DOCSLIB.ORG

Bfn Skripten 390): 75-106 + Anhang

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bfn Skripten 390): 75-106 + Anhang Hans Dieter Knapp und Ralf Grunewald Die Insel Vilm Naturschutzgebiet im Biosphärenreservat Südost-Rügen Kulturgeschichte und Naturerbe BfN-Skripten 488 2018 Die Insel Vilm Naturschutzgebiet im Biosphärenreservat Südost-Rügen Kulturgeschichte und Naturerbe Hans Dieter Knapp Ralf Grunewald Mit Beiträgen von Uwe de Bruyn, Thoralf Grospitz, Eva Hacker, Florian Herzig, Lebrecht Jeschke, Heike Markus, Christine Paulus und Oliver Thassler Titelbild: Luftbild der Insel Vilm (Aufn. Interflug, Mai 1990); Gestaltung: K. Pintz Adressen der Autoren: Prof. Dr. Hans D. Knapp Dorfstr. 37, 18581 Kasnevitz E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. Ralf Grunewald Bundesamt für Naturschutz INA Insel Vilm 18581 Putbus E-Mail: [email protected] Diese Veröffentlichung wird aufgenommen in die Literaturdatenbank „DNL-online“ (www.dnl-online.de). BfN-Skripten sind nicht im Buchhandel erhältlich. Eine pdf-Version dieser Ausgabe kann unter http://www.bfn.de/0502_skripten.html heruntergeladen werden. Institutioneller Herausgeber: Bundesamt für Naturschutz Konstantinstr. 110 53179 Bonn URL: www.bfn.de Der institutionelle Herausgeber übernimmt keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit, die Genauigkeit und Vollstän- digkeit der Angaben sowie für die Beachtung privater Rechte Dritter. Die in den Beiträgen geäußerten An- sichten und Meinungen müssen nicht mit denen des institutionellen Herausgebers übereinstimmen. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des institutionellen Herausgebers unzu- lässig und strafbar. Nachdruck, auch in Auszügen, nur mit Genehmigung des BfN. Druck: Druckerei des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB) Gedruckt auf 100% Altpapier ISBN 978-3-89624-225-9 DOI 10.19217/skr488 Bonn - Bad Godesberg 2018 Inhaltsverzeichnis Inhaltsverzeichnis ............................................................................................................. 3 Vorwort: Die „Urwaldinsel Vilm“ – Mythos und Wirklichkeit ....................................... 7 1 „Urwaldinsel“ mit Kulturgeschichte ............................................................ 11 2 Kulturgeschichte ........................................................................................... 21 2.1 Frühe Geschichte............................................................................................ 22 2.2 Mittelalterlicher Kapellenort ............................................................................. 24 2.3 Waldnutzung und Landwirtschaft .................................................................... 27 2.4 Malerinsel und Ausflugsziel ............................................................................. 30 2.5 Segelsport-Trainingsstätte und Streitobjekt ..................................................... 35 2.6 Gästeheim der DDR-Regierung ...................................................................... 37 2.7 Internationale Naturschutzakademie und Außenstelle Insel Vilm des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz ......................................................................... 38 2.8 Naturschutzgebiet und Biosphärenreservat..................................................... 39 2.9 Historische Karten und Flurnamen .................................................................. 42 2.9.1 Historische Karten ........................................................................................... 42 2.9.2 Flurnamensforschung ..................................................................................... 45 2.9.3 Flurnamen der Insel Vilm ................................................................................ 46 3 Landschaft im Rügischen Bodden .............................................................. 63 3.1 Vorgeschichtliche Entwicklung der Landschaft ................................................ 64 3.2 Die historische Landschaftsentwicklung .......................................................... 66 4 Pflanzenwelt (Flora) ...................................................................................... 71 4.2 Einleitung ........................................................................................................ 73 4.3 Gefäßpflanzen (Pteridophyta und Spermatophyta) ......................................... 75 4.4 Moose (Bryophyta) (vgl. Artenliste 2 im Anhang 1) ......................................... 76 4.4.1 Einleitung ........................................................................................................ 76 4.4.2 Das Auftreten der Moosarten in den unterschiedlichen Vegetations- komplexen ...................................................................................................... 