Translational Preclinical Pharmacologic Disease Models for Ophthalmic Drug Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translational Preclinical Pharmacologic Disease Models for Ophthalmic Drug Development Pharm Res (2019) 36: 58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-019-2588-5 EXPERT REVIEW Translational Preclinical Pharmacologic Disease Models for Ophthalmic Drug Development Mihir Shah1 & Sara Cabrera-Ghayouri 1 & Lori-Ann Christie 1 & Katherine S. Held 1 & Veena Viswanath1 Received: 30 August 2018 /Accepted: 8 February 2019 /Published online: 25 February 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 ABSTRACT Preclinical models of human diseases are criti- ABBREVIATIONS cal to our understanding of disease etiology, pathology, and AAA Alpha-aminoadipic acid progression and enable the development of effective treat- AMD Age-related macular degeneration ments. An ideal model of human disease should capture ana- Ang1 Angiopoietin-1 tomical features and pathophysiological mechanisms, mimic Ang2 Angiopoietin-2 the progression pattern, and should be amenable to evaluating AqH Aqueous humor translational endpoints and treatment approaches. Preclinical BCVA Best corrected visual acuity animal models have been developed for a variety of human C5 Complement factor 5 ophthalmological diseases to mirror disease mechanisms, CFD Complement factor D location of the affected region in the eye and severity. CNV Choroidal neovascularization These models offer clues to aid in our fundamental CSME Clinically-significant macular edema understanding of disease pathogenesis and enable pro- DED Dry eye disease gression of new therapies to clinical development by DME Diabetic macular edema providing an opportunity to gain proof of concept DR Diabetic retinopathy (POC). Here, we review preclinical animal models asso- DRSS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale ciated with development of new therapies for diseases of ECM Extracellular matrix the ocular surface, glaucoma, presbyopia, and retinal ERG Electroretinography diseases, including diabetic retinopathy and age-related GA Geographic Atrophy macular degeneration (AMD). We have focused on sum- IOP Intraocular pressure marizing the models critical to new drug development IRMAs Intra-retinal microvascular abnormalities and described the translational features of the models IVT Intravitreal that contributed to our understanding of disease patho- KCS Keratoconjunctivitis sicca genesis and establishment of preclinical POC. MGD Meibomian gland dysfunction nAMD Neovascular age-related macular degeneration NDA New drug application KEY WORDS Age-related macular degeneration . diabetic NHP Non-human primates retinopathy . dry eye disease . glaucoma . ocular allergy NPDR Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy OCT Optical coherence tomography OIR Oxygen-induced retinopathy ONL Outer nuclear layer PACG Primary angle-closure Guest Editors: Hovhannes J Gukasyan, Shumet Hailu, and Thomas Karami PDGF Platelet derived growth factor PDR Proliferative diabetic retinopathy * Veena Viswanath [email protected] POAG Primary open angle POC Proof of concept 1 Biological Research, Allergan plc, 2525 Dupont Drive RGCs Retinal ganglion cells Irvine, California 92612, USA RPE Retinal pigment epithelium 58 Page 2 of 34 Pharm Res (2019) 36: 58 SD Sprague Dawley Ocular Surface Diseases STZ Streptozotocin VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor The ocular surface is a complex tissue system harmonized to VE-PTP Vascular endothelial-protein tyrosine phosphatase achieve a stable tear film and contribute to visual acuity. The lacrimal and meibomian glands, mucin producing goblet cells, and nervous systems are key components of a lacrimal func- INTRODUCTION tional unit which contribute to maintaining a stable tear film (1). Furthermore, epithelial cells and underlying lymphoid as- The pathologies of the eye are usually divided into different sociated tissues provide a mucosal barrier to prevent irritants categories based on the affected region: ocular surface, ante- and pathogens from entering the body. The ocular surface is rior and posterior diseases. Multiple diseases such as cataract, vulnerable to environmental insults and when components of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, presby- this tissue are compromised mild to severe disease can ensue. opia, dry eye disease (DED), ocular allergy and others can lead The most prevalent ocular surface disorders encompass dry to visual impairments and blindness. Ocular pathologies are eye disease (DED), blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction also observed as a common finding in multiple systemic dis- (MGD), and ocular allergy. Patients may experience ocular eases including autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthri- dryness, itch, photosensitivity and foreign body sensations, tis, Sjogren’s Syndrome (SS), rosacea, Graves Diseases, graft which in many cases are shared symptoms of several ocular versus host disease and chronic diseases such as diabetes and surface disorders (2). Disease progression necessitates pharma- hypertension. Development of therapeutic strategies for ocu- ceutical intervention such as anti-inflammatory drugs for lar diseases requires a thorough understanding of etiology, DED and ocular allergy, and antibiotics for blepharitis. molecular and anatomical pathogenic mechanisms and natu- While many patients respond to pharmaceutical treatments, ral history of the disease. Mimicking human diseases in animal there remains a large population that is non-responsive or models in species such as mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, cannot tolerate the side effects associated with these therapies. and primates has been critical to our understanding of several To enable effective therapies a variety of in vivo models that human ocular diseases and for the development of novel mimic multi-tissue heterogeneous pathologies have been de- drugs, drug delivery strategies and advancement of oph- veloped. Highlighted in this portion of the review are animal thalmological diagnostic technologies. This review pro- models of ocular allergy, dry eye syndrome (aqueous deficient vides a focused summary of models key to the develop- and evaporative), and ocular pain that have been utilized in ment of novel therapies for the most common ocular drug development. We will not address preclinical models of diseases (ocular allergy, DED, glaucoma, presbyopia, di- ocular infections or wound healing in the eye as they have abetic retinopathy (DR), and AMD). The application of been reviewed elsewhere (3,4). these models in ocular pharmacology and translational potential to human disease are also discussed. Our in- Ocular Inflammation: Ocular Allergy and Dry Eye Disease tention is not to provide a complete listing of all pre- clinical models for these ophthalmic diseases. Instead, Inflammation plays a key role in the pathology of multiple we focus on the key in vivo models that were used to diseases of the ocular surface including DED, SS and ocular establish preclinical POC prior to entry into the clinic, allergy, thus desirable drug candidates include anti- with emphasis on drugs that have demonstrated clinical inflammatory or immune modulatory molecules. A variety efficacy. Collation of drugs and their preclinical POC of preclinical ocular models have been used to validate the models was done by reviewing information provided in anti-inflammatory property of drugs, as one model may not regulatory documents (eg. New Drug Applications, represent all aspects of the pathology. Discussed below are the NDA), conference abstracts, patent publications, compa- preclinical models used in drug development for ocular allergy ny press releases, Clarivate Analytics’ Integrity and DED. Multiple models of SS have been reported in the Experimental Models Knowledge Area and published literature which have been previously reviewed and will not be literature. Although many of these animal models mimic addressed in the present review (5,6). aspects of ocular diseases, none of them capture the full complexity of human disease. Therefore, multiple Ocular Allergy. Ocular allergy (allergic conjunctivitis) is a hy- models of the same disease are typically needed to re- persensitivity disorder that affects the conjunctiva, lids and/or capitulate different aspects of human pathology. Finally, cornea, with prevalence as high as 20% in the U.S. (7). Several we outline several gaps in current preclinical models subtypes have been described including: Seasonal, the prom- and endpoints that should be considered in the future inent subtype that results in mild disease, perennial allergic development of novel therapeutics to address unmet pa- conjunctivitis, and the less common severe vernal and atopic tient needs. keratoconjunctivitis disorders (VKC and AKC). Robust Pharm Res (2019) 36: 58 Page 3 of 34 58 clinical signs and symptoms such as tearing, chemosis, mucous In contrast to models that mainly capture mast cell discharge and itch are shared among the subtypes, while se- degranulatory responses, antigen-challenge models provide a vere allergy may involve keratitis and corneal ulcer (8). Ocular better opportunity to evaluate factors associated with chronic allergic reactions are initiated with IgE-mediated responses disease. Induction of antigen-challenge begins with a sensiti- that result in mast cell degranulation of factors that drive the zation period initiated with peripheral immunization, typical- hallmark signs and symptoms. This early-phase response ly with a protein, ovalbumin, or an environmental antigen, peaks within 1 h, and can lead to a late-phase response involv- ragweed. This is followed by topical antigen challenge that ing the influx of eosinophils and neutrophils 4–6hlater(9). induces chemosis, tearing, mucus
