DOCSLIB.ORG

Choosing an Alpha Radiation Weighting Factor for Doses to Non-Human Biota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Choosing an Alpha Radiation Weighting Factor for Doses to Non-Human Biota Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 87 (2006) 1e14 www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvrad Choosing an alpha radiation weighting factor for doses to non-human biota Douglas B. Chambers a,*, Richard V. Osborne b, Amy L. Garva a a SENES Consultants Limited, 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3N4, Canada b Ranasara Consultants Inc., P.O. Box 1116, 7 Pine Point Close, Deep River, Ontario K0J 1P0, Canada Received 19 May 2005; received in revised form 19 October 2005; accepted 25 October 2005 Available online 27 December 2005 Abstract The risk to non-human biota from exposure to ionizing radiation is of current international interest. In calculating radiation doses to humans, it is common to multiply the absorbed dose by a factor to account for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the radiation type. However, there is no international consensus on the appropriate value of such a factor for weighting doses to non-human biota. This paper summarizes our review of the literature on experimentally determined RBEs for internally deposited alpha-emitting radionuclides. The relevancy of each experimental result in selecting a radiation weighting factor for doses from alpha particles in biota was judged on the basis of criteria established a priori. We recommend a nominal alpha radiation weighting factor of 5 for population-relevant deterministic and sto- chastic endpoints, but to reflect the limitations in the experimental data, uncertainty ranges of 1e10 and 1e20 were selected for population-relevant deterministic and stochastic endpoints, respectively. Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Biota; Alpha; Radiation; Deterministic; Stochastic; Relative biological effectiveness; Radiation; Weighting factor 1. Introduction The risks of ionizing radiation to non-human biota (biota) are of considerable current inter- est, and both the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ1 905 764 9380; fax: þ1 905 764 9386. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.B. Chambers). 0265-931X/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.10.009 2 D.B. Chambers et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 87 (2006) 1e14 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), among others, have on-going activities in this area. This paper is based on a report completed for Cogema Resources Inc. (SENES, 2005) to compile and systematically evaluate currently available literature on experimental RBEs and to recommend how these data may best be interpreted to provide a nominal value (or range of values) of (biota) radiation weighting factors that could be used in environmental risk assess- ments. These alpha radiation weighting factors were developed by examining the doseeeffect relationships for a variety of biota in which data were available. We note that a current goal for both international and national agencies (e.g., ICRP) is finalizing a list of reference organisms. Once a list of reference organisms has been agreed upon, further work could be completed on this topic to verify that the alpha radiation weighting factors recommended in this paper are still generally applicable. 1.1. Background Radiation effects on biota depend not only on absorbed dose, but also on the type or ‘‘qual- ity’’ of the radiation. For example, alpha particles and neutrons can produce observable damage at much lower absorbed doses than beta or gamma radiation. Thus, the absorbed dose (in Gy) is multiplied by a modifying factor e alternatively called the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (strictly, the term RBE is reserved for the experimentally observed values but not all adhere to this constraint), quality factor, radiation weighting factor, ecodosimetric weighting factor e in order to account for the relative effectiveness of the different types of radiation (al- pha particles, neutrons, etc.). At present, there is no generally accepted name for this factor in the context of dose to biota. For purposes of brevity and consistency, this paper refers to this factor, derived from experimentally determined values of RBE, as a (biota) radiation weighting factor. Our intention is that such a factor can be applied in an ecological risk assessment involv- ing internally deposited alpha-emitting radionuclides. The concept of RBE is illustrated in the following equation and can be understood as the ‘‘inverse ratio of absorbed doses of different quality radiations, delivered to the same locus of interest, that produce the same degree of a given biological effect in a given organism, organ or tissue’’ all other factors being equal (NCRP, 1967), namely: Dose of reference radiation needed to produce a given effect RBE ¼ ð1Þ Dose of the given radiation needed to produce ðthe same magnitude ofÞ the same biological effect RBE depends on many factors, including the type of cell or tissue irradiated, dose and dose rate, the distribution of Linear Energy Transfer (LET) or linear energy, the effect of