADB will undertake a number of measures to enhance the quality of project monitoring and audit. These measures will improve the overall quality and effectiveness of ADB-financed projects, thereby ensuring the integrity of ADB operations and making corrupt or illicit behavior more difficult to perpetrate and more readily detected should it occur.
67. The capacity of OGA will be strengthened to enable it to address anticorruption issues effectively. Specialized training in forensic accounting and other investigative techniques will be provided, and be extended to select financial analysts and project implementation officers. Additional staff with specific skills in these areas will be recruited. Ongoing OGA efforts to streamline internal work procedures to free up greater resources for audits of high-risk and high-impact areas will continue. OGA will devote more time to conducting audits of project procurement-related activities, which will help prevent and detect corruption or other forms of fraud. In collaboration with supreme audit institutions in the ADB’s DMCs, OGA will also begin a series of random audits of ADB projects to monitor financial compliance and physical progress. OGA will strengthen its exchange of information with supreme audit institutions in ADB DMCs, and—working in collaboration with other ADB departments—it will play an active role in assessing the need to upgrade the audit capability of such institutions. OGA will also consider ways in which project audit reports can be made more accessible and user-friendly to operations staff. The effectiveness of these measures will be evaluated after the first year and additional steps will be considered as needed.
27 Doc. R225-95, Establishment of an Inspection Function. 10 November. Since many areas where corruption is most likely to occur (such as procurement or the selection of consultants) fall beyond ADB Inspection Committee’s mandate, staff anticipate that relatively few cases of alleged corruption are likely to be brought before the Committee. 44 Anticorruption and Integrity
68. In the context of the recommendations of the Task Force on Improving Project Quality, more resources are already being made available to improve the frequency, duration, and quality of project administration missions.28 Care will be taken to broaden the technical expertise of these missions and to ensure that staff with relevant qualifications participate, particularly in the financial, managerial, and policy areas. Although it may not be possible to upgrade the quality of supervision for all projects across the board, additional resources will be directed toward upgrading the supervision of projects that are particularly at risk and to initiating a program of random audits to monitor project implementation.29
69. The relevant sections in the Project Administration Instructions and the Loan Disbursement Handbook will be revised to require that qualified accountant(s) be recruited by the executing or implementing agency and that robust internal control systems and accounting systems be in place for a project before loan disbursement can be made. Consideration will be given to designing and utilizing appropriate efficiency indicators to monitor financial and physical progress on a quarterly basis, and any variances between targeted efficiency performance and actual performance must be justified. The quality of the ADB’s management information systems will be enhanced to provide managers with more timely information for monitoring project processing, loan administration, and the status of mission budget utilization.
70. When there is compelling evidence that corrupt or illicit activities have hampered the effectiveness of ADB projects or lowered their rate of return, this problem should be explicitly noted in ADB documentation, including project supervisory reports, project completion reports, project evaluation reports, performance audit reports, and other relevant documents so that appropriate remedial action can be considered. Managers and staff should avoid using opaque or euphemistic language that may obscure the nature of the problem.30
5. Advancing staff awareness
71. These measures will be ineffective if ADB staff are unfamiliar with the provisions of ADB’s Anticorruption Policy and Code of Conduct or fail to exercise due diligence in the performance of their duties. While it is not the intention of this policy to turn ADB staff into “police officers,” or to make the objective of reducing corruption paramount over other development goals, all departments and staff have a compelling obligation to ensure the integrity of ADB operations within their respective areas of responsibility. ADB staff will be required to familiarize themselves with the content of this policy and staff guidelines, and be prepared to respond appropriately as required.
72. The integrity of ADB staff is one of the institution’s greatest assets, and staff violations of the ADB’s Code of Conduct or other relevant guidelines will be dealt with severely. Any allegation of corrupt or illicit behavior by ADB staff should be turned over to OGA, who—in conjunction with the relevant ADB departments—will determine the credibility of the accusations and the need for further investigation. Credible claims will be investigated promptly, thoroughly, and confidentially by OGA and BPMSD who can draw upon additional expertise within or outside of ADB as needed. In
28 ADB. 1995. Report of the Task Force on Improving Project Quality. Manila, pp. 22–26. 29 Guidelines will be issued for implementation of the proposed Anticorruption Policy. Prior to this, staff will examine the ways in which ADB operations can be streamlined and cost-effective measures for strengthening project monitoring and supervision can be introduced. 30 For an excellent example of how the topic of corruption can be dealt with candidly yet diplomatically in Bank documents, see Post-Evaluation Office. 1997. Special Study on Issues Pertaining to the Engagement of Consultants in Bank Loan Projects and Their Effect on Project Performance. ADB, Manila. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 45
accordance with the disciplinary procedures outlined in Administrative Order No. 2.04, staff found guilty of such behavior will be subject to a number of sanctions, including reassignment, demotion, suspension without pay, restitution and/or forfeiture of pay, termination, and summary dismissal.31 These sanctions will apply equally to situations in which staff improperly and unlawfully enrich them- selves and/or those close to them, and circumstances in which they induce others to do so.
73. To advance staff awareness, SPD, OGC, OGA, and BPMSD will collaborate in producing a series of internal training workshops and seminars to inform staff about ADB’s policy and to address the issues and options involved in assisting the efforts of DMC governments, suppliers, and contractors to combat corruption.
31 Section 5 of Administrative Order No. 2.04 provides for appeals procedures to the Appeals Committee and ultimately to the Administrative Tribunal. 46 Anticorruption and Integrity
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
74. This paper recommends a number of concrete measures for establishing ADB’s anticorruption policy. These measures can be broken down along three lines: revisions of ADB policy and staff guidelines, new programming and project management initiatives, and internal administrative changes.
75. The following policy recommendations are submitted for consideration and approval by the Board:
(i) Adopt the approach and recommendations contained within this document as a policy paper and as a Management directive in the form of staff instructions. (ii) Approve the revisions to the ADB’s guidelines for procurement and on the use of consultants and the proposed amendment to ADB’s ordinary and special operations loan regulations as set forth in Appendixes 2 and 3. (iii) Consider additional changes in the Project Administration Instructions and Loan Disbursement Handbook to strengthen financial controls and improve reporting requirements.
76. The paper recommends the following changes in ADB programming and project management:
(i) Continue to expand ADB’s assistance on issues of governance and capacity building, with particular attention to promoting market liberalization and public administration reform. (ii) Give increased emphasis to strengthening key institutions for advancing transparency and accountability in the DMCs (such as supreme audit agencies, procurement agencies, regulatory agencies, ombudsman offices, etc.) as part of ADB’s broader emphasis upon governance and capacity building. (iii) Where appropriate, support regional initiatives and research on advancing accountability and transparency in the Asia and Pacific region through TA grants. (iv) Upgrade the quality of supervision during project implementation and strengthen project review missions, with particular emphasis upon those projects most at risk. (v) Develop a series of training seminars, workshops, etc., on the ADB’s anticorruption policy and how staff can best advance integrity within ADB operations and in collaborative work with the DMCs. (vi) Publish a simplified brochure and other information materials describing the ADB’s anticorruption policy for public dissemination.
77. Finally, the paper recommends the following administrative changes in ADB operations at the department/office level:
(i) Enforce current procurement guidelines more rigorously to avoid unnecessary delays, extensions, and excessive change orders. (ii) Designate OGA as the initial point of contact for alleged incidents of corruption among ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 47
ADB projects and staff, and instruct OGA to work out appropriate procedures for performing this function in consultation with relevant ADB departments. (iii) In consultation with BPMSD, consider increasing OGA’s staff complement to enable it to better fulfill its responsibilities under this policy. (iv) In consultation with BPMSD and COSO, consider cost-effective ways to strengthen project monitoring and supervision, and any additional resources that may be necessary to perform these tasks. (v) Direct OGA and BPMSD to collaborate in providing training in forensic accounting and other investigative techniques to select OGA staff, financial analysts, and project implementation officers. (vi) Direct OGC and BPMSD to conduct a series of seminars and/or other informational activities to inform ADB staff about the revisions to Administrative Order No. 2.02; Section 4 regarding the staff Code of Conduct, which were endorsed by Management on 28 May 1998.
78. To monitor and coordinate the ADB’s efforts with respect to anticorruption initiatives and programming, the departments and offices concerned will be requested to provide SPD, OGA, and OGC (in respect of legal frameworks and legal issues of relevance to other areas of action) with periodic appraisals on ways in which they are implementing the policy’s provisions.
79. After Board approval of the ADB’s operational policy on anticorruption issues, a Board paper will be circulated in due course analyzing the ADB’s experience with the Anticorruption Policy, proposing modifications to the operational approach as necessary, and indicating more specific budgetary and other resource implications. 48 Anticorruption and Integrity
VII. APPENDIXES
1 Breakdown of Governance and Capacity-Building Initiatives with Anticorruption Elements
2 Proposed Revisions to ADB’s Guidelines for Procurement Related to Anticorruption
3 Proposed Amendment to Ordinary and Special Operations Loan Regulations ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 49
Appendix 1 Breakdown of Governance and Capacity-Building Initiatives with Strong Anticorruption Elements
Target Entity Type of Intervention Example
Executive Branch Civil Service Commission • Revise pay and benefits to ensure TA 2616 to Sri Lanka for Public comparability with alternative employment Administration Reform opportunities • Strengthen measures for establishment monitoring and control • Develop and widely publicize civil service code of ethics
Ministry of Finance/ Ministry • Strengthen management control and TA 2538 Improved Budget Management of Development information systems in Micronesia
• Strengthen expenditure monitoring and Loan 1506 for India Gujarat Public Sector control Resource Management Program
• Support strengthening procurement guidelines TA 2701 Institutional Strengthening of the National Office for Procurement Evaluation in Viet Nam
Various executive branch • Streamline and reengineer business processes TA 2186 Strengthening the Legal ministries, agencies, and to reduce opportunities for the payment of Framework for Customs Administration in departments speed money the People’s Republic of China
• Institute measures to make the agency/citizen TA 2459 Technical Assistance to Nepal interface more transparent and user-friendly, for Efficiency Enhancement of Customs through name tags, document requirements, Operations posted fee schedules, etc.
Legislative Branch • Enhance capacity and independence of RETA 5688 Regional Long-Term Audit Supreme Audit Agency Supreme Audit Agency Training Program for Members of the Asian Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions
TA 2463 for Institutional Strengthening of the Office of the Auditor General in Fiji Islands
Parliamentary research • Strengthen capacity of Parliament to USAID/CRS Efforts to Strengthen institutions serve independent watchdog function Parliamentary Capacity in Economies in Transition
Ombudsman Office, etc. • Strengthen access of citizens for independent TA 2599 Civil Service Reform redress of grievances Implementation for Marshall Islands UNDP Project on Policy Coordination and Governance in the South Pacific
Judicial Branch Reducing judicial backlog • Develop mechanisms for alternative dispute TA 2521 for Alternative Dispute resolution Resolution in India
Strengthening primary • Support continuing education for judges and TA 2727 Restructuring and Capacity institutions: the judiciary and lawyers Building in Mongolia’s Ministry of Justice Ministry of Justice • Introduce updated court management and Strengthening secondary information systems institutions: law schools and local legal research
Civil Society • Provide feedback loops between business and Business-government councils government on general good governance issues 50 Anticorruption and Integrity
Appendix 2
Proposed Revisions to ADB’s Guidelines for Procurement Related to Anticorruption38
In keeping with evolving best practice among multilateral development banks, Sections 2.14, 2.15, and 2.16 of ADB’s Guidelines for Procurement will be modified as follows:
Fraud and Corruption
2.14 It is the ADB’s policy to require that borrowers (including beneficiaries of ADB loans) as well as bidders/suppliers/contractors under ADB-financed contracts observe the highest standard of ethics during the procurement and execution of such contracts. In pursuance of this policy, ADB:
(a) defines, for the purposes of this provision, the terms set forth below as follows: (i) “corruptpractice” means behavior on the part of officials in the public or private sectors by which they improperly and unlawfully enrich themselves and/or those close to them, or induce others to do so, by misusing the position in which they are placed, and it includes the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any thing of value to influence the action of any such official in the procurement process or in contract execution; and (ii) “fraudulent practice” means a misrepresentation of facts in order to influence a procurement process or the execution of a contract to the detriment of the borrower, and includes collusive practices among bidders (prior to or after bid submission) designed to establish bid prices at artificial, noncompetitive levels and to deprive the borrower of the benefits of free and open competition; (b) will reject a proposal for award if it determines that the bidder recommended for award has engaged in corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for the contracts in question; (c) will cancel the portion of the loan allocated to a contract for goods or works if it at any time determines that corrupt or fraudulent practices were engaged in by representatives of the borrower or of a beneficiary of the loan during the procurement or the execution of that contract, without the borrower having taken timely and appropriate action sat- isfactory to ADB to remedy the situation; (d) will declare a firm ineligible, either indefinitely or for a stated period, to be awarded an ADB-financed contract if it at any time determines that the firm has engaged in corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for, or in executing, an ADB-financed contract; and (e) will have the right to require that, in contracts financed by an ADB loan, a provision be included requiring suppliers and contractors to permit ADB to inspect their accounts and records relating to the performance of the contract and to have them audited by auditors appointed by ADB.
38 Similar provisions will be inserted into ADB’s Guidelines on the Use of Consultants by the Asian Development Bank and its Borrowers. ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (2 July 1998) 51
2.15 With the specific agreement of ADB, a borrower may introduce, into bid forms for large contracts financed by ADB, an undertaking of the bidder to observe, in competing for and executing a contract, the country’s laws against fraud and corruption (including bribery), as listed in the bidding documents. A footnote should also be inserted into documents where such a pledge has been inserted, noting that it has been placed there at the request of the borrower.
2.16 When the contract is to be financed wholly or partly by ADB the contract documents shall include an undertaking by the contractor that no fees, gratuities, rebates, gifts, commissions or other payments, other than those shown in the bid, have been given or received in connection with the pro- curement process or in the contract execution. 52 Anticorruption and Integrity
Appendix 3
Proposed Amendment to the Ordinary and Special Operations Loan Regulations
Section 8.03 of the Ordinary Operations Loan Regulations and the Special Operations Loan Regulations will be amended to read as follows. The relevant revisions have been underlined.
Section 8.03. Cancellation by ADB. If (i) the right of the Borrower to make withdrawals from the Loan Account shall have been suspended with respect to any amount of the Loan for a continuous period of thirty (30) days, or (ii) at any time ADB determines, after consultation with the Borrower, that any amount of the Loan will not be required for the purposes of the Project, or (iii) at any time ADB determines, with respect to any contract to be financed out of the proceeds of the Loan, that corrupt or fraudulent practices were engaged in by representatives of the Borrower or of a beneficiary of the Loan during the procurement/consultant selection or the execution of such contract, without the Borrower having taken timely and appropriate action satisfactory to ADB to remedy the situation, or (iv) at any time ADB determines that the procurement of any contract to be financed out of the proceeds of the Loan is inconsistent with the procedures set forth or referred to in the Loan Agreement, or (v) by the date specified in the Loan Agreement as the closing date for withdrawals an amount of the Loan shall remain unwithdrawn from the Loan Account, ADB may by notice to the Borrower and the Guarantor, if any, terminate the right of the Borrower to make withdrawals with respect to such amount or contract. Upon giving of such notice, the amount of the Loan or the relevant portion thereof shall be canceled.
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Project 1 Sub Components
1.1 - Roadmap Management 1.2 - Roadmap Institutional Strengthening (TA A1) 1.3 - Institutional Strengthening for IWRM in 6 Ci’s River Basin Territory (TA B1) 1.4 - Spatial Planning for The 6 CIs River Basin Territory (TA B2) 2.1 - West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation Project 2.2 - Improved Land and Water Management 2.3 - Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation 2.6 - Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading Bandung Water Sources 3.1 - Development of Key Policies and Strategies for Water Resources Management in CRB (TA B3) 4.1 - Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans 5.1 - Upper Citarum Basin Flood Management (TA C1) 5.2 – Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation (TA E1) 7.1 - Decision Support System for Integrated Water Resources Management in Citarum River Basin (TA D1) 8.1 - Program Management 8.2 - Independent Monitoring and Evaluation
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 1.1 - Roadmap Management
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 H Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 36 months (exclude Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 1.1 : Roadmap Management MFF Project 1 - Road 36 months Map Coordination Management Unit - BAPPENAS (intermitent) 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Advance procurement of consultants 9 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Coordination among Road Map component projects
5 1.2.1 Prepare stakeholder mapping including Government agencies, CSOs 3 months and private sector at national, provincial and district levels 6 1.2.2 Facilitate for coordination among sectors at national, provincial and intermitent district levels (vertical and horizontal integration of agencies) 7 1.2.3 For the Investment Program, assist the RCMU in defining the task of 3 months each project implementing agencies 8 1.2.4 Facilitate for coordinating loan allocations and support RCMU intermitent Investment Program budgeting process 9 1.2.5 Prepare inventories overlap of tasks, gaps, and facilitate roll sharing intermitent arrangements amongst government agencies and other stakeholders (Roadmap and Investment Program) ####1.2.6 Assist RCMU to disseminate and follow up key issues to Bappeda at 3 months Provincial and District levels and across Bappenas Sectoral Divisions ####1.2.7 Assist RCMU for the preparation of Annual Work Program 3 months/year ####1.2.9 Prepare an interagency coordination mechanism (Central and 3 months Regional Governance) in formulating the Investment Program ####1.2.10 Assist the policy and program coordination related to intermitent ICWRMIP-Project I program implementation (intermittent) ####1.2.11 Facilitate coordination of Roadmap AWPs (intermittent) intermitent
####1.2.12 Identify potential non-government funding sources (loans and grants) intermitent for Road map implementation ####1.2.13 Identify grant funding e.g CDM, CSR, bilateral and multilateral agency intermitent for assisting Road map implementation ####1.2.14 Support the implementation of RCMU AWP intermitent
####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Studies, Dialogue and Preparation for Future Projects Implementation ####1.3.1 Review prioritization of activities MFF and other funding 3 months ####1.3.2 Review the establishment of provincial and district government 3 months project funding mechanisms and select activities for MFF and non-MFF funding ####1.3.3 Assist consultations with stakeholders and planners under RCMU intermitent coordination ####1.3.4 Review priority activities in accordance with Rencana and funding 4 months Gaps ####1.3.5 Facilitate the formulation of Project 2 concept activities and Project 4 months Implementing Unit (PIUs) and those delayed activities for future ####1.3.6 Reviewmechanisms of implementation and lessons learned from P1 4 months
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 H Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J ####1.3.7 Update program implementation procedures and quality assurance 3 months processes ####1.3.8 Update through RCMU management information system funding intermitent priorities and gaps for the Rencana ####1.3.9 Review budgets allocations for sectoral agency planning and feasibility intermitent studies detailed design, and advance preparation (e.g. environmental and social safeguards) for Road map subprojects ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Support the RCMU and its secretariat operation
####1.4.1 Organize routine meetings intermitent
####1.4.2 Assist RCMU for the preparation of policy issues papers including intermitent follow up action after meetings ####1.4.3 Support the management of Road map planning and implementation intermitent including M & E reporting ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Funding allocations management
####1.5.1 Establishment of a Funding Database for Roadmap implementation 4 months ####1.5.2 Assistin planning and managementoffunding allocations in a timely intermitent coordinated way across Agencies ####1.5.3 Facilitate the funding allocations coordination with regional Bappeda intermitent
####1.5.4 Support liaison with bilateral and multilateral donors intermitent
####1.5.5 Assist in evaluation of funding gaps and assessment of the effect on intermitent Road map implementation ####1.5.6 Support financial awareness and fund raising lobbying initiative intermitent
####1.5.7 Monitoring and evaluate the effectiveness of community and intermitent Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) financing and promote appropriate CSR action in CRB ####1.5.8 Identify and facilitate the development of private sector funding inputs intermitent to the Road map ####1.5.9 Identify and facilitate the development of community driven intermitent development and financing for Road map implementation ####1.5.10 Develop mechanisms for evaluation of most effect financing and intermitent implementation arrangements for cost efficient Road map ####1.6 Main Activity 5 : Assistance with Capacity Building for Road map Management ####1.6.1 Assistance with capacity building for Road map management activities intermitent will cover planning, programming, finance, budgeting, GOI and ADB policy ####1.7 Main Activity 6 : Coordination and Synergetic Planning of ICWRMIP Initiatives with Other National and Regional Governments, Private Sector (CSR) and/or CSOs
Page 2 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 H Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J ####1.7.1 Coordinate the Roadmap between program in ICWRMIP Project I with intermitent another program initiatives (intermittent) ####1.7.2 Reviewand monitor GN-KPA implementing models (or similar 3 months initiatives) and identify any synergies and collaborative activities with the Road map implementation ####1.8 Main Activity 7 : Development of Road map Data and Information System ####1.8.1 Working in close coordination with Excecuting Agency (EA), PCMU 3 months and coordination with Directorate General of Spatial Planning (DGSP) to develop an integrated Management Information System (MIS) for CRB ####1.8.2 Collect spatial planning data in related agencies 3 months ####1.8.3 Design a dedicated geographic database for exisiting facilities 6 months agencies coordination, on going and proposed projects (including Government, CSOs and CSRs initiatives) for planning purposes ####1.8.4 Integrate and disseminate through internet information related to intermitent project planning and spatial planning ####1.9 Main Activity 8 : Identification and development of private sector investment opportunities ####1.9.1 Identify specific private sector investment opportunities on water 4 months/year resources infrastructure and watershed conservation in CRB ####1.9.2 Prepare a plan defining synergy between public and private sector 4 months/year partners in CRB ####1.9.3 Preparation of PPP projects for Citarum 4 months/year ####1.9.4 Identify private sector partners in CRB 2 months/year ####1.9.5 Work with PCMU provincial agencies reviewthe inventory of the 3 months/year currentlarge ground water users in CRB and engage in dialogue for ####1.9.6 Work jointly with PCMU and MOE reviewan inventory ofthe current 3 months/year large private sector polluters and engage in dialogue for waste water ####1.10 Main Activity 9 : Identification and Development of Community Lead Investment Opportunities ####1.10.1 Identify specific Community Driven Development (CDD) investment 3 months opportunities on water resources infrastructure in CRB ####1.10.2 Prepare a plan defining synergy between Communities NGOs and 6 months public sector agencies in CRB ####1.10.3 Facilitate preparation of CDD projects for Citarum 27 months
####1.10.4 Identify key NGO and CSO partners in CRB 3 months ####1.10.5 Prepare an inventory of the current large ground water users in CRB 3 months and engage in dialogue for surface water replacement schemes
####1.10.6 Prepare an inventory of the current large community polluters and 3 months engage in dialogue for waste water treatment ####1.11 Main Activity 10 : Road map Media communication Plan, Information Dissemination and Implementation
Page 3 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 H Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J ####1.11.1 Prepare and introduce a road map media communication plan 6 months related to ICWRMIP P1 and Road map implementation in close collaboration with PCMU ####1.11.2 Execute the media plan for the Road map intermitent
####1.11.3 Disseminate the overall ICWRMIP P1 performance through internet intermitent and other communication media ####1.12 Main Activity 11 : Quality Assurance Systems ####1.12.1 Implement in RCMU and support PIU’s implementation of 3 months performance management using modern practices for quality management and document control including Office Procedures Manual (OPM), Document Control System (DCS), Quality ManagementManual (QMM) ####1.12.2 Provide oversight monitoring and evaluation of results based outputs intermitent Quality Control (QC)/Quality Assurance (QA) activities on program services, assess value of outputs for given inputs and build lessons learned into newactivities and ongoing programs ####1.12.3 Provide oversight monitoring and evaluation of Results Based Outputs intermitent QC/QA activities on physical works assess value of outputs for given inputs and build lessons learned into newactivities and ongoing programs ####1.13 Main Activity 12 : Preparation of Parallel Road map Activities ####1.13.1 Update planning for Road map funding programs with national and 3 months regional governments ####1.13.2 Reviewprivate sector, CSR, and CSO financial inputs to Road map 5 months ####1.13.3 Update Road map financing targets 2 months ####1.13.4 Assess how financing options affect river performance benchmark 2 months/year targets ####1.13.5 Provide decision makers with update financial reporting on ongoing 2 months Road map implementation and make recommendations for any ####1.13.6 Provide stakeholders with updated financial plans 2 months
Page 4
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 1.2 - Roadmap Institutional Strengthening (TA A1)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 36 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 1.2 : Roadmap Institutional Strengthening TA 7189 36 months Road Map Coordination Management Unit DIWR - BAPPENAS 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Coordination and Communication Strengthening among Stakeholders 5 1.2.1 Review of the effectiveness of Roll Sharing between CRB 2 months management organizations 6 1.2.2 Review of the cost effectiveness of existing Roll Sharing between 3 months community and government in planning and implementation of 7 1.2.3 Stakeholder identification 3 months 8 1.2.4 Roadmap working Group establishment (cover all stakeholder) 3 months 9 1.2.5 Prepare guidelines on assessment of Institutional Development and 3 months Organizational Strengthening ####1.2.6 Agenda and material preparation for working group meeting intermitent ####1.2.7 Working Group meeting on regular basis intermitent ####1.2.8 Prepare follow up action after meeting intermitent ####1.2.9 Prepare and submission required reporting regarding the result of intermitent working group meeting ####1.4 Main Activity 2 : Strengthening of RCMU and Regional BAPPEDA ####1.4.1 Capacity Development Action Plans of RCMU and regional BAPPEDA 6 months related to IWRM planning, management and policy activities ####1.4.2 Selective Capacity Building Activities based on CDAPs intermitent ####1.4.3 Conduct workshops, seminars and conferences intermitent ####1.14 Main Activity 3 : Dissemination of Roadmap Mechanisms ####1.14.7 Funding and fiscal planning mechanisms gaps identification within the 4 months 6 Ci’s river basin territory ####1.14.8 Carry out roadmap funding and fiscal planning mechanisms 4 months dissemination campaign ####1.14.9 Prepare recommendations for roadmap development (extension of 3 months the Citarum road map) to cover the entire 6 Ci’s river basin territory ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Best Practices ####1.5.1 Review of International experience in implementation of IWRM 3 months planning and financing in river basins ####1.5.2 Review of best practices in Indonesia 3 months ####1.5.3 Stakeholder workshops developing ad exchanging best practices intermitent ####1.5.4 Community and CSOs bestprogram awards 1 month/year ####1.5.5 Workshops, seminars conferences intermitent ####1.5.6 CSR best programs awards 1 month/year ####1.5.7 Exchange of knowledge and identification of knowledge and intermitent experience gaps ####1.5.8 Participation of key stakeholders in national and international events intermitent
Page 1
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 1.3 - Institutional Strengthening for IWRM in 6 Ci’s River Basin Territory (TA B1)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 36 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 1.3 : Institutional Strengthening for IWRM in 6 Ci's 36 months River Basin Territory TA 7189 DWRM - MoPW 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Capacity Building and Support 5 1.2.1 Surveys, analysis, dialogue and empowerment of communities and 4 months their representatives 6 1.2.2 Capacity building for stakeholders, CSOs involved in water resources intermitent management in the three river basins 7 1.2.3 Assistance in establishing the Water Resources Councils, river basin 4 months management offices and support unit(s) for improved policy 8 1.2.4 Ongoing support and capacity building for the Councils, river basin intermitent management offices and support unit(s) 9 1.2.5 Support to the development of capacity for water resources O & M 6 months and asset management ####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Implementation of the Capacity Building ####1.3.1 Implementation of capacity building action plan management, human intermitent resources management, institutional arrangements, legal framework for river basin management, river basin coordination and IWRM, monitoring and evaluation and action plans including peer re ####1.3.2 Skills development including executive development, management intermitent and team leadership, administrative and technical skills for staff and knowledge management ####1.3.3 Job skills development including conflict resolution and negotiation, intermitent community consultation and participation ####1.3.4 River basin coordination including IWRM awareness and intermitent implementation, river basin coordination and consultation, role sharing, communications strategy and communications and awareness programs, river basin exchange program, river basin ####1.3.5 Iinfrastructure development and management including infrastructure 6 months asset management, and support for river basin planning activities roadmapping and a strategic river basin plan (pola) and basin master ####1.3.6 Technical capacity strengthening including hydrological modeling, intermitent gender and poverty targeting, and water data collection and ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Data and Information ####1.4.1 Collect and collate existing available data related to basin surface and 3 months groundwater, and a comprehensive database thereof ####1.4.2 Develop an Internet-based metadatabase (data inventory) for water, 6 months land and related data in the 6 Ci’s River Basin Territory in close ####1.4.3 Design and implementa web-based MIS for 6 Ci’s stakeholders 6 months ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : River Basin Modeling ####1.5.1 Identify potentially useful modeling packages for an integrated river 3 months basin water quantity (water balance) model, and assist DGWR in the selection the mostsuitable model or models (each Balai Besar (and also PJT-2 in the Citarum River Basin) may have exi
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D ####1.5.2 Develop, calibrate and validate (and or upgrade) a water balance 6 months model for the 6 Ci’s River Basin Territory for use by relevantagencies for policy and planning ####1.5.3 Run water resource development and management scenarios 4 months interrogating water-related resources and services outputs (include future climate change and spatial planning scenarios) ####1.5.4 Provide on the job training for modeling use and update intermitent ####1.6 Main Activity 5 : Basin Planning and Development of Pola and Rencana ####1.6.1 Develop a stakeholder assessmentand map outin a participatory 3 months manner the stakeholder driven consultative mechanisms for Pola and Rencana development ####1.6.2 Develop a roadmap vissionary planning framework in collaboration 6 months with stakeholders to include the preparation of a strategic river basin plan (pola) and basin master plans (rencana) that will facilitate improved and more integrated water resource manageme ####1.6.3 Facilitate the process leading to development of the Pola and for water intermitent resources developmentand managementin the 6 Cis River Basin Territory (with the Citarum River Basin an initial priority) ####1.6.4 Assist stakeholders in preparation the Rencana based on the Pola 6 months ####1.6.5 Development and implementation of a mechanism for monitoring the implementation (Rencana) of the river basin plan by line agencies and CSOs with that responsibility, and reporting progress to government and Water Council ####1.7 Main Activity 6 : State of the Basin Reporting ####1.7.1 Review of “state of the basin” existing/best practices reporting 3 months procedures ####1.7.2 Development of an appropriate process and guidelines to produce 3 months and disseminate a “state of the basin” report to identify problem areas, cause/sources and needed remedies ####1.7.3 Initial state of the basin benchmarking and definition of targets 3 months ####1.7.4 Facilitate Peer review of 'basin benchmarking' intermitent ####1.7.5 Produce first annual state of the basin reports jointly with 3 months/year stakeholders develop with stakeholders process for routine annual reporting ####1.7.6 Assist in dissemination and dialogue of state of the basin reports intermitent ####1.7.7 External independent monitoring of the basin reporting mechanisms intermitent
Page 2
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 1.4 - Spatial Planning for The 6 CIs River Basin Territory (TA B2)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 18 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 1.4 : Spatial Planning in 6 Ci's River Basin Territory 18 months TA 7189 DGSP- MoPW 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Provide internally consistent future projections 5 1.2.1 The spatial distribution at village level of the population and employment 4 months 6 1.2.2 The urban area growth needed to accommodate human activities 4 months 7 1.2.3 The land-use changes caused by the urban area growth 4 months 8 1.2.4 Support the development of capacity for water resources O & M and 4 months Asset Management 9 1.3 Main Activity 2 : Provides in particular a consistent projection of urban/rural land-use with important consequences for total water demand ####1.3.1 Socio-economic projection of population/employment at Kabupaten 3 months level based on economic growth scenarios ####1.3.2 Spatial allocation of population and land-use for West Java at desa 3 months level ####1.3.3 Post processing module to calculate water indicators, such as water 4 months demands, and pollutant emissions at water district level within the ####1.3.4 River Basin Coordination including IWRM Awareness and intermitent Implementation , River basin coordination and consultation, Role Sharing, Communications Strategy, River Basin Exchange Program, River basin status reporting ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Spatial model in river basin studies ####1.4.1 Identification of spatially related interests and planned developments 4 months in different sectors (i.e. housing, industry, agriculture, forestry, transport, etc.) for the river basin; quantification of spatial claims from different sectors ####1.4.2 Preparation of overall consistent spatial scenario’s for the river basin 6 months involving resolution of conflicts in spatial claims ####1.4.3 Quantification of the spatial scenario’s using the zoning for the different 6 months sectors, resulting in a projected land-use and spatial distribution of residents and employment, leading to the impacton water demands and emissions ####1.4.4 Quantification of water-related zoning on land-use in the basin (low-flow and peak-flow conservation zoning, flood zoning, erosion zoning, groundwater protection zoning, etc), based on the water resources analysis for the river basin ####1.4.5 Strategic assessment of the impacts of water related zoning on other sectors ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Data Collection Needs for the Spatial Model ####1.5.1 Improved land-use start year (2000) data by desa ####1.5.2 Population and employment data at desa level from PODES 2000 ####1.5.3 Study area specific land demands and zoning plans from other sectors
Page 1
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 2.1 - West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation Project
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Duration Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities
1 1 Sub Component 2.1 : Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal MFF P1 53 months - Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum - Ministry of Public Works (exclude Procurement) 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Procurement of consultants 21 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1: Detailed Engineering Design 5 1.2.1 Carry out detailed engineering design of WTC rehabilitation 12 months 6 1.3 Main Activity 2 : Bekasi Syphon works tenders and urgent maintenance 7 1.3.1 Prequalification of contractors for Bekasi syphon 6 months 8 1.3.2 Tendering, selection of contractors and contract negotiation for Bekasi 3 months syphon 9 1.3.3 Mobilisation, pre-construction survey and setting out for Bekasi 6 months syphon ####1.3.4 Construction supervision for Bekasi syphon 20 months ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Tendering main packages ####1.4.1 Prequalification of contractors 6 months ####1.4.2 Tendering, selection of contractors and contract negotiation 12 months ####1.5 Main Activity 4: Construction of Rehabilitation Works ####1.5.1 Mobilisation, pre-construction survey and setting out 6 months ####1.5.2 Construction supervision 21 months ####1.5.3 Removal and disposal ofsediments from the WTC canal bed, 21 months strengthening of embankments ####1.5.4 Concrete and masonry works 21 months ####1.5.5 Hydro-mechanical equipment procurement and manufacturing 9 months ####1.5.6 Installation of hydro-mechanical equipment 12 months ####1.5.7 Improved O&M support of existing WTC facilities during DED and 6 months Construction (intermitent) ####1.5.9 System level operations distribution planning with water users 53 months (intermitent) ####1.5.10 Water delivery scheduling and M&E 53 months (intermitent) ####1.5.11 Water Quality M&E and updating ofexisiting WTC WQ model (PJT II) 53 months (intermitent) ####1.5.12 M&E of conveyance capacity and WQ delivery 53 months (intermitent) ####1.5.13 Priority maintenance work during construction 53 months (intermitent) ####1.5.14 Managing community WSS systems along the WTC 52 months (intermitent) ####1.5.15 Managing the water delivery services with water users participation 52 months (intermitent)
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Duration Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 ####1.5.16 Training and workshops 52 months (intermitent) ####1.5.8 Completion Activities: trial (O & M provision during trial), trainning, 3 months provision ofguidelines for O & M and handover ####1.6 Main Activity 5: Associated Activities ####1.6.1 Capacity building of PJT II for improved management and operation 12 months of WTC ####1.7 Main Activity 6 : Data and Information Management ####1.7.1 Surveys and data collection 3 months ####1.7.2 Develop and/or Update WTC Geographic Information Systems 3 months ####1.7.3 Provide on the job training and supportfor Geographic based 53 months database maintenance and development with integration of spatial (intermitent) planning data ####1.8 Main Activity 7 : Safeguards Implementation ####1.8.1 Prepare AMDAL for the Bekasi works 2008 6 months ####1.8.2 Prepare AMDAL for the Main Works 2009 6 months ####1.8.3 Environmental Management Plan Implementation 12 months ####1.8.4 Support for the Resettlement Plan Implementation 53 months (intermitent) ####1.9 Main Activity 8 : Community Empowernment ####1.9.1 Coordination and support for existing local government community 53 months empowerment program (intermitent)
Page 2
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 2.2 - Improved Land and Water Management
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Duration J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 27 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 2.2 : Improved Land and Water Management MFF P1 27 months - Ministry of Agriculture 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Consultants Procurement 9 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1: Identification and Appraisal of Target Areas 5 1.2.1 Identification of target farmer groups 6 1.2.1.1 Coordination with Agriculture Provincial and District Agencies 2 months 7 1.2.1.2 Establish criteria for selection of water management sites 2 months 8 1.2.2 Participatory Rural Appraisal for 3 districts 9 1.2.2.1 Survey ofMain Canal and drainage system works 2 months ####1.2.2.2 Review ongoing agricultural extension support programs 1 months ####1.2.2.3 Collect and analyze data about rural participation from farmer 1 months groups recommended by the Agricultural Provincial and District Agencies
####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Capacity Building ####1.3.1 Community Empowerment ####1.3.1.1 Engagement with Water Users Associations WUAs 3 months ####1.3.1.2 Assessment of WUAs capacity to improved water management 1 months ####1.3.1.3 WUAs agreements for management of equipment and livestock 1 months ####1.3.1.4 Train WUAs in M&E 1 months ####1.3.2 Provision of training of trainers for extension service staff and key facilitators ####1.3.2.1 Development and production of training material 1 month ####1.3.2.2 Selection of participants 1 month ####1.3.2.3 Provision of the training 3 months (intermitent) ####1.3.3 Training for farmers (Farmer empowerment) ####1.3.3.1 Selection of participants 1 month ####1.3.3.2 Provision of the training 5 months (intermitent) ####1.3.4 Comparative Studies ####1.3.4.1 Prepare a comparative Studies for West Java 2 months ####1.3.4.2 Prepare comparative Studies for GOI staff and NGOs 2 months
####1.3.4.3 Provision of workshops at district and Provincial level intermitent
####1.4 Main Activity 3: Progressive implementation of System Rice Intencification (SRI) within pilot plots ####1.4.1 Civil work (construction of chooper and organic material storage) intermitent
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Duration J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J ####1.4.2 Production of organic fertilizer – distribution of units intermitent ####1.4.3 Acquisition and distribution of livestock cows intermitent ####1.4.4 Acquisition and distribution of selected seeds intermitent ####1.4.5 Implementation ofSystem Rice Intencification (SRI) in demonstration plots ####1.4.5.1 Preparation of System Rice Intencification (SRI) implementation 2 months plans with farmers and Agricultural Provincial & district Agencies ####1.4.5.2 Implementation of System Rice Intencification (SRI) demonstration Plots13 months ####1.5 Main Activity 4: Associated Activities ####1.5.1 Monitoring and evaluation program ####1.5.1.1 Prepare procedure and mechanism for monitoring and 3 months evaluation ####1.5.1.2 Engage local university to lead water management M&E with 13 months local schools and university students (intermitent) ####1.5.1.3 Coordinate water management M&E 6 months ####1.5.2 Preparation of System Rice Intencification (SRI) program for Project 2 ####1.5.2.1 Review implementation System Rice Intencification (SRI) of 2 months Project 1 ####1.5.2.2 Planning System Rice Intencification (SRI) for Project 2 3 months ####1.5.3 Preparation of Improvement of Agriculture Management program for Project 2 ####1.5.3.1 Identification of target area 2 months ####1.5.3.2 Detailed design of onfarm facilities 3 months ####1.5.4 Preparation of Farming System Management for Sustainable Upland Conservation program for Project 2 ####1.5.4.1 Identification of target area 2 months ####1.5.4.2 Detailed Design for Project 2 Implementation 3 months ####1.5.5 Information dissemination through media and adjacent communities ####1.5.5.1 Preparation of a media strategy information dissemination 1 month ####1.5.5.2 Information dissemination through media and adjacent 18 months communities ####1.5.5.3 SRI National Workshop 1 week
Page 2
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 2.3 - Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Duration 2009 2010 2011 2012 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 24 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 2.3 : Support for Community and CSO Driven 24 months Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation MFF P1 - 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Procurement of Consultants 9 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1: Community Empowerment and Local Institutional Development 5 1.2.1 Implementation of CDD processes at community level 6 1.2.1.1 Review existing documentation from current WSS projects 2 months 7 1.2.1.2 Develop supporting policies, guidelines and manuals for the 3 months community process 8 1.2.1.3 Identification and selection of CSOs 3 months 9 1.2.1.4 Identification and selection of community facilitators 2 months ####1.2.1.5 Training to community facilitators for water engineering, hygiene 3 months and sanitation and community development/social ####1.2.1.6 Provision of training for community group 2 months ####1.2.1.7 Support implementation of CDD processes Intermitent ####1.2.1.8 Provide ongoing coaching and mentoring for community facilitators Intermitent ####1.2.2 Development of mechanisms and capacities of provincial, district and sub-district institutions for quality program ####1.2.2.1 Reviewof existing materials and subsequent development of 3 months guidelines and manuals, orientations and training to ensure program administration complies with program rules and ####1.2.2.2 Develop an annual capacity building plan to address systemic, 3 months institutional and skill gaps for program management, based on an institutional mapping exercise of roles and responsibilities (M & E, Technical, O & M, Institutional, financial) ####1.2.2.3 Review guidelines, workshops, generic TORs and master 1 month curriculum and training modules, which can be tailored for local needs and training oftrainers (TOT) to ensure the quality and relevance of delivery
####1.2.2.4 Prepare an annual program of workshops, training including 1 month regular training and coaching for community facilitators ####1.2.2.5 Carry out annual institutional assessments using MPA: 3 months/years performance assessment of district agencies and policy environment assessment (done annually at national level)
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Duration 2009 2010 2011 2012 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ####1.2.2.6 Develop a knowledge managementplan in the first6 months by 4 months PIU for ensuring dissemination of lessons learnt and good practice. This would include developing an integrated approach for M&E capacity building using a range oftraining
####1.2.2.7 Provide training of trainer programs to strengthen the capacity of 1 month local CSOs and firms ####1.2.3 Development of mechanisms and capacities of provincial and district institutions for scaling up and mainstreaming community driven WSS ####1.2.3.1 Advocacy to district leadership (i.e. Bupati and DPRD) on district Intermitent performance and resourcing for community-based WSS through exchange visits, advocacy packages and promotional activities on achievements of PAMSIMAS (and other participatory WSS ####1.2.3.2 Review provincial and district local policies, financing 3 months arrangements and legislation in relation to WSS to identify changes to bring these together into a more effective framework for scaling up and replication to other districts. ####1.2.3.3 Develop an institutional capacity building plan for implementation 3 months of provincial and district plans and development of delivery mechanisms for such capacity building.
