Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION: IMPACT ON U.S. AGRICULTURE Prepared for: UNITED SOYBEAN BOARD U.S. SOYBEAN EXPORT COUNCIL SOY TRANSPORTATION COALITION Prepared by: December 2011 775 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Suite 400 ~ Memphis, Tennessee 38120-9403 Telephone 901.202.4600 ~ Fax 901.766.4402 http://www.informaecon.com Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S. Agriculture December 2011 This copyrighted material is intended for the use of clients of Informa Economics, Inc., only and may not be reproduced or electronically transmitted to other companies or individuals, whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Informa Economics, Inc. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable and the views expressed within this document reflect judgments at this time and are subject to change without notice. Informa Economics, Inc. does not guarantee that the information contained herein is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. © informa economics, inc. ii Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S. Agriculture December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. XI A. WORLD CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING PROJECT ...................................................................................... XI B. CONTAINER OCEAN CARRIER MARKET/VESSEL GROWTH IS DRIVING DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... XII C. DEFINED SURPLUS AND DEFICIT AREAS, NATIONALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY ................................................................. XII D. PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION BENEFITS U.S. AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................ XIII E. U.S. PORTS ...................................................................................................................................................... XIV F. INTERNATIONAL DESTINATION PORTS .................................................................................................................... XIV G. U.S. GRAIN AND SOYBEAN EXPORT CAPACITY GROWTH ............................................................................................ XV H. INLAND INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................... XV II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 III. BASELINE ECONOMIC AND CROP EXPORT OUTLOOK .................................................................................... 3 A. MACRO-ECONOMIC OUTLOOK ............................................................................................................................... 3 B. BASELINE CROP ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................................................................... 7 C. INFORMA CROP BALANCE SHEETS ............................................................................................................................ 8 D. COMMODITY PRICING ......................................................................................................................................... 15 E. GRAIN AND SOYBEAN EXPORTS BY PORT ................................................................................................................. 17 F. TIMING OF EXPORTS ........................................................................................................................................... 19 G. MAJOR IMPORTING COUNTRIES ............................................................................................................................ 22 H. GRAIN EXPORTS BY PORT TO MAJOR END USER ....................................................................................................... 28 IV. PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION PROJECT ....................................................................................................... 31 A. PANAMA CANAL TRANSIT STATISTICS ..................................................................................................................... 31 B. PANAMA CANAL TOLL REVENUES .......................................................................................................................... 38 C. IMPORTANCE OF PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION TO OCEAN FLEETS................................................................................. 43 D. REVIEW OF BOARD STRUCTURE OVERSEEING EXPANSION ........................................................................................... 45 E. KEY EXPANSION DESIGN ELEMENTS AND PROJECT PROGRESS ...................................................................................... 46 F. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS AND PLANS TO REPAY COSTS .......................................................................................... 53 G. CHALLENGES AND OBSTACLES GOING FORWARD ...................................................................................................... 55 V. PORT PROFILES ........................................................................................................................................... 57 A. U.S. PORT PROFILES ........................................................................................................................................... 57 B. ORGANIZATIONS AND PORT AUTHORITIES WITH MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) ....................................... 62 C. U.S. PORTS WITH MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY, AND CANAL PLANNED EXPANSION EFFORTS .................................................................................................................................................... 69 D. ASIAN PORTS THAT RECEIVE GRAINS, SOYBEANS AND PRODUCTS ................................................................................ 79 E. OTHER FOREIGN PORTS WITH MOUS, AND OTHER EXPANSION EFFORTS ...................................................................... 87 VI. U.S. TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................. 91 A. PUBLIC FUNDING FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................... 91 B. ELEVATORS AND CAPACITY ................................................................................................................................... 92 C. GRAIN DELIVERY DYNAMICS FOR EXPORT POSITIONING ........................................................................................... 101 VII. COMPANY PROFILES ............................................................................................................................ 122 A. LARGE GRAIN EXPORTER .................................................................................................................................... 122 B. LARGE U.S. RETAILER ........................................................................................................................................ 123 C. MULTI-NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL EXPORTER AND FOREIGN IMPORTER....................................................................... 126 D. INTERNATIONAL SUGAR PRODUCER...................................................................................................................... 