U.S. Great Lakes Seaway Ports Enjoying Magic Grain Season

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Great Lakes Seaway Ports Enjoying Magic Grain Season FALL 2010 U.S. Great Lakes Seaway Ports Enjoying Magic Grain Season Freight Rates Luring Salties to Seaway U.S. grain tonnage shipped through the St. Lawrence Seaway this year by both Seawaymax ocean-going vessels and Canadian lakers has S increased by more than 36 percent over 2009 navigation season num - ADMINISTRATOR ’S bers with almost 1.3 million metric tons shipped through September 30. COLUMN Part of the reason for the big bump up in tonnage can be attributed to e Nature’s generosity in providing excellent weather during the growing season. Farmers deserve kudos for having had the foresight to increase grain acreage planted. a U . Collister S . Johnson, Jr. Seed, sunshine, rain, labo r— all are vita l— but are not enough reasons D e w for a exceptional year for grain on the southern side of the Great Lakes. p a r t The price of grain, especially wheat, has been substantially higher since m e late July than most analysts projected two brief months earlier. n t o f a T Record rainfall in a huge swathe of the Canadian Prairie provinces r The Future is Bright a n spelled trouble in June. In a few days, a major chunk of the season s p There is no doubt that we are was lost. Meanwhile intense heat baked fields in Russia, Ukraine and o r y t witnessing good things happen - a Kazakhstan laying waste wheat crops that had been slated to be export - t i o ing in the Great Lakes Seaway n ed to global markets. Wild fires burning fields and forests worsened System this year and the future • the crisis, and Russia’s President forbid grain exports through the year’s C looks positive. Cargo shipments S end to allay public concerns amid widespread price spikes. The action a i are rebounding, there’s an n t essentially tightened supply lines for key grain importers like Egypt L increase in new business and a o and India at a time when another major grain exporter, Australia, was w r trade routes, and these trends experiencing drought conditions. e n look to continue through the c e remainder of the navigation S m Global wheat prices spiked in August just as the U.S. harvest was getting e a season. In fact, this fall will underway. In September, grain prices dropped as it became clear that w a likely see continued robust y ample stocks were on hand. Still, wheat prices have remained relatively D American grain shipments to e high to the delight of farmers, the marine industry, supply chain profes - v cap off the 68 percent surge we e l sionals and the chagrin of bargain conscious consumers. o p p continued on page 2 m e The clear winner has been the American farmer, and U.S. Great Lakes n t C ports and the St. Lawrence Seaway. Why have the latter profited so o a r p much when one considers that typically this region ships less than o In This Issue: r a t i continued on page 3 o Highlighted Guest, Ross Gaudreault n s SLSMC Appoints New President/CEO Lifting of Canadian Import Duty s Environmental Scientist Supports SLSDC SLSDC Employee Honored by Secretary of Transportation International Container Service Great Lakes Ballast Water Collaborative Port of Burns Harbor Celebrates 40 Years of Business Melford and Maher Terminals Join Forces EPA Publishes a Notice in the Federal Register www.greatlakes-seaway.com FALL 2010 S Administrator’s Colum n, continued from page 1 environmentally responsible alternative to the existing realized through September. The recovering economy is surface modes of transportation. Their operating vessels e reflected in the demand for raw materials in the Great are modern, state-of-the-art, fit-for-purpose, short-sea Lakes, resulting in a boost in iron ore and steel shipments. shipping feeder vessels. The service promises to have a financial and environmental advantages for the greater Cleveland area and beyond, and its launch is much w Even while this season is bringing an uptick in cargoes and transits on the System, we all must be proactive in anticipated. developing new business, new cargoes, new routes, and a new vessels to grow the System. Cargo growth is our most Without a doubt, there are some regulatory hurdles pressing issue. At the top of the list for trade development that require attention; the myriad of state ballast water y is short sea shippin g— the movement of containers regulations, the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) on through the lakes. Most container traffic entering shipping, and various security-related challenges to C Montreal and Halifax is destined for the Midwest, name a few, that continue to place limitations on the demonstrating the need for expanded use of Great Lakes industry. Work continues on all these fronts with pos - o shipping. It