DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities (PDF) STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TR0003 (REV 10/98) formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-MTI-16-1233 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities August 2016 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Stephanie DiPetrillo, M.Arch, MCRP, Andrea Lubin, MS, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Ph.D., MTI Report 12-59 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business San José State University San José, CA 95192-0219 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER DTRT12-G-UTC21 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation (Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Final Report Information)MS-42, PO Box 942873,Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Technology University Transportation Centers Program 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT Persons with disabilities can achieve a greater degree of freedom when they have full access to a variety of transit modes, but this can only be achieved when the pathways to transit – the infrastructure and conditions in the built environment – allow full access to transit stops, stations, and vehicles. Since passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, many transit agencies and governmental jurisdictions have made significant progress in this area. Policy initiatives, incremental enhancements, modifications, and other measures undertaken by transit agencies and their partners have significantly improved access to transit for persons with disabilities, others who rely on public transportation, and individuals who chose to utilize these services. This research study explores, through case study work, efforts that have been effective in improving pathways to transit. Interviews and site visits were conducted with five transit agencies, along with their partners, that are actively engaged in improving pathways to connect transit consumers – particularly people with disabilities – with transit stations and stops. These agencies are: Broward County Transit (Broward County, FL), Memphis Area Transit Authority (Memphis, TN), NJ TRANSIT (Newark and New Brunswick, NJ), Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Portland, OR), and Link Transit (Wenatchee, WA). Promising practices and/or lessons were identified through the case study analysis; these should be considered by any transit agency seeking to create improved access to its services for persons with disabilities. 17. KEY WORDS 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Pathways; public transportation; disability; infrastructure No restrictions. This document is available to the public through The improvements; mobility management National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION (of this report) 20. NUMBER OF PAGES 21. COST OF REPORT CHARGED Unclassified 115 $15.00 Reproduction of completed page authorized. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This document is disseminated in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This publication does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. This report does not constitute an endorsement by the Department of any product described herein. This research does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Mineta National Transit Research Consortium, the Federal Transit Administration, or anyone who provided information for this research. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this report, including errors and omissions. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information, call (916) 654-8899, TTY 711, or write to California Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation and System Information, MS-83, P.O. Box 942873, Sacramento, CA 94273-0001. Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities MTI Report 12-59 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe,Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the SurfaceTransportation Extension Act of 2011 to be named aTier 1Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation community. MTI’s transportation policy work is centered on three primary responsibilities: Research MTI works to provide policy-oriented research for all levels of Department of Transportation, MTI delivers its classes over government and the private sector to foster the development a state-of-the-art videoconference network throughout the of optimum surface transportation systems. Research areas in- state of California and via webcasting beyond, allowing clude: transportation security; planning and policy development; working transportation professionals to pursue an advanced interrelationships among transportation, land use, and the degree regardless of their location. To meet the needs of environment; transportation finance; and collaborative labor- employers seeking a diverse workforce, MTI’s education management relations. Certified Research Associates conduct program promotes enrollment to under-represented groups. the research. Certification requires an advanced degree, gener­ ally a Ph.D., a record of academic publications, and profession- Information andTechnologyTransf er all references. Research projects culminate in a peer-reviewed MTI promotes the availability of completed research to publication, available both in hardcopy and on TransWeb, the professional organizations and journals and works to MTI website (http://transweb.sjsu.edu). integrate the research findings into the graduate education program. In addition to publishing the studies, the Institute Education also sponsors symposia to disseminate research results to The educational goal of the Institute is to provide graduate-lev- transportation professionals and encourages Research el education to students seeking a career in the development Associates to present their findings at conferences. The and operation of surface transportation programs. MTI, through World in Motion, MTI’s quarterly newsletter, covers San José State University, offers an AACSB-accredited Master of innovation in the Institute’s research and education pro- Science in Transportation Management and a graduate Certifi- grams. MTI’s extensive collection of transportation-related cate in Transportation Management that serve to prepare the na- publications is integrated into San José State University’s tion’s transportation managers for the 21st century. The master’s world-class Martin Luther King, Jr.Library. degree is the highest conferred by the California State Uni­ versity system. With the active assistance of the California DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program and the California Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. This report does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. government, State of California, or the Mineta Transportation Institute, who assume no liability for the contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard specification, design standard, or regulation. REPORT 12-59 IMPROVING PATHWAYS TO TRANSIT FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Stephanie DiPetrillo, M.Arch, MCRP Andrea Lubin, MS Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Ph.D. Carla Salehian, MA Stephen Gibson, MURP
