Credit Proposal Process in OBCFPM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Credit Proposal Process in OBCFPM Credit Proposal User Guide Oracle Banking Credit Facilities Process Management Release 14.5.0.0.0 Part No. F42343-01 May 2021 Oracle Banking Credit Facilities Process Management User Guide Oracle Financial Services Software Limited Oracle Park Off Western Express Highway Goregaon (East) Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 063 India Worldwide Inquiries: Phone: +91 22 6718 3000 Fax: +91 22 6718 3001 www.oracle.com/financialservices/ Copyright © 2007, 2021, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hard- ware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are “commercial computer software” pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs. No other rights are granted to the U.S. Government. This software or hardware is developed for general use in a variety of information management applications. It is not developed or intended for use in any inherently dangerous applications, including applications that may create a risk of personal injury. If you use this software or hardware in dangerous applications, then you shall be responsible to take all appropriate failsafe, backup, redundancy, and other measures to ensure its safe use. Oracle Corporation and its affiliates disclaim any liability for any damages caused by use of this software or hardware in dangerous applications. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are pro- tected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, repro- duce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. This software or hardware and documentation may provide access to or information on content, products and services from third parties. Oracle Corporation and its affiliates are not responsible for and expressly disclaim all warranties of any kind with respect to third-party content, products, and services. Oracle Corporation and its affiliates will not be responsible for any loss, costs, or damages incurred due to your access to or use of third-party content, products, or services. Table of Contents Preface .............................................................................................................1 About this guide .......................................................................................................... 1 Intended Audience ..................................................................................................... 1 Conventions Used ...................................................................................................... 1 Common Icons in OBCFPM ....................................................................................... 1 About Credit Proposal ......................................................................................3 Credit Proposal Stages .....................................................................................3 Proposal Initiation .............................................................................................5 Creating Application ................................................................................................... 7 Enriching Application ................................................................................................ 14 Proposal Enrichment ......................................................................................44 Summary .................................................................................................................. 45 Customer Info ........................................................................................................... 47 Writeup ..................................................................................................................... 67 Funding Requirement ............................................................................................... 67 Collaterals ................................................................................................................. 68 Comments ................................................................................................................ 86 Proposal Evaluation ........................................................................................89 Credit Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 89 Legal Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 98 Risk Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 106 KYC Check ...................................................................................................108 Proposal Structuring .....................................................................................117 Proposal Review ...........................................................................................155 Proposal Approval ........................................................................................156 Draft Generation ...........................................................................................159 Customer Acceptance ..................................................................................167 Limit Configuration ........................................................................................175 Handoff to Back Office System .....................................................................184 Handoff - Manual Retry ................................................................................185 Appendix .......................................................................................................190 Document Upload and Checklist ............................................................................ 