Norwegian Archaeological Review, 2019 ARTICLE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Norwegian Archaeological Review, 2019 ARTICLE Norwegian Archaeological Review, 2019 ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2019.1621366 Food and Cultural Traits in Coastal Northern Finnmark in the 14th–19th Centuries MARKUS FJELLSTRÖM,GUNILLA ERIKSSON,KERSTIN LIDÉN AND ASGEIR SVESTAD In this study, we used stable isotope analysis and radiocarbon dating to study diet, mobility and chronology in two late medieval/historical coastal popula- tions in northern Norway. We have shown that the individuals buried at Kirkegårdsøya date between 1331 and 1953 cal AD and had a homogenous marine diet, whereas the individuals buried at Gullholmen had a more hetero- geneous diet, consisting of both terrestrial and marine proteins and date between 1661 and 1953 cal AD. We have demonstrated that reindeer protein was not an important part of their diet, and also discussed the importance of correcting for the marine reservoir effect in populations with a coastal subsistence. Our inter- pretation is that individuals buried at Kirkegårdsøya primarily belonged to a Coastal Sámi community, although Norwegians with a similar diet (and likely comprising a minor population in the area) cannot be ruled out. The more varied diet and mobility at Gullholmen could, as predicted, indicate that these individuals may have had a more diverse cultural affinity. INTRODUCTION Iron Age. From the Late Middle Ages onwards in Norway, the indigenous Sámi Northern Fennoscandia is, and has been, groups were the Mountain and Sea (or a culturally heterogeneous landscape since it Coastal) Sámi in Finnmark, northernmost was first settled (e.g. Eidlitz 1969,Mulk1995, Norway and the Skolt Sámi in eastern Vorren 1998, Hedman 2003, Hansen and Finnmark and on the Kola Peninsula in Olsen 2004, 2014, Bruun 2007,Svestad2013, Russia (Ruong 1982, p. 30, Fjellström 1986, Bergman et al. 2014, Bergman and Edlund p. 27). Until the late 19th–early 20th century, 2016,Hansen,Liedgrenet al. 2016, Spangen most of them had a nomadic or semi-nomadic 2016,Güntheret al. 2018,Salmiet al. 2018). In lifestyle combining reindeer herding or small- northernmost Scandinavia, indigenous Sámi scale farming with hunting during winter and have co-existed with Norse farmers since the Markus Fjellström, Archaeological Research Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Gunilla Eriksson, Archaeological Research Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Kerstin Lidén, Archaeological Research Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Asgeir Svestad, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Email: [email protected] © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. 2 Markus Fjellström et al. fishing during spring and summer. Goat/ expression should be visible in their diet. sheep, marine fish, mammals and sea birds To identify diet in historic populations were particularly important food resources where written sources are scarce, and for Coastal Sámi. Most of the catch was archaeological material culture not conclu- done during spring and summer at the outfall sive, stable isotope analysis of human ske- of the fjords (Eidlitz 1969,p.23,Fjellström letal remains is a viable approach 1986, p. 31). The hunt of wild reindeer as well (Fjellström 2011,Naumannet al. 2014, as other terrestrial mammals was undertaken Salmi et al. 2015, Bäckström et al. 2017, during fall in the inland. The Skolt Sámi and Lahtinen 2017). the Finnmark Mountain Sámi, by contrast, In this study, we investigate the diet of two had small reindeer herds, which produced coastal Christian burial grounds from dairy products and were used as means of Finnmark in northern Norway: transportation (Vorren and Manker 1976, Kirkegårdsøya and Gullholmen (Fig. 1), in p. 127). Fishing and hunting was also impor- order to visualize their cultural affinities. The tant. Among the Skolt Sámi, for example, study is primarily grounded on human skeletal beaver was hunted both for its fur and fat material recovered from archaeological excava- (Storå 1971, p. 45). Exchange of reindeer tions conducted by Asgeir Svestad within the meat and dried fish was important between project TheTransitiontoChristianSámiBurial Coastal and Mountain Sámi (Fjellström CustomsafterAD1600in 2005–2007 (Svestad 1986, p. 35). Intense reindeer domestication 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2010). Both cemeteries are was not practiced until later historic times registered as Sámi heritage, based on demo- (e.g., Bjørklund 2013). graphic studies in the region, supporting the Because of the different lifestyles of idea of the sites as historic Sámi burial grounds these various groups, their cultural (Svestad 2006,p.3–5). These sites are situated in Fig. 1. Map of northern Fennoscandia with archaeological sites marked (cf. Figures 2–5), the back- ground map, remodelled by the