Low-Carbon Heating and Cooling: Overcoming One of World's Most Important Net Zero Challenges
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thermal Storage Impact on CHP Cogeneration Performance with Southwoods Case Study Edmonton, Alberta Michael Roppelt C.E.T
Thermal Storage Impact on CHP Cogeneration Performance with Southwoods Case Study Edmonton, Alberta Michael Roppelt C.E.T. CHP Cogeneration Solar PV Solar Thermal Grid Supply Thermal Storage GeoExchange RenewableAlternative & LowEnergy Carbon Microgrid Hybrid ConventionalSystemSystem System Optional Solar Thermal Option al Solar PV CNG & BUILDING OR Refueling COMMUNITY Station CHP Cogeneration SCALE 8 DEVELOPMENT Hot Water Hot Water DHW Space Heating $ SAVINGS GHG OPERATING Thermal Energy Cool Water Exchange & Storage ElectricalMicro Micro-Grid-Grid Thermal Microgrid Moving Energy not Wasting Energy Natural Gas Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Cogeneration $350,000 2,500,000 kWh RETAILINPUT OUTPUT VALUE NATURAL GAS $400,000. $100,000.30,000 Gj (85% Efficiency) CHP $50,000 Cogeneration15,000 Energy Gj Technologies CHP Unit Sizing Poorly sized units will not perform optimally which will cancel out the benefits. • For optimal efficiency, CHP units should be designed to provide baseline electrical or thermal output. • A plant needs to operate as many hours as possible, since idle plants produce no benefits. • CHP units have the ability to modulate, or change their output in order to meet fluctuating demand. Meeting Electric Power Demand Energy Production Profile 700 Hourly Average 600 353 January 342 February 500 333 March 324 April 400 345 May 300 369 June 400 July 200 402 August 348 September 100 358 October 0 362 November 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Meeting Heat Demand with CHP Cogeneration Energy Production Profile Heat Demand (kWh) Electric Demand (kWh) Cogen Heat (kWh) Waste Heat Heat Shortfall Useable Heat CHP Performance INEFFICIENCY 15% SPACE HEATING DAILY AND HEAT 35% SEASONAL ELECTRICAL 50% IMBALANCE 35% 50% DHW 15% Industry Studies The IEA works to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 30 member countries and beyond. -
Assessing the Potential Benefits and Limits of Electric Storage
sustainability Article Assessing the Potential Benefits and Limits of Electric Storage Heaters for Wind Curtailment Mitigation: A Finnish Case Study Mubbashir Ali *, Jussi Ekström and Matti Lehtonen Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland; jussi.ekstrom@aalto.fi (J.E.); matti.lehtonen@aalto.fi (M.L.) * Correspondence: mubbashir.ali@aalto.fi; Tel.: +358-50-436-7307 Academic Editor: João P. S. Catalão Received: 11 April 2017; Accepted: 12 May 2017; Published: 16 May 2017 Abstract: Driven by policy changes and technological advancement, wind power installations are booming as compared to any other types of power generation. However, the increased penetration of renewable generation in the power systems has resulted in high level of curtailment. Advanced energy storage technologies have been increasingly scrutinized as a feasible mitigation option in smart grids. This paper investigates the potential of mitigating wind generation curtailment via aggregating the domestic electric storage heaters. The key findings show that aggregating domestic thermal storages is a viable option for curtailment mitigation, but with the indispensable caution that mitigation potential significantly saturates as the share of wind generation escalates beyond a certain limit. Keywords: curtailment mitigation; electric storage heaters; wind generation 1. Introduction In the EU, the integration of wind energy in power systems is expanding because of policy-driven targets with a total installed wind power capacity about 150 GW [1]. In 2016 alone, around 13 GW has been added to the system, accounting for about 50% of the new capacity installation [1]. Though this is a practical step towards a carbon-neutral power system, this must be treated carefully as the systems have already been experiencing elevated levels of curtailment [2]. -
A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Energy Storage
sustainability Review A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Energy Storage Ioan Sarbu * ID and Calin Sebarchievici Department of Building Services Engineering, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Piata Victoriei, No. 2A, 300006 Timisoara, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-256-403-991; Fax: +40-256-403-987 Received: 7 December 2017; Accepted: 10 January 2018; Published: 14 January 2018 Abstract: Thermal energy storage (TES) is a technology that stocks thermal energy by heating or cooling a storage medium so that the stored energy can be used at a later time for heating and cooling applications and power generation. TES systems are used particularly in buildings and in industrial