190 Business Overrides ................................................................................................ 192 Reference and Feedback .............................................................................194 References ............................................................................................................. 194 Feedback and Support ........................................................................................... 194 Chapter 1 - Preface Preface About this guide e This guide provides the user with all the information necessary to perform credit proposal d i process in OBCFPM. u G r Intended Audience e s U This document is intended for the banking personnel responsible for performing credit l a proposal process for the corporate customer. s o p Conventions Used o r The following table lists the conventions that are used in this document: P t i d Convention Description e r C Italic Italic denotes a screen name Bold indicates • Field name Bold • Drop down options • Other UX labels This icon indicates a note This icon indicates a tip This icon indicates a warning Copyright 2007 - 2021, Oracle and its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Credit Proposal User Guide Chapter Chapter The following table describes the icons that are commonly used in OBCFPM: inused icons are commonly that describes tablethe The following in OBCFPM Common Icons Copyright 2007 - 2021, Oracle and its affiliates. All rights reserved. rights its and 2021, Oracle reserved. -affiliates. All Copyright 2007 Icons 1 Edit icon iconDelete icon/ Configurationsettings Calendar icon Add icon Icon Name - Preface 2 Credit Proposal User Guide Chapter Chapter The following flow diagram illustrates the different stages in Credit Proposal process: Credit Proposal stages in different diagram flowthe illustrates The following the personnel based structure. bankingbank’s on different person or performed same either a by stages canbe draft of these Each generation. initiation to proposal from stages different through passed is application proposal credit OBCFPM, In Stages Credit Proposal customer. credit worthiness of the the to determine evaluated is and captured organization the variousabout information During process, this customer. corporate to a facility credit lending for application the evaluating and creating of process the is proposal Credit Proposal About Credit Copyright 2007 - 2021, Oracle and its affiliates. All rights reserved. rights its and 2021, Oracle reserved. -affiliates. All Copyright 2007 implementation. implementation. part asof requirement on their of the based various flow process stages in to appear data segments can Banks the configure aflow. model is manual user this
Recommended publications
  • In This Issue …
    In This Issue … INLAND SEAS®VOLUME 72 WINTER 2016 NUMBER 4 MAUMEE VALLEY COMES HOME . 290 by Christopher H. Gillcrist KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING . 292 by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University RUNNING OUT OF STEAM, NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS FROM THE SS HERBERT C. JACKSON . 319 by Patrick D. Lapinski NATIONAL RECREATION AREAS AND THE CREATION OF PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE . 344 by Kathy S. Mason BOOKS . 354 GREAT LAKES NEWS . 356 by Greg Rudnick MUSEUM COLUMN . 374 by Carrie Sowden 289 KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University n the morning of July 24, 1915, hundreds of employees of the West- Oern Electric Company and their families boarded the passenger steamship Eastland for a day trip to Michigan City, Indiana. Built in 1903, this twin screw, steel hulled steamship was considered a fast boat on her regular run. Yet throughout her service life, her design revealed a series of problems with stability. Additionally, changes such as more lifeboats in the aftermath of the Titanic disaster, repositioning of engines, and alterations to her upper cabins, made these built-in issues far worse. These failings would come to a disastrous head at the dock on the Chicago River. With over 2,500 passengers aboard, the ship heeled back and forth as the chief engineer struggled to control the ship’s stability and failed. At 7:30 a.m., the Eastland heeled to port, coming to rest on the river bottom, trapping pas- sengers inside the hull and throwing many more into the river.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Exit Channel in Río De La Plata: a Preliminary Design Study
