DOCSLIB.ORG

Nordics - Alberta Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Nordics - Alberta Relations This map is a generalized illustration only and is not intended to be used for reference purposes. The representation of political boundaries does not necessarily reflect the position of the Government of Alberta on international issues of recognition, sovereignty or jurisdiction. PROFILE NORDICS OVERVIEW . Danish, Norwegian and Swedish are the working languages of official Nordic co- Capital: Copenhagen (Nordic Council and . The Nordic countries are a geographical and operation. Council of Ministers Headquarters) cultural region in Northern Europe and the Northern Atlantic and include Denmark, Population: 26.7 million (2016) TRADE AND INVESTMENT Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, plus Languages: Danish, Faroese, Finnish, the associated territories of Greenland, the . The Nordic region is the world’s eleventh Greenlandic, Icelandic, Norwegian, Sami and Faroe Islands and the Åland Islands. largest economy. Swedish . The Nordic Council is a geo-political inter- . From 2012 to 2016, Alberta’s goods exports to Secretary-General of the Nordic Council: Britt parliamentary forum for co-operation between the Nordics averaged CAD $98.1 million per Bohlin Olsson (since 2014) the Nordic countries. It consists of 87 year. Top exports included machinery (CAD $31.6 million), nickel (CAD $12.5 million), President of the Nordic Council: Britt Lundberg representatives, elected from its members’ (elected for the year of 2017) parliaments. plastic (CAD $11.3 million), and food waste and animal feed (CAD $10.8 million). The Vice President of the Nordic Council: Juho . Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and export figures do not include trade in services Eerola (elected for the year of 2017) Sweden have been full members of the Nordic (e.g. tourism, architecture and engineering or Council of Ministers since 1971. information technology services). Secretary General of the Council of Ministers: Dagfinn Høybråten (since 2013) . Greenland, the Faroe Islands, and Åland are . From 2012 to 2016, Alberta’s direct imports Presidency of the Council Ministers: Denmark considered associate countries but have had from the Nordics averaged CAD $213.0 million (for the year of 2017) increased representation with the Nordic per year, including machinery (CAD $67.2 Council since the adoption of the Åland million), electrical machinery (CAD $41.7 GDP: USD $1.45 trillion (2016) Document in 2007. They can choose to adopt million), optical, medical and other measuring GDP (PPP): 1.117 trillion current international decisions made in the Nordic Council of instruments (CAD $16.8 million), and mineral dollars (2017 estimate) Ministers as permitted by their agreements on fuel and oil (CAD $13.6 million). This figure autonomy. does not include goods sold in Alberta that GDP Per Capita (PPP): 52,688 current arrived via distribution hubs in other provinces. international dollars (2017 estimate) . The Council holds ordinary sessions each year in October/November and one additional . Canadian foreign direct investment stocks in GDP Growth Rate: 3.6 per cent (2016) session per year with a unique theme. the Nordics reached CAD $6.2 billion in 2016. Sources: World Bank, Nordic Cooperation Investment from the Nordics in Canada during . The Nordic Council is involved in various the same year was CAD $7.4 billion. forms of cooperation with neighboring areas, especially with the Baltic States and Russia. The total land area of the Nordic region is 3.43 million km², making it the seventh largest region in the world. Uninhabitable icecaps and glaciers comprise about half of this area. November 2017 | Input provided by Alberta Ministries of: Advanced Education, Agriculture and Forestry, Culture and Tourism, Economic Development and Trade, Education, Energy, and Labour . Canada and the Nordics enjoy a strong . Norway and, to some degree, Denmark are . The five Nordic countries of Denmark, commercial relationship with growing trade oil and gas exporters. Norway produces over Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden have flows, two-way investment levels, innovation 60 per cent than its domestic demand while announced ambitious goals towards and technology cooperation. Denmark produces approximately 50 per decarbonizing their energy systems by 2050, cent more than it requires. while contributing to European de- . In 2016, total exports from the Nordic Region carbonization through the export of clean to international markets were approximately . Norway’s oil production increased in 2015, electricity. The 2016 Nordic edition of the €86.1 billion. This was mostly driven by but new investment is declining. Statoil, IEA's Energy Technology Perspectives Sweden (€126 billion), Denmark (€86 billion) Norway’s state owned enterprise, has cut reveals that a near carbon-neutral energy and Norway (€80 billion). costs (capital expenditures) in the wake of system will require a dramatic restructuring current oil prices. of the transport sector, accelerated . Petroleum and petroleum products were the innovation to reduce industrial emissions, largest exports in 2016, totaling €37.4 billion in . Finland, Iceland and Sweden lack domestic and greater flexibility in the energy system to 2016. This was followed by chemical products sources of fossil energy and must import handle higher shares of variable renewables. (€23.3 billion), road vehicles (€21.6 billion), substantial amounts of petroleum, natural and medical and pharmaceutical products gas, and other energy resources. EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES (€21.2 billion). Nordic electricity, already 87 per cent . Opportunities for cooperation between . Total imports for the region in 2015 reached carbon-free, is largely generated from Canada and the Nordics include research in €330 billion. Top imports included road renewables. Hydropower is widely used in forestry, advanced materials, genomics and vehicles (€31.2 billion), chemical products Norway, which also has a growing share of pharmaceuticals, information technology, (€27.5 billion) and manufactured articles wind power. Geothermal heat and power environmental and arctic studies. (€25.2 million). production is the most important energy source in Iceland. The Nordic region’s excellence in the field of . Germany is the Nordic’s largest trading research and development (R&D) adds to its partner, with the total value of imports and . Nordic CO2 emissions per unit of electricity appeal as a business location. With clusters exports in 2016 of €104.2 billion. The second produced were one-fifth of the global of established research facilities and a highly largest was the Netherlands (€48.5 billion), average in 2016. skilled labour force, this region remains an followed by the United Kingdom (€47.8 billion) attractive location for firms engaged in high- . A World Energy Council’s Energy and Sweden (€47.1 billion). tech businesses requiring considerable Sustainability Index that assesses country investment in R&D. During the same year, Canada was the 28th energy security, energy equity, largest trading partner for the region, importing environmental sustainability and climate . On average, the five full members of the and exporting a total €5.2 billion in goods. policies ranks Sweden, Norway, Denmark Nordic council spent 2.7 per cent of GDP on and Finland as world’s second, third, fifth and R&D in science and technology. ENERGY eighth performer respectively. These are world’s best environmental performers. Digital Industries: The Nordics is one of the . The most important energy sources in the most advanced regions in the world in terms of Nordic countries in order of importance are: . Nordic energy co-operation has been its telecommunications and Internet oil, solid fuels (e.g. coal and wood), nuclear growing in recent years and is a key priority infrastructure and usage. Countries in this power, hydro, geothermal, solar power, and for the Nordic Council. region are consistently ranking among the gas. leading countries in terms of mobile phone, . Norway’s Sovereign Fund – Norway’s personal computer, Internet and broadband . Over a third of the Nordic region’s total Government Pension Fund (the world’s penetration. energy supply comes from renewable largest institutional investor) – is a leading sources. The largest of these is biomass and institution to include climate change . Internet and broadband access in households waste, which are used to generate electricity, considerations as an investment risk to their for five full member countries of the Nordics heat and transport fuels in Sweden, Finland long term portfolio. was 94.4 per cent in 2016. This is higher than and Denmark. the EU28 average of 85 per cent. Ninety-three per cent of the population uses the internet at . Norway, Finland and Sweden have relatively Bergen, as well as Arctic University of Norway least once a week, higher than that EU28 small proportion of agricultural land (3 - 8 per and the Norwegian University of Science and average of 79 per cent. cent) compared to total land territory, Technology. Denmark is one of the most intensely . With high rates of clean energy from reliable cultivated countries in the world, with a share . The U of C has exchange programs with power sources, combined with a highly of 62 per cent. numerous Nordic universities, including Oslo, educated workforce and cool climate, the Stavanger, Norwegian School of Sports Nordics are an ideal location for world class . There is a common trend among the Nordics Science, Orebro, Lund, Umea, Copenhagen, data centers. of declining beef meat production,
Recommended publications
  • The Regional Distribution of Zeolites in the Basalts of the Faroe Islands and the Significance of Zeolites As Palaeo- Temperature Indicators