processes. This paper is focused on TES technologies that provide a way of valorizing solar heat and reducing the energy demand of buildings. The principles of several energy storage methods and calculation of storage capacities are described. Sensible heat storage technologies, including water tank, underground, and packed-bed storage methods, are briefly reviewed. Additionally, latent-heat storage systems associated with phase-change materials for use in solar heating/cooling of buildings, solar water heating, heat-pump systems, and concentrating solar power plants as well as thermo-chemical storage are discussed. Finally, cool thermal energy storage is also briefly reviewed and outstanding information on the performance and costs of TES systems are included. Keywords: storage system; phase-change materials; chemical storage; cold storage; performance 1. Introduction Recent projections predict that the primary energy consumption will rise by 48% in 2040 [1]. On the other hand, the depletion of fossil resources in addition to their negative impact on the environment has accelerated the shift toward sustainable energy sources. -
Energy Storage Analysis
Energy Storage Analysis Chad Hunter, Evan Reznicek, Michael Penev, Josh Eichman, Sam Baldwin National Renewable Energy Laboratory Thursday, May 21, 2020 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2020 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Project ID SA173 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information. Overview: Hydrogen grid energy storage analysis Timeline Barriers (4.5) Start: October 2019 A. Future Market Behavior End: June 2020 • Assessing competitiveness of hydrogen for grid storage C. Inconsistent Data, Assumptions & Guidelines 50% complete • Consistent modeling methodology using established DOE cost/price and performance targets D. Insufficient Suite of Models and Tools • Develop hydrogen grid storage techno-economic tool Budget Partners Total Project Funding: $155k Project Management EERE Strategic Priorities and Impacts Analysis (SPIA) • FY20: $155k Collaborators and Peer Reviewers (alphabetical) Total DOE funds received to Ballard, Bioenergy Technology Office, Fossil Energy, NREL (Paul Denholm, Wesley Cole), Office of date: $50k Electricity, Solar Energy Technology Office, Water Power Technology Office NREL | 2 Relevance (1/3): HFTO Systems Analysis Framework Hydrogen Grid Energy Storage Analysis • H2@Scale • DOE Fuel Cell • SPIA/HFTO hydrogen Technologies Office Integrates System Analysis Framework: energy storage • DOE Strategic • ANL bulk hydrogen Priorities and • Leverages and expands existing storage analysis Impacts Analysis systems analysis models • PNNL hydrogen -
Grid Energy Storage
Grid Energy Storage U.S. Department of Energy December 2013 Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the members of the core team dedicated to developing this report on grid energy storage: Imre Gyuk (OE), Mark Johnson (ARPA-E), John Vetrano (Office of Science), Kevin Lynn (EERE), William Parks (OE), Rachna Handa (OE), Landis Kannberg (PNNL), Sean Hearne & Karen Waldrip (SNL), Ralph Braccio (Booz Allen Hamilton). Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 State of Energy Storage in US and Abroad .......................................................................................... 11 3.0 Grid Scale Energy Storage Applications .............................................................................................. 20 4.0 Summary of Key Barriers ..................................................................................................................... 30 5.0Energy Storage Strategic Goals .......................................................................................................... 32 6.0 Implementation of its Goals ............................................................................................................... -
Consultation Response
Consultation Response HHIC response to ‘A future framework for heat in buildings: call for evidence’ About HHIC The Heating and Hotwater Industry Council (HHIC) are the leading representative body for the UK domestic heating and hot water industry, worth £3-4 billion per year. HHIC’s membership base covers approximately 94 per cent of heating and hot water solutions available in the UK. HHIC are a division of the Energy and Utilities Alliance (EUA). Full Response 1. Do you agree that the policy framework should focus initially on enabling the market to drive the transition away from high carbon fossil fuels, and in the longer term on helping consumers and industry to comply with regulations? HHIC believe that BEIS should work with industry to transition from existing fuels to sustainable bio fuels. We do not believe BEIS need to transition homes away from their existing appliance type. This would be disproportionately expensive. We agree that homes should no longer be heated by coal. The evidence and costs mean that this is disproportionately negative today and not sustainable in the future. However the other high carbon fossil fuel that BEIS are looking into is oil for heating. Whilst this is a fuel with higher carbon emissions than natural gas and electricity its overall Camden House, Warwick Road, Kenilworth, Warwickshire, CV8 1TH T: +44 (0)1926 513777 F: +44 (0)1926 511923 E: [email protected] W: www.centralheating.co.uk contribution towards the UK’s total CO2’s emissions is approximately 0.5%. HHIC has estimated that is would cost upwards of £10,000m1 in order to move these systems to an electric one. -