interest, and other factors. The concept of RBE is complex and involves many considerations and sources of uncertainty and a full discussion of the factors influencing the use of experimental RBE data for application as (environmental) radiation weighting factors for non-human biota is beyond the scope of this paper. However, a few important issues are briefly noted below. Amongst many other factors, RBE depends on LET, which is the amount of energy absorbed by the target tissue per unit path length. Low LET radiations such as X-rays, gamma rays or electrons of any energy have an average LET of about 3.5 keV/mm (of water) or less (NCRP, 1967, 1990). Gamma rays from 137Cs or 60Co and 250 kVp X-rays have been used as the ‘‘stan- dard’’ or ‘‘reference’’ radiations. It is important to understand, in looking at the literature, that 60Co gamma rays are less effective than 250 kVp X-rays in producing radiobiological effects. At high doses, the difference is small (RBE ¼ 0.86 for 60Co relative to X-ray as the standard); however, the difference is larger at lower doses (ICRU, 1986). For many purposes, the D.B. Chambers et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 87 (2006) 1e14 3 difference in the relative effectiveness of 60Co gamma rays and 250 kVp X-rays can be taken as about a factor of 2 (NCRP, 1990; ICRU, 1986; ICRP, 1989). In many systems, the RBE increases with increasing LET until the LET reaches about 100 keV/mm and then begins to decline. This phenomenon is shown for example in the impair- ment of regenerative capacity of cultured human cells inactivated by monoenergetic particles (Nikjoo et al., 1999). The peaking of the RBE at an LET of about 100 keV/mm occurs for sev- eral complex reasons; however, in general it only requires a few tens of keV of energy to break a single strand of DNA and a single alpha particle with an LET of 100 keV/mm is sufficient to produce a double strand break which is prone to imperfect repair and may result in the death of the cell. Thus at LETs greater than about 100 keV/mm, there is sufficient energy to ensure a dou- ble strand break in target DNA and the breaks induced by the additional energy deposition can- not kill an already terminally damaged cell. The dosimetry of internally deposited alpha emitters remains the source of many questions. Consider for example, the studies shown in Table 1. According to ACRP (2002), some of the results were analyzed on the basis that the alpha-emitting radionuclides were uniformly distrib- uted throughout the organ of interest. However, in the dose ranges reported (0.1e10 mGy), only a few cells would have received very high doses; the vast majority of cells would have received no dose at all. The effect of this inhomogeneity on the dose results in those estimates of the RBE is to bias towards high values. For example, as noted by the ACRP (2002), Samuels (1966) high value of 377 was based on a single data point in a study on cell-killing in mouse oocytes following injection of the alpha source 210Po. An assumption of a uniform distribution gave an alpha dose of only 0.1 mGy to the entire mouse ovary. Samuels himself was skeptical of this result, and recommended an RBE not higher than the values of 50e100. 1.2. Recent evaluations of alpha RBE for non-human biota Over the past decade, a number of authors have reported evaluations of published data on RBE (e.g., ACRP, 2002; DOE, 2002; EC and HC, 2001; Copplestone et al., 2001; UNSCEAR, 1996; FASSET, 2003; NCRP, 1991; Trivedi and Gentner, 2000). Nominal values for an alpha radiation weighting factor from these reviews are summarized in Table 2. In considering these Table 1 Summary of selected studies with alpha RBE values greater than 20 (ACRP, 2002) RBE Author(s) Endpoint Comment 377 Samuels (1966) Cell-killing in mouse oocytes Based on single point; author urged caution, suggested only 50e100 250e360 Jiang et al. (1994) Fetal hemopoetic stem cell Assumed uniform dose distribution. deficit in mice A repeat experiment gave 150 245 Rao et al. (1991) Spermhead abnormalities Assumed uniform dose distribution. in mice Poor statistics 50e100 Brenner et al. (1991) Lens opacification in rats For argon ions. Relevance to survival not clear 65 Brooks et al. (1995) Micronuclei in rat lung Conversion from WLMa to mGy fibroblasts alpha dose was suspect 37e60 Martin et al. (1995) Transformation of Syrian Poor statistics hamster embryo cells a WLM e Working level month. 4 D.B. Chambers et al. / J. Environ. Radioactivity 87 (2006) 1e14 Table 2 Radiation weighting factors for internal alpha radiation for deterministic effects in non-human biota (Relative to low LET radiation) Source Nominal value Comment NCRP (1991) 1 Built-in conservatism in dose model IAEA (1992) 20 Keep same as for humans Barendsen (1992) 2e10 Non-stochastic effect of neutrons and heavy-ions UNSCEAR (1996) 5 Average for deterministic effects Trivedi and Gentner (2000) 10 Deterministic population-relevant endpoints Copplestone et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basics of Radiation Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 1 (June 1, 2018)