    New south exit channel in Río de la Plata: A preliminary design study Jelmer Brandt, Koen Minnee, Roel Winter, Stefan Gerrits & Victor Kramer TU Delft & University of Buenos Aires 17-11-2015 PREFACE During the Master of Civil Engineering at the TU Delft students can participate in a Multidisciplinary Project as part of their study curriculum. Student with different study backgrounds work together, simulating a small engineering consulting firm. Different aspects of a problem are regarded and a solution needs to be presented in a time-scope of 8 weeks. This project is often executed abroad. We took the opportunity to take this course and found a project in Buenos Aires, Argentina. During these two months we were able to apply our gained theoretical knowledge in a real time project setting. We experienced working and living in a in country with a significant culture difference. Argentina differs with the Netherlands in quite some areas, for example: Language, politics, economy and lifestyle. We had a great time being here working on the project as well as living in Buenos Aires. We would like to thank Ir. H.J. Verhagen (TU Delft) for getting us in touch with the University of Buenos Aires and for his project and content advise. Our supervisors, Eng. R. Escalante (Hídrovia S.A./UBA) in Buenos Aires, Ir. H. Verheij (TU Delft) and Prof. Ir. T. Vellinga (TU Delft) in The Netherlands, have been of great support providing the project group with advice and insights. We also had dinner with Dutch people in the Argentine water sector.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Profile
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Profile Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX) is a global provider of shipping transportation services. We specialize in the ownership of dry bulk vessels. As of April 28, 2017 our fleet consists of 48 dry bulk vessels (4 Newcastlemax, 14 Capesize, 3 Post-Panamax, 4 Kamsarmax and 23 Panamax). The Company also expects to take delivery of one Post-Panamax dry bulk vessel by the middle of May 2017, one Post-Panamax dry bulk vessel by the middle of June 2017 as well as one Kamsarmax dry bulk vessel by the middle of June 2017. As of the same date, the combined carrying capacity of our fleet, excluding the three vessels not yet delivered, is approximately 5.7 million dwt with a weighted average age of 7.91 years. Our fleet is managed by our wholly-owned subsidiary Diana Shipping Services S.A. and our established 50/50 joint venture with Wilhelmsen Ship Management named Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited in Cyprus. Diana Shipping Inc. also owns approximately 25.7% of the issued and outstanding shares of Diana Containerships Inc. (NASDAQ: DCIX), a global provider of shipping transportation services through its ownership of containerships, that currently owns and operates twelve container vessels (6 Post-Panamax and 6 Panamax). Among the distinguishing strengths that we believe provide us with a competitive advantage in the dry bulk shipping industry are the following: > We own a modern, high quality fleet of dry bulk carriers. > Our fleet includes groups of sister ships, providing operational and scheduling flexibility, as well as cost efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch's Elements of Shipping/Alan E
    ‘I would strongly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in shipping or taking a course where shipping is an important element, for example, chartering and broking, maritime transport, exporting and importing, ship management, and international trade. Using an approach of simple analysis and pragmatism, the book provides clear explanations of the basic elements of ship operations and commercial, legal, economic, technical, managerial, logistical, and financial aspects of shipping.’ Dr Jiangang Fei, National Centre for Ports & Shipping, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia ‘Branch’s Elements of Shipping provides the reader with the best all-round examination of the many elements of the international shipping industry. This edition serves as a fitting tribute to Alan Branch and is an essential text for anyone with an interest in global shipping.’ David Adkins, Lecturer in International Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University ‘Combining the traditional with the modern is as much a challenge as illuminating operations without getting lost in the fascination of the technical detail. This is particularly true for the world of shipping! Branch’s Elements of Shipping is an ongoing example for mastering these challenges. With its clear maritime focus it provides a very comprehensive knowledge base for relevant terms and details and it is a useful source of expertise for students and practitioners in the field.’ Günter Prockl, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark This page intentionally left blank Branch’s Elements of Shipping Since it was first published in 1964, Elements of Shipping has become established as a market leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector
    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Economies of Scale for Reductions in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Shipping
    Energy Policy 46 (2012) 386–398 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping Haakon Lindstad a,b,n, Bjørn E. Asbjørnslett a, Anders H. Strømman a a Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway b Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute (MARINTEK), NO-7450 Trondheim, Norway article info abstract Article history: CO2 emissions from maritime transport represent 3.3% of the world’s total CO2 emissions and are Received 15 August 2011 forecast to increase by 150%–250% by 2050, due to increased freight volumes (Second IMO GHG study, Accepted 29 March 2012 2009). Fulfilling anticipated climate requirements (IPCC, 2007) could require the sector to reduce Available online 19 April 2012 emissions per freight unit by a factor of five or six. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is Keywords: currently debating technical, operational and market-based measures for reducing greenhouse gas Maritime transport emissions from shipping. This paper also investigates the effects of economies of scale on the direct Economies of scale emissions and costs of maritime transport. We compared emissions from the current fleet (2007), with Greenhouse gas emissions what can be achieved by increasing average vessel size. The comparison is based on the 2007 levels of trade and predictions for 2050. The results show that emissions can be reduced by up to 30% at a negative abatement cost per ton of CO2 by replacing the existing fleet with larger vessels. Replacing the whole fleet might take as long as 25 years, so the reduction in emissions will be achieved gradually as the current fleet is renewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2011