77 4.4.3 Auswertung aus den Erhebungen der Substrattypenzugehörigkeit ................. 80 4.4.4 Nachtrag durch die Herausgeber .................................................................... 83 4.5 Flechten (Lichenophyta) (siehe Artenliste 3 im Anhang 1) .............................. 83 4. 5.1 Einleitung ........................................................................................................ 83 4.5.2 Methodik ......................................................................................................... 84 4.5.3 Ergebnisse ...................................................................................................... 85 4.5.4 Literaturvergleich ............................................................................................ 87 4.5.5 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................... 88 3 5 Pflanzendecke (Vegetation) .......................................................................... 89 5.1 Einführung ....................................................................................................... 90 5.2 Vegetation auf pleistozänem Substrat (Inselkerne) ......................................... 90 5.3 Vegetation auf holozänen Sanden .................................................................. 93 5.4 Vegetation feuchter bis nasser Standorte ........................................................ 96 5.5 Salzvegetation................................................................................................. 96 5.6 Vegetationskarten ........................................................................................... 98 5.7 Vegetationsdynamik auf der holozänen Nehrung des Mittel-Vilm .................. 105 6 Tierwelt (Fauna) ........................................................................................... 109 6.1 Einleitung ...................................................................................................... 110 6.2 Wirbellose ..................................................................................................... 112 6.2.1 Schnecken und Muscheln (Gastropoda und Bivalvia) (siehe Artenliste 6 im Anhang 2) ................................................................................................. 113 6.2.2 Spinnen- und Krebstiere (Arachnida und Crustacea) (siehe Artenliste 7 im Anhang 2) ..................................................................................................... 117 6.2.3 Insekten (Insecta) .......................................................................................... 120 6.3 Wirbeltiere (Chordata) ................................................................................... 131 6.3.1 Fische (Pisces) (siehe Artenliste 12 im Anhang 2) ........................................ 131 6.3.2 Lurche und Kriechtiere (Amphibia und Reptilia) (siehe Artenliste 13 im Anhang 2) ..................................................................................................... 132 6.3.3 Vögel (Aves) ................................................................................................. 138 6.3.4 Säugetiere (Mammalia) ................................................................................. 152 7 Literaturverzeichnis .................................................................................... 161 Anhänge ...................................................................................................................... 167 I Artenlisten der Flora von Vilm ................................................................... 169 Tabelle 1: Liste der Gefäßpflanzen der Insel Vilm .......................................................... 169 Tabelle 2: Liste der Moose (Bryophyta) der Insel Vilm ................................................... 184 Tabelle 3: Flechten (Lichenes) der Insel Vilm ................................................................ 189 Tabelle 4: Liste der Pilze (Mycobionta) der Insel Vilm .................................................... 194 Tabelle 5: Liste der Großalgen in den Boddengewässern um die Insel Vilm .................. 204 Tabelle 6: Vegetationsaufnahmen (Erstaufnahme O. Abner 1994, bearbeitet und neu gegliedert von O. Thassler 2015) .......................................................... 206 II Artenlisten der Fauna von Vilm .................................................................. 217 Tabelle 7: Liste der terrestrischen Weichtiere (Mollusca) der Insel Vilm (einschließlich Süßwassermuscheln, nach Menzel-Harloff 2001, ergänzt nach weitere Quellen) ................................................................................... 217 Tabelle 8: Liste der Spinnentiere (Archanida) der Insel Vilm .......................................... 220 4 Tabelle