####1.2.3.4 Conduct a reviewto identify and strengthen linkages with other 1 month local development strategies for poverty reduction, village development and health improvements to leverage other available resources and programs. ####1.2.3.5 Develop provincial action plans and supporting materials to 3 months enhance civil society participation in local government planning and service delivery for WSS, including IEC on local economic and social benefits of WSS, multi-stakeholder forums, etc ####1.2.3.6 Identify and provide training of local trainers to provide accredited 1 month community facilitator training to meet anticipated increased demand and to markettheir services to local government. ####1.3 Main Activity 2: Improving Hygiene and Sanitation Behaviour and Services ####1.3.1 Total Sanitation Program based on the Community Let Total Sanitation (CLTS) method ####1.3.1.1 ReviewManual for Total Sanitation Campaign for District and 1 month Sub-District team; Advocacy for Province/District Stakeholders and/or Informal Leaders; and Sanitation Options ####1.3.1.2 Provide Training of Trainers for Provincial/District Team 1 month ####1.3.1.3 Provision of Provincial Workshops 1 week ####1.3.1.4 Supervision & Technical Assistance Intermitent ####1.3.1.5 Provide advocacy/orientation with decision makers and opinion Intermitent makers to explain approach and obtain supportfor CLTS ####1.3.1.6 Review Province specific sanitation options 1 month Page 2 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Duration 2009 2010 2011 2012 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ####1.3.1.7 Provide Training for Sub-District/Village Team/Social intermediaries 1 month ####1.3.1.8 Implement Village Facilitation process Intermitent ####1.3.1.9 Monitoring and Evaluation of Village Implementation Intermitent ####1.3.2 Sanitation & Hygiene Marketing Program ####1.3.2.1 Review guidelines and prototypal design for: Provincial 1 month Market/Consumer/Supplier Studies ####1.3.2.2 Reviewguidelines for supply chain building based on other 1 month experiences ####1.3.2.3 Implement Provincial sanitation and hygiene demand-generation Intermitent campaigns ####1.3.2.4 Provide technical Assistance for implementation of Sanitation and Intermitent Hygiene Marketing in provinces and districts ####1.3.2.5 Provide advocacy/orientation with decision makers and opinion Intermitent makers to explain approach and obtain support for marketing ####1.3.2.6 Study of local sanitation market, consumers and supplier for 3 months identifying messages and communication methods/media for segmented beneficiaries, and supply chain facilitation ####1.3.3 School Hygiene and Sanitation Program ####1.3.3.1 Province/District workshops on school hygiene and sanitation Intermitent (each year) ####1.3.3.2 Review School Hygiene / Health curricula 1 month ####1.3.3.3 ReviewManual for Teacher and Children Training 1 month ####1.3.3.4 ReviewTeacher Manual 1 month ####1.3.3.5 Provide Training for Trainers for Teacher and Children training 1 month ####1.3.3.6 Provide Training for Teacher and Children 1 month ####1.3.3.7 Provide District Workshops for inserting curricula Intermitent (each year) ####1.3.3.8 Provide Awareness campaign for school communities (children, Intermitent teachers, parents) ####1.3.4 Strengthening Local Sanitation and Hygiene Units ####1.3.4.1 ReviewTOR and guidelines for building capacity of Provincial 1 month and District Units responsible for Environmental Health and Hygiene Promotion ####1.3.4.2 ReviewDesign for Monitoring Impact of Sanitation and Hygiene 1 month Intervention ####1.3.4.3 Provide training for District staffs responsible for Environmental 1 month health and Hygiene promotion in implementing Performance and Impact Monitoring ####1.3.4.4 Provide training for Puskesmas Sanitarian/ Pustu staff / Bidan 1 month Desa for sanitation and hygiene program performance monitoring and access monitoring at community level through participatory monitoring ####1.3.4.5 Implement annual two-week surveillance for water borne 2 weeks/year diseases (diarrhoea, etc) at selected program/non—program
Page 3 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Duration 2009 2010 2011 2012 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ####1.3.5 Support implementation of existing environmental management initiative, especially in industrial area ####1.4 Main Activity 3: Water Supply and Peri-Urban Institutional Sanitation Infrastructure ####1.4.1 Planning Assistance and Technical support ####1.4.1.1 Rapid Technical Assessment (RTA) and Community WSS 3 months situation analysis (MPA-PHAST) to determine water demand and system options ####1.4.1.2 Develop Village Action Plans (including commitment for in 2 months kind/cash participation) ####1.4.1.3 Technical survey and development of the detailed engineering 2 months design (DED) ####1.4.1.4 Provide O&M training covering management, technical and 1 month financial skills required for system sustainability ####1.4.1.5 Water quality monitoring to increase awareness of the community Intermitent on the impactofsafe water supply and good practice for storage and handling of drinking water ####1.4.2 Implementation of Physical Works ####1.4.2.1 Procurement of goods and equipment needed for construction; 1 month ####1.4.2.2 Develop construction schedule and labor management plan, 1 month including identification of external skilled labor and civil works ####1.4.2.3 Construction (contractor/communities) Interment ####1.4.2.4 Supervision and quality control Interment ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Implementation Support and Project Management ####1.5.2 Conduct baseline and impact evaluation Study for included districts 3 months (social, health, institutional) ####1.5.3 Prepare procedure and mechanism for monitoring and evaluation 3 months ####1.5.4 Implementation Monitoring & Evaluation project Intermitent ####1.5.5 Implement MIS (from Pamsimas) 3 months ####1.5.6 Provide on the job training for MIS Intermitent ####1.5.7 Update and maintain MIS Intermitent
Page 4
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 2.6 - Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading Bandung Water Sources
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 Half 1, 2013 Half 2, 2013 Duration J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 18 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 2.6 : Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of 18 months Bandung Water Sources MFF P1 Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum - Ministry of Public Works 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 9 months 3 1.1.1 Procurement of consultants 9 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1: Survey and Investigations 6 months 5 1.3 Main Activity 2 : Water Options Modelling 6 months
6 1.4 Main Activity 3: Structure Design 10 months 7 1.5 Main Activity 4: BoQs 4 months 8 1.6 Main Activity 5: Tendering main packages preparation 4 months 9 1.7 Main Activity 7 : Safeguards Implementation 9 months ####1.7.1 Prepare AMDAL for the Main Works 6 months ####1.7.2 Environmental Management Plan Implementation intermitent ####1.7.3 Support for the Resettlement Plan Implementation intermitent
####1.8 Main Activity 8 : Community Empowernment ####1.8.1 Coordination and support for existing local government community intermitent empowerment program
Page 1
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 3.1 - Development of Key Policies and Strategies for Water Resources Management in CRB (TA B3)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 14 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 3.1 : Development of Key Policies and Strategies for 14 months IWRM TA Project 1 BBWS Citarum - MoPW 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Development and implementation of a water entitlements and licensing system for surface water users 5 1.2.1 Review of existing governmental policies and regulations regarding 3 months allocation of water entitlements to surface water users, and systems for water user registration and licensing 6 1.2.2 Review of international best practice regarding allocation of water 3 months entitlements to surface water users, and systems for water user registration and licensing 7 1.2.3 Development of a recommended policy for allocation of water 4 months entitlements to agricultural users and licensing of users to manage those entitlements 8 1.2.4 Development of a system for registration of water users, licensing of 4 months those users, and managing compliance with licence conditions 9 1.2.5 Formulation of an implementation plan for the implementation of the intermitent recommended system ####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Policy development for appropriate water pricing, water allocation and balanced stakeholder participation ####1.3.1 Review of existing governmental policies and regulations regarding 3 months water allocation among uses and water pricing ####1.3.2 Review of international best practice regarding water allocation 3 months among uses and water pricing ####1.3.3 Developmentofa recommended policy for water pricing for uses of 4 months water including domestic, industrial and agricultural ####1.3.4 Development of a recommended policy for water allocation among 4 months competing uses of water, including during times of water shortage ####1.3.5 Development of a recommended strategy for balanced stakeholder 4 months participation in decisions related to water allocation among uses and water pricing; and ####1.3.6 Formulation of an implementation plan for approved policy for water 4 months allocation among competing uses of water, and strategy for balanced stakeholder participation ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Development of strategies and options for demand management and water conservation with respect to ####1.4.1 Reviewof existing strategies and options for demand management 3 months and water conservation with respect to agricultural, industrial and domestic use ####1.4.2 Review of international best practice regarding demand management 3 months and water conservation ####1.4.3 Developmentofa recommended newstrategy for demand 4 months management and water conservation with respect to agricultural, industrial and domestic use
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D ####1.4.4 Formulation of an implementation plan for strategy for demand 4 months management and water conservation with respect to agricultural, industrial and domestic use
Page 2
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 4.1 - Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Duration J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 24 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 4.1 : Development and Implementation of a Basin River 24 months Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans MFF P1 - Ministry of 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Advance Procurement 9 months 4 1.2 PART A - Main Activity 1: Preparation of Basin-Wide River Quality Improvement Strategy 5 1.2.1 Establish Stakeholder Forums intermitent 6 1.2.2 Reviewcurrent policies , information systems, decision systems and 1 months financing to WQ in CRB 7 1.2.3 Policy study and provide recommendations on the use of 1 months incentives/pollution charges for water quality management, including 8 1.2.4 Assess performance and effectiveness of existing cooperation based 1 months programs and identify complementary regulatory measures within the 9 1.2.5 Reviewcurrent WQ data collection systems, WQ data analysis systems 1 months and River Basin WQ modeling capacities ofWater Management, R&D 10 1.2.6 Development of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) 1 months 11 1.2.7 Prepare guidelines/procedures for establishing institutional mechanism 1 months to manage water quality 12 1.2.8 Prepare guidelines/procedures for assessment of pollution sources, 1 months delineating water quality management areas and prepare action plans 13 1.2.9 Prepare strategic options for river water quality improvement including 1 months technical, institutional and legal aspects 14 1.2.10 Design and develop a basin-wide water quality monitoring strategy 1 months 15 1.3 PART B - Main Activity 2: Improvements to Water Quality Monitoring and Data Management 16 1.3.1 Review the existing water quality information system and available data 2 months 17 1.3.2 Design and develop a water quality and pollution database 6 months management system, with capability for mapping pollution sources 18 1.3.3 Design and develop an internet-based WQM information system to link 3 months the district enviroment agencies with other key agencies 19 1.3.4 Data collection and data entry for the detailed Mapping of Citarum River intermittent from upstream to downstream, including Physical measurement of Citarum river on monitoring site point(width and depth, slope, side and 20 1.3.5 Implementation of water quality information system for Citarum Basin intermittent WR management on job training 21 1.3.6 Develop a setofcosted WQ improvementscenarios for discussions 2 months with planners 22 1.3.7 Update WQ model and finalise runs for CRB WQ Action Plans 2 months 23 1.3.8 Implement an integrated water quality and quantity monitoring and intermittent reporting system based on action plans (which identify priority pollutants, sources, control measures, targets) 24 1.3.9 Compile and integrate water quality and quantity data from environment intermittent agencies
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Duration J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J 25 1.3.10 Design and develop a basin-wide information campaign for raising 2 months public awareness of water quality management issues 26 1.3.11 Implementation of water quality management campaign 12 months 27 1.4 Main Activity 3 : Strengthening of Organisational Capacity 28 1.4.1 Coordination among agencies for water quality management intermittent
29 1.4.2 Design and implementa training program on the various guidelines for 3 months district environment protection agencies 30 1.5 Main Activity 4 : Preparation and Implementation of Area-Based Pollution Sources Management Action Plans 31 1.5.1 Conduct pollution sources inventories and pollution load assessment in 3 months key water quality management areas 32 1.5.2 Identify stakeholders (including universities and research organizations) 1 months and conduct a survey of technical knowledge and capabilities 33 1.5.3 Identify opportunities for involvement of universities and research 1 months organizations to participate in the development and implementation of 34 1.5.4 Develop a basin wide River Quality Improvementstrategy for basin as a 1 months framework for action planning in priority water quality management 35 1.5.5 Policy review and re-planning 2 months 36 1.5.6 Formulate the water quality management action plans combining 1 months cooperation and regulation 37 1.5.7 Identify specific initiative for Private Sector involvement 1 months 38 1.5.8 Identify activities suitable for CSR 1 months 39 1.5.9 Identify Large scale Biogas Plant Projects for GOI investment 1 months 40 1.6 Main Activity 5 : Initial Implementation of Citarum River WQ Improvements 41 1.6.1 Initial implementation of Citarum River water quality improvement 3 months 42 1.6.2 Develop shallowand infiltration well (at household and office scale) and 14 months pore infiltration well in the upper Citarum river basin 43 1.6.3 Identification of Offices and Factories to participate under CSR initiative 15 months 44 1.6.4 Develop biogas plant/installation in CRB 15 months 45 1.6.5 Implement garbage management by 3-R concept 15 months (reduce-reuse-recycle), composting, garbage cut-off, provide garbage 46 1.6.6 River bank garden improvement(along the river in the upper Citarum 15 months river basin) 47 1.6.7 Develop Communal septic tank and WC Communal atupper site CRB 15 months 48 1.6.8 Roll out an awarness campaign for rehabilitation/reforestation of the CRB 15 months critical land 49 1.6.9 Develop pilot Garbage Trapping at upper site CRB 15 months 50 1.6.10 Awarness campaign for Rehabilitasi/Penghijauan di Daerah Tangkapan 15 months Air (Catchment Area) dan lahan kritis DAS Citarum 51 1.7 Main Activity 6 : Knowledge Dissemination
52 1.7.1 Preparation of knowledge products 4 months 53 1.7.2 Media dissemination of WQ enhancement projects intermittent
Page 2 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Duration J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J 54 1.7.3 Schools information program intermittent
55 1.7.4 CSR information dissemination program intermittent
56 1.7.5 CSO awareness and knowledge building intermittent
57 1.7.6 Workshops and Training Participation Nationally intermittent
58 1.7.7 R&D knowledge products dissemination within the basin intermittent
59 1.8 Main Activity 7 : Monitoring and evaluation
Page 3
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 5.1 - Upper Citarum Basin Flood Management (TA C1)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 15 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 5.1 : Upper Citarum Basin Flood Management TA 15 months 7189 RCWR - MoPW 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Completion of Current River Model Studies 1D 5 1.2.1 Topographical Survey at The Selected Location 3 months 6 1.2.2 Modelling and Calibration 1D 4 months 7 1.2.3 Flood Routing of Small Dam and Sediment Trap 3 months 8 1.2.4 Concept design of Floodway Options 3 months 9 1.2.5 Concept Design of Polder System 2 months ####1.2.6 Deep Recharge Well Prototype 2 months ####1.2.7 Prepare ToR for FS and Preparation Studies 1 month ####1.2.8 Prepare Prefeasibillity Report 2 months ####1.2.9 Study Report and Meeting for FS 2 months ####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Prepare for Floodplain Modelling Studies ####1.3.1 Topographic Surveys 3 months ####1.3.2 Sediment Studies 3 months ####1.3.3 Geological Site Investigation 2 months ####1.3.4 Survey Investigation 2 months ####1.3.5 Survey Investigation (SI) and Topographical Survey for Pilot Polder 2 months Design ####1.3.6 Social Surveys 2 months ####1.3.7 Hydrology Data Collecting and Analysis 3 months ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Floodplain Modelling Studies and Floodplain 2D ####1.4.1 Modelling and Calibration 2D 4 months ####1.4.2 Design Studies with Modelling 3 months ####1.4.3 Upper Tributary and Groundwater Conservation 3 months ####1.4.4 Update Flood and Management Strategy 3 months ####1.4.5 impact on Regional and Spatial Planning 2 months ####1.4.6 Operation and Maintenance Operational Plan 2 months ####1.4.7 Prepare ToR for Detailed Design by Others 1 month ####1.4.8 Prepare Stage 2 Report 1 month
Page 1
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 5.2 – Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation (TA E1)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 24 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 5.2 : Climate Change Adaption and Mitigation in the 24 months 6 Ci's River Basin Territory TA 7189 DWRM - MoPW 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Formulation of climate change adaptation and mitigation policies to be adopted within the river basin 5 1.2.1 Review and development of modelling and statistical projections, and 3 months estimate the probability of hazardous climate events occurring specifically in CRB 6 1.2.2 Identify the potential vulnerabilities and risks of the CRB (and in 3 months particular its water resources system) to climate, and their significance in relation to other factors of uncertainty such as population growth and economic development 7 1.2.3 Review of current national policies and undertake assessments of CC 4 months capacities of organizations within CRB 8 1.2.4 Prepare broad sector guidelines for mitigation and adaptation, 5 months covering implications for infrastructure (urban and rural), land use and ecosystem management and economic development, poverty reduction, and social dimensions 9 1.2.5 Formulate a climate risk management strategy for the CRB 3 months ####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Mainstreaming of climate change concerns in at local development planning, sector, and program level ####1.3.1 Preparation of guidelines for mainstreaming climate change at both 3 months policy and operational levels within the CRB ####1.3.2 Preparation of a booklet “Summary for Policy and Decision Makers” 1 month on mainstreaming climate risk management in CRB development plans (including budgetary and fiscal planning) ####1.3.3 Conduct meetings and workshops with local Government partners to intermitent disseminate the results of climate change adaptation and mitigation (CCAM) policies and discuss their relevance to current situations ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Preparation of adaptation and mitigation action plans (AMAP) ####1.4.1 Preparation of adaptation and mitigation action plans (including plans 6 months for carbon sequestration in the upper partofthe basin through afforestation and reforestation, biofuel and biogas development, wastewater and solid waste management, capacity enhance ####1.4.2 Identify potential pilot activities, including stakeholder participation and 6 months community empowerment through partnership approaches with local agencies, communities and the private sector ####1.4.3 Prepare applications for other climate change funds (both within and 3 months outside ADB) including design, application, selection, supervision, and monitoring, in close coordination with the selected entities ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Recommendations and inputs for the other components of the ICWRMIP ####1.5.12 Preparation of guidelines for “climate-proofing” of the Roadmap 4 months
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D ####1.5.13 Update the Citarum Roadmap to be consistent with the climate risk 4 months management strategy (“climate-proofing” the Roadmap ####1.5.14 Integrate identified measures location and information into the intermitent Roadmap Information System
Page 2
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 7.1 - Decision Support System for Integrated Water Resources Management in Citarum River Basin (TA D1)
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated Half 2, 2008 Half 1, 2009 Half 2, 2009 Half 1, 2010 Half 2, 2010 Half 1, 2011 Half 2, 2011 Half 1, 2012 Half 2, 2012 Duration J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 36 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 7.1 : Decision Support System for IWRM in Citarum 36 months River Basin TA 7189 DWRM - MoPW 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 ADB procurement of consultants 4 1.2 Main Activity 1 : Data Collection 5 1.2.1 Surface and groundwater quantity and quality 3 months 6 1.2.2 Other natural resources data, such as soils, geology, land cover, 3 months ecosystems and so on 7 1.2.3 Socio-economic data, such as population, poverty, land use, and so 3 months on 8 1.3 Main Activity 2 : Data archiving and management 9 1.3.1 Collection of data from various sources, validation, computerization, 4 months and so on ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Data sharing and dissemination among government agencies ####1.4.1 Research establishments intermitent ####1.4.2 Providing public access to data intermitent
Page 1
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 8.1 - Program Management
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Duration Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 51 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 8.1 : Program Management MFF P1 Balai Besar 51 months Wilayah Sungai Citarum - Ministry of Public Works 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Advance procurement of consultants 9 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1: Coordination and planning among component projects (integrated short and long term AWP) 5 1.2.1 Define the task of each project implementing agencies and their 3 months consultants to avoid duplication of activities and function 6 1.2.2 Coordinate with RCMU the coordination among sectors at national, 3 months provincial and district levels (vertical and horizontal integration of 7 1.2.3 Provide guidance for project management, performance 3 months management using modern practices for quality management and 8 1.2.4 Develop appropriate office working procedures leading to the writing of 3 months the Office Procedures Manual 9 1.2.5 Prepare budgets for each activity within each component and 3 months category based on the agreed loan allocation ####1.2.6 Assistance to Project 1 (MoA/MoH/MoE) PIUs during Year 1 12 months implementation in establishment of management systems, technical (intermitent) support, initiation of activities and procurement ####1.2.7 Support the PCMU and its secretariat operation including preparation 51 months of issues papers for meetings and followup action after (intermitent) ####1.2.8 Preparation of Annual Work Program for PCMU activities 3 months/year (intermitent) ####1.2.9 Collect and consolidate the Annual Work Program from all PIUs 3 months/year (intermitent) ####1.2.10 Assist in implementation of PCMU's AWP (intermittent) 51 months (intermitent) ####1.2.11 Attend the meetings related to implementation of ICWRMIP Project I 51 months (intermittent) (intermitent) ####1.2.12 Facilitate coordination and cooperation among the implementing 51 months agencies (intermittent) (intermitent) ####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Data and Information Systems
####1.3.1 Collect project related data including base maps, project locations and 3 months related informations from PIUs, CSOs and private sector (CSR) ####1.3.2 Collect spatial planning data from related institutions 3 months ####1.3.3 Compile and standardize collected data into a geographic database 3 months ####1.3.4 Design a dedicated interface for data entry and projects monitoring 6 months ####1.3.5 Prepare metadabase for all integrated data 6 months ####1.3.6 Design a dedicated web based system for data dissemination 6 months ####1.3.7 Provide training on information system to PIUs 1 month
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Duration Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ####1.3.8 On going updating of the projects GIS based database 42 months (intermitent) ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Monitoring and evaluation of projects (Project 1) performance, including financial management (PCMU) ####1.4.1 Prepare and maintain a performance monitoring and evaluation 3 months mechanism for the component projects, including financial ####1.4.2 Develop a Document Control System DCS 3 months ####1.4.3 Develop a Quality ManagementSystem QMM 3 months ####1.4.4 Provide training on PPMS, DCS and QMM to PIUs 1 month ####1.4.5 Monitor the financial and physical progress related to agreed 42 months implementation targets (quarterly) (intermitent) ####1.4.6 Identify problems and constraints which affect the implementation of all 42 months project components financed under ICWRMIP Project I and feedback, (intermitent) hold dialogue and enhance implementation based on lessons learned from the M&E program ####1.4.7 Prepare relevant progress reports for submission to the ADB 42 months (intermitent) ####1.4.8 Monitor and reportdisbursementstatus ofthe loan proceed in closed 42 months coordination with the MOF and the concerned IAs to assistin solving (intermitent) the backlog ofpaymentfrom the load proceed ####1.4.9 Prepare report for each components for coordination among 42 months implementing agencies (intermitent) ####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Social and environment safeguards oversight (PCMU) ####1.5.1 Dissemination of safeguards frameworks (resettlement and 3 months environmental) to PIUs ####1.5.2 Monitor social and environment implementation related to agreed 42 months safeguard frameworks (intermitent) ####1.5.3 Provide oversight and assistance in Project implementation of 42 months safeguard policy, specifically ensuring quality in compliance with (intermitent) implementation of Resettlement plans, IEE/EIAs in a timely way. ####1.5.4 Coordinate and ensure adequate and timely funding for safeguard 42 months implementation (intermitent) ####1.5.5 Ensure full disclosure to stakeholders of documents and related 42 months activities related to safeguards (intermitent) ####1.6 Main Activity 5 : Media communication plan, information dissemination and implementation (intermittent) ####1.6.1 Prepare media communication plan in collaboration with RCMU 3 months related to ICWRMIP Project I implementation ####1.6.2 Information dissemination (intermittent) 42 months (intermitent) ####1.7 Main Activity 6 : Quality Control and Quality Assurance Systems
Page 2 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Duration Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ####1.7.1 Implement in PCMU and support PIUs implementation of 6 months performance management using modern practices for quality management and document control including Office Procedures Manual. OPM and Document Control System DCS Quality ####1.7.2 Support and monitor full adherence to Program Administration 42 months Memorandum PAM Program Performance Monitoring and Reporting (intermitent) ####1.7.3 Quarterly Reporting on Procurement Status in accordance with 42 months Procurement Implementation Schedules (intermitent) ####1.7.4 Provision of oversight monitoring and evaluation of Results Based 42 months Outputs QC/QA activities on Program Services, assess value of (intermitent) outputs for given inputs and build lessons learned into newactivities and ongoing programs. ####1.7.5 Provision of oversight monitoring and evaluation of Results Based 42 months Outputs QC/QA activities on physical works assess value of outputs for (intermitent) given inputs and build lessons learned into newactivities and ongoing ####1.7.6 Periodic Reviewand update QC/QA and Program implementation 42 months documents (PAM/PPMS) (intermitent)
Page 3
Supplementary Appendix 4 - Detailed Activities and Schedule for Sub Component 8.2 - Independent Monitoring and Evaluation
Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Duration Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 0 Project 1 and Parallel Financed Activities 60 months (excluding Procurement) 1 1 Sub Component 8.2 : Independent Monitoring and 60 months Evaluation MFF P1 Road Map Coordination (intermitent) 2 1.1 Procurement of Consultants 3 1.1.1 Advance procurement of consultants 9 months 4 1.2 Main Activity 1: Establishing a RPMS for the overall Roadmap investments
5 1.2.1 Review of the exisiting PPMS from each PIUs 1 month
6 1.2.2 Define the monitoring and evaluation performance 2 months benchmark and indicators 7 1.2.3 Design the RPMS in line with available PPMS and 3 months performance indicators 8 1.2.4 Develop the RPMS software and manual 3 months
9 1.2.5 Provide training to RCMU staff and socialize it with 1 month related agencies ####1.3 Main Activity 2 : Monitor the Roadmap’s social, environmental, and economic impacts, including the establishment of benchmark using existing ####1.3.1 Collect existing government information and data 3 months systems social, environmental, and economic ####1.3.2 Establish social, environmental, and economic 3 months impacts benchmarks ####1.3.3 Standardize benchmarking indicators and socialize it 2 months to related PIUs ####1.4 Main Activity 3 : Develop a mechanism for making necessary adjustments in the Roadmap design and ####1.4.1 Identify problems and constraints which affect the 2 months implementation of all project components financed ####1.4.2 Prepare a mechanism guideline for making 2 months adjustments on the roadmap design and ####1.4.3 Socialize the guideline to related PIUs and users 1 month
####1.5 Main Activity 4 : Monitor the Roadmap physical and financial processes as well as the effectiveness and efficiency in achieving major ####1.5.1 Monitor the financial and physical progress related to intermitent agreed implementation targets (quarterly) ####1.5.2 Identify problems and constraints which affect the intermitent implementation of all project components financed under the Roadmap and feedback, hold dialogue
Page 1 Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program - Project 1 ID WBS Task Name Estimated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Duration Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ####1.5.3 Prepare relevant progress reports for submission to intermitent the GOI ####1.5.4 Monitor and report disbursement status of the funds in intermitent closed coordination with the MOF and the concerned IAs to assistin solving the backlog offunds proceeds ####1.5.5 Prepare report for each components for coordination intermitent among implementing agencies ####1.5.6 Monitor the financial and physical progress related to intermitent agreed implementation targets (quarterly) ####1.5.7 Identify problems and constraints which affect the intermitent implementation of all project components financed under the Roadmap and feedback, hold dialogue and enhance implementation based on lessons
Page 2
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Components (Costab Ouputs)
1.1 - Roadmap Management 2.1 - West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation Project 2.2 - Improved Land and Water Management 2.3 - Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation 2.6 - Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading Bandung Water Sources 4.1 - Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans 8.1 - Program Management 8.2 - Independent Monitoring and Evaluation
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 1.1 - Roadmap Management (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indoesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 1. 1.1. Roadmap Management Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Co-TL IWRM Planning Programming Specialist man-month 3 12 9 -- 24 194,370,000 20,900 62.700 250.800 188.100 - - 501.600 Environment Financing Specialist man-month - 3 - -- 3 179,025,000 19,250 - 57.750 - - - 57.750 WR-PPP Specialist man-month - 3 - -- 3 179,025,000 19,250 - 57.750 - - - 57.750 Subtotal International Professional Staffs 62.700 366.300 188.100 - - 617.100 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/IWRM Specialist man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 20,971,500 2,255 6.765 27.060 27.060 20.295 - 81.180 Co-TL/IWRM Planning and Programming Specialist man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 18,414,000 1,980 5.940 23.760 23.760 17.820 - 71.280 GIS/Database Management Specialist man-month 3 12 9 -- 24 18,414,000 1,980 5.940 23.760 17.820 - - 47.520 WR Public Private Partnership Specialist man-month - 6 6 -- 12 16,879,500 1,815 - 10.890 10.890 - - 21.780 WR Investment Program/Economist Specialist man-month 3 12 9 -- 24 16,879,500 1,815 5.445 21.780 16.335 - - 43.560 Prov./District Planning and Programming Specialist man-month 3 12 9 -- 24 16,879,500 1,815 5.445 21.780 16.335 - - 43.560 CSO Coordination Specialists /a man-month 6 24 24 18 - 72 16,879,500 1,815 10.890 43.560 43.560 32.670 - 130.680 CSR Fund-raising Specialist man-month - 6 6 -- 12 16,879,500 1,815 - 10.890 10.890 - - 21.780 Information and Communication Specialist man-month 3 12 9 -- 24 16,879,500 1,815 5.445 21.780 16.335 - - 43.560 Junior IWRM Specialists /b man-month 6 24 24 18 - 72 5,115,000 550 3.300 13.200 13.200 9.900 - 39.600 Junior GIS Specialist man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 5,115,000 550 1.650 6.600 6.600 4.950 - 19.800 Junior QA Specialist man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 5,115,000 550 1.650 6.600 6.600 4.950 - 19.800 Junior CSO Coordination Specialists /c man-month 6 24 24 18 - 72 4,603,500 495 2.970 11.880 11.880 8.910 - 35.640 Junior Information & Communication Specialists /d man-month 6 24 24 18 - 72 4,603,500 495 2.970 11.880 11.880 8.910 - 35.640 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 58.410 255.420 233.145 108.405 - 655.380 Subtotal Remuneration 121.110 621.720 421.245 108.405 - 1.272.480 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips 1 4 1 -- 6 30,699,000 3,301 3.301 13.204 3.301 - - 19.806 OSA and Housing days 90 540 270 -- 900 1,125,300 121 10.890 65.340 32.670 - - 108.900 NPS Housing months 48 204 192 108 - 552 1,278,750 138 6.600 28.050 26.400 14.850 - 75.900 Supporting Staffs /e mm 12 48 48 36 - 144 4,092,000 440 5.280 21.120 21.120 15.840 - 63.360 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost ets months 3 12 12 9 - 36 16,879,500 1,815 5.445 21.780 21.780 16.335 - 65.340 Office Furniture and Equipment package 1 - - -- 1 187,209,000 20,130 20.130 - - - - 20.130 Transport months 6 24 24 18 - 72 10,230,000 1,100 6.600 26.400 26.400 19.800 - 79.200 Reporting times 1 6 6 8 - 21 3,375,900 363 363 2.178 2.178 2.904 - 7.623 Out-of-station and Various Costs months 3 12 12 9 - 36 9,718,500 1,045 3.135 12.540 12.540 9.405 - 37.620 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 61.744 190.612 146.389 79.134 - 477.879 3. Sub-contract a. Minor Studies Study Report on Proposed ICWRMIP Phase 2 package - 1 - -- 1 511,500,000 55,000 - 55.000 - - - 55.000 Study Report on Private Sector Investment Opportunity in CRB package - 1 - -- 1 511,500,000 55,000 - 55.000 - - - 55.000 Study Report on Community-based Project Development in CRB package - 1 - -- 1 511,500,000 55,000 - 55.000 - - - 55.000 Study Report on Environmental Services Sustainable Financing in CRB package - 1 - -- 1 511,500,000 55,000 - 55.000 - - - 55.000 Subtotal Minor Studies - 220.000 - - - 220.000 Subtotal Consulting Services 182.854 1.032.332 567.634 187.539 - 1.970.359 B. Socialization and Community Development 1. Program Material Development lump-sum 1 - - -- 1 204,600,000 22,000 22.000 - - - - 22.000 2. Program Material Campaign and Implementation lump-sum 1 8 8 3 - 20 30,690,000 3,300 3.300 26.400 26.400 9.900 - 66.000 3. Workshop Related to PPP times - 4 4 2 - 10 20,460,000 2,200 - 8.800 8.800 4.400 - 22.000 Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 25.300 35.200 35.200 14.300 - 110.000 C. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting times 1 3 3 3 - 10 15,400,000 1,656 1.656 4.968 4.968 4.968 - 16.559 2. District Consinyering /f times 3 12 12 12 - 39 9,900,000 1,065 3.194 12.774 12.774 12.774 - 41.516 3. Communities Consinyering /g times 5 30 30 25 - 90 3,300,000 355 1.774 10.645 10.645 8.871 - 31.935 4. National/Provincial Workshop /h times 1 1 1 -- 3 55,000,000 5,914 5.914 5.914 5.914 - - 17.742 5. District Workshop /i times 5 5 5 -- 15 18,700,000 2,011 10.054 10.054 10.054 - - 30.161 Subtotal Project Coordination and Management 22.591 44.355 44.355 26.613 - 137.914 D. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Financial Staffs KPA - RCMU man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 4,000,000 430 1.290 5.161 5.161 3.871 - 15.484 Koordinator Sekretariat RCMU /j man-month 9 36 36 27 - 108 2,800,000 301 2.710 10.839 10.839 8.129 - 32.516 PIU - RCMU man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 3,200,000 344 1.032 4.129 4.129 3.097 - 12.387 Treasury man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 2,900,000 312 935 3.742 3.742 2.806 - 11.226 Administrative Assistant man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 2.710 - 10.839 Technical Assistant man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 2.710 - 10.839 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 1,800,000 194 581 2.323 2.323 1.742 - 6.968 PPK man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 3,050,000 328 984 3.935 3.935 2.952 - 11.806 Pelaksana Administrasi man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.710 2.032 - 8.129 Pelaksana Teknik man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.710 2.032 - 8.129 Counterparts /k man-month 12 48 48 36 - 144 1,900,000 204 2.452 9.806 9.806 7.355 - 29.419 Subtotal Salaries for Financial Staffs 13.145 52.581 52.581 39.435 - 157.742 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 3,720,000 400 1.200 4.800 4.800 3.600 - 14.400 Computer Operator man-month 3 12 12 9 - 36 3,720,000 400 1.200 4.800 4.800 3.600 - 14.400 Office Boy and Security /l man-month 6 24 24 18 - 72 1,500,000 161 968 3.871 3.871 2.903 - 11.613 Subtotal Secretariat 3.368 13.471 13.471 10.103 - 40.413 3. Transport months 3 12 12 9 - 36 9,300,000 1,000 3.000 12.000 12.000 9.000 - 36.000 4. Procurement package 1 - - -- 1 93,000,000 10,000 10.000 - - - - 10.000 5. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months 3 12 12 9 - 36 55,800,000 6,000 18.000 72.000 72.000 54.000 - 216.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support 47.513 150.052 150.052 112.539 - 460.155 278.258 1.261.938 797.240 340.991 - 2.678.428