is important to track trends to identify areas sible resolution of the HMT issue coming ever closer of focus. Much of the traffic from the Canadian ports to fruition. Along with 51 Members of Congress who m enters the U.S. on truck through congested bridges and have signed on as cosponsors of the HMT waiver border crossings. We need to capitalize on the efficiencies legislation (H.R. 3486), a litany of maritime trade of using maritime transportation to move these goods. associations and labor organizations has endorsed this p The Erie Inland Port project is doing just that. proposal and they continue their work to generate support for the bill. Although there are few legislative vehicles remaining in the 111 th Congress to which the a The Erie Inland Port is poised to begin container opera - tions with minor upgrades and equipment purchases. HMT bill might be attached, there is still a possibility this goal can be achieved. If not, the proposal will be s The Greater Erie Industrial Development Corporation was recently awarded a $500,000 grant from the reintroduced and return in an even stronger position s Department of Commerce to move the project forward. to be approved in the next Congress. The project is multifaceted and multimodal (with rail and highway connections) and is designed to alleviate a I think it’s worth noting that the November election number of problems related to shipping logistics and the brought some significant changes to Washington, D.C. environment by initiating more efficient and sustainable and in a number of state capitals around the Great methods of shipping and transportation of goods. There Lakes. Although we are losing some close Congressional are currently few alternatives for increasingly problem - friends of the Seaway System across the Great Lakes atic, time strapped and expensive modes of transportation states, there are some new faces and strong alliances that in the region. Container shipping in the Port of Erie we can look to for support in the new Congress. New would have certain measurable outcomes including committee chairmen will be chosen and members will reducing costs for shippers, relieving congestion on land vie for new leadership positions. There are six new gov - border crossings between the U.S. and Canada, reducing ernors in Great Lakes states, and they are familiar with emissions and energy consumption, and providing our issues. The education process will continue, but we savings on landside transportation infrastructure main - have come a long way in communicating our messages tenance. The project received the federal grant in large and developing good relationships with those making part because it was able to demonstrate the potential decisions that impact the maritime industry on the to create long-term, positive economic impacts in its Great Lakes. surrounding community. I believe this case can be replicated in other Great Lakes port communities. On another positive note, the Seaway’s Asset Renewal Plan is allowing us to ensure system reliability and infra - More and more, entrepreneurs are looking at cross lakes structure integrity. In just two years, over $33 million service that is rate and time competitive. Great Lakes has been spent to upgrade the U.S. locks and facilities Feeder Lines is currently working with the Port of and every indication is that the full ten year plan will Cleveland to develop a new container shipping service continue to receive Federal dollars annually. from Cleveland to Montreal that could begin as soon as next spring. It would provide a competitive, reliable, continued on page 3 2 FALL 2010 Administrator’s Colum n, continued from page 2 S and verifiable information about the Seaway System and its Also underway is an important evaluation of the economic users that can be widely utilized for educational purposes. e impact of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System. For the first time, in a single study, Canadian and U.S. benefits As we head into the final months of the 2010 shipping season, a and impacts will be evaluated to give a comprehensive snap I anticipate a strong finish and believe there is cause for shot of our binational system. This economic impact study continued optimism for next year and beyond. But we must w will serve to update Canadian and U.S. data regarding continue to be proactive and persistent in promoting mar - employment and tax revenue. Data will be provided at the itime transportation and the Great Lakes-Seaway System. regional level, by country (U.S./Canada), and by state and Get engaged in the debate, make your voice heard, and do a province. This study, scheduled for completion sometime your part to help get the facts about the industry out there early next year, will provide a great deal of critical, factual in the public domain.