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    ELYTRON, 2002. VOL. 16: 00-00 ISSN: 0214-1353 89 DESCRIPTION O A NEW SPECIES O ATHOUS AND RECORD O THE EMALE O A. AZORICUS PLATIA & GUDENZI ROM THE AZORES (COLEOPTERA: ELATERIDAE)1 Giuseppe Platia Via Molino Vecchio, 21 47030 GATTEO (C). ITALY [email protected] Paulo A. V. Borges Univ.dos Açores, Dep. Ciências Agrárias, CITA-A, 9700-851 ANGRA DO HEROÍSMO. TERCEIRA. AÇORES Unidade de Macroecologia e Conservação (UMC), Univ. de Évora, ábrica dos Leões 7000-730 ÉVORA. PORTUGAL [email protected] ABSTRACT Description of a new species of Athous and record of the female of A. azoricus Platia & Gudenzi from the Azores (Coleoptera: Elateridae) Athous (Orthathous) pomboi n. sp. is described from the Santa Maria Island. It is the second species of this genus known from the Azorean Archipelago. The distinctive characters of the female of A. azoricus are given. Key words: Coleoptera, Elateridae, new species, Athous, Azores. INTRODUCTION The Azores, an archipelago of nine islands located in the North Atlantic, is not particularly rich in endemic beetles and other arthropods when compared with the other Macaronesian archipelagoes of Madeira and Canaries (BORGES, 1992). However, after a recent intensive survey of 15 Natural orest Reserves and other Azorean reserves (BALA «Biodiversity of Arthropods of the Laurisilva of the Azores» 1998-2002, see BORGES et al. 2000) several new arthropod taxa was discovered including some beetles (see BLAS & BORGES, 1999; BORGES et al., 1 This is the article number 11 of the Project BALA (see (http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/IBOY/ europe_ap.html#BALA) 90 G. PLATIA & P.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Today for Nature Tomorrow
    Report Number 693 Knepp Castle Estate baseline ecological survey English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 693 Knepp Castle Estate baseline ecological survey Theresa E. Greenaway Record Centre Survey Unit Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre Woods Mill, Henfield West Sussex RH14 0UE You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Cover note Project officer Dr Keith Kirby, Terrestrial Wildlife Team e-mail [email protected] Contractor(s) Theresa E. Greenaway Record Centre Survey Unit Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre Woods Mill, Henfield West Sussex RH14 0UE The views in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of English Nature This report should be cited as: GREENAWAY, T.E. 2006. Knepp Castle Estate baseline ecological survey. English Nature Research Reports, No. 693. Preface Using grazing animals as a management tool is widespread across the UK. However allowing a mixture of large herbivores to roam freely with minimal intervention and outside the constraints of livestock production systems in order to replicate a more natural, pre- industrial, ecosystem is not as commonplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Checkered Beetles Moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) – Hazardous Phytophags of Arboreal and Shrubby Plants of Botanical Gardens and Plantings of Kiev M
    UDC 632.634.791.937 (477.75) © 2017 Checkered beetles moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) – hazardous phytophags of arboreal and shrubby plants of botanical gardens and plantings of Kiev M. Lisovyi, O. Sylchuk Natsional University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroev Oborony str., 13, Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine P. Chumak, V. Kovalchuk, Botanichny Garden of Acad. O. Fomina The purpose. To carry out probes on revealing and specification of species composition of checkered moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in conditions of botanical gardens and plantings of Kiev. Methods. Standard methods of faunistic research in entomology, population ecology, and protection of plants. Results. It is determined that 24 kinds of checkered moths are eating 54 kinds of plants which are widely used for gardening in Kiev. For the first time the following kinds are revealed: Phyllonorycter issikii, Phyllonorycter platani, and Phyllonorycter emberizaepennella. At calculation of Palii-Kovnatski indexes they specified that in city plantings the dominant phytophags are Cameraria ohridella (94,11%), Phyllonorycter populifoliella (86,37%) and Gracillaria syringella (59,14%). They consider that in formation of the secondary areal of invasion kinds of checkered moths the great value has an areal of spread of the host-plant. Environmental analysis is carried out of checkered moths of family Gracillariidae which is spread in cities of the Europe and which are absent in fauna of cities of Ukraine. That has important theoretical and practical value for ecology, entomology and protection of plants against hazardous checkered moths. Conclusions. All the probed kinds of checkered moths by their trophic specialization may be distributed into polyphages (6 kinds), oligophages (14 kinds) and monophages (3 kinds).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Leaf-Mining Moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx Botanica Sp