127 E. GEORGIA PORTS AUTHORITY (GPA) .................................................................................................................... 128 © informa economics, inc. iii Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S. Agriculture December 2011 VIII. PRE- AND POST-PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION ..................................................................................... 130 A. TRANSPORTATION COSTS (CENTER GULF VERSUS PACIFIC NORTHWEST) ..................................................................... 130 B. TRANSPORTATION COSTS (TEXAS GULF VERSUS PACIFIC NORTHWEST) ....................................................................... 133 C. ADM POST PANAMAX SHIPS .............................................................................................................................. 134 D. ACCOMMODATE LARGER SHIPS ........................................................................................................................... 134 E. EAST COAST VERSUS WEST COAST ....................................................................................................................... 136 F. AGRICULTURE BENEFITTING VERSUS NON AGRICULTURE INDUSTRIES .......................................................................... 138 G. GULF TO ASIA VERSUS SOUTH AMERICA TO ASIA .................................................................................................... 138 IX. SPECIFIC ACTIONS REQUIRED TO ENSURE U.S. AGRICULTURE AND THE SOYBEAN INDUSTRY FULLY BENEFIT FROM EXPANDED PANAMA CANAL ................................................................................................................... 141 X. APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................. 142 © informa economics, inc. iv Panama Canal Expansion: Impact on U.S. Agriculture December 2011 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Real Retail Sales Indexed to the Starting Recession Month ........................... 5 Figure 2: U.S. Major Crop Aggregate Net Revenue ......................................................
Recommended publications
  • Competitiveness Analysis of China's Main Coastal Ports
    2019 International Conference on Economic Development and Management Science (EDMS 2019) Competitiveness analysis of China's main coastal ports Yu Zhua, * School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210000, China; [email protected] *Corresponding author Keywords: China coastal ports above a certain size, competitive power analysis, factor analysis, cluster analysis Abstract: As a big trading power, China's main mode of transportation of international trade goods is sea transportation. Ports play an important role in China's economic development. Therefore, improving the competitiveness of coastal ports is an urgent problem facing the society at present. This paper selects 12 relevant indexes to establish a relatively comprehensive evaluation index system, and uses factor analysis and cluster analysis to evaluate and rank the competitiveness of China's 30 major coastal ports. 1. Introduction Port is the gathering point and hub of water and land transportation, the distribution center of import and export of industrial and agricultural products and foreign trade products, and the important node of logistics. With the continuous innovation of transportation mode and the rapid development of science and technology, ports play an increasingly important role in driving the economy, with increasingly rich functions and more important status and role. Meanwhile, the competition among ports is also increasingly fierce. In recent years, with the rapid development of China's economy and the promotion of "the Belt and Road Initiative", China's coastal ports have also been greatly developed. China has more than 18,000 kilometers of coastline, with superior natural conditions. With the introduction of the policy of reformation and opening, the human conditions are also excellent.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Merchant Marine
    “China’s Merchant Marine” A paper for the China as “Maritime Power” Conference July 28-29, 2015 CNA Conference Facility Arlington, Virginia by Dennis J. Blasko1 Introductory Note: The Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook defines “merchant marine” as “all ships engaged in the carriage of goods; or all commercial vessels (as opposed to all nonmilitary ships), which excludes tugs, fishing vessels, offshore oil rigs, etc.”2 At the end of 2014, the world’s merchant ship fleet consisted of over 89,000 ships.3 According to the BBC: Under international law, every merchant ship must be registered with a country, known as its flag state. That country has jurisdiction over the vessel and is responsible for inspecting that it is safe to sail and to check on the crew’s working conditions. Open registries, sometimes referred to pejoratively as flags of convenience, have been contentious from the start.4 1 Dennis J. Blasko, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army (Retired), a Senior Research Fellow with CNA’s China Studies division, is a former U.S. army attaché to Beijing and Hong Kong and author of The Chinese Army Today (Routledge, 2006).The author wishes to express his sincere thanks and appreciation to Rear Admiral Michael McDevitt, U.S. Navy (Ret), for his guidance and patience in the preparation and presentation of this paper. 2 Central Intelligence Agency, “Country Comparison: Merchant Marine,” The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2108.html. According to the Factbook, “DWT or dead weight tonnage is the total weight of cargo, plus bunkers, stores, etc., that a ship can carry when immersed to the appropriate load line.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Exit Channel in Río De La Plata: a Preliminary Design Study
    New south exit channel in Río de la Plata: A preliminary design study Jelmer Brandt, Koen Minnee, Roel Winter, Stefan Gerrits & Victor Kramer TU Delft & University of Buenos Aires 17-11-2015 PREFACE During the Master of Civil Engineering at the TU Delft students can participate in a Multidisciplinary Project as part of their study curriculum. Student with different study backgrounds work together, simulating a small engineering consulting firm. Different aspects of a problem are regarded and a solution needs to be presented in a time-scope of 8 weeks. This project is often executed abroad. We took the opportunity to take this course and found a project in Buenos Aires, Argentina. During these two months we were able to apply our gained theoretical knowledge in a real time project setting. We experienced working and living in a in country with a significant culture difference. Argentina differs with the Netherlands in quite some areas, for example: Language, politics, economy and lifestyle. We had a great time being here working on the project as well as living in Buenos Aires. We would like to thank Ir. H.J. Verhagen (TU Delft) for getting us in touch with the University of Buenos Aires and for his project and content advise. Our supervisors, Eng. R. Escalante (Hídrovia S.A./UBA) in Buenos Aires, Ir. H. Verheij (TU Delft) and Prof. Ir. T. Vellinga (TU Delft) in The Netherlands, have been of great support providing the project group with advice and insights. We also had dinner with Dutch people in the Argentine water sector.