Recommended publications
  • In This Issue …
    In This Issue … INLAND SEAS®VOLUME 72 WINTER 2016 NUMBER 4 MAUMEE VALLEY COMES HOME . 290 by Christopher H. Gillcrist KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING . 292 by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University RUNNING OUT OF STEAM, NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS FROM THE SS HERBERT C. JACKSON . 319 by Patrick D. Lapinski NATIONAL RECREATION AREAS AND THE CREATION OF PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE . 344 by Kathy S. Mason BOOKS . 354 GREAT LAKES NEWS . 356 by Greg Rudnick MUSEUM COLUMN . 374 by Carrie Sowden 289 KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University n the morning of July 24, 1915, hundreds of employees of the West- Oern Electric Company and their families boarded the passenger steamship Eastland for a day trip to Michigan City, Indiana. Built in 1903, this twin screw, steel hulled steamship was considered a fast boat on her regular run. Yet throughout her service life, her design revealed a series of problems with stability. Additionally, changes such as more lifeboats in the aftermath of the Titanic disaster, repositioning of engines, and alterations to her upper cabins, made these built-in issues far worse. These failings would come to a disastrous head at the dock on the Chicago River. With over 2,500 passengers aboard, the ship heeled back and forth as the chief engineer struggled to control the ship’s stability and failed. At 7:30 a.m., the Eastland heeled to port, coming to rest on the river bottom, trapping pas- sengers inside the hull and throwing many more into the river.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Profile
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Profile Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX) is a global provider of shipping transportation services. We specialize in the ownership of dry bulk vessels. As of April 28, 2017 our fleet consists of 48 dry bulk vessels (4 Newcastlemax, 14 Capesize, 3 Post-Panamax, 4 Kamsarmax and 23 Panamax). The Company also expects to take delivery of one Post-Panamax dry bulk vessel by the middle of May 2017, one Post-Panamax dry bulk vessel by the middle of June 2017 as well as one Kamsarmax dry bulk vessel by the middle of June 2017. As of the same date, the combined carrying capacity of our fleet, excluding the three vessels not yet delivered, is approximately 5.7 million dwt with a weighted average age of 7.91 years. Our fleet is managed by our wholly-owned subsidiary Diana Shipping Services S.A. and our established 50/50 joint venture with Wilhelmsen Ship Management named Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited in Cyprus. Diana Shipping Inc. also owns approximately 25.7% of the issued and outstanding shares of Diana Containerships Inc. (NASDAQ: DCIX), a global provider of shipping transportation services through its ownership of containerships, that currently owns and operates twelve container vessels (6 Post-Panamax and 6 Panamax). Among the distinguishing strengths that we believe provide us with a competitive advantage in the dry bulk shipping industry are the following: > We own a modern, high quality fleet of dry bulk carriers. > Our fleet includes groups of sister ships, providing operational and scheduling flexibility, as well as cost efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector
    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Types & Sizes
    The Source for Maritime Information and Insight Chris Pålsson, Director, IHS Fairplay Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Size matters Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Endorsed by the IMSF 2011 Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4 Basis for size categories • Dimensional limitations – Passages, straits, canals, bridges, locks….. • Operational – Rate setting mechanisms – Cargo batch sizes – Type of service – Range of service – ….. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Lingo • Handysize, small/large • VLCC • Handymax, large • ULCC • Supramax • VLGC • Panamax, sub/post/new • Feeder • Kamsarmax • ULCS • Capesize, mini • Seawaymax • VLOC • Chinamax • MR, small/large • Q-max • Aframax • Säfflemax • Suezmax • …. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 Dimensional limitations Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Panama Canal Panamax – L 294.1 m – B 32.3 m – D 12.04 m – H 61.3 New Panamax – L 366 m – B 49 m – D 15.2 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. – H 61.3 8 Suez Canal Suez Canal Bridge Shohada 25 January Bridge Egyptian-Japanese Friendship Bridge Max draft: 20.1 m, Max height: 68 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 The Strait of Malacca Depth 25 m. Max draft 21 m. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 St Lawrence Seaway • L 225.6 m (740 feet) • B 23.8 m (78 feet) • D 7.9 m (26 feet) • H 35.5 m (116 feet) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Qatar: Q-max • L 345 m (1,132 ft) • B 53.8 m (177 ft) • H 34.7 m (114 ft) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Bulk / Quantity Measurements and Other Challenges