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 865: 39–65A new (2019) leaf-mining moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx botanica sp. nov. 39 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.865.34265 MONOGRAPH http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new leaf-mining moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx botanica sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae), feeding on the rare endemic shrub Teucrium parvifolium (Lamiaceae), with a revised checklist of New Zealand Gracillariidae Robert J.B. Hoare1, Brian H. Patrick2, Thomas R. Buckley1,3 1 New Zealand Arthropod Collection (NZAC), Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auc- kland, New Zealand 2 Wildlands Consultants Ltd, PO Box 9276, Tower Junction, Christchurch 8149, New Ze- aland 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand Corresponding author: Robert J.B. Hoare ([email protected]) Academic editor: E. van Nieukerken | Received 4 March 2019 | Accepted 3 May 2019 | Published 22 Jul 2019 http://zoobank.org/C1E51F7F-B5DF-4808-9C80-73A10D5746CD Citation: Hoare RJB, Patrick BH, Buckley TR (2019) A new leaf-mining moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx botanica sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae), feeding on the rare endemic shrub Teucrium parvifolium (Lamiaceae), with a revised checklist of New Zealand Gracillariidae. ZooKeys 965: 39–65. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.865.34265 Abstract Sabulopteryx botanica Hoare & Patrick, sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae) is described as a new species from New Zealand. It is regarded as endemic, and represents the first record of its genus from the southern hemisphere. Though diverging in some morphological features from previously de- scribed species, it is placed in genus Sabulopteryx Triberti, based on wing venation, abdominal characters, male and female genitalia and hostplant choice; this placement is supported by phylogenetic analysis based on the COI mitochondrial gene.
    [Show full text]
  • Euconulus Alderi Gray a Land Snail
    Euconulus alderi, Page 1 Euconulus alderi Gray A land snail State Distribution Photo by Matthew Barthel and Jeffery C. Nekola Best Survey Period Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State listed as Special Concern are smaller, have a more shiny luster, and a darker shell color. Also, the microscopic spiral lines on the base of Global and state ranks: G3Q/S2 the shell are stronger than the radial striations. This is reversed in E. fulvus (Nekola 1998). For more Family: Helicarionidae information on identifying land snails, see Burch and Jung (1988) pages 155-158 or Burch and Pearce (1990) Synonyms: none pages 211-218. Total range: The global range of Euconulus alderi Best survey time: Surveys for E. alderi are best includes Ireland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the performed after rain, when the soil and vegetation are United States. Within the U.S. it has been found in moist. During dry periods, a survey site can appear Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, and completely devoid of snails, while after a rain the same Wisconsin (Frest 1990, NatureServe 2007, Nekola site can be found to contain numerous individuals. 1998). This species was not known from North Temperatures should be warm enough that the ground is America until 1986 when it was discovered in Iowa and not frozen and there is no snow. Dry, hot periods during Wisconsin (Frest 1990, Nekola 1998). mid-summer should be avoided. The best time of day to survey is often in early morning when conditions are State distribution: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Populus Alba) ______