Water Heaters and Storage Tanks
Water Heaters and Storage Tanks Ecodesign and Energy Label Review Study Task 4 Technical analysis FINAL REPORT Review study of Commission Regulation (EU) No. 813/2013 [Ecodesign] and Commission Delegated Regulation No. (EU) No. 811/2013 (Energy Label) Prepared by VHK, for the European Commission July 2019 The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Prepared by Study team: Van Holsteijn en Kemna B.V. (VHK), The Netherlands Authors: René Kemna, Martijn van Elburg (both VHK) Study team contact: René Kemna ([email protected]) Contract manager: Jan Viegand, Viegand Maagøe Project website: www.ecohotwater-review.eu Specific contract: no. ENER/C3/SER/FV 2016-537/08/FWC 2015-619 LOT2/03/SI2.753935 Title: Review Study existing ecodesign & energy labelling Water Heaters & Tanks Contract date: 9.6.2017 Consortium: Viegand Maagøe, VHK, Wuppertal Institute, Armines, Oakdene Hollins Cover: DHW storage tank with coil [picture VHK 2016-2017] _______________________ This study was ordered and paid for by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy. The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. This report has been prepared by the authors to the best of their ability and knowledge. -
Thermal Energy Storage for Grid Applications: Current Status and Emerging Trends
energies Review Thermal Energy Storage for Grid Applications: Current Status and Emerging Trends Diana Enescu 1,2,* , Gianfranco Chicco 3 , Radu Porumb 2,4 and George Seritan 2,5 1 Electronics Telecommunications and Energy Department, University Valahia of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania 2 Wing Computer Group srl, 077042 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (G.S.) 3 Dipartimento Energia “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy; [email protected] 4 Power Engineering Systems Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania 5 Department of Measurements, Electrical Devices and Static Converters, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 December 2019; Accepted: 8 January 2020; Published: 10 January 2020 Abstract: Thermal energy systems (TES) contribute to the on-going process that leads to higher integration among different energy systems, with the aim of reaching a cleaner, more flexible and sustainable use of the energy resources. This paper reviews the current literature that refers to the development and exploitation of TES-based solutions in systems connected to the electrical grid. These solutions facilitate the energy system integration to get additional flexibility for energy management, enable better use of variable renewable energy sources (RES), and contribute to the modernisation of the energy system infrastructures, the enhancement of the grid operation practices that include energy shifting, and the provision of cost-effective grid services. This paper offers a complementary view with respect to other reviews that deal with energy storage technologies, materials for TES applications, TES for buildings, and contributions of electrical energy storage for grid applications. -
Evidence Gathering for Electric Heating Options in Off Gas Grid Homes: Final Report
Evidence gathering for electric options in OGG households Element Energy Evidence gathering for electric heating options in off gas grid homes: Final Report BEIS Research Paper no: 2019/021 April 2019 Element Energy Limited Suite 1 Bishop Bateman Court Thompson’s Lane Cambridge CB5 8AQ Tel: 01223 852499 Fax: 01223 353475 1 Evidence gathering for electric options in OGG households BEIS Project team Sam Foster [email protected] Fiona Hughes [email protected] Ian Walker [email protected] 2 Evidence gathering for electric options in OGG households BEIS Table of Contents Project team ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 10 Glossary ......................................................................................................................................... 11 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Context and objectives .......................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... -
Electrification, Heat Pumps and Thermal Energy Storage by MARK M