    Liquid Bulk / Quantity Measurements and other challenges Prepared by Jorge Pecci, SafeWaters UM Disclaimer: AIMU is committed to advancing the educational, governmental, regulatory and technical interests of the ocean marine insurance industry. One of the services AIMU provides for its members is the provision of education and publishing of information for use by underwriters, loss control and claims specialists, and other interested parties. Volunteer members of a committee and/or staff of AIMU have produced this information. Committee members abide by antitrust restrictions and all other applicable laws and regulations while compiling information. It is generally not possible to treat any one subject in an exhaustive manner, nor is it AIMU’s intent to do so. No representations or warranties are made regarding the thoroughness or accuracy of the information. Introduction: Quantity of crude oil or petroleum product(s) loaded, assessed by measurements done ashore at the terminal and afterwards shippers enter these figures in the bill of lading. On the other hand ship’s figures ascertained on board by way of measurement of ship’s tanks and concomitant calculations done by especially appointed surveyor together with responsible for cargo operations ship’s officer, normally Chief Mate. These figures obtained ashore and on board of tanker, as a rule, differ from each other. There are many factors contributing to these discrepancies such as superseded tables used by the terminal in the calculation of Bill of Lading quantities, inaccurate vessel experience factor, Cargo Custody transfer practices and the competency of Cargo Inspectors and crew. These discrepancies product of errors in calculation eventually evolve in what is normally called in insurance “paper loss”.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results
    Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results January 15, 2019 AIR RESOURCES BOARD 1 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels Contents 1. Summary and Background...................................................................................... 5 2. Ocean-Going Vessel Background and Description ................................................. 6 2.1. Ocean-Going Vessel Marine Engines and Operations ................................ 9 2.2. Geographical Areas..................................................................................... 9 3. General Emissions Inventory Methodology and Sources...................................... 12 3.1. Base Year Vessel Visits and Time At Berth............................................... 13 3.2. Vessel Visit Length .................................................................................... 15 3.3. Effective Power (EP) ................................................................................. 19 3.4. Emission Factors (EF) ............................................................................... 22 4. Future Year Forecasts........................................................................................... 22 4.1. Freight Analysis Framework ...................................................................... 23 4.2. Mercator Forecast for Ports of LA/LB ........................................................ 27 4.3. Engine Tier Availability and Introduction...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives for Replacing Enbridge's Dual Line 5 Pipelines Crossing The
    Report to the State of Michigan Alternatives for replacing Enbridge’s dual Line 5 pipelines crossing the Straits of Mackinac June 15, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 The Purpose of This Report 1 Summary of Key Conclusions 1 Summary Comparison of the Two Feasible Alternatives 5 Reporting Parameters and Process 6 How Enbridge Defines Feasibility in the Context of This Report 6 How Enbridge Prepared This Report 6 Consultants for the Three Alternatives Feasibility Assessments 7 Enbridge’s Line 5 in Michigan 8 Alternative: Tunnel 10 Highlights of the Tunnel Alternative 10 Overview of Underwater Tunnels 11 Tunnel planning and design 11 Tunnel construction 12 Tunnel lining 13 Pipe installation 13 Tunnel access 14 Summary of Feasibility