    The Regional Distribution of Zeolites in the Basalts of the Faroe Islands and the Significance of Zeolites As Palaeo- Temperature Indicators

    The regional distribution of zeolites in the basalts of the Faroe Islands and the significance of zeolites as palaeo- temperature indicators Ole Jørgensen The first maps of the regional distribution of zeolites in the Palaeogene basalt plateau of the Faroe Islands are presented. The zeolite zones (thomsonite-chabazite, analcite, mesolite, stilbite-heulandite, laumontite) continue below sea level and reach a depth of 2200 m in the Lopra-1/1A well. Below this level, a high temperature zone occurs characterised by prehnite and pumpellyite. The stilbite-heulan- dite zone is the dominant mineral zone on the northern island, Vágar, the analcite and mesolite zones are the dominant ones on the southern islands of Sandoy and Suðuroy and the thomsonite-chabazite zone is dominant on the two northeastern islands of Viðoy and Borðoy. It is estimated that zeolitisa- tion of the basalts took place at temperatures between about 40°C and 230°C. Palaeogeothermal gradients are estimated to have been 66 ± 9°C/km in the lower basalt formation of the Lopra area of Suðuroy, the southernmost island, 63 ± 8°C/km in the middle basalt formation on the northernmost island of Vágar and 56 ± 7°C/km in the upper basalt formation on the central island of Sandoy. A linear extrapolation of the gradient from the Lopra area places the palaeosurface of the basalt plateau near to the top of the lower basalt formation. On Vágar, the palaeosurface was somewhere between 1700 m and 2020 m above the lower formation while the palaeosurface on Sandoy was between 1550 m and 1924 m above the base of the upper formation.
  • Homelessness Research and Policy Development: Examples from the Nordic Countries Lars Benjaminsen and Marcus Knutagård

    Homelessness Research and Policy Development: Examples from the Nordic Countries Lars Benjaminsen and Marcus Knutagård

    10th Anniversary Issue 45 Homelessness Research and Policy Development: Examples from the Nordic Countries Lars Benjaminsen and Marcus Knutagård SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Research, Copenhagen, Denmark School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden >> Abstract_ The interaction between research and policy development has played an important role in the transformation of homelessness policies and services over the last decade. Evidence from research on Housing First programmes and interventions in North America has informed the develop- ment of experimental Housing First programmes in many European countries. Moreover, studies on the profiles of homeless people and patterns of service use have supported an ongoing transition from mainly emergency and temporary responses towards strategic approaches with a focus on long-term and permanent solutions. This article will focus on the Nordic countries, where there has been close interaction between research and policy development in the formation of national strategies and programmes. In Denmark, Norway and Sweden, comprehensive national counts of homelessness have been carried out based on similar definitions and methodology and in Finland, monitoring of the extent and profiles of homelessness has been carried out for several years. In Denmark and Finland, national data have been used in the formation of national homelessness strategies that have been based on the Housing First principle, and data have been used to monitor developments in homelessness following implementation of these programmes. In Sweden, influential research on the staircase system has contributed to in-depth understanding of the unintended exclusion mechanisms that may sometimes be inherent in home- lessness policies. >> Keywords_ Homelessness research, policy development, strategic response, Housing First ISSN 2030-2762 / ISSN 2030-3106 online 46 European Journal of Homelessness _ Volume 10, No.
  • The Nordic Model: Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks

    The Nordic Model: Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks

    The Nordic Model The Nordic The Nordic Model Is there a Nordic model? What are the main characteristics of the Nord- ics? What challenges are they facing? Is the Nordic welfare state viable -Embracingglobalizationandsharingrisks in conditions of globalization and ageing populations? What reforms Embracing globalization and sharing risks are needed? The Nordic countries have attracted much international attention in re- cent years. The school system in Finland has repeatedly been ranked the best in the world. The Swedish pension reform is a benchmark in the international debate. Danish “flexicurity” figures prominently on the policy agenda in the EU and the OECD. The economic performance of the Nordic countries has been impressive in comparative terms: rapid growth, high employment, price stability, healthy surpluses in government finances. The Nordics have embraced globalization and new technologies. Cross-country comparisons sup- port the view that the Nordics have been successful in reconciling eco- nomic efficiency with social equality. While successful in the past, the Nordic model is facing increasingly Andersen, Holmström, Honkapohja, Korkman, Söderström,Vartiainen Andersen, Holmström,Honkapohja,Korkman, serious challenges in the future. Globalization and the demographic transformation have major consequences for labour markets and the public sector. The viability of the Nordic welfare state as it exists today is put into question. This report offers an in-depth analysis of the Nordic model, explaining its key features and evaluating its performance as well as setting out its challenges. It examines many of the “quick fixes” put forward in public debate and explains why they are unrealistic or based on erroneous rea- soning.
  • Faroe Islands and Greenland 2008

    Faroe Islands and Greenland 2008

    N O R D I C M E D I A T R E N D S 10 Media and Communication Statistics Faroe Islands and Greenland 2008 Compiled by Ragnar Karlsson NORDICOM UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG 2008 NORDICOM’s activities are based on broad and extensive network of contacts and collaboration with members of the research community, media companies, politicians, regulators, teachers, librarians, and so forth, around the world. The activities at Nordicom are characterized by three main working areas. Media and Communication Research Findings in the Nordic Countries Nordicom publishes a Nordic journal, Nordicom Information, and an English language journal, Nordicom Review (refereed), as well as anthologies and other reports in both Nordic and English langu- ages. Different research databases concerning, among other things, scientific literature and ongoing research are updated continuously and are available on the Internet. Nordicom has the character of a hub of Nordic cooperation in media research. Making Nordic research in the field of mass communication and media studies known to colleagues and others outside the region, and weaving and supporting networks of collaboration between the Nordic research communities and colleagues abroad are two prime facets of the Nordicom work. The documentation services are based on work performed in national documentation centres at- tached to the universities in Aarhus, Denmark; Tampere, Finland; Reykjavik, Iceland; Bergen, Norway; and Göteborg, Sweden. Trends and Developments in the Media Sectors in the Nordic Countries Nordicom compiles and collates media statistics for the whole of the Nordic region. The statistics, to- gether with qualified analyses, are published in the series, Nordic Media Trends, and on the homepage.
  • COASTAL WONDERS of NORWAY, the FAROE ISLANDS and ICELAND Current Route: Oslo, Norway to Reykjavik, Iceland

    COASTAL WONDERS of NORWAY, the FAROE ISLANDS and ICELAND Current Route: Oslo, Norway to Reykjavik, Iceland

    COASTAL WONDERS OF NORWAY, THE FAROE ISLANDS AND ICELAND Current route: Oslo, Norway to Reykjavik, Iceland 17 Days National Geographic Resolution 126 Guests Expeditions in: Jun From $22,470 to $44,280 * Call us at 1.800.397.3348 or call your Travel Agent. In Australia, call 1300.361.012 • www.expeditions.com DAY 1: Oslo, Norway padding Arrive in Oslo and check into the Hotel Bristol (or 2022 Departure Dates: similar) in the heart of the city. On an afternoon tour, stroll amid the city’s famed Vigeland 6 Jun sculptures—hundreds of life-size human figures Advance Payment: set in terraced Frogner Park. Visit the Fram Museum, showcasing the polar ship Fram and $3,000 dedicated to the explorers and wooden vessels that navigated the Arctic Sea in the late 1800s and Sample Airfares: early 1900s. The evening is free to explore Oslo Economy: from $900 on your own. (L) Business: from $2,700 Charter(Oslo/Tromso): from $490 DAY 2: Oslo / Tromsø / Embark Airfares are subject to change padding Take a charter flight to Tromsø, known as the Cost Includes: “gateway to the Arctic” due to the large number of Arctic expeditions that originated here. Visit the One hotel night in Oslo; accommodations; Arctic Cathedral, where the unique architecture meals indicated; alcoholic beverages evokes icebergs; and peruse the Polar Museum, (except premium brands); excursions; which showcases the ships, equipment, and services of Lindblad Expeditions’ Leader, seafaring traditions of early Arctic settlers. Embark Naturalist staff and expert guides; use of our ship this afternoon. (B,L,D) kayaks; entrance fees; all port charges and service taxes; gratuities to ship’s crew.
  • Different Paths Towards Autonomy

