Tipologia E Classificação De Navios

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tipologia E Classificação De Navios TIPOLOGIA E CLASSIFICAÇÃO DE NAVIOS Poderá parecer despropositado, agora, falar sobre este assunto, já que existe basta literatura sobre o mesmo. Mas é por isso mesmo. Há pouco mais de 40 anos, quando embarquei pela primeira vez, existiam uma meia dúzia de tipos de navios. Agora, ultrapassam a centena. Nessa altura, além do universalmente conhecido por tipo de carga (p. ex. o navio petroleiro e LPG’s, de carga geral, graneleiro, de passageiros), por tipo de pesca praticada (palangreiro, atuneiro, arrastão, etc.) e pelo tipo de trabalho (rebocador portuário e de alto mar, draga, barcaças e pouco mais). Já existiam, no entanto, algumas classificações decorrentes do pós-guerra e do plano Marshall, como os SD14 e os Liberty’s Ships, bem como os navios que faziam, maioritariamente, o mercado europeu, com designações derivadas dos seus limites de tonelagem (aquilo a que estavam sujeitos a pagar de despesas portuárias) como os 499’s e os 999’s. Convém lembrar que os anos 1970’s foram profícuos em querelas regionais, ou não estivéssemos em plena Guerra Fria: choques petrolíferos, 3ª guerra do Suez e etc. Foi nesta altura que surgiram os primeiros Capesize (mais tarde rebaptizados de VLCC’s – Very Large Crude Carriers – e outras designações específicas). Por contraponto à criação da designação Capesize (que acaba por se generalizar a navios de carga seca), surge o conceito Panamax, pois aqueles não podiam passar pelo Canal do Panamá, tendo que circundar o Cabo da Boa Esperança e o Cabo Horn. No final dessa década e na seguinte, assistiu-se à “explosão” da contentorização que, ao longo dos tempos e até hoje, nos brindou com dezenas de designações (algumas redundantes, diga-se). Mas, para que possa dar algum sentido prático a este artigo, devo-o sistematizar de alguma forma. Convém dizer que, essencialmente, poderemos dividir as classificações em três grandes grupos: as técnicas, as operacionais e as de índole, estritamente, comercial (ou de marketing, se preferirem). As primeiras têm, essencialmente, a ver com os tráfegos e tipos de carga transportados. As operacionais referem-se à volumetria dos navios e aos constrangimentos e afunilamentos (gargalos) que lhes são colocados no decurso dos seus tráfegos. Finalmente, as comerciais reflectem designações que pretendem definir as políticas de investimento e de operação das empresas em determinados mercados ou tráfegos. Convém chamar a atenção que os maiores portos (não, necessariamente, em tamanho ou volume de carga) também entraram na corrida, tornando-se quase moda. Refiro-me, por exemplo, a António Costa – nov2013 1 designações como HamburgMax, BremenMax ou DunkirkMax, que definem o tamanho máximo definido pelas limitações físicas desses portos. Como já disse, procurarei, agora, sistematizar. Exactamente, pela ordem que atrás referi, começando pelas técnicas e, dentro delas, subdividir pelos outros grupos, de acordo com o seguinte esquema: Volumetria/Porte Tipo de Carga Sub-tipo de carga Constrangimentos Comerciais 1. Carga líquida ou liquefeita Os navios-tanque são especialmente projectados para o transporte de líquidos (principalmente, os derivados de petróleo, embora possam transportar outros tipos de carga, como vinho, óleos alimentares, água e melaços). A sua construção é totalmente diferente da dos navios de carga sólida (construídos num sistema celular, através da qual o navio está dividido, longitudinalmente e transversalmente, em compartimentos). Os navios-tanque estão equipados com tubos, válvulas e bombas para transferir a carga de e, ou, para terra (ou outros navios). 1.a. Petroleiros Existem diferentes tamanhos de navios-tanque utilizados para o transporte internacional de petróleo, desde o modesto costeiro até o supertanque ULCC. A regra comum é que o volume que pode ser transportado num petroleiro aumenta em função do cubo do seu comprimento. Por exemplo, um ULCC tem cerca de duas vezes o comprimento de um petroleiro costeiro (415 metros contra 205 metros), mas pode transportar cerca de 8 vezes a quantidade do costeiro (400.000 toneladas de porte bruto contra 50.000). Desde 2010, apenas 12 navios acima dos 320.000 dwt permaneceram. Desse total, apenas dois “verdadeiros” ULCC´s, de cerca de 430.000 dwt continuam em operação, o Ti Europa e o Ti Oceana, que faziam parte de um grupo de quatro navios construídos entre 2002 e 2003. Os outros dois, Ti África e Ti Ásia foram convertidos em FSMU (unidades de armazenamento flutuante e de amarração) em 2010. Entre as principais classes de petroleiros encontramos: António Costa – nov2013 2 Classes – Designação Descrição Volume Utilização Comercial Bumboat Navio abastecedor. Costeiros Produtos Menos de 50 mil toneladas de porte bruto, usados, principalmente, no transporte de produtos refinados Pretos (gasolina, gasóleo, etc.). Produtos P-Max São navios de produtos de cerca de 49.900 toneladas de porte bruto. O conceito MAX significa que estão projectados para