    Basics of Radiation Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 1 (June 1, 2018) Before working with radioactive material, it is helpful to recall… Radiation is energy released from a source. • Light is a familiar example of energy traveling some distance from its source. We understand that a light bulb can remain in one place and the light can move toward us to be detected by our eyes. • The Electromagnetic Spectrum is the entire range of wavelengths or frequencies of electromagnetic radiation extending from gamma rays to the longest radio waves and includes visible light. Radioactive materials release energy with enough power to cause ionizations and are on the high end of the electromagnetic spectrum. • Although our bodies cannot sense ionizing radiation, it is helpful to think ionizing radiation behaves similarly to light. o Travels in straight lines with decreasing intensity farther away from the source o May be reflected off certain surfaces (but not all) o Absorbed when interacting with materials You will be using radioactive material that releases energy in the form of ionizing radiation. Knowing about the basics of radiation will help you understand how to work safely with radioactive material. What is “ionizing radiation”? • Ionizing radiation is energy with enough power to remove tightly bound electrons from the orbit of an atom, causing the atom to become charged or ionized. • The charged atoms can damage the internal structures of living cells. The material near the charged atom absorbs the energy causing chemical bonds to break. Are all radioactive materials the same? No, not all radioactive materials are the same.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions
    NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED PART 1 PART 1 Nuclear Terms and Definitions in English APPENDIX 1 NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 2 Non-NATO Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 3 Definitions of Nuclear Forces NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED 1-1 2007 NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED PART 1 NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 1 Source References: AAP-6 : NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions AAP-21 : NATO Glossary of NBC Terms and Definitions CP&MT : NATO-Russia Glossary of Contemporary Political and Military Terms A active decontamination alpha particle A nuclear particle emitted by heavy radionuclides in the process of The employment of chemical, biological or mechanical processes decay. Alpha particles have a range of a few centimetres in air and to remove or neutralise chemical, biological or radioactive will not penetrate clothing or the unbroken skin but inhalation or materials. (AAP-21). ingestion will result in an enduring hazard to health (AAP-21). décontamination active активное обеззараживание particule alpha альфа-частицы active material antimissile system Material, such as plutonium and certain isotopes of uranium, The basic armament of missile defence systems, designed to which is capable of supporting a fission chain reaction (AAP-6). destroy ballistic and cruise missiles and their warheads. It includes See also fissile material. antimissile missiles, launchers, automated detection and matière fissile радиоактивное вещество identification, antimissile missile tracking and guidance, and main command posts with a range of computer and communications acute radiation dose equipment. They can be subdivided into short, medium and long- The total ionising radiation dose received at one time and over a range missile defence systems (CP&MT).
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Basics
    Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV \'- f Susana Field Laboratory .A . &at is radiation? Ra - -.. - -. - - . known as ionizing radiatios bScause it can produce charged.. particles (ions)..- in matter. .-- . 'I" . .. .. .. .- . - .- . -- . .-- - .. What is radioactivity? Radioactivity is produced by the process of radioactive atmi trying to become stable. Radiation is emitted in the process. In the United State! Radioactive radioactivity is measured in units of curies. Smaller fractions of the curie are the millicurie (111,000 curie), the microcurie (111,000,000 curie), and the picocurie (1/1,000,000 microcurie). Particle What is radioactive material? Radioactive material is any material containing unstable atoms that emit radiation. What are the four basic types of ionizing radiation? Aluminum Leadl Paper foil Concrete Adphaparticles-Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons. They can travel only a few centimeters in air and can be stopped easily by a sheet of paper or by the skin's surface. Betaparticles-Beta articles are smaller and lighter than alpha particles and have the mass of a single electron. A high-energy beta particle can travel a few meters in the air. Beta particles can pass through a sheet of paper, but may be stopped by a thin sheet of aluminum foil or glass. Gamma rays-Gamma rays (and x-rays), unlike alpha or beta particles, are waves of pure energy. Gamma radiation is very penetrating and can travel several hundred feet in air. Gamma radiation requires a thick wall of concrete, lead, or steel to stop it. Neutrons-A neutron is an atomic particle that has about one-quarter the weight of an alpha particle.