authors, was screenshot from © 2019 Google, Map data: Google, DigitalGlobe. Food and Cultural Traits 3 Sápmi, a Lutheran Protestant area today. Gullholmen, given their Russian Orthodox However, Gullholmen at the border of the affiliation since c. 1550, and the distinctive Varanger peninsula neighbours a Skolt Sámi burial practices on separate burial grounds area with Greek Orthodox traditions (Vorren (cf. Hallström 1922, Storå 1971, Svestad and Manker 1976,p.120).Theestablishmentof 2011, 2013). In order to study this complex- Catholic churches starting in the 13th century ity, we have chosen to focus on food con- andmarketplaceslateroninnorthernNorway, sumption and how carbon, nitrogen and together with the development of cod trade, sulphur isotope analysis on human and ani- suggests a heterogeneous cultural presence, mal skeletal material can contribute to the with indigenous people as well as settlers (Lind understanding of this on a regional, local 2000, 2003,Trædal2008, Hansen and Olsen and individual level. 2014). This is the first extensive study of Sámi From historical records, it is evident that human skeletal material from Norway Coastal Sámi were buried at both cemeteries, employing stable isotope analyses, which will but it is likely that people with other ethnic highlight the cultural diversity among the backgrounds (for example, Norwegians, Sámi and other groups in northern Norway Danes, Finns/Kvaens, Russians) were buried during late medieval/historical times. there to some degree as well (Sivertsen 1973, Pedersen 1984, Svestad 2006). Graves at both cemeteries were marked only by wooden MATERIAL crosses and no grave goods were deposited. KIRKEGÅRDSØYA For Kirkegårdsøya, the written sources are limited, and there is a need to establish the Kirkegårdsøya is a Sámi Christian burial site duration of the use of the cemetery. situated on an island with the same name in Radiocarbon dates exist but could be affected Hammerfest municipality, Finnmark, north- by a marine reservoir effect. For Gullholmen, ern Norway. The island was 450 m long and the historical records are richer, but it is still 200 m wide, situated at the inlet of unclear to what extent the two sites overlap Rypefjord, but is now altered and connected chronologically. It is also unclear whether with the mainland due to industrial develop- those buried at Gullholmen were local or ment since the early 21st century. The cem- not. To get a better grip of the lifestyle of etery is placed on a small isthmus on the those interred at both sites, it is also impor- middle of the island, 0–5 m a.s.l. There is tant to address changes during the lifetime of no evidence for a church on the island, there individuals, their so-called life history. are however several churches in Hammerfest Coastal and Skolt Sámi economies were that can be connected to the burial site predominantly based on marine resources, (Sivertsen 1973). The cemetery has tradition- which is consistent with local/regional land- ally been dated to the 18th century and has scape use and food traditions in northern been said to be used for people dying from Finnmark (Storå 1971, Vorren and Manker illnesses and executions. In addition, 1976, p. 127, Fjellström 1986, p. 31, p. 68). German soldiers from the Second World Accordingly, a marine diet would be War were allegedly buried here. expected for individuals buried on both Archaeological investigations conducted sites, which are located within an area with in 2005 and 2006 have shown that the cem- various Sámi and non-Sámi traditions, dis- etery comprises at least 150 burials, of which playing a heterogeneous cultural landscape. only four ordinary graves and one secondary However, it is unlikely that Skolt Sámi were common grave have been excavated. The buried at the Lutheran cemetery of secondary common grave contains skeletal 4 Markus Fjellström et al. remains from older burials, deposited in con- at the outer coast of Finnmark in 1856. The junction with the construction of new burials churchyard probably originates from the time (Svestad 2006, 2007a). In addition, a sample of the chapel or somewhat earlier related to the was collected from a single grave that was so-called Sámi apostle Thomas von Westen’s not fully excavated. Direct radiocarbon missionary work among the Sámi in the region dates of skeletal remains from the graves in 1718–1719. The cemetery was in use until range from AD 1246–1663 (Table 3). 1868. Although originally believed to be All excavated individuals were analysed a primarily Sámi burial ground, it can also be with regard to stable isotopes: nine samples considered a multi-cultural churchyard, at least of bone and/or teeth from at least six indivi- since the late 18th century. duals, including two males, one female, two Excavations were conducted in 2006 and indeterminate adults and one juvenile, ran- 2007, and included four single graves, one ging from 12 to more than 50 years old.