Remarks: a 2 persons, b 2 personns, c 2 persons, d 2 persons, e 4 persons, f 4 times/year x 1 day x 30 persons, g 6 times/year/district x 1 day x 30 persons, h 2 times/year x 2 days x 30 persons, i 2 times/year x 2 days x 30 persons, j 3 persons, k persons (1 in provincial bappeda), l 2 persons Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indoesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 1. 1.1. Roadmap Management Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule
I. Investment Costs A. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Co-TL IWRM Planning Programming Specialist 66.757 272.338 206.704 - - 545.799 491.219 - 54.580 545.799 5,0 90,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Environment Financing Specialist - 62.709 - - - 62.709 56.438 - 6.271 62.709 5,0 90,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) WR-PPP Specialist - 62.709 - - - 62.709 56.438 - 6.271 62.709 5,0 90,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal International Professional Staffs 66.757 397.757 206.704 - - 671.218 604.096 - 67.122 671.218 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/IWRM Specialist 7.334 31.092 32.802 25.955 - 97.183 - 87.464 9.718 97.183 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Co-TL/IWRM Planning and Programming Specialist 6.440 27.300 28.802 22.789 - 85.331 - 76.798 8.533 85.331 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) GIS/Database Management Specialist 6.440 27.300 21.601 - - 55.341 - 49.807 5.534 55.341 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) WR Public Private Partnership Specialist - 12.513 13.201 - - 25.713 - 23.142 2.571 25.713 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) WR Investment Program/Economist Specialist 5.903 25.025 19.801 - - 50.730 - 45.657 5.073 50.730 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Prov./District Planning and Programming Specialist 5.903 25.025 19.801 - - 50.730 - 45.657 5.073 50.730 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) CSO Coordination Specialists /a 11.806 50.051 52.803 41.781 - 156.441 - 140.796 15.644 156.441 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) CSR Fund-raising Specialist - 12.513 13.201 - - 25.713 - 23.142 2.571 25.713 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Information and Communication Specialist 5.903 25.025 19.801 - - 50.730 - 45.657 5.073 50.730 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Junior IWRM Specialists /b 3.578 15.167 16.001 12.661 - 47.406 - 42.666 4.741 47.406 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Junior GIS Specialist 1.789 7.583 8.001 6.330 - 23.703 - 21.333 2.370 23.703 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Junior QA Specialist 1.789 7.583 8.001 6.330 - 23.703 - 21.333 2.370 23.703 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Junior CSO Coordination Specialists /c 3.220 13.650 14.401 11.395 - 42.666 - 38.399 4.267 42.666 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Junior Information & Communication Specialists /d 3.220 13.650 14.401 11.395 - 42.666 - 38.399 4.267 42.666 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal National Professional Staffs 63.324 293.478 282.618 138.636 - 778.055 - 700.250 77.806 778.055 Subtotal Remuneration 130.080 691.235 489.322 138.636 - 1.449.273 604.096 700.250 144.927 1.449.273 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel 3.515 14.338 3.627 - - 21.480 19.332 - 2.148 21.480 5,0 90,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) OSA and Housing 11.806 75.076 39.602 - - 126.484 - 113.836 12.648 126.484 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) NPS Housing 7.155 32.230 32.002 18.991 - 90.378 - 81.340 9.038 90.378 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Supporting Staffs /e 5.724 24.267 25.602 20.257 - 75.850 - 68.265 7.585 75.850 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost ets 5.903 25.025 26.402 20.890 - 78.220 - 70.398 7.822 78.220 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Office Furniture and Equipment 21.823 - - - - 21.823 - 19.641 2.182 21.823 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Transport 7.155 30.334 32.002 25.322 - 94.812 - 85.331 9.481 94.812 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Reporting 394 2.503 2.640 3.714 - 9.250 - 8.325 925 9.250 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Out-of-station and Various Costs 3.399 14.408 15.201 12.028 - 45.036 - 40.532 4.504 45.036 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 66.874 218.180 177.078 101.202 - 563.334 19.332 487.669 56.333 563.334 3. Sub-contract a. Minor Studies Study Report on Proposed ICWRMIP Phase 2 - 63.195 - - - 63.195 - 56.876 6.320 63.195 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Study Report on Private Sector Investment Opportunity in CRB - 63.195 - - - 63.195 - 56.876 6.320 63.195 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Study Report on Community-based Project Development in CRB - 63.195 - - - 63.195 - 56.876 6.320 63.195 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Study Report on Environmental Services Sustainable Financing in CRB - 63.195 - - - 63.195 - 56.876 6.320 63.195 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal Minor Studies - 252.780 - - - 252.780 - 227.502 25.278 252.780 Subtotal Consulting Services 196.954 1.162.195 666.400 239.838 - 2.265.387 623.428 1.415.421 226.539 2.265.387 B. Socialization and Community Development 1. Program Material Development 23.851 - - - - 23.851 - 21.466 2.385 23.851 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) 2. Program Material Campaign and Implementation 3.578 30.334 32.002 12.661 - 78.574 - 70.717 7.857 78.574 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) 3. Workshop Related to PPP - 10.111 10.667 5.627 - 26.406 - 23.765 2.641 26.406 5,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 27.428 40.445 42.669 18.288 - 128.830 - 115.947 12.883 128.830 C. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting 1.710 5.436 5.735 6.051 - 18.932 - 17.038 1.893 18.932 0,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 2. District Consinyering /f 3.297 13.979 14.747 15.559 - 47.582 - 42.824 4.758 47.582 0,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 3. Communities Consinyering /g 1.832 11.649 12.290 10.805 - 36.575 - 32.917 3.657 36.575 0,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 4. National/Provincial Workshop /h 6.106 6.472 6.828 - - 19.405 - 17.465 1.941 19.405 0,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 5. District Workshop /i 10.381 11.002 11.607 - - 32.989 - 29.690 3.299 32.989 0,0 0,0 10,0 RM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal Project Coordination and Management 23.326 48.537 51.206 32.414 - 155.483 - 139.934 15.548 155.483 D. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Financial Staffs KPA - RCMU 1.332 5.648 5.959 4.715 - 17.653 - 17.653 - 17.653 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Koordinator Sekretariat RCMU /j 2.798 11.861 12.513 9.901 - 37.072 - 37.072 - 37.072 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT PIU - RCMU 1.066 4.518 4.767 3.772 - 14.123 - 14.123 - 14.123 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Treasury 966 4.095 4.320 3.418 - 12.799 - 12.799 - 12.799 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Administrative Assistant 933 3.954 4.171 3.300 - 12.357 - 12.357 - 12.357 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Technical Assistant 933 3.954 4.171 3.300 - 12.357 - 12.357 - 12.357 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc 600 2.542 2.681 2.122 - 7.944 - 7.944 - 7.944 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT PPK 1.016 4.307 4.543 3.595 - 13.461 - 13.461 - 13.461 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Pelaksana Administrasi 699 2.965 3.128 2.475 - 9.268 - 9.268 - 9.268 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Pelaksana Teknik 699 2.965 3.128 2.475 - 9.268 - 9.268 - 9.268 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Counterparts /k 2.531 10.731 11.321 8.958 - 33.542 - 33.542 - 33.542 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Subtotal Salaries for Financial Staffs 13.572 57.538 60.703 48.031 - 179.845 - 179.845 - 179.845 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager 1.239 5.253 5.541 4.385 - 16.418 - 16.418 - 16.418 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Computer Operator 1.239 5.253 5.541 4.385 - 16.418 - 16.418 - 16.418 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Office Boy and Security /l 999 4.236 4.469 3.536 - 13.240 - 13.240 - 13.240 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Subtotal Secretariat 3.477 14.741 15.552 12.305 - 46.076 - 46.076 - 46.076 3. Transport 3.098 13.131 13.854 10.962 - 41.044 - 41.044 - 41.044 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT 4. Procurement 10.325 - - - - 10.325 - 10.325 - 10.325 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT 5. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc 18.585 78.789 83.122 65.770 - 246.266 - 246.266 - 246.266 0,0 0,0 0,0 RM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Subtotal Project Administration Support 49.057 164.200 173.231 137.069 - 523.556 - 523.556 - 523.556 296.766 1.415.376 933.507 427.608 - 3.073.256 623.428 2.194.859 254.970 3.073.256
Remarks: a 2 persons, b 2 personns, c 2 persons, d 2 persons, e 4 persons, f 4 times/year x 1 day x 30 persons, g 6 times/year/district x 1 day x 30 persons, h 2 times/year x 2 days x 30 persons, i 2 times/year x 2 days x 30 persons, j 3 persons, k persons (1 in provincial bappeda), l 2 persons Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indoesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 1. 1.1. Roadmap Management Other Accounts Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Impl. Proj. Manag. Cost ADB ADF Loan Central Government Agency Area Unit Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Co-TL IWRM Planning Programming Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 54.073 220.594 167.431 - - 442.097 12.684 51.744 39.274 - - 103.702 Environment Financing Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 50.795 - - - 50.795 - 11.915 - - - 11.915 WR-PPP Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 50.795 - - - 50.795 - 11.915 - - - 11.915 Subtotal International Professional Staffs 54.073 322.183 167.431 - - 543.686 12.684 75.574 39.274 - - 127.531 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/IWRM Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 5.941 25.185 26.570 21.023 - 78.718 1.393 5.907 6.232 4.931 - 18.465 Co-TL/IWRM Planning and Programming Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 5.216 22.113 23.329 18.459 - 69.118 1.224 5.187 5.472 4.330 - 16.213 GIS/Database Management Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 5.216 22.113 17.497 - - 44.826 1.224 5.187 4.104 - - 10.515 WR Public Private Partnership Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 10.135 10.693 - - 20.828 - 2.377 2.508 -- 4.886 WR Investment Program/Economist Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 4.781 20.270 16.039 - - 41.091 1.122 4.755 3.762 -- 9.639 Prov./District Planning and Programming Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 4.781 20.270 16.039 - - 41.091 1.122 4.755 3.762 -- 9.639 CSO Coordination Specialists /a RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 9.563 40.541 42.771 33.842 - 126.717 2.243 9.510 10.033 7.938 - 29.724 CSR Fund-raising Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 10.135 10.693 - - 20.828 - 2.377 2.508 -- 4.886 Information and Communication Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 4.781 20.270 16.039 - - 41.091 1.122 4.755 3.762 -- 9.639 Junior IWRM Specialists /b RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.898 12.285 12.961 10.255 - 38.399 680 2.882 3.040 2.406 - 9.007 Junior GIS Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 1.449 6.143 6.480 5.128 - 19.200 340 1.441 1.520 1.203 - 4.504 Junior QA Specialist RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 1.449 6.143 6.480 5.128 - 19.200 340 1.441 1.520 1.203 - 4.504 Junior CSO Coordination Specialists /c RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.608 11.057 11.665 9.230 - 34.559 612 2.594 2.736 2.165 - 8.106 Junior Information & Communication Specialists /d RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.608 11.057 11.665 9.230 - 34.559 612 2.594 2.736 2.165 - 8.106 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 51.292 237.717 228.920 112.295 - 630.225 12.032 55.761 53.697 26.341 - 147.830 Subtotal Remuneration 105.365 559.900 396.351 112.295 - 1.173.911 24.715 131.335 92.971 26.341 - 275.362 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.847 11.614 2.938 - - 17.399 668 2.724 689 -- 4.081 OSA and Housing RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 9.563 60.811 32.078 - - 102.452 2.243 14.264 7.524 - - 24.032 NPS Housing RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 5.796 26.106 25.922 15.383 - 73.206 1.359 6.124 6.080 3.608 - 17.172 Supporting Staffs /e RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 4.637 19.656 20.737 16.408 - 61.438 1.088 4.611 4.864 3.849 - 14.411 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost ets RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 4.781 20.270 21.385 16.921 - 63.358 1.122 4.755 5.016 3.969 - 14.862 Office Furniture and Equipment RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 17.677 - - - - 17.677 4.146 - - -- 4.146 Transport RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 5.796 24.570 25.922 20.510 - 76.798 1.359 5.763 6.080 4.811 - 18.014 Reporting RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 319 2.027 2.139 3.008 - 7.493 75 475 502 706 - 1.758 Out-of-station and Various Costs RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.753 11.671 12.313 9.742 - 36.479 646 2.738 2.888 2.285 - 8.557 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 54.168 176.726 143.433 81.974 - 456.301 12.706 41.454 33.645 19.228 - 107.033 3. Sub-contract a. Minor Studies Study Report on Proposed ICWRMIP Phase 2 RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 51.188 - - - 51.188 - 12.007 - - - 12.007 Study Report on Private Sector Investment Opportunity in CRB RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 51.188 - - - 51.188 - 12.007 - - - 12.007 Study Report on Community-based Project Development in CRB RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 51.188 - - - 51.188 - 12.007 - - - 12.007 Study Report on Environmental Services Sustainable Financing in CRB RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 51.188 - - - 51.188 - 12.007 - - - 12.007 Subtotal Minor Studies - 204.752 - - - 204.752 - 48.028 - - - 48.028 Subtotal Consulting Services 159.533 941.378 539.784 194.268 - 1.834.964 37.421 220.817 126.616 45.569 - 430.424 B. Socialization and Community Development 1. Program Material Development RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 19.319 - - - - 19.319 4.532 - - -- 4.532 2. Program Material Campaign and Implementation RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.898 24.570 25.922 10.255 - 63.645 680 5.763 6.080 2.406 - 14.929 3. Workshop Related to PPP RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA - 8.190 8.641 4.558 - 21.389 - 1.921 2.027 1.069 - 5.017 Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 22.217 32.760 34.562 14.813 - 104.353 5.211 7.685 8.107 3.475 - 24.478 C. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 1.385 4.403 4.645 4.901 - 15.335 325 1.033 1.090 1.150 - 3.597 2. District Consinyering /f RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 2.671 11.323 11.945 12.602 - 38.541 626 2.656 2.802 2.956 - 9.041 3. Communities Consinyering /g RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 1.484 9.436 9.955 8.752 - 29.626 348 2.213 2.335 2.053 - 6.949 4. National/Provincial Workshop /h RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 4.946 5.242 5.530 - - 15.718 1.160 1.230 1.297 -- 3.687 5. District Workshop /i RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA 8.408 8.911 9.402 - - 26.721 1.972 2.090 2.205 -- 6.268 Subtotal Project Coordination and Management 18.894 39.315 41.477 26.255 - 125.941 4.432 9.222 9.729 6.159 - 29.542 D. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Financial Staffs KPA - RCMU RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------1.332 5.648 5.959 4.715 - 17.653 Koordinator Sekretariat RCMU /j RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------2.798 11.861 12.513 9.901 - 37.072 PIU - RCMU RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------1.066 4.518 4.767 3.772 - 14.123 Treasury RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------966 4.095 4.320 3.418 - 12.799 Administrative Assistant RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 3.300 - 12.357 Technical Assistant RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 3.300 - 12.357 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------600 2.542 2.681 2.122 - 7.944 PPK RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------1.016 4.307 4.543 3.595 - 13.461 Pelaksana Administrasi RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------699 2.965 3.128 2.475 - 9.268 Pelaksana Teknik RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------699 2.965 3.128 2.475 - 9.268 Counterparts /k RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------2.531 10.731 11.321 8.958 - 33.542 Subtotal Salaries for Financial Staffs ------13.572 57.538 60.703 48.031 - 179.845 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------1.239 5.253 5.541 4.385 - 16.418 Computer Operator RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------1.239 5.253 5.541 4.385 - 16.418 Office Boy and Security /l RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------999 4.236 4.469 3.536 - 13.240 Subtotal Secretariat ------3.477 14.741 15.552 12.305 - 46.076 3. Transport RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------3.098 13.131 13.854 10.962 - 41.044 4. Procurement RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------10.325 - - - - 10.325 5. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc RCMU_IA RM_PA RCMU_MU RM_CCA ------18.585 78.789 83.122 65.770 - 246.266 Subtotal Project Administration Support ------49.057 164.200 173.231 137.069 - 523.556 200.644 1.013.453 615.824 235.337 - 2.065.257 96.122 401.923 317.683 192.271 - 1.007.999
Remarks: a 2 persons, b 2 personns, c 2 persons, d 2 persons, e 4 persons, f 4 times/year x 1 day x 30 persons, g 6 times/year/district x 1 day x 30 persons, h 2 times/year x 2 days x 30 persons, i 2 times/year x 2 days x 30 persons, j 3 persons, k persons (1 in provincial bappeda), l 2 persons Page 3
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 2.1 - West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation Project (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Unit Cost (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan 1. Replacement Cost (Main Structure) Permanent m2 - 711 - - - 711 520,208 56 - 39.771 - - - 39.771 Semi Permanent m2 - 2.846 - - - 2.846 336,620 36 - 103.013 - - - 103.013 Temporary m2 - 3.996 - - - 3.996 132,664 14 - 57.003 - - - 57.003 Subtotal Replacement Cost (Main Structure) - 199.787 - - - 199.787 2. Compensation for Crop Annual Crops ls - 23.072 - - - 23.072 Trees ls - 54.401 - - - 54.401 Subtotal Compensation for Crop - 77.473 - - - 77.473 3. General Program Capacity Building SHGs - 22 22 - - 44 45,000,000 4,839 - 106.452 106.452 - - 212.903 Matching Grant SHGs - 22 22 - - 44 44,590,909 4,795 - 105.484 105.484 - - 210.968 Vocational Training SHGs - 22 22 - - 44 36,818,182 3,959 - 87.097 87.097 - - 174.194 Subtotal General Program - 299.032 299.032 - - 598.065 4. Administrative Cost ls 561 12.718 12.718 12.718 12.718 51.434 5. Implementing NGO for RP & LRP ls 0,19 0,33 0,33 0,15 - 1 3,227,600,000 347,054 65.940 114.528 114.528 52.058 - 347.054 6. External Monitoring ls 0,25 0,25 0,25 0,25 - 1 460,000,000 49,462 12.366 12.366 12.366 12.366 - 49.462 Subtotal Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan 78.866 715.904 438.644 77.142 12.718 1.323.274 B. Civil Works 1. Bekasi Siphon Construction a. General Works ls 0,034 0,2 0,766 - - 1 1,027,441,800 110,478 3.756 22.096 84.626 - - 110.478 b. Structural Works ls 0,4 0,6 - - - 1 30,807,940,900 3,312,682 1.325.073 1.987.609 - - - 3.312.682 c. New Trash Rack and Gates Bekasi Siphon ls 0,2 0,8 - - - 1 1,100,000,000 118,280 23.656 94.624 - - - 118.280 Subtotal Bekasi Siphon Construction 1.352.485 2.104.328 84.626 - - 3.541.439 2. R&U Works for WTC (ICB) a. Construction of Civil Works Mobilization Cost ls - 0,24 0,76 - - 1 35,762,163,800 3,845,394 - 922.895 2.922.499 - - 3.845.394 Excavation/Dredging of Canal and Sediment Trap ls - 0,2 0,6 0,2 - 1 117,207,647,040 12,602,973 - 2.520.595 7.561.784 2.520.595 - 12.602.973 Excavation Fill ls - 0,2 0,6 0,2 - 1 3,465,924,000 372,680 - 74.536 223.608 74.536 - 372.680 Rehabilitation Slope Between Curug-Cibeet ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 17,366,878,683 1,867,406 - 373.481 - 746.963 746.963 1.867.406 Construction of Side Drain along WTC ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 8,368,552,269 899,844 - 179.969 - 359.938 359.938 899.844 Construction of Lining above Major Culverts ls - 0,2 0,8 - - 1 10,336,184,331 1,111,418 - 222.284 889.134 - - 1.111.418 Bekasi Siphon and Link Canal ls ------Cikarang Siphon and Link Canal ls ------Cibeet Partition Wall and BTb23 Siphon ls - 0,2 0,4 0,4 - 1 24,368,585,307 2,620,278 - 524.056 1.048.111 1.048.111 - 2.620.278 Improvement and Pavement of Maintenance Road ls ------Construction of Road Bridges ls - 0,2 0,4 0,4 - 1 7,135,999,926 767,312 - 153.462 306.925 306.925 - 767.312 Construction of Gas Pipe Bridge ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 1,577,591,829 169,634 - 33.927 - 67.853 67.853 169.634 Building - Spoil Bank Yards ls - 0,2 0,8 - - 1 11,000,000,000 1,182,796 - 236.559 946.237 - - 1.182.796 Subtotal Construction of Civil Works - 5.241.763 13.898.298 5.124.920 1.174.754 25.439.734 b. Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment General Items ls - 0,21 0,79 - - 1 3,894,386,100 418,751 - 87.938 330.813 - - 418.751 Refurbishment of Hydraulic Pumps at Curug HPS ls - 0,2 0,8 - - 1 23,441,574,420 2,520,599 - 504.120 2.016.480 - - 2.520.599 Repair of Trash Rack at Intake Curug HPS ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 4,955,821,200 532,884 - 106.577 - 213.154 213.154 532.884 Cibeet Weir Spillway Gates ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 22,556,728,524 2,425,455 - 485.091 - 970.182 970.182 2.425.455 Repair of Flushing Gates ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 827,624,391 88,992 - 17.798 - 35.597 35.597 88.992 BTb 34b Flood Gates Cikarang ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 2,467,985,454 265,375 - 53.075 - 106.150 106.150 265.375 Repair of Gates ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 4,671,199,071 502,279 - 100.456 - 200.912 200.912 502.279 Repair of Trash Rack at Cawang ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 3,315,415,125 356,496 - 71.299 - 142.599 142.599 356.496 Replacement of Trash Rack Pulogadung ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 3,602,085,300 387,321 - 77.464 - 154.928 154.928 387.321 New Trash Rack and Gates BTb 23 Siphon ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 3,159,437,292 339,724 - 67.945 - 135.890 135.890 339.724 New Trash Rack and Gates Cikarang Siphon ls ------Procurement and Installation Slice Gates ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 2,502,892,260 269,128 - 53.826 - 107.651 107.651 269.128 Repair and Replace Irrigation Offtake Gates ls - 0,2 - 0,4 0,4 1 1,856,745,000 199,650 - 39.930 - 79.860 79.860 199.650 Subtotal Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment - 1.665.519 2.347.293 2.146.922 2.146.922 8.306.655 c. Fencing Fencing km - - - 27 27 54 198,000,000 21,290 - - - 574.839 574.839 1.149.677 d. Works - contingencies lumpsum 2.723.656 - - - - 2.723.656 Subtotal R&U Works for WTC (ICB) 2.723.656 6.907.281 16.245.591 7.846.681 3.896.514 37.619.723 Subtotal Civil Works 4.076.141 9.011.609 16.330.217 7.846.681 3.896.514 41.161.162 C. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture package 1 - - - - 1 204,600,000 22,000 22.000 - - - - 22.000 D. Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Water Resources Engineer man-months 11 8 8 8 6 41 231,198,000 24,860 273.460 198.880 198.880 198.880 149.160 1.019.260 Senior Hydrologist man-months 2 - - - - 2 184,140,000 19,800 39.600 - - - - 39.600 Senior Geotechnical Engineer man-months 4 - - - - 4 184,140,000 19,800 79.200 - - - - 79.200 Water Resource Planner/Irrigation Engineer man-months 2 - - - - 2 184,140,000 19,800 39.600 - - - - 39.600 Senior Hydraulic Engineer man-months 4 - - - - 4 184,140,000 19,800 79.200 - - - - 79.200 Remote Sensing Specialist man-months 1 - - - - 1 184,140,000 19,800 19.800 - - - - 19.800 Operation and Management Specialist man-months 3 - - - - 3 184,140,000 19,800 59.400 - - - - 59.400 Senior Structural Design Engineer man-months 4 - 2 - - 6 184,140,000 19,800 79.200 - 39.600 - - 118.800 Hydro-mechanical Specialist man-months 4 - - 4 - 8 184,140,000 19,800 79.200 - - 79.200 - 158.400 Dredging Expert man-months 2 - 2 - - 4 184,140,000 19,800 39.600 - 39.600 - - 79.200 Water Quality Expert man-months 1 - - - - 1 184,140,000 19,800 19.800 - - - - 19.800 Agricultural Water Management Specialist man-months 1 - - - - 1 184,140,000 19,800 19.800 - - - - 19.800 Senior Economist man-months 1 - - - - 1 184,140,000 19,800 19.800 - - - - 19.800 Senior Sedimentologist man-months 1 - - - - 1 184,140,000 19,800 19.800 - - - - 19.800 Subtotal International Professional Staffs 867.460 198.880 278.080 278.080 149.160 1.771.660
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Unit Cost (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader man-months 11 12 12 12 6 53 19,250,000 2,070 22.769 24.839 24.839 24.839 12.419 109.704 Topographical Engineer man-months 10 - 10 10 6 36 19,250,000 2,070 20.699 - 20.699 20.699 12.419 74.516 Geotechnical Engineer man-months 7 - 6 3 - 16 19,250,000 2,070 14.489 - 12.419 6.210 - 33.118 Water Quality Engineer man-months 4 - - - - 4 19,250,000 2,070 8.280 - - - - 8.280 Hydrologist man-months 6 - - - - 6 19,250,000 2,070 12.419 - - - - 12.419 Remote Sensing Specialist man-months 1 - 2 - - 3 19,250,000 2,070 2.070 - 4.140 - - 6.210 O & M Expert man-months 4 - - 2 - 6 19,250,000 2,070 8.280 - - 4.140 - 12.419 Irrigation Design Engineer man-months 4 - - - - 4 19,250,000 2,070 8.280 - - - - 8.280 Hydraulic Engineer man-months 5 - - - - 5 19,250,000 2,070 10.349 - - - - 10.349 Irrigation O&M Engineer man-months 4 - - - - 4 19,250,000 2,070 8.280 - - - - 8.280 Sedimentologist man-months 3 - - - - 3 19,250,000 2,070 6.210 - - - - 6.210 Dredging Expert man-months 3 - 6 3 - 12 19,250,000 2,070 6.210 - 12.419 6.210 - 24.839 Structural Engineer man-months 6 - 6 6 - 18 19,250,000 2,070 12.419 - 12.419 12.419 - 37.258 Hydro-mechanical Engineer man-months 4 - - 4 4 12 19,250,000 2,070 8.280 - - 8.280 8.280 24.839 Civil Engineer man-months 6 - - - - 6 19,250,000 2,070 12.419 - - - - 12.419 Contract Engineer man-months - 4 - - - 4 19,250,000 2,070 - 8.280 - - - 8.280 Environmental Specialist man-months 6 - - - - 6 19,250,000 2,070 12.419 - - - - 12.419 Sociologist/Public Participation Specialist man-months 9 6 - - - 15 19,250,000 2,070 18.629 12.419 - - - 31.048 Economist man-months 4 - - - - 4 19,250,000 2,070 8.280 - - - - 8.280 Spatial Planner 1 man-months 1,5 - - - - 1,5 19,250,000 2,070 3.105 - - - - 3.105 Spatial Planner 2 man-months 1,5 - - - - 1,5 19,250,000 2,070 3.105 - - - - 3.105 Site Engineers /a man-months - - 36 36 18 90 19,250,000 2,070 - - 74.516 74.516 37.258 186.290 Resettlement Specialist man-months 11 12 12 - - 35 19,250,000 2,070 22.769 24.839 24.839 - - 72.446 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 229.758 70.376 186.290 157.312 70.376 714.113 Subtotal Remuneration 1.097.218 269.256 464.370 435.392 219.536 2.485.773 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips 14 1 3 2 1 21 30,690,000 3,300 46.200 3.300 9.900 6.600 3.300 69.300 OSA and Housing IP for Long-term months 11 8 8 8 6 41 4,400,000 473 5.204 3.785 3.785 3.785 2.839 19.398 OSA and Housing for IP Short-term days 900 - 120 120 - 1.140 552,420 59 53.460 - 7.128 7.128 - 67.716 NPS Housing months 111 34 90 76 34 345 818,400 88 9.768 2.992 7.920 6.688 2.992 30.360 Sub-professional and Technical Staffs mm 45 48 48 48 24 213 4,400,000 473 21.290 22.710 22.710 22.710 11.355 100.774 Supporting Staffs mm 33 36 36 36 18 159 3,836,250 413 13.613 14.850 14.850 14.850 7.425 65.588 Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc months 11 12 12 12 6 53 21,725,000 2,336 25.696 28.032 28.032 28.032 14.016 123.809 Office Furniture and Equipment package 1 - - - - 1 613,800,000 66,000 66.000 - - - - 66.000 Transport months 66 72 72 72 36 318 2,813,250 303 19.965 21.780 21.780 21.780 10.890 96.195 Reporting times 1 1 1 1 1 5 51,150,000 5,500 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.500 27.500 Out-of-station and Various Cost months 11 12 12 12 6 53 20,460,000 2,200 24.200 26.400 26.400 26.400 13.200 116.600 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 290.896 129.349 148.005 143.473 71.517 783.240 3. Subcontract Topographical Survey package 1 - - - - 1 613,800,000 66,000 66.000 - - - - 66.000 Geotechnical Investigation package 1 - - - - 1 204,600,000 22,000 22.000 - - - - 22.000 Hydrometric Survey and Sediment Sampling package 1 - - - - 1 306,900,000 33,000 33.000 - - - - 33.000 Sediment Sampling Program package 1 - - - - 1 153,450,000 16,500 16.500 - - - - 16.500 Satellite Imagery and Documentation package 1 - - - - 1 255,750,000 27,500 27.500 - - - - 27.500 Subtotal Subcontract 165.000 - - - - 165.000 4. Workshop and Training Maintenance of Canal and Sediment Traps ls - - - 0,5 0,5 1 30,690,000 3,300 - - - 1.650 1.650 3.300 Subtotal Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1.553.114 398.605 612.375 580.515 292.703 3.437.313 E. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL AMDAL Public Notification ls 1 - - - - 1 88,000,000 9,462 9.462 - - - - 9.462 AMDAL Socialization for TOR, ANDAL,RKL,RPL /b ls 1 - - - - 1 132,000,000 14,194 14.194 - - - - 14.194 Sampling for Pollution (Water and Soil Sediment, Noise etc) ls 1 - - - - 1 102,300,000 11,000 11.000 - - - - 11.000 AMDAL Securing Exemption and Clearance ls 1 - - - - 1 550,000,000 59,140 59.140 - - - - 59.140 Subtotal AMDAL 93.796 - - - - 93.796 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA man-month 12 12 12 12 12 60 ------Treasury man-month 12 12 12 12 12 60 ------Administration Assistant man-month 12 12 12 12 12 60 ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc man-month 36 36 36 36 36 180 ------PPK man-month 12 12 12 12 12 60 3,050,000 328 3.935 3.935 3.935 3.935 3.935 19.677 Pelaksana Teknis/Pengawas Utama/Site Eng. man-month 60 60 60 60 60 300 2,100,000 226 13.548 13.548 13.548 13.548 13.548 67.742 Pelaksana Administrasi man-month 12 12 12 12 12 60 2,100,000 226 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 13.548 Inspectors man-month 180 180 180 180 180 900 1,800,000 194 34.839 34.839 34.839 34.839 34.839 174.194 Pengawas Pengukuran man-month 60 60 60 60 60 300 1,800,000 194 11.613 11.613 11.613 11.613 11.613 58.065 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 66.645 66.645 66.645 66.645 66.645 333.226 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager mm 12 12 12 12 12 60 3,720,000 400 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 24.000 Computer Operator mm 12 12 12 12 12 60 3,720,000 400 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 24.000 Office Boy and Security /c mm 24 24 24 24 24 120 1,500,000 161 3.871 3.871 3.871 3.871 3.871 19.355 Subtotal Secretariat 13.471 13.471 13.471 13.471 13.471 67.355 3. Transport months 12 12 12 12 12 60 9,300,000 1,000 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 60.000 4. Procurement package 1 - - - - 1 93,000,000 10,000 10.000 - - - - 10.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support 102.116 92.116 92.116 92.116 92.116 470.581 Total 5.926.033 10.218.234 17.473.352 8.596.454 4.294.052 46.508.125