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Multi‐Disciplinary Commentaries on a Blueprint for Prosperity
    June 2015 Multi‐disciplinary Commentaries on a Blueprint for Prosperity Foreword The City of Memphis’ Blue Print for Prosperity is a city initiated effort to partner with other local initiatives, organizations and agencies to increase the wealth among low income citizens, increase their resiliency to meet daily financial exigencies and reduce poverty. A number of factors contribute to those challenges. Thus any successful effort to address them requires a multidisciplinary approach. In June 2014, a set of researchers at the University of Memphis across a range of academic colleges and departments was invited to discuss approaches to wealth creation and poverty reduction for the various perspectives of their various disciplines. Based on that conversation, they were asked to submit policy briefs from those perspectives with recommendations to contribute to a community process to produce a plan for action. The following report summarizes and provides those briefs. Participants in the report and their contributions include: David Cox, Ph.D., Department of Public and Nonprofit Administration, School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, College of Arts and Sciences. Project Director Debra Bartelli, DrPH., Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health. Health Care/Mental Health and Wellness Strand Cyril Chang, Ph.D., Department of Economics, Fogelman School of Business and Economics. Health Care/Mental Health and Wellness Strand Beverly Cross, Ph.D., Department of Instruction and Curriculum Leadership, College of Education, Health and Human Sciences. Education and Early Development Strand Elena Delevega, Ph.D., Department of Social Work, School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, College of Arts and Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Van D
    THIS PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS DATED JANUARY 23, 2019 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: See “RATINGS” herein. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, rulings, and judicial decisions and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and continuous compliance with certain covenants described herein, interest on the Series 2019 Bonds (defined below) is excludable from gross income under federal income tax laws pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date of delivery of the Series 2019 Bonds, and such interest is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that, under existing law, the Series 2019 Bonds and the income therefrom shall be free from all state, county and municipal taxation in the State of Tennessee, except inheritance, transfer and estate taxes, and Tennessee franchise and excise taxes. For a more complete description, see “TAX MATTERS” herein. SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE $170,865,000* $72,460,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, AND SCHOOL BONDS, 2019 SERIES A 2019 SERIES B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover This Official Statement relates to the issuance by the County of Shelby, Tennessee (the “County”) of $170,865,000* in aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Public Improvement and School Bonds, 2019 Series A (the “Series 2019A Bonds”) and $72,460,000* in aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2019 Series B (the “Series 2019B Bonds”, and together with the Series 2019A Bonds the “Series 2019 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development By Ian Robinson Carlton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Professor Robert Cervero Professor Dwight Jaffee Fall 2013 © Copyright by Ian Robinson Carlton 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Globally, urban development near transit stations has long been understood to be critical to transit’s success primarily because it can contribute to ridership and improve the efficiency of transit investments. In the United States in particular, fixed-guideway transit’s land use-shaping capability has been an important justification and goal for transit investment. In fact, today’s U.S. federal funding policies increasingly focus on achieving transit-oriented real estate development near new transit infrastructure. However, the widespread implementation of transit and land use coordination practices has been considered an uphill battle. The academic literature suggests the most effective practice may be for U.S. transit planners to locate transit stations where pre-existing conditions are advantageous for real estate development or transit investments can generate the political will to dramatically alter local conditions to make them amenable to real estate development. However, prior to this study, no research had investigated the influence of real estate development considerations on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • No Action Alternative Report
    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operating Environment
    MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT June 16, 2011 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 AGENCY OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 Organizational and Institutional Structure ................................................................................................. 2 3 TRANSIT SERVICES ............................................................................................................................... 2 Fixed Route Bus Service .......................................................................................................................... 2 Rail Trolley Service ................................................................................................................................... 6 Paratransit Service (MATAplus) ................................................................................................................ 7 Special Event Shuttle Service ................................................................................................................... 7 4 PASSENGER FARES .............................................................................................................................. 7 Fixed-Route Bus Fares ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors to Consider in Designing a Joint Bus-Light Rail Transit Mall
