DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Storage Technology Comparison

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Storage Technology Comparison Energy Storage Technology Comparison From a Swedish perspective Felix Söderström Bachelor of Science Thesis KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Energy Technology EGI-2016 SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Bachelor of Science Thesis EGI-2016 Energy Storage Technology Comparison From a Swedish perspective Felix Söderström Approved Examiner Supervisor Viktoria Martin Justin Chiu Saman Nimali Gunasekara ABSTRACT Due to increased usage of renewable energy sources a need to store energy, from times of low demand or high production to times of higher demand or lower production, have risen. This report is meant to serve as a comparison between different methods of energy storage from a Swedish point of view. Several technical aspects as well as environmental and social impacts of different energy storage methods have been compared. The conclusion reached is that PHES is still the most favourable way of storing energy due to the good performance and reliability it offers. If found possible, Sweden should therefore continuously expand the usage of PHES as well as continuing to improve the turbine efficiency. If further expansion of PHES is not possible, CAES could serve as a replacement due to similar performance. For storing energy during shorter periods of time, Li-Ion batteries or Na-S batteries are the most viable options. High efficiency and energy density as well as low costs are all desired characteristics. In most regards, Li-Ion batteries outperforms Na-S. Li-Ion should therefore be considered the primary way to store energy for shorter times in Sweden, despite Li-Ion’s slightly larger environmental impact. 1 SAMMANFATTNING På grund av en ökad användning av förnyelsebara energikällor har även behovet av att kunna lagra energi från tillfällen då mycket energi genereras eller efterfrågan är låg, för att sedan kunna använda energin då efterfrågan är högre, ökat markant. Den här rapporten är menad att jämföra olika metoder av energilagring ur ett svenskt perspektiv. Flera tekniska aspekter samt miljömässiga och sociala påverkningar hos flera energilagringsmetoder har jämförts. Slutsatsen som nåtts är att PHES ännu är den mest gynnsamma metoden att lagra energi baserat på dess goda prestationer samt dess pålitlighet. I den mån det är möjligt bör Sverige därför fortsatt försöka expander PHES samt fortsatt arbeta med att förbättra turbineffektivitet. Om vidare expansion ej är möjligt längre är möjligt kan CAES användas för långvarig energilagring på grund av dess liknande egenskaper. För kortvarigare lagring är Li-Ion eller Na-S de mest gångbara alternativen. God effektivitet och hög energidensitet samt låg kostnad är alla åtråvärda egenskaper. I de flesta av dessa aspekter presterar Li-Ion batterier bättre än Na-S. Li-Ion bör därför vara det primära sättet att lagra energi kortvarigt i Sverige, trots dess något större miljöpåverkan. NOMENCLATURE AC – Alternating Current PHES – Pumped Hydro Energy Storage CAES – Compressed Air Energy System SHS – Sensible Heat Storage DC – Direct Current SMES – Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage FES – Flywheel Energy Storage TCS – Thermochemical Storage LHS – Latent Heat Storage TES – Thermal Energy Storage Li-Ion – Lithium-Ion UPS – Uninterrupted Power Supply Na-S – Sodium-Sulphur 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 PURPOSE & DELIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2 ENERGY STORAGE METHODS ............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 MECHANICAL ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Flywheel Energy Storage (FES) ........................................................................................................ 6 2.1.3 Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (PHES) ........................................................................................... 8 2.2 ELECTRICAL ........................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) ......................................................................... 9 2.3 ELECTROCHEMICAL .............................................................................................................................. 10 2.3.1 Supercapacitors ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Battery Storage Technologies ......................................................................................................... 11 2.4 CHEMICAL ............................................................................................................................................ 17 2.4.1 Power-to-Gas .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.5 THERMAL ............................................................................................................................................. 18 2.5.1 Sensible Heat Storage (SHS) ........................................................................................................... 18 2.5.2 Latent Heat Storage (LHS) .............................................................................................................. 19 2.5.3 Thermo-Chemical Storage (TCS) .................................................................................................... 20 3 COMPARISON .......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.1 Technical aspects ............................................................................................................................ 