    Different Paths Towards Autonomy

    Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Sagnfræði Different paths towards autonomy: A comparison of the political status of the Faroe Islands and th Iceland in the first half of the 19 century Ritgerð til B. A.- prófs Regin Winther Poulsen Kt.: 111094-3579 Leiðbeinandi: Anna Agnarsdóttir Janúar 2018 Abstract This dissertation is a comparison of the political status of Iceland and the Faroe Islands within the Danish kingdom during the first half of the 19th century. Though they share a common history, the two dependencies took a radically different path towards autonomy during this period. Today Iceland is a republic while the Faroes still are a part of the Danish kingdom. This study examines the difference between the agendas of the two Danish dependencies in the Rigsdagen, the first Danish legislature, when it met for the first time in 1848 to discuss the first Danish constitution, the so-called Junigrundloven. In order to explain why the political agendas of the dependencies were so different, it is necessary to study in detail the years before 1848. The administration, trade and culture of the two dependencies are examined in order to provide the background for the discussion of the quite different political status Iceland and the Faroes had within the Danish kingdom. Furthermore, the debates in the Danish state assemblies regarding the re-establishment of the Alþingi in 1843 are discussed in comparison to the debates in the same assemblies regarding the re-establishment of the Løgting in 1844 and 1846. Even though the state assemblies received similar petitions from both dependencies, Alþingi was re-established in 1843, while the same did not happen with the Løgting in the Faroes.
  • MSCI Nordic Countries Index (EUR)

    MSCI Nordic Countries Index (EUR)

    MSCI Nordic Countries Index (EUR) The MSCI Nordic Countries Index captures large and mid cap representation across 4 Developed Markets (DM) countries*. With 81 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. CUMULATIVE INDEX PERFORMANCE — NET RETURNS (EUR) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE (%) (AUG 2006 – AUG 2021) MSCI Nordic Year Countries MSCI World MSCI ACWI MSCI Nordic Countries 2020 16.33 6.33 6.65 MSCI World 337.53 2019 22.16 30.02 28.93 MSCI ACWI 325.26 2018 -7.63 -4.11 -4.85 300 309.31 2017 10.32 7.51 8.89 2016 -1.26 10.73 11.09 2015 13.62 10.42 8.76 2014 7.36 19.50 18.61 200 2013 19.73 21.20 17.49 2012 20.20 14.05 14.35 2011 -15.16 -2.38 -4.25 2010 33.75 19.53 20.50 100 2009 42.48 25.94 30.43 2008 -51.11 -37.64 -39.20 50 2007 9.35 -1.66 0.71 Aug 06 Nov 07 Feb 09 May 10 Aug 11 Nov 12 Feb 14 May 15 Aug 16 Nov 17 Feb 19 May 20 Aug 21 INDEX PERFORMANCE — NET RETURNS (%) (AUG 31, 2021) FUNDAMENTALS (AUG 31, 2021) ANNUALIZED Since 1 Mo 3 Mo 1 Yr YTD 3 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr Dec 29, 2000 Div Yld (%) P/E P/E Fwd P/BV MSCI Nordic Countries 1.35 8.40 36.68 24.03 16.11 13.05 12.39 5.40 1.72 17.85 20.59 3.20 MSCI World 2.95 9.66 31.47 22.24 14.41 13.50 14.39 5.49 1.66 23.87 19.54 3.31 MSCI ACWI 2.97 8.31 30.33 20.14 13.79 12.97 13.50 5.50 1.71 22.54 18.46 3.07 INDEX RISK AND RETURN CHARACTERISTICS (AUG 31, 2021) ANNUALIZED STD DEV (%) 2 SHARPE RATIO 2 , 3 MAXIMUM DRAWDOWN Turnover Since 1 3 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr Dec 29, (%) Period YYYY-MM-DD (%) 2000 MSCI Nordic Countries 4.58 15.38 12.81 13.49 1.08 1.06 0.95 0.41 71.00 2000-04-28—2003-03-11 MSCI World 2.44 16.70 13.69 12.07 0.92 1.03 1.19 0.40 59.39 2000-08-31—2009-03-09 MSCI ACWI 3.17 16.28 13.29 11.89 0.91 1.02 1.14 0.36 53.06 2007-06-15—2009-03-09 1 Last 12 months 2 Based on monthly net returns data 3 Based on ICE LIBOR 1M * DM countries include: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.
  • The Nordic Council – Our Council the Nordic Council – Our Council © Nordic Council, 2012 ISBN 978-92-893-2372-7 DOI ANP 2012:737