Recommended publications
  • Tittel: Refraksjonsseismisk Profilering RV94 Hammerfest Juni 2013
    R&P Geo Services AS- Moloveien 4, 1628 Engelsviken Rapport: 13076 Klassifikasjon: Refraksjonsseismikk Tittel: Refraksjonsseismisk profilering RV94 Hammerfest juni 2013 Forfatter: Peter O’Connor , [email protected] Oppdragsgiver: Statens Vegvesen / Nord Kontaktperson oppdragsgiver: Bjørn Tore Olsen, [email protected] Fylke: Finnmark Kommune: Hammerfest Feltarbeide fra - til: Rapportdato : Prosjektnummer : Ansvarlig : 13-15 juni 2013 17 juli 2013 P13076 F. Ruden Sammendrag: Seismisk refraksjonsprofilering ble gjennomført ved RV94 for Statens Vegvesen i forbindelse med oppgradering av RV94 og prosjektering av tunell ved Hammerfest. Formålet med undersøkelsene var å skaffe tilveie informasjon om løsmassemektigheter, løsmassbeskaffenhet samt bergkvalitet ved påhoggene ved Rypefjord og Breilia. Undersøkelsene ble gjennomført ved seismisk refraksjonsprofilering for å bestemme mektigheter og kvalitet av underliggende geologi. Metoden baserer seg på seismisk hastighetsfordeling, og underliggende formasjoner bestemmes da ut fra målte seismiske hastigheter. Ved Rypefjord ble det påvist lag bestående av et øvre tynt torvdekke, organsik jord, grus og sten, deretter oppsprukket fjell 1-5m over kompetent fjell. I Breilia ble det et øvre lag består av 0.5-1.5m torv, organisk jord, grus og sten, deretter 0.2-4.0m med store blokker og oppsprukket fjell over kompetent fjell. Seismisk profilering viser store variasjoner i hastighetsfordelingen som funksjon av orientering. Dette tyder på sterk seismisk anisotropi innen berggrunnen. Dette vises spesielt tydelig ved Rypefjord. Anisotropien kan skyldes foretrukne sprekk-orienteringer. Informasjonen i denne rapporten bør revurderes når informasjon fra fremtidige grunnundersøkelser blir tilgjengelig. Nøkkelord: Seismisk refraksjon, anisotropi Godkjent: F. Ruden, [email protected] AGL13079 Hammerfest Geophysical Survey Report 11 July 2013 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL THE FINDINGS OF THIS REPORT ARE THE RESULT OF A GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY USING NON-INVASIVE SURVEY TECHNIQUES CARRIED OUT AT THE GROUND SURFACE.