TECHNICAL FEATURE ©ASHRAE www.ashrae.org. Used with permission from ASHRAE Journal at www.trane.com and www.calmac.com. This article may not be copied nor distributed in either paper or digital form without ASHRAE’s permission. For more information about ASHRAE, visit www.ashrae.org. Using Yesterday’s Waste Energy for Tomorrow’s Heating Electrification, Heat Pumps and Thermal Energy Storage BY MARK M. MACCRACKEN, P.E., LIFE MEMBER ASHRAE “Electrification” has recently become a widely accepted road map toward the goal of a low-carbon future. The concept is easily understood in the transportation sector: cars using fossil fuels as their onboard energy source can never be carbon free. However, an electric car charged by a carbon-free source can be carbon free. When applied to buildings, one method is to envision stopping the flow of fossil fuels to them and having all energy come from the carbon-free grid of the future. Some skeptics believe it is a pipe dream to have a carbon-free electric grid, but certainly you can’t have a carbon-free building if you are burning fossil fuels in them. Electrification will likely play a part in our low-carbon future, so understanding heat pumps, and thermal energy storage’s relationship to them, will be critical. After the architects have done their best to lower the Energy in Everything energy loads in buildings, many HVAC engineers, given Most engineers understand that the term “heat pump” the challenge to heat a building without fossil fuels, will is a misnomer, mainly because “heat” is a relative term. -
Technical Guideline Development for High Performance Coastal First Nations Housing
Technical Guideline Development for High Performance Coastal First Nations Housing UBC Sustainability Scholars / CEEN 596 Final Report April 22, 2016 Dylan Heerema Executive Summary This CEEN596 and UBC Sustainability Scholars project has evaluated a number of standards, technologies and methods for new home construction in the remote communities of the Great Bear Initiative Coastal First Nations in British Columbia. Current home construction in these communities does not address a number of technical, social, economic and cultural needs. The key issues to be addressed in new home construction, and the recommended solutions proposed in this study are summarized below: Existing Housing Issue Solutions for New Housing Issue #1: Water Leakage • Rainscreening and Pooling • Covered entryways and steel doors • Effective gutters and eavestroughs • Weatherproof building envelope • Sealed ducts and other openings • Graded site and well-drained foundation • Sufficient ventilation Issue #2: Mould • Elimination of basement or crawlspace • Airtight building envelope • Mechanical ventilation • Heat pump or forced air heating • Mould-resistant drywall, insulation and paint Issue #3: Cold and Drafty • Airtight building envelope Spaces • Slab on grade foundation • Heat recovery ventilation • Heat pump or forced air heating Issue #4: Inadequate • Passive solar design Gathering Space • Open floor plans • Flexible common areas Issue #5: Food • Larger kitchens and pantries Preparation and Storage • Outdoor preparation facilities for fish and game • Adequate -
Keep It Cool with Thermal Energy Storage Tomorrow's Energy Here Comes Summer
U.S. Department of Energy Keep It Cool with Thermal Energy Storage Tomorrow's Energy Here comes summer. Temperatures are rising, but energy costs aren’t, Today thanks to an innovative way of storing nighttime off-peak energy for daytime peak use—cool thermal energy storage. for Cities and Counties In most states, demand for electrical imbalance between daytime need and power peaks during summer. Air- nighttime abundance. Although “cool conditioning is the main reason, in thermal energy” sounds like a contra- some areas accounting for as much as diction, the phrase “thermal energy 50% of power drawn during the hot storage” is widely used to describe midday hours when electricity is storage of both heating and cooling most expensive. But during the night, energy. Heating TES usually involves utilities have electricity to spare, and using inexpensive, off-peak power to this “off-peak” electricity is much add heat to a storage medium for cheaper. Now there’s a way to air- later use. condition during the day using elec- Patrons at the Pasadena Central tricity produced at night. In contrast, cool TES uses off-peak Library can enjoy a good book and power to provide cooling capacity cool air despite stifling summer Cool thermal energy storage (TES) by extracting heat from a storage temperatures. The library uses a cool has become one of the primary medium, such as ice, chilled water, or storage system to keep energy costs solutions to the electrical power “phase-change materials.” Typically, down during daytime peak use. a cool storage system uses refrigera- tion equipment at night to create a reservoir of cold material.