    [Show full text]
  • MN 20 of 2018 New Building Procedures – Ships and Boats
    South African Maritime Safety Authority Ref: SM6/5/2/1 Date: 7 June 2018 Marine Notice No. 20 of 2018 New Building Procedures – Ships and Boats TO SHIP/BOAT BUILDERS, NAVAL ARCHITECTS, VESSEL OWNERS, REGIONAL MANAGERS, PRINCIPAL OFFICERS, REGISTRAR OF SHIPS AND SURVEY STAFF. Summary The following marine notice provides guidance to industry on processes to be followed for plan approval and SAMSA attendance during a new building, of a ship or boat to achieve compliance with the Merchant Shipping Act 57 of 1951 and supporting regulations applicable to Non-SOLAS convention ships (class vessels) and boats (category vessels). 1. INTRODUCTION The Merchant Shipping Act and supporting regulations address vessel construction in a compliance based manner while the process of building a ship/boat is a dynamic one which requires evaluation of all elements and continuous confirmation that the changing of one or more parameters has not affected others negatively. The difference between the two approaches can be represented as follows: Regulatory Compliance-based Approach Ship/boat design process While the design process is meant to be completed before submission of plans to the Authority, it is important to realise that requirements for regulatory changes may affect other elements of the vessel design. It is accordingly important for SAMSA to play a timely role in the plan approval and survey process to avoid requirements for changes late in a project which may cause delays and additional costs or even affect the operational capability of the end product. It is also important for the owner/builder to understand the legislative framework in which he/she is working to allow SAMSA the opportunity to identify area’s of non-compliance at an early stage for the same reasons as those outlined above.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Marine Coastal Litters Around Zhoushan Island, China and Their Impacts
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article A Survey of Marine Coastal Litters around Zhoushan Island, China and Their Impacts Xuehua Ma 1, Yi Zhou 1, Luyi Yang 1 and Jianfeng Tong 1,2,3,* 1 College of Marine Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; [email protected] (X.M.); [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (L.Y.) 2 National Engineering Research Center for Oceanic Fisheries, Shanghai 201306, China 3 Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Marine Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Rapid development of the economy increased marine litter around Zhoushan Island. Social- ecological scenario studies can help to develop strategies to adapt to such change. To investigate the present situation of marine litter pollution, a stratified random sampling (StRS) method was applied to survey the distribution of marine coastal litters around Zhoushan Island. A univariate analysis of variance was conducted to access the amount of litter in different landforms that include mudflats, artificial and rocky beaches. In addition, two questionnaires were designed for local fishermen and tourists to provide social scenarios. The results showed that the distribution of litter in different landforms was significantly different, while the distribution of litter in different sampling points had no significant difference. The StRS survey showed to be a valuable method for giving a relative overview of beach litter around Zhoushan Island with less effort in a future survey. The questionnaire feedbacks helped to understand the source of marine litter and showed the impact on the local environment and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
    China Data Supplement March 2008 J People’s Republic of China J Hong Kong SAR J Macau SAR J Taiwan ISSN 0943-7533 China aktuell Data Supplement – PRC, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan 1 Contents The Main National Leadership of the PRC ......................................................................... 2 LIU Jen-Kai The Main Provincial Leadership of the PRC ..................................................................... 31 LIU Jen-Kai Data on Changes in PRC Main Leadership ...................................................................... 38 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Agreements with Foreign Countries ......................................................................... 54 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Laws and Regulations .............................................................................................. 56 LIU Jen-Kai Hong Kong SAR ................................................................................................................ 58 LIU Jen-Kai Macau SAR ....................................................................................................................... 65 LIU Jen-Kai Taiwan .............................................................................................................................. 69 LIU Jen-Kai ISSN 0943-7533 All information given here is derived from generally accessible sources. Publisher/Distributor: GIGA Institute of Asian Studies Rothenbaumchaussee 32 20148 Hamburg Germany Phone: +49 (0 40) 42 88 74-0 Fax: +49 (040) 4107945 2 March 2008 The Main National Leadership of the