Study for a Line 5 Tunnel under the Straits 16 Tunnel consultants 16 Tunnel feasibility 16 Tunnel configuration options 17 Straits tunnel specifications 18 Geological considerations 19 Tunnel depth 20 Tunnel diameter and lining 21 Placing other utilities in the tunnel 22 TBM type 22 Approximate construction sequence 23 TBM launch and reception 23 Spoil handling and disposal 24 Pipeline installation 24 Independent Assessment of Hatch’s Tunnel Feasibility Study 25 Construction Cost Estimate 25 Project Execution Schedule 25 Tunnel Permits and Approvals 25 Tunnel Risk Assessment 26 Geologic hazards 26 Report to the State of Michigan—Alternatives for replacing Enbridge’s dual Line 5 pipelines crossing the Straits of Mackinac Alternative: Open Cut With Secondary Containment 28 Highlights of the ‘Open Cut with
    [Show full text]
  • New Trends in Maritime Transportation and Port Activity
    V.E. Chapapría, Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., Vol. 1, No. 4 (2017) 624–632 NEW TRENDS IN MARITIME TRANSPORTATION AND PORT ACTIVITY VICENT ESTEBAN CHAPAPRÍA Ports and Coastal Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain ABSTRACT The role of ports has changed and has become more complex. Ports play a relevant role in global economy. They connect modes of transport and usually they are the leaders in the logistics chain. New works in Suez Canal were in progress until August 2015. The expansion of the Panama Canal will finish this year. These new operational conditions allow for an improvement of international maritime transportation. The Suez Canal Corridor Area Project is a mega project in Egypt that was officially launched in August 2014. The project’s aim is to increase the role of the Suez Canal region in international trading and to develop the three canal cities: Suez, Ismaïlia and Port Said. The importance of these actions changes in the new port cities and new trends and conditions in maritime transportation are discussed. Keywords: maritime transportation, Panama Canal expansion project, ports, port cities, Suez Canal. 1 INTRODUCTION The role of ports has changed and has become much more complex over time. Today, ports must be analysed on the basis of their role in the logistics or supply chains of which they form a part. The port must offer connectivity between the modes of transport in an environmen- tally integrated and respectful way (co-modality). Ports must provide infrastructure, facilities and handling equipment. Moreover, they must bridge the gap between modes of transport in terms of frequency, capacity and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Shipping Terms
    SHIPPING TERMS glossary glossary of shipping terms A term from Latin meaning, “according to AD VALOREM value.” Import duty applied as a percentage of a the cargo’s dutiable value. A contract term requiring that the vessel not rest ALWAYS AFLOAT A representative of a government commission on the ground. In some ports the ship is aground (AA) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW when approaching or at berth. or agency vested with power to administer oaths, examine witnesses, take testimony, and conduct hearings of cases submitted to, or A proceeding wherein a shipper/consignee ABANDON initiated by, that agency. Also called Hearing seeks authority to abandon all or parts of their Examiner. cargo. To move cargo up line to a vessel leaving ADVANCE A discount allowed for damage or overcharge ABATEMENT sooner than the one booked. See also Roll. in the payment of a bill. Transportation charge advanced by one carrier ADVANCE CHARGE Referring to cargo being put, or laden, onto a ABROAD to another to be collected by the later carrier means of conveyance. from the consignor or consignee. Any vessel entering United States waters from a Carrier assumes the charges of another without ABSORPTION ADVANCED NOTICE OF any increase in charges to the shipper. foreign port is required to give a 96–hour ANOV. ARRIVAL (ANOA) Any vessel of 300 gross registered tonnage and greater is required to give the ANOA to the Charges that are applied to the base tariff rate ACCESSORIAL CHARGES U.S. Coast Guard’s National Vessel Movement or base contract rate, e.g., bunkers, container, Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Southeastern Gateway
