DOCSLIB.ORG

Reports of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) - EU MAP and Template for National Work Plan (STECF-16-07)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reports of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) - EU MAP and Template for National Work Plan (STECF-16-07) Reports of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) - EU MAP and template for National Work Plan (STECF-16-07) Edited by Christoph Stransky & Cristina Castro Ribeiro This report was reviewed by the STECF during its 51st plenary meeting held from 11 to 15 April 2016 in Brussels, Belgium. Report EUR 27758 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC) Contact information STECF secretariat Address: Maritime Affairs Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra VA, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: 0039 0332 789343 Fax: 0039 0332 789658 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc Legal Notice This publication is a Science and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. JRC 101530 EUR 27758 EN ISBN 978-92-79-56784-1 ISSN 2467-0715 doi:10.2788/154677 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged How to cite this report: Reports of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) – EU MAP and template for National Work Plan (STECF-16-07). 2016. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, EUR 27758 EN, JRC 101530, 141 pp. Abstract Commission Decision of 25 February 2016 setting up a Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, C(2016) 1084, OJ C 74, 26.2.2016, p. 4–10. The Commission may consult the group on any matter relating to marine and fisheries biology, fishing gear technology, fisheries economics, fisheries governance, ecosystem effects of fisheries, aquaculture or similar disciplines. This is the report of the EWG 16-01 meeting held in Hamburg, Germany, from 7 to 11 March 2016, to address the following Terms of Reference given by the Commission: critically assess a draft EU Multi-annual Programme (EU MAP) for Data Collection and to develop templates and formats for National Work Plans under the revised Data Collection Framework (DCF). The report from the EWG has been presented to the STECF Spring plenary for its reviewing and advice. TABLE OF CONTENTS EU MAP and template for National Work Plan (STECF-16-07) .............................................. 2 Expert Working Group EWG-16-01 report ............................................................................... 6 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Terms of Reference for EWG-16-01 ............................................................................ 7 2 Part I: Preparation of future EU MAP .......................................................................... 9 2.1 Biological sampling of fisheries and stocks ................................................................. 9 2.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.2 Chapter I - Definitions ............................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Chapter II – Data requirements .................................................................................. 10 2.1.4 Chapter III – Research surveys at sea ........................................................................ 14 2.1.5 Chapter IV - Thresholds ............................................................................................. 15 2.1.6 RCG agreements ........................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Economic and transversal variables ........................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Chapter I - Definitions ............................................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Chapter II – Data requirements .................................................................................. 18 2.2.3 Chapter IV – Thresholds ............................................................................................ 22 2.2.4 Modification of tables related to transversal and economic data ............................... 22 3 Part II: Preparation of National Work Plan Template ................................................ 25 3.1 General sections ......................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Sampling of marine fisheries ..................................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Modification of tables related to sampling of marine fisheries.................................. 27 3.3 Sampling of anadromous and catadromous species ................................................... 29 3.4 Recreational fisheries ................................................................................................. 30 3.5 Surveys ....................................................................................................................... 33 3.6 Economic and transversal variables ........................................................................... 34 4 References .................................................................................................................. 37 5 CONTACT DETAILS OF STECF MEMBERS AND EWG-16-01 List of Participants ................................................................................................................. 39 6 List of Annexes .......................................................................................................... 48 7 List of Background Documents ................................................................................. 48 8 Annex 1 – Draft EU MAP with “track changes” by the EWG 16-01 ........................ 49 9 Annex 2 – Draft Work Plan Decision with “track changes” by the EWG 16-01 .... 