______\a 3 persons \b At least 1 meeting at Karawang and Berkasi District, Bekasi Town and East Jakarta. \c 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Summary Divisions 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Expenditure Account
I. Investment Costs A. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan 1. Replacement Cost (Main Structure) Permanent - 47.873 - - - 47.873 - 47.873 - 47.873 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Semi Permanent - 123.999 - - - 123.999 - 123.999 - 123.999 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Temporary - 68.615 - - - 68.615 - 68.615 - 68.615 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Subtotal Replacement Cost (Main Structure) - 240.486 - - - 240.486 - 240.486 - 240.486 2. Compensation for Crop Annual Crops - 27.772 - - - 27.772 - 27.772 - 27.772 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Trees - 65.483 - - - 65.483 - 65.483 - 65.483 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Subtotal Compensation for Crop - 93.255 - - - 93.255 - 93.255 - 93.255 3. General Program Capacity Building - 128.138 135.185 - - 263.323 - 263.323 - 263.323 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Matching Grant - 126.973 133.956 - - 260.929 - 260.929 - 260.929 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Vocational Training - 104.840 110.606 - - 215.446 - 215.446 - 215.446 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Subtotal General Program - 359.950 379.747 - - 739.697 - 739.697 - 739.697 4. Administrative Cost 637 15.309 16.151 17.040 17.977 67.114 - 67.114 - 67.114 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA 5. Implementing NGO for RP & LRP 74.892 137.859 145.441 69.746 - 427.937 - 427.937 - 427.937 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA 6. External Monitoring 14.044 14.885 15.703 16.567 - 61.199 - 61.199 - 61.199 10,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA SETTLE_EA Subtotal Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan 89.573 861.745 557.043 103.352 17.977 1.629.690 - 1.629.690 - 1.629.690 B. Civil Works 1. Bekasi Siphon Construction a. General Works 3.847 23.588 93.640 - - 121.076 46.091 62.878 12.108 121.076 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA b. Structural Works 1.357.243 2.121.907 - - - 3.479.150 1.359.658 1.771.577 347.915 3.479.150 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA c. New Trash Rack and Gates Bekasi Siphon 24.230 101.017 - - - 125.247 48.738 63.985 12.525 125.247 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Subtotal Bekasi Siphon Construction 1.385.320 2.246.513 93.640 - - 3.725.473 1.454.486 1.898.440 372.547 3.725.473 2. R&U Works for WTC (ICB) a. Construction of Civil Works Mobilization Cost - 985.252 3.233.804 - - 4.219.056 1.605.221 2.191.930 421.906 4.219.056 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Excavation/Dredging of Canal and Sediment Trap - 2.690.905 8.367.264 2.892.073 - 13.950.242 5.276.148 7.279.070 1.395.024 13.950.242 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Excavation Fill - 79.572 247.427 85.521 - 412.520 156.020 215.248 41.252 412.520 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Rehabilitation Slope Between Curug-Cibeet - 398.717 - 857.048 889.066 2.144.830 791.203 1.139.144 214.483 2.144.830 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Construction of Side Drain along WTC - 192.129 - 412.984 428.413 1.033.526 381.256 548.918 103.353 1.033.526 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Construction of Lining above Major Culverts - 237.303 983.845 - - 1.221.147 464.171 634.862 122.115 1.221.147 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Bekasi Siphon and Link Canal ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Cikarang Siphon and Link Canal ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Cibeet Partition Wall and BTb23 Siphon - 559.465 1.159.756 1.202.579 - 2.921.800 1.099.594 1.530.026 292.180 2.921.800 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Improvement and Pavement of Maintenance Road ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Construction of Road Bridges - 163.831 339.618 352.158 - 855.608 322.001 448.047 85.561 855.608 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Construction of Gas Pipe Bridge - 36.219 - 77.853 80.762 194.834 71.872 103.479 19.483 194.834 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Building - Spoil Bank Yards - 252.543 1.047.030 - - 1.299.572 493.981 675.634 129.957 1.299.572 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA MOPW_CW_EA Subtotal Construction of Civil Works - 5.595.937 15.378.742 5.880.216 1.398.241 28.253.136 10.661.466 14.766.357 2.825.314 28.253.136 b. Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment General Items - 93.880 366.052 - - 459.931 174.866 239.072 45.993 459.931 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Refurbishment of Hydraulic Pumps at Curug HPS - 538.182 2.231.275 - - 2.769.457 1.052.699 1.439.812 276.946 2.769.457 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Repair of Trash Rack at Intake Curug HPS - 113.778 - 244.568 253.704 612.050 225.778 325.067 61.205 612.050 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Cibeet Weir Spillway Gates - 517.867 - 1.113.165 1.154.751 2.785.783 1.027.643 1.479.562 278.578 2.785.783 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Repair of Flushing Gates - 19.001 - 40.843 42.369 102.213 37.705 54.286 10.221 102.213 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA BTb 34b Flood Gates Cikarang - 56.661 - 121.794 126.344 304.799 112.437 161.882 30.480 304.799 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Repair of Gates - 107.243 - 230.522 239.134 576.899 212.811 306.398 57.690 576.899 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Repair of Trash Rack at Cawang - 76.117 - 163.614 169.727 409.458 151.044 217.468 40.946 409.458 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Replacement of Trash Rack Pulogadung - 82.698 - 177.761 184.402 444.862 164.104 236.271 44.486 444.862 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA New Trash Rack and Gates BTb 23 Siphon - 72.536 - 155.917 161.742 390.194 143.938 207.237 39.019 390.194 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA New Trash Rack and Gates Cikarang Siphon ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Procurement and Installation Slice Gates - 57.463 - 123.517 128.131 309.110 114.027 164.172 30.911 309.110 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Repair and Replace Irrigation Offtake Gates - 42.628 - 91.630 95.053 229.310 84.590 121.789 22.931 229.310 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA HYD_EA Subtotal Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment - 1.778.054 2.597.326 2.463.329 2.555.356 9.394.065 3.501.643 4.953.016 939.407 9.394.065 c. Fencing Fencing - - - 659.557 684.197 1.343.754 489.989 719.390 134.375 1.343.754 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA FEN_EA d. Works - contingencies 2.789.780 - - - - 2.789.780 1.104.715 1.406.087 278.978 2.789.780 0,0 40,0 10,0 RWTC_CA WORKS_CONTINGENCIES Subtotal R&U Works for WTC (ICB) 2.789.780 7.373.990 17.976.069 9.003.102 4.637.793 41.780.735 15.757.812 21.844.850 4.178.073 41.780.735 Subtotal Civil Works 4.175.100 9.620.503 18.069.709 9.003.102 4.637.793 45.506.208 17.212.298 23.743.289 4.550.621 45.506.208 C. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture 23.613 - - - - 23.613 11.712 9.540 2.361 23.613 5,0 50,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_EQUI_EA D. Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Water Resources Engineer 275.374 202.874 205.309 207.773 157.699 1.049.029 944.126 - 104.903 1.049.029 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Senior Hydrologist 39.877 - - - - 39.877 35.889 - 3.988 39.877 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Senior Geotechnical Engineer 79.754 - - - - 79.754 71.779 - 7.975 79.754 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Water Resource Planner/Irrigation Engineer 39.877 - - - - 39.877 35.889 - 3.988 39.877 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Senior Hydraulic Engineer 79.754 - - - - 79.754 71.779 - 7.975 79.754 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Remote Sensing Specialist 19.939 - - - - 19.939 17.945 - 1.994 19.939 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Operation and Management Specialist 59.816 - - - - 59.816 53.834 - 5.982 59.816 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Senior Structural Design Engineer 79.754 - 40.880 - - 120.634 108.571 - 12.063 120.634 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Hydro-mechanical Specialist 79.754 - - 82.741 - 162.496 146.246 - 16.250 162.496 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Dredging Expert 39.877 - 40.880 - - 80.757 72.682 - 8.076 80.757 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Water Quality Expert 19.939 - - - - 19.939 17.945 - 1.994 19.939 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Agricultural Water Management Specialist 19.939 - - - - 19.939 17.945 - 1.994 19.939 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Senior Economist 19.939 - - - - 19.939 17.945 - 1.994 19.939 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Senior Sedimentologist 19.939 - - - - 19.939 17.945 - 1.994 19.939 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Subtotal International Professional Staffs 873.532 202.874 287.069 290.514 157.699 1.811.689 1.630.520 - 181.169 1.811.689
Page 3 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Summary Divisions 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Expenditure Account
b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader 23.224 26.284 27.204 28.156 14.571 119.440 - 107.496 11.944 119.440 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Topographical Engineer 21.113 - 22.670 23.464 14.571 81.818 - 73.636 8.182 81.818 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Geotechnical Engineer 14.779 - 13.602 7.039 - 35.420 - 31.878 3.542 35.420 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Water Quality Engineer 8.445 - - - - 8.445 - 7.601 845 8.445 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Hydrologist 12.668 - - - - 12.668 - 11.401 1.267 12.668 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Remote Sensing Specialist 2.111 - 4.534 - - 6.645 - 5.981 665 6.645 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA O & M Expert 8.445 - - 4.693 - 13.138 - 11.824 1.314 13.138 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Irrigation Design Engineer 8.445 - - - - 8.445 - 7.601 845 8.445 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Hydraulic Engineer 10.556 - - - - 10.556 - 9.501 1.056 10.556 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Irrigation O&M Engineer 8.445 - - - - 8.445 - 7.601 845 8.445 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Sedimentologist 6.334 - - - - 6.334 - 5.700 633 6.334 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Dredging Expert 6.334 - 13.602 7.039 - 26.975 - 24.278 2.698 26.975 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Structural Engineer 12.668 - 13.602 14.078 - 40.348 - 36.313 4.035 40.348 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Hydro-mechanical Engineer 8.445 - - 9.385 9.714 27.545 - 24.790 2.754 27.545 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Civil Engineer 12.668 - - - - 12.668 - 11.401 1.267 12.668 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Contract Engineer - 8.761 - - - 8.761 - 7.885 876 8.761 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Environmental Specialist 12.668 - - - - 12.668 - 11.401 1.267 12.668 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Sociologist/Public Participation Specialist 19.002 13.142 - - - 32.144 - 28.929 3.214 32.144 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Economist 8.445 - - - - 8.445 - 7.601 845 8.445 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Spatial Planner 1 3.167 - - - - 3.167 - 2.850 317 3.167 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Spatial Planner 2 3.167 - - - - 3.167 - 2.850 317 3.167 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Site Engineers /a - - 81.613 84.469 43.713 209.795 - 188.815 20.979 209.795 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Resettlement Specialist 23.224 26.284 27.204 - - 76.713 - 69.042 7.671 76.713 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Subtotal National Professional Staffs 234.353 74.472 204.032 178.324 82.569 773.750 - 696.375 77.375 773.750 Subtotal Remuneration 1.107.885 277.347 491.101 468.838 240.268 2.585.439 1.630.520 696.375 258.544 2.585.439 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel 46.523 3.366 10.220 6.895 3.489 70.494 63.444 - 7.049 70.494 0,0 90,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA OSA and Housing IP for Long-term 5.308 4.005 4.145 4.291 3.331 21.080 - 18.972 2.108 21.080 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA OSA and Housing for IP Short-term 54.529 - 7.807 8.080 - 70.416 - 63.375 7.042 70.416 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA NPS Housing 9.963 3.166 8.674 7.581 3.510 32.895 - 29.606 3.290 32.895 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Sub-professional and Technical Staffs 21.716 24.031 24.872 25.743 13.322 109.685 - 98.717 10.969 109.685 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Supporting Staffs 13.885 15.714 16.264 16.834 8.711 71.408 - 64.267 7.141 71.408 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc 26.210 29.664 30.702 31.777 16.444 134.797 - 121.317 13.480 134.797 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Office Furniture and Equipment 67.320 - - - - 67.320 - 60.588 6.732 67.320 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Transport 20.364 23.048 23.854 24.689 12.777 104.732 - 94.259 10.473 104.732 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Reporting 5.610 5.820 6.024 6.235 6.453 30.141 - 27.127 3.014 30.141 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Out-of-station and Various Cost 24.684 27.936 28.914 29.926 15.487 126.948 - 114.253 12.695 126.948 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 296.114 136.751 161.478 162.050 83.524 839.916 63.444 692.480 83.992 839.916 3. Subcontract Topographical Survey 67.320 - - - - 67.320 - 60.588 6.732 67.320 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Geotechnical Investigation 22.440 - - - - 22.440 - 20.196 2.244 22.440 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Hydrometric Survey and Sediment Sampling 33.660 - - - - 33.660 - 30.294 3.366 33.660 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Sediment Sampling Program 16.830 - - - - 16.830 - 15.147 1.683 16.830 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Satellite Imagery and Documentation 28.050 - - - - 28.050 - 25.245 2.805 28.050 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Subtotal Subcontract 168.300 - - - - 168.300 - 151.470 16.830 168.300 4. Workshop and Training Maintenance of Canal and Sediment Traps - - - 1.870 1.936 3.806 - 3.426 381 3.806 0,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA Subtotal Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1.572.299 414.098 652.579 632.758 325.728 3.597.461 1.693.964 1.543.751 359.746 3.597.461 E. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL AMDAL Public Notification 10.258 - - - - 10.258 - 9.233 1.026 10.258 5,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_SID_EA AMDAL Socialization for TOR, ANDAL,RKL,RPL /b 15.388 - - - - 15.388 - 13.849 1.539 15.388 5,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_SID_EA Sampling for Pollution (Water and Soil Sediment, Noise etc) 11.925 - - - - 11.925 - 10.733 1.193 11.925 5,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_SID_EA AMDAL Securing Exemption and Clearance 64.115 - - - - 64.115 - 57.703 6.411 64.115 5,0 0,0 10,0 RWTC_CA ADF_SID_EA Subtotal AMDAL 101.686 - - - - 101.686 - 91.518 10.169 101.686 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Treasury ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Administration Assistant ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc ------0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA PPK 4.063 4.307 4.543 4.793 5.057 22.764 - 22.764 - 22.764 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Pelaksana Teknis/Pengawas Utama/Site Eng. 13.989 14.826 15.641 16.502 17.409 78.366 - 78.366 - 78.366 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Pelaksana Administrasi 2.798 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 15.673 - 15.673 - 15.673 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Inspectors 35.971 38.124 40.220 42.432 44.766 201.514 - 201.514 - 201.514 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Pengawas Pengukuran 11.990 12.708 13.407 14.144 14.922 67.171 - 67.171 - 67.171 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 68.811 72.929 76.940 81.172 85.636 385.488 - 385.488 - 385.488 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager 4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 - 27.764 - 27.764 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Computer Operator 4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 - 27.764 - 27.764 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Office Boy and Security /c 3.997 4.236 4.469 4.715 4.974 22.390 - 22.390 - 22.390 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Subtotal Secretariat 13.909 14.741 15.552 16.407 17.310 77.919 - 77.919 - 77.919 3. Transport 12.390 13.131 13.854 14.616 15.419 69.410 - 69.410 - 69.410 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA 4. Procurement 10.325 - - - - 10.325 - 10.325 - 10.325 0,0 0,0 0,0 RWTC_CA PAS_EA Subtotal Project Administration Support 105.435 100.802 106.346 112.195 118.365 543.142 - 543.142 - 543.142 Total 6.067.707 10.997.147 19.385.676 9.851.408 5.099.863 51.401.801 18.917.974 27.560.930 4.922.897 51.401.801
______\a 3 persons \b At least 1 meeting at Karawang and Berkasi District, Bekasi Town and East Jakarta. \c 2 persons
Page 4 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Other Accounts Detailed Costs Impl. Manag. ADB ADF Loan Disb. Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan 1. Replacement Cost (Main Structure) Permanent SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Semi Permanent SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Temporary SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal Replacement Cost (Main Structure) ------2. Compensation for Crop Annual Crops SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Trees SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal Compensation for Crop ------3. General Program Capacity Building SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Matching Grant SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Vocational Training SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal General Program ------4. Administrative Cost SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------5. Implementing NGO for RP & LRP SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------6. External Monitoring SETTLE_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan ------B. Civil Works 1. Bekasi Siphon Construction a. General Works CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 967 5.931 23.544 - - 30.442 b. Structural Works CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 341.251 533.511 - - - 874.763 c. New Trash Rack and Gates Bekasi Siphon CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.092 25.399 - - - 31.491 Subtotal Bekasi Siphon Construction 348.311 564.841 23.544 - - 936.696 2. R&U Works for WTC (ICB) a. Construction of Civil Works Mobilization Cost CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 247.722 813.075 - - 1.060.797 Excavation/Dredging of Canal and Sediment Trap CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 676.574 2.103.781 727.154 - 3.507.509 Excavation Fill CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 20.007 62.210 21.503 - 103.720 Rehabilitation Slope Between Curug-Cibeet CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 100.249 - 215.488 223.538 539.275 Construction of Side Drain along WTC CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 48.307 - 103.837 107.716 259.859 Construction of Lining above Major Culverts CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 59.665 247.368 - - 307.033 Bekasi Siphon and Link Canal CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Cikarang Siphon and Link Canal CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Cibeet Partition Wall and BTb23 Siphon CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 140.666 291.597 302.364 - 734.628 Improvement and Pavement of Maintenance Road CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Construction of Road Bridges CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 41.192 85.390 88.543 - 215.126 Construction of Gas Pipe Bridge CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 9.107 - 19.575 20.306 48.987 Building - Spoil Bank Yards CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 63.497 263.255 - - 326.751 Subtotal Construction of Civil Works - 1.406.986 3.866.677 1.478.463 351.560 7.103.686 b. Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment General Items CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 23.604 92.036 - - 115.640 Refurbishment of Hydraulic Pumps at Curug HPS CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 135.315 561.009 - - 696.325 Repair of Trash Rack at Intake Curug HPS CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 28.607 - 61.492 63.789 153.888 Cibeet Weir Spillway Gates CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 130.207 - 279.883 290.339 700.429 Repair of Flushing Gates CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 4.777 - 10.269 10.653 25.699 BTb 34b Flood Gates Cikarang CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 14.246 - 30.623 31.767 76.636 Repair of Gates CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 26.964 - 57.960 60.125 145.050 Repair of Trash Rack at Cawang CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 19.138 - 41.138 42.674 102.950 Replacement of Trash Rack Pulogadung CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 20.793 - 44.695 46.364 111.852 New Trash Rack and Gates BTb 23 Siphon CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 18.238 - 39.202 40.667 98.107 New Trash Rack and Gates Cikarang Siphon CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Procurement and Installation Slice Gates CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 14.448 - 31.056 32.216 77.720 Repair and Replace Irrigation Offtake Gates CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 10.718 - 23.038 23.899 57.655 Subtotal Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment - 447.056 653.046 619.355 642.493 2.361.950 c. Fencing Fencing CW_DA ADF (25.143% ), OCR ( 46.82% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - - - 165.832 172.028 337.860 d. Works - contingencies CW_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal R&U Works for WTC (ICB) - 1.854.042 4.519.723 2.263.650 1.166.080 9.803.496 Subtotal Civil Works 348.311 2.418.883 4.543.267 2.263.650 1.166.080 10.740.192 C. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 18.404 - - - - 18.404 D. Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Water Resources Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 223.053 164.328 166.300 168.296 127.736 849.714 Senior Hydrologist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 32.301 - - - - 32.301 Senior Geotechnical Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 64.601 - - - - 64.601 Water Resource Planner/Irrigation Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 32.301 - - - - 32.301 Senior Hydraulic Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 64.601 - - - - 64.601 Remote Sensing Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 16.150 - - - - 16.150 Operation and Management Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 48.451 - - - - 48.451 Senior Structural Design Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 64.601 - 33.113 - - 97.714 Hydro-mechanical Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 64.601 - - 67.020 - 131.621 Dredging Expert CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 32.301 - 33.113 - - 65.413 Water Quality Expert CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 16.150 - - - - 16.150 Agricultural Water Management Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 16.150 - - - - 16.150 Senior Economist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 16.150 - - - - 16.150 Senior Sedimentologist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 16.150 - - - - 16.150 Subtotal International Professional Staffs 707.561 164.328 232.526 235.316 127.736 1.467.468
Page 5 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Other Accounts Detailed Costs Impl. Manag. ADB ADF Loan Disb. Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 18.812 21.290 22.035 22.807 11.802 96.747 Topographical Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 17.101 - 18.363 19.006 11.802 66.272 Geotechnical Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 11.971 - 11.018 5.702 - 28.690 Water Quality Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.841 - - - - 6.841 Hydrologist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 10.261 - - - - 10.261 Remote Sensing Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 1.710 - 3.673 - - 5.383 O & M Expert CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.841 - - 3.801 - 10.642 Irrigation Design Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.841 - - - - 6.841 Hydraulic Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 8.551 - - - - 8.551 Irrigation O&M Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.841 - - - - 6.841 Sedimentologist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 5.130 - - - - 5.130 Dredging Expert CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 5.130 - 11.018 5.702 - 21.850 Structural Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 10.261 - 11.018 11.403 - 32.682 Hydro-mechanical Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.841 - - 7.602 7.868 22.311 Civil Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 10.261 - - - - 10.261 Contract Engineer CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - 7.097 - - - 7.097 Environmental Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 10.261 - - - - 10.261 Sociologist/Public Participation Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 15.391 10.645 - - - 26.036 Economist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 6.841 - - - - 6.841 Spatial Planner 1 CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 2.565 - - - - 2.565 Spatial Planner 2 CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 2.565 - - - - 2.565 Site Engineers /a CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - - 66.106 68.420 35.407 169.934 Resettlement Specialist CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 18.812 21.290 22.035 - - 62.137 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 189.826 60.323 165.266 144.442 66.881 626.738 Subtotal Remuneration 897.387 224.651 397.792 379.759 194.617 2.094.205 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 37.684 2.727 8.278 5.585 2.826 57.100 OSA and Housing IP for Long-term CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 4.300 3.244 3.358 3.475 2.698 17.075 OSA and Housing for IP Short-term CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 44.169 - 6.324 6.545 - 57.037 NPS Housing CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 8.070 2.565 7.026 6.141 2.843 26.645 Sub-professional and Technical Staffs CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 17.590 19.465 20.147 20.852 10.791 88.845 Supporting Staffs CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 11.247 12.729 13.174 13.635 7.056 57.841 Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 21.230 24.028 24.869 25.739 13.320 109.185 Office Furniture and Equipment CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 54.529 - - - - 54.529 Transport CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 16.495 18.669 19.322 19.998 10.349 84.833 Reporting CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 4.544 4.714 4.879 5.050 5.227 24.415 Out-of-station and Various Cost CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 19.994 22.629 23.421 24.240 12.544 102.828 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 239.852 110.768 130.797 131.261 67.654 680.332 3. Subcontract Topographical Survey CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 54.529 - - - - 54.529 Geotechnical Investigation CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 18.176 - - - - 18.176 Hydrometric Survey and Sediment Sampling CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 27.265 - - - - 27.265 Sediment Sampling Program CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 13.632 - - - - 13.632 Satellite Imagery and Documentation CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 22.721 - - - - 22.721 Subtotal Subcontract 136.323 - - - - 136.323 4. Workshop and Training Maintenance of Canal and Sediment Traps CS_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA - - - 1.515 1.568 3.083 Subtotal Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1.273.562 335.419 528.589 512.534 263.839 2.913.944 E. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL AMDAL Public Notification SID_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 8.309 - - - - 8.309 AMDAL Socialization for TOR, ANDAL,RKL,RPL /b SID_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 12.464 - - - - 12.464 Sampling for Pollution (Water and Soil Sediment, Noise etc) SID_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 9.660 - - - - 9.660 AMDAL Securing Exemption and Clearance SID_DA ADF (81% ) PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA 51.933 - - - - 51.933 Subtotal AMDAL 82.366 - - - - 82.366 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Treasury PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Administration Assistant PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------PPK PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Pelaksana Teknis/Pengawas Utama/Site Eng. PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Pelaksana Administrasi PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Inspectors PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Pengawas Pengukuran PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Computer Operator PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Office Boy and Security /c PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal Secretariat ------3. Transport PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------4. Procurement PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA RWTC_PA PCMU_MU RWTC_CCA ------Subtotal Project Administration Support ------Total 1.722.643 2.754.302 5.071.856 2.776.184 1.429.920 13.754.905
______\a 3 persons \b At least 1 meeting at Karawang and Berkasi District, Bekasi Town and East Jakarta. \c 2 persons
Page 6 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs ADB OCR Loan Central Government 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan 1. Replacement Cost (Main Structure) Permanent ------47.873 - - - 47.873 Semi Permanent ------123.999 - - - 123.999 Temporary ------68.615 - - - 68.615 Subtotal Replacement Cost (Main Structure) ------240.486 - - - 240.486 2. Compensation for Crop Annual Crops ------27.772 - - - 27.772 Trees ------65.483 - - - 65.483 Subtotal Compensation for Crop ------93.255 - - - 93.255 3. General Program Capacity Building ------128.138 135.185 - - 263.323 Matching Grant ------126.973 133.956 - - 260.929 Vocational Training ------104.840 110.606 - - 215.446 Subtotal General Program ------359.950 379.747 - - 739.697 4. Administrative Cost ------637 15.309 16.151 17.040 17.977 67.114 5. Implementing NGO for RP & LRP ------74.892 137.859 145.441 69.746 - 427.937 6. External Monitoring ------14.044 14.885 15.703 16.567 - 61.199 Subtotal Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan ------89.573 861.745 557.043 103.352 17.977 1.629.690 B. Civil Works 1. Bekasi Siphon Construction a. General Works 1.801 11.044 43.842 - - 56.688 1.079 6.613 26.254 - - 33.946 b. Structural Works 635.461 993.477 - - - 1.628.938 380.530 594.919 - - - 975.449 c. New Trash Rack and Gates Bekasi Siphon 11.345 47.296 - - - 58.641 6.793 28.322 - - - 35.116 Subtotal Bekasi Siphon Construction 648.607 1.051.817 43.842 - - 1.744.267 388.402 629.855 26.254 - - 1.044.511 2. R&U Works for WTC (ICB) a. Construction of Civil Works Mobilization Cost - 461.295 1.514.067 - - 1.975.362 - 276.235 906.662 - - 1.182.897 Excavation/Dredging of Canal and Sediment Trap - 1.259.882 3.917.553 1.354.068 - 6.531.503 - 754.449 2.345.930 810.850 - 3.911.229 Excavation Fill - 37.256 115.845 40.041 - 193.142 - 22.310 69.371 23.977 - 115.658 Rehabilitation Slope Between Curug-Cibeet - 186.679 - 401.270 416.261 1.004.209 - 111.788 - 240.290 249.267 601.346 Construction of Side Drain along WTC - 89.955 - 193.359 200.583 483.897 - 53.867 - 115.788 120.114 289.770 Construction of Lining above Major Culverts - 111.105 460.636 - - 571.741 - 66.533 275.841 - - 342.373 Bekasi Siphon and Link Canal ------Cikarang Siphon and Link Canal ------Cibeet Partition Wall and BTb23 Siphon - 261.941 542.998 563.047 - 1.367.987 - 156.857 325.161 337.167 - 819.185 Improvement and Pavement of Maintenance Road ------Construction of Road Bridges - 76.706 159.009 164.881 - 400.596 - 45.933 95.219 98.735 - 239.887 Construction of Gas Pipe Bridge - 16.958 - 36.451 37.813 91.221 - 10.155 - 21.828 22.643 54.626 Building - Spoil Bank Yards - 118.241 490.219 - - 608.460 - 70.805 293.556 - - 364.361 Subtotal Construction of Civil Works - 2.620.017 7.200.327 2.753.117 654.656 13.228.118 - 1.568.933 4.311.738 1.648.636 392.025 7.921.332 b. Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment General Items - 43.954 171.385 - - 215.340 - 26.321 102.630 - - 128.951 Refurbishment of Hydraulic Pumps at Curug HPS - 251.977 1.044.683 - - 1.296.660 - 150.890 625.582 - - 776.473 Repair of Trash Rack at Intake Curug HPS - 53.271 - 114.507 118.784 286.562 - 31.900 - 68.569 71.131 171.600 Cibeet Weir Spillway Gates - 242.466 - 521.184 540.654 1.304.304 - 145.194 - 312.098 323.757 781.050 Repair of Flushing Gates - 8.896 - 19.123 19.837 47.856 - 5.327 - 11.451 11.879 28.657 BTb 34b Flood Gates Cikarang - 26.529 - 57.024 59.154 142.707 - 15.886 - 34.147 35.423 85.457 Repair of Gates - 50.211 - 107.930 111.962 270.104 - 30.068 - 64.631 67.046 161.745 Repair of Trash Rack at Cawang - 35.638 - 76.604 79.466 191.708 - 21.341 - 45.873 47.586 114.800 Replacement of Trash Rack Pulogadung - 38.719 - 83.228 86.337 208.284 - 23.186 - 49.839 51.701 124.726 New Trash Rack and Gates BTb 23 Siphon - 33.961 - 73.000 75.727 182.689 - 20.337 - 43.714 45.348 109.399 New Trash Rack and Gates Cikarang Siphon ------Procurement and Installation Slice Gates - 26.904 - 57.830 59.991 144.725 - 16.111 - 34.630 35.924 86.665 Repair and Replace Irrigation Offtake Gates - 19.958 - 42.901 44.504 107.363 - 11.952 - 25.690 26.650 64.292 Subtotal Procurement and Installation of Hydro-mechanical Equipment - 832.485 1.216.068 1.153.331 1.196.418 4.398.301 - 498.513 728.212 690.644 716.445 2.633.814 c. Fencing Fencing - - - 308.804 320.341 629.146 - - - 184.920 191.828 376.748 d. Works - contingencies ------2.789.780 - - - - 2.789.780 Subtotal R&U Works for WTC (ICB) - 3.452.502 8.416.395 4.215.253 2.171.415 18.255.565 2.789.780 2.067.446 5.039.950 2.524.200 1.300.298 13.721.674 Subtotal Civil Works 648.607 4.504.320 8.460.238 4.215.253 2.171.415 19.999.832 3.178.182 2.697.301 5.066.204 2.524.200 1.300.298 14.766.185 C. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture ------5.209 - - - - 5.209 D. Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Water Resources Engineer ------52.321 38.546 39.009 39.477 29.963 199.316 Senior Hydrologist ------7.577 - - - - 7.577 Senior Geotechnical Engineer ------15.153 - - - - 15.153 Water Resource Planner/Irrigation Engineer ------7.577 - - - - 7.577 Senior Hydraulic Engineer ------15.153 - - - - 15.153 Remote Sensing Specialist ------3.788 - - - - 3.788 Operation and Management Specialist ------11.365 - - - - 11.365 Senior Structural Design Engineer ------15.153 - 7.767 - - 22.921 Hydro-mechanical Specialist ------15.153 - - 15.721 - 30.874 Dredging Expert ------7.577 - 7.767 - - 15.344 Water Quality Expert ------3.788 - - - - 3.788 Agricultural Water Management Specialist ------3.788 - - - - 3.788 Senior Economist ------3.788 - - - - 3.788 Senior Sedimentologist ------3.788 - - - - 3.788 Subtotal International Professional Staffs ------165.971 38.546 54.543 55.198 29.963 344.221