    [Show full text]
  • MIRD Pamphlet No. 22 - Radiobiology and Dosimetry of Alpha- Particle Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy
    Alpha-Particle Emitter Dosimetry MIRD Pamphlet No. 22 - Radiobiology and Dosimetry of Alpha- Particle Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy George Sgouros1, John C. Roeske2, Michael R. McDevitt3, Stig Palm4, Barry J. Allen5, Darrell R. Fisher6, A. Bertrand Brill7, Hong Song1, Roger W. Howell8, Gamal Akabani9 1Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 2Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood IL 3Medicine and Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 4International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria 5Centre for Experimental Radiation Oncology, St. George Cancer Centre, Kagarah, Australia 6Radioisotopes Program, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland WA 7Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 8Division of Radiation Research, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark NJ 9Food and Drug Administration, Rockville MD In collaboration with the SNM MIRD Committee: Wesley E. Bolch, A Bertrand Brill, Darrell R. Fisher, Roger W. Howell, Ruby F. Meredith, George Sgouros (Chairman), Barry W. Wessels, Pat B. Zanzonico Correspondence and reprint requests to: George Sgouros, Ph.D. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science CRB II 4M61 / 1550 Orleans St Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21231 410 614 0116 (voice); 413 487-3753 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) - 1 - Alpha-Particle Emitter Dosimetry INDEX A B S T R A C T.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Guidelines for Hospital Response to Mass Casualties from a Radiological Incident December 2003
    Interim Guidelines for Hospital Response to Mass Casualties from a Radiological Incident December 2003 Prepared by James M. Smith, Ph.D. Marie A. Spano, M.S. Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health Summary On September 11, 2001, U.S. symbols of economic growth and military prowess were attacked and thousands of innocent lives were lost. These tragic events exposed our nation’s vulnerability to attack and heightened our awareness of potential threats. Further examination of the capabilities of foreign nations indicate that terrorist groups worldwide have access to information on the development of radiological weapons and the potential to acquire the raw materials necessary to build such weapons. The looming threat of attack has highlighted the vital role that public health agencies play in our nation’s response to terrorist incidents. Such agencies are responsible for detecting what agent was used (chemical, biological, radiological), event surveillance, distribution of necessary medical supplies, assistance with emergency medical response, and treatment guidance. In the event of a terrorist attack involving nuclear or radiological agents, it is one of CDC’s missions to insure that our nation is well prepared to respond. In an effort to fulfill this goal, CDC, in collaboration with representatives of local and state health and radiation protection departments and many medical and radiological professional organizations, has identified practical strategies that hospitals can refer
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of Alpha Radionuclide Therapy—How to Deal with Recoiling Daughters?
    Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 321-336; doi:10.3390/ph8020321 OPEN ACCESS pharmaceuticals ISSN 1424-8247 www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Review A Critical Review of Alpha Radionuclide Therapy—How to Deal with Recoiling Daughters? Robin M. de Kruijff, Hubert T. Wolterbeek and Antonia G. Denkova * Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.M.K.); [email protected] (H.T.W.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-15-27-84471. Academic Editor: Svend Borup Jensen Received: 15 April 2015 / Accepted: 1 June 2015 / Published: 10 June 2015 Abstract: This review presents an overview of the successes and challenges currently faced in alpha radionuclide therapy. Alpha particles have an advantage in killing tumour cells as compared to beta or gamma radiation due to their short penetration depth and high linear energy transfer (LET). Touching briefly on the clinical successes of radionuclides emitting only one alpha particle, the main focus of this article lies on those alpha-emitting radionuclides with multiple alpha-emitting daughters in their decay chain. While having the advantage of longer half-lives, the recoiled daughters of radionuclides like 224Ra (radium), 223Ra, and 225Ac (actinium) can do significant damage to healthy tissue when not retained at the tumour site. Three different approaches to deal with this problem are discussed: encapsulation in a nano-carrier, fast uptake of the alpha emitting radionuclides in tumour cells, and local administration. Each approach has been shown to have its advantages and disadvantages, but when larger activities need to be used clinically, nano-carriers appear to be the most promising solution for reducing toxic effects, provided there is no accumulation in healthy tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Information