    EUROPE’S SOUTHEASTERN GATEWAY: RESPONDING TO RAPIDLY CHANGING PATTERNS OF WORLD SHIPPING. Abstract World trade and transportation are changing THE UNIVERSITY’S ROLE dramatically. Energy prices and transport sustainability concerns are reinvigorating ocean freighter shipping. An ever-increasing portion of trade is in containers, and container ships are Roger E. HAMLIN getting larger quickly. Many ports, nations and continents are not keeping up with ship size Dan T. LAZĂR increases putting them at a trade disadvantage. Major canals and seaways must also upgrade or be rendered obsolete, causing a change in the Roger E. HAMLIN pattern of world trade. Ports have to do more than expand vessel size Professor, Urban and Regional Planning Faculty, School of limits. Port regions must also invest in infrastructure Planning, Design and Construction, Michigan State University, that improves multi-modal access to the port and East Lansing, MI, United States of America augments hand-off of containers to smaller seaway Tel.: 001-517-353.8743 ships, trains and trucks. With heightened security E-mail: [email protected] and evolving emphasis on flexible and efficient logistics, ports must become high-tech logistics Dan T. LAZĂR hubs with improved real-time data about port Associate Professor, Public Administration Department, Faculty throughput. of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Constanţa, Romania provides an example of Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania an attempt to respond to this rapid change. Near Tel.: 0040-264-431.505 the Danube Delta, on the Black Sea, Constanţa offers a potential southeastern gateway to Europe E-mail: [email protected] for the Black Sea, the Eastern Mediterranean and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tukan: Product Range
    TUKAN 750 / 1500 / 3000 PRODUCT RANGE TUKAN THE TUKAN: PRODUCT RANGE. PRODUCT RANGE Cranes of the TUKAN series are multi- Hook 4-rope multi- 2-blade motor- purpose cranes suitable for handling beam blade grab driven grab bulk goods with all types of grabs, for general cargo handling using load hooks and special load attachment equipment such as e.g. coil or slab tongs, magnets Load magnet Telescopic Rotator and for container handling by means of spreader spreaders. Typical of the Tukan crane design is the large-diameter tubular column and the large roller bearing used for the slewing ring. O Load attachment equipment (examples) O The Tukan from Ardelt in the port of Isdemir/Turkey Page 2 TUKAN THE TUKAN: PRODUCT RANGE. Tukan 750 The Tukan 750 is designed chiefly for the handling of goods in inland ports. With an outreach of 27 m, and with the normal gantry gauge of 10 m and a distance of approx. 2.5 m between waterside rail and fender, it is capable of loading and unloading without problem all ships that operate on inland waterways. It is also possible to serve sea-going vessels up to Handymax size in an efficient manner. As standard, the Tukan 750 is equipped with a container stage allowing container ships of the 1st generation with up to 8 rows (19.2 m) to be served. Tukan 1500 The Tukan 1500 is a crane built for sea ports. It is optionally equipped with jib systems that allow a max. outreach of 32, 35, 40 or 45 m to be attained.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshima Shipbuilding Company
    CENTER ON JAPANESE ECONOMY AND BUSINESS Occasional Paper Series January 2015, No. 69 Oshima Shipbuilding Company Hugh Patrick This paper is available online at www.gsb.columbia.edu/cjeb/research COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK January 7, 2015 Oshima Shipbuilding Company Hugh Patrick Center on Japanese Economy and Business Columbia Business School Abstract Oshima Shipbuilding is one of many mid‐size Japanese companies that are major global players in niche markets. This essay tells the Oshima story in the context of the global shipbuilding industry’s cycles, changing competitors, and evolving technologies. The industry is subject to wide, rapid swings in demand and pricing, primarily for exogenous reasons. Oshima, a builder of mid‐size bulk carriers, has survived, and even prospered, through productivity growth, technological innovation, and earning a reputation for quality. Oshima Shipbuilding Company Hugh Patrick Many mid‐size Japanese companies are major global players in niche markets. This essay is about one such firm. It is a company whose plans have routinely been overwhelmed by events, at times tossing it about like a ship in a major storm. Yet it has not just survived, it has come to prosper – though always precariously in an industry as turbulent as the seas its products sail. The Oshima Shipbuilding Company, Ltd, describes itself as “a small‐scale but world‐class shipbuilder.” It builds bulk carriers, which are ships that carry loose, usually homogeneous cargo that is often loaded with the help of gravity. There are many types, some highly specialized, transporting coal, ore, grain, caustic soda, and the like, as well as rolls of paper and steel pipes.
    [Show full text]