Page 7 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 5. 2.1. Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs ADB OCR Loan Central Government 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader ------4.413 4.994 5.169 5.350 2.768 22.694 Topographical Engineer ------4.011 - 4.307 4.458 2.768 15.545 Geotechnical Engineer ------2.808 - 2.584 1.337 - 6.730 Water Quality Engineer ------1.605 - - - - 1.605 Hydrologist ------2.407 - - - - 2.407 Remote Sensing Specialist ------401 - 861 - - 1.263 O & M Expert ------1.605 - - 892 - 2.496 Irrigation Design Engineer ------1.605 - - - - 1.605 Hydraulic Engineer ------2.006 - - - - 2.006 Irrigation O&M Engineer ------1.605 - - - - 1.605 Sedimentologist ------1.203 - - - - 1.203 Dredging Expert ------1.203 - 2.584 1.337 - 5.125 Structural Engineer ------2.407 - 2.584 2.675 - 7.666 Hydro-mechanical Engineer ------1.605 - - 1.783 1.846 5.233 Civil Engineer ------2.407 - - - - 2.407 Contract Engineer ------1.665 - - - 1.665 Environmental Specialist ------2.407 - - - - 2.407 Sociologist/Public Participation Specialist ------3.610 2.497 - - - 6.107 Economist ------1.605 - - - - 1.605 Spatial Planner 1 ------602 - - - - 602 Spatial Planner 2 ------602 - - - - 602 Site Engineers /a ------15.506 16.049 8.305 39.861 Resettlement Specialist ------4.413 4.994 5.169 - - 14.575 Subtotal National Professional Staffs ------44.527 14.150 38.766 33.882 15.688 147.013 Subtotal Remuneration ------210.498 52.696 93.309 89.079 45.651 491.233 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel ------8.839 640 1.942 1.310 663 13.394 OSA and Housing IP for Long-term ------1.009 761 788 815 633 4.005 OSA and Housing for IP Short-term ------10.361 - 1.483 1.535 - 13.379 NPS Housing ------1.893 602 1.648 1.440 667 6.250 Sub-professional and Technical Staffs ------4.126 4.566 4.726 4.891 2.531 20.840 Supporting Staffs ------2.638 2.986 3.090 3.198 1.655 13.568 Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc ------4.980 5.636 5.833 6.038 3.124 25.611 Office Furniture and Equipment ------12.791 - - - - 12.791 Transport ------3.869 4.379 4.532 4.691 2.428 19.899 Reporting ------1.066 1.106 1.145 1.185 1.226 5.727 Out-of-station and Various Cost ------4.690 5.308 5.494 5.686 2.942 24.120 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs ------56.262 25.983 30.681 30.790 15.870 159.584 3. Subcontract Topographical Survey ------12.791 - - - - 12.791 Geotechnical Investigation ------4.264 - - - - 4.264 Hydrometric Survey and Sediment Sampling ------6.395 - - - - 6.395 Sediment Sampling Program ------3.198 - - - - 3.198 Satellite Imagery and Documentation ------5.330 - - - - 5.330 Subtotal Subcontract ------31.977 - - - - 31.977 4. Workshop and Training Maintenance of Canal and Sediment Traps ------355 368 723 Subtotal Consulting Services - Detailed Design and Construction Supervision ------298.737 78.679 123.990 120.224 61.888 683.518 E. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL AMDAL Public Notification ------1.949 - - - - 1.949 AMDAL Socialization for TOR, ANDAL,RKL,RPL /b ------2.924 - - - - 2.924 Sampling for Pollution (Water and Soil Sediment, Noise etc) ------2.266 - - - - 2.266 AMDAL Securing Exemption and Clearance ------12.182 - - - - 12.182 Subtotal AMDAL ------19.320 - - - - 19.320 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA ------Treasury ------Administration Assistant ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc ------PPK ------4.063 4.307 4.543 4.793 5.057 22.764 Pelaksana Teknis/Pengawas Utama/Site Eng. ------13.989 14.826 15.641 16.502 17.409 78.366 Pelaksana Administrasi ------2.798 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 15.673 Inspectors ------35.971 38.124 40.220 42.432 44.766 201.514 Pengawas Pengukuran ------11.990 12.708 13.407 14.144 14.922 67.171 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------68.811 72.929 76.940 81.172 85.636 385.488 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager ------4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 Computer Operator ------4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 Office Boy and Security /c ------3.997 4.236 4.469 4.715 4.974 22.390 Subtotal Secretariat ------13.909 14.741 15.552 16.407 17.310 77.919 3. Transport ------12.390 13.131 13.854 14.616 15.419 69.410 4. Procurement ------10.325 - - - - 10.325 Subtotal Project Administration Support ------105.435 100.802 106.346 112.195 118.365 543.142 Total 648.607 4.504.320 8.460.238 4.215.253 2.171.415 19.999.832 3.696.457 3.738.525 5.853.583 2.859.971 1.498.529 17.647.064
______\a 3 persons \b At least 1 meeting at Karawang and Berkasi District, Bekasi Town and East Jakarta. \c 2 persons
Page 8
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 2.2 - Improved Land and Water Management (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 6. 2.2. Improved Land and Water Management Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Work 1. Rehabilitation of Tertiary System Ha 3.000 - --- 3.000 1,650,000 177 532.258 - - - - 532.258 B. Vehicles and Equipment 1. R4 (Cars) units 2 - --- 2 204,600,000 22,000 44.000 - - - - 44.000 2. R3 Cars units - 150 --- 150 17,902,500 1,925 - 288.750 - - - 288.750 3. Field Level Water Management Equipment units - 30 --- 30 2,046,000 220 - 6.600 - - - 6.600 4. Flow Meters units - 1 --- 1 20,460,000 2,200 - 2.200 - - - 2.200 5. Organic Fertilizer Production Equipment units 300 - --- 300 11,000,000 1,183 354.839 - - - - 354.839 6. Office Equipment/Furniture package 1 - --- 1 186,710,480 20,076 20.076 - - - - 20.076 Subtotal Vehicles and Equipment 418.915 297.550 - - - 716.465 C. Training and Demonstration 1. Identification and Appraisal of Target Area times 5 - --- 5 51,150,000 5,500 27.500 - - - - 27.500 2. Training of Trainers packages 6 - --- 6 132,990,000 14,300 85.800 - - - - 85.800 3. Training for Farmers (Field) FG - 150 --- 150 13,750,000 1,478 - 221.774 - - - 221.774 4. Training for Farmers (School Farmers) packages - 150 --- 150 13,750,000 1,478 - 221.774 - - - 221.774 5. Farmers Empowerment packages - 150 --- 150 8,800,000 946 - 141.935 - - - 141.935 6. Organic Fertilizer Storage units 150 - --- 150 55,000,000 5,914 887.097 - - - - 887.097 7. Seed Assistance kg - 30.000 15.000 - - 45.000 12,100 1 - 39.032 19.516 - - 58.548 8. Acquisition and Distribution of Livestock Cows nos - 450 --- 450 7,672,500 825 - 371.250 - - - 371.250 9. Farmers Adviser man-month 450 1.800 1.800 - - 4.050 275,000 30 13.306 53.226 53.226 - - 119.758 10. Supervision years 0,25 1 1 - - 2,25 570,248,100 61,317 15.329 61.317 61.317 - - 137.963 11. Comparative Studies lumpsum - 1 --- 1 613,800,000 66,000 - 66.000 - - - 66.000 Subtotal Training and Demonstration 1.029.032 1.176.309 134.059 - - 2.339.400 D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/Agriculturist man-month 3 12 12 - - 27 25,575,000 2,750 8.250 33.000 33.000 - - 74.250 Land and Water Management Specialist man-month 2 4 4 - - 10 22,506,000 2,420 4.840 9.680 9.680 - - 24.200 Agricultural Socioeconomic Specialist man-month 1 4 4 - - 9 22,506,000 2,420 2.420 9.680 9.680 - - 21.780 Entomologist man-month 1 2 2 - - 5 17,902,000 1,925 1.925 3.850 3.850 - - 9.625 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist man-month 2 6 4 - - 12 17,902,000 1,925 3.850 11.550 7.700 - - 23.099 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 21.285 67.760 63.910 - - 152.954 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs NPS Housing months 9 28 26 - - 63 1,278,750 138 1.238 3.850 3.575 - - 8.663 Sub-professional and Technical Staffs /a man-months 15 60 60 - - 135 7,161,000 770 11.550 46.200 46.200 - - 103.950 Support Staffs /b man-months 9 36 36 - - 81 4,092,000 440 3.960 15.840 15.840 - - 35.640 Office Communication, Running Cost etc months 3 12 12 - - 27 6,649,500 715 2.145 8.580 8.580 - - 19.305 Purchase of Office Furniture and Equipment package 1 - --- 1 102,300,000 11,000 11.000 - - - - 11.000 Transport /c months 3 12 12 - - 27 6,138,000 660 1.980 7.920 7.920 - - 17.820 Reporting times - 1 1 - - 2 51,150,000 5,500 - 5.500 5.500 - - 11.000 Media Material times - 1 --- 1 51,150,000 5,500 - 5.500 - - - 5.500 Out-of-station and Various Cost man-months 9 28 26 - - 63 8,800,000 946 8.516 26.495 24.602 - - 59.613 Subtotal ravel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 40.389 119.885 112.217 - - 272.490 3. Sub-contracted Provisional Sum of NGO Services pm 15 - --- 15 8,000,000 860 12.903 - - - - 12.903 Subtotal Consulting Services 74.577 187.644 176.127 - - 438.348 E. Socialization and Community Development 1. Socialization for Farmers times 100 - --- 100 2,200,000 237 23.656 - - - - 23.656 2. Socialization for District Level times 3 - --- 3 55,000,000 5,914 17.742 - - - - 17.742 3. Workshop for District Level times - 3 3 - - 6 55,000,000 5,914 - 17.742 17.742 - - 35.484 4. Workshop for National Level times - - 1 - - 1 184,446,900 19,833 - - 19.833 - - 19.833 Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 41.398 17.742 37.575 - - 96.715 F. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting times ------G. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 4,000,000 430 1.290 5.161 5.161 - - 11.613 Koordinator Sekretariat man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 - - 8.129 PIU man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,700,000 290 871 3.484 3.484 - - 7.839 Treasury man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,900,000 312 935 3.742 3.742 - - 8.419 Administration Assistant man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 - - 8.129 Technical Assistant man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 - - 8.129 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 1,800,000 194 581 2.323 2.323 - - 5.226 PPK man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 3,050,000 328 984 3.935 3.935 - - 8.855 Pelaksana Teknik man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.710 - - 6.097 Pelaksana Administrasi man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.710 - - 6.097 Counterpart man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 1,900,000 204 613 2.452 2.452 - - 5.516 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 9.339 37.355 37.355 - - 84.048 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-months 3 12 12 - - 27 3,720,000 400 1.200 4.800 4.800 - - 10.800 Computer Operator /d man-months 9 36 36 - - 81 3,720,000 400 3.600 14.400 14.400 - - 32.400 Office Boy and Security /e man-months 6 24 24 - - 54 1,500,000 161 968 3.871 3.871 - - 8.710 Subtotal Secretariat 5.768 23.071 23.071 - - 51.910 3. Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc months 3 12 12 - - 27 4,650,000 500 1.500 6.000 6.000 - - 13.500 4. Transport months 3 12 12 - - 27 9,300,000 1,000 3.000 12.000 12.000 - - 27.000 5. Administration Project Management months 3 12 12 - - 27 6,587,500 708 2.125 8.500 8.500 - - 19.125 6. Materials months 3 12 12 - - 27 3,255,000 350 1.050 4.200 4.200 - - 9.450 7. Reporting times 1 2 2 - - 5 23,250,000 2,500 2.500 5.000 5.000 - - 12.500 Subtotal Project Administration Support 25.281 96.126 96.126 - - 217.533 H. Farmers Contribution 1. O&M Costs for Chopper, Fuel eq-month 900 3.600 3.600 - - 8.100 750,000 81 72.581 290.323 290.323 - - 653.226 2. O&M Costs for Motorcycle, Fuel eq-month - 1.800 1.800 - - 3.600 750,000 81 - 145.161 145.161 - - 290.323 3. Wages for SRI Cultivation ha 1.500 6.000 6.000 - - 13.500 500,000 54 80.645 322.581 322.581 - - 725.806 Subtotal Farmers Contribution 153.226 758.065 758.065 - - 1.669.355 Total 2.274.687 2.533.435 1.201.951 - - 6.010.074 a 5 persons, b 3 persons, c only OM, d 3 persons, e 2 persons
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 6. 2.2. Improved Land and Water Management Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Other Accounts Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. Impl. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Work 1. Rehabilitation of Tertiary System 570.804 - - - - 570.804 226.030 287.693 57.080 570.804 4,7 40,0 10,0 ISWM_CA MOA_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA B. Vehicles and Equipment 1. R4 (Cars) 47.227 - - - - 47.227 23.423 19.081 4.723 47.227 5,0 50,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 2. R3 Cars - 321.648 - - - 321.648 156.773 132.710 32.165 321.648 5,0 50,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 3. Field Level Water Management Equipment - 7.352 - - - 7.352 3.583 3.033 735 7.352 5,0 50,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 4. Flow Meters - 2.451 - - - 2.451 1.194 1.011 245 2.451 5,0 50,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 5. Organic Fertilizer Production Equipment 380.860 - - - - 380.860 188.898 153.876 38.086 380.860 5,0 50,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 6. Office Equipment/Furniture 21.549 - - - - 21.549 10.688 8.706 2.155 21.549 5,0 50,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Vehicles and Equipment 449.636 331.451 - - - 781.086 384.561 318.417 78.109 781.086 C. Training and Demonstration 1. Identification and Appraisal of Target Area 29.669 - - - - 29.669 - 26.702 2.967 29.669 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 2. Training of Trainers 92.567 - - - - 92.567 - 83.311 9.257 92.567 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 3. Training for Farmers (Field) - 239.821 - - - 239.821 - 215.839 23.982 239.821 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 4. Training for Farmers (School Farmers) - 251.812 - - - 251.812 - 226.631 25.181 251.812 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 5. Farmers Empowerment - 161.160 - - - 161.160 - 145.044 16.116 161.160 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 6. Organic Fertilizer Storage 957.067 - - - - 957.067 - 861.360 95.707 957.067 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 7. Seed Assistance - 42.209 22.159 - - 64.368 - 57.931 6.437 64.368 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 8. Acquisition and Distribution of Livestock Cows - 401.460 - - - 401.460 - 361.314 40.146 401.460 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 9. Farmers Adviser 14.014 58.996 61.946 - - 134.956 - 121.460 13.496 134.956 2,5 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 10. Supervision 16.538 69.622 73.103 - - 159.263 - 143.337 15.926 159.263 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 11. Comparative Studies - 74.939 - - - 74.939 - 67.445 7.494 74.939 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Training and Demonstration 1.109.856 1.300.019 157.208 - - 2.567.083 - 2.310.375 256.708 2.567.083 D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/Agriculturist 8.518 36.111 38.098 - - 82.727 - 74.455 8.273 82.727 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Land and Water Management Specialist 4.997 10.593 11.175 - - 26.765 - 24.089 2.677 26.765 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Agricultural Socioeconomic Specialist 2.499 10.593 11.175 - - 24.267 - 21.840 2.427 24.267 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Entomologist 1.988 4.213 4.445 - - 10.645 - 9.580 1.064 10.645 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist 3.975 12.639 8.889 - - 25.503 - 22.953 2.550 25.503 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal National Professional Staffs 21.977 74.148 73.782 - - 169.907 - 152.916 16.991 169.907 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs NPS Housing 1.278 4.213 4.127 - - 9.618 - 8.656 962 9.618 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Sub-professional and Technical Staffs /a 12.194 51.694 54.537 - - 118.424 - 106.582 11.842 118.424 2,3 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Support Staffs /b 4.170 17.680 18.653 - - 40.503 - 36.453 4.050 40.503 2,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Office Communication, Running Cost etc 2.325 9.858 10.401 - - 22.585 - 20.326 2.258 22.585 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Purchase of Office Furniture and Equipment 11.925 - - - - 11.925 - 10.733 1.193 11.925 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Transport /c 2.147 9.100 9.601 - - 20.847 - 18.763 2.085 20.847 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Reporting - 6.320 6.667 - - 12.987 - 11.688 1.299 12.987 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Media Material - 6.320 - - - 6.320 - 5.688 632 6.320 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Out-of-station and Various Cost 9.233 30.442 29.823 - - 69.498 - 62.548 6.950 69.498 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal ravel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 43.272 135.627 133.808 - - 312.706 - 281.435 31.271 312.706 3. Sub-contracted Provisional Sum of NGO Services 13.323 - - - - 13.323 - 11.990 1.332 13.323 0,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Consulting Services 78.571 209.775 207.590 - - 495.936 - 446.342 49.594 495.936 E. Socialization and Community Development 1. Socialization for Farmers 25.646 - - - - 25.646 - 23.081 2.565 25.646 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 2. Socialization for District Level 19.234 - - - - 19.234 - 17.311 1.923 19.234 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 3. Workshop for District Level - 20.386 21.507 - - 41.892 - 37.703 4.189 41.892 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 4. Workshop for National Level - - 24.042 - - 24.042 - 21.637 2.404 24.042 5,0 0,0 10,0 ISWM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 44.880 20.386 45.548 - - 110.814 - 99.733 11.081 110.814 F. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting ------0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA G. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA 1.332 5.648 5.959 - - 12.939 - 12.939 - 12.939 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Koordinator Sekretariat 933 3.954 4.171 - - 9.057 - 9.057 - 9.057 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA PIU 899 3.812 4.022 - - 8.734 - 8.734 - 8.734 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Treasury 966 4.095 4.320 - - 9.381 - 9.381 - 9.381 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Administration Assistant 933 3.954 4.171 - - 9.057 - 9.057 - 9.057 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Technical Assistant 933 3.954 4.171 - - 9.057 - 9.057 - 9.057 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc 600 2.542 2.681 - - 5.822 - 5.822 - 5.822 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA PPK 1.016 4.307 4.543 - - 9.866 - 9.866 - 9.866 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Pelaksana Teknik 699 2.965 3.128 - - 6.793 - 6.793 - 6.793 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Pelaksana Administrasi 699 2.965 3.128 - - 6.793 - 6.793 - 6.793 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Counterpart 633 2.683 2.830 - - 6.146 - 6.146 - 6.146 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 9.642 40.877 43.125 - - 93.644 - 93.644 - 93.644 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager 1.239 5.253 5.541 - - 12.033 - 12.033 - 12.033 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Computer Operator /d 3.717 15.758 16.624 - - 36.099 - 36.099 - 36.099 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Office Boy and Security /e 999 4.236 4.469 - - 9.704 - 9.704 - 9.704 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Secretariat 5.955 25.246 26.635 - - 57.836 - 57.836 - 57.836 3. Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc 1.549 6.566 6.927 - - 15.041 - 15.041 - 15.041 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA 4. Transport 3.098 13.131 13.854 - - 30.083 - 30.083 - 30.083 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA 5. Administration Project Management 2.194 9.301 9.813 - - 21.309 - 21.309 - 21.309 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA 6. Materials 1.084 4.596 4.849 - - 10.529 - 10.529 - 10.529 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA 7. Reporting 2.581 5.471 5.772 - - 13.825 - 13.825 - 13.825 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Project Administration Support 26.103 105.189 110.975 - - 242.267 - 242.267 - 242.267 H. Farmers Contribution 1. O&M Costs for Chopper, Fuel 74.940 317.696 335.170 - - 727.806 - 727.806 - 727.806 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 2. O&M Costs for Motorcycle, Fuel - 158.848 167.585 - - 326.433 - 326.433 - 326.433 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA 3. Wages for SRI Cultivation 83.266 352.996 372.411 - - 808.673 - 808.673 - 808.673 0,0 0,0 0,0 ISWM_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOA_IA ISWM_PA Subtotal Farmers Contribution 158.206 829.541 875.165 - - 1.862.911 - 1.862.911 - 1.862.911 Total 2.438.055 2.796.360 1.396.486 - - 6.630.901 610.591 5.567.738 452.572 6.630.901 a 5 persons, b 3 persons, c only OM, d 3 persons, e 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 6. 2.2. Improved Land and Water Management Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Beneficiaries Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Work 1. Rehabilitation of Tertiary System MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 462.351 - - - - 462.351 108.453 - - - - 108.453 ------B. Vehicles and Equipment 1. R4 (Cars) MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 36.808 - - - - 36.808 10.419 - - - - 10.419 ------2. R3 Cars MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 250.688 - - - 250.688 - 70.960 - - - 70.960 ------3. Field Level Water Management Equipment MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 5.730 - - - 5.730 - 1.622 - - - 1.622 ------4. Flow Meters MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 1.910 - - - 1.910 - 541 --- 541 ------5. Organic Fertilizer Production Equipment MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 296.838 - - - - 296.838 84.023 - - - - 84.023 ------6. Office Equipment/Furniture MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 16.795 - - - - 16.795 4.754 - - - - 4.754 ------Subtotal Vehicles and Equipment 350.440 258.328 - - - 608.768 99.195 73.122 - - - 172.318 ------C. Training and Demonstration 1. Identification and Appraisal of Target Area MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 23.097 - - - - 23.097 6.572 - - - - 6.572 ------2. Training of Trainers MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 72.064 - - - - 72.064 20.504 - - - - 20.504 ------3. Training for Farmers (Field) MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 186.701 - - - 186.701 - 53.120 - - - 53.120 ------4. Training for Farmers (School Farmers) MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 196.036 - - - 196.036 - 55.776 - - - 55.776 ------5. Farmers Empowerment MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 125.463 - - - 125.463 - 35.697 - - - 35.697 ------6. Organic Fertilizer Storage MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 745.076 - - - - 745.076 211.990 - - - - 211.990 ------7. Seed Assistance MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 32.859 17.251 - - 50.110 - 9.349 4.908 - - 14.258 ------8. Acquisition and Distribution of Livestock Cows MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 312.537 - - - 312.537 - 88.923 - - - 88.923 ------9. Farmers Adviser MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 10.910 45.928 48.225 - - 105.063 3.104 13.068 13.721 - - 29.893 ------10. Supervision MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 12.875 54.201 56.911 - - 123.987 3.663 15.421 16.192 - - 35.277 ------11. Comparative Studies MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 58.340 - - - 58.340 - 16.599 - - - 16.599 ------Subtotal Training and Demonstration 864.023 1.012.065 122.387 - - 1.998.474 245.833 287.954 34.822 - - 568.609 ------D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/Agriculturist MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 6.900 29.250 30.859 - - 67.009 1.618 6.861 7.239 - - 15.718 ------Land and Water Management Specialist MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 4.048 8.580 9.052 - - 21.680 949 2.013 2.123 - - 5.085 ------Agricultural Socioeconomic Specialist MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 2.024 8.580 9.052 - - 19.656 475 2.013 2.123 - - 4.611 ------Entomologist MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 1.610 3.412 3.600 - - 8.622 378 800 844 - - 2.023 ------Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 3.220 10.237 7.200 - - 20.657 755 2.401 1.689 - - 4.846 ------Subtotal National Professional Staffs 17.801 60.060 59.763 - - 137.625 4.176 14.088 14.019 - - 32.282 ------2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs NPS Housing MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 1.035 3.413 3.343 - - 7.791 243 800 784 - - 1.827 ------Sub-professional and Technical Staffs /a MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 9.877 41.872 44.175 - - 95.923 2.317 9.822 10.362 - - 22.501 ------Support Staffs /b MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 3.378 14.321 15.109 - - 32.808 792 3.359 3.544 - - 7.696 ------Office Communication, Running Cost etc MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 1.884 7.985 8.425 - - 18.293 442 1.873 1.976 - - 4.291 ------Purchase of Office Furniture and Equipment MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 9.660 - - - - 9.660 2.266 - - - - 2.266 ------Transport /c MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 1.739 7.371 7.776 - - 16.886 408 1.729 1.824 - - 3.961 ------Reporting MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 5.119 5.400 - - 10.519 - 1.201 1.267 - - 2.467 ------Media Material MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 5.119 - - - 5.119 - 1.201 - - - 1.201 ------Out-of-station and Various Cost MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 7.478 24.658 24.156 - - 56.293 1.754 5.784 5.666 - - 13.205 ------Subtotal ravel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 35.050 109.858 108.384 - - 253.292 8.222 25.769 25.423 - - 59.414 ------3. Sub-contracted Provisional Sum of NGO Services MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 10.791 - - - - 10.791 2.531 - - - - 2.531 ------Subtotal Consulting Services 63.643 169.918 168.148 - - 401.708 14.928 39.857 39.442 - - 94.228 ------E. Socialization and Community Development 1. Socialization for Farmers MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 20.773 - - - - 20.773 4.873 - - - - 4.873 ------2. Socialization for District Level MOA_MU ISWM_CCA 15.580 - - - - 15.580 3.655 - - - - 3.655 ------3. Workshop for District Level MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - 16.512 17.420 - - 33.933 - 3.873 4.086 - - 7.960 ------4. Workshop for National Level MOA_MU ISWM_CCA - - 19.474 - - 19.474 - - 4.568 - - 4.568 ------Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 36.353 16.512 36.894 - - 89.759 8.527 3.873 8.654 - - 21.055 ------F. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------G. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------1.332 5.648 5.959 - - 12.939 ------Koordinator Sekretariat MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 - - 9.057 ------PIU MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------899 3.812 4.022 - - 8.734 ------Treasury MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------966 4.095 4.320 - - 9.381 ------Administration Assistant MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 - - 9.057 ------Technical Assistant MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 - - 9.057 ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------600 2.542 2.681 - - 5.822 ------PPK MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------1.016 4.307 4.543 - - 9.866 ------Pelaksana Teknik MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------699 2.965 3.128 - - 6.793 ------Pelaksana Administrasi MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------699 2.965 3.128 - - 6.793 ------Counterpart MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------633 2.683 2.830 - - 6.146 ------Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------9.642 40.877 43.125 - - 93.644 ------2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------1.239 5.253 5.541 - - 12.033 ------Computer Operator /d MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------3.717 15.758 16.624 - - 36.099 ------Office Boy and Security /e MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------999 4.236 4.469 - - 9.704 ------Subtotal Secretariat ------5.955 25.246 26.635 - - 57.836 ------3. Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------1.549 6.566 6.927 - - 15.041 ------4. Transport MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------3.098 13.131 13.854 - - 30.083 ------5. Administration Project Management MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------2.194 9.301 9.813 - - 21.309 ------6. Materials MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------1.084 4.596 4.849 - - 10.529 ------7. Reporting MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------2.581 5.471 5.772 - - 13.825 ------Subtotal Project Administration Support ------26.103 105.189 110.975 - - 242.267 ------H. Farmers Contribution 1. O&M Costs for Chopper, Fuel MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------74.940 317.696 335.170 - - 727.806 2. O&M Costs for Motorcycle, Fuel MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------158.848 167.585 - - 326.433 3. Wages for SRI Cultivation MOA_MU ISWM_CCA ------83.266 352.996 372.411 - - 808.673 Subtotal Farmers Contribution ------158.206 829.541 875.165 - - 1.862.911 Total 1.776.809 1.456.823 327.428 - - 3.561.061 503.040 509.996 193.893 - - 1.206.929 158.206 829.541 875.165 - - 1.862.911 a 5 persons, b 3 persons, c only OM, d 3 persons, e 2 persons
Page 3
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 2.3 - Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives for Improved Water Supply and Sanitation (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 7. 2.3. Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Works 1. Construction Works a. Water Supply Facilities Construction units - 6 4 - - 10 767,250,000 82,500 - 495.000 330.000 - - 825.000 b. Sanitation Facilities Construction units - 18 12 - - 30 184,140,000 19,800 - 356.400 237.600 - - 594.000 c. Solid Waste Facilities Construction units - 18 12 - - 30 385,000,000 41,398 - 745.161 496.774 - - 1.241.935 Subtotal Construction Works - 1.596.561 1.064.374 - - 2.660.935 B. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture package 1 - --- 1 204,600,000 22,000 22.000 - - - - 22.000 C. Training and Demonstration 1. Program Material Campaign by CSO's package - 1 --- 1 204,600,000 22,000 - 22.000 - - - 22.000 2. Training of Trainers packages - 5 --- 5 122,760,000 13,200 - 66.000 - - - 66.000 3. Trainings packages - 5 --- 5 122,760,000 13,200 - 66.000 - - - 66.000 Subtotal Training and Demonstration - 154.000 - - - 154.000 D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Water Supply and Sanitation Planner Specialist man-months - - 3 - - 3 179,025,000 19,250 - - 57.750 - - 57.750 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/Strategic and Community (Regional) Development Expert man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 25,575,000 2,750 8.250 33.000 24.750 - - 66.000 O & M Expert man-months - 3 5 - - 8 22,506,000 2,420 - 7.260 12.100 - - 19.360 Community Health and Environment Specialist man-months 3 6 6 - - 15 22,506,000 2,420 7.260 14.520 14.520 - - 36.300 Water Supply and Sanitation Specialist man-months 2 5 5 - - 12 17,902,500 1,925 3.850 9.625 9.625 - - 23.100 3R Specialist man-months 3 9 --- 12 17,902,500 1,925 5.775 17.325 - - - 23.100 Community Empowerment Specialist man-months 3 12 5 - - 20 22,506,000 2,420 7.260 29.040 12.100 - - 48.400 Media/Public Campaign Specialist man-months 1 4 1 - - 6 17,902,500 1,925 1.925 7.700 1.925 - - 11.550 Participatory Training and Curriculum Specialist man-months 1 4 1 - - 6 22,506,000 2,420 2.420 9.680 2.420 - - 14.520 District WATSAN Specialist /a man-months 3 33 24 - - 60 17,902,500 1,925 5.775 63.525 46.200 - - 115.500 District Community Empowerment and Health Specialist /b man-months 3 33 24 - - 60 22,506,000 2,420 7.260 79.860 58.080 - - 145.200 Financial and Accounting Specialist man-months 1 11 8 - - 20 22,506,000 2,420 2.420 26.620 19.360 - - 48.400 MIS Specialist man-months 3 6 6 - - 15 22,506,000 2,420 7.260 14.520 14.520 - - 36.300 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 59.455 312.675 215.600 - - 587.730 Subtotal Remuneration 59.455 312.675 273.350 - - 645.480 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips - - 1 - - 1 30,690,000 3,300 - - 3.300 - - 3.300 OSA and Housing days - - 90 - - 90 1,023,000 110 - - 9.900 - - 9.900 NPS Housing months 26 138 94 - - 258 1,278,750 138 3.575 18.975 12.925 - - 35.475 Supporting Staff /c months 12 48 36 - - 96 4,092,000 440 5.280 21.120 15.840 - - 42.240 Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc months 3 12 9 - - 24 28,644,000 3,080 9.240 36.960 27.720 - - 73.920 Office Furniture and Equipment package 1 - --- 1 409,200,000 44,000 44.000 - - - - 44.000 Transport /d months 12 48 36 - - 96 10,230,000 1,100 13.200 52.800 39.600 - - 105.600 Reporting times - 1 1 - - 2 51,150,000 5,500 - 5.500 5.500 - - 11.000 Out-of-station and Various Cost months 3 12 9 - - 24 10,230,000 1,100 3.300 13.200 9.900 - - 26.400 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 78.595 148.555 124.685 - - 351.835 3. Sub-contract a. CSO (Facilitators) years - 1 1 - - 2 1,989,121,200 213,884 - 213.884 213.884 - - 427.768 Subtotal Consulting Services 138.050 675.114 611.919 - - 1.425.083 E. Socialization and Community Development 1. Workshop times 1 1 --- 2 66,000,000 7,097 7.097 7.097 - - - 14.194 2. Participation in National/International Events time - 1 --- 1 204,600,000 22,000 - 22.000 - - - 22.000 3. Monitoring and Evaluation packages - 1 1 - - 2 1,023,000,000 110,000 - 110.000 110.000 - - 220.000 Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 7.097 139.097 110.000 - - 256.194 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 4,000,000 430 1.290 5.161 3.871 - - 10.323 Koordinator Sekretariat /e man-months 9 36 27 - - 72 2,800,000 301 2.710 10.839 8.129 - - 21.677 PIU /f man-months 9 36 27 - - 72 3,200,000 344 3.097 12.387 9.290 - - 24.774 Treasury man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 2,900,000 312 935 3.742 2.806 - - 7.484 Administration Assistant man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 2.710 - - 7.226 Technical Assistant man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 2.710 - - 7.226 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc /g man-months 9 36 27 - - 72 1,800,000 194 1.742 6.968 5.226 - - 13.935 PPK man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 3,050,000 328 984 3.935 2.952 - - 7.871 Pelaksana Teknik man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.032 - - 5.419 Pelaksana Administrasi man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.032 - - 5.419 Counterpart /h man-months 12 48 36 - - 96 1,900,000 204 2.452 9.806 7.355 - - 19.613 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 16.371 65.484 49.113 - - 130.968 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-months 3 12 9 - - 24 3,720,000 400 1.200 4.800 3.600 - - 9.600 Computer Operator /i man-months 9 36 27 - - 72 3,720,000 400 3.600 14.400 10.800 - - 28.800 Office Boy and Security /j man-months 6 24 18 - - 48 1,500,000 161 968 3.871 2.903 - - 7.742 Subtotal Secretariat 5.768 23.071 17.303 - - 46.142 3. Transport months 3 12 9 - - 24 9,300,000 1,000 3.000 12.000 9.000 - - 24.000 4. Office, Communication etc months 3 12 9 - - 24 4,650,000 500 1.500 6.000 4.500 - - 12.000 5. Procurement package 1 - --- 1 37,200,000 4,000 4.000 - --- 4.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support 30.639 106.555 79.916 - - 217.110
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 7. 2.3. Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
G. Beneficiaries Contribution 1. Construction Work Water Supply Facilities m2 - 2.400 1.600 - - 4.000 65,100 7 - 16.800 11.200 - - 28.000 Sanitation Facilities m2 - 3.600 2.400 - - 6.000 65,100 7 - 25.200 16.800 - - 42.000 Solid Waste Facilities m2 - 1.800 1.200 - - 3.000 65,100 7 - 12.600 8.400 - - 21.000 Subtotal onstruction Work - 54.600 36.400 - - 91.000 2. Manpower/cash Water Supply Facilities units - 6 4 - - 10 76,725,000 8,250 - 49.500 33.000 - - 82.500 Sanitation Facilities units - 18 12 - - 30 18,414,000 1,980 - 35.640 23.760 - - 59.400 Solid Waste Facilities units - 18 12 - - 30 38,500,000 4,140 - 74.516 49.677 - - 124.194 Subtotal anpower/cash - 159.656 106.437 - - 266.094 Subtotal Beneficiaries Contribution - 214.256 142.837 - - 357.094 Total 197.785 2.885.583 2.009.047 - - 5.092.415