    RADIOLOGICAL INFORMATION Frequently Asked Questions Radiation Information A. Radiation Basics 1. What is radiation? Radiation is a form of energy. It is all around us. It is a type of energy in the form of particles or electromagnetic rays that are given off by atoms. The type of radiation we are concerned with, during radiation incidents, is “ionizing radiation”. Radiation is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and invisible. 2. What is radioactivity? It is the process of emission of radiation from a material. 3. What is ionizing radiation? It is a type of radiation that has enough energy to break chemical bonds (knocking out electrons). 4. What is non-ionizing radiation? Non-ionizing radiation is a type of radiation that has a long wavelength. Long wavelength radiations do not have enough energy to "ionize" materials (knock out electrons). Some types of non-ionizing radiation sources include radio waves, microwaves produced by cellular phones, microwaves from microwave ovens and radiation given off by television sets. 5. What types of ionizing radiation are there? Three different kinds of ionizing radiation are emitted from radioactive materials: alpha (helium nuclei); beta (usually electrons); x-rays; and gamma (high energy, short wave length light). • Alpha particles stop in a few inches of air, or a thin sheet of cloth or even paper. Alpha emitting materials pose serious health dangers primarily if they are inhaled. • Beta particles are easily stopped by aluminum foil or human skin. Unless Beta particles are ingested or inhaled they usually pose little danger to people. • Gamma photons/rays and x-rays are very penetrating.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Particles Or Waves? Strange Laws at the Heart of Matter
    3. Particles or waves? Strange laws at the heart of matter Television news items or films sometimes show someone using a Geiger counter… maybe a prospector is searching for uranium, or perhaps a hospital worker is accounting for vital radioactive materials used to treat cancer. Geiger counters are particle detectors that make a characteristic clicking sound every time a high energy particle enters. Click – one particle; click – another particle. It is known that X-rays are emitted by electrons in the atom, whereas gamma rays, electromagnetic radiation of an even higher energy, are emitted from within the atomic nucleus. The clicking of a Geiger counter is a sign of quantum weirdness – the gamma ray waves are behaving as particles. In the same way that particles like electrons can sometimes behave as waves (we have mentioned how the wave properties of electrons allow us to study the structure of matter), all electromagnetic waves can occasionally act as particles. Every type of particle has a name, and particles of light are called photons. All electromagnetic waves, whether they are gamma rays, X-rays, visible, ultraviolet light, or radio waves, consist of photons. Another important property of electromagnetic waves is that, unlike other forms of waves such as sound, they do not need a medium to carry them. Sound waves require air to travel through, but all forms of light can propagate through empty space. It is because photons happily travel in the near vacuum of space that the radiation emitted by the Sun can heat the Earth. J. L. Cassingham with one of his company's Geiger counters, featured in an advertisement from 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Particle Spectroscopy
    Alpha Particle Spectroscopy Week of Sept. 13, 2010 Atomic and Nuclear Physics Laboratory (Physics 4780) The University of Toledo Instructor: Randy Ellingson Alpha Particle Spectroscopy • Alpha particle source – alpha decay • Context – understanding alpha particles • Energies • Interactions between alpha particles and matter (scattering and energy loss) • Semiconductor “radiation” detectors • SfSurface bibarrier detectors • Pulse generation (energy resolution?) • Data acquisition – digitization and “binning” • Multi‐channel analyzer Brief Review of Atomic Structure • Each atom consists of a positively charged core (the nucleus, contaning protons and neutrons, held together by nuclear forces ) surrounded by negatively‐charge shells (electrons). • Electrons exist in specific energy levels (orbits) around the nucleus. • Element is determined by # of protons. I.e., atoms of the same eltlement have the same # of protons, but can differ in the number of neutrons. Atoms of the same Masses: -31 me =911= 9.11 × 10 kg element (same # or protons) wihith different −27 mn = 1.67 ×10 kg # of neutrons are isotopes. Since # of −27 mp = 1.67 ×10 kg protons identifies the element, remember that # of protons is referred to as the atomic number (Z). Brief Review of Atomic Structure (continued) • Charges: electrons (‐1e), protons (+1e), and neutrons (0). • Magnitude of the charge on an electron = 1.602 x 10‐19 Coulombs. • Electrons are bound to the atom’s nucleus through the Coulomb force, in which opposite charges attract (“electrostatic force”). • Ions: basically, an atom is uncharged if the # of electrons = # of protons, and if not, you’ve got an ion (a charged atom). • Terminology for atoms, generalized to isotopes: (what is a nuclide?) A specific nuclide can be annotated as follows: A P X where A is the atomic mass number (# of protons + # of neutrons), P is the # of protons, and X is symbol for the element.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Emitting Radionuclides and Radiopharmaceuticals for Therapy"