Recommended publications
  • LGM-Pharma-Regulatory-1527671011
    Pipeline Products List Specialty Portfolio Updated Q2 2018 Updated Q2 2018 See below list of newly approved API’s, samples are readily available for your R&D requirements: Inhalation Ophthalmic Transdermal Sublingual Abaloparatide Defibrotide Sodium Liraglutide Rituximab Abciximab Deforolimus Lixisenatide Rivastigmine Aclidinium Bromide Azelastine HCl Agomelatine Alprazolam Abemaciclib Delafloxacin Lumacaftor Rivastigmine Hydrogen Tartrate Beclomethasone Dipropionate Azithromycin Amlodipine Aripiprazole Acalabrutinib Denosumab Matuzumab Rizatriptan Benzoate Budesonide Besifloxacin HCl Apomorphine Eletriptan HBr Aclidinium Bromide Desmopressin Acetate Meloxicam Rocuronium Bromide Adalimumab Difluprednate Memantine Hydrochloride Rolapitant Flunisolide Bimatoprost Clonidine Epinephrine Aflibercept Dinoprost Tromethamine Micafungin Romidepsin Fluticasone Furoate Brimonidine Tartrate Dextromethorphan Ergotamine Tartrate Agomelatine Dolasetron Mesylate Mitomycin C Romosozumab Fluticasone Propionate Bromfenac Sodium Diclofenac Levocetrizine DiHCl Albiglutide Donepezil Hydrochloride Mometasone Furoate Rotigotine Formoterol Fumarate Cyclosporine Donepezil Meclizine Alectinib Dorzolamide Hydrochloride Montelukast Sodium Rucaparib Iloprost Dexamethasone Valerate Estradiol Melatonin Alemtuzumab Doxercalciferol Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride Sacubitril Alirocumab Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Mycophenolate Mofetil Salmeterol Xinafoate Indacaterol Maleate Difluprednate Fingolimod Meloxicam Amphotericin B Dulaglutide Naldemedine Secukinumab Levalbuterol Dorzolamide
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Cataract Cystoid Macular Oedema Prevention – Update 2019
    Review Cystoid Macular Oedema Post-cataract Cystoid Macular Oedema Prevention – Update 2019 Andrzej Grzybowski,1,2 Reda Zemaitiene,3 Lina Mikalauskiene3 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland; 2. Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland; 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2019.13.1.37 seudophakic cystoid macular oedema (PCMO) is a common complication following both uncomplicated and complicated cataract surgery, becoming apparent about 6 weeks following surgery. PCMO may be asymptomatic in some cases, but in others is associated Pwith a reduction in visual acuity. The pathogenesis of PCMO is linked to postoperative inflammation and the release of inflammatory mediators. The use of topical steroids and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can reduce the adverse effects of inflammation and have been used for the prevention and treatment of PCMO. However, the therapeutic effectiveness of these drugs is currently not well understood, partially because PCMO can spontaneously resolve as well as the multiple treatment protocols and the paucity of robust data exist. In this review we compare the various prophylactic options for PCMO and provide commentary on their efficacy. Keywords Various options for the prevention of pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema (PCMO) have been Pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema, offered. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) seem to be beneficial in preventing post-operative inflammation, cataract surgery, postoperative inflammation; however, there is lack of evidence for long-term benefit after cataract nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs surgery. What is more, topical NSAID preparations are difficult to compare, as studies differ in Disclosure: Andrzej Grzybowski, Reda inclusion criteria, patient characteristics, prescription and duration of treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Analysts, Join Us! @Scripnews /Scripintelligence Contents/Editor’S Letter