______Remarks: a 3 persons, b 3 persons, c 4 persons, d 4 cars (one in MoA, 3 in the districts), e 3 persons, f 3 persons, g 3 persons, h 4 persons, i 3 persons, j 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 7. 2.3. Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Other Accounts Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. Impl. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Works 1. Construction Works a. Water Supply Facilities Construction - 528.446 365.152 - - 893.598 342.914 461.324 89.360 893.598 0,0 40,0 10,0 SCCD_CA MOH_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA b. Sanitation Facilities Construction - 380.481 262.909 - - 643.390 246.898 332.153 64.339 643.390 0,0 40,0 10,0 SCCD_CA MOH_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA c. Solid Waste Facilities Construction - 795.510 549.691 - - 1.345.201 516.214 694.467 134.520 1.345.201 0,0 40,0 10,0 SCCD_CA MOH_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Construction Works - 1.704.437 1.177.751 - - 2.882.188 1.106.025 1.487.944 288.219 2.882.188 B. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture 23.613 - - - - 23.613 11.712 9.540 2.361 23.613 5,0 50,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA C. Training and Demonstration 1. Program Material Campaign by CSO's - 25.278 - - - 25.278 - 22.750 2.528 25.278 5,0 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA 2. Training of Trainers - 75.834 - - - 75.834 - 68.251 7.583 75.834 5,0 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA 3. Trainings - 75.834 - - - 75.834 - 68.251 7.583 75.834 5,0 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Training and Demonstration - 176.946 - - - 176.946 - 159.252 17.695 176.946 D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Water Supply and Sanitation Planner Specialist - - 64.018 - - 64.018 57.616 - 6.402 64.018 5,9 90,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/Strategic and Community (Regional) Development Expert 9.022 38.249 30.265 - - 77.536 - 69.783 7.754 77.536 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA O & M Expert - 8.415 14.796 - - 23.211 - 20.890 2.321 23.211 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Community Health and Environment Specialist 7.940 16.830 17.755 - - 42.525 - 38.272 4.252 42.525 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Water Supply and Sanitation Specialist 4.210 11.156 11.770 - - 27.136 - 24.423 2.714 27.136 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA 3R Specialist 6.316 20.081 - - - 26.397 - 23.757 2.640 26.397 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Community Empowerment Specialist 7.940 33.659 14.796 - - 56.395 - 50.756 5.640 56.395 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Media/Public Campaign Specialist 2.105 8.925 2.354 - - 13.384 - 12.046 1.338 13.384 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Participatory Training and Curriculum Specialist 2.647 11.220 2.959 - - 16.826 - 15.143 1.683 16.826 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA District WATSAN Specialist /a 6.316 73.630 56.494 - - 136.440 - 122.796 13.644 136.440 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA District Community Empowerment and Health Specialist /b 7.940 92.563 71.021 - - 171.524 - 154.372 17.152 171.524 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Financial and Accounting Specialist 2.647 30.854 23.674 - - 57.175 - 51.457 5.717 57.175 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA MIS Specialist 7.940 16.830 17.755 - - 42.525 - 38.272 4.252 42.525 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal National Professional Staffs 65.021 362.412 263.640 - - 691.073 - 621.966 69.107 691.073 Subtotal Remuneration 65.021 362.412 327.658 - - 755.091 57.616 621.966 75.509 755.091 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel - - 3.658 - - 3.658 3.292 - 366 3.658 5,9 90,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA OSA and Housing - - 12.106 - - 12.106 - 10.895 1.211 12.106 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA NPS Housing 3.910 21.993 15.805 - - 41.708 - 37.537 4.171 41.708 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Supporting Staff /c 5.774 24.480 19.369 - - 49.623 - 44.661 4.962 49.623 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc 10.105 42.839 33.897 - - 86.841 - 78.157 8.684 86.841 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Office Furniture and Equipment 48.119 - - - - 48.119 - 43.308 4.812 48.119 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Transport /d 14.436 61.199 48.424 - - 124.058 - 111.652 12.406 124.058 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Reporting - 6.375 6.725 - - 13.100 - 11.790 1.310 13.100 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Out-of-station and Various Cost 3.609 15.300 12.106 - - 31.015 - 27.913 3.101 31.015 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 85.953 172.186 152.090 - - 410.229 3.292 365.914 41.023 410.229 3. Sub-contract a. CSO (Facilitators) - 247.906 261.541 - - 509.448 - 458.503 50.945 509.448 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Consulting Services 150.975 782.504 741.289 - - 1.674.767 60.908 1.446.382 167.477 1.674.767 E. Socialization and Community Development 1. Workshop 7.761 8.226 - - - 15.987 - 14.388 1.599 15.987 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA 2. Participation in National/International Events - 25.500 - - - 25.500 - 22.950 2.550 25.500 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA 3. Monitoring and Evaluation - 127.498 134.510 - - 262.008 - 235.807 26.201 262.008 5,9 0,0 10,0 SCCD_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 7.761 161.223 134.510 - - 303.494 - 273.145 30.349 303.494 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA 1.332 5.648 4.469 - - 11.449 - 11.449 - 11.449 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Koordinator Sekretariat /e 2.798 11.861 9.385 - - 24.043 - 24.043 - 24.043 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA PIU /f 3.197 13.555 10.725 - - 27.478 - 27.478 - 27.478 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Treasury 966 4.095 3.240 - - 8.301 - 8.301 - 8.301 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Administration Assistant 933 3.954 3.128 - - 8.014 - 8.014 - 8.014 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Technical Assistant 933 3.954 3.128 - - 8.014 - 8.014 - 8.014 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc /g 1.799 7.625 6.033 - - 15.456 - 15.456 - 15.456 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA PPK 1.016 4.307 3.408 - - 8.730 - 8.730 - 8.730 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Pelaksana Teknik 699 2.965 2.346 - - 6.011 - 6.011 - 6.011 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Pelaksana Administrasi 699 2.965 2.346 - - 6.011 - 6.011 - 6.011 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Counterpart /h 2.531 10.731 8.491 - - 21.753 - 21.753 - 21.753 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 16.903 71.658 56.700 - - 145.261 - 145.261 - 145.261 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager 1.239 5.253 4.156 - - 10.648 - 10.648 - 10.648 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Computer Operator /i 3.717 15.758 12.468 - - 31.943 - 31.943 - 31.943 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Office Boy and Security /j 999 4.236 3.352 - - 8.587 - 8.587 - 8.587 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Secretariat 5.955 25.246 19.976 - - 51.178 - 51.178 - 51.178 3. Transport 3.098 13.131 10.390 - - 26.619 - 26.619 - 26.619 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA 4. Office, Communication etc 1.549 6.566 5.195 - - 13.310 - 13.310 - 13.310 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA 5. Procurement 4.130 - --- 4.130 - 4.130 - 4.130 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal Project Administration Support 31.634 116.602 92.261 - - 240.497 - 240.497 - 240.497
Page 3 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 7. 2.3. Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Other Accounts Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. Impl. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area
G. Beneficiaries Contribution 1. Construction Work Water Supply Facilities - 18.384 12.930 - - 31.314 - 31.314 - 31.314 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Sanitation Facilities - 27.576 19.395 - - 46.971 - 46.971 - 46.971 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Solid Waste Facilities - 13.788 9.698 - - 23.486 - 23.486 - 23.486 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal onstruction Work - 59.748 42.023 - - 101.771 - 101.771 - 101.771 2. Manpower/cash Water Supply Facilities - 54.167 38.098 - - 92.265 - 92.265 - 92.265 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Sanitation Facilities - 39.000 27.430 - - 66.431 - 66.431 - 66.431 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Solid Waste Facilities - 81.542 57.351 - - 138.893 - 138.893 - 138.893 0,0 0,0 0,0 SCCD_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOH_IA SCCD_PA Subtotal anpower/cash - 174.710 122.879 - - 297.589 - 297.589 - 297.589 Subtotal Beneficiaries Contribution - 234.458 164.902 - - 399.360 - 399.360 - 399.360 Total 213.984 3.176.170 2.310.713 - - 5.700.866 1.178.645 4.016.120 506.101 5.700.866
______Remarks: a 3 persons, b 3 persons, c 4 persons, d 4 cars (one in MoA, 3 in the districts), e 3 persons, f 3 persons, g 3 persons, h 4 persons, i 3 persons, j 2 persons
Page 4 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 7. 2.3. Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Beneficiaries Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Works 1. Construction Works a. Water Supply Facilities Construction MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 428.041 295.773 - - 723.814 - 100.405 69.379 - - 169.784 ------b. Sanitation Facilities Construction MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 308.190 212.956 - - 521.146 - 72.291 49.953 - - 122.244 ------c. Solid Waste Facilities Construction MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 644.363 445.249 - - 1.089.613 - 151.147 104.441 - - 255.588 ------Subtotal Construction Works - 1.380.594 953.978 - - 2.334.573 - 323.843 223.773 - - 547.616 ------B. Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 18.404 - - - - 18.404 5.209 - --- 5.209 ------C. Training and Demonstration 1. Program Material Campaign by CSO's MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 19.679 - - - 19.679 - 5.599 --- 5.599 ------2. Training of Trainers MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 59.037 - - - 59.037 - 16.797 - - - 16.797 ------3. Trainings MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 59.037 - - - 59.037 - 16.797 - - - 16.797 ------Subtotal Training and Demonstration - 137.753 - - - 137.753 - 39.194 - - - 39.194 ------D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Water Supply and Sanitation Planner Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - - 51.855 - - 51.855 - - 12.163 - - 12.163 ------b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader/Strategic and Community (Regional) Development Expert MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 7.308 30.982 24.514 - - 62.805 1.714 7.267 5.750 - - 14.732 ------O & M Expert MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 6.816 11.985 - - 18.801 - 1.599 2.811 - - 4.410 ------Community Health and Environment Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 6.431 13.632 14.382 - - 34.445 1.509 3.198 3.374 - - 8.080 ------Water Supply and Sanitation Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 3.410 9.036 9.533 - - 21.980 800 2.120 2.236 - - 5.156 ------3R Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 5.116 16.266 - - - 21.381 1.200 3.815 --- 5.015 ------Community Empowerment Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 6.431 27.264 11.985 - - 45.680 1.509 6.395 2.811 - - 10.715 ------Media/Public Campaign Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 1.705 7.229 1.907 - - 10.841 400 1.696 447 - - 2.543 ------Participatory Training and Curriculum Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 2.144 9.088 2.397 - - 13.629 503 2.132 562 - - 3.197 ------District WATSAN Specialist /a MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 5.116 59.640 45.760 - - 110.516 1.200 13.990 10.734 - - 25.924 ------District Community Empowerment and Health Specialist /b MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 6.431 74.976 57.527 - - 138.935 1.509 17.587 13.494 - - 32.590 ------Financial and Accounting Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 2.144 24.992 19.176 - - 46.312 503 5.862 4.498 - - 10.863 ------MIS Specialist MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 6.431 13.632 14.382 - - 34.445 1.509 3.198 3.374 - - 8.080 ------Subtotal National Professional Staffs 52.667 293.554 213.548 - - 559.769 12.354 68.858 50.092 - - 131.304 ------Subtotal Remuneration 52.667 293.554 265.403 - - 611.624 12.354 68.858 62.255 - - 143.467 ------2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - - 2.963 - - 2.963 - - 695 - - 695 ------OSA and Housing MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - - 9.806 - - 9.806 - - 2.300 - - 2.300 ------NPS Housing MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 3.167 17.815 12.802 - - 33.783 743 4.179 3.003 - - 7.925 ------Supporting Staff /c MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 4.677 19.828 15.689 - - 40.195 1.097 4.651 3.680 - - 9.428 ------Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 8.185 34.700 27.456 - - 70.341 1.920 8.139 6.440 - - 16.500 ------Office Furniture and Equipment MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 38.977 - - - - 38.977 9.143 - --- 9.143 ------Transport /d MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 11.693 49.571 39.223 - - 100.487 2.743 11.628 9.200 - - 23.571 ------Reporting MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 5.164 5.448 - - 10.611 - 1.211 1.278 - - 2.489 ------Out-of-station and Various Cost MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 2.923 12.393 9.806 - - 25.122 686 2.907 2.300 - - 5.893 ------Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 69.622 139.470 123.193 - - 332.285 16.331 32.715 28.897 - - 77.943 ------3. Sub-contract a. CSO (Facilitators) MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 200.804 211.848 - - 412.653 - 47.102 49.693 - - 96.795 ------Subtotal Consulting Services 122.290 633.828 600.444 - - 1.356.562 28.685 148.676 140.845 - - 318.206 ------E. Socialization and Community Development 1. Workshop MOH_MU SCCD_CCA 6.287 6.663 - - - 12.949 1.475 1.563 --- 3.038 ------2. Participation in National/International Events MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 20.655 - - - 20.655 - 4.845 --- 4.845 ------3. Monitoring and Evaluation MOH_MU SCCD_CCA - 103.273 108.953 - - 212.226 - 24.225 25.557 - - 49.781 ------Subtotal Socialization and Community Development 6.287 130.590 108.953 - - 245.830 1.475 30.632 25.557 - - 57.664 ------F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------1.332 5.648 4.469 - - 11.449 ------Koordinator Sekretariat /e MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------2.798 11.861 9.385 - - 24.043 ------PIU /f MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------3.197 13.555 10.725 - - 27.478 ------Treasury MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------966 4.095 3.240 - - 8.301 ------Administration Assistant MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------933 3.954 3.128 - - 8.014 ------Technical Assistant MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------933 3.954 3.128 - - 8.014 ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc /g MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------1.799 7.625 6.033 - - 15.456 ------PPK MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------1.016 4.307 3.408 - - 8.730 ------Pelaksana Teknik MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------699 2.965 2.346 - - 6.011 ------Pelaksana Administrasi MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------699 2.965 2.346 - - 6.011 ------Counterpart /h MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------2.531 10.731 8.491 - - 21.753 ------Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------16.903 71.658 56.700 - - 145.261 ------2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------1.239 5.253 4.156 - - 10.648 ------Computer Operator /i MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------3.717 15.758 12.468 - - 31.943 ------Office Boy and Security /j MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------999 4.236 3.352 - - 8.587 ------Subtotal Secretariat ------5.955 25.246 19.976 - - 51.178 ------3. Transport MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------3.098 13.131 10.390 - - 26.619 ------4. Office, Communication etc MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------1.549 6.566 5.195 - - 13.310 ------5. Procurement MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------4.130 - --- 4.130 ------Subtotal Project Administration Support ------31.634 116.602 92.261 - - 240.497 ------
Page 5 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 7. 2.3. Support for Community and CSO Driven Initiatives Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Beneficiaries Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
G. Beneficiaries Contribution 1. Construction Work Water Supply Facilities MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------18.384 12.930 - - 31.314 Sanitation Facilities MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------27.576 19.395 - - 46.971 Solid Waste Facilities MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------13.788 9.698 - - 23.486 Subtotal onstruction Work ------59.748 42.023 - - 101.771 2. Manpower/cash Water Supply Facilities MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------54.167 38.098 - - 92.265 Sanitation Facilities MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------39.000 27.430 - - 66.431 Solid Waste Facilities MOH_MU SCCD_CCA ------81.542 57.351 - - 138.893 Subtotal anpower/cash ------174.710 122.879 - - 297.589 Subtotal Beneficiaries Contribution ------234.458 164.902 - - 399.360 Total 146.980 2.282.766 1.663.375 - - 4.093.121 67.004 658.946 482.436 - - 1.208.386 - 234.458 164.902 - - 399.360
______Remarks: a 3 persons, b 3 persons, c 4 persons, d 4 cars (one in MoA, 3 in the districts), e 3 persons, f 3 persons, g 3 persons, h 4 persons, i 3 persons, j 2 persons
Page 6
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 2.6 - Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading Bandung Water Sources (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 10. 2.6. Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of Bandung Water Sources Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist man-months -- - 12 6 18 235,290,000 25,300 - - - 303.600 151.800 455.400 Economist Specialist man-months -- - 2 4 6 179,025,000 19,250 - - - 38.500 77.000 115.500 Hydrologist man-months -- - 6 - 6 179,025,000 19,250 - - - 115.500 - 115.500 Hydraulic Structure Design Engineer man-months -- - 8 4 12 179,025,000 19,250 - - - 154.000 77.000 231.000 Geotechnical Expert man-months -- - 6 2 8 179,025,000 19,250 - - - 115.500 38.500 154.000 Dam Engineer man-months -- - 4 3 7 179,025,000 19,250 - - - 77.000 57.750 134.750 Subtotal International Professional Staffs - - - 804.100 402.050 1.206.150 b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist man-months -- - 12 6 18 25,575,000 2,750 - - - 33.000 16.500 49.500 Geodetic Engineer man-months -- - 12 6 18 17,902,500 1,925 - - - 23.100 11.550 34.650 Geotechnical Specialist man-months -- - 9 4 13 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 18.097 8.043 26.140 Water Quality/Treatment Specialist man-months -- - 6 6 12 17,902,500 1,925 - - - 11.550 11.550 23.100 Water Resources/O & M Engineer man-months -- - 12 6 18 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 24.129 12.065 36.194 Structural Design Engineer man-months -- - 12 6 18 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 24.129 12.065 36.194 Hydrologist man-months -- - 12 - 12 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 24.129 - 24.129 Irrigation Engineer man-months -- - 12 6 18 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 24.129 12.065 36.194 Irrigation Drainage Design Engineer man-months -- - 10 6 16 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 20.108 12.065 32.172 Agronomist/Rice Cropping Specialist (SRI) man-months -- - 6 - 6 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 12.065 - 12.065 Cost Estimate/BoQ Specialist /a man-months -- - 2 6 8 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 4.022 12.065 16.086 Tender Document Specialist man-months -- - - 6 6 18,700,000 2,011 - - - - 12.065 12.065 Water Supply Specialist man-months -- - 3 4 7 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 6.032 8.043 14.075 Community Development Specialist man-months -- - 8 6 14 17,902,500 1,925 - - - 15.400 11.550 26.950 Watershed and Forestry Specialist man-months -- - 3 6 9 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 6.032 12.065 18.097 Socio Economic Specialist man-months -- - 6 - 6 18,700,000 2,011 - - - 12.065 - 12.065 P3A Specialist man-months -- - 6 6 12 22,506,000 2,420 - - - 14.520 14.520 29.040 Environment Specialist man-months -- - 12 - 12 17,902,500 1,925 - - - 23.100 - 23.100 Resetlement & Safeguard Specialist man-months -- - 12 6 18 22,506,000 2,420 - - - 29.040 14.520 43.560 Dam Engineer man-months -- - 9 3 12 22,506,000 2,420 - - - 21.780 7.260 29.040 Hydro Mechanical Engineer man-months -- - 6 4 10 22,506,000 2,420 - - - 14.520 9.680 24.200 Junior Design Engineer /b man-months -- - 48 24 72 15,345,000 1,650 - - - 79.200 39.600 118.800 Junior Hydrologist man-months -- - 12 - 12 15,345,000 1,650 - - - 19.800 - 19.800 Assistant Community Development Specialist /c man-months -- - 60 30 90 12,276,000 1,320 - - - 79.200 39.600 118.800 Subtotal National Professional Staffs - - - 539.145 276.868 816.013 Subtotal Remuneration - - - 1.343.245 678.918 2.022.163 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Tranport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips -- - 5,5 5,5 11 25,575,000 2,750 - - - 15.125 15.125 30.250 IPS Housing (Monthly Base) months -- - 12 6 18 7,161,000 770 - - - 9.240 4.620 13.860 IPS OSA and Housing (short-term) days -- - 780 390 1.170 1,023,000 110 - - - 85.800 42.900 128.700 NPS Housing months -- - 281 141 422 1,278,750 138 - - - 38.638 19.388 58.025 Sub-professional and Technical Staff months -- - 108 54 162 7,161,000 770 - - - 83.160 41.580 124.740 Supporting Staff months -- - 108 54 162 4,092,000 440 - - - 47.520 23.760 71.280 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months -- - 12 6 18 22,000,000 2,366 - - - 28.387 14.194 42.581 Office Furniture and Equipment package -- - 1 - 1 511,500,000 55,000 - - - 55.000 - 55.000 Transport months -- - 72 36 108 10,230,000 1,100 - - - 79.200 39.600 118.800 Reporting times -- - 4 4 8 51,150,000 5,500 - - - 22.000 22.000 44.000 Purchase of Documents, Satelite Image etc package -- - 1 - 1 255,750,000 27,500 - - - 27.500 - 27.500 Out-of-station and Various Cost months -- - 12 6 18 10,230,000 1,100 - - - 13.200 6.600 19.800 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Tranport and Other Costs - - - 504.770 229.766 734.536 3. Subcontract a. Topographical Surveys package -- - 4 - 4 613,800,000 66,000 - - - 264.000 - 264.000 b. Geotechnical and Geological Surveys /d package -- - 4 - 4 204,600,000 22,000 - - - 88.000 - 88.000 c. Socio Economic Surveys package -- - 4 - 4 204,600,000 22,000 - - - 88.000 - 88.000 Subtotal Subcontract - - - 440.000 - 440.000 Subtotal Consulting Services - - - 2.288.015 908.684 3.196.699
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 10. 2.6. Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of Bandung Water Sources Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
B. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL Study packages -- - 4 - 4 306,900,000 33,000 - - - 132.000 - 132.000 C. Socialization and Community Development 1. NGO for Facilitator Mobilization /e package -- - 0,6 0,4 1 1,046,000,000 112,473 - - - 67.484 44.989 112.473 D. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting /f times -- - 12 6 18 10,150,000 1,091 - - - 13.097 6.548 19.645 E. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management Administration Manager man-month -- - 12 12 24 2,100,000 226 - - - 2.710 2.710 5.419 Technical Manager man-month -- - 12 12 24 2,100,000 226 - - - 2.710 2.710 5.419 Counterpart /g man-month -- - 96 96 192 1,900,000 204 - - - 19.613 19.613 39.226 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management - - - 25.032 25.032 50.065 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-months -- - 12 12 24 3,720,000 400 - - - 4.800 4.800 9.600 Computer Operator man-months -- - 12 12 24 3,720,000 400 - - - 4.800 4.800 9.600 Office Boy and Security /h mm -- - 24 24 48 1,500,000 161 - - - 3.871 3.871 7.742 Subtotal Secretariat - - - 13.471 13.471 26.942 3. Transport months -- - 12 12 24 9,300,000 1,000 - - - 12.000 12.000 24.000 4. Office, Communication etc months -- - 12 12 24 4,650,000 500 - - - 6.000 6.000 12.000 5. Procurement ICB package -- 1 - - 1 37,200,000 4,000 - - 4.000 - - 4.000 6. Procurement LCB package -- - 5 - 5 18,600,000 2,000 - - - 10.000 - 10.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support - - 4.000 66.503 56.503 127.006 Total - - 4.000 2.567.099 1.016.725 3.587.823
______\a Bill of Quantity \b for design and quantity taking, 3 persons \c 6 persons \d and investigation (including sediment, soil, geological for dam) \e community development and sanitation health behaviour changes \f 30 persons \g 8 persons \h 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 10. 2.6. Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of Bandung Water Sources Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Summary Divisions 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Expenditure Account
I. Investment Costs A. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist - - - 337.632 170.842 508.473 457.626 - 50.847 508.473 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Economist Specialist - - - 42.816 86.659 129.474 116.527 - 12.947 129.474 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Hydrologist - - - 128.447 - 128.447 115.602 - 12.845 128.447 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Hydraulic Structure Design Engineer - - - 171.262 86.659 257.921 232.129 - 25.792 257.921 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Geotechnical Expert - - - 128.447 43.329 171.776 154.599 - 17.178 171.776 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Dam Engineer - - - 85.631 64.994 150.625 135.563 - 15.063 150.625 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Subtotal International Professional Staffs - - - 894.235 452.483 1.346.717 1.212.046 - 134.672 1.346.717 b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist - - - 42.203 22.262 64.465 - 58.018 6.446 64.465 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Geodetic Engineer - - - 29.542 15.583 45.125 - 40.613 4.513 45.125 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Geotechnical Specialist - - - 23.143 10.852 33.995 - 30.596 3.400 33.995 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Water Quality/Treatment Specialist - - - 14.771 15.583 30.354 - 27.319 3.035 30.354 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Water Resources/O & M Engineer - - - 30.858 16.278 47.135 - 42.422 4.714 47.135 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Structural Design Engineer - - - 30.858 16.278 47.135 - 42.422 4.714 47.135 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Hydrologist - - - 30.858 - 30.858 - 27.772 3.086 30.858 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Irrigation Engineer - - - 30.858 16.278 47.135 - 42.422 4.714 47.135 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Irrigation Drainage Design Engineer - - - 25.715 16.278 41.992 - 37.793 4.199 41.992 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Agronomist/Rice Cropping Specialist (SRI) - - - 15.429 - 15.429 - 13.886 1.543 15.429 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Cost Estimate/BoQ Specialist /a --- 5.143 16.278 21.420 - 19.278 2.142 21.420 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Tender Document Specialist --- - 16.278 16.278 - 14.650 1.628 16.278 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Water Supply Specialist --- 7.714 10.852 18.566 - 16.710 1.857 18.566 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Community Development Specialist - - - 19.695 15.583 35.278 - 31.750 3.528 35.278 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Watershed and Forestry Specialist --- 7.714 16.278 23.992 - 21.593 2.399 23.992 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Socio Economic Specialist - - - 15.429 - 15.429 - 13.886 1.543 15.429 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA P3A Specialist - - - 18.569 19.590 38.160 - 34.344 3.816 38.160 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Environment Specialist - - - 29.542 - 29.542 - 26.588 2.954 29.542 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Resetlement & Safeguard Specialist - - - 37.138 19.590 56.729 - 51.056 5.673 56.729 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Dam Engineer - - - 27.854 9.795 37.649 - 33.884 3.765 37.649 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Hydro Mechanical Engineer - - - 18.569 13.060 31.629 - 28.467 3.163 31.629 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Junior Design Engineer /b - - - 101.286 53.429 154.715 - 139.243 15.471 154.715 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Junior Hydrologist - - - 25.322 - 25.322 - 22.789 2.532 25.322 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Assistant Community Development Specialist /c - - - 101.286 53.429 154.715 - 139.243 15.471 154.715 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Subtotal National Professional Staffs - - - 689.496 373.551 1.063.047 - 956.742 106.305 1.063.047 Subtotal Remuneration - - - 1.583.730 826.034 2.409.764 1.212.046 956.742 240.976 2.409.764 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Tranport and Other Costs International Travel - - - 16.820 17.022 33.843 30.458 - 3.384 33.843 5,0 90,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA IPS Housing (Monthly Base) - - - 11.817 6.233 18.050 - 16.245 1.805 18.050 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA IPS OSA and Housing (short-term) - - - 109.727 57.881 167.608 - 150.847 16.761 167.608 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA NPS Housing - - - 49.412 26.158 75.570 - 68.013 7.557 75.570 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Sub-professional and Technical Staff - - - 106.351 56.100 162.451 - 146.206 16.245 162.451 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Supporting Staff - - - 60.772 32.057 92.829 - 83.546 9.283 92.829 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc - - - 36.303 19.150 55.453 - 49.908 5.545 55.453 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Office Furniture and Equipment - - - 70.338 - 70.338 - 63.304 7.034 70.338 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Transport - - - 101.286 53.429 154.715 - 139.243 15.471 154.715 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Reporting - - - 28.135 29.683 57.818 - 52.036 5.782 57.818 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Purchase of Documents, Satelite Image etc - - - 35.169 - 35.169 - 31.652 3.517 35.169 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Out-of-station and Various Cost - - - 16.881 8.905 25.786 - 23.207 2.579 25.786 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Tranport and Other Costs - - - 643.011 306.617 949.628 30.458 824.207 94.963 949.628 3. Subcontract a. Topographical Surveys - - - 337.621 - 337.621 - 303.859 33.762 337.621 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA b. Geotechnical and Geological Surveys /d - - - 112.540 - 112.540 - 101.286 11.254 112.540 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA c. Socio Economic Surveys - - - 112.540 - 112.540 - 101.286 11.254 112.540 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA Subtotal Subcontract - - - 562.702 - 562.702 - 506.432 56.270 562.702 Subtotal Consulting Services - - - 2.789.443 1.132.651 3.922.095 1.242.504 2.287.381 392.209 3.922.095
Page 3 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 10. 2.6. Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of Bandung Water Sources Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Summary Divisions 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Expenditure Account
B. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL Study - - - 168.811 - 168.811 - 151.929 16.881 168.811 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA C. Socialization and Community Development 1. NGO for Facilitator Mobilization /e - - - 86.303 60.700 147.003 - 132.302 14.700 147.003 5,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA D. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting /f - - - 15.951 8.414 24.366 - 21.929 2.437 24.366 0,0 0,0 10,0 DEDBWS_CA ADF_CS_DED_BWS_EA E. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management Administration Manager --- 3.300 3.482 6.782 - 6.782 - 6.782 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Technical Manager --- 3.300 3.482 6.782 - 6.782 - 6.782 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Counterpart /g - - - 23.888 25.202 49.090 - 49.090 - 49.090 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management - - - 30.489 32.165 62.654 - 62.654 - 62.654 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager --- 5.846 6.168 12.014 - 12.014 - 12.014 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Computer Operator --- 5.846 6.168 12.014 - 12.014 - 12.014 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Office Boy and Security /h --- 4.715 4.974 9.689 - 9.689 - 9.689 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Subtotal Secretariat - - - 16.407 17.310 33.717 - 33.717 - 33.717 3. Transport - - - 14.616 15.419 30.035 - 30.035 - 30.035 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA 4. Office, Communication etc --- 7.308 7.710 15.018 - 15.018 - 15.018 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA 5. Procurement ICB - - 4.618 - - 4.618 - 4.618 - 4.618 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA 6. Procurement LCB - - - 12.180 - 12.180 - 12.180 - 12.180 0,0 0,0 0,0 DEDBWS_CA PAS_EA Subtotal Project Administration Support - - 4.618 80.999 72.604 158.221 - 158.221 - 158.221 Total - - 4.618 3.141.507 1.274.370 4.420.495 1.242.504 2.751.763 426.227 4.420.495
______\a Bill of Quantity \b for design and quantity taking, 3 persons \c 6 persons \d and investigation (including sediment, soil, geological for dam) \e community development and sanitation health behaviour changes \f 30 persons \g 8 persons \h 2 persons
Page 4 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 10. 2.6. Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of Bandung Water Sources Other Accounts Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Disb. Impl. Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 15.193 7.688 22.881 - - - 322.438 163.154 485.592 Economist Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.927 3.900 5.826 - - - 40.889 82.759 123.648 Hydrologist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 5.780 - 5.780 - - - 122.667 - 122.667 Hydraulic Structure Design Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 7.707 3.900 11.606 - - - 163.556 82.759 246.315 Geotechnical Expert CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 5.780 1.950 7.730 - - - 122.667 41.380 164.046 Dam Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 3.853 2.925 6.778 - - - 81.778 62.069 143.847 Subtotal International Professional Staffs - - - 40.241 20.362 60.602 - - - 853.994 432.121 1.286.115 b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.899 1.002 2.901 - - - 40.304 21.260 61.564 Geodetic Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.329 701 2.031 - - - 28.212 14.882 43.095 Geotechnical Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.041 488 1.530 - - - 22.102 10.363 32.465 Water Quality/Treatment Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 665 701 1.366 - - - 14.106 14.882 28.988 Water Resources/O & M Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.389 732 2.121 - - - 29.469 15.545 45.014 Structural Design Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.389 732 2.121 - - - 29.469 15.545 45.014 Hydrologist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.389 - 1.389 - - - 29.469 - 29.469 Irrigation Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.389 732 2.121 - - - 29.469 15.545 45.014 Irrigation Drainage Design Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.157 732 1.890 - - - 24.558 15.545 40.103 Agronomist/Rice Cropping Specialist (SRI) CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 694 - 694 - - - 14.735 - 14.735 Cost Estimate/BoQ Specialist /a CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 231 732 964 - - - 4.912 15.545 20.457 Tender Document Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - - 732 732 - - - - 15.545 15.545 Water Supply Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 347 488 835 - - - 7.367 10.363 17.731 Community Development Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 886 701 1.588 - - - 18.808 14.882 33.690 Watershed and Forestry Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 347 732 1.080 - - - 7.367 15.545 22.912 Socio Economic Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 694 - 694 - - - 14.735 - 14.735 P3A Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 836 882 1.717 - - - 17.734 18.709 36.442 Environment Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.329 - 1.329 - - - 28.212 - 28.212 Resetlement & Safeguard Specialist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.671 882 2.553 - - - 35.467 18.709 54.176 Dam Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.253 441 1.694 - - - 26.600 9.354 35.955 Hydro Mechanical Engineer CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 836 588 1.423 - - - 17.734 12.473 30.206 Junior Design Engineer /b CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 4.558 2.404 6.962 - - - 96.728 51.024 147.753 Junior Hydrologist CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.139 - 1.139 - - - 24.182 - 24.182 Assistant Community Development Specialist /c CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 4.558 2.404 6.962 - - - 96.728 51.024 147.753 Subtotal National Professional Staffs - - - 31.027 16.810 47.837 - - - 658.468 356.742 1.015.210 Subtotal Remuneration - - - 71.268 37.172 108.439 - - - 1.512.463 788.863 2.301.325 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Tranport and Other Costs International Travel CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 757 766 1.523 - - - 16.063 16.256 32.320 IPS Housing (Monthly Base) CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 532 280 812 - - - 11.285 5.953 17.238 IPS OSA and Housing (short-term) CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 4.938 2.605 7.542 - - - 104.789 55.276 160.065 NPS Housing CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 2.224 1.177 3.401 - - - 47.189 24.981 72.169 Sub-professional and Technical Staff CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 4.786 2.524 7.310 - - - 101.565 53.575 155.140 Supporting Staff CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 2.735 1.443 4.177 - - - 58.037 30.615 88.652 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.634 862 2.495 - - - 34.670 18.288 52.958 Office Furniture and Equipment CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 3.165 - 3.165 - - - 67.173 - 67.173 Transport CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 4.558 2.404 6.962 - - - 96.728 51.024 147.753 Reporting CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.266 1.336 2.602 - - - 26.869 28.347 55.216 Purchase of Documents, Satelite Image etc CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 1.583 - 1.583 - - - 33.586 - 33.586 Out-of-station and Various Cost CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 760 401 1.160 - - - 16.121 8.504 24.625 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Tranport and Other Costs - - - 28.936 13.798 42.733 - - - 614.076 292.819 906.895 3. Subcontract a. Topographical Surveys CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 15.193 - 15.193 - - - 322.428 - 322.428 b. Geotechnical and Geological Surveys /d CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 5.064 - 5.064 - - - 107.476 - 107.476 c. Socio Economic Surveys CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 5.064 - 5.064 - - - 107.476 - 107.476 Subtotal Subcontract - - - 25.322 - 25.322 - - - 537.380 - 537.380 Subtotal Consulting Services - - - 125.525 50.969 176.494 - - - 2.663.918 1.081.682 3.745.600