uma capacidade máxima de carga em águas rasas. Além do casco duplo obrigatório, foram concebidos de acordo com um novo conceito para o transporte mais seguro de óleo, com dois motores propulsores em salas de máquinas completamente separadas, lemes duplos, dois hélices e sistemas de controlo em duplicado. Químicos O Chemical Carrier Code da IMO divide os produtos químicos em três categorias, estipulando critérios de arranjo e protecção dos tanques para os diversos tipos de navios: Tipo I, II e III. Os seus tanques são revestidos, ou totalmente construídos, em aço inoxidável. C-Max Porte bruto de 10.000 toneladas ao serviço entre portos do Mar das Caraíbas. Handymax Pretos Até 65 mil toneladas de porte bruto, usados, Crude principalmente, no transporte de crude e produtos refinados pretos (ou pesados). Panamax Crude Até 85 mil toneladas de porte bruto, usados, principalmente, no transporte de crude. Crude Aframax Cerca de 80 mil toneladas de porte bruto (AFRA – Average Freight Rate Assessment – sistema de composição de frete através da média ponderada dos navios-tanque de propriedade independente). Transporte de crude. Suezmax Crude Entre 125.000 e 180.000 dwt, originalmente, a capacidade máxima do canal de Suez. Capesize Crude Navios acima de 180.000 de porte bruto, que não podem passar pelo Suez. Nesta classe podemos incluir todos os VLCC’s e ULCC’s. VLCC FPSO Very Large Crude Carrier. Até cerca de 320 mil dwt. FSMU Alguns podem ser acomodados pelas actuais Crude dimensões do Canal de Suez. O comprimento mais comum varia entre de 300 e os 330 metros, sendo usados no transporte de crude. Alguns deles foram, entretanto, transformados para actividades fixas em offshore. V-MAX Crude Os V-Max transportam carga de volume idêntico ao VLCC, embora com um calado de Suezmax. Obedecem ao conceito MAX através da duplicação dos sistemas de propulsão e governo. V-Plus FSMU Ti ou T1 Na verdade são ULCC’s, distinguindo-se deles apenas Crude pelo facto de possuírem casco duplo. Usados no transporte de crude. António Costa – nov2013 3 ULCC Crude Ultra Large Crude Carrier. Capacidade superior a 320 FSMU mil dwt. Usados no transporte de crude. Alguns deles FPSO foram, entretanto, transformados para actividades fixas em offshore. Shuttle Um navio aliviador está projectado para o transporte de petróleo a partir de um campo de petróleo offshore, estando equipado com equipamentos de carga/descarga compatíveis com o campo petrolífero em questão. Nota: existem mais algumas mas que reportam a classes de navios por bandas de tonelagem de porte, dentro das políticas comerciais das empresas armadoras. Ex: as classes A, D e O da Shell, para os navios petroleiros de 10.000, 110.000 e 330.00 dwt, respectivamente. 1.b. Gases Liquefeitos Nesta classe de substâncias, reguladas pelo Gas Carrier Code da IMO, estão incluídos gases de petróleo liquefeitos ou GPL (LPG em inglês), gás natural liquefeito ou GNL (LNG em inglês) e vários outros gases químicos como amónia, propileno e etileno. Os navios desenhados para transporte de GPL são adequados ao transporte da maioria dos gases químicos. 1.b.1 LPG’s Classes – Designação Descrição Volume Técnica Costeiros n/Refrigerados Navios de gás de pequeno porte, com capacidades Semirefrigerados geralmente inferiores a 6,000 m3, envolvidos no tráfego Refrigerados costeiro ou noutros de pequeno curso. Oceânicos Refrigerados Navios de porte médio, com capacidades entre os 20 e os 60 mil metros cúbicos, completamente refrigerados, que transportam LPG e também amónia anidra. VLGC Refrigerados Very Large Gas Carriers. Navios com capacidades na ordem dos 75.000 a 100.000 m3, completamente refrigerados. António Costa – nov2013 4 1.b.2. LNG´s Classes – Designação Descrição Volume Técnica Comercial SGC Small Gas Carriers de 2.000 m3 a 20.000 m3 MGC Medium Gas Carriers de 20.000 m3 a 40.000 m3 LGC Large Gas Carriers de 50.000 m3 a 70.000m3 VLGC Very Large Gas Carriers de 70.000 m3 a 135.000 m3 ULGC Ultra Large Gas Carrier mais de 135.000 m3 Q-Flex Navios de dois motores diesel de baixa velocidade, ditos Q-Max mais eficientes e ambientalmente amigáveis. Estão equipados com um sistema de reliquefação para reduzir perdas de GNL. No nome Q-Max, "Q" significa Qatar e "Max" o tamanho máximo de navio admissível nos terminais de GNL no Qatar. Capacidades: Q-Flex 215.000 m3 e Q-Max 266.000 m3. Tipo A Moss Sistemas de construção e contenção dos tanques de Tipo B SPB carga, pressurização e refrigeração. Tipo C ConocoPh illips Membrana Technigaz Mark III 2. Carga sólida ou seca 2.a Graneleiros Os navios graneleiros podem ser classificados segundo o porte, havendo que distinguir alguns subtipos, especialmente desenhados para tráfegos e cargas António Costa – nov2013 5 específicas, sendo as suas proporções e respectivo arranjo interno fortemente influenciados pela densidade da carga para a qual foram construídos. Classes – Designação Descrição Volume Técnica BC Bulk Carriers O Ore Carriers OO Ore & Oil Carriers OBO Ore, Bulk & Oil Carriers CONBULK Containers & Bulk CIM Cement carrier.