    156 TRB Special Report 195 Factors to Consider in Designing a Joint Bus-Light Rail Transit Mall R. DAVID MINISTER and DAVID J. CLARKE, Santa Clara County Transportation Agency Cities are turning more and more to bus and LRT transit planning, design, or construction of such a facility are mall solutions primarily because the costs of building a listed in Table 1. transit mall for servicing downtown areas are between $15 At about the same time that North American transit and $30 million per mile (1981 doilars) whereas building a experts were rediscovering the streetcar by visiting subway would cost between $60 and $120 million per mile modern light rail installations in Europe, an interest in bus in a CBD environment. Ongoing energy, maintenance, and transit malls began to spring up. First tested on Nicollet security costs are also much less with a transit mall than Avenue in Minneapolis in 1967, the basic idea of a transit with a subway station alternative, and pedestrian access is mall is to combine a pedestrian mall with an exclusive much quicker and easier, particularly for elderly and roadway for transit vehicles. In 1976, Portland, Oregon, handicapped persons. This paper identifies and describes received approval to construct a bus transit mall on 2 one- key design factors considered in the development of a joint way downtown streets. In the same year Chestnut Street bus-light rail transit mall for the downtown area in San in Philadelphia was converted into a bus transit mall in Jose, California. Other light rail mall designs researched time for celebrating the nations bicentennial.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2018 Business Plan
    Dallas Area Rapid Transit FY 2018 BUSINESS PLAN Including FY 2018 Annual Budget and Twenty-Year Financial Plan FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 1 7/31/17 9:40 AM DART BOARD MEMBERS Sue Bauman Dallas Catherine Cuellar Dallas and Cockrell Hill Mark C. Enoch Garland, Rowlett and Glenn Heights Tim A. Hayden Carrollton and Irving Ray Jackson Dallas Jonathan R. Kelly Garland Patrick Kennedy Dallas Jon-Bertrell Killen Dallas Michele Wong Krause Dallas Amanda Moreno Dallas Gary Slagel Richardson, University Park, Addison and Highland Park Rick Stopfer Irving Dominique Torres Dallas Paul N. Wageman Plano Faye Moses Wilkins Plano and Farmers Branch FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 2 7/31/17 9:40 AM FY 2018 Business Plan (09/26/17) How to Use This Book What’s in this Book This book contains the Business Plan for Fiscal Year 2018 (FY 2018 – which ends September 30, 2018) for Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART or the Agency). The Business Plan provides the DART Board of Directors, customers, taxpayers, elected officials, and other stakeholder groups of our region with a comprehensive summary of the Agency's plans and commitments to improve regional mobility, enhance the quality of life, and stimulate economic development. This document consolidates the key elements of the FY 2018 Annual Budget, the FY 2018 Twenty-Year Financial Plan, the Transit System Plan, and the Agency's Strategic Plan. A summary of the information contained in the various sections follows. The formal Letter of Transmittal summarizes priorities and issues for the upcoming year. The section titled Who We Are should help those not familiar with DART to understand the basis from which the Agency operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • KINGS of the HILL Union Leaders Plan Next Steps After Voters OK Sales Tax Hike
    Public Records & Notices View a complete day’s public records and notices at memphisdailynews.com. www.chandlerreports.com Tuesday, October 8, 2019 MemphisDailyNews.com Vol. 134 | No. 160 Rack–50¢/Delivery–39¢ Fire, police KINGS OF THE HILL union leaders plan next steps after voters OK sales tax hike YOLANDA JONES Courtesy of The Daily Memphian Fire and police union officials plan next week to begin hashing out details about implementing the half-cent sales tax increase approved by voters Thursday to restore benefits and pensions. “Monday morning, we are going to sit down and create our team as we move from campaign mode to phase 2,” said John Covington, the Chief Steward for the Memphis Police Association. “Sources are telling me that city government is ready to sit down and figure out all the things that need to be worked out to implement everything. “Right now, we are catching our breath and get- ting ourselves together. Our point of view is the real work starts Monday. We want to make sure we do it right – dot all the I’s and cross all the T’s, so that’s where we are right now.” Covington said no meetings have been set with city officials yet and that union officials plan to meet with their attorney next week to discuss next steps. A half-century after road builders created a nine-acre mound for a Crosstown section of Interstate 40 that was never built, the “Our next step is then to reach out to council city now has two developers working together on a plan for the “Crosstown Mound.” (Jim Weber/Courtesy of The Daily Memphian) members and the city and go from there,” Coving- ton said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shoppes at Beacon Light 2400-2490 N
    The Shoppes at Beacon Light 2400-2490 N. Federal Highway, Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Prominent End Cap Expandable 2,825 SF Footprint Plus Approved 1,500 SF Outdoor Seating Two Second Generation Restaurant Spaces N.E.G. Property Services, Inc. 6218 N Federal Highway A Selection of Five Other Retail Spaces Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 Located on Federal Highway/US 1 Offi ce: (954) 491-2281 Fax: (954) 491-2298 Traffi c Count of 48,000 Cars Per Day www.negproperty.com RES PD MAR BO THEATERS Q SPORTS AUTHORITY T. WHOL E FOODS (future) RUBINO BOBBY STON KET 'S Nor th Feder al Highw ay (U.S. 1 Shoppes at Beacon Light Shoppes at Beacon Site Plan ) FEDE RA L HI GHWAY O FF ERDAHL'S CAFE ERDAHL'S SHEAR SHEAR EX CI AVAILABLE PYLON TEMEN 2,825 SF 2476 2482 2484 1809 2468 SUITE ITALIA T SICILI EYE S C VISION N EN RE SIG MGMT OFFICE EYEBROW AN T DESIGN ST ITE E OVEN AURANT R N EXTRAVAGANT TROPICAL WAX PAMPERING METER R & TAN SPA, LLC OO M TOP NAILS SWEET L PET HAVEN HOUSE AU Second Gen CO NDR FETTA IN BLUE ROOM REPUBLIC Y SHOE REPAIR SALON BEE INS DRIFT FREEDIVE SUITE 2476A & 2478 2,926 SF eration EDWARD D. JONES CHINA KING SUITE 2476 825 rsf AVAILABLE SUITES AVAILABLE 1,609 SF N.E. 24thStreet(LighthousePointDrive) SUITE 1823 WORDEN'S ART & FRAME SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLY Restaurant SQ. FT SQ. 825 SF 1,333 2,139 4,478 N.E. 25thStreet 631 600 STATE FARM INSURANCE 825 S.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]