Page 5 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 10. 2.6. Detailed Engineering Design for Upgrading of Bandung Water Sources Other Accounts Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Disb. Impl. Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
B. Survey and Investigation 1. AMDAL Study CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 7.596 - 7.596 - - - 161.214 - 161.214 C. Socialization and Community Development 1. NGO for Facilitator Mobilization /e CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 3.884 2.731 6.615 - - - 82.419 57.968 140.388 D. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meeting /f CS_DA ADF (4.5% ) PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA - - - 718 379 1.096 - - - 15.234 8.036 23.269 E. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management Administration Manager PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------3.300 3.482 6.782 Technical Manager PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------3.300 3.482 6.782 Counterpart /g PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------23.888 25.202 49.090 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------30.489 32.165 62.654 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------5.846 6.168 12.014 Computer Operator PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------5.846 6.168 12.014 Office Boy and Security /h PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------4.715 4.974 9.689 Subtotal Secretariat ------16.407 17.310 33.717 3. Transport PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------14.616 15.419 30.035 4. Office, Communication etc PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------7.308 7.710 15.018 5. Procurement ICB PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------4.618 - - 4.618 6. Procurement LCB PAS_DA GOVT PCMU_IA DEDUBWS_PA PCMU_MU DEDUBWS_CCA ------12.180 - 12.180 Subtotal Project Administration Support ------4.618 80.999 72.604 158.221 Total - - - 137.723 54.079 191.802 - - 4.618 3.003.784 1.220.290 4.228.692
______\a Bill of Quantity \b for design and quantity taking, 3 persons \c 6 persons \d and investigation (including sediment, soil, geological for dam) \e community development and sanitation health behaviour changes \f 30 persons \g 8 persons \h 2 persons
Page 6
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 4.1 - Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy and Action Plans (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 12. 4.1. Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total I. Investment Costs A. Civil Works 1. Construction Works a. Biogas Plant units - - 275 69 - 344 15,345,000 1,650 - - 453.750 113.850 - 567.600 b. Biogas Enceng Gondok units - - 120 30 - 150 15,345,000 1,650 - - 198.000 49.500 - 247.500 c. 3R Garbage Bins units - - 200 50 - 250 10,230,000 1,100 - - 220.000 55.000 - 275.000 d. River Bank Gardening units - - 1 -- 1 511,500,000 55,000 - - 55.000 - - 55.000 e. Communal Septitanc and WC units - - 36 10 - 46 15,345,000 1,650 - - 59.400 16.500 - 75.900 f. Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant units - - 38 10 - 48 204,600,000 22,000 - - 836.000 220.000 - 1.056.000 Subtotal Construction Works - - 1.822.150 454.850 - 2.277.000 B. Equipment 1. Telemetric Equipment unit - - 1 -- 1 255,750,000 27,500 - - 27.500 - - 27.500 2. Equipment/Furniture package - 1 - -- 1 173,910,000 18,700 - 18.700 - - - 18.700 Subtotal Equipment - 18.700 27.500 - - 46.200 C. Training and Demonstration 1. Training times - 1 1 1 - 3 265,980,000 28,600 - 28.600 28.600 28.600 - 85.800 D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Part A: Environmental/Water Resources Specialist man-month - 2 - -- 2 179,025,000 19,250 - 38.500 - - - 38.500 Part B: Environmental/Water Resources Specialist man-month - 3 3 -- 6 179,025,000 19,250 - 57.750 57.750 - - 115.500 Part B: Environmental Economist Specialist man-month - 3 3,5 -- 6,5 179,025,000 19,250 - 57.750 67.375 - - 125.125 Subtotal International Professional Staffs - 154.000 125.125 - - 279.125 b. National Professional Staffs Part A: Team Leader/Environmental Management Specialist man-month - 6 - -- 6 25,575,000 2,750 - 16.500 - - - 16.500 Part A: Environmental Economist/Financial Specialist man-month - 3 - -- 3 17,902,500 1,925 - 5.775 - -- 5.775 Part A: Water Quality Engineer man-month - 2 - -- 2 17,902,500 1,925 - 3.850 - -- 3.850 Part A: Watershed Management Specialist man-month - 2 - -- 2 17,902,500 1,925 - 3.850 - -- 3.850 Part A: Sociologist/Community Empowerment Specialist man-month - 2 - -- 2 18,700,000 2,011 - 4.022 - -- 4.022 Part A: Institutional Specialist man-month - 2 - -- 2 18,700,000 2,011 - 4.022 - -- 4.022 Part B: Team Leader/Environmental Management Specialist man-month - 9 12 3 - 24 25,575,000 2,750 - 24.750 33.000 8.250 - 66.000 Part B: Environmental Economist/Financial Specialist man-month - 6 12 2,5 - 20,5 17,902,500 1,925 - 11.550 23.100 4.813 - 39.463 Part B: Water Quality Engineer man-month - 5 6 2 - 13 17,902,500 1,925 - 9.625 11.550 3.850 - 25.025 Part B: Laboratory WQ Expert man-month - 3 3 2 - 8 17,902,500 1,925 - 5.775 5.775 3.850 - 15.400 Part B: Watershed Management Specialist man-month - 2 5 -- 7 17,902,500 1,925 - 3.850 9.625 - - 13.475 Part B: Database and GIS Specialist man-month - 2 5 1 - 8 17,902,500 1,925 - 3.850 9.625 1.925 - 15.400 Part B: Information Communication Technology man-month - 2 4 -- 6 17,902,500 1,925 - 3.850 7.700 - - 11.550 Part B: Sociologist/Community Empowerment Specialist man-month - 6 6 -- 12 18,700,000 2,011 - 12.065 12.065 - - 24.129 Part B: Institutional Specialist man-month - 3 3 -- 6 18,700,000 2,011 - 6.032 6.032 - - 12.065 Part B: Solid Waste Specialist man-month - 3 3 -- 6 17,902,500 1,925 - 5.775 5.775 - - 11.550 Part B: Biogaz Specialist man-month - 3 3 -- 6 17,902,500 1,925 - 5.775 5.775 - - 11.550 Part B: Training Specialist man-month - 2 2 -- 4 18,700,000 2,011 - 4.022 4.022 -- 8.043 Part B: Quality Control Specialist man-month - 3 7 -- 10 18,700,000 2,011 - 6.032 14.075 - - 20.108 Part B: Community Contracting Specialist man-month - 4 8 -- 12 18,700,000 2,011 - 8.043 16.086 - - 24.129 Subtotal National Professional Staffs - 149.012 164.205 22.688 - 335.904 Subtotal Remuneration - 303.012 289.330 22.688 - 615.029 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips - 3 2 -- 5 25,575,000 2,750 - 8.250 5.500 - - 13.750 OSA and Housing days - 240 195 -- 435 1,023,000 110 - 26.400 21.450 - - 47.850 NPS Housing months - 70 79 10,5 - 159,5 1,023,000 110 - 7.700 8.690 1.155 - 17.545 Sub-professional and Technical Staffs /a months - 36 48 12 - 96 7,161,600 770 - 27.722 36.963 9.241 - 73.926 Supporting Staffs /b months - 27 36 9 - 72 4,092,000 440 - 11.880 15.840 3.960 - 31.680 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months - 9 12 3 - 24 16,368,000 1,760 - 15.840 21.120 5.280 - 42.240 Office Furniture and Equipment package - 1 - -- 1 153,450,000 16,500 - 16.500 - - - 16.500 Transport /c months - 18 24 6 - 48 10,230,000 1,100 - 19.800 26.400 6.600 - 52.800 Reporting times - 1 1 -- 2 25,575,000 2,750 - 2.750 2.750 -- 5.500 Out-of-station and Various Cost months - 9 12 3 - 24 10,230,000 1,100 - 9.900 13.200 3.300 - 26.400 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs - 146.742 151.913 29.536 - 328.191 Subtotal Consulting Services - 449.754 441.243 52.223 - 943.220 E. Survey and Investigation 1. Water Sampling and Testing times - 1 1 -- 2 102,300,000 11,000 - 11.000 11.000 - - 22.000 F. Socialization and Community Development 1. Workshops Districts and Villages times - 6 6 1 - 13 44,000,000 4,731 - 28.387 28.387 4.731 - 61.505 2. Community Meetings/Workshop times - 2 2 1 - 5 38,500,000 4,140 - 8.280 8.280 4.140 - 20.699 3. CSOs CDD Support Facilitation package - 0,5 0,5 -- 1 1,286,615,000 138,346 - 69.173 69.173 - - 138.346 4. District Planning Meetings packages - 6 6 2 - 14 102,300,000 11,000 - 66.000 66.000 22.000 - 154.000 5. Media Campaign Material package - 1 - -- 1 818,400,000 88,000 - 88.000 - - - 88.000 Subtotal Socialization and Community Development - 259.840 171.840 30.871 - 462.550 G. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 4,000,000 430 - 3.871 5.161 1.290 - 10.323 Koordinator Sekretariat /d man-months - 27 36 9 - 72 2,800,000 301 - 8.129 10.839 2.710 - 21.677 PIU man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 3,200,000 344 - 3.097 4.129 1.032 - 8.258 Treasury man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 2,900,000 312 - 2.806 3.742 935 - 7.484 Administration Assistant man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 2,800,000 301 - 2.710 3.613 903 - 7.226 Technical Assistant man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 2,800,000 301 - 2.710 3.613 903 - 7.226 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc /e man-months - 27 36 9 - 72 1,800,000 194 - 5.226 6.968 1.742 - 13.935 PPK man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 3,050,000 328 - 2.952 3.935 984 - 7.871 Pelaksana Teknik man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 2,100,000 226 - 2.032 2.710 677 - 5.419 Pelaksana Administrasi man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 2,100,000 226 - 2.032 2.710 677 - 5.419 Counterpart /f man-months - 36 48 12 - 96 1,900,000 204 - 7.355 9.806 2.452 - 19.613 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management - 42.919 57.226 14.306 - 114.452
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 12. 4.1. Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 3,720,000 400 - 3.600 4.800 1.200 - 9.600 Computer Operator man-months - 9 12 3 - 24 3,720,000 400 - 3.600 4.800 1.200 - 9.600 Office Boy and Security /g man-months - 18 24 6 - 48 1,500,000 161 - 2.903 3.871 968 - 7.742 Subtotal Secretariat - 10.103 13.471 3.368 - 26.942 3. Transport months - 9 12 3 - 24 9,300,000 1,000 - 9.000 12.000 3.000 - 24.000 4. Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc months - 9 12 3 - 24 4,650,000 500 - 4.500 6.000 1.500 - 12.000 5. Procurement package - 1 - -- 1 93,000,000 10,000 - 10.000 - - - 10.000 6. Telemetric O & M years - 1 1 -- 2 23,250,000 2,500 - 2.500 2.500 -- 5.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support - 79.023 91.197 22.174 - 192.394 H. Beneficiaries Contribution 1. Construction Work a. Biogas Plant m2 - - 41.250 10.350 - 51.600 65,100 7 - - 288.750 72.450 - 361.200 b. Biogas Enceng Gondok m2 - - 18.000 4.500 - 22.500 65,100 7 - - 126.000 31.500 - 157.500 c. 3R Garbage Bins units - - 30.000 7.500 - 37.500 65,100 7 - - 210.000 52.500 - 262.500 d. River Bank Gardening m2 ------e. Communal Septitanc and WC m2 - - 21.600 6.000 - 27.600 65,100 7 - - 151.200 42.000 - 193.200 f. Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant m2 - - 11.400 3.000 - 14.400 65,100 7 - - 79.800 21.000 - 100.800 Subtotal onstruction Work - - 855.750 219.450 - 1.075.200 2. Manpower/cash Biogas Plant units - - 331 83 - 414 1,534,500 165 - - 54.615 13.695 - 68.310 Biogas Enceng Gondok units - - 144 36 - 180 1,534,500 165 - - 23.760 5.940 - 29.700 3R Garbage Bins units - - 240 60 - 300 1,023,000 110 - - 26.400 6.600 - 33.000 River Bank Gardening units - - 1 -- 1 51,150,000 5,500 - - 5.500 -- 5.500 Communal Septitanc and WC units - - 44 12 - 56 1,534,500 165 - - 7.260 1.980 - 9.240 Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant units - - 46 12 - 58 20,460,000 2,200 - - 101.200 26.400 - 127.600 Subtotal anpower/cash - - 218.735 54.615 - 273.350 Subtotal Beneficiaries Contribution - - 1.074.485 274.065 - 1.348.550 Total - 846.916 3.668.014 862.783 - 5.377.713
______\a 4 persons \b 3 persons \c 2 cars \d 3 persons \e 3 persons \f 4 persons \g 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 12. 4.1. Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Other Accounts Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. Impl. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Works 1. Construction Works a. Biogas Plant - - 506.015 132.073 - 638.088 - 574.279 63.809 638.088 0,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA MOE_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA b. Biogas Enceng Gondok - - 220.806 57.423 - 278.230 - 250.407 27.823 278.230 0,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA MOE_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA c. 3R Garbage Bins - - 245.341 63.804 - 309.144 - 278.230 30.914 309.144 0,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA MOE_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA d. River Bank Gardening - - 61.335 - - 61.335 - 55.202 6.134 61.335 0,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA MOE_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA e. Communal Septitanc and WC - - 66.242 19.141 - 85.383 - 76.845 8.538 85.383 0,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA MOE_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA f. Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant - - 932.294 255.214 - 1.187.508 - 1.068.757 118.751 1.187.508 0,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA MOE_CW_EA CW_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Construction Works - - 2.032.033 527.656 - 2.559.689 - 2.303.720 255.969 2.559.689 B. Equipment 1. Telemetric Equipment - - 30.508 - - 30.508 14.822 12.635 3.051 30.508 3,0 50,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA 2. Equipment/Furniture - 20.239 - - - 20.239 9.960 8.255 2.024 20.239 3,0 50,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Equipment - 20.239 30.508 - - 50.747 24.782 20.890 5.075 50.747 C. Training and Demonstration 1. Training - 31.565 32.851 34.173 - 98.589 - 88.730 9.859 98.589 3,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Part A: Environmental/Water Resources Specialist - 41.707 - - - 41.707 37.536 - 4.171 41.707 4,8 90,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Environmental/Water Resources Specialist - 62.560 63.311 - - 125.871 113.284 - 12.587 125.871 4,8 90,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Environmental Economist Specialist - 62.560 73.863 - - 136.423 122.780 - 13.642 136.423 4,8 90,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal International Professional Staffs - 166.827 137.173 - - 304.000 273.600 - 30.400 304.000 b. National Professional Staffs Part A: Team Leader/Environmental Management Specialist - 18.520 - - - 18.520 - 16.668 1.852 18.520 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part A: Environmental Economist/Financial Specialist - 6.482 - -- 6.482 - 5.834 648 6.482 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part A: Water Quality Engineer - 4.321 - -- 4.321 - 3.889 432 4.321 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part A: Watershed Management Specialist - 4.321 - -- 4.321 - 3.889 432 4.321 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part A: Sociologist/Community Empowerment Specialist - 4.514 - -- 4.514 - 4.062 451 4.514 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part A: Institutional Specialist - 4.514 - -- 4.514 - 4.062 451 4.514 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Team Leader/Environmental Management Specialist - 27.780 38.549 10.025 - 76.354 - 68.719 7.635 76.354 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Environmental Economist/Financial Specialist - 12.964 26.984 5.848 - 45.796 - 41.217 4.580 45.796 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Water Quality Engineer - 10.803 13.492 4.678 - 28.974 - 26.077 2.897 28.974 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Laboratory WQ Expert - 6.482 6.746 4.678 - 17.906 - 16.116 1.791 17.906 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Watershed Management Specialist - 4.321 11.243 - - 15.565 - 14.008 1.556 15.565 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Database and GIS Specialist - 4.321 11.243 2.339 - 17.904 - 16.114 1.790 17.904 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Information Communication Technology - 4.321 8.995 - - 13.316 - 11.985 1.332 13.316 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Sociologist/Community Empowerment Specialist - 13.541 14.093 - - 27.635 - 24.871 2.763 27.635 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Institutional Specialist - 6.771 7.047 - - 13.817 - 12.436 1.382 13.817 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Solid Waste Specialist - 6.482 6.746 - - 13.228 - 11.905 1.323 13.228 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Biogaz Specialist - 6.482 6.746 - - 13.228 - 11.905 1.323 13.228 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Training Specialist - 4.514 4.698 -- 9.212 - 8.290 921 9.212 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Quality Control Specialist - 6.771 16.442 - - 23.213 - 20.892 2.321 23.213 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Part B: Community Contracting Specialist - 9.028 18.791 - - 27.819 - 25.037 2.782 27.819 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal National Professional Staffs - 167.254 191.816 27.569 - 386.640 - 347.976 38.664 386.640 Subtotal Remuneration - 334.081 328.990 27.569 - 690.640 273.600 347.976 69.064 690.640 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel - 8.937 6.030 - - 14.967 13.470 - 1.497 14.967 4,8 90,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA OSA and Housing - 29.632 25.057 - - 54.689 - 49.220 5.469 54.689 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA NPS Housing - 8.643 10.151 1.404 - 20.197 - 18.178 2.020 20.197 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Sub-professional and Technical Staffs /a - 31.116 43.179 11.229 - 85.524 - 76.972 8.552 85.524 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Supporting Staffs /b - 13.334 18.504 4.812 - 36.650 - 32.985 3.665 36.650 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc - 17.779 24.671 6.416 - 48.867 - 43.980 4.887 48.867 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Office Furniture and Equipment - 18.520 - - - 18.520 - 16.668 1.852 18.520 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Transport /c - 22.224 30.839 8.020 - 61.083 - 54.975 6.108 61.083 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Reporting - 3.087 3.212 -- 6.299 - 5.669 630 6.299 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Out-of-station and Various Cost - 11.112 15.420 4.010 - 30.542 - 27.488 3.054 30.542 4,8 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs - 164.384 177.063 35.891 - 377.338 13.470 326.134 37.734 377.338 Subtotal Consulting Services - 498.465 506.053 63.460 - 1.067.978 287.070 674.110 106.798 1.067.978 E. Survey and Investigation 1. Water Sampling and Testing - 12.639 13.334 - - 25.973 - 23.376 2.597 25.973 5,0 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_SID_EA SID_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA F. Socialization and Community Development 1. Workshops Districts and Villages - 32.275 34.050 5.987 - 72.313 - 65.081 7.231 72.313 3,9 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA 2. Community Meetings/Workshop - 9.414 9.931 5.239 - 24.584 - 22.125 2.458 24.584 3,9 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA 3. CSOs CDD Support Facilitation - 78.647 82.973 - - 161.620 - 145.458 16.162 161.620 3,9 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA 4. District Planning Meetings - 75.040 79.167 27.840 - 182.047 - 163.842 18.205 182.047 3,9 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA 5. Media Campaign Material - 100.053 - - - 100.053 - 90.048 10.005 100.053 3,9 0,0 10,0 DIBR_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Socialization and Community Development - 295.428 206.121 39.066 - 540.616 - 486.554 54.062 540.616 G. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA - 4.148 5.756 1.497 - 11.400 - 11.400 - 11.400 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Koordinator Sekretariat /d - 8.710 12.087 3.143 - 23.941 - 23.941 - 23.941 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA PIU - 3.318 4.605 1.197 - 9.120 - 9.120 - 9.120 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Treasury - 3.007 4.173 1.085 - 8.265 - 8.265 - 8.265 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Administration Assistant - 2.903 4.029 1.048 - 7.980 - 7.980 - 7.980 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Technical Assistant - 2.903 4.029 1.048 - 7.980 - 7.980 - 7.980 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc /e - 5.600 7.770 2.021 - 15.391 - 15.391 - 15.391 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA PPK - 3.163 4.389 1.141 - 8.693 - 8.693 - 8.693 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Pelaksana Teknik - 2.178 3.022 786 - 5.985 - 5.985 - 5.985 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Pelaksana Administrasi - 2.178 3.022 786 - 5.985 - 5.985 - 5.985 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Counterpart /f - 7.881 10.936 2.844 - 21.661 - 21.661 - 21.661 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management - 45.989 63.817 16.596 - 126.403 - 126.403 - 126.403
Page 3 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 12. 4.1. Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Other Accounts Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. Impl. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Proj. Area 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager - 3.857 5.353 1.392 - 10.602 - 10.602 - 10.602 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Computer Operator - 3.857 5.353 1.392 - 10.602 - 10.602 - 10.602 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Office Boy and Security /g - 3.111 4.317 1.123 - 8.550 - 8.550 - 8.550 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Secretariat - 10.826 15.023 3.907 - 29.755 - 29.755 - 29.755 3. Transport - 9.644 13.382 3.480 - 26.506 - 26.506 - 26.506 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA 4. Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc - 4.822 6.691 1.740 - 13.253 - 13.253 - 13.253 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA 5. Procurement - 10.715 - - - 10.715 - 10.715 - 10.715 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA 6. Telemetric O & M - 2.679 2.788 -- 5.467 - 5.467 - 5.467 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal Project Administration Support - 84.675 101.701 25.724 - 212.099 - 212.099 - 212.099 H. Beneficiaries Contribution 1. Construction Work a. Biogas Plant - - 322.009 84.047 - 406.056 - 406.056 - 406.056 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA b. Biogas Enceng Gondok - - 140.513 36.542 - 177.055 - 177.055 - 177.055 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA c. 3R Garbage Bins - - 234.189 60.903 - 295.092 - 295.092 - 295.092 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA d. River Bank Gardening ------0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA e. Communal Septitanc and WC - - 168.616 48.723 - 217.339 - 217.339 - 217.339 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA f. Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant - - 88.992 24.361 - 113.353 - 113.353 - 113.353 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal onstruction Work - - 954.319 254.576 - 1.208.895 - 1.208.895 - 1.208.895 2. Manpower/cash Biogas Plant - - 60.906 15.887 - 76.793 - 76.793 - 76.793 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Biogas Enceng Gondok - - 26.497 6.891 - 33.388 - 33.388 - 33.388 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA 3R Garbage Bins - - 29.441 7.656 - 37.097 - 37.097 - 37.097 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA River Bank Gardening - - 6.134 -- 6.134 - 6.134 - 6.134 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Communal Septitanc and WC - - 8.096 2.297 - 10.393 - 10.393 - 10.393 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant - - 112.857 30.626 - 143.482 - 143.482 - 143.482 0,0 0,0 0,0 DIBR_CA BC_EA BC_DA BEN ( 100% ) MOE_IA DIBR_PA Subtotal anpower/cash - - 243.930 63.357 - 307.287 - 307.287 - 307.287 Subtotal Beneficiaries Contribution - - 1.198.249 317.933 - 1.516.182 - 1.516.182 - 1.516.182 Total - 943.011 4.120.850 1.008.012 - 6.071.872 311.852 5.325.661 434.359 6.071.872
______\a 4 persons \b 3 persons \c 2 cars \d 3 persons \e 3 persons \f 4 persons \g 2 persons
Page 4 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 12. 4.1. Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Beneficiaries Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Civil Works 1. Construction Works a. Biogas Plant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 409.872 106.979 - 516.851 - - 96.143 25.094 - 121.237 ------b. Biogas Enceng Gondok MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 178.853 46.513 - 225.366 - - 41.953 10.910 - 52.864 ------c. 3R Garbage Bins MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 198.726 51.681 - 250.407 - - 46.615 12.123 - 58.737 ------d. River Bank Gardening MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 49.681 - - 49.681 - - 11.654 - - 11.654 ------e. Communal Septitanc and WC MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 53.656 15.504 - 69.160 - - 12.586 3.637 - 16.223 ------f. Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 755.158 206.724 - 961.882 - - 177.136 48.491 - 225.627 ------Subtotal Construction Works - - 1.645.947 427.401 - 2.073.348 - - 386.086 100.255 - 486.341 ------B. Equipment 1. Telemetric Equipment MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - - 23.778 - - 23.778 - - 6.730 -- 6.730 ------2. Equipment/Furniture MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 15.774 - - - 15.774 - 4.465 - -- 4.465 ------Subtotal Equipment - 15.774 23.778 - - 39.551 - 4.465 6.730 - - 11.195 ------C. Training and Demonstration 1. Training MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 24.573 25.575 26.604 - 76.752 - 6.992 7.277 7.569 - 21.838 ------D. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Part A: Environmental/Water Resources Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 33.782 - - - 33.782 - 7.924 - -- 7.924 ------Part B: Environmental/Water Resources Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 50.674 51.282 - - 101.955 - 11.886 12.029 - - 23.915 ------Part B: Environmental Economist Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 50.674 59.829 - - 110.502 - 11.886 14.034 - - 25.920 ------Subtotal International Professional Staffs - 135.130 111.110 - - 246.240 - 31.697 26.063 - - 57.760 ------b. National Professional Staffs Part A: Team Leader/Environmental Management Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 15.001 - - - 15.001 - 3.519 - -- 3.519 ------Part A: Environmental Economist/Financial Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 5.250 - -- 5.250 - 1.232 - -- 1.232 ------Part A: Water Quality Engineer MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.500 - -- 3.500 - 821 - -- 821 ------Part A: Watershed Management Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.500 - -- 3.500 - 821 - -- 821 ------Part A: Sociologist/Community Empowerment Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.656 - -- 3.656 - 858 - -- 858 ------Part A: Institutional Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.656 - -- 3.656 - 858 - -- 858 ------Part B: Team Leader/Environmental Management Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 22.502 31.225 8.120 - 61.847 - 5.278 7.324 1.905 - 14.507 ------Part B: Environmental Economist/Financial Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 10.501 21.857 4.737 - 37.095 - 2.463 5.127 1.111 - 8.701 ------Part B: Water Quality Engineer MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 8.751 10.929 3.790 - 23.469 - 2.053 2.564 889 - 5.505 ------Part B: Laboratory WQ Expert MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 5.250 5.464 3.790 - 14.504 - 1.232 1.282 889 - 3.402 ------Part B: Watershed Management Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.500 9.107 - - 12.608 - 821 2.136 -- 2.957 ------Part B: Database and GIS Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.500 9.107 1.895 - 14.502 - 821 2.136 444 - 3.402 ------Part B: Information Communication Technology MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.500 7.286 - - 10.786 - 821 1.709 -- 2.530 ------Part B: Sociologist/Community Empowerment Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 10.969 11.416 - - 22.384 - 2.573 2.678 -- 5.251 ------Part B: Institutional Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 5.484 5.708 - - 11.192 - 1.286 1.339 -- 2.625 ------Part B: Solid Waste Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 5.250 5.464 - - 10.715 - 1.232 1.282 -- 2.513 ------Part B: Biogaz Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 5.250 5.464 - - 10.715 - 1.232 1.282 -- 2.513 ------Part B: Training Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 3.656 3.805 -- 7.461 - 858 893 -- 1.750 ------Part B: Quality Control Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 5.484 13.318 - - 18.802 - 1.286 3.124 -- 4.410 ------Part B: Community Contracting Specialist MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 7.312 15.221 - - 22.533 - 1.715 3.570 -- 5.286 ------Subtotal National Professional Staffs - 135.476 155.371 22.331 - 313.178 - 31.778 36.445 5.238 - 73.462 ------Subtotal Remuneration - 270.605 266.482 22.331 - 559.418 - 63.475 62.508 5.238 - 131.222 ------2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 7.239 4.884 - - 12.123 - 1.698 1.146 -- 2.844 ------OSA and Housing MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 24.002 20.296 - - 44.298 - 5.630 4.761 - - 10.391 ------NPS Housing MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 7.001 8.223 1.137 - 16.360 - 1.642 1.929 267 - 3.838 ------Sub-professional and Technical Staffs /a MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 25.204 34.975 9.096 - 69.274 - 5.912 8.204 2.134 - 16.250 ------Supporting Staffs /b MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 10.801 14.988 3.898 - 29.687 - 2.534 3.516 914 - 6.964 ------Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 14.401 19.984 5.197 - 39.582 - 3.378 4.688 1.219 - 9.285 ------Office Furniture and Equipment MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 15.001 - - - 15.001 - 3.519 - -- 3.519 ------Transport /c MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 18.001 24.980 6.496 - 49.478 - 4.223 5.859 1.524 - 11.606 ------Reporting MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 2.500 2.602 -- 5.102 - 586 610 -- 1.197 ------Out-of-station and Various Cost MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 9.001 12.490 3.248 - 24.739 - 2.111 2.930 762 - 5.803 ------Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs - 133.151 143.421 29.072 - 305.644 - 31.233 33.642 6.819 - 71.694 ------Subtotal Consulting Services - 403.756 409.903 51.403 - 865.062 - 94.708 96.150 12.057 - 202.916 ------E. Survey and Investigation 1. Water Sampling and Testing MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 10.238 10.801 - - 21.038 - 2.401 2.533 -- 4.935 ------F. Socialization and Community Development 1. Workshops Districts and Villages MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 26.143 27.581 4.850 - 58.573 - 6.132 6.470 1.138 - 13.739 ------2. Community Meetings/Workshop MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 7.625 8.044 4.243 - 19.913 - 1.789 1.887 995 - 4.671 ------3. CSOs CDD Support Facilitation MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 63.704 67.208 - - 130.912 - 14.943 15.765 - - 30.708 ------4. District Planning Meetings MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 60.782 64.125 22.551 - 147.458 - 14.258 15.042 5.290 - 34.589 ------5. Media Campaign Material MOE_MU DIBR_CCA - 81.043 - - - 81.043 - 19.010 - - - 19.010 ------Subtotal Socialization and Community Development - 239.297 166.958 31.644 - 437.899 - 56.131 39.163 7.423 - 102.717 ------G. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------4.148 5.756 1.497 - 11.400 ------Koordinator Sekretariat /d MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------8.710 12.087 3.143 - 23.941 ------PIU MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------3.318 4.605 1.197 - 9.120 ------Treasury MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------3.007 4.173 1.085 - 8.265 ------Administration Assistant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------2.903 4.029 1.048 - 7.980 ------Technical Assistant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------2.903 4.029 1.048 - 7.980 ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc /e MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------5.600 7.770 2.021 - 15.391 ------PPK MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------3.163 4.389 1.141 - 8.693 ------Pelaksana Teknik MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------2.178 3.022 786 - 5.985 ------Pelaksana Administrasi MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------2.178 3.022 786 - 5.985 ------Counterpart /f MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------7.881 10.936 2.844 - 21.661 ------Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------45.989 63.817 16.596 - 126.403 ------
Page 5 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 12. 4.1. Development and Implementation of a Basin River Quality Improvement Strategy Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Manag. ADB ADF Loan Central Government Beneficiaries Unit Cost Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------3.857 5.353 1.392 - 10.602 ------Computer Operator MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------3.857 5.353 1.392 - 10.602 ------Office Boy and Security /g MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------3.111 4.317 1.123 - 8.550 ------Subtotal Secretariat ------10.826 15.023 3.907 - 29.755 ------3. Transport MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------9.644 13.382 3.480 - 26.506 ------4. Office Rent, Communication, Running Cost etc MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------4.822 6.691 1.740 - 13.253 ------5. Procurement MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------10.715 - - - 10.715 ------6. Telemetric O & M MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------2.679 2.788 -- 5.467 ------Subtotal Project Administration Support ------84.675 101.701 25.724 - 212.099 ------H. Beneficiaries Contribution 1. Construction Work a. Biogas Plant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------322.009 84.047 - 406.056 b. Biogas Enceng Gondok MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------140.513 36.542 - 177.055 c. 3R Garbage Bins MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------234.189 60.903 - 295.092 d. River Bank Gardening MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------e. Communal Septitanc and WC MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------168.616 48.723 - 217.339 f. Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------88.992 24.361 - 113.353 Subtotal onstruction Work ------954.319 254.576 - 1.208.895 2. Manpower/cash Biogas Plant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------60.906 15.887 - 76.793 Biogas Enceng Gondok MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------26.497 6.891 - 33.388 3R Garbage Bins MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------29.441 7.656 - 37.097 River Bank Gardening MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------6.134 -- 6.134 Communal Septitanc and WC MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------8.096 2.297 - 10.393 Communal/Individual Waste Water Plant MOE_MU DIBR_CCA ------112.857 30.626 - 143.482 Subtotal anpower/cash ------243.930 63.357 - 307.287 Subtotal Beneficiaries Contribution ------1.198.249 317.933 - 1.516.182 Total - 693.638 2.282.960 537.051 - 3.513.650 - 249.372 639.641 153.027 - 1.042.041 - - 1.198.249 317.933 - 1.516.182
______\a 4 persons \b 3 persons \c 2 cars \d 3 persons \e 3 persons \f 4 persons \g 2 persons
Page 6