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2011 Report by the UNCTAD secretariat Chapter 2 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2011 2 STRUCTURE, OWNERSHIP AND REGISTRATION OF THE WORLD FLEET CHAPTER 2 The year 2010 saw record deliveries of new tonnage, 28 per cent higher than in 2009, resulting in an 8.6 per cent growth in the world eet. The world merchant eet reached almost 1.4 billion deadweight tons in January 2011, an increase of 120 million dwt over 2010. New deliveries stood at 150 million dwt, against demolitions and other withdrawals from the market of approximately 30 million dwt. Since 2005, the dry bulk eet has almost doubled, and the containership eet has nearly tripled. The share of foreign- agged tonnage reached an estimated 68 per cent in January 2011. This chapter presents the supply-side dynamics of the world maritime industry. It covers the structure, age prole, ownership and registration of the world eet. The chapter also reviews deliveries, demolitions, and tonnage on order. 36 Review of MaRitiMe tRanspoRt 2011 A. structure of the world fleet The share of dry bulk tonnage has gone up from 27 per cent to 38 per cent since 1980, while the share of 1. world fleet growth and principal oil tankers has decreased from almost 50 per cent to vessel types 34 per cent. The world fleet in 2011 Long-term trends in vessel types In January 2011, there were 103,392 seagoing The composition of the world fleet reflects the demands commercial ships in service, with a combined tonnage for seaborne trade of different commodities, including of 1,396 million dwt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Types & Sizes
    The Source for Maritime Information and Insight Chris Pålsson, Director, IHS Fairplay Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Size matters Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Endorsed by the IMSF 2011 Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4 Basis for size categories • Dimensional limitations – Passages, straits, canals, bridges, locks….. • Operational – Rate setting mechanisms – Cargo batch sizes – Type of service – Range of service – ….. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Lingo • Handysize, small/large • VLCC • Handymax, large • ULCC • Supramax • VLGC • Panamax, sub/post/new • Feeder • Kamsarmax • ULCS • Capesize, mini • Seawaymax • VLOC • Chinamax • MR, small/large • Q-max • Aframax • Säfflemax • Suezmax • …. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 Dimensional limitations Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Panama Canal Panamax – L 294.1 m – B 32.3 m – D 12.04 m – H 61.3 New Panamax – L 366 m – B 49 m – D 15.2 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. – H 61.3 8 Suez Canal Suez Canal Bridge Shohada 25 January Bridge Egyptian-Japanese Friendship Bridge Max draft: 20.1 m, Max height: 68 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 The Strait of Malacca Depth 25 m. Max draft 21 m. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 St Lawrence Seaway • L 225.6 m (740 feet) • B 23.8 m (78 feet) • D 7.9 m (26 feet) • H 35.5 m (116 feet) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Qatar: Q-max • L 345 m (1,132 ft) • B 53.8 m (177 ft) • H 34.7 m (114 ft) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Bulk / Quantity Measurements and Other Challenges
    Liquid Bulk / Quantity Measurements and other challenges Prepared by Jorge Pecci, SafeWaters UM Disclaimer: AIMU is committed to advancing the educational, governmental, regulatory and technical interests of the ocean marine insurance industry. One of the services AIMU provides for its members is the provision of education and publishing of information for use by underwriters, loss control and claims specialists, and other interested parties. Volunteer members of a committee and/or staff of AIMU have produced this information. Committee members abide by antitrust restrictions and all other applicable laws and regulations while compiling information. It is generally not possible to treat any one subject in an exhaustive manner, nor is it AIMU’s intent to do so. No representations or warranties are made regarding the thoroughness or accuracy of the information. Introduction: Quantity of crude oil or petroleum product(s) loaded, assessed by measurements done ashore at the terminal and afterwards shippers enter these figures in the bill of lading. On the other hand ship’s figures ascertained on board by way of measurement of ship’s tanks and concomitant calculations done by especially appointed surveyor together with responsible for cargo operations ship’s officer, normally Chief Mate. These figures obtained ashore and on board of tanker, as a rule, differ from each other. There are many factors contributing to these discrepancies such as superseded tables used by the terminal in the calculation of Bill of Lading quantities, inaccurate vessel experience factor, Cargo Custody transfer practices and the competency of Cargo Inspectors and crew. These discrepancies product of errors in calculation eventually evolve in what is normally called in insurance “paper loss”.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results
    Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results January 15, 2019 AIR RESOURCES BOARD 1 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels Contents 1. Summary and Background...................................................................................... 5 2. Ocean-Going Vessel Background and Description ................................................. 6 2.1. Ocean-Going Vessel Marine Engines and Operations ................................ 9 2.2. Geographical Areas..................................................................................... 9 3. General Emissions Inventory Methodology and Sources...................................... 12 3.1. Base Year Vessel Visits and Time At Berth............................................... 13 3.2. Vessel Visit Length .................................................................................... 15 3.3. Effective Power (EP) ................................................................................. 19 3.4. Emission Factors (EF) ............................................................................... 22 4. Future Year Forecasts........................................................................................... 22 4.1. Freight Analysis Framework ...................................................................... 23 4.2. Mercator Forecast for Ports of LA/LB ........................................................ 27 4.3. Engine Tier Availability and Introduction...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives for Replacing Enbridge's Dual Line 5 Pipelines Crossing The
    Report to the State of Michigan Alternatives for replacing Enbridge’s dual Line 5 pipelines crossing the Straits of Mackinac June 15, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 The Purpose of This Report 1 Summary of Key Conclusions 1 Summary Comparison of the Two Feasible Alternatives 5 Reporting Parameters and Process 6 How Enbridge Defines Feasibility in the Context of This Report 6 How Enbridge Prepared This Report 6 Consultants for the Three Alternatives Feasibility Assessments 7 Enbridge’s Line 5 in Michigan 8 Alternative: Tunnel 10 Highlights of the Tunnel Alternative 10 Overview of Underwater Tunnels 11 Tunnel planning and design 11 Tunnel construction 12 Tunnel lining 13 Pipe installation 13 Tunnel access 14 Summary of Feasibility Study for a Line 5 Tunnel under the Straits 16 Tunnel consultants 16 Tunnel feasibility 16 Tunnel configuration options 17 Straits tunnel specifications 18 Geological considerations 19 Tunnel depth 20 Tunnel diameter and lining 21 Placing other utilities in the tunnel 22 TBM type 22 Approximate construction sequence 23 TBM launch and reception 23 Spoil handling and disposal 24 Pipeline installation 24 Independent Assessment of Hatch’s Tunnel Feasibility Study 25 Construction Cost Estimate 25 Project Execution Schedule 25 Tunnel Permits and Approvals 25 Tunnel Risk Assessment 26 Geologic hazards 26 Report to the State of Michigan—Alternatives for replacing Enbridge’s dual Line 5 pipelines crossing the Straits of Mackinac Alternative: Open Cut With Secondary Containment 28 Highlights of the ‘Open Cut with
    [Show full text]
  • New Trends in Maritime Transportation and Port Activity
    V.E. Chapapría, Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., Vol. 1, No. 4 (2017) 624–632 NEW TRENDS IN MARITIME TRANSPORTATION AND PORT ACTIVITY VICENT ESTEBAN CHAPAPRÍA Ports and Coastal Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain ABSTRACT The role of ports has changed and has become more complex. Ports play a relevant role in global economy. They connect modes of transport and usually they are the leaders in the logistics chain. New works in Suez Canal were in progress until August 2015. The expansion of the Panama Canal will finish this year. These new operational conditions allow for an improvement of international maritime transportation. The Suez Canal Corridor Area Project is a mega project in Egypt that was officially launched in August 2014. The project’s aim is to increase the role of the Suez Canal region in international trading and to develop the three canal cities: Suez, Ismaïlia and Port Said. The importance of these actions changes in the new port cities and new trends and conditions in maritime transportation are discussed. Keywords: maritime transportation, Panama Canal expansion project, ports, port cities, Suez Canal. 1 INTRODUCTION The role of ports has changed and has become much more complex over time. Today, ports must be analysed on the basis of their role in the logistics or supply chains of which they form a part. The port must offer connectivity between the modes of transport in an environmen- tally integrated and respectful way (co-modality). Ports must provide infrastructure, facilities and handling equipment. Moreover, they must bridge the gap between modes of transport in terms of frequency, capacity and time.
    [Show full text]