24 3.1.2 Environmental impact ..................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.3 Social impact ................................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.4 Technology maturity ........................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.5 Need and availability ...................................................................................................................... 28 3.2 CASE STUDY – WIND FARM AT BIOTESTSJÖN ....................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Approach ......................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2 Case study conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 31 4 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 32 4.1 FUTURE WORK ..................................................................................................................................... 32 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 33 6 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 34 3 1 INTRODUCTION Renewable sources of energy are becoming responsible for a larger share of electricity produced all over the world. Since it is not possible to regulate when and how much electricity that is generated from sources such as solar and wind power, a way to store the excess energy from times of lower demand or higher production is needed. During the last century several methods have been developed, ranging from the enormous water reservoirs of the pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) to the modern and theoretically optimal superconducting magnetic energy storage. Since applications and conditions vary between techniques, a comparison is necessary to evaluate what type of energy storage is needed. Comparisons have been done before, the intention with this bachelor of science thesis report however, is to have evaluated the results from a “Swedish point of view”. 1.1 PURPOSE & DELIMITATIONS This thesis has focused on energy storage from a “Swedish point of view”. General properties such as life time, efficiency, capacity, power, energy density and response time is regarded, as are costs, environmental and sustainability aspects, social effects and geographical requirements. The targeted technologies are those that are ready for the market today or in the near future. The aim for this paper is to end in a comprehensive comparison containing necessary information and a recommendation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flywheel Energy Storage
    Energy and the Environment Capstone Design Project { Bass Connections 2017 Flywheel Energy Storage (FES): Exploring Alternative Use Cases Randy Frank, Mechanical Engineering '17 Jessica Matthys, Mechanical Engineering '17 Caroline Ayanian, Mechanical Engineering '17 Daniel Herron, Civil and Environmental Engineering '17 Nathaniel Sizemore, Public Policy '17 Cameron Simpson, Economics '17 Dante Cordaro, Economics '18 Jack Carey, Environmental Science and Policy '17 Spring 2017 Contents 1 Abstract 3 2 Introduction 3 2.1 Energy Markets............................................3 3 Concept Generation 6 3.1 Traditional Energy Storage Methods................................6 3.2 Decision Matrix............................................7 4 Technology Background 8 4.1 Flywheel Past and Present......................................8 4.2 Flywheel Energy Storage Fundamentals..............................8 4.3 Limiting Factors to FES Storage Capacity.............................9 4.4 Additional Mechanical Components................................ 10 4.5 Electrical Components........................................ 14 5 Prototype Design 14 5.1 Prototype Overview and Goals................................... 14 5.2 Bill of Materials........................................... 15 5.3 Material Selection.......................................... 15 5.4 Motor Selection............................................ 15 5.5 Timeline................................................ 17 5.6 Prototype Assembly......................................... 17 5.7 Prototype
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage Technology Assessment Prepared for Public Service Company of New Mexico
    Energy Storage Technology Assessment Prepared for Public Service Company of New Mexico HDR Report No. 10060535-0ZP-C1001 Revision B - Draft October 30, 2017 Principal Investigators Todd Aquino, PE Chris Zuelch, PE Cristina Koss Publi c Service Company of New Mexico | Energy Storage Technology Assessment Table of Contents I. Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Introduction / Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 3 III. The Need for Energy Storage ............................................................................................................... 6 V. Energy Storage Technologies ............................................................................................................... 7 VI. Battery Storage Technologies .............................................................................................................. 7 Lithium Ion Battery ................................................................................................................................. 13 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Maturity .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Technological Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Flywheel Energy Storage – a Smart Grid Approach to Supporting Wind Integration