    The Nordic Council – Our Council the Nordic Council – Our Council © Nordic Council, 2012 ISBN 978-92-893-2372-7 DOI ANP 2012:737

    The Nordic Council – our council The Nordic Council – our council © Nordic Council, 2012 ISBN 978-92-893-2372-7 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/ANP2012-737 ANP 2012:737 Editors: Silje Bergum Kinsten and Heidi Orava Design: Jette Koefoed Photos: Karin Beate Nøsterud; Ingram; Image Select; Ojo; Søren Sigfusson; Ludwig Ehlers/Landesarchiv Berlin; Photos from “50 år Nordisk Råd 1952–2002” Copies: 1500 Print: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk, Albertslund Printed in Denmark Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland. Nordic co-operation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and international collabora- tion, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic co-operation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive. Nordic Council Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K Telefon (+45) 3396 0200 www.norden.org The Nordic Council – our council Council Nordic The This brochure will provide you with a deeper insight into what the Nordic Council is all about. You will discover that the work of the Council exerts an influence on your life. Perhaps you would like to help exert influence on the Council. 4 The Nordic Council – our council Introduction 7 Out of the ashes 8 The first steps 10 Timeline 10 What issues does the Nordic Council address? 14 Closer to the people 17 Facts about the Nordic Council 22 It is also important that the people of the Region continue to consider the Council relevant to their lives.
  • Nordic Communities a Vision for the Future

    Nordic Communities a Vision for the Future

    Nordic Communities a vision for the future Johan Strang Nordic Communities a vision for the future Johan Strang Centre for nordiC StudieS, univerSity of HelSinki 1 Content Foreword 4 Summary 6 1 · The Nordic community and Nordic Communities 16 i. The Nordic Region in the world and in Europe 20 ii. The Stoltenberg and Wetterberg models 23 iii. Nordic Communities 25 iv. The democratic challenge 27 v. The Nordic community 29 2 · Key policy areas 34 i. Foreign and defence policy 36 ii. EU policy 40 iii. Economic and welfare policy 42 iv. Environmental and energy policy 46 v. Research, innovation, education and training 50 vi. Culture and language 52 vii. Law and legislation 55 2 3 · Official Nordic ­­co-operation 60 i. The Nordic Council of Ministers 63 ii. The Nordic Council 69 iii. A Nordic network think tank 74 iv. The Nordic institutions 76 v. Unofficial and official co-operation 77 vi. Informal co-operation at the official level 78 4 · The Nordic brand 84 List of people involved in the re search for this book 90 3 Foreword Although commissioned to mark the 60th anniversary of the Nordic Council in 2012, this is no run-of-the-mill commemorative publica- tion. Rather than taking a retrospective approach, it looks to the future of Nordic co-operation, following up on the debate rekindled by the Swedish historian Gunnar Wetterberg’s book United Nordic Federation (2010) and the Stoltenberg report (2009) on working more closely together on foreign and security policy. In spring 2011, the Nordic Council commissioned the Centre for Nordic Studies (CENS) at the University of Helsinki to conduct a study and to pre- sent proposals for strengthening Nordic co-operation.
  • Nordic Tourism Outlook 15 15 March 2018 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 1 15 15 Nordic Travel Relative to Wider Global Demand