    [Show full text]
  • Hefte2.Qxp Layout 1
    Chairmanship Priorities Finnmark Oil platform in the Rypefjord (Hammerfest Municipality) Photo: Bjørn Hansen/Finnmark i bilder On the way to the Arctic View Havøygaveln windmill park, Summer in Finnmark, Torgeir Sæther og Sjur Ness Johanessen on the top of the mountain in Havøysund (Måsøy Municipality) fishing near the island of Ingøya (Måsøy Municipality) Photo: Bjørn Hansen/Finnmark i bilder Photo:Therese Wha The population of Finnmark has been inter- nationally oriented for centuries. When navi- gator Willem Barents discovered the Barents Sea in the end of 16th century, and explorer Roald Amundsen set off to the North Pole in the 1920s, they would make a last stop in Finnmark before the final leg of their journey. They stopped in Finnmark not only because it was the last stretch of European mainland, but also because it was already then, inhabited by a population that for generations had accu- mulated Arctic knowhow. Moreover, in the end of 18th century, the thriving trade in the Barents Ragnhild Vassvik, Chair of the Barents region led to the establishment of the two oldest Regional Council and Chair of towns in Finnmark, Vardø and Hammerfest. Finnmark County Council. Finnmark County is the northern- and easternmost county in Norway, a doorway to the shores of both the North Sea (Atlantic Ocean) and the Barents Sea (Arctic Ocean). It also borders the EU and the Russian Federation. Thus, Finnmark has been and will be putting a strong focus on international co-operation in the High North. The whole Barents region has almost 6 million inhabitants and a surface area of 1,75 million square kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT of MARINE RUSSIAN-NORWEGIAN TRADE FACILITIES in NORTHERN NORWAY Prefeasibility Study
    DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE RUSSIAN-NORWEGIAN TRADE FACILITIES IN NORTHERN NORWAY Prefeasibility study Akvaplan-niva AS Report: 4673-01 This page is intentionally left blank Cover page photo: Yenisey – newly built ice-class tanker of Norilsk Nickel in Murmansk port on her way to Dudinka, October 2011. Photo by Bjørn Franzen, Bioforsk Svanhovd. Akvaplan-niva AS Rådgivning og forskning innen miljø og akvakultur Org.nr: NO 937 375 158 MVA Framsenteret, 9296 Tromsø, Norge Tlf: +47 7775 0300, Fax: +47 7775 0301 www.akvaplan.niva.no Report title Development of marine Russian-Norwegian trade facilities in Northern Norway. Prefeasibility study Author(s) Akvaplan-niva report number Alexei Bambulyak, Akvaplan-niva 4673-01 Rune Rautio, Akvaplan-niva Mikhail Grigoriev, Gecon Date 07.03.2012 No. of pages 48 Distribution open Client Client’s reference Norwegian Barents Secretariat Rune Rafaelsen Maritimt Forum Nord SA Tor Husjord Summary This report presents the results of the preliminary evaluations of feasibilities and a potential for development of trade and transport communication between Russia and Norway with focus on possibilities and needs for increased marine infrastructure and harbors in the Northern Norway for transshipment of oil, coal and metals for international markets, and establishment of a hub for trading the goods internationally. This project discusses different aspects of establishing trade port facilities in the Northern Norway which may be of interest and benefit for all stakeholders – Russian, Norwegian and international businesses. Project manager Quality controller __________________________ __________________________ Alexei Bambulyak Salve Dahle © 2012 Akvaplan-niva AS & Clients. This report may only be copied as a whole. Copying of part of this report (sections of text, illustrations, tables, conclusions, etc.) and/or reproduction in other ways, is only permitted with written consent from Akvaplan-niva AS and Clients.
    [Show full text]
  • NORWAY NORTH SEA HERRING Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries Assessments
    Surveillance NORWAY NORTH SEA HERRING Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) DNV Business Assurance Assessment team Hans J. Lassen, Sandhya Chaudhury Fishery client Norges Fiskarlag (Norwegian Fishermen's Association) Assessment Type 1st Surveillance Report Author name Hans J. Lassen, Sandhya Chaudhury Date 12.05.2021 Norway North Sea herring fishery- 1st Surveillance report 12.05.2021 2 Introduction Covid 19 derogation 27.03.2020 The surveillance report timeline is subject to a 6-month extension in accordance with Covid-19 Derogation 27 March 2020 DNV dnv.com Norway North Sea herring fishery- 1st Surveillance report 12.05.2021 3 1 Contents 1 Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 5 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ............................................................................. 5 3 Executive summary ......................................................................................... 7 3.1 The assessment process ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 History of the assessment ......................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Summary of previous assessments ................................................................................ 8 3.2.2 Summary of the second reassessment - 2019