    November 20th 2015 No 3778 scripintelligence.com Brandicourt’s ‘Big Reveal’ Falls Flat For Sanofi Seven months into the job and the shine is wearing off Sanofi’s new CEO Olivier Brandicourt. His first “Meet the Management” investor day on Nov. 6 left analysts underwhelmed and shares slipping. Previous CEO Christopher Viehbacher’s ignominious departure last year was blamed on the poor performance of its US diabetes franchise, weak oversight of local management and poor communication with Sanofi’s board of directors. Brandicourt may feel he has made strides to tackle management Bplanet/shutterstock.com and communication issues, but the diabetes franchise continues to be problematic. “Sanofi provided a 2020 growth outlook with a disappointing near-term earnings MISSING THE TARGET: Sanofi CEO lays out plans as further diabetes trajectory – flat EPS growth to 2017 versus franchise decline looms consensus expectations of 3-5% growth,” noted Goldman Sachs. Building on a reorganization of Sanofi that Brandicourt outlined four strategic priorities 2. To deliver “outstanding” launches with a he announced in July, Brandicourt delivered for Sanofi: particular focus on six major products: a set of ambitious priorities for the French 1. To reshape its portfolio around the Toujeo (insulin glargine injection), Praluent pharma major. “The company will remain core businesses where it can sustain a (alirocumab), Dengvaxia (dengue fever diversified but with a portfolio focused on leadership position or build a competitive vaccine), sarilumab, LixiLan (lixisenatide
    [Show full text]
  • DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION in the MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1
    Effective Date: 08/01/2021 DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IN THE MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1 Therapeutic Category Drug Class Trade Name Generic Name HCPCS Procedure Code HCPCS Procedure Code Description Anti-infectives Antiretrovirals, HIV CABENUVA cabotegravir-rilpivirine C9077 Injection, cabotegravir and rilpivirine, 2mg/3mg Antithrombotic Agents von Willebrand Factor-Directed Antibody CABLIVI caplacizumab-yhdp C9047 Injection, caplacizumab-yhdp, 1 mg Cardiology Antilipemic EVKEEZA evinacumab-dgnb C9079 Injection, evinacumab-dgnb, 5 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent BERINERT c1 esterase J0597 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Berinert, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent CINRYZE c1 esterase J0598 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Cinryze, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent FIRAZYR icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent HAEGARDA c1 esterase J0599 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), (Haegarda), 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent ICATIBANT (generic) icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent KALBITOR ecallantide J1290 Injection, ecallantide, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent RUCONEST c1 esterase J0596 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (recombinant), Ruconest, 10 units Injection, lanadelumab-flyo, 1 mg (code may be used for Medicare when drug administered under Cardiology Hemostatic Agent TAKHZYRO lanadelumab-flyo J0593 direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self-administered) Cardiology Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension EPOPROSTENOL (generic)
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Drug List
    Commonly Prescribed Maintenance Medications Maintenance (or long-term) medications are those dosage form may be used to treat more than one drugs you may take on a regular basis to treat conditions medical condition. In these cases, each medication may such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure or diabetes. be classified according to its first U.S. Food and Drug Based on your benefit plan, you may get up to a 90-day Administration (FDA) approved use. Some strengths supply of covered maintenance medication delivered and/or formulations listed may not be covered. to you through a home delivery program or at select Please note that oral contraceptives are maintenance retail pharmacies. medications and are part of this list. However, this Some plans may require you to fill these prescriptions list does not include the trade names of all available through home delivery or at select retail pharmacies oral contraceptives because there are a large number in order to receive coverage. of products. Commonly used maintenance medications are listed in Coverage is always subject to the terms and limits of this guide. This list is not all-inclusive and may change your benefit plan. Please verify with your plan if there from time to time. are any additional requirements before a drug may be Most generic drugs listed are followed by a reference covered. For details about your plan, check your benefit brand drug in (parentheses). The brand name drug materials or call the number on your member ID card. in parentheses is listed for reference and may not be Third-party brand names are the property of their covered under your benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Usefulness of Systemic Inflammatory Markers As Diagnostic