    Report Technical Meeting on "Alpha emitting radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals for therapy" June, 24−28, 2013 IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria 1 BACKGROUND An alpha (α)-particle is a ionised 4He nucleus with a +2 electric charge and, therefore, it is relatively heavier than other subatomic particles emitted from decaying radionuclides such as electrons, neutrons, and protons. Because of this physical properties, α-particles are more effective ionization agents with linear energy transfer (LET) of the order of magnitude of 100 keV/µm, and are highly efficient in depositing energy over a short range in tissue (50–100 µm). Actually, a α-particle deposits 1500 times more energy per unit path length than a β- particle. The high mean energy deposition in tissues gives α-radiation exquisite cytotoxicity, which commonly manifests itself within the range of cell’s dimensions. This high LET may allow for an accurately controlled therapeutic modality that can be targeted to selected malignant cells with negligible burden to normal tissues. The short path length renders α-emitters suitable for treatment of minimal disease such as micro metastases or residual tumour after surgical resection of a primary lesion, hematologic cancers, infections, and compartmental cancers. A highly desirable goal in cancer therapy is the ability to target malignant cells while sparing normal cells. If significant differential targeting is achieved by a radiolabelled vector specifically designed to hold onto cancer cells, then a toxic payload on the vector will deliver a lethal dose preferentially to those cells expressing higher concentrations of the target molecule. This could be achieved by using highly cytotoxic α-particle radiation carried to specific sites of cancer cells by appropriate vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Ionizing Radiation Fact Sheet
    What is Ionizing Radiation? January 2003 Fact Sheet #3 Division of Environmental Health Office of Radiation Protection IONIZING RADIATION Ionizing radiation is radiation that has sufficient energy to remove orbital electrons from atoms, leading to the formation of ions. In this document, ionizing radiation will be referred to simply as radiation. One source of radiation is the nuclei of unstable atoms. For these radioactive atoms (also referred to as radionuclides or radioisotopes) to become more stable, the nuclei eject or emit subatomic particles and high-energy photons (gamma rays). This process is called radioactive decay. Unstable isotopes of radium, radon, uranium, and thorium, for example, exist naturally. Others are continually being made naturally or by human activities, such as the splitting of atoms in a nuclear reactor. Either way, they release ionizing radiation. Types of Ionizing Radiation ¨ Alpha Particle Radiation ¨ Beta Particle Radiation ¨ Gamma Ray Radiation ¨ X-Ray Radiation Alpha Particle Radiation An alpha particle consists of two neutrons and two protons ejected from the nucleus of an atom. The alpha particle is identical to the nucleus of a helium atom. Examples of alpha emitters are radium, radon, thorium, and uranium. Because alpha particles are charged and relatively heavy, they interact intensely with atoms in materials they encounter, giving up their energy over a very short range. In air, their travel distances are limited to approximately an inch. Alpha articles are easily shielded against and can be stopped by a single sheet of paper. Since alpha particles cannot penetrate the dead layer of the skin, they do not present a hazard from exposure external to the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Polonium-210
    Health Physics Society Fact Sheet Adopted: May 2010 Revised: June 2020 Health Physics Society Specialists in Radiation Safety Polonium-210 General In 1898, Marie and Pierre Curie discovered their first radioactive* element. It was later named polonium in honor of Marie Sklodowska Curie’s native Poland. Polonium, a naturally occurring element that can be found throughout our environment, results from the radioactive decay of radon-222 gas—a part of the uranium-238 decay chain. There are over 30 known isotopes of polonium, and all are radioactive, but the one occurring most in nature—and the one most widely used—is polonium-210 (210Po). With a half-life of 138 days, it decays to stable lead-206 by the emission of an alpha particle (an alpha particle has two protons and two neutrons). Radioactive materials are quantified by activity, or the number of disintegrations that occur over a period of time. A terabecquerel (TBq), for instance, is equal to 1 x 1012 disintegrations per second. Polonium-210 has a very high specific activity—activity per unit mass—of about 166 TBq per gram (4,490 curies, Ci, per gram). In other words, it doesn’t take a large physical amount to be very radioactive. Because of the high specific activity and the large associated thermal cross section, according to a human health fact sheet for 210Po produced by Argonne National Laboratory, a capsule containing about 0.5 grams (83 TBq) of 210Po can reach temperatures exceeding 500o C (ANL 2005). When it is purified, polonium melts at a low temperature and can be quite volatile.
    [Show full text]