    [Show full text]
  • Reindeer Husbandry and Barents 2030 Impacts of Future Petroleum Development on Reindeer Husbandry in the Barents Region
    Sven Skaltje REINDEER HUSBANDRY AND BARENTS 2030 IMPACTS OF FUTURE PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT ON REINDEER HUSBANDRY IN THE BARENTS REGION A REPORT PREPARED FOR STATOILHYDRO BY THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR REINDEER HUSBANDRY REINDEER HUSBANDRY AND BARENTS 2030 1 This work is linked to the framework of the International Polar Year as part of the International Polar Year (IPY) con- sortium EALÁT (IPY Project #399): Climate change and reindeer husbandry. This report and implementation of the recommendations included herein are seen as a further contribution to the legacy of the IPY. Layout: UNEP/GRID-Arendal Printing: Fagtrykk Idé AS, Alta, Norway Disclaimer I The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organisa- tions concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Disclaimer II This report has been commissioned by StatoilHydro ASA and un- dertaken by the International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry. Sta- toilHydro ASA has commissioned four parallel scenario reports for the Barents Region on respectively climate change, socio-econom- ic consequences, environmental issues and reindeer husbandry. The joint project was initiated as part of StatoilHydro’s preparations for a strategic action plan for future oil and gas developments in the High
    [Show full text]
  • Stokke. 2014. Adaptation to SLR in Spatial Planning.Pdf
    Ocean & Coastal Management 94 (2014) 66e73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean & Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman Adaptation to sea level rise in spatial planning e Experiences from coastal towns in Norway Knut Bjørn Stokke* Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning, 1430 Aas, Akershus, Norway article info abstract Article history: Rising sea level has become a spatial planning challenge in Norway, as in many other coastal countries. Available online 18 December 2013 This article focuses on how some selected Norwegian coastal towns adapt to this challenge in their spatial planning, and identifies potential barriers and opportunities for adaptation. Hammerfest in northern Norway is of particular interest since it is one of the few municipalities in Norway that ad- dresses the future rise in sea level in its current municipal master plan. The main conclusion is that although sea level rise has scarcely been acknowledged as a challenge to spatial planning, there is increasing awareness and knowledge of the issues and impacts it presents. An important barrier to adaptation is the lack of authoritative signals from the national government. In Hammerfest there are enthusiasts in the municipal administration, and their ability to build networks with other relevant parties e including both the Planning Section in the municipality and other actors outside the munici- pality e which is a major reason for the consideration of sea level rise being integrated into the master plan. Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction climate variability and climate change, and includes changes in actions, resources and technology (Brooks and Adger, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Merknadsbehandling Rv
    Merknadsbehandling Rv. 94 Utredning av omkjøringsalternativer Hammerfest kommune Region nord Bodø, R.vegktr Plan og prosjektering Dato:Mai 2011 Forslag til kommunedelplan for rv. 94 utredning av omkjøringsveger, Hammerfest kommune INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE 1.0 GENERELT OM MERKNADSBEHANDLINGEN ....................................................................... 2 1.1 Annonsering, høring, frister og høringsinstanser ........................................................................ 2 1.2 Generelt om merknadsbehandlingen .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 FOLKEMØTE OG ÅPEN KONTORDAG .................................................................................... 4 2.1 Folkemøte ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Åpen kontordag på servicetorget ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 MERKNADSBEHANDLING ........................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Fylkesmannen i Finnmark – 1. høring og offentlig ettersyn ........................................................ 5 3.2 Fylkesmann i Finnmark – 2. høring og offentlig ettersyn ............................................................ 6 3.3 Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat (NVE) – 1. høring og offentlig ettersyn ......................... 7 3.4 Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat (NVE) – 2. høring