    Nordic Tourism Outlook 15 15 March 2018 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 1 15 15 Nordic Travel Relative to Wider Global Demand

    15 15 15 15 15 15 22 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Nordic Tourism Outlook 15 15 March 2018 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 1 15 15 Nordic travel relative to wider global demand Europe has long been the recipient of the lion's share of international travel including some of the most popular destinations in the world. In Nordics in the context of global arrivals 2000, it received 57% of total global visitors. However, despite growth No. of arrivals (000s) in European arrivals its share has since diminished. 1,400,000 The Nordic region is a subset of Europe, which in itself received 3% of Middle East & Africa 1,200,000 total global arrivals in 2000. And while the rest of Europe's global share Americas was diminishing, the Nordic region continued to attract 3% share of all travel in 2017. Growth in the Nordic region outpaced travel to the rest 1,000,000 Nordics of Europe over this period. Rest of Europe 800,000 The majority of European arrivals come from within the region, but Asia Pacific rising household wealth and travel demand, along with increased connectivity and development of emerging destinations has facilitated 600,000 an increased propensity for travelling further afield. This has allowed some other regions to gain share. 400,000 In addition, the rate of economic growth in Asia and household wealth accumulation has created demand that did not previously exist, with 200,000 the emergence of a new travel class in emerging markets such as China.
  • European Public Law, Volume 9, Issue 2 # Kluwer Law International, 2003

    European Public Law, Volume 9, Issue 2 # Kluwer Law International, 2003

    DENMARK The Position of Greenland and the Faroe Islands Within the Danish Realm Jùrgen Albñk Jensen* The Danish Realm consists of three separate parts ± Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands. The population of Denmark is a little more than five million, whereas the populations of Greenland and the Faroe Islands are about 50,000 each. This fact alone indicates that Denmark is the dominant part of the Realm. On the other hand, both Greenland and the Faroe Islands are separate entities with their own culture and language, and ± for Greenland ± also their own ethnic origin as part of the Inuit people. It is obvious that this situation involves a great potential for conflict, and, although it has been possible until now to adapt the relationship between the three parts of the Realm to the changing circumstances so that major conflicts have been avoided, there has in recent years been a growing feeling of national identity in the two small parts of the realm ± especially in the Faroe Islands. The purpose of this article is to explain the position of the Faroe Islands and Greenland within the Danish Realm from a legal perspective. In the first part of the article, I will look at the historic relationship between Denmark and the two other parts of the Realm. In the second part of the article, I will discuss the details of the present constitutional arrangement between the three parts of the Realm, which can be characterized as a form of home rule for Greenland and the Faroe Islands within a unitary state.
  • Uffe Oestergaard

    Uffe Oestergaard

    From Enemies to Friends Political Culture and History in the Nordic Countries Østergaard, Uffe Document Version Final published version Publication date: 2015 License CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Østergaard, U. (2015). From Enemies to Friends: Political Culture and History in the Nordic Countries. Paper presented at Regions of Peace and Conflicts, Kampala, Uganda. Link to publication in CBS Research Portal General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us ([email protected]) providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 How Enemies can Become Friends. Regions of Peace and Conflicts: The Nordic Countries 1814–2014 and the Great Lakes Region 1964–2014 1. From Enemies to Friends – Political Culture and History in the Nordic Countries1 Uffe Østergård The Nordic countries are normally seen as small, peaceful and egalitarian democracies, internationally oriented and strong supporters of law and order among the nations of the world. There is some truth to this conventional wisdom but it does not cover the whole picture. Or rather, there are some backdrops to the total reliance on the principle of national self-determination in sovereign states which have to be taken into account when evaluating the positive sides of the political culture in this northern part of Europe (cf.