    [Show full text]
  • Pollutants Emitted from Typical Chinese Vessels: Potential Contributions to Ozone and Secondary Organic Aerosols
    Journal of Cleaner Production 238 (2019) 117862 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Pollutants emitted from typical Chinese vessels: Potential contributions to ozone and secondary organic aerosols ** Di Wu a, Xiang Ding a, Qing Li a, b, , Jianfeng Sun a, Cheng Huang c, Lan Yao a, * Xinming Wang d, Xingnan Ye a, b, Yingjun Chen a, Hong He e, Jianmin Chen a, b, e, a Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China b Shanghai Institute of Eco-Chongming (SIEC), No. 3663 Northern Zhongshan Road, Shanghai, 200062, China c State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Formation and Prevention of Urban Air Pollution Complex, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai, 200233, China d State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China e Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, 361021, China article info abstract Article history: Pollutants emitted from ships have adverse effects on the atmospheric environment. In this study, the Received 5 May 2019 atmospheric impact of gaseous and particulate pollutants emitted in the exhaust of typical ships was Received in revised form estimated based on real-world measurements obtained under conditions of various engine speeds and 3 July 2019 fuel types. The results showed that PM emission factors (EFs) ranged between 0.38 ± 0.01 and Accepted 31 July 2019 2.5 1.05 ± 0.04 g/kg fuel, and tended to increase with engine speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jiangsu(PDF/288KB)
    Mizuho Bank China Business Promotion Division Jiangsu Province Overview Abbreviated Name Su Provincial Capital Nanjing Administrative 13 cities and 45 counties Divisions Secretary of the Luo Zhijun; Provincial Party Li Xueyong Committee; Mayor 2 Size 102,600 km Shandong Annual Mean 16.2°C Jiangsu Temperature Anhui Shanghai Annual Precipitation 861.9 mm Zhejiang Official Government www.jiangsu.gov.cn URL Note: Personnel information as of September 2014 [Economic Scale] Unit 2012 2013 National Share (%) Ranking Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 100 Million RMB 54,058 59,162 2 10.4 Per Capita GDP RMB 68,347 74,607 4 - Value-added Industrial Output (enterprises above a designated 100 Million RMB N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. size) Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery 100 Million RMB 5,809 6,158 3 6.3 Output Total Investment in Fixed Assets 100 Million RMB 30,854 36,373 2 8.2 Fiscal Revenue 100 Million RMB 5,861 6,568 2 5.1 Fiscal Expenditure 100 Million RMB 7,028 7,798 2 5.6 Total Retail Sales of Consumer 100 Million RMB 18,331 20,797 3 8.7 Goods Foreign Currency Revenue from Million USD 6,300 2,380 10 4.6 Inbound Tourism Export Value Million USD 328,524 328,857 2 14.9 Import Value Million USD 219,438 221,987 4 11.4 Export Surplus Million USD 109,086 106,870 3 16.3 Total Import and Export Value Million USD 547,961 550,844 2 13.2 Foreign Direct Investment No. of contracts 4,156 3,453 N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curious Double-Life of Putuoshan As Monastic Centre and Commercial Emporium, 1684–1728 113 ©2021 by RCHSS, Academia Sinica
    Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy Volume 33, Number 1, pp. 113–140 The Curious Double-Life of Putuoshan as Monastic Centre and Commercial Emporium, 1684–1728 113 ©2021 by RCHSS, Academia Sinica. All rights reserved. The Curious Double-Life of Putuoshan as Monastic Centre and Commercial Emporium, 1684–1728✽ Ryan Holroyd✽✽ Postdoctoral Research Associate Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica ABSTRACT This article investigates how the island of Putuoshan simultaneously acted as a Buddhist monastic centre and a maritime shipping hub from the Qing dynasty’s legalisation of overseas trade in 1684 until the 1720s. It argues that because overseas trade during the Kangxi era was inconsistently regulated, a mutually beneficial relationship developed between Putuoshan’s Buddhist mon- asteries, the merchants who sailed between China and Japan, and the regional naval commanders on Zhoushan. Instead of forcing merchant vessels to enter ports with customs offices, the naval commanders allowed merchants to