114 SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC COMMITTEE FOR FISHERIES (STECF) EU MAP and template for National Work Plan (STECF-16-07) THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED DURING THE PLENARY MEETING HELD IN Brussels, Belgium, 11-15 April 2016 Request to the STECF STECF is requested to review the report of the STECF Expert Working Group meeting, evaluate the findings and make any appropriate comments and recommendations. Observations of the STECF STECF observes that, according to the terms of reference, the meeting of EWG 16-01 addressed two different tasks: 1. to provide expertise on outstanding issues of the future EU Multi-annual programme; 2. to provide expertise for the preparation of the National Work Plan template. STECF observes that the meeting was organized with a very short notice and the tasks were rather complex to be addressed in only one meeting. However, STECF recognizes that the level of participation was high and covered all the required expertise with the exception of sustainability of aquaculture which, for this reason, was not assessed. EWG 16-01 referred to the DCF workshop on aquaculture (Gydnia, 2015) where the issue of sustainability of aquaculture was discussed. STECF also observes that the legal set up for the future data collection framework is still not completely defined and this increased the time necessary to clarify and address the terms of reference. The revision of the Data Collection Framework (Council regulation (EC) No. 199/2008) is still under negotiation. Therefore, the discussions on EUMAP only reflect the principles reported in the version of the re-cast available at the moment of the meeting. The future EU Multi-annual programme Concerning the preparation of future EU MAP, the EWG 16-01 was required to critically assess if the basic principles of the DCF re-cast and the major recommendations by STECF have been taken into account in the draft EU MAP where deemed necessary. 2 2 STECF notes that the EWG worked on the draft “Commission Decision adopting a multiannual Union programme for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors”, using the “track changes” mode for proposing amendments and provided explanations and comments on those changes in the report of the meeting. STECF observes that the proposed version of EU MAP has been produced in compliance with the basic principles of the DCF re-cast and the previous STECF recommendations, as it contains several suggestions for including the regionalization approach and for establishing sampling plans according to statistical sound principles. STECF notes that the EWG 16-01 amended the list of definitions by deleting the redundant ones, adding the missing ones and changing some of them. In particular, STECF observe that EWG suggested changing the definition of “fishing days” according to the conclusion of the DCF workshop on transversal variables (Cyprus, February 2016). STECF observes that EWG suggested a roadmap for evaluation and updating the list of mandatory surveys. In line with proposals of previous STECF meetings, as well as RCMs in 2015, and not to disrupt current well-established surveys, the EWG agreed that the EU MAP shall contain a basic list of mandatory internationally coordinated surveys, however, this list shall be evaluated against updated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jubilee Field Draft EIA Chapter 4 6 Aug 09.Pdf
    4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides a description of the current environmental and socio- economic situation against which the potential impacts of the Jubilee Field Phase 1 development can be assessed and future changes monitored. The chapter presents an overview of the aspects of the environment relating to the surrounding area in which the Jubilee Field Phase 1 development will take place and which may be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project. This includes the Jubilee Unit Area, the Ghana marine environment at a wider scale and the six districts of the Western Region bordering the marine environment. The Jubilee Unit Area and its regional setting are shown in Figure 4.1. The project area is approximately 132 km west-southwest of the city of Takoradi, 60 km from the nearest shoreline of Ghana, and 75 km from the nearest shoreline of Côte d’Ivoire. Figure 4.1 Project Location and Regional Setting ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT TULLOW GHANA LIMITED 4-1 The baseline description draws on a number of primary and secondary data sources. Primary data sources include recent hydrographic studies undertaken as part of the exploration well drilling programme in the Jubilee field area, as well as an Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) which was commissioned by Tullow and undertaken by TDI Brooks (2008). An electronic copy of the EBS is attached to this EIS. It is noted that information on the offshore distribution and ecology of marine mammals, turtles and offshore pelagic fish is more limited due to limited historic research in offshore areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Biometry and Distribution of the Black Goby Gobius Niger (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Adriatic Sea