    Flywheel Energy Storage – a Smart Grid Approach to Supporting Wind Integration Chet Lyons (Beacon Power Corp.) — Tyngsboro, Massachusetts, USA — [email protected] Wind developers face tough challenges in integrating and operating wind resources on today's grid. A recently commercialized inertial energy storage technology can help address several issues of common interest to wind developers, utilities and grid operators. These include the need for more regulation to help balance generation and load as wind penetration rises; the projected shortfall in some grid areas of regional ramping capacity that is needed to cope with wind’s variability; and the difficulty of developing wind generation in smaller balancing areas that lack sufficient regulation and ramping capacity. After more than 10 years of development and successful scale-power tests in California and New York, in 2008 Beacon Power began operating the world’s first commercial 1 MW flywheel frequency regulation system under ISO New England’s Advanced Technologies Pilot Program. Beacon’s resource has since expanded to two megawatts, and by the end of 2009 is expected to be three megawatts. (See Figure 1) Figure 1: 1 MW Flywheel Regulation System Operating in New England Flywheels are installed below grade while the power electronics, monitoring and control systems are housed in a steel cargo container A flywheel energy storage system is elegant in its simplicity. The ISO monitors the frequency of the grid, and based on North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) frequency control guidelines the ISO decides when more or less generation is needed to balance generation with load. When generation exceeds load, the ISO’s regulation dispatch control signal directs the flywheels to absorb energy from the grid and store it kinetically by spinning the flywheels faster.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Storage Impact on CHP Cogeneration Performance with Southwoods Case Study Edmonton, Alberta Michael Roppelt C.E.T
    Thermal Storage Impact on CHP Cogeneration Performance with Southwoods Case Study Edmonton, Alberta Michael Roppelt C.E.T. CHP Cogeneration Solar PV Solar Thermal Grid Supply Thermal Storage GeoExchange RenewableAlternative & LowEnergy Carbon Microgrid Hybrid ConventionalSystemSystem System Optional Solar Thermal Option al Solar PV CNG & BUILDING OR Refueling COMMUNITY Station CHP Cogeneration SCALE 8 DEVELOPMENT Hot Water Hot Water DHW Space Heating $ SAVINGS GHG OPERATING Thermal Energy Cool Water Exchange & Storage ElectricalMicro Micro-Grid-Grid Thermal Microgrid Moving Energy not Wasting Energy Natural Gas Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Cogeneration $350,000 2,500,000 kWh RETAILINPUT OUTPUT VALUE NATURAL GAS $400,000. $100,000.30,000 Gj (85% Efficiency) CHP $50,000 Cogeneration15,000 Energy Gj Technologies CHP Unit Sizing Poorly sized units will not perform optimally which will cancel out the benefits. • For optimal efficiency, CHP units should be designed to provide baseline electrical or thermal output. • A plant needs to operate as many hours as possible, since idle plants produce no benefits. • CHP units have the ability to modulate, or change their output in order to meet fluctuating demand. Meeting Electric Power Demand Energy Production Profile 700 Hourly Average 600 353 January 342 February 500 333 March 324 April 400 345 May 300 369 June 400 July 200 402 August 348 September 100 358 October 0 362 November 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Meeting Heat Demand with CHP Cogeneration Energy Production Profile Heat Demand (kWh) Electric Demand (kWh) Cogen Heat (kWh) Waste Heat Heat Shortfall Useable Heat CHP Performance INEFFICIENCY 15% SPACE HEATING DAILY AND HEAT 35% SEASONAL ELECTRICAL 50% IMBALANCE 35% 50% DHW 15% Industry Studies The IEA works to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 30 member countries and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Flywheel Energy Storage for Automotive Applications
    Energies 2015, 8, 10636-10663; doi:10.3390/en81010636 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Review Flywheel Energy Storage for Automotive Applications Magnus Hedlund *, Johan Lundin, Juan de Santiago, Johan Abrahamsson and Hans Bernhoff Division for Electricity, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (H.B.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-18-471-5804. Academic Editor: Joeri Van Mierlo Received: 25 July 2015 / Accepted: 12 September 2015 / Published: 25 September 2015 Abstract: A review of flywheel energy storage technology was made, with a special focus on the progress in automotive applications. We found that there are at least 26 university research groups and 27 companies contributing to flywheel technology development. Flywheels are seen to excel in high-power applications, placing them closer in functionality to supercapacitors than to batteries. Examples of flywheels optimized for vehicular applications were found with a specific power of 5.5 kW/kg and a specific energy of 3.5 Wh/kg. Another flywheel system had 3.15 kW/kg and 6.4 Wh/kg, which can be compared to a state-of-the-art supercapacitor vehicular system with 1.7 kW/kg and 2.3 Wh/kg, respectively. Flywheel energy storage is reaching maturity, with 500 flywheel power buffer systems being deployed for London buses (resulting in fuel savings of over 20%), 400 flywheels in operation for grid frequency regulation and many hundreds more installed for uninterruptible power supply (UPS) applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Design and Analysis of an Energy Storage Flywheel
    PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF AN ENERGY STORAGE FLYWHEEL ___________________________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia ___________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Arunvel Kailasan May 2013 APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering ___________________________________ Arunvel Kailasan This dissertation has been read and approved by the Examining Committee: __________________________________ Timothy Dimond, Advisor __________________________________ Houston Wood, Chairman __________________________________ George Gillies __________________________________ Andres Clarens __________________________________ Wei Jiang Accepted for the School of Engineering and Applied Science: _________________________________ James H. Aylor, Dean May 2013 Abstract Energy storage is becoming increasingly important with the rising need to accommodate a greater population. Flywheel energy storage systems store kinetic energy by constantly spinning a compact rotor in a low-friction environment. When short-term back-up power is required as a result of utility power loss or fluctuations, the rotor's inertia allows it to continue spinning and the resulting kinetic energy is converted to electricity. Unlike the fossil-fuel power plants and batteries, the Flywheel based energy storage systems does not emit any harmful byproducts during their operation and have gained a lot of interest recently. A typical flywheel system is comprised of an energy storage rotor, a motor-generator system, bearings, power electronics, controls and housing. Conventional flywheel designs have a large diameter energy storage rotor attached to a smaller diameter section which is used as a motor/generator.
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGN of a WATER TOWER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Graduate School University of Missouri
    DESIGN OF A WATER TOWER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate School University of Missouri - Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by SAGAR KISHOR GIRI Dr. Noah Manring, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2013 The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined he thesis entitled DESIGN OF A WATER TOWER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM presented by SAGAR KISHOR GIRI a candidate for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE and hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. Noah Manring Dr. Roger Fales Dr. Robert O`Connell ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my appreciation to my thesis advisor, Dr. Noah Manring, for his constant guidance, advice and motivation to overcome any and all obstacles faced while conducting this research and support throughout my degree program without which I could not have completed my master’s degree. Furthermore, I extend my appreciation to Dr. Roger Fales and Dr. Robert O`Connell for serving on my thesis committee. I also would like to express my gratitude to all the students, professors and staff of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department for all the support and helping me to complete my master’s degree successfully and creating an exceptional environment in which to work and study. Finally, last, but of course not the least, I would like to thank my parents, my sister and my friends for their continuous support and encouragement to complete my program, research and thesis. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ ii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Energy Storage
    sustainability Review A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Energy Storage Ioan Sarbu * ID and Calin Sebarchievici Department of Building Services Engineering, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Piata Victoriei, No. 2A, 300006 Timisoara, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-256-403-991; Fax: +40-256-403-987 Received: 7 December 2017; Accepted: 10 January 2018; Published: 14 January 2018 Abstract: Thermal energy storage (TES) is a technology that stocks thermal energy by heating or cooling a storage medium so that the stored energy can be used at a later time for heating and cooling applications and power generation. TES systems are used particularly in buildings and in industrial processes. This paper is focused on TES technologies that provide a way of valorizing solar heat and reducing the energy demand of buildings. The principles of several energy storage methods and calculation of storage capacities are described. Sensible heat storage technologies, including water tank, underground, and packed-bed storage methods, are briefly reviewed. Additionally, latent-heat storage systems associated with phase-change materials for use in solar heating/cooling of buildings, solar water heating, heat-pump systems, and concentrating solar power plants as well as thermo-chemical storage are discussed. Finally, cool thermal energy storage is also briefly reviewed and outstanding information on the performance and costs of TES systems are included. Keywords: storage system; phase-change materials; chemical storage; cold storage; performance 1. Introduction Recent projections predict that the primary energy consumption will rise by 48% in 2040 [1]. On the other hand, the depletion of fossil resources in addition to their negative impact on the environment has accelerated the shift toward sustainable energy sources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Numerical and Graphical Review of Energy Storage Technologies', Energies, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer A Numerical and Graphical Review of Energy Storage Technologies Citation for published version: Sabihuddin, S, Kiprakis, A & Mueller, M 2015, 'A Numerical and Graphical Review of Energy Storage Technologies', Energies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 172-216. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010172 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3390/en8010172 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Energies General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 Energies 2015, 8, 172-216; doi:10.3390/en8010172 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Review A Numerical and Graphical Review of Energy Storage Technologies Siraj Sabihuddin *, Aristides E. Kiprakis and Markus Mueller Institute for Energy Systems (IES), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Faraday Building, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.E.K.); [email protected] (M.M.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-0-131-650-6487; Fax: +44-0-131-650-6554.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 MW 130 Kwh Flywheel Energy Storage System
    2 MW 130 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Matthew Caprio, John Herbst,1 and Robert Thelen The University of Texas at Austin Abstract The Center for Electromechanics has developed and is currently testing a 2 MW, 130 kWh (480 MJ) flywheel energy storage system (FESS) designed as a load leveling energy management device. The flywheel energy storage system consists of the energy storage flywheel, a high speed induction motor/generator, and a bi- directional power converter. The FESS is a key element of the Advanced Locomotive Propulsion System (ALPS), an advanced high speed passenger locomotive power supply being developed for use on existing (non- electrified) track to provide speed and acceleration performance comparable to modern electric trains currently in service on electrified routes. This paper describes the electrical and physical characteristics of the FESS, the application requirements that shaped the design of the FESS, and the internal details of the major components: the flywheel, motor / generator, and power converter. Safety of the flywheel is addressed in terms of the designed probability against a ring burst and the ability of the internal containment structure to controllably manage an unlikely burst event. Finally, the current status of the flywheel component development, testing, and planned future demonstrations are described. ALPS Flywheel System Overview The ALPS flywheel energy storage system (FESS) serves as an electrical load leveling device for a hybrid electric locomotive propulsion system. The FESS reduces load fluctuations of the prime generator by providing supplemental power to the dc bus during periods of peak acceleration, and recharging during periods of deceleration or excess generation capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage Analysis
    Energy Storage Analysis Chad Hunter, Evan Reznicek, Michael Penev, Josh Eichman, Sam Baldwin National Renewable Energy Laboratory Thursday, May 21, 2020 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2020 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Project ID SA173 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information. Overview: Hydrogen grid energy storage analysis Timeline Barriers (4.5) Start: October 2019 A. Future Market Behavior End: June 2020 • Assessing competitiveness of hydrogen for grid storage C. Inconsistent Data, Assumptions & Guidelines 50% complete • Consistent modeling methodology using established DOE cost/price and performance targets D. Insufficient Suite of Models and Tools • Develop hydrogen grid storage techno-economic tool Budget Partners Total Project Funding: $155k Project Management EERE Strategic Priorities and Impacts Analysis (SPIA) • FY20: $155k Collaborators and Peer Reviewers (alphabetical) Total DOE funds received to Ballard, Bioenergy Technology Office, Fossil Energy, NREL (Paul Denholm, Wesley Cole), Office of date: $50k Electricity, Solar Energy Technology Office, Water Power Technology Office NREL | 2 Relevance (1/3): HFTO Systems Analysis Framework Hydrogen Grid Energy Storage Analysis • H2@Scale • DOE Fuel Cell • SPIA/HFTO hydrogen Technologies Office Integrates System Analysis Framework: energy storage • DOE Strategic • ANL bulk hydrogen Priorities and • Leverages and expands existing storage analysis Impacts Analysis systems analysis models • PNNL hydrogen
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Mobile Flywheel Energy Storage Systems State-Of-The-Art
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 05, 2021 Overview of Mobile Flywheel Energy Storage Systems State-Of-The-Art Dagnæs-Hansen, Nikolaj A.; Santos, Ilmar Published in: Proceedings of 13th SIRM: The 13th International Conference on Dynamics of Rotating Machinery Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Dagnæs-Hansen, N. A., & Santos, I. (2019). Overview of Mobile Flywheel Energy Storage Systems State-Of- The-Art. In Proceedings of 13th SIRM: The 13th International Conference on Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (pp. 282-294). Technical University of Denmark. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. SIRM 2019 – 13th International Conference on Dynamics of Rotating Machines, Copenhagen, Denmark, 13th – 15th February 2019 Overview of Mobile Flywheel Energy Storage Systems State-Of-The-Art Nikolaj A. Dagnaes-Hansen 1, Ilmar F.
    [Show full text]