    A RQUIVOS B RASILEIROS DE ORIGINAL ARTICLE The usefulness of systemic inflammatory markers as diagnostic indicators of the pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema A utilidade de marcadores inflamatórios sistêmicos como indicadores diagnósticos da patogênese do edema macular diabético Cagri Ilhan1 , Mehmet Citirik2, Mehmet Murat Uzel3, Hasan Kiziltoprak4, Kemal Tekin5 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hatay State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Bingol Maternity and Child Hospital, Bingol, Turkey. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Ercis State Hospital, Van, Turkey. ABSTRACT | Purpose: To investigate the usefulness of sys- groups were similar (diabetic macular edema vs. non-diabetic temic inflammatory markers [i.e., white blood cell and platelet macular edema, p=0.08; diabetic macular edema vs. control, counts, mean platelet volume, and their ratios] as diagnostic p=0.02; and non- diabetic macular edema vs. control, p=0.78). markers of the pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema. Me- All other parameters were similar between groups (all p>0.05). thods: The study cohort included 80 diabetic macular edema Conclusion: The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet patients (40 with diabetic retinopathy and 40 without) and 40 volume of the diabetic macular edema group were higher than healthy age- and sex-matched controls. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, those of the non-diabetic macular edema and control groups. monocyte, and platelet counts, and the mean platelet volume A neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio cutoff value of ≥2.26 was identified were determined from peripheral blood samples, and the as an indicator of the pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema monocyte/lymphocyte, platelet/lymphocyte, and mean platelet with high sensitivity and specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifitegrast for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease in Adults
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy ISSN: 1465-6566 (Print) 1744-7666 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ieop20 Lifitegrast for the treatment of dry eye disease in adults Eric D. Donnenfeld, Henry D. Perry, Alanna S. Nattis & Eric D. Rosenberg To cite this article: Eric D. Donnenfeld, Henry D. Perry, Alanna S. Nattis & Eric D. Rosenberg (2017): Lifitegrast for the treatment of dry eye disease in adults, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1372748 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2017.1372748 Accepted author version posted online: 25 Aug 2017. Published online: 04 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 11 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ieop20 Download by: [108.6.184.233] Date: 04 September 2017, At: 04:29 EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2017.1372748 DRUG EVALUATION Lifitegrast for the treatment of dry eye disease in adults Eric D. Donnenfelda, Henry D. Perryb, Alanna S. Nattisb and Eric D. Rosenbergc aOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island, New York University Medical Center, Garden City, NY, USA; bOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Nassau University Medical Center, Rockville Centre, NY, USA; cWestchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Introduction: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular disorder that can have a substantial burden on Received 14 June 2017 quality of life and daily activities. Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% is the first medication approved in Accepted 24 August 2017 the US for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of DED.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Eye Disease in the 21St Century the Burden of Dry Eye Disease
    CME MONOGRAPH Two ways to request CME credit: Visit http://tinyurl.com/dryeyedisease or fax the completed form to 215-825-4732. IMproVIng rECognITIon anD ManagEMEnT of DRY EYE DISEASE IN THE 21ST CENTURY THE BURDEN OF DRY EYE DISEASE Original Release: September 1, 2016 Last Review: August 1, 2016 Expiration: September 30, 2017 FACULTY This continuing medical education activity is jointly provided by Stephen C. Pflugfelder, MD Wills Eye Hospital and MedEdicus LLC. Chair/Moderator Esen Akpek, MD Edward J. Holland, MD America’s First World’s Best Jodi Luchs, MD This continuing medical education activity is supported through an unrestricted educational grant from Shire. Victor L. Perez, MD Distributed with Purpose and Target Audience 3. Describe their role. Increasing knowledge about dry eye disease is fueling 4. no relevant financial relationships. advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic Disclosures modalities that may help to overcome existing problems with underrecognition and undertreatment CME Reviewer: Ralph C. Eagle