    ISSN: 0001-5113 - AADRAY ACTA ADRIAT., 54(2): 265 - 272, 2013 Biometry and distribution of the black goby Gobius niger (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Adriatic Sea Josip BOBAN, Igor ISAJLOVIĆ, Barbara ZORICA*, Vanja ČIKEŠ KEČ and Nedo VRGOČ Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, P. O. Box 500, 21 000 Split, Croatia *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] The results of biometrical analysis of ten morphometric and six meristic characters of Gobius niger were presented in this paper. Total of 301 specimen of G. niger were collected in Croatian territorial waters. Total length of all analysed specimens ranged from 70 mm to 145 mm, with mean 109.90 ± 15.64 mm. Meristic counts of analyzed black goby were D1: V-VII, D2: I+10-14, A: I+7- 12, P: 10-19, C: 14-23, V: 5. Black goby was distributed through the eastern part of Adriatic with three hot spots of population. Key words: Gobius niger, black goby, biometry, distribution, Adriatic Sea INTRODUCTION It feeds mostly on tiny crustaceans, polychaetes and sometimes small fish (JARDAS, 1996). This The black goby Gobius niger (Linnaeus, species morphology and meristics was estab- 1758) is widely distributed across Eastern Atlan- lished through Mediterranean but for Adriatic tic and Mediterranean Sea (include Black Sea), Sea those studies were scarce. The main goal throughout North Africa from Cape Blanc, Mau- of this study was to report the data on the black ritania north and eastwards to the Suez Canal goby morphometric and meristic characteristics and along the eastern Atlantic coast northwards with its distribution in the eastern part of the to Trondheim (Norway) and Baltic Sea (MILLER, Adriatic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the Demersal Fish Fauna in a Baltic Archipelago As Estimated by SCUBA Census
    MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 23: 3143, 1985 Published April 25 Mar. Ecol. hog. Ser. 1 l Spatial and temporal distribution of the demersal fish fauna in a Baltic archipelago as estimated by SCUBA census B.-0. Jansson, G. Aneer & S. Nellbring Asko Laboratory, Institute of Marine Ecology, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT: A quantitative investigation of the demersal fish fauna of a 160 km2 archipelago area in the northern Baltic proper was carried out by SCUBA census technique. Thirty-four stations covering seaweed areas, shallow soft bottoms with seagrass and pond weeds, and deeper, naked soft bottoms down to a depth of 21 m were visited at all seasons. The results are compared with those obtained by traditional gill-net fishing. The dominating species are the gobiids (particularly Pornatoschistus rninutus) which make up 75 % of the total fish fauna but only 8.4 % of the total biomass. Zoarces viviparus, Cottus gobio and Platichtys flesus are common elements, with P. flesus constituting more than half of the biomass. Low abundance of all species except Z. viviparus is found in March-April, gobies having a maximum in September-October and P. flesus in November. Spatially, P. rninutus shows the widest vertical range being about equally distributed between surface and 20 m depth. C. gobio aggregates in the upper 10 m. The Mytilus bottoms and the deeper soft bottoms are the most populated areas. The former is characterized by Gobius niger, Z. viviparus and Pholis gunnellus which use the shelter offered by the numerous boulders and stones. The latter is totally dominated by P.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Highlights
    Monthly Highlights No. 2 / 2021 In this issue As of 2021, the Monthly Highlights include Bulgaria among surveyed countries. According to data collected by EUMOFA from 13 EU Member States, in November 2020 striped venus and whelk together accounted for 12% of the total Contents first-sales value of the “Bivalves and other molluscs and aquatic invertebrates” commodity group. First sales in Europe Striped venus (Italy, Spain) and whelk From 2018 to 2020, the price of live, fresh, or chilled (Belgium, France, Netherlands) mussels imported in the EU from Norway fluctuated from 2,04 to 7,09 EUR/kg. In 2020, both price and Extra-EU imports volume exhibited a downward trend. Weekly average EU import prices of selected products from Over the last four years, German consumers spent selected countries of origin the most for a kilogram of fresh cod, (18,00 EUR/kg on average) compared to France Consumption Fresh cod in Germany, France, and the (16,80 EUR/kg) and the Netherlands (16,30 EUR/kg). Netherlands In 2019, the EU imports of fisheries and aquaculture products from South Africa accounted for over EUR Case studies 295 million and 80.597 tonnes. Hake, squid, and Fisheries and aquaculture in South Africa fishmeal constitute the bulk share of EU imports. Horse mackerel in the EU The largest market for horse mackerel exported by the EU is Egypt. In 2019, exports to the country Global highlights reached 54.000 tonnes, worth EUR 51 million, accounting for 50% of total export volume Macroeconomic context and 47% of value. Marine fuel, consumer prices, and In January 2021, the EU and Greenland concluded exchange rates negotiations for a new four-year Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA), which is the third most important agreement in place for the EU in financial terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Capture-Based Aquaculture of Mullets in Egypt
    109 Capture-based aquaculture of mullets in Egypt Magdy Saleh General Authority for Fish Resources Development Cairo, Egypt E-mail: [email protected] Saleh, M. 2008. Capture-based aquaculture of mullets in Egypt. In A. Lovatelli and P.F. Holthus (eds). Capture-based aquaculture. Global overview. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 508. Rome, FAO. pp. 109–126. SUMMARY The use of wild-caught mullet seed for the annual restocking of inland lakes has been known in Egypt for more than eight decades. The importance of wild seed collection increased with recent aquaculture developments. The positive experience with wild seed collection and high seed production costs has prevented the development of commercial mullet hatcheries. Mullet are considered very important aquaculture fish in Egypt with 156 400 tonnes produced in 2005 representing 29 percent of the national aquaculture production. Current legislation prohibits wild seed fisheries except under the direct supervision of the relevant authorities. In 2005, 69.4 million mullet fry were caught for both aquaculture and culture-based fisheries. A parallel illegal fishery exists, undermining proper management of the resources. The effect of wild seed fisheries on the wild stocks of mullet is not well studied. The negative effect of the activity is a matter of debate between fish farming and capture fisheries communities. Data on the capture of wild mullet fisheries shows no observable effect of fry collection on the catch during the last 25 years. DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIES AND USE IN AQUACULTURE Species presentation Mullets are members of the Order Mugiliformes, Family Mugilidae. Mullets are ray- finned fish found worldwide in coastal temperate and tropical waters and, for some species, also in freshwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Global Assessment of the Status of Exploited Marine Fish and Invertebrate Populations
    A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS June 30 2018 A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS Maria. L.D. Palomares, Rainer Froese, Brittany Derrick, Simon-Luc Nöel, Gordon Tsui Jessika Woroniak Daniel Pauly A report prepared by the Sea Around Us for OCEANA June 30, 2018 A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS Maria L.D. Palomares1, Rainer Froese2, Brittany Derrick1, Simon-Luc Nöel1, Gordon Tsui1, Jessika Woroniak1 and Daniel Pauly1 CITE AS: Palomares MLD, Froese R, Derrick B, Nöel S-L, Tsui G, Woroniak J, Pauly D (2018) A preliminary global assessment of the status of exploited marine fish and invertebrate populations. A report prepared by the Sea Around Us for OCEANA. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, p. 64. 1 Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver BC V6T1Z4 Canada 2 Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research GEOMAR, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Material and Methods 3 − Reconstructed catches vs official catches 3 − Marine Ecoregions vs EEZs 3 − The CMSY method 5 Results and Discussion 7 − Stock summaries reports 9 − Problematic stocks and sources of bias 14 − Stocks in the countries where OCEANA operates 22 − Stock assessments on the Sea Around Us website 31 − The next steps 32 Acknowledgements 33 References 34 Appendices I. List of marine ecoregions by EEZ 37 II. Summaries of number of stock by region and 49 by continent III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Round Goby (Neogobius Melanostomus):A Review of European and North American Literature
    ILLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. CI u/l Natural History Survey cF Library (/4(I) ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY OT TSrX O IJX6V E• The Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus):A Review of European and North American Literature with notes from the Round Goby Conference, Chicago, 1996 Center for Aquatic Ecology J. Ei!en Marsden, Patrice Charlebois', Kirby Wolfe Illinois Natural History Survey and 'Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Lake Michigan Biological Station 400 17th St., Zion IL 60099 David Jude University of Michigan, Great Lakes Research Division 3107 Institute of Science & Technology Ann Arbor MI 48109 and Svetlana Rudnicka Institute of Fisheries Varna, Bulgaria Illinois Natural History Survey Lake Michigan Biological Station 400 17th Sti Zion, Illinois 6 Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 96/10 The Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus): A Review of European and North American Literature with Notes from the Round Goby Conference, Chicago, 1996 J. Ellen Marsden, Patrice Charlebois1, Kirby Wolfe Illinois Natural History Survey and 'Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Lake Michigan Biological Station 400 17th St., Zion IL 60099 David Jude University of Michigan, Great Lakes Research Division 3107 Institute of Science & Technology Ann Arbor MI 48109 and Svetlana Rudnicka Institute of Fisheries Varna, Bulgaria The Round Goby Conference, held on Feb. 21-22, 1996, was sponsored by the Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Program, and organized by the
    [Show full text]
  • I CHARACTERIZATION of the STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) in SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE of FISHERS and ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
    i CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE OF FISHERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science ________________________________________________________________________ By Charlotte Marin 2018 ii APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science ________________________________________ Charlotte A. Marin Approved: 2018 ________________________________________ S. Gregory Tolley, Ph.D. Committee Chair ________________________________________ Richard Cody, Ph.D. ________________________________________ Edwin M. Everham III, Ph.D. The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to dedicate this project to Harvey and Kathryn Klinger, my loving grandparents, to whom I can attribute my love of fishing and passion for the environment. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my mom, Kathy, for providing a solid educational foundation that has prepared me to reach this milestone and inspired me to continuously learn. I would also like to thank my aunt, Deb, for always supporting my career aspirations and encouraging me to follow my dreams. I would like to thank my in-laws, Carlos and Dora, for their enthusiasm and generosity in babysitting hours and for always wishing the best for me. To my son, Leo, the light of my life, who inspires me every day to keep learning and growing, to set the best example for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Ecology and Culture of Grey Mullet (Mugilidae)