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunedelplan for Hammerfest Og Rypefjord 2014-2025 Vedtatt I Hammerfest Kommunestyre 19.06.2014
    Kommunedelplan for Hammerfest og Rypefjord 2014-2025 Vedtatt i Hammerfest kommunestyre 19.06.2014 Planbeskrivelsens vedlegg Kommunedelplan for Hammerfest og Rypefjord 2014-2025 - PLANBESKRIVELSENS VEDLEGG 1-3 INNHOLD VEDLEGG 1: KONSEKVENSUTREDNING ............................................... 5 1. METODE OG DATAGRUNNLAG ................................................ 6 1.1 Konsekvensutredningens hensikt................................................ 6 1.2 Metode .................................................................................. 6 1.3 Datagrunnlag .......................................................................... 6 2. KONSEKVENSER TILKNYTTET ENKELTOMRÅDER .................... 9 2.1 Oppbygging av utredningen ...................................................... 9 2.2 Områder som er tatt inn i planforslaget ...................................... 10 2.3 Områder som er vurdert, men forkastet ..................................... 55 3. SAMLEDE KONSEKVENSER – PR AREALFORMÅL.................... 59 3.1 Struktur på vurderingen .......................................................... 59 3.2 Boligbebyggelse ..................................................................... 59 3.3 Sentrumsformål/kjøpesenter/forretninger ................................... 59 3.4 Offentlig og privat tjenesteyting ................................................ 59 3.5 Fritids- og turistformål ............................................................ 60 3.6 Råstoffutvinning ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM Yearbook 2014 Yearbook 2014
    ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM ARCTIC BUSINESS www.arcticbusinessforum.com FORUM Yearbook 2014 Yearbook 2014 Publisher: Lapland Chamber of Commerce ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM YEARBOOK 2014 March 2014 Compiled and edited by Timo Rautajoki © Lapland Chamber of Commerce, 2014 3 ARCTIC SEA Airport Harbour Lakselv Railway Andenes Narvik Svolvaer Leknes Pajala Bodø Gällivare Mo I Rana Arvidsjaur Mosjøen Brønnøysund AND FINL NORWAY SWEDEN 4 ARCTIC SEA BARENBARENTSTS RUSSRUSSIAIA 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD ....................................................8 2. ARCTIC COUNCIL, ARCTIC POLICIES AND ARCTIC BUSINESS .........10 2.1 Arctic Council. 10 2.2 Arctic Economic Council ..................................17 2.3 Report from World Economic Forum: “Demystifying the Arctic” ..................................25 2.4 USA and Alaska. 29 2.5 Crisis in Ukraine and the Arctic .............................38 3. NORTH OF FINLAND ............................................40 3.1 LAPLAND .............................................41 3.1.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ............................63 3.1.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 ......................65 3.1.2.1 Investments expected to start first. 69 3.1.2.2 Investments waiting for better times .........................70 3.1.2.3 Key investment project of Lapland . .72 3.2 Oulu REGION .........................................74 3.2.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ............................86 3.2.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 ......................91 3.2.2.1 Investments expected to start first. 93 3.2.2.2 Investments waiting for better times .........................93 3.2.2.3 Key investment project of Oulu Region. 95 3.3 KAINUU REGION .......................................96 3.3.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ...........................100 3.3.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 .....................101 3.3.2.1 Investments expected to start first.
    [Show full text]
  • Snøhvit and Saami Reindeer Husbandry Outlook, Impacts and Mitigation