Jr, MD, has no of this common disorder. The purpose of this activity relevant financial relationships with any commercial FACULTY is to update ophthalmologists on developments in interests. the understanding of dry eye immunopathology, Faculty: evaluation, and management to enable optimal Dr Esen Akpek is a consultant for novartis ag and Stephen C. Pflugfelder, MD patient care based on improved diagnosis and Shire; and a contracted researcher for allergan. treatment tailored to the individual’s disease Chair/Moderator characteristics. Dr Edward J. Holland is a consultant for alcon; professor of ophthalmology Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; Kala pharmaceuticals; This activity is intended to educate James and Margaret Elkins Chair Mati Therapeutics, Inc; prn, Inc; rapid pathogen ophthalmologists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Angiopoietin-2 and TIE Pathway As a Therapeutic Target for Enhancing Antiangiogenic Therapy and Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Angiopoietin-2 and TIE Pathway as a Therapeutic Target for Enhancing Antiangiogenic Therapy and Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer Alessandra Leong and Minah Kim * Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; afl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 September 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 18 November 2020 Abstract: Despite significant advances made in cancer treatment, the development of therapeutic resistance to anticancer drugs represents a major clinical problem that limits treatment efficacy for cancer patients. Herein, we focus on the response and resistance to current antiangiogenic drugs and immunotherapies and describe potential strategies for improved treatment outcomes. Antiangiogenic treatments that mainly target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling have shown efficacy in many types of cancer. However, drug resistance, characterized by disease recurrence, has limited therapeutic success and thus increased our urgency to better understand the mechanism of resistance to inhibitors of VEGF signaling. Moreover, cancer immunotherapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which stimulate antitumor immunity, have also demonstrated a remarkable clinical benefit in the treatment of many aggressive malignancies. Nevertheless, the emergence of resistance to immunotherapies associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment has restricted therapeutic response, necessitating the development of better therapeutic strategies to increase treatment efficacy in patients. Angiopoietin-2 (ANG2), which binds to the receptor tyrosine kinase TIE2 in endothelial cells, is a cooperative driver of angiogenesis and vascular destabilization along with VEGF. It has been suggested in multiple preclinical studies that ANG2-mediated vascular changes contribute to the development and persistence of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • HY 2021 Results
    Roche HY 2021 results Basel, 22 July 2021 This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as ‘believes’, ‘expects’, ‘anticipates’, ‘projects’, ‘intends’, ‘should’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘future’ or similar expressions or by discussion of, among other things, strategy, goals, plans or intentions. Various factors may cause actual results to differ materially in the future from those reflected in forward-looking statements contained in this presentation, among others: 1 pricing and product initiatives of competitors; 2 legislative and regulatory developments and economic conditions; 3 delay or inability in obtaining regulatory approvals or bringing products to market; 4 fluctuations in currency exchange rates and general financial market conditions; 5 uncertainties in the discovery, development or marketing of new products or new uses of existing products, including without limitation negative results of clinical trials or research projects, unexpected side-effects of pipeline or marketed products; 6 increased government pricing pressures; 7 interruptions in production; 8 loss of or inability to obtain adequate protection for intellectual property rights; 9 litigation; 10 loss of key executives or other employees; and 11 adverse publicity and news coverage. Any statements regarding earnings per share growth is not a profit forecast and should not be interpreted to mean that Roche’s earnings or earnings per share for this year or any subsequent period will necessarily match or exceed the historical published earnings or earnings per share of Roche. For marketed products discussed in this presentation, please see full prescribing information on our website www.roche.com All mentioned trademarks are legally protected.
    [Show full text]