    CHAPTER 18 Stock Enhancement of Mugilidae in Hawaii (USA) Kenneth M. Leber,1,* Cheng-Sheng Lee,2 Nathan P. Brennan,1 Steve M. Arce,2 Clyde S. Tamaru,3 H. Lee Blankenship4 and Robert T. Nishimoto5 Introduction Aquaculture-based marine fi sheries enhancements have a long history, dating back to the late 19th century when releasing cultured fry into the marine environment was the principal fi shery management tool. Stocking fi sh eggs and larvae was regarded as the way to save what was generally perceived as a declining resource, the causes of which were not well understood. By the early decades of the 20th century, billions of unmarked, newly-hatched fry had been released into the coastal environments (Radonski and Martin 1986). In the United States, Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglejinus), pollack (Pollachius virens), winter fl ounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) were stocked (Richards and Edwards 1986). No attempt was made to evaluate stocking strategies and success was measured by numbers released rather than numbers surviving. By the early 1930s, after a half century of releases had produced no evidence of an enhancement impact (except for some salmonid stocking programs), stocking programs were largely curtailed in the US and harvest management was established as the principal means to manage marine fi sheries. In the 1980s, some states in the US began new stock enhancement programs, following advances in marine fi sh culture and fi sh tagging technologies. Most of these new programs were established primarily for research on the effi cacy of marine stock enhancement, with a goal of developing more effective stock enhancement strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullets and the Impact of the Environmental Status of Burgas Bay on Their Populations
    Annual of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” Faculty of Biology Book 4 - Scientific Sessions of theFaculty of Biology 2019, volume 104, pp. 62-69 International Scientific Conference “Kliment’s Days”, Sofia 2018 MULLETS AND THE IMPACT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF BURGAS BAY ON THEIR POPULATIONS RADOSLAVA BEKOVA1*, BOGDAN PRODANOV2, TODOR LAMBEV2 1 – Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, Institute of Oceanology–BAS, Varna, Bulgaria 2 - Department of Coastal Zone Dynamics, Institute of Oceanology–BAS, Varna, Bulgaria *Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: environmental assessment, mullets, population parameters, Burgas Bay Abstract: An ecosystem approach has been chosen for an assessment of the status of the populations of three mullet species in Burgas Bay. The complex data requirements for all three species and physicochemical parameters plus sediment are the basis for a comparative assessment of the population status of mullets in Burgas Bay. An assessment of the local anthropogenic impact was also made using hydrochemical analyses. The present study aims to extend and deepen the knowledge of the population- biological characteristics of three species of mullets (Mugil cephalus, Chelon auratus and Chelon saliens) from Burgas Bay by using an ecosystem scale research to determine the degree of contamination with biogenic substances and their impact on the mullet populations. INTRODUCTION Environmental changes due to anthropogenic factors affect all parts of the plant and animal world in inland waters, seas and oceans. The Black Sea is close to the so-called "red line" beyond which ecosystem degradation processes may become irreversible. Commercial fishing is the most unfavorable factor as it directly destroys a significant part of the populations of certain species, which in terms affects all other species that are in strictly specific relationships with the intensely exploited ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Mugil Cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) I. Identity V. Status And Trends a. Biological Features VI. Main Issues b. Images Gallery a. Responsible Aquaculture Practices II. Profile VII. References a. Historical Background a. Related Links b. Main Producer Countries c. Habitat And Biology III. Production a. Production Cycle b. Production Systems c. Diseases And Control Measures IV. Statistics a. Production Statistics b. Market And Trade Identity Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758 [Mugilidae] FAO Names: En - Flathead grey mullet, Fr - Mulet à grosse tête, Es - Pardete Biological features Body cilindrical, robust. Head broad, its width more than width of mouth cleft; adipose eyelid well developed, covering most of pupil; upper lip thin, without papillae, labial teeth of upper jaw small, straight, dense, usually in several rows; mouth cleft ending below posterior nostril. Two dorsal fins; the first with 4 spines; the second with 8-9 soft rays; origin of first dorsal fin nearer to snout tip than to caudal fin base; origin of second dorsal fin at vertical between a quarter and a half along anal fin base. Anal fin with 8 soft finrays. Pectoral fins with 16-19 rays; pectoral axillary about one-third length of fin. Pyloric caeca 2. Scales in leteral series 36-45. Colour back blue/green, flanks and belly pale or silvery; scales on back and flanks usually streaked to form longitudinal stripes; dark pectoral axillary blotch. View FAO FishFinder Species fact sheet Images gallery FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Collecting wild flathead grey mullet fry from the Mediterranean shore of Egypt Mugil cephalus nursery pond, near Port Said, Egypt Catch pond serving two nursery ponds Harvesting flathead grey mullet Profile Historical background Flathead grey mullet has been farmed for centuries in extensive and semi-intensive ponds in many countries.
    [Show full text]