Recommended publications
  • New South Exit Channel in Río De La Plata: a Preliminary Design Study
    New south exit channel in Río de la Plata: A preliminary design study Jelmer Brandt, Koen Minnee, Roel Winter, Stefan Gerrits & Victor Kramer TU Delft & University of Buenos Aires 17-11-2015 PREFACE During the Master of Civil Engineering at the TU Delft students can participate in a Multidisciplinary Project as part of their study curriculum. Student with different study backgrounds work together, simulating a small engineering consulting firm. Different aspects of a problem are regarded and a solution needs to be presented in a time-scope of 8 weeks. This project is often executed abroad. We took the opportunity to take this course and found a project in Buenos Aires, Argentina. During these two months we were able to apply our gained theoretical knowledge in a real time project setting. We experienced working and living in a in country with a significant culture difference. Argentina differs with the Netherlands in quite some areas, for example: Language, politics, economy and lifestyle. We had a great time being here working on the project as well as living in Buenos Aires. We would like to thank Ir. H.J. Verhagen (TU Delft) for getting us in touch with the University of Buenos Aires and for his project and content advise. Our supervisors, Eng. R. Escalante (Hídrovia S.A./UBA) in Buenos Aires, Ir. H. Verheij (TU Delft) and Prof. Ir. T. Vellinga (TU Delft) in The Netherlands, have been of great support providing the project group with advice and insights. We also had dinner with Dutch people in the Argentine water sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch's Elements of Shipping/Alan E
    ‘I would strongly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in shipping or taking a course where shipping is an important element, for example, chartering and broking, maritime transport, exporting and importing, ship management, and international trade. Using an approach of simple analysis and pragmatism, the book provides clear explanations of the basic elements of ship operations and commercial, legal, economic, technical, managerial, logistical, and financial aspects of shipping.’ Dr Jiangang Fei, National Centre for Ports & Shipping, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia ‘Branch’s Elements of Shipping provides the reader with the best all-round examination of the many elements of the international shipping industry. This edition serves as a fitting tribute to Alan Branch and is an essential text for anyone with an interest in global shipping.’ David Adkins, Lecturer in International Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University ‘Combining the traditional with the modern is as much a challenge as illuminating operations without getting lost in the fascination of the technical detail. This is particularly true for the world of shipping! Branch’s Elements of Shipping is an ongoing example for mastering these challenges. With its clear maritime focus it provides a very comprehensive knowledge base for relevant terms and details and it is a useful source of expertise for students and practitioners in the field.’ Günter Prockl, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark This page intentionally left blank Branch’s Elements of Shipping Since it was first published in 1964, Elements of Shipping has become established as a market leader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Economies of Scale for Reductions in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Shipping
    Energy Policy 46 (2012) 386–398 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping Haakon Lindstad a,b,n, Bjørn E. Asbjørnslett a, Anders H. Strømman a a Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway b Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute (MARINTEK), NO-7450 Trondheim, Norway article info abstract Article history: CO2 emissions from maritime transport represent 3.3% of the world’s total CO2 emissions and are Received 15 August 2011 forecast to increase by 150%–250% by 2050, due to increased freight volumes (Second IMO GHG study, Accepted 29 March 2012 2009). Fulfilling anticipated climate requirements (IPCC, 2007) could require the sector to reduce Available online 19 April 2012 emissions per freight unit by a factor of five or six. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is Keywords: currently debating technical, operational and market-based measures for reducing greenhouse gas Maritime transport emissions from shipping. This paper also investigates the effects of economies of scale on the direct Economies of scale emissions and costs of maritime transport. We compared emissions from the current fleet (2007), with Greenhouse gas emissions what can be achieved by increasing average vessel size. The comparison is based on the 2007 levels of trade and predictions for 2050. The results show that emissions can be reduced by up to 30% at a negative abatement cost per ton of CO2 by replacing the existing fleet with larger vessels. Replacing the whole fleet might take as long as 25 years, so the reduction in emissions will be achieved gradually as the current fleet is renewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2011