use Putuoshan’s harbour, which lay beyond the empire’s trade administration system. The monasteries enjoyed the patronage of the merchants, and so rewarded the naval commanders by publicly honouring them. However, a reorganisation of the empire’s customs system in the mid–1720s shifted the power over trade to Zhejiang’s governor general, who brought an end to Putuoshan’s special status outside the administration around 1728. Key Words: maritime trade, Qing dynasty, Putuoshan, Buddhist history ✽I would like to express my gratitude to Liu Shiuh-Feng, Wu Hsin-fang, Su Shu-Wei, and the two anonymous reviewers of my paper for taking the time to read it and for offering patient and helpful advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Development in Guangdong; Unequal Opportunities and Limited Development in a Market Economy
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2012 Women's Development in Guangdong; Unequal Opportunities and Limited Development in a Market Economy Ying Hua Yue CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/169 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Running head: WOMEN’S DEVELOPMENT IN GUANGDONG 1 Women’s Development in Guangdong: Unequal Opportunities and Limited Development in a Market Economy Yinghua Yue The City College of New York In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Sociology Fall 2012 WOMEN’ S DEVELOPMENT IN GUANGDONG 2 ABSTRACT In the context of China’s three-decade market-oriented economic reform, in which economic development has long been prioritized, women’s development, as one of the social undertakings peripheral to economic development, has relatively lagged behind. This research is an attempt to unfold the current situation of women’s development within such context by studying the case of Guangdong -- the province as forerunner of China’s economic reform and opening-up -- drawing on current primary resources. First, this study reveals mixed results for women’s development in Guangdong: achievements have been made in education, employment and political participation in terms of “rates” and “numbers,” and small “breakthroughs” have taken place in legislation and women’s awareness of their equal rights and interests; however, limitations and challenges, like disparities between different women groups in addition to gender disparity, continue to exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Rotterdam Made by Chinese
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Peverelli, Peter J. Working Paper Port of Rotterdam in Chinese Eyes Copenhagen Discussion Papers, No. 2007-19 Provided in Cooperation with: Asia Research Community (ARC), Copenhagen Business School (CBS) Suggested Citation: Peverelli, Peter J. (2007) : Port of Rotterdam in Chinese Eyes, Copenhagen Discussion Papers, No. 2007-19, Copenhagen Business School (CBS), Asia Research Centre (ARC), Frederiksberg, http://hdl.handle.net/10398/7406 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/208619 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ www.econstor.eu 19 2007 May Port of Rotterdam in Chinese Eyes Peter J.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Final Report on Mtcp Tonnage Measurement Study
    Tonnage Measurement Study MTCP Work Package 2.1 Quality and Efficiency Final Report Bremen /Brussels, November 2006 Disclaimer: The use of any knowledge, information or data contained in this document shall be at the user's sole risk. The members of the Maritime Transport Coordination Platform accepts no liability or responsibility, in negligence or otherwise, for any loss, damage or expense whatever sustained by any person as a result of the use, in any manner or form, of any knowledge, information or data contained in this document, or due to any inaccuracy, omission or error therein contained. The contents and the views expressed in the document remain the responsibility of the Maritime Transport Coordination Platform. The European Community shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the use of any such knowledge, information or data, or of the consequences thereof. Content 0. Executive Summary............................................................................................1 1 Introduction and Background ............................................................................2 2 Structure of Report..............................................................................................3 3. The London Tonnage Convention (1969) .......................................................4 3.1 Brief History..................................................................................................4 3.2 Purpose and Regulations of the Convention..................................................5 3.3 Definitions......................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]