    Issue 22 Newsletter: November 2010 ________________________________________________________________________________________ An unexpected leaf miner on White Poplar (Populus alba) _________________________________________________ On 30th October Martin Gray found a tentiform mine on White Poplar (Populus alba) at Saxilby, near Lincoln, Lincolnshire, VC54. The mine was lower surface, with the frass piled at one end of the mine (right photo) It was obviously a Phyllonorycter species and should have been Phyllonorycter comparella a known leaf miner on this host in the UK. Images © Martin Gray Wisely, Martin decided to open the mine to examine the pupa and was surprised to see that the cremaster had long spines, whereas the Populus Phyllonorycters in Britain (and Europe) have either tiny spines or no spines on the cremaster (as shown overleaf). Page 1 Newsletter of www.leafmines.co.uk: November 2010 Newsletter: November 2010 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Cremaster from P.alba P.comparella cremaster Image © Martin Gray Image© Rob Edmunds . John Langmaid was contacted and thought that the mine was probably Phyllonorycter salictella, as he had bred this species from P.alba previously. This has a cremaster similar to the one Martin found. The pupa is viable and will hopefully be bred out to identify the species. A return visit to the site where this mine was found confirmed the presence of Sallows (Salix caprea) nearby. This finding emphasises the need for caution in identifying Phyllonorycter species on Populus. The moths ideally should be bred out to confirm identity . A new foodplant for Ramphus oxyacanthae _______________________________ He said Yesterday afternoon, whilst walking along a roadside in North Rode, Cheshire SJ8967 I noticed a single mine of Rhamphus oxyacanthae Steve Hind has found Ramphus oxyacanthae on a leaf of Prunus spinosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Beitrag Zur Kenntnis Blattminierender Schmetterlinge (Lepidoptera) Der Südoststeiermark, Österreich
    ©Österr. Ges. f. Entomofaunistik, Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 4 107-113 Wien, Dezember 2003 Beitrag zur Kenntnis blattminierender Schmetterlinge (Lepidoptera) der Südoststeiermark, Österreich Peter Huemer & Siegfried Erlebach* Abstract Contribution to the knowledge of leaf-mining moths (Lepidoptera) from south-eastern Styria, Austria. Seventynine species of leaf-mining microlepidoptera are recorded from Bad Gleichenberg (Styria, Austria). The species inventory includes following new county records: Stigmella lapponica, Stigmella nivenburgensis (Nepticulidae), Caloptilia fidella, Parectopa robiniella (furthermore new for Burgenland), Phyllonorycter issikii, Phyllonorycter robiniella and Phyllonorycter stettinensis (Gracillariidae). Of particular interest is the first record of Phyllonorycter issikii south of the Alps, a species introduced from Japan to Europe and mining leaves of Tùia spp. Keywords: Lepidoptera, leaf-miner, Austria, Styria, faunistic records. Zusammenfassung Neunundsiebzig Arten blattminierende Kleinschmetterlinge werden aus Bad Gleichenberg (Steiermark, Österreich) gemeldet. Die Artenliste inkludiert folgende Neufunde für das Bundesland: Stigmella lapponica, Stigmella nivenburgensis (Nepticulidae), Caloptilia fidella, Parectopa robiniella (zusätzlich neu für das Burgenland), Phyllonorycter issiki, Phyllonorycter robiniella und Phyllonorycter stettinensis (Gracillariidae). Von besonderem Interesse ist der erstmalige Nachweis der aus Japan nach Europa eingeschleppten und in Blättern
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition of Coleoptera Families Associated with Live and Dead Wood in a Large Norway Spruce Plantation in Denmark
    Species composition of Coleoptera families associated with live and dead wood in a large Norway spruce plantation in Denmark Jens Reddersen & Thomas Secher Jensen Reddersen, J. & T.S. Jensen: Species composition of Coleoptera familites as­ sociated with live og dead wood in a large Norway spruce plantation in Den­ mark. Ent. Meddr. 71: 115-128: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2003. ISSN 0013-8851. For decades, the idea of various biotope types hosting unique plant and ani­ mal species associations and thus forming well-delimited species communities have continuously been debated. At any rate, it remains a practical empirical working concept in intensively exploited mosaic landscapes like in Denmark where biotope fragments are distinctly separated by man-made borders. In Denmark, conifer plantations dominated by Norway spruce, Picea abies L. con­ stitute such a well-delimited biotope type - at the same time widely distributed and with an insect fauna only poorly known. In two years, 1980-81, in Gludsted Plantation, Central Jutland, the arthro­ pod fauna was studied in six stands of mature well-tended Norway spruce on poor sandy acidic soils. A variety of sampling methods was employed with a minimum of four white bucket traps and two tray traps on the ground in each stand. In both years in some stands, ground emergence traps were set up as well as vertical series of white buckets in canopies at mean levels 6.6, 10.6 and 13.2 m. Additional sampling comprised vertical sticky trap series in canopies, sweep net sampling in low branches and winter bark search. Ground beetles, sawflies and the aphid-aphidophagous fauna were analysed in previous papers.
    [Show full text]