    NINA Norsk institutt for naturforskning Snøhvit and Saami reindeer husbandry outlook, impacts and mitigation Snøhvit og samisk reindrift – Framtidsutsikter, konsekvenser og avbøtende tiltak Prepared upon request from STATOIL C. Nellemann I. Vistnes H. Ahlenius L. Kullerud E. Lieng T. Olsen B. Johansen NINA Oppdragsmelding 765 NINA Norsk institutt for naturforskning Snøhvit and Saami reindeer husbandry outlook, impacts and mitigation Snøhvit og samisk reindrift – Framtidsutsikter, konsekvenser og avbøtende tiltak Prepared upon request from STATOIL C. Nellemann I. Vistnes H. Ahlenius L. Kullerud E. Lieng T. Olsen B. Johansen Norwegian Institute for Nature Research in collaboration with: Agricultural University of Norway UNEP GRID-Arendal State Mapping Agency (Statens kartverk) NORUT Informasjonsteknologi nina oppdragsmelding 765 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Nellemann, C., Vistnes, I., Ahlenius, H., Kullerud, L, Lieng, E., (NINA) issue the following publications: Olsen, T. & Johansen, B. 2002. Snøhvit and Saami reindeer hus- bandry outlook, impacts and mitigation. Snøhvit og samisk rein- NINA Fagrapport (Scientific Reports) drift – Framtidsutsikter, konsekvenser og avbøtende tiltak - NINA This series present the results of NINAs own research work, Oppdragsmelding 765. 28 pp. overviews of problems, existing knowledge within a topic, lite- rature reviews and material gathered from outside sources. The reports are issued as an alternative or a supplement to Trondheim, desember 2002 international publication when timing, the nature of the mate- rial or the sector targeted, call for it. ISSN 0802-4103 ISBN 82-426-1354-0 NINA Oppdragsmelding (Assignment Report) This is the minimum report supplied by NINA when external Copyright ©: research or investigative assignments have been completed. NINA Norwegian Institute for Nature Research The numbers of copies are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Hele Hammerfest Hele Troms Og Finnmark
    Fylkestingskandidater Kommunestyrekandidater 1 2 3 1 2 3 Ivar B. Prestbakmo Anne Toril Irene Lange Nordahl Lodve Svare Oddvar Linnes Helene Arntzen Salangen Eriksen Balto Sørreisa Forsøl Hammerfest Heggem Karasjok Rypefjord 4 5 6 4 5 6 Fred Johnsen Rikke Hårstad Kurt Wikan Erik Lemika Morten Johansen Alf Magnar Stenersen Tana Bardu Sør-Varanger HELE TROMS HELE Hammerfest Hammerfest Kvalsund 7. Marlene Bråthen; 10. Hugo Salamonsen, 13. Kurt Michalsen, 7. Mona Andersen Gaaseng, 10. Helge Gaaseng, Tromsø Nordkapp Skjervøy Kårhamn Kårhamn 8. Jan Martin Rishaug, 11. Linn-Charlotte Nordahl, 14. Grethe Liv Olaussen, OG FINNMARK HAMMERFEST 8. Ola Schanke Møller, 11. Karin Andersen Berg, Alta Sørreisa Porsanger Hammerfest Rypefjord 9. Karin Eriksen, 12. Klemet Klemetsen, 15. Gunnleif Alfredsen, senterpartiet.no/finnmark senterpartiet.no/hammerfest 9. Hans Nilsen, Kvæfjord Kautokeino Senja Hammerfest VÅR POLITIKK Troms og Finnmark Fullstendig program finner du på Fullstendig program finner du på for hele Hammerfest senterpartiet.no/hammerfest mulighetenes landsdel senterpartiet.no/finnmark BOLYST FOR ALLE! Vi vil jobbe for trivsel og utvikling og ska- Senterpartiet vil: pe et åpent og vennlig Hammerfest med gode oppvekst miljø, • Arbeide for å få opphevet sammenslåingen av Troms og effektive kommunikasjoner og et velfungerende tjenestetil- videregående skoletilbud i kom- idrett- og fritidstilbud til folk i alle Finnmark etter stortingsvalget i 2021. • Utvikle ordninger for kollektiv- og • Styrke folk til folk samarbeid bud. Vi sier et rungende JA til nytt sykehus og ny flyplass og munen aldre og med ulike funksjonsnivå • Videreutvikle et godt, likeverdig og offentlig desentralisert kulturkort til unge. mellom landene i nord. et like klart NEI til bompengefinansiering av Rv.
    [Show full text]
  • Hammerfest Vindpark Konsesjonssøknad Og
    Hammerfest vindpark Konsesjonssøknad og forslag til reguleringsplan Del B – Konsekvensutredning Hammerfest vindpark Konsekvensutredning INNHOLD 1 KONSEKVENSER AV TILTAKET ........................................................................... 7 2 LANDSKAP .............................................................................................................. 9 3 KULTURMINNER OG KULTURMILJØER............................................................. 41 4 NATURMILJØ – BIOLOGISK MANGFOLD ........................................................... 67 5 INNGREPSFRIE NATUROMRÅDER OG VERNEINTERESSER ......................... 95 6 STØY ................................................................................................................... 101 7 SKYGGEKAST OG REFLEKSBLINK .................................................................. 119 8 ISING ................................................................................................................... 131 9 ELEKTROMAGNETISKE FELT OG FORHOLD TIL BEBYGGELSE ................. 135 10 FORURENSING OG AVFALL ............................................................................. 137 11 REINDRIFT .......................................................................................................... 149 12 ANNEN AREALBRUK OG NATURRESSURSER ............................................... 181 13 FRILUFTSLIV OG REISELIV .............................................................................. 183 14 ANDRE SAMFUNNSMESSIGE FORHOLD .......................................................
    [Show full text]