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2011 Report by the UNCTAD secretariat Chapter 2 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2011 2 STRUCTURE, OWNERSHIP AND REGISTRATION OF THE WORLD FLEET CHAPTER 2 The year 2010 saw record deliveries of new tonnage, 28 per cent higher than in 2009, resulting in an 8.6 per cent growth in the world eet. The world merchant eet reached almost 1.4 billion deadweight tons in January 2011, an increase of 120 million dwt over 2010. New deliveries stood at 150 million dwt, against demolitions and other withdrawals from the market of approximately 30 million dwt. Since 2005, the dry bulk eet has almost doubled, and the containership eet has nearly tripled. The share of foreign- agged tonnage reached an estimated 68 per cent in January 2011. This chapter presents the supply-side dynamics of the world maritime industry. It covers the structure, age prole, ownership and registration of the world eet. The chapter also reviews deliveries, demolitions, and tonnage on order. 36 Review of MaRitiMe tRanspoRt 2011 A. structure of the world fleet The share of dry bulk tonnage has gone up from 27 per cent to 38 per cent since 1980, while the share of 1. world fleet growth and principal oil tankers has decreased from almost 50 per cent to vessel types 34 per cent. The world fleet in 2011 Long-term trends in vessel types In January 2011, there were 103,392 seagoing The composition of the world fleet reflects the demands commercial ships in service, with a combined tonnage for seaborne trade of different commodities, including of 1,396 million dwt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Types & Sizes
    The Source for Maritime Information and Insight Chris Pålsson, Director, IHS Fairplay Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Size matters Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Endorsed by the IMSF 2011 Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4 Basis for size categories • Dimensional limitations – Passages, straits, canals, bridges, locks….. • Operational – Rate setting mechanisms – Cargo batch sizes – Type of service – Range of service – ….. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Lingo • Handysize, small/large • VLCC • Handymax, large • ULCC • Supramax • VLGC • Panamax, sub/post/new • Feeder • Kamsarmax • ULCS • Capesize, mini • Seawaymax • VLOC • Chinamax • MR, small/large • Q-max • Aframax • Säfflemax • Suezmax • …. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 Dimensional limitations Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Panama Canal Panamax – L 294.1 m – B 32.3 m – D 12.04 m – H 61.3 New Panamax – L 366 m – B 49 m – D 15.2 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. – H 61.3 8 Suez Canal Suez Canal Bridge Shohada 25 January Bridge Egyptian-Japanese Friendship Bridge Max draft: 20.1 m, Max height: 68 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 The Strait of Malacca Depth 25 m. Max draft 21 m. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 St Lawrence Seaway • L 225.6 m (740 feet) • B 23.8 m (78 feet) • D 7.9 m (26 feet) • H 35.5 m (116 feet) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Qatar: Q-max • L 345 m (1,132 ft) • B 53.8 m (177 ft) • H 34.7 m (114 ft) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 2, October 2016
    NO. 2, OCTOBER 2016 Welcome to the second issue of the Maritime Information System (MIS) newsletter. Comments following the first issue, which was released in June, were very positive and clearly showed that the MIS meets an important need. We hope that this issue will be just as well received as it focuses on analyzing change in the size of ves- sels navigating the St. Lawrence. Beginning with the next issue, you will notice changes in the newsletter’s content. At the request of the partners associated with the project, we will endeavour to have each issue present ongoing updates on cer- tain subjects of interest to the industry. These will be supplemented by further analyses on various topics. You are invited to share your suggestions so that the newsletter reflects your needs and expectations. We are happy to point out that, in addition to preparing these newsletters, we are working to make headway on two fronts: developing the web interface for future online consultation of marine sector-related data and, with the collaboration of the Canadian port authorities located in Québec, pooling data related to goods traf- fic. Once completed, this work will promote even greater data dissemination and marine sector development. Happy reading! Nicole Trépanier, President and CEO SODES Sylvain Lafrance, Executive Director Innovation maritime IN THIS ISSUE The St. Lawrence’s Big Ships Change in Canadian Vessel Size 1 THE ST. LAWRENCE’S BIG SHIPS Over the period 2006-2015, St. Lawrence ports regularly welcomed ships more than 300 m long. As shown in the table below, with the exception of bulkers, the maximum length of ships navigating the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2013
    OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2013 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2013 New York and Geneva, 2013 ii REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2013 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove necessary, based on comments made by Governments, will be reflected in a corrigendum to be issued subsequently. * * * Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Use of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, with reference to the document symbol (UNCTAD/RMT/2013). A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat at the following address: Palais des Nations, CH 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNCTAD/RMT/2013 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales no. E. 13.II.D.9 ISBN 978-92-1-112872-7 e-ISBN 978-92-1-054195-4 ISSN 0566-7682 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Review of Maritime Transport 2013 was prepared by the Trade Logistics Branch of the Division on Technology and Logistics, UNCTAD, under the coordination of Jan Hoffmann with administrative support and formatting by Florence Hudry and Wendy Juan, the supervision of José María Rubiato, and the overall guidance of Anne Miroux.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads TRANSFORMATIONS on the ROAD to 2040
    Crossroads TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE ROAD TO 2040 MICHAEL LOESCHER AND MIKA AALTONEN Crossroads Transformations on the Road to 2040 MICHAEL LOESCHER AND MIKA AALTONEN Cover Photo: Tankers Offshore Ghana © 2012/ag Loescher Aalto University publication series CROSSOVER 3/2015 © Michael Loescher and Mika Aaltonen Graphic Design Unigrafia Oy ISBN 978–952–60–6156–6 (printed) ISBN 978–952–60–6157–3 (pdf) ISSN-L 1799–4977 ISSN 1799–4977 (printed) ISSN 1799–4985 (pdf) Unigrafia Oy Helsinki, 2015 CONTENTS Foreword – Our Philosophy .............................................................................. 7 Chapter 1 – New Worlds ................................................................................. 9 Dawn ................................................................................................ 11 Elemental Change ............................................................................. 15 Virtuality and Venues ........................................................................ 16 The Planetary Crisis .......................................................................... 16 Population Growth .............................................................................18 Urbanization ......................................................................................20 Developments in Trade ..................................................................... 22 Chapter 2 – World Transport ......................................................................... 25 Air Transport ......................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping: a Safe and Friendly Business -Facts and Figures
    MARITIME KNOWLEDGE CENTRE “sharing maritime knowledge” International Shipping Facts and Figures – Information Resources on Trade, Safety, Security, Environment © Maritime Knowledge Centre 6 March 2012 This document is a compilation of internal and external statistics: please check source and disclaimer on page 1 Note and disclaimer The aim of this document is to provide researchers with a broad overview. It is not exhaustive nor does it purport to depict a complete picture of the various ramifications of the shipping industry. It is not an official IMO publication. The information relating to IMO originates from data contained in various IMO documents and the website. IMO Documents cited are available online. IMO and the MKC accept no responsibility for accuracy and comparability of external data. The original sources of statistical information should always be cited and not attributed to IMO unless IMO is specifically listed as being the originator. Readers are advised to refer to the various sources cited for the latest information and a definition of terms used. Please note that use of names of States, territories, land areas, bodies of water and adjectives of nationality may not be in concordance with United Nations and IMO guidelines and IMO bears no responsibility for them. This document is downloadable from the IMO website in the Knowledge Centre section: Ships and Shipping- Facts and Figures 5 March 2012 This document is a compilation of internal and external statistics: please check source and disclaimer on page 1 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 6 2. GLOBALIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE ...................................... 6 2.1. SHIPPING AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S
    PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION: IMPACT ON U.S. AGRICULTURE Prepared for: UNITED SOYBEAN BOARD U.S. SOYBEAN EXPORT COUNCIL SOY TRANSPORTATION COALITION Prepared by: December 2011 775 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Suite 400 ~ Memphis, Tennessee 38120-9403 Telephone 901.202.4600 ~ Fax 901.766.4402 http://www.informaecon.com Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S. Agriculture December 2011 This copyrighted material is intended for the use of clients of Informa Economics, Inc., only and may not be reproduced or electronically transmitted to other companies or individuals, whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Informa Economics, Inc. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable and the views expressed within this document reflect judgments at this time and are subject to change without notice. Informa Economics, Inc. does not guarantee that the information contained herein is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. © informa economics, inc. ii Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S. Agriculture December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. XI A. WORLD CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING PROJECT ...................................................................................... XI B. CONTAINER OCEAN CARRIER MARKET/VESSEL GROWTH IS DRIVING DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... XII C. DEFINED SURPLUS AND DEFICIT AREAS, NATIONALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Code 2020 & an Introductory Guide to Modern Shipping
    GGuide to Baltic Code 2020 & An Introductory Guide to Modern Shipping Introduction This document is primarily designed to be a Guide to the New Baltic Code and provides a framework for how the New Baltic Code is applicable to, and can be utilised by, the maritime markets. It includes the introductory guide to modern shipping and terminology which many new Baltic Exchange Members have found useful. Capitalised terms used herein and otherwise not defined have the meaning given to them in the New Baltic Code. The Role and Organisation of the Baltic Exchange The Baltic is the world's oldest shipping market. It traces its name to the Virginia and Baltick Coffee House, established in 1744. At this time, it was used mainly by merchants who had a maJor trade in tallow from the Baltic seaboard. The Baltic Exchange was reorganised into its modern corporate form at the time of the construction of the original Baltic Exchange building in St Mary Axe which opened in 1903. After this building was destroyed by an IRA bomb in 1992, the Baltic Exchange moved into its current headQuarters at 38 St Mary Axe. The Baltic developed into the world’s most prestigious and only international, self-regulated market for matching ships and cargoes and buying and selling ships. Although in the light of modern business practice and international communications, a trading floor is no longer necessary, the Baltic's global Members continue to operate as a shipping marketplace and to apply the highest standards of ethics. A large part of the world's ship chartering and Sale & Purchase business is negotiated at some stage by Members of the Baltic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems Panama Canal Expans
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY CHAIN AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION IMPACTS ON U.S. EAST COAST PORTS CARA MARIE MEINZER ULIZIO SUMMER 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Supply Chain and Information Systems with honors in Supply Chain and Information Systems Reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert Novack Associate Professor of Supply Chain Management Thesis Supervisor John Spychalski Emeritus Professor of Supply Chain Management Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College i ABSTRACT The Panama Canal serves as the passageway that connects the Atlantic Ocean with the Pacific Ocean which reduces vessel transit time by allowing vessels routed to the U.S. East Coast to avoid sailing around South America. In response to larger vessel sizes and the global shipping industry, the Panama Canal began an expansion project in late 2007 that was completed in May of 2016. The changes to the Panama Canal are impacting the global shipping industry, shipping traffic and individual ports. In anticipation of heightened shipping traffic, U.S. East Coast Ports heavily invested and upgraded their port capabilities. The four ports of Boston, New York-New Jersey, Philadelphia, and Baltimore are examined by analyzing their current capabilities and port improvement initiatives. Recommendations are then made to the individual ports and two strategies are discussed which can be adopted by any of the ports along the East Coast. The study concludes by looking at the relevance of the expansion of the Panama Canal and port improvements in relation to the future of the global shipping industry and increasing vessel sizes.
    [Show full text]