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 8.1 - Program Management (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 16. 8.1. Program Management Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Vehicles and Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture package 1 - - - - 1 168,795,000 18,150 18.150 - - - - 18.150 B. Training and Demonstration 1. Training on PPMS, DCS and QMM time 1 - - - - 1 51,150,000 5,500 5.500 - - - - 5.500 2. Training on Information System time 1 - - - - 1 30,690,000 3,300 3.300 - - - - 3.300 Subtotal Training and Demonstration 8.800 - - - - 8.800 C. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist man-months 3 6 6 6 - 21 179,025,000 19,250 57.750 115.500 115.500 115.500 - 404.250 Technical QA Specialist man-months - 3 3 - - 6 179,025,000 19,250 - 57.750 57.750 - - 115.500 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist man-months - 3 3 - - 6 179,025,000 19,250 - 57.750 57.750 - - 115.500 Subtotal International Professional Staffs 57.750 231.000 231.000 115.500 - 635.250 b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader/Programming and Budgeting Specialist man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 25,575,000 2,750 8.250 33.000 33.000 33.000 33.000 140.250 Technical QA Specialist /a man-months - 4 3 3 - 10 22,506,000 2,420 - 9.680 7.260 7.260 - 24.200 GIS/Information System Specialist man-months 3 6 3 - - 12 17,902,500 1,925 5.775 11.550 5.775 - - 23.100 Social and Environmental Safeguards Specialist man-months 3 6 6 3 - 18 22,506,000 2,420 7.260 14.520 14.520 7.260 - 43.560 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist man-months - 7 6 6 - 19 22,506,000 2,420 - 16.940 14.520 14.520 - 45.980 CSO Specialist man-months 3 8 8 7 7 33 17,902,500 1,925 5.775 15.400 15.400 13.475 13.475 63.525 Financial Specialist man-months 3 5 5 - - 13 17,902,500 1,925 5.775 9.625 9.625 - - 25.025 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 32.835 110.715 100.100 75.515 46.475 365.640 Subtotal Remuneration 90.585 341.715 331.100 191.015 46.475 1.000.890 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips 1 3 3 1 - 8 30,690,000 3,300 3.300 9.900 9.900 3.300 - 26.400 OSA and Housing days 90 360 360 180 - 990 1,023,000 110 9.900 39.600 39.600 19.800 - 108.900 IPS Housing (monthly base) months ------NPS Housing months 15 48 43 31 19 156 1,278,750 138 2.063 6.600 5.913 4.263 2.613 21.450 Support staffs /b mm 9 36 36 36 36 153 4,092,000 440 3.960 15.840 15.840 15.840 15.840 67.320 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months 3 12 12 12 12 51 33,759,000 3,630 10.890 43.560 43.560 43.560 43.560 185.130 Office Furniture and Equipment package 1 - - - - 1 409,200,000 44,000 44.000 - - - - 44.000 Transport /c months 6 24 24 24 24 102 10,230,000 1,100 6.600 26.400 26.400 26.400 26.400 112.200 Reporting times - 1 1 1 1 4 51,150,000 5,500 - 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.500 22.000 Purchase of Documents, Satelite Image etc package 1 - - - - 1 255,750,000 27,500 27.500 - - - - 27.500 Out-of-station and Various Costs /d months 3 12 12 12 12 51 10,230,000 1,100 3.300 13.200 13.200 13.200 13.200 56.100 On-line Development package 1 - - - - 1 102,300,000 11,000 11.000 - - - - 11.000 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 122.513 160.600 159.913 131.863 107.113 682.000 Subtotal Consulting Services 213.098 502.315 491.013 322.878 153.588 1.682.890 D. Socialization and Community Development 1. Socialization by Information Media times 1 1 1 1 - 4 102,300,000 11,000 11.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 - 44.000 E. Project Coordination and Management 1. PIU Coordination Meeting /e times 4 4 4 4 4 20 10,230,000 1,100 4.400 4.400 4.400 4.400 4.400 22.000 2. Consinyering /f times 1 1 1 - - 3 51,150,000 5,500 5.500 5.500 5.500 - - 16.500 3. Workshops /g times 1 1 1 1 1 5 102,300,000 11,000 11.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 55.000 4. CSO Consinyering /h times 3 3 3 3 3 15 102,300,000 11,000 33.000 33.000 33.000 33.000 33.000 165.000 5. Preparation of Project Completion Report package - - - - 1 1 220,000,000 23,656 - - - - 23.656 23.656 Subtotal Project Coordination and Management 53.900 53.900 53.900 48.400 72.056 282.156 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA - Head of BBWSC man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 4,000,000 430 1.290 5.161 5.161 5.161 5.161 21.935 Koordinator Sekretariat PCMU man-months 9 36 36 36 36 153 2,800,000 301 2.710 10.839 10.839 10.839 10.839 46.065 PIU - BBWSC man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 3,200,000 344 1.032 4.129 4.129 4.129 4.129 17.548 Treasury man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 2,900,000 312 935 3.742 3.742 3.742 3.742 15.903 Administration Assistant man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 3.613 3.613 15.355 Technical Assistant man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 2,800,000 301 903 3.613 3.613 3.613 3.613 15.355 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 1,800,000 194 581 2.323 2.323 2.323 2.323 9.871 PPK-1 man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 3,050,000 328 984 3.935 3.935 3.935 3.935 16.726 Pelaksana Administrasi man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 11.516 Pelaksana Teknik man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 2,100,000 226 677 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 11.516 Counterpart /i man-months 12 48 48 48 48 204 1,900,000 204 2.452 9.806 9.806 9.806 9.806 41.677 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 13.145 52.581 52.581 52.581 52.581 223.468 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 3,720,000 400 1.200 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 20.400 Computer Operator man-months 3 12 12 12 12 51 3,720,000 400 1.200 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 20.400 Office Boy and Security /j man-months 6 24 24 24 24 102 1,500,000 161 968 3.871 3.871 3.871 3.871 16.452 Subtotal Secretariat 3.368 13.471 13.471 13.471 13.471 57.252 3. Transport months 3 12 12 12 12 51 9,300,000 1,000 3.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 51.000 4. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months 3 12 12 12 12 51 4,650,000 500 1.500 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 25.500 5. Procurement package 1 - - - - 1 93,000,000 10,000 10.000 - - - - 10.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support 31.013 84.052 84.052 84.052 84.052 367.219 Total 335.960 651.267 639.964 466.329 309.695 2.403.215
______\a quality assurance \b 3 persons \c 2 cars \d $1000 per month \e 30 persons \f 3 times x 3 days x 30 persons \g 1 time/year @ 50 persons \h 3 times/year @ 50 persons including KPK \i 4 persons \j 2 persons
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Parameters (in %) Table 16. 8.1. Program Management Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Phy. Summary Divisions Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) Local (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule
I. Investment Costs A. Vehicles and Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture 19.481 - - - - 19.481 9.662 7.871 1.948 19.481 5,0 50,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) B. Training and Demonstration 1. Training on PPMS, DCS and QMM 5.963 - - - - 5.963 - 5.366 596 5.963 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) 2. Training on Information System 3.578 - - - - 3.578 - 3.220 358 3.578 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_T&D_EA TD_DA ADF (77.85% ) Subtotal Training and Demonstration 9.540 - - - - 9.540 - 8.586 954 9.540 C. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist 61.486 125.419 126.924 128.447 - 442.276 398.048 - 44.228 442.276 5,0 90,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Technical QA Specialist - 62.709 63.462 - - 126.171 113.554 - 12.617 126.171 5,0 90,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist - 62.709 63.462 - - 126.171 113.554 - 12.617 126.171 5,0 90,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal International Professional Staffs 61.486 250.837 253.847 128.447 - 694.618 625.156 - 69.462 694.618 b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader/Programming and Budgeting Specialist 8.944 37.917 40.003 42.203 44.524 173.590 - 156.231 17.359 173.590 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Technical QA Specialist /a - 11.122 8.801 9.285 - 29.207 - 26.287 2.921 29.207 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) GIS/Information System Specialist 6.261 13.271 7.000 - - 26.532 - 23.879 2.653 26.532 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Social and Environmental Safeguards Specialist 7.871 16.684 17.601 9.285 - 51.440 - 46.296 5.144 51.440 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist - 19.464 17.601 18.569 - 55.634 - 50.071 5.563 55.634 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) CSO Specialist 6.261 17.695 18.668 17.233 18.181 78.037 - 70.233 7.804 78.037 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Financial Specialist 6.261 11.059 11.667 - - 28.987 - 26.089 2.899 28.987 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal National Professional Staffs 35.597 127.212 121.341 96.574 62.704 443.428 - 399.085 44.343 443.428 Subtotal Remuneration 97.084 378.049 375.188 225.021 62.704 1.138.046 625.156 399.085 113.805 1.138.046 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel 3.514 10.750 10.879 3.670 - 28.813 25.931 - 2.881 28.813 5,0 90,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) OSA and Housing 10.733 45.500 48.003 25.322 - 129.558 - 116.602 12.956 129.558 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) IPS Housing (monthly base) ------5,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) NPS Housing 2.236 7.583 7.167 5.451 3.525 25.963 - 23.366 2.596 25.963 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Support staffs /b 4.293 18.200 19.201 20.257 21.371 83.323 - 74.991 8.332 83.323 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc 11.806 50.051 52.803 55.707 58.771 229.139 - 206.225 22.914 229.139 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Office Furniture and Equipment 47.702 - - - - 47.702 - 42.931 4.770 47.702 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Transport /c 7.155 30.334 32.002 33.762 35.619 138.872 - 124.985 13.887 138.872 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Reporting - 6.320 6.667 7.034 7.421 27.441 - 24.697 2.744 27.441 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Purchase of Documents, Satelite Image etc 29.813 - - - - 29.813 - 26.832 2.981 29.813 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Out-of-station and Various Costs /d 3.578 15.167 16.001 16.881 17.810 69.436 - 62.492 6.944 69.436 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) On-line Development 11.925 - - - - 11.925 - 10.733 1.193 11.925 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 132.755 183.905 192.724 168.084 144.517 821.985 25.931 713.855 82.198 821.985 Subtotal Consulting Services 229.838 561.954 567.912 393.105 207.221 1.960.031 651.088 1.112.940 196.003 1.960.031 D. Socialization and Community Development 1. Socialization by Information Media 11.925 12.639 13.334 14.068 - 51.966 - 46.769 5.197 51.966 5,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_SCD_EA SCD_DA ADF (81% ) E. Project Coordination and Management 1. PIU Coordination Meeting /e 4.543 4.815 5.080 5.359 5.654 25.450 - 22.905 2.545 25.450 0,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 2. Consinyering /f 5.679 6.019 6.350 - - 18.047 - 16.242 1.805 18.047 0,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 3. Workshops /g 11.358 12.037 12.699 13.398 14.135 63.626 - 57.263 6.363 63.626 0,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 4. CSO Consinyering /h 34.073 36.111 38.098 40.193 42.404 190.878 - 171.790 19.088 190.878 0,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) 5. Preparation of Project Completion Report - - - - 30.397 30.397 - 27.357 3.040 30.397 0,0 0,0 10,0 PM_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) Subtotal Project Coordination and Management 55.652 58.982 62.226 58.950 92.589 328.398 - 295.559 32.840 328.398 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA - Head of BBWSC 1.332 5.648 5.959 6.286 6.632 25.857 - 25.857 - 25.857 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Koordinator Sekretariat PCMU 2.798 11.861 12.513 13.201 13.927 54.300 - 54.300 - 54.300 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT PIU - BBWSC 1.066 4.518 4.767 5.029 5.306 20.686 - 20.686 - 20.686 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Treasury 966 4.095 4.320 4.558 4.808 18.746 - 18.746 - 18.746 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Administration Assistant 933 3.954 4.171 4.400 4.642 18.100 - 18.100 - 18.100 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Technical Assistant 933 3.954 4.171 4.400 4.642 18.100 - 18.100 - 18.100 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc 600 2.542 2.681 2.829 2.984 11.636 - 11.636 - 11.636 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT PPK-1 1.016 4.307 4.543 4.793 5.057 19.716 - 19.716 - 19.716 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Pelaksana Administrasi 699 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 13.575 - 13.575 - 13.575 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Pelaksana Teknik 699 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 13.575 - 13.575 - 13.575 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Counterpart /i 2.531 10.731 11.321 11.944 12.601 49.128 - 49.128 - 49.128 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 13.572 57.538 60.703 64.042 67.564 263.419 - 263.419 - 263.419 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager 1.239 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 24.047 - 24.047 - 24.047 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Computer Operator 1.239 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 24.047 - 24.047 - 24.047 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Office Boy and Security /j 999 4.236 4.469 4.715 4.974 19.393 - 19.393 - 19.393 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Subtotal Secretariat 3.477 14.741 15.552 16.407 17.310 67.487 - 67.487 - 67.487 3. Transport 3.098 13.131 13.854 14.616 15.419 60.118 - 60.118 - 60.118 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT 4. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc 1.549 6.566 6.927 7.308 7.710 30.059 - 30.059 - 30.059 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT 5. Procurement 10.325 - - - - 10.325 - 10.325 - 10.325 0,0 0,0 0,0 PM_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT Subtotal Project Administration Support 32.021 91.977 97.035 102.372 108.003 431.408 - 431.408 - 431.408 Total 358.458 725.552 740.508 568.494 407.813 2.800.824 660.750 1.903.133 236.942 2.800.824
______\a quality assurance \b 3 persons \c 2 cars \d $1000 per month \e 30 persons \f 3 times x 3 days x 30 persons \g 1 time/year @ 50 persons \h 3 times/year @ 50 persons including KPK \i 4 persons \j 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 16. 8.1. Program Management Other Accounts Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs Impl. Proj. Manag. Cost ADB ADF Loan Central Government Agency Area Unit Center 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Vehicles and Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 15.183 - - - - 15.183 4.298 - - - - 4.298 B. Training and Demonstration 1. Training on PPMS, DCS and QMM PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 4.642 - - - - 4.642 1.321 - - - - 1.321 2. Training on Information System PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 2.785 - - - - 2.785 792 - - - - 792 Subtotal Training and Demonstration 7.427 - - - - 7.427 2.113 - - - - 2.113 C. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Team Leader/Integrated Water Resources Management Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 49.804 101.589 102.808 104.042 - 358.243 11.682 23.830 24.116 24.405 - 84.032 Technical QA Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA - 50.795 51.404 - - 102.199 - 11.915 12.058 - - 23.973 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA - 50.795 51.404 - - 102.199 - 11.915 12.058 - - 23.973 Subtotal International Professional Staffs 49.804 203.178 205.616 104.042 - 562.641 11.682 47.659 48.231 24.405 - 131.977 b. National Professional Staffs Deputy Team Leader/Programming and Budgeting Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 7.245 30.713 32.402 34.184 36.064 140.608 1.699 7.204 7.600 8.019 8.460 32.982 Technical QA Specialist /a PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA - 9.009 7.128 7.521 - 23.658 - 2.113 1.672 1.764 - 5.549 GIS/Information System Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 5.071 10.749 5.670 - - 21.491 1.190 2.521 1.330 - - 5.041 Social and Environmental Safeguards Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 6.375 13.514 14.257 7.521 - 41.666 1.495 3.170 3.344 1.764 - 9.774 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA - 15.766 14.257 15.041 - 45.064 - 3.698 3.344 3.528 - 10.571 CSO Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 5.071 14.333 15.121 13.959 14.726 63.210 1.190 3.362 3.547 3.274 3.454 14.827 Financial Specialist PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 5.071 8.958 9.451 - - 23.480 1.190 2.101 2.217 - - 5.508 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 28.834 103.042 98.286 78.225 50.791 359.177 6.763 24.170 23.055 18.349 11.914 84.251 Subtotal Remuneration 78.638 306.220 303.903 182.267 50.791 921.817 18.446 71.829 71.286 42.754 11.914 216.229 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 2.846 8.708 8.812 2.973 - 23.338 668 2.043 2.067 697 - 5.474 OSA and Housing PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 8.694 36.855 38.882 20.510 - 104.942 2.039 8.645 9.121 4.811 - 24.616 IPS Housing (monthly base) PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------NPS Housing PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 1.811 6.143 5.805 4.415 2.855 21.030 425 1.441 1.362 1.036 670 4.933 Support staffs /b PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 3.477 14.742 15.553 16.408 17.311 67.492 816 3.458 3.648 3.849 4.061 15.831 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 9.563 40.541 42.771 45.123 47.605 185.602 2.243 9.510 10.033 10.584 11.167 43.536 Office Furniture and Equipment PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 38.638 - - - - 38.638 9.063 - - - - 9.063 Transport /c PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 5.796 24.570 25.922 27.347 28.851 112.486 1.359 5.763 6.080 6.415 6.768 26.386 Reporting PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA - 5.119 5.400 5.697 6.011 22.227 - 1.201 1.267 1.336 1.410 5.214 Purchase of Documents, Satelite Image etc PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 24.149 - - - - 24.149 5.665 - - - - 5.665 Out-of-station and Various Costs /d PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 2.898 12.285 12.961 13.674 14.426 56.243 680 2.882 3.040 3.207 3.384 13.193 On-line Development PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 9.660 - - - - 9.660 2.266 - - - - 2.266 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 107.531 148.963 156.106 136.148 117.059 665.807 25.223 34.942 36.618 31.936 27.458 156.177 Subtotal Consulting Services 186.169 455.183 460.009 318.415 167.849 1.587.625 43.669 106.771 107.903 74.690 39.372 372.406 D. Socialization and Community Development 1. Socialization by Information Media PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 9.660 10.238 10.801 11.395 - 42.093 2.266 2.401 2.533 2.673 - 9.874 E. Project Coordination and Management 1. PIU Coordination Meeting /e PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 3.680 3.900 4.115 4.341 4.580 20.615 863 915 965 1.018 1.074 4.836 2. Consinyering /f PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 4.600 4.875 5.143 - - 14.618 1.079 1.144 1.206 - - 3.429 3. Workshops /g PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 9.200 9.750 10.286 10.852 11.449 51.537 2.158 2.287 2.413 2.546 2.686 12.089 4. CSO Consinyering /h PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA 27.599 29.250 30.859 32.556 34.347 154.611 6.474 6.861 7.239 7.637 8.057 36.267 5. Preparation of Project Completion Report PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA - - - - 24.621 24.621 - - - - 5.775 5.775 Subtotal Project Coordination and Management 45.078 47.775 50.403 47.749 74.997 266.003 10.574 11.207 11.823 11.200 17.592 62.396 F. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA - Head of BBWSC PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------1.332 5.648 5.959 6.286 6.632 25.857 Koordinator Sekretariat PCMU PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------2.798 11.861 12.513 13.201 13.927 54.300 PIU - BBWSC PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------1.066 4.518 4.767 5.029 5.306 20.686 Treasury PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------966 4.095 4.320 4.558 4.808 18.746 Administration Assistant PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 4.400 4.642 18.100 Technical Assistant PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------933 3.954 4.171 4.400 4.642 18.100 Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------600 2.542 2.681 2.829 2.984 11.636 PPK-1 PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------1.016 4.307 4.543 4.793 5.057 19.716 Pelaksana Administrasi PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------699 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 13.575 Pelaksana Teknik PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------699 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 13.575 Counterpart /i PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------2.531 10.731 11.321 11.944 12.601 49.128 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------13.572 57.538 60.703 64.042 67.564 263.419 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------1.239 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 24.047 Computer Operator PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------1.239 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 24.047 Office Boy and Security /j PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------999 4.236 4.469 4.715 4.974 19.393 Subtotal Secretariat ------3.477 14.741 15.552 16.407 17.310 67.487 3. Transport PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------3.098 13.131 13.854 14.616 15.419 60.118 4. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------1.549 6.566 6.927 7.308 7.710 30.059 5. Procurement PCMU_IA PM_PA PCMU_MU PM_CCA ------10.325 - - - - 10.325 Subtotal Project Administration Support ------32.021 91.977 97.035 102.372 108.003 431.408 Total 263.517 513.196 521.213 377.559 242.846 1.918.331 94.941 212.356 219.295 190.935 164.967 882.494
______\a quality assurance \b 3 persons \c 2 cars \d $1000 per month \e 30 persons \f 3 times x 3 days x 30 persons \g 1 time/year @ 50 persons \h 3 times/year @ 50 persons including KPK \i 4 persons \j 2 persons
Page 3
Supplementary Appendix 5 - Detailed cost estimates, financing plan and allocation for Project 1 Loan Funded Sub Component 8.2 - Independent Monitoring and Evaluation (Costab Ouputs)
ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 17. 8.2. Independent Monitoring and Evaluation Detailed Costs Quantities Unit Cost Unit Cost Base Cost (US$) Unit 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Rupiah) (US$) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Vehicles and Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture package ------B. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Project Evaluation Specialist man-months 3 2 2 2 4 13 179,025,000 19,250 57.750 38.500 38.500 38.500 77.000 250.250 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist man-months ------Subtotal International Professional Staffs 57.750 38.500 38.500 38.500 77.000 250.250 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader - PPMS/Monitoring and Evaluation Spec. man-months 6 6 6 6 6 30 25,575,000 2,750 16.500 16.500 16.500 16.500 16.500 82.500 Project Evaluation - Economist man-months 6 6 6 6 6 30 25,575,000 2,750 16.500 16.500 16.500 16.500 16.500 82.500 Sociologist/CBD/CDD Specialist man-months 3 3 3 3 3 15 25,575,000 2,750 8.250 8.250 8.250 8.250 8.250 41.250 Assistants /a man-months 36 36 36 36 36 180 12,276,000 1,320 47.520 47.520 47.520 47.520 47.520 237.600 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 88.770 88.770 88.770 88.770 88.770 443.850 Subtotal Remuneration 146.520 127.270 127.270 127.270 165.770 694.100 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel R-trips 1 1 1 1 1 5 30,690,000 3,300 3.300 3.300 3.300 3.300 3.300 16.500 OSA and Housing days 90 60 60 60 120 390 1,023,000 110 9.900 6.600 6.600 6.600 13.200 42.900 NPS Housing months 15 15 15 15 15 75 1,278,750 138 2.063 2.063 2.063 2.063 2.063 10.313 Sub-professional Staffs man-months 6 6 6 6 6 30 7,161,000 770 4.620 4.620 4.620 4.620 4.620 23.100 Support Staffs /b man-months 12 12 12 12 12 60 4,092,000 440 5.280 5.280 5.280 5.280 5.280 26.400 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months 6 6 6 6 6 30 4,092,000 440 2.640 2.640 2.640 2.640 2.640 13.200 Office Furniture and Equipment package 0,8 0,05 0,05 0,05 0,05 1 61,380,000 6,600 5.280 330 330 330 330 6.600 Transport months 6 6 6 6 6 30 10,230,000 1,100 6.600 6.600 6.600 6.600 6.600 33.000 Reporting times 1 1 1 1 1 5 20,460,000 2,200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 11.000 Out-of-station and Various Costs /c months 6 6 6 6 6 30 10,230,000 1,100 6.600 6.600 6.600 6.600 6.600 33.000 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 48.483 40.233 40.233 40.233 46.833 216.013 3. Workshop/Seminar Workshop/Seminar times 1 - - - 1 2 102,300,000 11,000 11.000 - - - 11.000 22.000 Subtotal Consulting Services 206.003 167.503 167.503 167.503 223.603 932.113 C. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meetings times 2 2 2 2 2 10 10,230,000 1,100 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 11.000 D. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA man-months ------Koordinator Sekretariat RCMU man-months ------PIU man-months ------Treasury man-months ------Administration Assistant man-months ------Technical Assistant man-months ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc man-months ------PPK-1 man-months ------Pelaksana Administrasi /d man-months 12 12 12 12 12 60 2,100,000 226 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 13.548 Pelaksana Teknik /e man-months 12 12 12 12 12 60 2,100,000 226 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 2.710 13.548 Counterpart /f man-months 48 48 48 48 48 240 1,900,000 204 9.806 9.806 9.806 9.806 9.806 49.032 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 15.226 15.226 15.226 15.226 15.226 76.129 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager man-months 12 12 12 12 12 60 3,720,000 400 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 24.000 Computer Operator man-months ------Office Boy and Security /g man-months ------Subtotal Secretariat 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 4.800 24.000 3. Transport months 12 12 12 12 12 60 9,300,000 1,000 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 60.000 4. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc months 12 12 12 12 12 60 4,650,000 500 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 30.000 5. Procurement package 1 - - - - 1 18,600,000 2,000 2.000 - - - - 2.000 Subtotal Project Administration Support 40.026 38.026 38.026 38.026 38.026 192.129 Total 248.228 207.728 207.728 207.728 263.828 1.135.242
______\a 6 persons \b 2 persons \c $1000 per month \d 2 persons \e persons \f 8 persons \g 2 persons
Page 1 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Breakdown of Totals Incl. Cont. (US$) Parameters (in %) Table 17. 8.2. Independent Monitoring and Evaluation Local Phy. Summary Divisions Other Accounts Detailed Costs Totals Including Contingencies (US$) (Excl. Duties & Cont. For. Gross Expenditure Disb. Impl. Proj. Manag. Cost 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Component Account Acct. Fin. Rule Agency Area Unit Center
I. Investment Costs A. Vehicles and Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture ------5,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA ADF_EQUI_EA VE_DA ADF (77.9387% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA B. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Project Evaluation Specialist 61.486 41.806 42.308 42.816 86.659 275.075 247.567 - 27.507 275.075 5,0 90,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist ------5,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal International Professional Staffs 61.486 41.806 42.308 42.816 86.659 275.075 247.567 - 27.507 275.075 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader - PPMS/Monitoring and Evaluation Spec. 17.888 18.959 20.001 21.101 22.262 100.211 - 90.190 10.021 100.211 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Project Evaluation - Economist 17.888 18.959 20.001 21.101 22.262 100.211 - 90.190 10.021 100.211 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Sociologist/CBD/CDD Specialist 8.944 9.479 10.001 10.551 11.131 50.106 - 45.095 5.011 50.106 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Assistants /a 51.518 54.601 57.604 60.772 64.114 288.608 - 259.747 28.861 288.608 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal National Professional Staffs 96.238 101.997 107.607 113.525 119.769 539.135 - 485.222 53.914 539.135 Subtotal Remuneration 157.724 143.803 149.915 156.341 206.428 814.210 247.567 485.222 81.421 814.210 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel 3.514 3.583 3.626 3.670 3.714 18.107 16.296 - 1.811 18.107 5,0 90,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA OSA and Housing 10.733 7.583 8.001 8.441 17.810 52.567 - 47.310 5.257 52.567 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA NPS Housing 2.236 2.370 2.500 2.638 2.783 12.526 - 11.274 1.253 12.526 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Sub-professional Staffs 5.009 5.308 5.600 5.908 6.233 28.059 - 25.253 2.806 28.059 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Support Staffs /b 5.724 6.067 6.400 6.752 7.124 32.068 - 28.861 3.207 32.068 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc 2.862 3.033 3.200 3.376 3.562 16.034 - 14.430 1.603 16.034 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Office Furniture and Equipment 5.724 379 400 422 445 7.371 - 6.634 737 7.371 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Transport 7.155 7.583 8.001 8.441 8.905 40.084 - 36.076 4.008 40.084 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Reporting 2.385 2.528 2.667 2.814 2.968 13.361 - 12.025 1.336 13.361 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Out-of-station and Various Costs /c 7.155 7.583 8.001 8.441 8.905 40.084 - 36.076 4.008 40.084 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 52.497 46.019 48.396 50.902 62.448 260.262 16.296 217.939 26.026 260.262 3. Workshop/Seminar Workshop/Seminar 11.925 - - - 14.841 26.767 - 24.090 2.677 26.767 5,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_CS_OCS_EA CS_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal Consulting Services 222.147 189.822 198.310 207.242 283.717 1.101.239 263.864 727.251 110.124 1.101.239 C. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meetings 2.272 2.407 2.540 2.680 2.827 12.725 - 11.453 1.273 12.725 0,0 0,0 10,0 IME_CA ADF_PCM_EA PCM_DA ADF (81% ) RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA D. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Koordinator Sekretariat RCMU ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA PIU ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Treasury ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Administration Assistant ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Technical Assistant ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA PPK-1 ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Pelaksana Administrasi /d 2.798 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 15.673 - 15.673 - 15.673 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Pelaksana Teknik /e 2.798 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 15.673 - 15.673 - 15.673 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Counterpart /f 10.125 10.731 11.321 11.944 12.601 56.722 - 56.722 - 56.722 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management 15.721 16.661 17.578 18.545 19.565 88.069 - 88.069 - 88.069 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager 4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 - 27.764 - 27.764 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Computer Operator ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Office Boy and Security /g ------0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal Secretariat 4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 - 27.764 - 27.764 3. Transport 12.390 13.131 13.854 14.616 15.419 69.410 - 69.410 - 69.410 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA 4. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc 6.195 6.566 6.927 7.308 7.710 34.705 - 34.705 - 34.705 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA 5. Procurement 2.065 - - - - 2.065 - 2.065 - 2.065 0,0 0,0 0,0 IME_CA PAS_EA PAS_DA GOVT RCMU_IA PM_PA RCMU_MU IME_CCA Subtotal Project Administration Support 41.327 41.611 43.900 46.314 48.862 222.013 - 222.013 - 222.013 Total 265.745 233.841 244.750 256.236 335.406 1.335.977 263.864 960.717 111.396 1.335.977
______\a 6 persons \b 2 persons \c $1000 per month \d 2 persons \e persons \f 8 persons \g 2 persons
Page 2 ICWRMIP Details 090724 (loan).xls
Indonesia ICWRMIP Project 1 Table 17. 8.2. Independent Monitoring and Evaluation Expenditures by Financiers (US$) Detailed Costs ADB ADF Loan Central Government 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
I. Investment Costs A. Vehicles and Equipment 1. Equipment/Furniture ------B. Consulting Services 1. Remuneration a. International Professional Staffs Project Evaluation Specialist 49.804 33.863 34.269 34.681 70.194 222.811 11.682 7.943 8.039 8.135 16.465 52.264 Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist ------Subtotal International Professional Staffs 49.804 33.863 34.269 34.681 70.194 222.811 11.682 7.943 8.039 8.135 16.465 52.264 b. National Professional Staffs Team Leader - PPMS/Monitoring and Evaluation Spec. 14.489 15.356 16.201 17.092 18.032 81.171 3.399 3.602 3.800 4.009 4.230 19.040 Project Evaluation - Economist 14.489 15.356 16.201 17.092 18.032 81.171 3.399 3.602 3.800 4.009 4.230 19.040 Sociologist/CBD/CDD Specialist 7.245 7.678 8.101 8.546 9.016 40.585 1.699 1.801 1.900 2.005 2.115 9.520 Assistants /a 41.729 44.226 46.659 49.225 51.933 233.772 9.788 10.374 10.945 11.547 12.182 54.835 Subtotal National Professional Staffs 77.953 82.617 87.161 91.955 97.013 436.700 18.285 19.379 20.445 21.570 22.756 102.436 Subtotal Remuneration 127.757 116.481 121.431 126.636 167.206 659.510 29.968 27.323 28.484 29.705 39.221 154.700 2. Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs International Travel 2.846 2.903 2.937 2.973 3.008 14.667 668 681 689 697 706 3.440 OSA and Housing 8.694 6.143 6.480 6.837 14.426 42.579 2.039 1.441 1.520 1.604 3.384 9.988 NPS Housing 1.811 1.920 2.025 2.137 2.254 10.146 425 450 475 501 529 2.380 Sub-professional Staffs 4.057 4.300 4.536 4.786 5.049 22.728 952 1.009 1.064 1.123 1.184 5.331 Support Staffs /b 4.637 4.914 5.184 5.469 5.770 25.975 1.088 1.153 1.216 1.283 1.354 6.093 Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc 2.318 2.457 2.592 2.735 2.885 12.987 544 576 608 641 677 3.046 Office Furniture and Equipment 4.637 307 324 342 361 5.970 1.088 72 76 80 85 1.400 Transport 5.796 6.143 6.480 6.837 7.213 32.468 1.359 1.441 1.520 1.604 1.692 7.616 Reporting 1.932 2.048 2.160 2.279 2.404 10.823 453 480 507 535 564 2.539 Out-of-station and Various Costs /c 5.796 6.143 6.480 6.837 7.213 32.468 1.359 1.441 1.520 1.604 1.692 7.616 Subtotal Travel, Housing, Office, Transport and Other Costs 42.523 37.275 39.201 41.230 50.583 210.812 9.974 8.744 9.195 9.671 11.865 49.450 3. Workshop/Seminar Workshop/Seminar 9.660 - - - 12.021 21.681 2.266 - - - 2.820 5.086 Subtotal Consulting Services 179.939 153.756 160.632 167.866 229.811 892.003 42.208 36.066 37.679 39.376 53.906 209.235 C. Project Coordination and Management 1. Coordination Meetings 1.840 1.950 2.057 2.170 2.290 10.307 432 457 483 509 537 2.418 D. Project Administration Support 1. Salaries for Project Financial Management KPA ------Koordinator Sekretariat RCMU ------PIU ------Treasury ------Administration Assistant ------Technical Assistant ------Urusan Pengujian, Verifikasi etc ------PPK-1 ------Pelaksana Administrasi /d ------2.798 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 15.673 Pelaksana Teknik /e ------2.798 2.965 3.128 3.300 3.482 15.673 Counterpart /f ------10.125 10.731 11.321 11.944 12.601 56.722 Subtotal Salaries for Project Financial Management ------15.721 16.661 17.578 18.545 19.565 88.069 2. Secretariat Secretary/Office Manager ------4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 Computer Operator ------Office Boy and Security /g ------Subtotal Secretariat ------4.956 5.253 5.541 5.846 6.168 27.764 3. Transport ------12.390 13.131 13.854 14.616 15.419 69.410 4. Office Rental, Communication, Running Cost etc ------6.195 6.566 6.927 7.308 7.710 34.705 5. Procurement ------2.065 - - - - 2.065 Subtotal Project Administration Support ------41.327 41.611 43.900 46.314 48.862 222.013 Total 181.779 155.706 162.689 170.037 232.101 902.311 83.966 78.135 82.061 86.199 103.305 433.667
______\a 6 persons \b 2 persons \c $1000 per month \d 2 persons \e persons \f 8 persons \g 2 persons
Page 3